From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 16 16:49:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653DD16A41F for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 16:49:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lehmann@ans-netz.de) Received: from avocado.salatschuessel.net (avocado.salatschuessel.net [83.136.81.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F77F43D46 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 16:49:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lehmann@ans-netz.de) Received: (qmail 41770 invoked by uid 89); 16 Sep 2005 16:47:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kartoffel.salatschuessel.net) (83.136.81.185) by avocado.salatschuessel.net with SMTP; 16 Sep 2005 16:47:50 -0000 Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 18:49:11 +0200 From: Oliver Lehmann To: joseph.koshy@gmail.com Message-Id: <20050916184911.38e2739a.lehmann@ans-netz.de> In-Reply-To: <84dead720509160921732e7f96@mail.gmail.com> References: <20050914194612.15692485.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <43286E37.40203@samsco.org> <20050914222013.178dc4dc.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <84dead72050914135239514c49@mail.gmail.com> <20050915000053.448f251b.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <84dead7205091500152a7c25d1@mail.gmail.com> <20050915172005.072f4bdf.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <20050915181238.54b16b4b.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <84dead720509160921732e7f96@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.1 (GTK+ 2.6.10; amd64-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: low(er) disk performance with sched_4bsd then with sched_ule X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 16:49:15 -0000 Joseph Koshy wrote: > I'm just not able to reproduce this kind of skewed > profile on -current on a uniprocessor amd64 and > on a P4 HT machine. I remember that when I tried w/o SMP it was much faster with 4bsd then it was with SMP (4BSd-UP was about the same as ULE with SMP). That was the point why I tried SMP with ULE - because I hoped to get the performance back I lost with switching from UP to SMP with 4BSD. > Just as an off-chance: how upto-date is your kernel? In > particular, do you have the following fix: > > "sys/vm/vm_pager.c:" > revision 1.105.2.1 I've 1.105 - I'll cvsup my 6_RELENG and report back if anything changed. -- Oliver Lehmann http://www.pofo.de/ http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/