From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org  Sun Jul 31 18:16:00 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E24BAA81A
 for <freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sun, 31 Jul 2016 18:16:00 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net)
Received: from puchar.net (puchar.net [194.1.144.90])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "puchar.net", Issuer "puchar.net" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F846136C;
 Sun, 31 Jul 2016 18:15:59 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net)
Received: Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by puchar.net (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id u6VIFv52009612
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
 Sun, 31 Jul 2016 20:15:57 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net)
Received: from laptop.wojtek.intra (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by laptop.wojtek.intra (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u6VIFqj8007373;
 Sun, 31 Jul 2016 20:15:52 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
 by laptop.wojtek.intra (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id u6VIFl5A007370;
 Sun, 31 Jul 2016 20:15:47 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net)
X-Authentication-Warning: laptop.wojtek.intra: wojtek owned process doing -bs
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 20:15:46 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@puchar.net>
X-X-Sender: wojtek@laptop.wojtek.intra
To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=B3a?= <trasz@FreeBSD.org>
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: can anyone explain how UFS ACLs work actually
In-Reply-To: <90C9626E-6A77-4314-AD01-A1148BEA3112@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1607312015150.7359@laptop.wojtek.intra>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1607281851140.12631@laptop.wojtek.intra>
 <90C9626E-6A77-4314-AD01-A1148BEA3112@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
 (puchar.net [10.0.1.1]); Sun, 31 Jul 2016 20:15:57 +0200 (CEST)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 18:16:00 -0000

>>
>> added some entries and default entries for one directory. added say user john with rwx permissions
>
> You need NFSv4 ACLs for Windows, not the POSIX ones.  (And, generally speaking, 49% of Samba code for dealing with permissions is unused and obsolete, while another 49% is useless and harmful; the trick is to configure the latter to do as little as possible.)
what i possibly done by disabling

nt acl support = no

Now samba just respect ACLs i've set from unix shell. And nothing more. 
Exactly what i wanted