From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 6 12:21:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2126F16A41C; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 12:21:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from postfix4-2.free.fr (postfix4-2.free.fr [213.228.0.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F3143D45; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 12:21:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (vol75-8-82-233-239-98.fbx.proxad.net [82.233.239.98]) by postfix4-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2FD1706C9; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 14:21:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: by tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 61049405B; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 14:21:10 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 14:21:10 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen To: Robert Backhaus Message-ID: <20050706122110.GC39292@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <20041102222000.GA65845@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050706073205.GA942@galgenberg.net> <20050706085737.GT73907@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <200507061116.17267.thierry@herbelot.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Jeremie Le Hen , current@freebsd.org, thierry@herbelot.com Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Ports are not ready for CFLAGS=-O2 in 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 12:21:08 -0000 Hi Robert, > Of course, the _correct_ way to fix this is for the ports that are now > broken by -O2 to be fixed by forcing -O in their makefiles, which > really should have been done from the beginning. I agree that the correct way to fix ports broken with -O2 is to force -O in their makefiles, but this does not say that having something like PORTS_CFLAGS would be a bad idea, does it ? Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >