Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 7 Mar 2014 17:12:46 +0800
From:      Martin Wilke <miwi.fbsd@gmail.com>
To:        Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        "svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org" <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>, "svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org" <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r347338 - in head/net-p2p: . microdc2 microdc2/files
Message-ID:  <7A2A804C-B978-4259-9945-27A764EC9AB7@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140307090840.GB98331@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201403070625.s276PGbO062948@svn.freebsd.org> <CAFY%2ByE=w9rvhzdcC8q2tZvyFQrFQMrxjQ1W7JG4s1rsf-kvtnA@mail.gmail.com> <20140307090840.GB98331@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Mar 7, 2014, at 5:08 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 04:41:45PM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
>> while you restore the port, should you not at least take over the =
port?
>=20
> Not sure; I thought of it, but then don't know what current maintainer
> thinks about this.
>=20

Next time you may ask first, the reason is the port got removed for =
reason,
so if its end up soon or later with ports@ it would have been better to =
let it in attic :).

> I have a few patches from Debian/Gentoo/Arch to add to the port; once =
I'm
> happy with it, I'll ping Pavel and ask why he let the port to get =
moved,
> and if he's still willing to maintain it.

Thanks.

>=20
> ./danfe

+-----------------oOO--(_)--OOo-------------------------+
With best Regards,
       Martin Wilke (miwi_(at)_FreeBSD.org)

Mess with the Best, Die like the Rest




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7A2A804C-B978-4259-9945-27A764EC9AB7>