Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 6 Dec 1997 10:35:01 -0500 (EST)
From:      "David E. Cross" <dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu>
To:        Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net>
Cc:        Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: The 'Stable' status of freeBSD-stable
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.971206103317.14058A-100000@phoenix.its.rpi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <l03110701b0aee43bb353@[208.2.87.4]>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 6 Dec 1997, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:

> I agree. The change of interface should have been caused a bump to 2.3.
> If I need the latest kernel patch (eg the Intel bug fix), I should
> be able to simply update my source tree and compile a new kernel. PERIOD.
> NOTHING else should have to be changed.

On that note, has Intel's further nasty abomination^W^W^Wpatch be commited
to 2.2.5-stable yet... I looked for it in the LINT kernel, but could not
find it.

--
David Cross
ACS Consulatn




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.971206103317.14058A-100000>