From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 2 22:07:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4D116A494; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 22:07:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01DDD43D46; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 22:07:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from zion.baldwin.cx (zion.baldwin.cx [192.168.0.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kA2M7FR1015381; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:07:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:06:46 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <454936CA.6060308@FreeBSD.org> <454A60E9.7020303@FreeBSD.org> <20061102214157.GC2028@rambler-co.ru> In-Reply-To: <20061102214157.GC2028@rambler-co.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611021706.47325.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [192.168.0.1]); Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:07:30 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.3/2151/Thu Nov 2 13:35:18 2006 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: Daniel Eischen , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libpthread shared library version number X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 22:07:35 -0000 On Thursday 02 November 2006 16:41, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 01:19:37PM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > >On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 08:09:48AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote: > > >Hmm, bumping not versioned libraries *now* and not bumping them > > >again at pre-release would work, but doing it without also bumping > > >"to be versioned" libraries is IMO pointless. And if we bump all > > >of them now, we'll have to bump some of them again when versioning > > >is turned on by default. > > > > No, we will not have to do it. Why would we? It's -CURRENT, so that > > nobody really cares about backward/forward compatibility within that branch. > > > I'd very much like NOT to have to recompile all of my installed > ports on my -CURRENT boxes the day we turn on symbol versioning, > and that will require the shlib major bump of those libs that > will provide symbol versioning. If we do the bump now, we'll > have to do it again later, and that's slightly against the rule > that we only bump them once inside a branch. Hmm, that's honestly what I planned to do. :) There will only be 1 bump in HEAD though regardless of how many ABI changes we have in HEAD, as we don't really support ABI compat on HEAD. -- John Baldwin