From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Feb 22 1:40:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from hand.dotat.at (sfo-gw.covalent.net [207.44.198.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 233E837B67D for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 01:40:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fanf@dotat.at) Received: from fanf by hand.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.20 #3) id 14VsEp-0003IR-00; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:40:39 +0000 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:40:39 +0000 From: Tony Finch To: Terry Lambert Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Netscape story Message-ID: <20010222094039.B9337@hand.dotat.at> References: <20010222075131.A9337@hand.dotat.at> <200102220925.CAA10847@usr05.primenet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200102220925.CAA10847@usr05.primenet.com> Organization: Covalent Technologies, Inc Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Terry Lambert wrote: > >I was trying to use it to describe the mutually arrived at >community, which I meant in terms of a communications forum, >not the mindshare that competing ideas in that forum can grab. Yes, that was clear, and I've seen it used in that way elsewhere. >When I think of Schelling points first, then the examples that >come to mind first is the "README" file; there was no convention >in which communication between companies and customers both >decided that the file with important last minute things in it >would be named "README"; it just sort of emerged. Yes, that's a nice example :-) Tony. -- f.a.n.finch fanf@covalent.net dot@dotat.at ROCKALL MALIN: NORTHWESTERLY 4 OR 5, OCCASIONALLY 6 OR 7 IN NORTH LATER. RAIN THEN SHOWERS. MODERATE BECOMING GOOD. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message