From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Mar 31 5:17:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mailgw5.prontomail.com (mailgw5.prontomail.com [209.185.149.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A4537B765 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 05:17:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tkato@prontomail.ne.jp) Received: from mail46.prontomail.com (209.185.149.146) by mailgw5.prontomail.com (NPlex 2.0.123) for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 05:08:46 -0800 Received: from web24 (209.185.149.224) by mail46.prontomail.com (NPlex 2.0.123); Fri, 31 Mar 2000 05:17:05 -0800 From: "KATO Tsuguru" Message-Id: <78318855EC604D1178A200807CFB3248@tkato.prontomail.ne.jp> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 22:17:28 +0900 X-Priority: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/17665: Update port: games/xhexagons to 5.5.2 Cc: knu@idaemons.org X-Mailer: Web Based Pronto Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Hey, don't you guys think he should become a committer to commit the > patches himself? Seems to me our GNATS database is _continually_ > flooded by his numerous PR's! ;) The PR's I send are always very simple, mostly for applying to poring guidelines. If everyone to become a bit more careful about guidelines when committing the port, I won't have to send such a "trivial" PR's. > Kato-san, could you afford to be a committer? Since I have no port to maintain, it should be impossible. :-( Even if not, there supposed to be sufficient number of commiters to cope with PR's appearing now.... -- KATO Tsuguru / tkato@prontomail.ne.jp Sent by Japanese ProntoMail To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message