Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 09:29:57 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Dag-Erling =?unknown-8bit?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= <des@des.no> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 UPDATING src/cddl/lib Makefile src/cddl/usr.bin Makefile src/cddl/usr.sbin Makefile src/lib Makefile src/lib/libkse Makefile kse.map pthread.map src/lib/libkse/arch/amd64 Makefile.inc src/lib/libkse/arch/amd64/amd64 ... Message-ID: <20071010162957.GB12085@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <86ve9ffcek.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <200710091342.l99DgZDB097501@repoman.freebsd.org> <86ve9ffcek.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 01:16:03PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote: > "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > Log: > > Repo copy libpthreads to libkse. > > This introduces the WITHOUT_LIBKSE nob, > > and changes WITHOUT_LIBPTHREADS to mean with neither threading libs. > > Approved by: re(kensmith) > > Was the SHLIB_MAJOR regression for libkse (from 3 to 0) intentional? I wouldn't call it a regression - we've never had a libkse.so.0 - and we've never shipped a libkse.so AFAIK. Now with symbol versioning, we don't need to bump SHLIB_MAJOR anymore. I thought about using libkse.so.1, but that is already in ObsoleteFiles.inc, and I didn't want to get into what's the right changes for that file if I could avoid it. Shipping a libkse.so.3 in 7.0, would be yet another FreeBSD weirdism as folks may wonder where .1 & 2 are. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon? Let's not play "Jeopardy-style quoting"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071010162957.GB12085>