Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 20:05:17 -0500 From: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> To: "Charles Burns" <burnscharlesn@hotmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can FreeBSD do this... Message-ID: <02022520051702.01642@proxy.pt.com> In-Reply-To: <F112bh6HQFb7a2cO2Wt0000961b@hotmail.com> References: <F112bh6HQFb7a2cO2Wt0000961b@hotmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 25 February 2002 19:47, Charles Burns wrote: > >while I've never seen > > a Windows system that would run in this capacity for any length of time > >without > > handholding from the sysadmin. It should be possible, but I've never > >seen > > it (I think it's a problem with the Windows sysadmins more than Windows > > itself) > > Job security? ;-) Could be, I've seen the same phenomonon (sp? I'm too lazy to check) with other systems, SGI for example - not that there's anything wrong with IRIX, but the folks that were supposed to be supporting it did such a lousy job that the company that was using it will never purchase an SGI box again. -- Bill Moran Potential Technology technical services http://www.potentialtech.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?02022520051702.01642>