From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 21 05:43:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49AC16A4CE for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 05:43:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (mailout1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091EE43D46 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 05:43:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from langd@informatik.tu-muenchen.de) Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:43:54 +0200 From: Daniel Lang To: Stuart Barkley Message-ID: <20040421124354.GC64739@atrbg11.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> References: <4084F85B.5070909@delit.net> <20040420102632.GA36668@e-Gitt.NET> <20040420121423.GA1154@frontfree.net> <20040420125025.GA30066@energistic.com> <20040420130803.GC62962@atrbg11.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> <20040420125206.C22417@freeman.4gh.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040420125206.C22417@freeman.4gh.net> X-Geek: GCS/CC d-- s: a- C++$ UBS++++$ P+++$ L- E-(---) W+++(--) N++ o K w--- O? M? V? PS+(++) PE--(+) Y+ PGP+ t++ 5+++ X R+(-) tv+ b+ DI++ D++ G++ e+++ h---(-) r++>+++ y+ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.tu-muenchen.de cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A way to recover deleted files (just contents) from USF2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 12:43:56 -0000 Hi, Stuart Barkley wrote on Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 12:53:15PM -0400: > On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 at 15:08 +0200, Daniel Lang wrote: > > > simple solution: > > > > alias rm="rm -i" > > s/simple/horrible/ > > Go ahead and set this up on your system and start relying upon it. > Then help a friend on his system and wipe out all his files because > you started relying upon the non-standard behavior. Ok, I should have added some ";-)" signs. But I did say that I would _not_ recommend this. However, an 'unrm' feature based on UFS-snapshots, lazy unlinking or shell-functions would be a similar 'non-standard' behaviour and not any better in this regard. Best regards, Daniel -- IRCnet: Mr-Spock - May His Shadow fall upon thee - Daniel Lang * dl@leo.org * +49 89 289 18532 * http://www.leo.org/~dl/