Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:25:30 -0500 From: DAve <dave.list@pixelhammer.com> To: 'User Questions' <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cgiwrap Message-ID: <4B58AA2A.3010904@pixelhammer.com> In-Reply-To: <20100121195143.b079dc4b.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <4B588E62.7020604@pixelhammer.com> <20100121195143.b079dc4b.freebsd@edvax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Polytropon wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:26:58 -0500, DAve <dave.list@pixelhammer.com> wrote: >> Anyone using cgiwrap? > > No, so I may just give a quite generic advice, erm, guess. :-) > >> I am unable to get it to work. It continues to >> claim it is not set uid root, but it is. >> >> -rwsr-xr-x 2 root nogroup 92396 Jan 21 11:33 cgiwrap > ^^^^^^^ > Is "nogroup" intended? Check Yes, my apache runs as nobody:nogroup on this server. I had changed it to root:bin as it was set with sbox, and left it as root:root (as set by the makefile), no difference. > > % ls -lno cgiwrap -rwsr-xr-x 2 0 65533 - 92396 Jan 21 11:33 cgiwrap > > for anything untypical for a SUID executable. > > Furthermore, it would be helpful to know the full error > message (if any). Sure, "The cgiwrap executable(s) were not made setuid-root. This is required for it to function properly. (SetUID root is needed in order to change the uid to that of the script owner. This is an installation error please make the executable setuid root, or use the 'make install' method of installing the executables. " Which I tried second. First I used the port cgiwrap with the above result, then I built it myself and got the same error. Stumped... DAve -- "Posterity, you will know how much it cost the present generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it. If you do not, I shall repent in heaven that ever I took half the pains to preserve it." John Adams http://appleseedinfo.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B58AA2A.3010904>