Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:45:26 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister <jerrymc@msu.edu> To: Evan Busch <antiequality@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A quality operating system Message-ID: <20110820144526.GA49027@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <CAC1X_0bP8SeyqMaR68AQPMzT%2Br-isv4h0bJPdtaF3377bQ%2BajQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAC1X_0bP8SeyqMaR68AQPMzT%2Br-isv4h0bJPdtaF3377bQ%2BajQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:47:04PM -0500, Evan Busch wrote: > Hi, > > I make decisions about hardware and software for those who work with me. > > Talking with my second in command this morning, we reached a quandary. > Ron is completely pro-Linux and pro-Windows, and against FreeBSD. > > What is odd about this is that he's the biggest UNIX fanatic I know, > not only all types of UNIX (dating back quite some time) but also all > Unix-like OSen. > > I told him I was considering FreeBSD because of greater stability and security. > > He asked me a question that stopped me dead: > > "What is a quality operating system?" > One that works reliably - like FreeBSD. I hope it is confy under that bridge. ////jerry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110820144526.GA49027>