From owner-freebsd-current Wed Oct 14 22:20:30 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA04939 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 22:20:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zone.syracuse.net (zone.syracuse.net [205.232.47.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA04926 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 22:20:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from green@zone.syracuse.net) Received: from localhost (green@localhost) by zone.syracuse.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA23091; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 01:20:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 01:20:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Brian Feldman To: "Matthew N. Dodd" cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernel dependancies broken? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Okay, I won't yell you I can't reproduce this. But seriously, I wanted to see if that would work. It seems cam_xpt.c may be more important than other files to you, does it not? Why don't you look at Makefile, bsd.kern.mk, and friends and check out the dependencies, looking closely at cam_xpt.[co]? If changing _any_ random single source file (not header) causes a complete rebuild (try it!) then this is cause for a bit more concern. Brian Feldman On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Brian Feldman wrote: > > As a curiosity, what happens if you try 'make cam_xpt.o kernel'? > > It compiles cam_xpt.o before embarking on its systamatic recimpile of most > of the rest of the kernel. > > Don't tell me you can't reproduce this. > > > On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > > > > > > > > Anyone seen this? > > > > > > 1. edit src/sys/cam/cam_xpt.c > > > 2. add a quirk entry > > > 3. cd src/sys/compile/KERNEL/ > > > 4. 'make' > > > 5. wait while most of the kernel source is rebuilt. > > > > > > Note that I'm typing 'make' in a kernel compile directory that had just > > > finished building a kernel. No other files where changed. > > > > > > This is really annoying as it takes 30+ minutes for a 486 to chug through > > > a kernel compile that should only take about a minute for a simple 1 file > > > change. > > > > > > -- > > > | Matthew N. Dodd | 78 280Z | 75 164E | 84 245DL | FreeBSD/NetBSD/Sprite/VMS | > > > | winter@jurai.net | This Space For Rent | ix86,sparc,m68k,pmax,vax | > > > | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | Are you k-rad elite enough for my webpage? | > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > > > > > > > -- > | Matthew N. Dodd | 78 280Z | 75 164E | 84 245DL | FreeBSD/NetBSD/Sprite/VMS | > | winter@jurai.net | This Space For Rent | ix86,sparc,m68k,pmax,vax | > | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | Are you k-rad elite enough for my webpage? | > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message