From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 16 04:47:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F9A16A423 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 04:47:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pneumann@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F4E43D53 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 04:47:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pneumann@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so349708wri for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:47:41 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=Rrcj3gm6TlpC0jxrx45jqQz0q+9lOFRoLV5sm2Fz45S0LmMEWose7bkkdIBvwCHR73amaK2UVRj5bsV5jDhMU5rjl+R4vh+8SconPUUKI3+vz4fBFQ2UI6FjRbYum5qndzbTnYrDyNMgCxNtyg+xTNOdVXOSiXnYyNYoMPXR9jY= Received: by 10.54.151.7 with SMTP id y7mr1146151wrd; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:47:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.0.0.101? ( [200.74.11.167]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 34sm267146wra.2006.03.15.20.47.40; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:47:41 -0800 (PST) From: Phillip Neumann To: linimon@FreeBSD.org, ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060315204418.7AFAC22B59@mail.droso.net> References: <20060315204418.7AFAC22B59@mail.droso.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 04:47:36 +0000 Message-Id: <1142484456.1859.5.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently marked broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 04:47:42 -0000 Dear comitters... Please take a look at: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=93162 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/93507 saludos! Phillip El mié, 15-03-2006 a las 21:44 +0100, linimon@FreeBSD.org escribió: > Dear FreeBSD port maintainer: > > As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the > FreeBSD ports system, we are attempting to notify maintainers of > ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases > these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD > build environments. The most common problem is that recent versions > of -CURRENT include gcc3.4, which is much stricter about such things > as function declarations, literal strings constants that continue > over several physical lines, and forcing the deprecation of antique > header files such as varargs.h (we should now be using stdargs.h). > > The next most common problem is that compiles succeed on the i386 > architecture (e.g. the common Intel PC), but fail on one or more of > the other architectures due to assumptions about things such as size > of various types, byte-alignment issues, and so forth. > > In occasional cases we see that the same port may have different > errors in different build environments. The script that runs on the > build cluster uses heuristics to try to 'guess' the error type to > help you isolate problems, but it is only a rough guide. > > If you need help in one or more build environments that you do not > have access to, please ask for help on the freebsd-ports mailing > list. > > One more note: on occasion, there are transient build errors seen > on the build farm. Unfortunately, there is not yet any way for this > algorithm to tell the difference (humans are much, much better at > this kind of thing.) > > The errors are listed below. In the case where the same > problem exists on more than one build environment, the URL points > to the latest errorlog for that type. (By 'build environment' > here we mean 'combination of 4.x/5.x/6.x with target architecture'.) > > (Note: the dates are included to help you to gauge whether or not > the error still applies to the latest version. The program > that generates this report is not yet able to determine this > automatically.) > > portname: x11-themes/icons-tango > broken because: Incomplete pkg-plist > build errors: > http://pointyhat.FreeBSD.org/errorlogs/sparc64-errorlogs/e.7.2006012302/icons-tango-0.6.7.log (Feb 22 10:49:05 UTC 2006) > overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=x11-themes&portname=icons-tango > > > If these errors are ones that you are already aware of, please > accept our apologies and ignore this message. On the other hand, if > you no longer wish to maintain this port (or ports), please reply > with a message stating that, and accept our thanks for your efforts > in the past. > > Every effort has been made to make sure that these error reports > really do correspond to a port that you maintain. However, due to > the fact that this is an automated process, it may indeed generate > false matches. If one of these errors fits that description, > please forward this email to the author of this software, Mark > Linimon , so that he can attempt to fix the > problem in the future. > > Thanks for your efforts to help improve FreeBSD.