From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 23 01:11:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2235116A4CE for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 01:11:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-relay.tamu.edu (smtp-relay.tamu.edu [165.91.143.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D6C743D55 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 01:11:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tyler@tamu.edu) Received: from [192.168.1.161] (evilbit.resnet.tamu.edu [128.194.4.200]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-relay.tamu.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAN1BqcO091164 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 19:11:54 -0600 (CST) From: "R. Tyler Ballance" To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ddupGMgihND7nhL/fhzV" Message-Id: <1101172253.28304.44.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 19:10:53 -0600 Subject: pf on FreeBSD 4,5,6,etc ;) X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter (pf) List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 01:11:57 -0000 --=-ddupGMgihND7nhL/fhzV Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Howdy there,=20 I'm slightly curious about running packet filter on FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE.=20 Now, before I get flamed about just upgrading to 5.3-STABLE, let me just say that, that won't be happening until the uniprocessor performance improves (but that's another can 'o' beans) Anyways, I'm developing an application for my university (Texas A&M), and I can support packet filter on NetBSD-current, and OpenBSD 3.5,6, but I'm a bigger fan of FreeBSD, not to mention, the university runs it's main firewalls on Drawbridge (http://drawbridge.tamu.edu) on FreeBSD 4.xx-STABLE.=20 It'd be much easier to convince them to switch the internal bridges from slackware to FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE than FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE ;) Can it be done, or am I barking up the wrong tree? -R. Tyler Ballance --=-ddupGMgihND7nhL/fhzV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAQaKOHOgkwzi+drJUAQL7rg/9F0Dn/R+jhy8CYdFn1oSLftWMvov3XY1D z1iia3H7B75NCn8aMNPRHV/o6uT+OLrZlenzPsKMqJCMvmSynipicWOA2Clz+m8Q +Rjo90396e9YwAB5kj8tztoVRnxhHjuCoBiP0raus1Ffk0VMymnw8myIvH8mkmIq NFZl/zqa7n0rVjbhw95LqnybaD0s5rDr+KRBaKpnznnceltFk1agW1KtLa9mgey4 1z42dvF8/FG1E4wai8YEj/TgvtAGP6edjjA6GbAsWpdEgisaumJVP/RbBkGrjknm mwf442E1JE3y8twlVTFETGBXl7iZk3QvKO0jiKaMcg5LPcUUSYKowX7iEejV726E UyJBdZ63dffYD0R5+q5tcUZsU6+5yZYdWCptNav2shvUB17Gf0DMGC/FVhi1vOvu EoaE4aKaYTJECHtLcN0cpUG9uwntKbCR3M9DbRffNFX+SChjGQHjiWmpZLdrjGjy 0y9ef08LWKh0scDKs7xhNVE1IGKgSQvFSO/rrQHy3Myx3GHtf8qOnC224PJH66Yf Udtn/QpJID8t7cYeB3Dm4RCRgTk+zEdCkyG3m93U+2GONHb+dv+Tr0eKlKtDBRYM wFJjpwi+zrnRTLoHfEO7ObaCH4JGhVzdTU3YPY8k/Z6Tt+OvqkVf+AiCkLfVYFc3 vWUtftWTVlQ= =uyI/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ddupGMgihND7nhL/fhzV--