Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 22:50:27 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, Boris Popov <bp@butya.kz>, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [CFR] /sys/miscfs/* -> /sys/fs/ Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105232242330.68283-100000@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <37017.990609604@axl.fw.uunet.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > On Tue, 22 May 2001 20:04:48 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > >ext2fs would go in fs/gnu/ext2fs (or is it gnu/fs/ext2fs?). Ugh. > > > > it would be src/sys/gnu/fs/ext2fs or src/sys/contrib/fs/ext2fs s/Ugh/Bletch/g > Is it feasible to keep this consistent with userland by putting the > source in src/sys/contrib and the build infrastructure in src/sys/gnu? No. ext2fs is not contrib'ed. (It's only 30% GPL'ed too, except the GPL makes in all GPL'ed.) Userland at least installs things in reasonable places, so that there is no /usr/include/contrib (or is it /usr/contrib/include?). Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0105232242330.68283-100000>