Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:48:35 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/gcc gcc.1 Message-ID: <20041111144834.GA735@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> In-Reply-To: <200411110745.iAB7j1tj085796@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200411110745.iAB7j1tj085796@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2004-11-11 07:45, "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Don't attempt to claim what version of GCC we're documenting. The manpage > is still mostly the GCC 2.95 one, with faint attempts by me over the years > to document a few new switches. Thus, it is dubious to claim documentation > of specific modern GCC versions. > > Noted by: delphij > > Revision Changes Path > 1.20 +1 -1 src/contrib/gcc/gcc.1 Does it make sense to attempt writing an mdoc manpage for a more modern version of gcc, using the info manuals as the source?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041111144834.GA735>