Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 Feb 2002 22:25:24 +0100
From:      "Jan Stocker" <jstocker@tzi.de>
To:        <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>, <freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   RE: Updated ATAPI/CAM patches
Message-ID:  <000001c1c09e$6f4a7180$fe02010a@twoflower.liebende.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0202281136040.6492-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
I think Thomas is doing here a quite good job and it is also to him to
decide to include his sources and maybe maintain them. The ata sources have
changed a lot the last weeks, so until Thomas thinks his sources are under
heavy development too, both should do their jobs and we've some patches from
Thomas. If you include it now one depends of the other and you may get into
the problem of both altering the code from the other at the same time.
The (somewhat selfish) behavior to include it and give maintainership to
someone else leads to a originator stopping his work or the creation of 2
parallel solutions. Isn't it better the core team (or someone else thinking
(s)he's a better idea) supports Thomas and a stable and good solution is
integrated later (maybe with maintainership of Thomas)?

Jan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000001c1c09e$6f4a7180$fe02010a>