From owner-cvs-all Tue Feb 26 14:12:50 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from beppo.feral.com (beppo.feral.com [192.67.166.79]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A1137B41A; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 14:12:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhost.feral.com (mjacob@mailhost.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by beppo.feral.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g1QMCSf05466; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 14:12:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 14:12:28 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob X-Sender: mjacob@beppo Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: Robert Watson Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 exception.s genassym.c machdep.c mp_machdep.c mpapic.c swtch.s vm_machdep.c src/sys/i386/include cpufunc.h pcb.h src/sys/i386/isa apic_vector.s clock.c icu_vector.s intr_machdep.c intr_machdep.h npx.c src/sys/kern ... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I think I already responded in -current. Why there rather than cvs-*, oh, well, whatever you think best. On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > I would also like to have core take a stand that having code in P4 isn NOT > > > the same as publishing it. P4 is an aid to the developer to do PRIVATE > > > work. As long as the work is in P4 it is up to the developer to > > > keep it in sync with -current. From the project's perspective > > > work in P4 doesn't exist. > > > > FWIW, concur. > > Per Julian's request, I've reposted my solicitation for comments on the > version control system issue on -current. I would appreciate it if you'd > send responses to that. The goal is to end up with a set of guidelines > for people who choose to use an external version control system so that > they can know they're taking reasonable steps to publicize and expose > their work in an appropriate and project-centric way. I think one can't > completely rule out collaboration in P4 -- for example, the TrustedBSD > component of the Perforce repository really does represent the best way to > get the work done. On the other hand, that's not necessarily any > different from a few people working on a project who use an external CVS > repository. Please give a few minutes thought, take a look at the > suggestions in my e-mail, and respond there. > > Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project > robert@fledge.watson.org NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message