Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 7 Jun 2013 13:40:00 +0200
From:      Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Tijl Coosemans <tijl@coosemans.org>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.org, Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: [HEADSUP] dialog4ports does not popup anymore only for global options
Message-ID:  <20130607113959.GI35160@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
In-Reply-To: <51B1B9F0.2030206@coosemans.org>
References:  <20130607081210.GD35160@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <51B1A5D8.8070906@gmail.com> <20130607094227.GE35160@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <51B1B2D5.8020901@gmail.com> <20130607101758.GF35160@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <51B1B9F0.2030206@coosemans.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--e5GLnnZ8mDMEwH4V
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 12:46:08PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On 2013-06-07 12:17, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:15:49PM +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> >> Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >>>> Is it possible to still show the dialog if one of those options impl=
ies
> >>>> additional dependencies?
> >>>>
> >>>> If not, what should those of us who do not want them installed do?
> >>>
> >>> make config will always show those options so you can always tune the=
m.
> >>>
> >>> just make config-conditional will not fireup a new dialog automatical=
ly if the
> >>> defined options are only those from the global options.
> >>
> >> I see. As far as I can tell though, and correct me if I'm wrong, but
> >> 'make install' doesn't show those options. It also does not show those
> >> options for dependent ports. Neither does 'make config-recursive'.
> >>
> >> Tools like portmaster will now ignore those as well during install and
> >> reinstall.
> >>
> >> So, again, what are my options if I don't want dependencies to be pull=
ed
> >> in silently?
> >=20
> > You have no options and you never had one in the ports tree sorry.
> >=20
> > If you have a way to implement that cleanly, I'll be happy to push such=
 features
> > in the ports but really I see a way to do what you ask for.
>=20
> How about only suppressing the dialog if the options have been explicitly
> set or unset in make.conf?
>=20

That would be easy but is that a really desired feature?

regards,
Bapt

--e5GLnnZ8mDMEwH4V
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlGxxo8ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzoxACggLRliWcJKFIh8PvXHjLLWOHx
u14AnjTDWpkVlJYfy/1l7EClsbSH41bf
=wSE8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--e5GLnnZ8mDMEwH4V--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130607113959.GI35160>