From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 26 04:15:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4CD16A41F for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 04:15:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aquatique@rusunix.org) Received: from rusunix.org (rusunix.org [212.118.165.104]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631E643D48 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 04:15:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aquatique@rusunix.org) Received: by rusunix.org (Postfix, from userid 1111) id D82A7228737; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 06:13:14 +0200 (CEST) From: "Evgueni V. Gavrilov" To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <1125023574.72285.TMDA@seddon.ca> X-Newsgroups: freebsd.net User-Agent: tin/1.7.8-20050321 ("Hellisay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/7.0-CURRENT (i386)) Message-Id: <20050826041314.D82A7228737@rusunix.org> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 06:13:14 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Subject: Re: Aggregate network interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 04:15:28 -0000 In article <1125023574.72285.TMDA@seddon.ca> you wrote: > IP addresses. It would be cool to have something like Etherchannel, but > that doesn't work. Solaris has Etherchannel. you missed ng_fec(4) which runs fine for me with Catalyst 3750 stack (Cisco WS-C3750G-24TS) (gigabit ethernet) -- http://aquatique.rusunix.org