From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 10 17:14:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880E437B401 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:14:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from perrin.int.nxad.com (internal.ext.nxad.com [69.1.70.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02EEF43F85 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:14:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sean@perrin.int.nxad.com) Received: by perrin.int.nxad.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C452C21065; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:13:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:13:47 -0700 From: Sean Chittenden To: RDB Message-ID: <20030411001347.GI79923@perrin.int.nxad.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-PGP-Key: finger seanc@FreeBSD.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3849 3760 1AFE 7B17 11A0 83A6 DD99 E31F BC84 B341 X-Web-Homepage: http://sean.chittenden.org/ cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Semi-polling mode and net.inet.tcp.inflight_enable X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 00:14:08 -0000 > I'm curious whether anyone on this list has found real-world > circumstances in which either semi-polling mode or the > net.inet.tcp.inflight_enable setting improved performance, and if so > what the circumstances were. Performance in terms of what? -sc -- Sean Chittenden