Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 25 Jan 2014 12:55:45 -0800
From:      Waitman Gobble <gobble.wa@gmail.com>
To:        "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Why was nslookup removed from FreeBSD 10?
Message-ID:  <CAFuo_fxNegB8uO7JMiNyOE4pmz04_u9JCsGXtkqQ0fbiVJZAgg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <52E41619.1000505@fjl.co.uk>
References:  <52E40CC4.6090401@fjl.co.uk> <201401252137.50132.mark.tinka@seacom.mu> <52E41619.1000505@fjl.co.uk>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Frank Leonhardt <frank2@fjl.co.uk> wrote:

> On 25/01/2014 19:37, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, January 25, 2014 09:13:08 PM Frank Leonhardt
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Unbelievable, but true - someone somewhere thought that
>>> removing nslookup from the base system was the way to
>>> go.
>>>
>>> Why? Can anyone shed any light on how this decision was
>>> made?
>>>
>> If you read:
>>
>>         http://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.0R/relnotes.html
>>
>> Under the "2.3. Userland Changes" section, you will notice:
>>
>>         "BIND has been removed from the base system.
>>          unbound(8), which is maintained by NLnet Labs, has
>>          been imported to support local DNS resolution
>>          functionality with DNSSEC. Note that it is not a
>>          replacement of BIND and the latest versions of BIND
>>          is still available in the Ports Collection. With
>>          this change, nslookup and dig are no longer a part
>>          of the base system. Users should instead use
>>          host(1) and drill(1) Alternatively, nslookup and
>>          dig can be obtained by installing dns/bind-tools
>>          port. [r255949]"
>>
>> So install /usr/ports/dns/bind-tools and you're a happy guy.
>>
>> As to the philosophy of it all, no point arguing. Fait
>> accompli.
>>
>> Mark.
>>
> As you and Waitman both pointed out, nslookup IS part of BIND, yet as I
> said in the diatribe following the question in my post, so is "host" and
> that's still there. Also Windoze has nslookup but doesn't include BIND. I
> agree there's no point arguing unless you know the rational behind what
> appears an arbitrary decision; hence my question. Was this simply an
> oversight or is there a thought-out reason for it that one can take issue
> with?
>
> IIRC, nslookup was present in 4.3BSD, and I'm pretty sure it existed
> before that. (That's BSD, not FreeBSD). Its relied on in scripts. The
> reason for dropping it from the base system must be pretty spectacular.
>
> FreeBSD 10.0 might be better known as FreeBSD Vista, at this rate.
>
>
> Regards, Frank.
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-
> unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>


You might try 'drill' in contrib/ldns

http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/release/10.0.0/contrib/ldns/drill/drill.c?view=log


-- 
Waitman Gobble
San Jose California USA
510-830-7975



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFuo_fxNegB8uO7JMiNyOE4pmz04_u9JCsGXtkqQ0fbiVJZAgg>