From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Feb 11 01:38:06 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FBA916A420
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 01:38:06 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr)
Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3117F43D72
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 01:37:58 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr)
Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])
	(authenticated bits=128)
	by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1B1bkUk022268
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
	Sat, 11 Feb 2006 03:37:48 +0200
Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1])
	by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1B1bfUg006808;
	Sat, 11 Feb 2006 03:37:41 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr)
Received: (from keramida@localhost)
	by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1B1bfAo006807;
	Sat, 11 Feb 2006 03:37:41 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr)
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 03:37:40 +0200
From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>
To: Jonathan Noack <noackjr@alumni.rice.edu>
Message-ID: <20060211013739.GA6802@flame.pc>
References: <43ED294A.2050505@savvis.net>
	<200602110128.50618.max@love2party.net>
	<20060211003846.GA153@uci.agh.edu.pl>
	<43ED3423.5060500@alumni.rice.edu>
	<20060211010216.GA6287@uci.agh.edu.pl>
	<20060211010509.GA1947@flame.pc> <43ED3F27.1080808@alumni.rice.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <43ED3F27.1080808@alumni.rice.edu>
X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.352,
	required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.85,
	BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20)
X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: -current is sluggish
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 01:38:06 -0000

On 2006-02-10 20:34, Jonathan Noack <noackjr@alumni.rice.edu> wrote:
>Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>>On 2006-02-11 02:02, Krzysztof Kowalik <kkowalik@uci.agh.edu.pl> wrote:
>>>Jonathan Noack <noackjr@alumni.rice.edu> wrote:
>>>> I think debug.cpufreq.lowest is what you want.  It is documented in
>>>> cpufreq(4):
>>>
>>> Oh, indeed. And to think that I actually did read this manual page.
>>> Thank you. :-)
>>
>> Isn't the minimum level limited by dev.cpu.0.freq_levels though?
>
> My recollection is that setting debug.cpufreq.lowest would result in low
> values being removed from dev.cpu.0.freq_levels.  So if
> dev.cpu.0.freq_levels started at "800/-1 400/-1 200/-1 100/-1" and you
> set debug.cpufreq.lowest to "300", dev.cpu.0.freq_levels would then
> become "800/-1 400/-1".

Ah!  I see... Thanks for the explanation :)