Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 13 Nov 2017 10:02:45 -0500
From:      Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>
To:        Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [HEADS UP] posix_fallocate support removed from ZFS, lld affected
Message-ID:  <CAPyFy2DBOm%2BmXE=fKj%2BuHMGojnPKPrpiz-y2mMKXyg58-%2BeWHQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <153bfe2b-e65e-2036-3391-984c6ba00ffe@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <7e5599e4-2faa-29b6-4fb2-a0744a12681a@FreeBSD.org> <1509989176.99235.79.camel@freebsd.org> <153bfe2b-e65e-2036-3391-984c6ba00ffe@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7 November 2017 at 13:12, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> I hope that lld is not that widely used now.
> But I admit that I put the cart before the horse.
> I didn't expect that posix_fallocate is used in the development toolchain and I
> didn't try to check for it.

For amd64 it is probably not a very large problem; it's not used by
default and those who have enabled it can likely adapt. However, it is
used by arm64 and is the default linker in FreeBSD 11.1, so we'll need
to go with either an errata fix or Kostik's p_osrel suggestion to
avoid breaking the package builds.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2DBOm%2BmXE=fKj%2BuHMGojnPKPrpiz-y2mMKXyg58-%2BeWHQ>