From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 7 09:08:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id B54B8B92; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 09:08:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 09:08:40 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Martin Wilke Subject: Re: svn commit: r347338 - in head/net-p2p: . microdc2 microdc2/files Message-ID: <20140307090840.GB98331@FreeBSD.org> References: <201403070625.s276PGbO062948@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: "svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org" , "svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org" , ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 09:08:40 -0000 On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 04:41:45PM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote: > while you restore the port, should you not at least take over the port? Not sure; I thought of it, but then don't know what current maintainer thinks about this. I have a few patches from Debian/Gentoo/Arch to add to the port; once I'm happy with it, I'll ping Pavel and ask why he let the port to get moved, and if he's still willing to maintain it. ./danfe