Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:42:04 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> To: marino@freebsd.org Cc: "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, "ports-committers@freebsd.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r337624 - head/games/daimonin-music Message-ID: <CAF6rxgmTxo-Z%2Bzsn1MX2ujinsRkNF1VBTbgk6x2EZEeDP-Qkgg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <52E19485.2090206@marino.st> References: <201312262215.rBQMF1ZF002032@svn.freebsd.org> <20131226223743.GV40122@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <52BCB084.3040504@marino.st> <20131226224813.GW40122@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <CAF6rxg=msRc5qkn0h-0fZdVyCjiFXNGV2eCwHZK-KGaCWf0qAw@mail.gmail.com> <52E19485.2090206@marino.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:15 PM, John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> wrote: > If I remember correctly, the entire concept was flawed. The original > maintainer recognized that the distfile could get rerolled. He was > setting up a method where the port would not break if/when it was rerolled. Agreed. > Obviously that's absurd and opens the door wide open for attack. The > solution was to generate distinfo and just let a reroll temporarily > break the port. Generally, agreed. > Incidentally, it was not rerolled in the last couple of > years. My understanding is that the maintainer claimed a re-roll fairly often, even daily at times. Its been a while since I looked into this port and am happy for you to handle it. :) -- Eitan Adler Source, Ports, Doc committer Bugmeister, Ports Security teams
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgmTxo-Z%2Bzsn1MX2ujinsRkNF1VBTbgk6x2EZEeDP-Qkgg>