Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:40:27 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Rob <robaree@gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is OpenNTPD better than the included NTPD? Message-ID: <20061011194027.GA22001@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <6bcc7a470610111231g67186cc0n687a96bd4d808bb5@mail.gmail.com> References: <6bcc7a470610111231g67186cc0n687a96bd4d808bb5@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 03:31:47PM -0400, Rob wrote: > I don't plan on allowing anyone to connect to my machine or use it as > a NTPD server. I see that OpenNTPD (OpenBSD's version) by default > doesn't listen on any IP/port and seems a little more secure. Is this > a good one to use over the included one in FreeBSD, or is there > something better? How are you going to run an NTP server that doesn't listen on any IP/port? Kris --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFLUiqWry0BWjoQKURAhv4AJ4+jvvmU0P71XAVk990J+ZNqyOwtQCfXpPX Mlo0HPOVPaSc6fOVkRQBbEY= =DhyZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061011194027.GA22001>