From owner-cvs-all Tue Sep 21 18:31: 5 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id DE4FE1574C; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 18:31:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EDAF1CD734; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 18:31:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@hub.freebsd.org) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 18:31:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Dmitrij Tejblum Cc: Mark Murray , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/secure/lib/libcrypt Makefile src/lib/libcrypt Makefile In-Reply-To: <199909212219.CAA03066@tejblum.pp.ru> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Dmitrij Tejblum wrote: > You know, you could DTRT from the beginning. You could do not do the > major version bump secretly. You could do not blame other people when > you do a mistake. I haven't had the chance to check out what's actually changed here, but it sounds like mark recommitted part (or all) of Brandon's previous attempt to extend libcrypt back in jan 1999 - he bumped the version number there briefly as well, ISTR. That code was kinda messy, so if mark cleaned it up somewhat (and solved the bootstrap issues) its a good thing. The reason Brandon bumped the version number is (probably) because he added a couple of new functions to libcrypt - I don't know if these are present currently (I didn't see their utility so removed them in my replacement code). It's all backwards-compatible though so you're right that it shouldn't have been bumped. This is current, though, and people can deal with removing the .so.3 if we take it back to .so.2. Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message