Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 14:44:49 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: at_shutdown going away Message-ID: <199908212044.OAA48478@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 21 Aug 1999 12:51:29 PDT." <199908211951.MAA00837@dingo.cdrom.com> References: <199908211951.MAA00837@dingo.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199908211951.MAA00837@dingo.cdrom.com> Mike Smith writes: : > In message <199908190737.AAA04137@dingo.cdrom.com> Mike Smith writes: : > : Seriously though, I'm in the process of replacing a number of the : > : ad-hoc event handler callout lists in the kernel (most notably the : > : at_shutdown and apm* lists) with a generic implementation. : > : > Shouldn't the apm stuff use the new-bus hooks? I've migraded a couple : > of uses in pccard to using that now that I have newbus node to hang : > them off of... : : APM is only attached to the ISA bus for crufty reasons; I'm going to : take it off shortly and use the kernel environment to pass it options. No. You misunderstand me. I'm talking about the device_suspend and device_remove methods which get called for all attached devices on suspend and remove. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908212044.OAA48478>