From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Nov  9 17:19: 1 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CE7A237B479; Thu,  9 Nov 2000 17:18:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kiwi.itojun.org (localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1])
	by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W/smtpfeed 1.06) with ESMTP id KAA08128;
	Fri, 10 Nov 2000 10:18:56 +0900 (JST)
To: Lars Eggert <larse@ISI.EDU>, Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@mahoroba.org>,
	casonc@netplex.aussie.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org,
	freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, xbone@ISI.EDU
In-reply-to: itojun's message of Fri, 10 Nov 2000 10:07:49 JST.
      <7886.973818469@coconut.itojun.org>
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD  90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2
Subject: Re: Bug or feature ?
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 10:18:56 +0900
Message-ID: <8126.973819136@coconut.itojun.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>>Itojun, do you agree with this? What problems did you see in merging the
>>bugfix into FreeBSD? Maybe I missed something.
>	please DO test the new fix and report.
>	otherwise i don't feel like bringing it in.

	on a second thought, if the time constraint is critical, go ahead and
	bring in 1.82 -> 1.83....

itojun


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message