From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 00:08:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1597A16A403 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:08:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@budostore.de) Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de (mo-p00-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A2643C9D for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:07:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from news@budostore.de) Received: from nor75-5-82-235-173-77.fbx.proxad.net (nor75-5-82-235-173-77.fbx.proxad.net [82.235.173.77]) by post.webmailer.de (mrclete mo64) (RZmta 3.8) with ESMTP id iB9K7DB300ca9G for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:08:49 +0100 (MET) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:08:49 +0100 (MET) From: Karl Sinn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200612082010.42744.news@budostore.de> <200612092204.53800.news@budostore.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200612100100.59207.news@budostore.de> X-RZG-AUTH: ibDpgOm8RLcSc5zBxTj4 Subject: Re: Configuration of Grub? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:08:51 -0000 Hi, Am Samstag, 9. Dezember 2006 23:19 schrieb David Stanford: > title FreeBSD > root (hd1,0,a) > kernel /boot/loader This worked. But I have to say, I don't know why. It is the third harddisk in the system, and it's definitifly the slave on the second IDE-port. During the installation I had to identify the disk with ad3. How can grub mix the harddisks up and set this one to hd1? Is there any logic behind? Anyway I already have the next problem: How to start KDE But I'll check the Handbook first and start a new thread if I don't manage. Thanks for all the help and information Karl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 00:13:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724C416A407 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:13:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout7.cac.washington.edu (mxout7.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332A343C9D for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:12:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.141]) by mxout7.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBA0DpZ5016670 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 16:13:51 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBA0DpLW001989 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 16:13:51 -0800 Message-ID: <457B513E.1080506@u.washington.edu> Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 16:13:50 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200612082010.42744.news@budostore.de> <200612090958.03581.news@budostore.de> <200612092204.53800.news@budostore.de> <457B417E.9030506@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2006.12.9.155932 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: Configuration of Grub? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:13:52 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Stanford wrote: >> Incorrect. If you installed the filesystem on ad3s1, it should be: >> >> root (hd3,0,a) > > > Thank you, I stand corrected. Not sure what I was thinking there... :) > > Many people goof up GRUB by accident because it's numbering system is >> zero-based and linux-like to a certain extent, so /dev/hda in Linux >> translates to hd0 in GRUB, which is also ad0 in FreeBSD. > > > This now leads me to a thought: does Grub count only *existing* hard drives > on your system or does it count the hard drive channels on your system? In > this case, Karl says he has installed FreeBSD on ad3, which makes me think > he has installed on a second SATA drive (more likely that on a fourth hard > drive I would think), and FreeBSD has counted two IDE channels as ad0 and > ad1, and two SATA channels as ad2 and ad3. If this is the case, and Grub > counts only the *existing* drives on his system, then he would have to use > (hd1,0,a), no? This would also explain the "disk is not existing" error he > was recieving. > > I'd be interested in hearing thoughts (or facts ;) on this as I hate being > left confused... :) > > -David Good question; not sure about that one, since the BIOS may or may not count the EIDE channels as 0 and 1, and the SATA as 2 and 3. Needless to say, this little numbering scheme with grub has become confusing, esp with the introduction of new technology (SATA) >.>. Not sure how numbering would work with SCSI either (something I should try sometime), because I don't know how the BIOS numbers drives with SCSI cards or SATA drives put into the mix. As an example, I'll use my Linux box (which has just EIDE drives in it): Filesystem (as basis for understanding what's going on): sprsd gcooper # fdisk -l Disk /dev/hda: 80.0 GB, 80000000000 bytes 16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 155009 cylinders Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 = 516096 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 1 18601 9374872+ 83 Linux Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary. /dev/hda2 18602 20799 1107508+ 83 Linux Partition 2 does not end on cylinder boundary. /dev/hda3 * 20799 53311 16386300 7 HPFS/NTFS Partition 3 does not end on cylinder boundary. /dev/hda4 53311 155009 51255823+ 5 Extended Partition 4 does not end on cylinder boundary. /dev/hda5 53312 53427 58432+ 83 Linux /dev/hda6 53428 155009 51197328 83 Linux For determining what's what, he could just load up the grub shell and type in... grub> root (hd0,0) Filesystem type is reiserfs, partition type 0x83 Note that it says what the partition type is and so you have an idea of where you are and what's going on. Yet, GRUB's understanding is limited because it doesn't directly understand NTFS, and hence I think that's what the chainloader command is present when booting Windows since it passes the ball for loading the OS to NTLDR (although a more technical document could help tell why): grub> root (hd0,1) Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0x83 - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFe1E+6CkrZkzMC68RAliBAJsHgkz/MlQ2tTHTvEkRZ4S64OWa6ACggsmu RgVBQbEE0IR74tInOPTX0RM= =Mch+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 00:24:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8432716A407 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:24:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1328843CA0 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:23:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBA0Lqff057498; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 19:21:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kBA0LqR5057497; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 19:21:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 19:21:52 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Marwan Sultan Message-ID: <20061210002151.GA57436@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <200612091303.07429.dmw@unete.cl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: dmw@unete.cl, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: error ouput of fsck X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:24:30 -0000 On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 09:55:06PM +0000, Marwan Sultan wrote: > Hello Daniel, > > The problem, is why its happening ? > > Also the other server had this sudden diffrent output > > 192# fsck > ** /dev/ad8s1a (NO WRITE) > ** Last Mounted on / > ** Root file system > ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes > ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames > ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity > ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts > ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups > 1492 files, 29045 used, 10125154 free (706 frags, 1265556 blocks, 0.0% > fragmentation) > ** /dev/ad8s1e (NO WRITE) > ** Last Mounted on /tmp > ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes > ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames > ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity > UNREF DIR I=659456 OWNER=admin MODE=40700 > SIZE=512 MTIME=Dec 10 00:46 2006 > RECONNECT? no > > ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts > LINK COUNT DIR I=659456 OWNER=admin MODE=40700 > SIZE=512 MTIME=Dec 10 00:46 2006 COUNT 2 SHOULD BE 1 > ADJUST? no > > UNREF FILE I=659457 OWNER=admin MODE=140755 > SIZE=0 MTIME=Dec 10 00:46 2006 > RECONNECT? no > > > CLEAR? no > Hmmm. RECONNECT? no ADJUST? no CLEAR? no Why are you responding 'no' to each prompt to fix things? If you keep doing that it will never get the file systems cleared up. ////jerry > ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups > 43 files, 24 used, 7615615 free (175 frags, 951930 blocks, 0.0% > fragmentation) > ** /dev/ad8s1f (NO WRITE) > ** Last Mounted on /usr > ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes > UNKNOWN FILE TYPE I=7918875 > UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY > > CLEAR? no > > ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames > DUP/BAD I=7918875 OWNER=root MODE=40755 > SIZE=512 MTIME=Nov 16 15:29 2006 > DIR=/ports/math/ump > > UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY > > REMOVE? no > > fsck_ufs: cannot find inode 7918875 > > > > >On Saturday 09 December 2006 11:48, Marwan Sultan wrote: > >> Hello Gurus, > >> > >> Im on FreeBSD 6.1R-p10, Box acting as NAT/gateway. > >> I have mysql, freeradius, chillispot installed all working > >> okay. > >> > >> Every like 2-3 weeks my box become slow...internet sharing > >> works and stops, > >> timeout, page cannot be displayed... and when i dig in the > >> logs... i see really nothing.. > >> no i mean nothing! but 1 strange thing.. my radius log says > >> the follow > >> > >> Sat Dec 9 16:51:18 2006 : Info: Ready to process requests. > >> Sat Dec 9 17:26:30 2006 : Info: rlm_sql (sql): Trying to > >> (re)connect unconnected handle 4.. > >> Sat Dec 9 17:26:30 2006 : Info: rlm_sql_mysql: Starting > >> connect to MySQL server for #4 > >> Sat Dec 9 17:26:30 2006 : Info: rlm_sql (sql): got socket 4 > >> after skipping 0 unconnected handles, tried to reconnect 1 > >> though > >> Sat Dec 9 17:26:30 2006 : Info: rlm_sql (sql): Trying to > >> (re)connect unconnected handle 3.. > >> Sat Dec 9 17:26:30 2006 : Info: rlm_sql_mysql: Starting > >> connect to MySQL server for #3 > >> Sat Dec 9 17:26:30 2006 : Info: rlm_sql (sql): got socket 3 > >> after skipping 0 unconnected handles, tried to reconnect 1 > >> though > >> Sat Dec 9 17:26:30 2006 : Info: rlm_sql (sql): Trying to > >> (re)connect unconnected handle 2.. > >> Sat Dec 9 17:26:30 2006 : Info: rlm_sql_mysql: Starting > >> connect to MySQL server for #2 > >> Sat Dec 9 17:26:30 2006 : Info: rlm_sql (sql): got socket 2 > >> after skipping 0 unconnected handles, tried to reconnect 1 > >> though > >> Sat Dec 9 17:26:30 2006 : Info: rlm_sql (sql): Trying to > >> (re)connect unconnected handle 1.. > >> Sat Dec 9 17:26:30 2006 : Info: rlm_sql_mysql: Starting > >> connect to MySQL server for #1 > >> Sat Dec 9 17:26:30 2006 : Info: rlm_sql (sql): got socket 1 > >> after skipping 0 unconnected handles, tried to reconnect 1 > >> though > >> > >> However, maybe the previous log, is not freebsd concerns..but > >> for a while i was thinking why > >> isql giving such an error, in the time its working and its > >> up. really no logs.. > >> I tried to do fsck.. and here its...SUPERBLK errors.. and i > >> cannot understand why @ > >> can someone kindly look into these fsck output and explain > >> for me please? why and how to solve.. > >> what makes it more wierd, that after 2 or 3 weeks, another > >> server on diffrent network > >> had _same_problem_exactly_, any explains please? > >> > >> 192# fsck -y > >> ** /dev/ad7s1a (NO WRITE) > >> ** Last Mounted on / > >> ** Root file system > >> ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes > >> ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames > >> ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity > >> ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts > >> ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups > >> 1493 files, 29211 used, 7586428 free (740 frags, 948211 > >> blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) > >> ** /dev/ad7s1d (NO WRITE) > >> ** Last Mounted on /tmp > >> ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes > >> ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames > >> ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity > >> ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts > >> ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups > >> 38 files, 21 used, 7615618 free (154 frags, 951933 blocks, > >> 0.0% fragmentation) > >> ** /dev/ad7s1f (NO WRITE) > >> ** Last Mounted on /usr > >> ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes > >> ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames > >> ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity > >> ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts > >> ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups > >> 233993 files, 1179379 used, 38959217 free (47889 frags, > >> 4863916 blocks, 0.1% fragmentation) > >> ** /dev/ad7s1e (NO WRITE) > >> ** Last Mounted on /var > >> ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes > >> ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames > >> ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity > >> ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts > >> UNREF FILE I=376867 OWNER=mysql MODE=100600 > >> SIZE=0 MTIME=Dec 9 16:51 2006 > >> CLEAR? no > >> > >> UNREF FILE I=376868 OWNER=mysql MODE=100600 > >> SIZE=0 MTIME=Dec 9 16:51 2006 > >> CLEAR? no > >> > >> UNREF FILE I=376869 OWNER=mysql MODE=100600 > >> SIZE=0 MTIME=Dec 9 16:51 2006 > >> CLEAR? no > >> > >> UNREF FILE I=376870 OWNER=mysql MODE=100600 > >> SIZE=0 MTIME=Dec 9 16:51 2006 > >> CLEAR? no > >> > >> UNREF FILE I=1530904 OWNER=root MODE=100644 > >> SIZE=0 MTIME=Dec 9 16:51 2006 > >> CLEAR? no > >> > >> ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups > >> SUMMARY BLK COUNT(S) WRONG IN SUPERBLK > >> SALVAGE? no > >> > >> 1464 files, 29446 used, 7586194 free (506 frags, 948211 > >> blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) > >> 192# > > > > Try booting in single user mode, and then unmounting all > >units: > > # umount -a > > # fsck -y > > # mount -a > > > > If the last command goes well, the file system check is > >done... > > > >> _____________________________________________________________ > >>____ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download > >> today it's FREE! > >> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/0 > >>1/ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > >Best regards, > >-- > > . 0 . | Daniel Molina Wegener > > . . 0 | dmw at unete dot cl > > 0 0 0 | FreeBSD User > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _________________________________________________________________ > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 00:31:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697EB16A403 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:31:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tshadwick@oss-solutions.com) Received: from moogle.hksilver.net (mail.hksilver.net [208.231.66.99]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0240143CA2 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:30:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tshadwick@oss-solutions.com) Received: from [172.16.30.8] (chibi.shadwick.home [172.16.30.8]) (authenticated bits=0) by moogle.hksilver.net (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBA0Vgr9080334 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 9 Dec 2006 18:31:45 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tshadwick@oss-solutions.com) Message-ID: <457B556C.4000707@oss-solutions.com> Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 18:31:40 -0600 From: Tony Shadwick User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5.0.2 (Macintosh/20060310) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dick hoogendijk References: <1165691646.3362.4.camel@arwen> <6.0.0.22.2.20061209145320.024fed40@mail.computinginnovations.com> <1165698490.3362.15.camel@arwen> In-Reply-To: <1165698490.3362.15.camel@arwen> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Users Questions Subject: Re: X server remote login X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:31:46 -0000 I have to apologize, as I've never had x11 start automatically for me anyplace. That said, you need to understand that the server/client relationship for X11 is backwards to what you might expect. The display, keyboard, and mouse are at the x-server side, and the machine you connect to is the X-client. On the xserver, if you want it to happen automatically, you would put startx in your .login file. So if you wanted that flag passed, you would place startx -listen_tcp in your .login file. On the client side, you're running an x-client, I presume that gets started from /etc/rc.conf. There's probably something like xorg_enable="YES", and xorg_flags="blah", and you would put it in your xorg_flags statement. dick hoogendijk wrote: > On Sat, 2006-12-09 at 21:54, Derek Ragona wrote: >> By default in FreeBSD X doesn't listen for TCP requests. To change this do: >> startx -listen_tcp > > Thank you. But can this be made "permanent" somewhere? > I guess the tcp port (6000?) should be made inaccessible to the outside > world. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 00:37:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B1216A416 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:37:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dthomas53@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060FA43CA0 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:36:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dthomas53@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so1490005nfc for ; Sat, 09 Dec 2006 16:37:41 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=neMp/PVflV50sIL5zrUpFcTZDwIbtA9RbCw6eUoDaemkLECkKwED0yeimm1rEKTnqL2gI/MbViqv00xSXy0Jaqs7/sbHn+d2woWqjTwJ7dwdkrN/u7SLdF2jRO0+rcMy68CIkTWGr3xNG6gBDYtJbZVKpXvQak7C1XaKZPpUsbo= Received: by 10.78.178.5 with SMTP id a5mr2313554huf.1165711059933; Sat, 09 Dec 2006 16:37:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.156.2 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 16:37:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 19:37:39 -0500 From: "David Stanford" To: "Karl Sinn" In-Reply-To: <200612100100.59207.news@budostore.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200612082010.42744.news@budostore.de> <200612092204.53800.news@budostore.de> <200612100100.59207.news@budostore.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Configuration of Grub? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:37:43 -0000 On 12/9/06, Karl Sinn wrote: > > Hi, > > Am Samstag, 9. Dezember 2006 23:19 schrieb David Stanford: > > title FreeBSD > > root (hd1,0,a) > > kernel /boot/loader > > This worked. > > But I have to say, I don't know why. > It is the third harddisk in the system, and it's definitifly the slave on > the > second IDE-port. > > During the installation I had to identify the disk with ad3. > > How can grub mix the harddisks up and set this one to hd1? > Is there any logic behind? Can't definitively explain this one. I'm assuming your first IDE port has a CD/DVD drive and the first disk? The *only* guess I have is that Grub, in fact, does only count existing hard drives and didn't find one of the first two (for whatever reason). Other than that, I got nothing. Anyway, glad you got it working. Anyway I already have the next problem: How to start KDE > But I'll check the Handbook first and start a new thread if I don't > manage. > http://freebsd.kde.org/instructions.php Good luck! -David -- [root@fbsd ~]# fortune Happiness is just an illusion, filled with sadness and confusion. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 00:41:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0519416A47C for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dthomas53@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80DEF43CA7 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:40:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dthomas53@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so1490702nfc for ; Sat, 09 Dec 2006 16:41:26 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=LS14bOAoVI4VKwP5Q+ayoBZnrP7103WvRSoYUo+ORfPt//o+AGdBOoaKfYUeTGc4M87nqNC6KxQ7+tB8UeU4UqRmKGr8v4Mz7q+ajQltFCTsZUTmAOh2q3MVKkcn7YzBMotHNhqfAcyahPtmR3xNXcpSk1HllXk5OjqHHHY7y+U= Received: by 10.78.193.19 with SMTP id q19mr2341867huf.1165711286154; Sat, 09 Dec 2006 16:41:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.156.2 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 16:41:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 19:41:26 -0500 From: "David Stanford" To: "Garrett Cooper" In-Reply-To: <457B513E.1080506@u.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200612082010.42744.news@budostore.de> <200612090958.03581.news@budostore.de> <200612092204.53800.news@budostore.de> <457B417E.9030506@u.washington.edu> <457B513E.1080506@u.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Configuration of Grub? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:41:34 -0000 > Good question; not sure about that one, since the BIOS may or may not > count the EIDE channels as 0 and 1, and the SATA as 2 and 3. Needless to > say, this little numbering scheme with grub has become confusing, esp > with the introduction of new technology (SATA) >.>. Not sure how > numbering would work with SCSI either (something I should try sometime), > because I don't know how the BIOS numbers drives with SCSI cards or SATA > drives put into the mix. > Another good point. I suppose it's documented somewhere, but who has time to RTFM? :) -David -- [root@fbsd ~]# fortune Happiness is just an illusion, filled with sadness and confusion. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 01:53:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818C616A403 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:53:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pink_and_blue_the_clouds_above@hotmail.co.uk) Received: from bay0-omc3-s17.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc3-s17.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.217]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C793543CA4 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:52:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pink_and_blue_the_clouds_above@hotmail.co.uk) Received: from BAY124-W21 ([207.46.11.184]) by bay0-omc3-s17.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Sat, 9 Dec 2006 17:53:46 -0800 X-Originating-IP: [85.210.229.7] X-Originating-Email: [pink_and_blue_the_clouds_above@hotmail.co.uk] Message-ID: From: Robbie Bykowski To: Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:53:46 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Dec 2006 01:53:46.0084 (UTC) FILETIME=[07434240:01C71BFE] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Printing (Trying) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:53:46 -0000 I have been trying to get my Canon Pixma iP5000 to print on FreeBSD.I used = Apsfilter cause apparently its more user friendly then CUPS. I when through= all the settings and set everything up probably (i hope) as when i did a t= est print it printed, but it came out as an A5 size (is that normal?) on th= e A4. It had everything it should have on the test print so i did the I com= mand, gave it the name lp and then Q command and read what came after.I did= the:lpc restart alland came out with this:lp: no daemon to abort = printing enabled daemon restartedif i do it again it would come= the same as above.I then do lpr command:lpr linux.txtand does nothing.Any = help is thanked in advanced (I've been trying to do this for a long time)al= so with your help, i can get one step futher away from windows :DPink and B= lue=20 _________________________________________________________________ Be one of the first to try Windows Live Mail. http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=3D5d21c51a-b161-4314-9b0e-= 4911fb2b2e6d= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 03:19:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA7216A407 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 03:19:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4476843CA0 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 03:18:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBA3JIE2029450 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 19:19:18 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBA3JIup009140 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 19:19:18 -0800 Message-ID: <457B7CB5.40909@u.washington.edu> Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 19:19:17 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200612082010.42744.news@budostore.de> <200612090958.03581.news@budostore.de> <200612092204.53800.news@budostore.de> <457B417E.9030506@u.washington.edu> <457B513E.1080506@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2006.12.9.190432 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: Configuration of Grub? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 03:19:19 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Stanford wrote: >> Good question; not sure about that one, since the BIOS may or may not >> count the EIDE channels as 0 and 1, and the SATA as 2 and 3. Needless to >> say, this little numbering scheme with grub has become confusing, esp >> with the introduction of new technology (SATA) >.>. Not sure how >> numbering would work with SCSI either (something I should try sometime), >> because I don't know how the BIOS numbers drives with SCSI cards or SATA >> drives put into the mix. >> > > Another good point. I suppose it's documented somewhere, but who has > time to > RTFM? :) > > -David Erm... although I don't mind the examples, the documentation for GRUB seems a bit lacking (manpage yields almost nothing, but there's a bit in "info grub"). Though, specifics like this aren't really explained. - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFe3y16CkrZkzMC68RAjEKAJ0dkl9N9qVxC2uvt1mdGyyhKAFgLQCeIL1o PGwdKfJ8an0hwfgM+dybPZc= =jVLX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 03:31:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B9516A403 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 03:31:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF4943C9E for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 03:30:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBA3VQX5077991; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 20:31:26 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id kBA3VQKx077988; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 20:31:26 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 20:31:26 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Todd McNutt In-Reply-To: <000001c71a5b$5c45e8a0$6500a8c0@McLaptop> Message-ID: <20061209201701.B77842@wonkity.com> References: <000001c71a5b$5c45e8a0$6500a8c0@McLaptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 09 Dec 2006 20:31:26 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which one? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 03:31:29 -0000 On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Todd McNutt wrote: > I am hoping to install BSD on an IBM ThinkPad 600X that I have. It > has not been running the newer Windows and I popped a CD version of > Knoppix in it and it works fantastic. > > It got me thinking... I had used BSD in the past and I would like to > find an OS that I can actually 'install' on the hard drive and just > use the computer strictly as a BSD machine. Do you have a version of > BSD Free that will install and run on this machine? On my PII-233 Thinkpad 600, I've used FreeBSD 5.x and 6.x without problems. Maybe 4.x, too, can't recall. X11 worked fine. I didn't test any suspend or power save functions. You can check the FreeBSD Laptop Compatibility List at: http://gerda.univie.ac.at/freebsd-laptops/ Unfortunately, it seems to have been discovered by link spammers. Still, the original information looks intact. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 03:55:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1D516A412 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 03:55:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd.devil@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02CF543C9F for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 03:54:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd.devil@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so646152pyh for ; Sat, 09 Dec 2006 19:55:29 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=gY37wsBSAyYwZR8UJa3qQ1ItTwrjlYyYsHiyjn3UYoCIgN4MWvJo8ZhN3tGuC1vLF9dXi87JqQ1fjeM85MAB1IRSPxgyhY++olojZdcB3XqzQonbT3Oxmri7W6NImIZ/BHKCGQ9Ud2MxlIBL558P9dcaeE4QDsW8APN+OCK6P0c= Received: by 10.64.181.12 with SMTP id d12mr8466969qbf.1165722928930; Sat, 09 Dec 2006 19:55:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.224.17 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 19:55:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 22:55:28 -0500 From: "Vishal Patil" To: "perryh@pluto.rain.com" In-Reply-To: <457b2252.FSOx8QPMmmbOnRoI%perryh@pluto.rain.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <457b2252.FSOx8QPMmmbOnRoI%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Example network protocol implementation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 03:55:30 -0000 For implementing iSCSI protocol as a kernel driver. On 12/9/06, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > "Vishal Patil" wrote: > > > Could someone point me to an example that shows a SIMPLE network > > protocol implemented over TCP/IP inside the FreeBSD kernel. > > I think I could look at the NFS client driver but is there an > > example simpler than that. > > NFS normally runs over UDP, not TCP. Telnet is one of the simpler > TCP-based applications, but it is not done in the kernel (nor are > most network apps). Is there some particular reason why you need > an example that is implemented inside the kernel, vs in userland? > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 05:10:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E8716A403 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:10:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: from nyi.unixathome.org (nyi.unixathome.org [64.147.113.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D7143C9F for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:08:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4F5AB50872; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:10:02 -0500 (EST) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20061210051003.4F5AB50872@nyi.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:10:02 -0500 (EST) Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2006-11-19 - 2006-12-09 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:10:04 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . These are the articles posted during this period: 4-Dec : Putting sshd on a higher port Sometimes port 22 is just not convenient http://freebsddiary.org/ssh-higher-port.php?2 27-Nov : Everything got owned I woke up, and everything was gone http://freebsddiary.org/everything-got-owned.php?2 -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 05:27:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD3016A40F; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:27:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E6343C9F; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:26:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBA5OUw7065670; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 22:24:30 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 22:25:26 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20061209.222526.-816359937.imp@bsdimp.com> To: bsd.devil@gmail.com From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 09 Dec 2006 22:24:30 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Example network protocol implementation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:27:25 -0000 In message: "Vishal Patil" writes: : Could someone point me to an example that shows a SIMPLE network protocol : implemented over TCP/IP inside the FreeBSD kernel. I think I could look at : the NFS client driver but is there an example simpler than that. Also is : there a guide explaining how to go about developing TCP/IP based network : protocols for FreeBSD. [ to implement iSCSI in the kernel ] I'm unsure which side you wish to be on. There's accept filters that you can write, but I doubt that's what you want to do. This would be good if you are implementing an iSCSI target on FreeBSD, maybe (then again, maybe not). If you want to be an iSCSI initiator (I think that's the right term), then you'll need to do things similar to what sys/nfsclient/nfs_socket.c does. I could do a quick code walkthrough, but you'd likely be better off studying the nfs code since it will give you a better understanding than I can in a few lines. In addition, because locking has changed over time, the exact version matters. Careful study will show differences in what locks are needed, if any. But in a nutshell, you call socreate to get a socket. You setup the various fields in the socket data structures. You call sosetopt to do the latter. sobind will set this host's endpoint, and soconnect will connect the socket to the remote side. You'll need to setup send and receive buffers and manage them with soreceive and sosend. there's some callbacks that also need to be established as well. And some socket layer locking that may be exposed to your code because there are so few in-kernel protocol implementations that aren't peers to TCP, UDP or IP. I hope this helps. Warner From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 05:40:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350FC16A417; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:40:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9015943CA0; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:39:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E107118B480; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:40:23 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04657-06; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:40:23 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-137-79-174.eastlink.ca [24.137.79.174]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD29118B47A; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:36:48 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D36B13E2EA; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:36:48 -0400 (AST) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:36:48 -0400 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org Subject: BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER over an SSH connection ... what is the sequence? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:40:25 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I swore I had it saved here somewhere, but can't seem to find it in my mailboxes :( I have an HP Proliant DL360 G4p server (well, a few, actually), that allow for getting a remote console via ssh ... I have DDB/KDB enabled on the server, just like my other 'non-HP' boxes, and need to break into DDB over the SSH session ... Checking the man page for ssh, it seems to indicate that ~B should do it, but it doesn't ... so I'm obviously missing something, but what? This is what happens when I try the ~B after logging into the remcons from my desktop here: login: ~B dispatch_protocol_error: type 100 seq 73 buffer_get_ret: trying to get more bytes 4 than in buffer 0 buffer_get_int: buffer error > As expected, ~? does work, and lists ~B: login: ~? Supported escape sequences: ~. - terminate connection ~B - send a BREAK to the remote system ~C - open a command line ~R - Request rekey (SSH protocol 2 only) ~^Z - suspend ssh ~# - list forwarded connections ~& - background ssh (when waiting for connections to terminate) ~? - this message ~~ - send the escape character by typing it twice (Note that escapes are only recognized immediately after newline.) I've tried CR~B and that makes no difference either ... same 'dispatch_protocol_error' as above :( Help and thanks ... - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFe5zw4QvfyHIvDvMRAp+QAJ9qG5gE/tR0LbUelpmoWdJyXdqJewCeJ3Dx GP2uVktF1qvJo6mXbb1JlzQ= =AfVV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 06:20:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88EBC16A597 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 06:20:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2C143C9E for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 06:19:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so969220uge for ; Sat, 09 Dec 2006 22:20:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oB9RQ8Zu461N7igdktsNaq855ZdcImlwPKdH19rJDB3CGDdq9YMgB2TRQg2LRDA2sORDB2AdUFWeESj6bRRes0/PzrC8JH4N1BfqHIj8KchJfJ82D4mwTvk3hIf+ASIUWjKVlvFLk3dD1GEE/33Q8hTMSw6pVKMyxE3cHaLqfyU= Received: by 10.67.97.7 with SMTP id z7mr7881538ugl.1165731637436; Sat, 09 Dec 2006 22:20:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.27.15 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 22:20:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <499c70c0612092220p6c603fd5h4d491ed02b8af1fa@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:20:37 +0300 From: "Abdullah Al-Marrie" To: "Dan Nelson" In-Reply-To: <20061209225506.GD69299@dan.emsphone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200612091549.14418.freebsd@dfwlp.com> <20061209225506.GD69299@dan.emsphone.com> Cc: Jonathan Horne , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dns cache on a desktop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 06:20:39 -0000 On 12/10/06, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Dec 09), Jonathan Horne said: > > how can i flush the dns cache on my desktop system? google turns up > > plenty on how to do it in linux or osx... but not freebsd. can > > someone clue me in? > > Just bounce named: /etc/rc.d/named restart > > If you are not running named, you have no cache to flush :) > > -- Is there away to cache dns for faster lookup, I don't run named? I use DHCP. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 06:40:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8311D16A403 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 06:40:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fk@zepher.dyndns.org) Received: from rosy.dyndns.org (softbank220038116012.bbtec.net [220.38.116.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4BE6843CA2 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 06:39:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fk@zepher.dyndns.org) Received: (qmail 53535 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2006 06:27:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Dec 2006 06:27:57 -0000 To: perryh@pluto.rain.com In-Reply-To: <457b3f3a.e4Sf+YRQsI6sLl6z%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20061210061828K.fk@zepher.dyndns.org> <457b3f3a.e4Sf+YRQsI6sLl6z%perryh@pluto.rain.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.2 on Emacs 19.34 / Mule 2.3 (SUETSUMUHANA) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20061210152756J.fk@zepher.dyndns.org> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:27:56 +0900 From: FK X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 91 Cc: fk@zepher.dyndns.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How can I fix "Cannot find file system superblock" problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 06:40:40 -0000 Dear all members, From: perryh@pluto.rain.com Subject: Re: How can I fix "Cannot find file system superblock" problem? Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 14:56:58 -0800 Message-ID: <457b3f3a.e4Sf+YRQsI6sLl6z%perryh@pluto.rain.com> perryh> > #diff -s sb1 sb2 perryh> > Files sb1 and sb2 are identical perryh> > #diff -s sb1 sb3 perryh> > Files sb1 and sb3 are identical perryh> perryh> It might be worthwhile to check one of these identical "alternates" perryh> against the "real" superblock. (AFAIK only the first 512 bytes, or perryh> less, actually matter.) You might also post a dump of the first 512 perryh> bytes and see if anyone notices anything. Thank you for your reply. Following your suggestions, I tried these. #dd if=/dev/da0s2a skip=0 bs=512 count=16 of=sb0 16+0 records in 16+0 records out 8192 bytes transferred in 0.011918 secs (687360 bytes/sec) #diff -s sb0 sb1 Binary files sb0 and sb1 differ Dump for the master superblock (the first 512 bytes only). #od -x sb0 0000000 d440 10fa 9b10 09e1 9524 7b55 f334 153f 0000020 f190 0b4a 387c 5d46 1b94 14b0 ae10 0b19 0000040 4e3c b446 b870 138f 7190 0ab7 ff52 75e6 0000060 5dac 130e bbf0 0a8a 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000100 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000120 1d12 7b57 1a88 113f d610 0a84 a2be 064f 0000140 7eb8 1226 3290 0a44 9e3c 7b57 f870 0f9e 0000160 cb00 0932 cad0 7b57 1764 13e4 31d0 0ad4 0000200 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 4bfa 7b58 0000220 f54c 1243 41e0 0a4e f1a6 41f0 d97c 13ef 0000240 eb00 0ad7 cd24 7b58 d334 10a3 66d0 09c8 0000260 be3c 6d39 7870 15ab d1b0 0b6f 52be 7b59 0000300 3eb8 0fe3 4600 0973 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000320 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000340 007c 7b5a 3b94 1288 2820 0a65 f890 3fda 0000360 1440 15e3 b780 0b82 81a6 7b5a 197c 10e8 0000400 ed10 09da 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000420 2f66 7b5b 1658 138d ed60 0ab5 0000 0000 0000440 0000 0000 0000 0000 b090 7b5b f440 11ec 0000460 2d70 0a30 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000500 31ba 7b5c d228 104c cff0 09ad 5e4e 7b5c 0000520 f11c 1491 98e0 0b0f ff52 78a4 5dac 11c6 0000540 18f0 0a23 e3e8 7b5c 5ca0 13d1 c3d0 0acd 0000560 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 6512 7b5d 0000600 3a88 1231 d3e0 0a47 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000620 0000 0000 e63c 7b5d 1870 1091 a8d0 09c1 0000640 9abe 514e 5eb8 1471 9230 0b04 0000 0000 0000660 0000 0000 0000 0000 93fa 7b5e 154c 1336 0000700 5920 0a98 2ae4 26ef 9010 14b5 c730 0b1b 0000720 1524 7b5f f334 1195 8930 0a12 41ba 7b5f 0000740 1228 15db daa0 0b7f 9abe 7b5f 5eb8 10d5 0000760 8f10 09d4 c2e4 7b5f f010 143a d4a0 0af1 Dump for one of alternative superblock (the first 512 bytes only). #od -x sb1 0000000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0028 0000 0030 0000 0000020 0038 0000 0bb8 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000040 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0033 0000 0000060 4000 0000 0800 0000 0008 0000 0008 0000 0000100 0000 0000 0000 0000 c000 ffff f800 ffff 0000120 000e 0000 000b 0000 0008 0000 0800 0000 0000140 0003 0000 0002 0000 0800 0000 0000 0000 0000160 0000 0000 0800 0000 0040 0000 0000 0000 0000200 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000220 bf56 444b a5bf c858 0000 0000 0800 0000 0000240 4000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000260 0000 0000 0000 0000 5c00 0000 6f88 0001 0000300 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000320 0100 8000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000340 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 * 0001520 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 4000 0000 Does my superblock have anything wrong? This dump analysis is beyond my tecknical knowledge. So Thanks a lot for your help! -- FK. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 07:14:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7BC16A40F for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 07:14:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talbytech@southernphone.com.au) Received: from relay01.ispone.net.au (relay01.ispone.net.au [124.254.72.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22D143C9D for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 07:13:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from talbytech@southernphone.com.au) Received: from AlbertNotebk1 (124-254-108-246-dsl.ispone.net.au [124.254.108.246]) by relay01.ispone.net.au (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id kBA7EU7r000886 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 18:14:32 +1100 From: "Albert Boeve" To: Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 18:14:26 +1100 Message-ID: <000001c71c2a$d4ea5680$0600a8c0@AlbertNotebk1> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Seagate 4GB ATA-CF drive on IDE bus won't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 07:14:38 -0000 I want to install Freebsd 6.2 onto a seagate 4GB compact flash = microdrive. Neither FreeBSD 6.1 or 6.2-RC1 installers seem to detect the ATA-CF card = on the bus; although NetBSD was able to be installed on the drive and works = OK. I have tried installing the drive as ata0 master in two different = machines; both times NetBSD is able to boot off the drive -ie the hardware is = working fine - however the FreeBSD insaller does not detect the drive. Fitting the microdrive in a working FreeBSD machine as ata1 master does = not give any further debug info - no dmesg, sysctl seems to log the = attachment as failing, although it is detected by BIOS as ST64022CF.=20 FreeBSD 6.2-RC1 FreeBSD 6.2-RC1 #0: Thu Nov 16 05:12:08 UTC 2006 root@opus.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386 # atacontrol list ATA channel 0: Master: ad0 ATA/ATAPI revision 4 Slave: no device present ATA channel 1: Master: no device present Slave: acd0 <201H> ATA/ATAPI revision 0 NetBSD atactl gives: NetBSD 3.0.1 (GENERIC) #0: Thu Jul 13 23:43:47 UTC 2006 # atactl wd0 identify Model: ST64022CF, Rev: 3.02, Serial #: 4NW03XLS Device type: ATAPI, removable Device capabilities: DMA LBA IORDY operation Command set support: NOP command (enabled) READ BUFFER command (enabled) WRITE BUFFER command (enabled) look-ahead (enabled) write cache (enabled) Power Management feature set (enabled) SMART feature set (enabled) FLUSH CACHE command (enabled) Advanced Power Management feature set (enabled) CFA feature set (enabled) Is there a simple fix to make FreeBSD ata recognize the drive?=20 NB there is a simmilar question about using the same card in a pccard adapter, http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2006-March/061937.html= which appears to have been resolved? Thank You Regards, Albert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 08:09:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E492E16A403 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 08:09:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@havoc.unixathome.org) Received: from havoc.unixathome.org (havoc.unixathome.org [66.154.98.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1573C43CAD for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 08:08:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@havoc.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by havoc.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C545644E for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:10:04 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at unixathome.org Received: from havoc.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (havoc.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wGN1dBAMeZSk for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:10:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by havoc.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CB26756441; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:10:01 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20061210081001.CB26756441@havoc.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:10:01 -0800 (PST) Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2006-11-19 - 2006-12-09 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 08:09:56 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 08:16:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC53916A403 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 08:16:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coolzone@io.dk) Received: from user7.cybercity.dk (user7.cybercity.dk [212.242.41.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3178D43C9D for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 08:15:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from coolzone@io.dk) Received: from webmail.cybercity.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by user7.cybercity.dk (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kBA8GDQB065630 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:16:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from coolzone@io.dk) From: coolzone@io.dk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:16:13 +0100 Message-Id: <20061210081328.M56376@email.dk> X-Mailer: Cybercity Webmail 2.21 20031110 X-OriginatingIP: 85.233.230.48 (ida4327@vip.cybercity.dk) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Subject: Getting KD_GRAPHICS failed after upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 08:16:15 -0000 Hi Yesterday I upgraded my packages via "portupgrade -aRP", I had run "pkgdb -F" and found no problems. After upgrading I switched of my computer. When I started it today and tried to run X I got this error: Fatal server error: xf86OpenConsole: KDSETMODE KD_GRAPHICS failed Does anyone know what this means and what the solution might be? Best regards. Rico. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 08:47:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776A516A407 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 08:47:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from and3co@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94DC43CA0 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 08:45:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from and3co@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so1153282wxc for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:47:04 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; b=jnyqX2mh9DR4KcOGQ/HV/D3us5v27F70bkKhKyh8RNKtCHjxO7xsurmWI5fw39+PGPzkJA78WmMWEwNNv1gdmTW3fDUNo7Hke9tSgVDvzz/E1yOoN7MLqAGdxv+JwOpQj5lFR2/7WwPGIHyUicuMlP1RkfYGQQo31toEpUe1R40= Received: by 10.70.47.19 with SMTP id u19mr9761445wxu.1165740424139; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:47:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.95.17 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:47:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <155cea990612100047l40a0f181m3d81d20da89183fe@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:47:04 +0100 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andrik=F3_Tam=E1s?=" Sender: and3co@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1bc3ad979a26bf64 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: packet processing order X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 08:47:05 -0000 Hi list, I wanted to set up a IPSec VPN Tunnel on one of my FreeBSD box. I'm using pf for accomplish firewall. To implement almost the whole task of VPN wasn't a big deal, but I get some trouble adjusting pf.conf. I think I don't understand exactly how the network packet are processed, especially the order of processing of packets. Somehow the tunneled packets don't even get into the gif interface from my local lan. My guess is the following: the packet enter one of the interfaces => apply the incoming pf rules on the appropriate interface (last match win) nat-ing, redirect-ing the packets => apply rdr and nat rules (first match win) routing the packet (ip.forward=1) => if the packet destination cannot be routed drop or dest unreachable putting out the packet (based on routing decision) => apply the outgoing rules on the appropriate interface(last match win) Please correct me if I wrong, and if you could point me to a good tutorial that would be best. (other than http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/) Thanks for your help Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 09:19:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF2E16A407 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:19:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA59C43C9D for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:18:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBA9J71w099852 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:19:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id kBA9J6L1099849 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:19:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:19:05 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061210101712.L99842@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: strange server reboots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:19:13 -0000 every 2-3 weeks i got server reboot. no panic no errors just reboot. server are connected to UPS it's not power problem, and ALWAYS the same after effect is comming - squid's swap.state files are wrong (possibly emply), squid "sees" empty cache after that reboot. i have to rm swap.state* and rerun squid and wait quite a bit time until it rebuild database. any idea? FreeBSD 6.2-RC1/amd64 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 09:27:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B9F16A407 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:27:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E931C43CA1 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:26:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBA9Rage000701 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:27:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id kBA9RarC000697 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:27:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:27:36 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061210102636.Y632@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: OOPS www proxy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:27:41 -0000 is anybody using it with success. for me it works. and works really fast, much faster than squid but after maybe 8-12 hours it crashes. is it buggy or i'm doing something wrong? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 09:33:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3020A16A403 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:33:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A4E43CA2 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:32:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBA9XgIa001200 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:33:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id kBA9XfPT001195 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:33:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:33:41 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061210103239.M1117@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: can it be a reason X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:33:47 -0000 of server reboots? tunefs: ACLs: (-a) disabled tunefs: MAC multilabel: (-l) disabled tunefs: soft updates: (-n) enabled tunefs: maximum blocks per file in a cylinder group: (-e) 512 tunefs: average file size: (-f) 16384 tunefs: average number of files in a directory: (-s) 64 tunefs: minimum percentage of free space: (-m) 0% ^^^^^^ tunefs: optimization preference: (-o) space tunefs: volume label: (-L) i used -m 0 willingly, because it's squid storage and i control the space used in squid config so it's actually 8-10% free all the time. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 09:34:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023E616A492 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:34:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jjuanino@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C8643C9F for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:33:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jjuanino@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so978333uge for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:34:13 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-operating-system:user-agent; b=ETu6/J2DtBV7Qb9nKGidxoxqHct/NhbVgBVrw4UcDXvLVIO6yUUjFzrTmkvtKngPWW3ymc1lqtgpAk18wgp+MCTyYebQTHoGKcfVeF/9zsxEexU4aHUQhXeSeY/p2h9hW7rwKa1wi4UZY7Q6HT7mfQlxSA82GQidpsj5iavYj38= Received: by 10.67.101.10 with SMTP id d10mr1766780ugm.1165743253646; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:34:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from gauss.sanabria.es ( [84.77.80.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i39sm5533277ugd.2006.12.10.01.34.13; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:34:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by gauss.sanabria.es (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B6B064046; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:34:10 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:34:10 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_G=2E?= Juanino To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061210093410.GA6202@gauss.sanabria.es> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20061210081328.M56376@email.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061210081328.M56376@email.dk> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD gauss.sanabria.es 6.1-RELEASE-p10 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Subject: Re: Getting KD_GRAPHICS failed after upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:34:16 -0000 --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El domingo 10 de diciembre a las 09:16:13 CET, coolzone@io.dk escribi=F3: > Hi >=20 > Yesterday I upgraded my packages via "portupgrade -aRP", I had run "pkgdb= -F"=20 > and found no problems. >=20 > After upgrading I switched of my computer.=20 >=20 > When I started it today and tried to run X I got this error: >=20 > Fatal server error: >=20 > xf86OpenConsole: KDSETMODE KD_GRAPHICS failed It seems to be you are building x11-servers/xorg-server-snap port with=20 NO_SUID_XSERVER=3DYES. Check if /usr/X11R6/bin/Xorg is suid root. I hope this help Regards --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFe9SSFOo0zaS9RnIRAvNrAKCAOOFTo894ByCw94ztEOno5zc8LQCdFVSW PaSEKHfwHacpekCNxQF2Y2M= =xyTF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 09:47:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB21A16A47B for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:47:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from nagual.nl (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.10.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C939C43C9D for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:46:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.nl with local; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:47:40 +0100 id 00039835.457BD7BC.0000B9CC Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:47:40 +0100 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20061210094740.GA47520@lothlorien.nagual.nl> References: <1165691646.3362.4.camel@arwen> <6.0.0.22.2.20061209145320.024fed40@mail.computinginnovations.com> <1165698490.3362.15.camel@arwen> <457B556C.4000707@oss-solutions.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <457B556C.4000707@oss-solutions.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i From: dick hoogendijk Subject: Re: X server remote login X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:47:42 -0000 On 09 Dec Tony Shadwick wrote: > On the xserver, if you want it to happen automatically, you would put > startx in your .login file. So if you wanted that flag passed, you > would place startx -listen_tcp in your .login file. > > On the client side, you're running an x-client, I presume that gets > started from /etc/rc.conf. There's probably something like > xorg_enable="YES", and xorg_flags="blah", and you would put it in your > xorg_flags statement. Xserver/Xclient side is still a bit confusing to me. What happens is, when I logon to a solaris machine I get a login screen on which I also can logon to remote machines graphicaly. I can even chose from a list there, because these remote machines broadcast themselves? All solaris machines are seen; my FreeBSD machines are not. The latter I want changed, so I can chose to logon to a FreeBSD (remote) machine from my solaris desktop machine. Hope this will clear things up a bit. -- http://nagual.nl/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 6.1 ++ Solaris 10 6/06 ++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 10:40:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7478116A4C8 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:40:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC9443CB3 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:38:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from c83-253-29-241.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.29.241]:65172 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GtM6E-00074v-8k for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:40:03 +0100 Received: (qmail 14482 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2006 11:40:02 +0100 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with SMTP; 10 Dec 2006 11:40:02 +0100 Received: (qmail 6454 invoked by uid 1001); 10 Dec 2006 11:40:02 +0100 Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:40:02 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: dick hoogendijk Message-ID: <20061210104001.GA6304@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: dick hoogendijk , freebsd-questions References: <1165691646.3362.4.camel@arwen> <6.0.0.22.2.20061209145320.024fed40@mail.computinginnovations.com> <1165698490.3362.15.camel@arwen> <457B556C.4000707@oss-solutions.com> <20061210094740.GA47520@lothlorien.nagual.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061210094740.GA47520@lothlorien.nagual.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1GtM6E-00074v-8k. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1GtM6E-00074v-8k c5c31991b7e96a25883fc4a2c64ef95d Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: X server remote login X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:40:11 -0000 On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 10:47:40AM +0100, dick hoogendijk wrote: > On 09 Dec Tony Shadwick wrote: > > On the xserver, if you want it to happen automatically, you would put > > startx in your .login file. So if you wanted that flag passed, you > > would place startx -listen_tcp in your .login file. > > > > On the client side, you're running an x-client, I presume that gets > > started from /etc/rc.conf. There's probably something like > > xorg_enable="YES", and xorg_flags="blah", and you would put it in your > > xorg_flags statement. > > Xserver/Xclient side is still a bit confusing to me. It usually is a bit confusing since the Xserver/Xclient terminology is almost backwards from how server/client is usually used. An Xserver is the part that has a display and a keyboard. An Xclient is a program that connects to the Xserver to display pictures. > What happens is, when I logon to a solaris machine I get a login screen > on which I also can logon to remote machines graphicaly. I can even chose > from a list there, because these remote machines broadcast themselves? > All solaris machines are seen; my FreeBSD machines are not. The latter I > want changed, so I can chose to logon to a FreeBSD (remote) machine from > my solaris desktop machine. Hope this will clear things up a bit. It is quite clear what you want (except possibly to those people who have never seen such a setup before and don't even know it is possible). I have never set up such a system myself, but I think all the information you need can be found in the xdm(1) manpage. (The config files for xdm can be found under /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm/) -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 11:28:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4770016A40F for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:28:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from weiwu@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from bossdog.realss.com (bossdog.realss.com [211.157.108.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D56743CA8 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:27:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from weiwu@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by bossdog.realss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C29481C012C for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 19:28:36 +0800 (CST) Received: from bossdog.realss.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bossdog.realss.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17360-10 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 19:28:35 +0800 (CST) Received: from [218.193.55.195] (unknown [59.57.233.106]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bossdog.realss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D3C1C0070 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 19:28:33 +0800 (CST) From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=BC=A0=E9=9F=A1=E6=AD=A6?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 19:28:19 +0800 Message-Id: <1165750099.6316.18.camel@joe.realss.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bossdog.realss.com Subject: turn of a mintor that doesn't support DPMS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:28:15 -0000 Hello. Recently my monitor of the FreeBSD host is broken that it ignore power management. E.g. if the monitor should be powered-off on 15 minute of inactive, it does not power-off, but simply show blank screen. Also the power button on the screen have no effect (press this button, screen still on). This is also tested with Linux. The DPMS feature should have been broken. However it turns out a KVM switch can effectively turn off this monitor, if I switch to a console (KVM pair) that connect to no computer, the monitor turns off. Is there a software-solution to turn off the Monitor when its DPMS not working? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 12:57:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA6F16A416 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:57:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from felix.schalck@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B88F43C9E for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:56:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from felix.schalck@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2006 12:57:10 -0000 Received: from AStrasbourg-251-1-21-238.w82-126.abo.wanadoo.fr (EHLO [192.168.1.10]) [82.126.211.238] by mail.gmx.net (mp046) with SMTP; 10 Dec 2006 13:57:10 +0100 X-Authenticated: #23426003 Message-ID: <457C0422.7080609@gmx.net> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:57:06 +0100 From: "felix.schalck" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061126) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Freebsd dbus / hal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:57:13 -0000 Hi, Does someone know a good how-to to set up dbus and hal under freebsd ? Im trying to run gnome 2.16 , and it always claims not finding the dbus-socket to connect to... Thanks in advance, Felix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 13:13:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D717E16A407 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:13:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jjuanino@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE7EA43C9D for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:12:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jjuanino@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so1615838nfc for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:13:27 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-operating-system:user-agent; b=nIH7GQ91JHZe6DV6JkuWShIYXsSFidabuI4pAEPkUZ5/sFEa/zmlBQ+WAG62OXxcCqkR6gCp2Pl/lb8N8DAhh9AvxmsmIgRBWR0nEtTdDB5HEmnjxRQh5nfKprvM+6Af0pATKbXaChXXuLL+m/9ntZbxrm0k+exC6jTzMZtiy1I= Received: by 10.78.201.2 with SMTP id y2mr1070184huf.1165756406539; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:13:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from gauss.sanabria.es ( [84.77.80.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 11sm1625102hug.2006.12.10.05.13.26; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:13:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by gauss.sanabria.es (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1D8404055; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 14:13:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 14:13:22 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_G=2E?= Juanino To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061210131322.GA33464@gauss.sanabria.es> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <457C0422.7080609@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <457C0422.7080609@gmx.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD gauss.sanabria.es 6.1-RELEASE-p10 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Subject: Re: Freebsd dbus / hal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:13:28 -0000 --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El domingo 10 de diciembre a las 13:57:06 CET, felix.schalck escribi=F3: > Hi, >=20 > Does someone know a good how-to to set up dbus and hal under freebsd ? > Im trying to run gnome 2.16 , and it always claims not finding the=20 > dbus-socket to connect to... Add the following in the .xinitrc file: eval `dbus-launch` export DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS DBUS_SESSION_BUS_PID Regards --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFfAfyFOo0zaS9RnIRAitOAJ9dMegqniwu+PW+Q6vN/5ajfOJTxgCgsOk+ WwXO2Ub7LFz1tBoHoKFP1gI= =RL4t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 13:14:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DAF16A415 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:14:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7EC43CB0 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:12:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.localdomain (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A275193C for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 08:14:05 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:14:01 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200612082010.42744.news@budostore.de> <200612092204.53800.news@budostore.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612101314.01945.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> Subject: Re: Configuration of Grub? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:14:10 -0000 On Saturday 09 December 2006 22:19, David Stanford wrote: > title FreeBSD > root (hd1,0,a) > kernel /boot/loader > > Right now Linux can not read the FreeBSD disk. Does FreeBSD have its own > > > filesystem? > > Yes, by default FreeBSD uses UFS2. There is almost certainly a third party > app out there that will allow you to read UFS2 from Linux if this is what > you want to do at some point. You can also check 'man mount' under SUSE to > see if there is built-in support for mounting UFS2 filesystems (though this > is probably a long shot). > > Ans if it has its own filesystem how can grub read the /boot/loader in > > > there? > > SUSE may not be able to read it, but remember that Grub is independent (so > to speak) from Linux and has support for booting *BSD OS's. I'm curious as to why people care about UFS support, since chainloading works just fine without filesystem support. Is there a good reason for prefering "kernel /boot/loader" over chainloading on FreeBSD? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 13:16:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF6F16A47E for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:16:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF0143CA4 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:15:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so1186999wxc for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:16:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.72.10 with SMTP id u10mr5908805aga.1165756605072; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:16:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 8sm4669497agd.2006.12.10.05.16.44; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:16:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8D28B8FB; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 08:16:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (boss.seibercom.net [192.168.0.4]) (Authenticated sender: gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92771B84A; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 08:16:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 08:16:46 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: User Questions Organization: Seibercom.NET In-Reply-To: <499c70c0612092220p6c603fd5h4d491ed02b8af1fa@mail.gmail.com> References: <20061209225506.GD69299@dan.emsphone.com> <499c70c0612092220p6c603fd5h4d491ed02b8af1fa@mail.gmail.com> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20061210081620.0A44.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.29 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: dns cache on a desktop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: User Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:16:52 -0000 On Sunday December 10, 2006 at 01:20:37 (AM) Abdullah Al-Marrie wrote: > On 12/10/06, Dan Nelson wrote: > > In the last episode (Dec 09), Jonathan Horne said: > > > how can i flush the dns cache on my desktop system? google turns up > > > plenty on how to do it in linux or osx... but not freebsd. can > > > someone clue me in? > > > > Just bounce named: /etc/rc.d/named restart > > > > If you are not running named, you have no cache to flush :) > > > > -- > > Is there away to cache dns for faster lookup, I don't run named? I use DHCP. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-dns.html -- Gerard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 13:24:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B152416A4D2 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:24:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jjuanino@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC1743D88 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:22:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jjuanino@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so1617912nfc for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:23:33 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-operating-system:user-agent; b=iqga+TjheMTuc1zKYeejgdjerlhQVGYRYtwLpPF9OtKKIxYkwivXREoTiSpGFjVMr/oeJ7+sHDhjp/Cp8RrJl+R+jhoNWb/VLPsPt1uDyz8o4GZ6baSrL7BcFkp3l7whz0M+iYidsy99HdtEMpWaDYZTe0xNLQppdKdiYGcCRWI= Received: by 10.78.97.7 with SMTP id u7mr804010hub.1165757013239; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:23:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from gauss.sanabria.es ( [84.77.80.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 18sm1633293hue.2006.12.10.05.23.32; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:23:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by gauss.sanabria.es (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A54104055; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 14:23:30 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 14:23:30 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_G=2E?= Juanino To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061210132330.GB33464@gauss.sanabria.es> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <457C0422.7080609@gmx.net> <20061210131322.GA33464@gauss.sanabria.es> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061210131322.GA33464@gauss.sanabria.es> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD gauss.sanabria.es 6.1-RELEASE-p10 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Subject: Re: Freebsd dbus / hal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:24:17 -0000 --cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El domingo 10 de diciembre a las 14:13:22 CET, Jos=E9 G. Juanino escribi=F3: > El domingo 10 de diciembre a las 13:57:06 CET, felix.schalck escribi=F3: > > Hi, > >=20 > > Does someone know a good how-to to set up dbus and hal under freebsd ? > > Im trying to run gnome 2.16 , and it always claims not finding the=20 > > dbus-socket to connect to... >=20 > Add the following in the .xinitrc file: >=20 > eval `dbus-launch` > export DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS DBUS_SESSION_BUS_PID I forget that is also necessary start dbus-daemon. The best way is in rc.conf: dbus_enable=3D"YES" --cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFfApSFOo0zaS9RnIRApAJAJwJ1mU6IwG6PAba5DchrRkZntgSPwCfYhGb oN06BbXjXt39mVVyw4/gH+A= =0dbO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 13:39:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7DC16A403 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:39:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pigskin_referee@yahoo.com) Received: from web34404.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web34404.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.178.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 614BC43C9E for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:38:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pigskin_referee@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 6214 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Dec 2006 13:39:27 -0000 Message-ID: <20061210133927.6212.qmail@web34404.mail.mud.yahoo.com> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=ZXzmBq2JOI0jZ2at8csv1oMIA4p9vszN5Ik+9UzOOuFNRKZeyXRCSkeqJGGe72j3Mdv79rZ2W9pGWzvTedVQEL46P0yWxvEMgtTe+q8tAvULTmgEYJgKeaXzfsA38Oim5iyaaNS6fqfUEgOkItDklf3aoa1SCXE8syKYxFn0V4M=; X-YMail-OSG: yunHdtUVM1nGHZyutv59przAKIeFiMkrqO5p2GZ2AIZY4DuD0N7Kxp7KBjiyjz.OCg-- Received: from [67.189.184.224] by web34404.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:39:27 PST Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:39:27 -0800 (PST) From: White Hat To: FreeBSD Users Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Atomic Update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:39:28 -0000 I am not sure what the correct procedure is to do an atomic update. Scenario: 1) Download database-1. This database is going to replace an identically named database. Since I cannot shut down the program that is using this database, what would be the best way to insert the new database. I was thinking that I could use the 'mv' command as opposed to 'cp', but I am not sure. -- White Hat pigskin_referee@yahoo.com ____________________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over 1 million songs. http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 13:48:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D4516A403 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:48:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@budostore.de) Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de (mo-p00-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE13143C9E for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:47:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from news@budostore.de) Received: from nor75-5-82-235-173-77.fbx.proxad.net (nor75-5-82-235-173-77.fbx.proxad.net [82.235.173.77]) by post.webmailer.de (mrclete mo59) (RZmta 3.8) with ESMTP id iBABM5Cv00ca0K for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 14:48:22 +0100 (MET) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 14:48:22 +0100 (MET) From: Karl Sinn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200612082010.42744.news@budostore.de> <200612101314.01945.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <200612101314.01945.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612101440.42667.news@budostore.de> X-RZG-AUTH: ibDpgOm8RLcSc5zBxTj4 Subject: Re: Configuration of Grub? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:48:25 -0000 Hi, Am Sonntag, 10. Dezember 2006 14:14 schrieb RW: > > SUSE may not be able to read it, but remember that Grub is independent > > (so to speak) from Linux and has support for booting *BSD OS's. > > I'm curious as to why people care about UFS support, since chainloading > works just fine without filesystem support. > > Is there a good reason for prefering "kernel /boot/loader" over > chainloading on FreeBSD? I'm curious :-) Can you send me the settings that you use to start FreeBSD with grub and chainloading? Thanks Karl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 13:50:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70BFB16A417 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:50:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pigskin_referee@yahoo.com) Received: from web34412.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web34412.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.178.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 08AD843CA5 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:49:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pigskin_referee@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 45713 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Dec 2006 13:50:53 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=tGcp6EpjZXAA7L0lQ0Xh9rkTLAJKXiH0D0bbarFpoP1r1XYROvrWLR2wXehKHoANRqTTlHaBI3JVcreh5Pt3QHu7jK5FuFR+T7Fjsbh2GjKFIQEkAWRvtlbyzUmor4wKL/5htkfv2yJX/CXuGgd80BaAkaJ9346Tuavq/3daa/g=; X-YMail-OSG: .jh4vAkVM1mf_lUVixwomMOkQ7eM0wpcdZd6qmhV5qh8EQ3dDBor_W99L8O4GVbmKw-- Received: from [67.189.184.224] by web34412.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:50:53 PST Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:50:53 -0800 (PST) From: White Hat To: FreeBSD Users Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <662775.45135.qm@web34412.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Subject: Forcing use of Bison-2.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:50:55 -0000 FreeBSD-6.1 I am experiencing an ongoing problem with 'Bison'. I have several programs on my PC that require the newer version - Bison-2.3; however, there are also some programs present that require the older version. Both versions cannot coexist on the same machine apparently. When doing an update, using either portmanager or portupgrade, it seems that first one version has to be deinstalled and the other version installed to allow programs that depend on them to be updated. Then as the update progresses, the reverse happens. Is there anyway I can force any program that depends on 'Bison' to use the newer version? I have tried checking out the Makefile for some of the affected programs, but it is just not something I understand well enough to accomplish. -- White Hat pigskin_referee@yahoo.com ____________________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over 1 million songs. http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 15:05:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A706016A407 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:05:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E26A43C9E for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:04:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 421932059D2 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:05:38 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7X+8MSv+nAOb for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:05:32 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f01:224:1::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A83205873 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:05:32 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:05:25 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 X-Face: &'; cS03F?rr_w2Qce.d2f7xmwXfcJWDs>}CkpDw.c]ZJJ_)i0Nx Subject: Advantages of trimmed kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:05:39 -0000 --nextPart2705311.rVld7I0z8H Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Are there any real advantages to building a kernel stripped of unused drive= rs,=20 especially when running it on a fairly large machine? For years, I've been= =20 dutifully removing device drivers (or more recently, including GENERIC and= =20 using 'nodevice') for everything I don't have. But does this actually do=20 anything useful, or am I just tilting at windmills? I know the definitive answer would be to run benchmarks both ways, but I do= n't=20 really have the option of pulling down a production machine just for this. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart2705311.rVld7I0z8H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFfCI65sRg+Y0CpvERAi1kAJ40MfLx8/Tem73FhVeJL0dw6z3owgCbB9Rs 5CRWMx7NB+ZuehQz9XP3MyM= =sIF6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2705311.rVld7I0z8H-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 15:18:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C8016A47C for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:18:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED3443CB5 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:16:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GtQQf-0005If-TC for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:17:26 -0500 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost.localnet.local [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kBAFK04q032221 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:20:00 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id kBAFJx4T032217 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:19:59 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:19:59 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200612100905.30430.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <200612100905.30430.kirk@strauser.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612100919.59564.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec7956caaa8452361adc80ded3a206c5cad3350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Re: Advantages of trimmed kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:18:04 -0000 On Sunday 10 December 2006 09:05, Kirk Strauser wrote: > Are there any real advantages to building a kernel stripped of unused > drivers, especially when running it on a fairly large machine? For years, > I've been dutifully removing device drivers (or more recently, including > GENERIC and using 'nodevice') for everything I don't have. But does this > actually do anything useful, or am I just tilting at windmills? > > I know the definitive answer would be to run benchmarks both ways, but I > don't really have the option of pulling down a production machine just for > this. Kirk, I don't expect there is only one answer to your question. The issue is broader, I think, than just the relative speed and performance improvements achieved by running a lean kernel. You say that you can't afford to take a production machine down, but consider this: What if you trimmed all of the "fat" from the kernel on a server, and then the server's nic goes bad. Suppose that as a stop-gap measure you pull an old isa nic from out of the closet, install it, and then boot the server ... only to realize that your nic is not supported by the kernel that you dutifully trimmed. I think it is especially important to keep the kernel as flexible as possible, since you may have to install the OS on any given machine without the luxury of recompiling. Just my .02 lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 15:42:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07AB216A412 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:42:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA4243C9F for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:40:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB75D2059D2 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:41:58 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f57tMqNCvTkc for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:41:55 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f01:224:1::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6348D205873 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:41:55 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:41:52 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200612100905.30430.kirk@strauser.com> <200612100919.59564.lane@joeandlane.com> In-Reply-To: <200612100919.59564.lane@joeandlane.com> X-Face: &'; cS03F?rr_w2Qce.d2f7xmwXfcJWDs>}CkpDw.c]ZJJ_)i0Nx Subject: Re: Advantages of trimmed kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:42:00 -0000 --nextPart1275689.KVHPcnRoGT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 10 December 2006 09:19, Lane wrote: > You say that you can't afford to take a production machine down, but > consider this: What if you trimmed all of the "fat" from the kernel on a > server, and then the server's nic goes bad. Well, that's an example of the kind of thing that makes me not want to hack= =20 GENERIC too much. Also, accidentally removing some critical driver is=20 another drawback. So, with all the disadvantages, are there any real=20 advantages to doing this? Saving half a meg of memory on a four gig machin= e=20 isn't worth the aggravation. Squeezing an extra 10% performance out of the= =20 same hardware would be, though. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart1275689.KVHPcnRoGT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFfCrB5sRg+Y0CpvERAnUDAKCEnMA3/L0BW2w+rozkfeV58x/7eACeNeSe Ynl194RGiWaWxpWQ0tD6s0U= =s3SZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1275689.KVHPcnRoGT-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 15:50:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8877016A47B for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:50:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305E943CA3 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:49:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from c83-253-29-241.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.29.241]:50027 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GtQwZ-0003rt-7s for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:50:23 +0100 Received: (qmail 16273 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2006 16:50:22 +0100 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with SMTP; 10 Dec 2006 16:50:22 +0100 Received: (qmail 28762 invoked by uid 1001); 10 Dec 2006 16:50:22 +0100 Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:50:22 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: Kirk Strauser Message-ID: <20061210155022.GA28750@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Kirk Strauser , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200612100905.30430.kirk@strauser.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200612100905.30430.kirk@strauser.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1GtQwZ-0003rt-7s. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1GtQwZ-0003rt-7s a4573f54f34634c0390c86922cae180d Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Advantages of trimmed kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:50:25 -0000 On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 09:05:25AM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote: > Are there any real advantages to building a kernel stripped of unused drivers, > especially when running it on a fairly large machine? For years, I've been > dutifully removing device drivers (or more recently, including GENERIC and > using 'nodevice') for everything I don't have. But does this actually do > anything useful, or am I just tilting at windmills? It will save a little bit of memory and diskspace and the machine will probably boot slightly faster since it will not need to probe for non-existing devices, but other than that I doubt it will make any difference at all. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 15:53:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C7016A403 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:53:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB77C43CB5 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:52:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from c83-253-29-241.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.29.241]:58729 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GtQzZ-00027C-3Z for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:53:29 +0100 Received: (qmail 16280 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2006 16:53:28 +0100 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with SMTP; 10 Dec 2006 16:53:28 +0100 Received: (qmail 28773 invoked by uid 1001); 10 Dec 2006 16:53:28 +0100 Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:53:28 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: Lane Message-ID: <20061210155328.GB28750@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Lane , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200612100905.30430.kirk@strauser.com> <200612100919.59564.lane@joeandlane.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200612100919.59564.lane@joeandlane.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1GtQzZ-00027C-3Z. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1GtQzZ-00027C-3Z 5eee2330d0568432bb79968c3ea3cdc4 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Advantages of trimmed kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:53:37 -0000 On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 09:19:59AM -0600, Lane wrote: > On Sunday 10 December 2006 09:05, Kirk Strauser wrote: > > Are there any real advantages to building a kernel stripped of unused > > drivers, especially when running it on a fairly large machine? For years, > > I've been dutifully removing device drivers (or more recently, including > > GENERIC and using 'nodevice') for everything I don't have. But does this > > actually do anything useful, or am I just tilting at windmills? > > > > I know the definitive answer would be to run benchmarks both ways, but I > > don't really have the option of pulling down a production machine just for > > this. > Kirk, > > I don't expect there is only one answer to your question. The issue is > broader, I think, than just the relative speed and performance improvements > achieved by running a lean kernel. > > You say that you can't afford to take a production machine down, but consider > this: What if you trimmed all of the "fat" from the kernel on a server, and > then the server's nic goes bad. Suppose that as a stop-gap measure you pull > an old isa nic from out of the closet, install it, and then boot the > server ... only to realize that your nic is not supported by the kernel that > you dutifully trimmed. In which case it is a good thing that most drivers are available as modules so that you can load them even if the driver is not included in the kernel. > > I think it is especially important to keep the kernel as flexible as possible, > since you may have to install the OS on any given machine without the luxury > of recompiling. > -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 15:56:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FFA16A403 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:56:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from regulus.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-244.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.244]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31BF143CB2 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:55:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from athena.dfwlp.com (athena.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.83]) (authenticated bits=0) by regulus.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBAFuCU4004128 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:56:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:56:12 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200612100905.30430.kirk@strauser.com> <200612100919.59564.lane@joeandlane.com> In-Reply-To: <200612100919.59564.lane@joeandlane.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612100956.12327.freebsd@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on regulus.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: Advantages of trimmed kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:56:15 -0000 On Sunday 10 December 2006 09:19, Lane wrote: > Suppose that as a stop-gap measure you pull > an old isa nic from out of the closet, install it, and then boot the > server ... only to realize that your nic is not supported by the kernel > that you dutifully trimmed. > > I think it is especially important to keep the kernel as flexible as > possible, since you may have to install the OS on any given machine without > the luxury of recompiling. lane, i think thats a really good way to look at it. flexibility can truly be a key of utmost importance when it comes to disaster recovery. cheers, jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 16:14:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E4616A403 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:14:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan-tiefert@t-online.de) Received: from mailout11.sul.t-online.com (mailout11.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A9F043C9E for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:13:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stevan-tiefert@t-online.de) Received: from fwd30.aul.t-online.de by mailout11.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1GtRJd-0004yk-07; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:14:13 +0100 Received: from localhost (rIXDHBZCgedwy1Le5uTELtVSR51flIdS1QtAqTamAqj5EIa6hxA084@[172.20.101.250]) by fwd30.aul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1GtRJY-0hjbH60; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:14:08 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:14:08 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-UMS: email X-Mailer: TOI Kommunikationscenter V7-5-3 From: "stevan-tiefert@t-online.de" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1GtRJY-0hjbH60@fwd30.aul.t-online.de> X-ID: rIXDHBZCgedwy1Le5uTELtVSR51flIdS1QtAqTamAqj5EIa6hxA084@t-dialin.net X-TOI-MSGID: 013350dc-7006-4905-9e8b-3d0bc402b428 Subject: Download FreeBSD 6.1 via bittorrent X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:14:15 -0000 Hello, does somebody knows when the download via torrent is available again? With regards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 16:24:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60CD16A403 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:24:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from holtor@yahoo.com) Received: from web31707.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web31707.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.201.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5DA5143C9E for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:23:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from holtor@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 80430 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Dec 2006 16:24:26 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=JkwGRR7sjMG/rRYFZ8eI9ZozQioWaXlqAy1TF9+3A8Do+N6A9X0z5V9+3+renmbjB6JKSKjs28aDY88NOZC070ZtIbJl3lOVLo1Ki2vfGqOoIx4wpBAPGsgLSiYnv8PD+RtzxPFQmX3VoZ9sQdTM6OOKhG0mN5SL3cIA9rv28k4=; X-YMail-OSG: 72SQ_bMVM1mpGWyEPo18JaMfMVG9B2oQfKn4IrW6SncfWFmllx.zjf0CcfKb.D_OVITw.8NOrsqHkFaeett_F2yGpIUMS0nFhJBTHkuCc4IUQXg_uKwIBi2f8DkXLrNKV0UpWLocoBfx02w- Received: from [68.197.167.249] by web31707.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 08:24:25 PST Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 08:24:25 -0800 (PST) From: Holtor To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <6171.80404.qm@web31707.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: kern.ipc.nsfbufs Max Value? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:24:26 -0000 I have an extremely busy web server here serving mostly static html pages and images using apache 2.2.3 with sendfile enabled. It's a Dual Xeon server with 4 GB RAM and I've tweaked many sysctl variables to help the system chug along. At peak, apache is running nearly 1,500 child processes. To my question, what is the max value of kern.ipc.nsfbufs and does it depend on any other values? I had originally increased it to 32768 however sfbufs got maxed out slowing the server. Then I increased it to 65536 and currently have these results: 45348/48844/65536 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max) To me that's too close for comfort so I further tried to increase it to 131072 however with that setting the system would not boot. The kernel page faulted with an error in the swapper process until I decreased kern.ipc.nsfbufs back to 65536. Is there anyway to increase this value even higher? The server has nearly 2.5 GB of free ram out of the 4 GB installed and the load averages are very low 0.07, 0.15, 0.34 so hopefully it's possible to tweak this some more. Any ideas? Thank You, Holt G. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 16:59:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1953F16A412 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:59:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8743B43C9D for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:58:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from working (c-71-60-174-60.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.60.174.60]) (AUTH: LOGIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:59:32 -0500 id 00056403.457C3CF4.0000E62E Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:59:31 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: Kirk Strauser Message-Id: <20061210115931.3c176bd7.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <200612100941.53860.kirk@strauser.com> References: <200612100905.30430.kirk@strauser.com> <200612100919.59564.lane@joeandlane.com> <200612100941.53860.kirk@strauser.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.10 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Advantages of trimmed kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:59:34 -0000 Kirk Strauser wrote: > > On Sunday 10 December 2006 09:19, Lane wrote: > > > You say that you can't afford to take a production machine down, but > > consider this: What if you trimmed all of the "fat" from the kernel on a > > server, and then the server's nic goes bad. > > Well, that's an example of the kind of thing that makes me not want to hack > GENERIC too much. Also, accidentally removing some critical driver is > another drawback. So, with all the disadvantages, are there any real > advantages to doing this? Saving half a meg of memory on a four gig machine > isn't worth the aggravation. Squeezing an extra 10% performance out of the > same hardware would be, though. It's interesting that I've never seen any performance tests regarding this sort of thing. Theoretically, the kernel should be faster with less stuff in it, but whether that theory bears out in practice, and whether it's enough to make it worthwhile -- I don't know. The tough thing would be effectively testing it. It's quite possible that only certain functions of the kernel would speed up, in which case, it could be difficult to determine whether there's any gain or not. Additionally, different drivers might provide different advantages/ disadvantages from being loaded/unloaded. I.e., compiling without a particular SCSI adapter might provide a benefit, while compiling without a particular NIC driver might do nothing. One has to wonder whether it's even worth going to all the work to quantify it? I mean, take the following in to account: 1) Recompiling a kernel in FreeBSD is damn easy. 2) Loading a driver from a kld if you forget it is easy. 3) Most (all?) settings that are set at kernel compile time can be adjusted via sysctl without recompiling. 4) There's obviously no _huge_ benefit to building a custom kernel, or someone would have made mention of it. -Bill From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 17:18:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32EA116A407 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:18:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.200.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961B743CA5 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:17:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [192.168.214.215] (cpe-76-184-133-124.tx.res.rr.com[76.184.133.124]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2006121017181501100pmidqe>; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:18:16 +0000 Message-ID: <457C4156.8010309@computer.org> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:18:14 -0600 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061111) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kirk Strauser , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200612100905.30430.kirk@strauser.com> <20061210155022.GA28750@owl.midgard.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20061210155022.GA28750@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Advantages of trimmed kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:18:17 -0000 On 12/10/06 09:50, Erik Trulsson wrote: > On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 09:05:25AM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote: >> Are there any real advantages to building a kernel stripped of unused drivers, >> especially when running it on a fairly large machine? For years, I've been >> dutifully removing device drivers (or more recently, including GENERIC and >> using 'nodevice') for everything I don't have. But does this actually do >> anything useful, or am I just tilting at windmills? > > It will save a little bit of memory and diskspace and the machine will > probably boot slightly faster since it will not need to probe for > non-existing devices, but other than that I doubt it will make any > difference at all. > I'll second this one. FWIW... Its my understanding that - the memory saved would be negligible. - the performance differences while running are negligible - the boot time is shortened as the kernel will not probe removed devices. - [many|all] removed devices are available and loadable as kld. - as always, remove too much and you can cripple yourself. The above is my understandings from the many times this pops up on the list. You might do some searching on the archives as I think this comes up quite often. I do still however remove things from time to time as it makes me feel a little bit more geeky. :p But I don't think its necessary for performance. HTH. -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 17:23:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68BE16A47B for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:23:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Received: from daisy2.compar.com (daisy2.compar.com [216.208.38.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1605C43CA2 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:22:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost.compar.com [127.0.0.1]) by daisy2.compar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA9713C424; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:42:53 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at compar.com Received: from unknown by localhost (amavisd-new, unix socket) id PQTA570p1BW5; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:42:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from gabby.gsicomp.on.ca (CPE00062566c7bb-CM0011e6ede298.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [74.109.12.188]) by daisy2.compar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1AE813C421; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:42:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabby.gsicomp.on.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BD1610E; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:35:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown by localhost (amavisd-new, unix socket) id client-SsAR2RsS; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:35:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from hermes (hermes.gsicomp.on.ca [192.168.0.18]) by gabby.gsicomp.on.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FAC56105; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:35:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <006301c71c7b$7fee7e80$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> From: "Matt Emmerton" To: "Jonathan Horne" , References: <200612100905.30430.kirk@strauser.com><200612100919.59564.lane@joeandlane.com> <200612100956.12327.freebsd@dfwlp.com> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:51:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gsicomp.on.ca Cc: Subject: Re: Advantages of trimmed kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:23:40 -0000 > On Sunday 10 December 2006 09:19, Lane wrote: > > Suppose that as a stop-gap measure you pull > > an old isa nic from out of the closet, install it, and then boot the > > server ... only to realize that your nic is not supported by the kernel > > that you dutifully trimmed. > > > > I think it is especially important to keep the kernel as flexible as > > possible, since you may have to install the OS on any given machine without > > the luxury of recompiling. > > lane, i think thats a really good way to look at it. flexibility can truly be > a key of utmost importance when it comes to disaster recovery. However, remember that kmods can help you out in situations like these even if you haven't compiled the driver into the kernel -- as long as you're building with modules, that is. -- Matt Emmerton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 17:27:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2AF16A415 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:27:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from omr5.networksolutionsemail.com (omr5.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E804543C9F for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:26:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from mail.networksolutionsemail.com (ns-omr5.mgt.netsol.com [10.49.6.68]) by omr5.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id kBAHRlWI008066 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:27:47 -0500 Received: (qmail 14607 invoked by uid 78); 10 Dec 2006 17:27:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.15.200?) (racerx@makeworld.com@71.113.179.243) by ns-omr5.lb.hosting.dc2.netsol.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2006 17:27:46 -0000 Message-ID: <457C4390.6070809@makeworld.com> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:27:44 -0600 From: Chris User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061204) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Schuele References: <200612100905.30430.kirk@strauser.com> <20061210155022.GA28750@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <457C4156.8010309@computer.org> In-Reply-To: <457C4156.8010309@computer.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=C01BC363 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms080700080201000302080803" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Advantages of trimmed kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: racerx@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:27:49 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms080700080201000302080803 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Eric Schuele wrote: > On 12/10/06 09:50, Erik Trulsson wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 09:05:25AM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote: >>> Are there any real advantages to building a kernel stripped of unused= >>> drivers, especially when running it on a fairly large machine? For >>> years, I've been dutifully removing device drivers (or more recently,= >>> including GENERIC and using 'nodevice') for everything I don't have. = >>> But does this actually do anything useful, or am I just tilting at >>> windmills? >> >> It will save a little bit of memory and diskspace and the machine will= >> probably boot slightly faster since it will not need to probe for >> non-existing devices, but other than that I doubt it will make any >> difference at all. >> >=20 > I'll second this one. >=20 > FWIW... Its my understanding that > - the memory saved would be negligible. > - the performance differences while running are negligible > - the boot time is shortened as the kernel will not probe removed devi= ces. > - [many|all] removed devices are available and loadable as kld. > - as always, remove too much and you can cripple yourself. >=20 > The above is my understandings from the many times this pops up on the > list. You might do some searching on the archives as I think this come= s > up quite often. >=20 > I do still however remove things from time to time as it makes me feel = a > little bit more geeky. :p But I don't think its necessary for > performance. >=20 > HTH. >=20 =2E.. and to summarize, I have seen users boast about how small they were= able to get the kernel after the compile only to shoot them self in the foot when it won't boot. I think in general - it's more a pissing contest for those that like pissing contests. I think that in the end, the wise choice is to just leave the kernel along for reasons previously posted. Just my .02 --=20 Best regards, Chris If you fool around with a thing for very long you will screw it up. --------------ms080700080201000302080803 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIJDzCC AuIwggJLoAMCAQICED5yXrU0zFHzWG+pfEwVyF0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA2MTIxMDA1NDkxMloX DTA3MTIxMDA1NDkxMlowRjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEjMCEG CSqGSIb3DQEJARYUcmFjZXJ4QG1ha2V3b3JsZC5jb20wggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IB DwAwggEKAoIBAQC36D3ytaLTlJBYCYC8no4GDfA/PFhueOBg4IJXetluxi0o6MmfsOqw5esN 9AJ4HBEc7KQFomWmIFVVDkGrF1vKSUWFDkjqhn4sISMLT//pqsj9mT6Wolpk5rwpu1fJmNWI gSF5Cx/VRnHZnRmaPdO6h6/hv9pMVKPjgZCGe9JU9fomxWUpDpki7XN+Usf4Cq+anM1qA+tn NTKX0dn7+awDk7str1e8E7Xkk9Y6eMn+Agm9nXCuSH8qq903fCM/gTzJTLeIq9Gt8J4Bksqq 6Pucpz1Ok8QH5+6gjxAMoxPCQ1hcuoTjfkuAAMDjssUMvbpfyJIZ7Gr1YAhuy0UbKEGjAgMB AAGjMTAvMB8GA1UdEQQYMBaBFHJhY2VyeEBtYWtld29ybGQuY29tMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAbixCkJ3X0YqT9rDGyyKfa3tv21yik0+t6yZ6HzdZAPBgoK7b fbtd/XwKh6AdXBWYASSYLLVApNaGnFJw3WQRKeDnGhBqoBWaKekwus6hc1G1oLemRvPMgy7j o/7ltrpboYROizesu9ndhtYcJR3Yd82Ymq0RFxcMvK0AnlQ9C6AwggLiMIICS6ADAgECAhA+ cl61NMxR81hvqXxMFchdMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQK ExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29u YWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQTAeFw0wNjEyMTAwNTQ5MTJaFw0wNzEyMTAwNTQ5MTJa MEYxHzAdBgNVBAMTFlRoYXd0ZSBGcmVlbWFpbCBNZW1iZXIxIzAhBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWFHJh Y2VyeEBtYWtld29ybGQuY29tMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAt+g9 8rWi05SQWAmAvJ6OBg3wPzxYbnjgYOCCV3rZbsYtKOjJn7DqsOXrDfQCeBwRHOykBaJlpiBV VQ5BqxdbyklFhQ5I6oZ+LCEjC0//6arI/Zk+lqJaZOa8KbtXyZjViIEheQsf1UZx2Z0Zmj3T uoev4b/aTFSj44GQhnvSVPX6JsVlKQ6ZIu1zflLH+AqvmpzNagPrZzUyl9HZ+/msA5O7La9X vBO15JPWOnjJ/gIJvZ1wrkh/KqvdN3wjP4E8yUy3iKvRrfCeAZLKquj7nKc9TpPEB+fuoI8Q DKMTwkNYXLqE435LgADA47LFDL26X8iSGexq9WAIbstFGyhBowIDAQABozEwLzAfBgNVHREE GDAWgRRyYWNlcnhAbWFrZXdvcmxkLmNvbTAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUA A4GBAG4sQpCd19GKk/awxssin2t7b9tcopNPresmeh83WQDwYKCu2327Xf18CoegHVwVmAEk mCy1QKTWhpxScN1kESng5xoQaqAVminpMLrOoXNRtaC3pkbzzIMu46P+5ba6W6GETos3rLvZ 3YbWHCUd2HfNmJqtERcXDLytAJ5UPQugMIIDPzCCAqigAwIBAgIBDTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUF ADCB0TELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExFTATBgNVBAgTDFdlc3Rlcm4gQ2FwZTESMBAGA1UEBxMJQ2Fw ZSBUb3duMRowGAYDVQQKExFUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZzEoMCYGA1UECxMfQ2VydGlmaWNh dGlvbiBTZXJ2aWNlcyBEaXZpc2lvbjEkMCIGA1UEAxMbVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIENBMSswKQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhxwZXJzb25hbC1mcmVlbWFpbEB0aGF3dGUuY29tMB4X DTAzMDcxNzAwMDAwMFoXDTEzMDcxNjIzNTk1OVowYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoT HFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25h bCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDEpjxV c1X7TrnKmVoeaMB1BHCd3+n/ox7svc31W/Iadr1/DDph8r9RzgHU5VAKMNcCY1osiRVwjt3J 8CuFWqo/cVbLrzwLB+fxH5E2JCoTzyvV84J3PQO+K/67GD4Hv0CAAmTXp6a7n2XRxSpUhQ9I BH+nttE8YQRAHmQZcmC3+wIDAQABo4GUMIGRMBIGA1UdEwEB/wQIMAYBAf8CAQAwQwYDVR0f BDwwOjA4oDagNIYyaHR0cDovL2NybC50aGF3dGUuY29tL1RoYXd0ZVBlcnNvbmFsRnJlZW1h aWxDQS5jcmwwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgEGMCkGA1UdEQQiMCCkHjAcMRowGAYDVQQDExFQcml2YXRl TGFiZWwyLTEzODANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOBgQBIjNFQg+oLLswNo2asZw9/r6y+whehQ5aU nX9MIbj4Nh+qLZ82L8D0HFAgk3A8/a3hYWLD2ToZfoSxmRsAxRoLgnSeJVCUYsfbJ3FXJY3d qZw5jowgT2Vfldr394fWxghOrvbqNOUQGls1TXfjViF4gtwhGTXeJLHTHUb/XV9lTzGCA2Qw ggNgAgEBMHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQ dHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENB AhA+cl61NMxR81hvqXxMFchdMAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggHDMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG 9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTA2MTIxMDE3Mjc0NFowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFIv7 TbMakUb+FogboWpje+TQCsPkMFIGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFFMEMwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZI hvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMIGFBgkr BgEEAYI3EAQxeDB2MGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGlu ZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWlu ZyBDQQIQPnJetTTMUfNYb6l8TBXIXTCBhwYLKoZIhvcNAQkQAgsxeKB2MGIxCzAJBgNVBAYT AlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNU aGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQQIQPnJetTTMUfNYb6l8TBXIXTAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASCAQBh7/+wwzL4curo/3SfEc+xqYCafOFFwj79Vf0ld25KCuFNXlKU pmCdchRWqwloDArre7DrR87e5OjgK6nUsz8N739t5LtCfh5EUQ633hEHA5Rsx6anuJq7MAYh kP4DTDYDDVw5aiMwmci3VzKI1CaJ1m7nykbsLE+ljnA44KkH/mrYdjQ4JQJUVqj9EnJkjFZe 1GcW9olusevwCPICfUWRp5zim1EPIbLJ3vpUQe5zR1HJhls0W5I/WuJu23hCX9WBtseD56t1 7wWeBB1RtzJrwQ4niY8Sz+6IEIVa1ETcyPncKnEY8co3J59hEqrIP3bN263VqnEuEQqQCbhQ t9ICAAAAAAAA --------------ms080700080201000302080803-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 18:32:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3201D16A407 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 18:32:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2189D43C9E for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 18:31:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 Dec 2006 13:32:33 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id MQI78293; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:32:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-203-219.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.203.219]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 Dec 2006 13:32:29 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,518,1157342400"; d="scan'208"; a="330190138:sNHT22653374" From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17788.21019.357739.300962@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:29:47 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <457C4156.8010309@computer.org> References: <200612100905.30430.kirk@strauser.com> <20061210155022.GA28750@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <457C4156.8010309@computer.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail: UCE(50) X-Junkmail-Status: score=50/50, host=mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=bulk(0), refid=str=0001.0A090203.457C5198.0084,ss=3,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.121/2006-09-27 Subject: Re: Advantages of trimmed kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 18:32:35 -0000 Eric Schuele writes: > FWIW... Its my understanding that > - the memory saved would be negligible. How are we defining "negligible"? I know I've seen a pruned kernel 25% smaller than GENERIC for the same release; I /think/ I've seen one 33% smaller. Is that difference important? DammifIkno. IF you're feeling paranoid, compile and install both. (Assuming I'm correct in believing they install clean to separate directories.) Robert Huff (running a custom kernel since 2.mumble) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 19:09:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0ED16A412 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 19:09:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tfcheng@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EDCC43C9F for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 19:07:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tfcheng@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1034784uge for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:09:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=JAvbwN5Q+k/KsdS2X0g2JRHDTrPcshformW9qTMsNwgnPpi0aGUXpIQC3gNzznVtz9fINp0z2D6h4IhpQuU3GwG8R/EiYN9DukoKXRSvcDAGjNrQu5TVF2A1wHgrksNpju6Vh1mdu4vqDhuwm5+GDXJr9cy9pA7jRI9JpP2Yaqk= Received: by 10.78.117.10 with SMTP id p10mr1154556huc.1165777743371; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:09:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.160.4 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:09:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 14:09:03 -0500 From: "Tsu-Fan Cheng" To: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: skype and other *phones X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 19:09:05 -0000 Hi people, hapy holiday! i have a question about the internet phone apps, what is the major difference between skype and other *phone system? and I know that bsd has limited support of sound card that works with skype in the past, I wonder if the support is getting better these days? and also how is the driver support for other *phone apps? thank you for your time!! TFC From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 19:23:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A127C16A40F for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 19:23:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C96843C9F for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 19:22:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1036905uge for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:23:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=E+cs47nejz9M5Oyh9+P4RvJjwgxQolGrF0BshN3/75AB/KBTzhFot3QDR6yWqhsKodWkCpJBGAQqFLTlRVnp/n2VRsWxdUPF5z8fppa2ePqk+tkpr5Ye8DHdOmpHVN+KksyE8qxAHsJReaMKIpGSnvztoao57P5kbvWJNKubHXw= Received: by 10.67.26.7 with SMTP id d7mr8654415ugj.1165778627968; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:23:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.27.15 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:23:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <499c70c0612101123g3ea1465n33c040e2804a2906@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:23:47 +0300 From: "Abdullah Al-Marrie" To: "User Questions" In-Reply-To: <20061210081620.0A44.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061209225506.GD69299@dan.emsphone.com> <499c70c0612092220p6c603fd5h4d491ed02b8af1fa@mail.gmail.com> <20061210081620.0A44.GERARD@seibercom.net> Subject: Re: dns cache on a desktop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 19:23:49 -0000 On 12/10/06, Gerard Seibert wrote: > On Sunday December 10, 2006 at 01:20:37 (AM) Abdullah Al-Marrie wrote: > > > > On 12/10/06, Dan Nelson wrote: > > > In the last episode (Dec 09), Jonathan Horne said: > > > > how can i flush the dns cache on my desktop system? google turns up > > > > plenty on how to do it in linux or osx... but not freebsd. can > > > > someone clue me in? > > > > > > Just bounce named: /etc/rc.d/named restart > > > > > > If you are not running named, you have no cache to flush :) > > > > > > -- > > > > Is there away to cache dns for faster lookup, I don't run named? I use DHCP. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-dns.html > > -- > Gerard This only covers running named in the box. Is there a port can cache the dns in the desktop that doesn't run bind? -A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 20:03:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B68D16A415 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:03:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jan.grant@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from diri.bris.ac.uk (diri.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 308AF43CA2 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:02:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jan.grant@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.16.62]) by diri.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GtUt2-0004xW-KQ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:03:21 +0000 Received: from cse-jg.cse.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.12.37]:55316) by mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1GtUsj-000211-3R; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:02:41 +0000 Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:02:40 +0000 (GMT) From: Jan Grant X-X-Sender: cmjg@tribble.ilrt.bris.ac.uk To: White Hat In-Reply-To: <20061210133927.6212.qmail@web34404.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20061210200053.R61342@tribble.ilrt.bris.ac.uk> References: <20061210133927.6212.qmail@web34404.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-ILRT-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ILRT-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-0.403, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44, AWL 1.04) X-ILRT-MailScanner-From: jan.grant@bristol.ac.uk X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -1.3 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: FreeBSD Users Questions Subject: Re: Atomic Update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:03:23 -0000 On Sun, 10 Dec 2006, White Hat wrote: > I am not sure what the correct procedure is to do an > atomic update. > > Scenario: > > 1) Download database-1. This database is going to > replace an identically named database. Since I cannot > shut down the program that is using this database, > what would be the best way to insert the new database. > I was thinking that I could use the 'mv' command as > opposed to 'cp', but I am not sure. You don't mention what software is consuming your database file. It's true that "mv" within a filesystem is an atomic operation, it is not necessarily the case that an arbitrary program that is using the target file will notice the change; for instance, if the target program just has an open filehandle to the file, then it would need to reopen the file once the replacement had taken place. -- jan grant, ISYS, University of Bristol. http://www.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44 (0)117 3317661 http://ioctl.org/jan/ The Java disclaimer: values of 'anywhere' may vary between regions. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 20:07:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B9F516A415 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:07:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1ADD43CB1 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:06:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [10.35.4.65] (65.4-35-10-static.chueca.wifi [10.35.4.65]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D924F2E037 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 21:07:18 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <457C686E.5050504@locolomo.org> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 21:05:02 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms000300090906000408010602" Cc: Subject: How safe is encrypted disks? (data integrity) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:07:29 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms000300090906000408010602 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi: I have been thinking to make /home on my laptop encrypted - seems like a good idea if it gets stolen. Now, how safe is this? Not in terms of the strength of the encryption algorithm, but in terms of integrity. What happens in case of power failure, the battery runs out or system crashes for whatever reason? Normally this is not a big problem if it is temporary data anyway such as the Firefox cache, but I'd hate if this can take the entire disk down the drain... Thanks, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org --------------ms000300090906000408010602 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIK6DCC BXAwggRYoAMCAQICBEVUK6IwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwMTELMAkGA1UEBhMCREsxDDAKBgNV BAoTA1REQzEUMBIGA1UEAxMLVERDIE9DRVMgQ0EwHhcNMDYxMTE1MDgzMTU0WhcNMDgxMTE1 MDkwMTU0WjB1MQswCQYDVQQGEwJESzEpMCcGA1UEChMgSW5nZW4gb3JnYW5pc2F0b3Jpc2sg dGlsa255dG5pbmcxOzAUBgNVBAMUDUVyaWsgTvhyZ2FhcmQwIwYDVQQFExxQSUQ6OTgwMi0y MDAyLTItNTQ0MzY5NzY5MzE1MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQC1/K6+GVcF UvoWJpyfhzWbu8qEOB8jU17A0dpmts7RT+ODkYq0lxJCcvvdSXNQQurvYwaPISA+EMRy+rIm rjhoyxhsM9w/XC7gELqkr1XbGt3wR0KLr5ZcRfD4HqrWM1Eh1OYxTXKod6Ox/FAqzDAy91x8 XCZzsHtiBCdgMSYxqwIDAQABo4ICzjCCAsowDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgP4MCsGA1UdEAQkMCKA DzIwMDYxMTE1MDgzMTU0WoEPMjAwODExMTUwOTAxNTRaMIIBNwYDVR0gBIIBLjCCASowggEm BgoqgVCBKQEBAQEDMIIBFjAvBggrBgEFBQcCARYjaHR0cDovL3d3dy5jZXJ0aWZpa2F0LmRr L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkwgeIGCCsGAQUFBwICMIHVMAoWA1REQzADAgEBGoHGRm9yIGFudmVuZGVs c2UgYWYgY2VydGlmaWthdGV0IGfmbGRlciBPQ0VTIHZpbGvlciwgQ1BTIG9nIE9DRVMgQ1As IGRlciBrYW4gaGVudGVzIGZyYSB3d3cuY2VydGlmaWthdC5kay9yZXBvc2l0b3J5LiBCZW3m cmssIGF0IFREQyBlZnRlciB2aWxr5XJlbmUgaGFyIGV0IGJlZ3LmbnNldCBhbnN2YXIgaWZ0 LiBwcm9mZXNzaW9uZWxsZSBwYXJ0ZXIuMEEGCCsGAQUFBwEBBDUwMzAxBggrBgEFBQcwAYYl aHR0cDovL29jc3AuY2VydGlmaWthdC5kay9vY3NwL3N0YXR1czAgBgNVHREEGTAXgRVub3Jn YWFyZEBsb2NvbG9tby5vcmcwgYQGA1UdHwR9MHswS6BJoEekRTBDMQswCQYDVQQGEwJESzEM MAoGA1UEChMDVERDMRQwEgYDVQQDEwtUREMgT0NFUyBDQTEQMA4GA1UEAxMHQ1JMMTU1NzAs oCqgKIYmaHR0cDovL2NybC5vY2VzLmNlcnRpZmlrYXQuZGsvb2Nlcy5jcmwwHwYDVR0jBBgw FoAUYLWF7FZkfhIZJ2cdUBVLc647+RIwHQYDVR0OBBYEFPd+a0ceJ9JmK934UXsB3G0mjv+f MAkGA1UdEwQCMAAwGQYJKoZIhvZ9B0EABAwwChsEVjcuMQMCA6gwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAD ggEBAE9KhX+l/ZcnhvGPhHyWnJspyCXSiuqZ+GlgMdcKXtlu8kXsqNzfDe9qSs93++zJS+HT vAW0QgyIxjY1VpgCqgyjU8e2d2D1eSRMDB09WViZk8oZkvOy0Mq3yy//CLSw3gQbXNZF+Yt+ htss+FD+idACVyRBQqlcHuaxjguyzZkK0fGBN5H5nsklDySQCU7X0i3egeIiL7zlV3cjp9KT 12tNG4jfQTaSUzBkz0R+x+Jcdyp6AI9Qg3H1iGDDI58aCTY5ohQBpDsUcLr6U842IACNCeub qDP6nDo5lnMEXwGH/RO8r4supCf5wrNRjqEX/vokUzB5QfDGtmxxZkycaaQwggVwMIIEWKAD AgECAgRFVCuiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMDExCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRLMQwwCgYDVQQKEwNUREMx FDASBgNVBAMTC1REQyBPQ0VTIENBMB4XDTA2MTExNTA4MzE1NFoXDTA4MTExNTA5MDE1NFow dTELMAkGA1UEBhMCREsxKTAnBgNVBAoTIEluZ2VuIG9yZ2FuaXNhdG9yaXNrIHRpbGtueXRu aW5nMTswFAYDVQQDFA1FcmlrIE74cmdhYXJkMCMGA1UEBRMcUElEOjk4MDItMjAwMi0yLTU0 NDM2OTc2OTMxNTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAtfyuvhlXBVL6Fiacn4c1 m7vKhDgfI1NewNHaZrbO0U/jg5GKtJcSQnL73UlzUELq72MGjyEgPhDEcvqyJq44aMsYbDPc P1wu4BC6pK9V2xrd8EdCi6+WXEXw+B6q1jNRIdTmMU1yqHejsfxQKswwMvdcfFwmc7B7YgQn YDEmMasCAwEAAaOCAs4wggLKMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwID+DArBgNVHRAEJDAigA8yMDA2MTEx NTA4MzE1NFqBDzIwMDgxMTE1MDkwMTU0WjCCATcGA1UdIASCAS4wggEqMIIBJgYKKoFQgSkB AQEBAzCCARYwLwYIKwYBBQUHAgEWI2h0dHA6Ly93d3cuY2VydGlmaWthdC5kay9yZXBvc2l0 b3J5MIHiBggrBgEFBQcCAjCB1TAKFgNUREMwAwIBARqBxkZvciBhbnZlbmRlbHNlIGFmIGNl cnRpZmlrYXRldCBn5mxkZXIgT0NFUyB2aWxr5XIsIENQUyBvZyBPQ0VTIENQLCBkZXIga2Fu IGhlbnRlcyBmcmEgd3d3LmNlcnRpZmlrYXQuZGsvcmVwb3NpdG9yeS4gQmVt5nJrLCBhdCBU REMgZWZ0ZXIgdmlsa+VyZW5lIGhhciBldCBiZWdy5m5zZXQgYW5zdmFyIGlmdC4gcHJvZmVz c2lvbmVsbGUgcGFydGVyLjBBBggrBgEFBQcBAQQ1MDMwMQYIKwYBBQUHMAGGJWh0dHA6Ly9v Y3NwLmNlcnRpZmlrYXQuZGsvb2NzcC9zdGF0dXMwIAYDVR0RBBkwF4EVbm9yZ2FhcmRAbG9j b2xvbW8ub3JnMIGEBgNVHR8EfTB7MEugSaBHpEUwQzELMAkGA1UEBhMCREsxDDAKBgNVBAoT A1REQzEUMBIGA1UEAxMLVERDIE9DRVMgQ0ExEDAOBgNVBAMTB0NSTDE1NTcwLKAqoCiGJmh0 dHA6Ly9jcmwub2Nlcy5jZXJ0aWZpa2F0LmRrL29jZXMuY3JsMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFGC1hexW ZH4SGSdnHVAVS3OuO/kSMB0GA1UdDgQWBBT3fmtHHifSZivd+FF7AdxtJo7/nzAJBgNVHRME AjAAMBkGCSqGSIb2fQdBAAQMMAobBFY3LjEDAgOoMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQBPSoV/ pf2XJ4bxj4R8lpybKcgl0orqmfhpYDHXCl7ZbvJF7Kjc3w3vakrPd/vsyUvh07wFtEIMiMY2 NVaYAqoMo1PHtndg9XkkTAwdPVlYmZPKGZLzstDKt8sv/wi0sN4EG1zWRfmLfobbLPhQ/onQ AlckQUKpXB7msY4Lss2ZCtHxgTeR+Z7JJQ8kkAlO19It3oHiIi+85Vd3I6fSk9drTRuI30E2 klMwZM9EfsfiXHcqegCPUINx9YhgwyOfGgk2OaIUAaQ7FHC6+lPONiAAjQnrm6gz+pw6OZZz BF8Bh/0TvK+LLqQn+cKzUY6hF/76JFMweUHwxrZscWZMnGmkMYICKjCCAiYCAQEwOTAxMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJESzEMMAoGA1UEChMDVERDMRQwEgYDVQQDEwtUREMgT0NFUyBDQQIERVQrojAJ BgUrDgMCGgUAoIIBRzAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEP Fw0wNjEyMTAyMDA1MDJaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBRZX8/RfP7F86nUzAEK3b/nh3r+/DBI BgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxOzA5MDExCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRLMQwwCgYDVQQKEwNUREMxFDASBgNVBAMT C1REQyBPQ0VTIENBAgRFVCuiMEoGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMTugOTAxMQswCQYDVQQGEwJESzEM MAoGA1UEChMDVERDMRQwEgYDVQQDEwtUREMgT0NFUyBDQQIERVQrojBSBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8x RTBDMAoGCCqGSIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUrDgMC BzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASBgEXAAS05LqxR8DzPA4F4aN26dQxT h+U2WPcMy71V3VCcoUPY8y22NOPIPtDJzbNprHNPaMpFBqXcVZGb9Oe1eSwRp6+uXU7IEnQw CQFUeXeGqnZb4MiQPQK45ihj6IJhzCsCPo+8Z58ECvfPOwLbWwBUWPo+HqCUKOkRXwoQtF3p AAAAAAAA --------------ms000300090906000408010602-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 20:19:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E55FA16A415 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:19:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael@ircgnet.net) Received: from ws6-2.us4.outblaze.com (ws6-2.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2D4A43CA4 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:18:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael@ircgnet.net) Received: (qmail 30623 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2006 20:19:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (michael@ircgnet.net@67.168.235.146) by ws6-2.us4.outblaze.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2006 20:19:24 -0000 Message-ID: <457C6BE6.1070906@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:19:50 -0800 From: Michael User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD - Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Test X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:19:25 -0000 Testing Thanks, Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 20:32:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F3716A407 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:32:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from mailout.zetnet.co.uk (mailout.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.47.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B11143CF4 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:29:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from irwell.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.48] helo=zetnet.co.uk) by mailout.zetnet.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GtVK1-0005Bz-48 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:30:53 +0000 Received: from esperance.zetnet.co.uk (54-144.adsl.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.54.144]) by zetnet.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-2) with SMTP id kBAKUqsp023744 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:30:52 GMT Received: (qmail 38855 invoked by uid 1001); 10 Dec 2006 20:30:46 -0000 From: "Frank Shute" Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:30:46 +0000 To: Abdullah Al-Marrie Message-ID: <20061210203046.GA38844@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <20061209225506.GD69299@dan.emsphone.com> <499c70c0612092220p6c603fd5h4d491ed02b8af1fa@mail.gmail.com> <20061210081620.0A44.GERARD@seibercom.net> <499c70c0612101123g3ea1465n33c040e2804a2906@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <499c70c0612101123g3ea1465n33c040e2804a2906@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RC1 i386 X-Organisation: 'Esperance Linux' X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (zetnet.co.uk [194.247.46.1]); Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:30:53 +0000 (GMT) Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: dns cache on a desktop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:32:42 -0000 On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 10:23:47PM +0300, Abdullah Al-Marrie wrote: > > On 12/10/06, Gerard Seibert wrote: > >On Sunday December 10, 2006 at 01:20:37 (AM) Abdullah Al-Marrie wrote: > > > > > >> On 12/10/06, Dan Nelson wrote: > >> > In the last episode (Dec 09), Jonathan Horne said: > >> > > how can i flush the dns cache on my desktop system? google turns up > >> > > plenty on how to do it in linux or osx... but not freebsd. can > >> > > someone clue me in? > >> > > >> > Just bounce named: /etc/rc.d/named restart > >> > > >> > If you are not running named, you have no cache to flush :) > >> > > >> > -- > >> > >> Is there away to cache dns for faster lookup, I don't run named? I use > >DHCP. > > > >http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-dns.html > > > >-- > >Gerard > > This only covers running named in the box. > > Is there a port can cache the dns in the desktop that doesn't run bind? > dns/pdnsd -- Frank echo "f r a n k @ e s p e r a n c e - l i n u x . c o . u k" | sed 's/ //g' --->PGP keyID: 0x10BD6F4B<--- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 20:45:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2747B16A51A for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:45:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E81D643CBF for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:44:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBAKjGBH006797 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:45:16 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.5.99] (nilakantha.cs.washington.edu [128.208.5.99]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBAKjGnU005597 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:45:16 -0800 Message-ID: <457C71DB.3000706@u.washington.edu> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:45:15 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200612100905.30430.kirk@strauser.com> <20061210155022.GA28750@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <457C4156.8010309@computer.org> <17788.21019.357739.300962@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <17788.21019.357739.300962@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2006.12.10.122933 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: Advantages of trimmed kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:45:27 -0000 Robert Huff wrote: > Eric Schuele writes: > > >> FWIW... Its my understanding that >> - the memory saved would be negligible. >> > > How are we defining "negligible"? I know I've seen a pruned > kernel 25% smaller than GENERIC for the same release; I /think/ I've > seen one 33% smaller. Is that difference important? DammifIkno. > IF you're feeling paranoid, compile and install both. > (Assuming I'm correct in believing they install clean to separate > directories.) > > > Robert Huff > (running a custom kernel since 2.mumble) > As others have mentioned, the pluses to running a kernel without many of the trimmings is the fact that it does take less memory and less time to boot up / probe. Although this really isn't much of an issue with newer machines, due to the amount of available RAM in the machine (typically 512MB~1GB+), this does make a difference for some embedded systems and "limited resource architectures" (Pentium Pro, Pentium 2, etc), where RAM is a more of a luxury than on general purpose computers / servers. One thing that I will note though, is that compile time is also a factor for having a smaller kernel. I can recompile my kernel faster when I do source upgrades than I could with a generic kernel and all of the modules ("NO_MODULES = *" in make.conf). However, doing this has bit me in the arse a few times, so ultimately I recommend compiling / removing whatever you need with caution. My advice: heed what Lane said, but you can also trim down your kernel intelligently. You can save memory and disk space, as well as reduce recompile time in the long run by having a properly trimmed kernel. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 22:14:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6B016A55A for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:14:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from smtp.utwente.nl (smtp1.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF931441B6 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:00:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from nox.student.utwente.nl (nox.student.utwente.nl [130.89.165.91]) by smtp.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id kBAM1DLr018751; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:01:16 +0100 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:01:13 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200612082010.42744.news@budostore.de> <200612101314.01945.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <200612101314.01945.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612102301.13124.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: RW Subject: Re: Configuration of Grub? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:14:24 -0000 On Sunday 10 December 2006 14:14, RW wrote: > I'm curious as to why people care about UFS support, since chainloading > works just fine without filesystem support. I have my menu.lst on a UFS filesystem. > > Is there a good reason for prefering "kernel /boot/loader" over > chainloading on FreeBSD? Because we can? :P Cheers, Pieter de Goeje From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 22:27:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF07316A407 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:27:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from smtp.utwente.nl (smtp2.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD83443D3 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:05:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from nox.student.utwente.nl (nox.student.utwente.nl [130.89.165.91]) by smtp.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id kBAM6eox023185; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:06:42 +0100 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:06:40 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <1165691646.3362.4.camel@arwen> In-Reply-To: <1165691646.3362.4.camel@arwen> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612102306.40427.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: dick hoogendijk Subject: Re: X server remote login X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:27:59 -0000 On Saturday 09 December 2006 20:14, dick hoogendijk wrote: > I run solaris and FreeBSD. In solaris I can login on a remote machine > with an X session. I can't see my freebsd machine though. I have no idea > where the config to make this possible resides on FreeBSD. I guess X > runs without broadcasting itself on fbsd. How can I change this? You need to enable XDMCP see: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x-xdm.html#AEN6864 Regards, Pieter de Goeje From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 22:28:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B04CD16A59A for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:28:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@budostore.de) Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de (mo-p00-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EBC544473 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:07:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from news@budostore.de) Received: from nor75-5-82-235-173-77.fbx.proxad.net (nor75-5-82-235-173-77.fbx.proxad.net [82.235.173.77]) by post.webmailer.de (klopstock mo62) (RZmta 3.8) with ESMTP id iBAHtCDw05b2fE for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:08:15 +0100 (MET) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:08:15 +0100 (MET) From: Karl Sinn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612102300.39424.news@budostore.de> X-RZG-AUTH: ibDpgOm8RLcSc5zBxTj4 Subject: Networkdevice configuration: reboot necessary? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:28:25 -0000 Hi, I went on with the configuration of my first FreeBSD computer. And I found something amazing: After the configuration of the network device with sysinstall the network did not work immediately. In the handbook it is written to reboot after configuration. Is this really necessary? Is there no other way to change the configuration without turning of the computer? Thanks Karl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 22:44:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3307616A415 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:44:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from smtp.utwente.nl (smtp2.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9716343E74 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:34:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from nox.student.utwente.nl (nox.student.utwente.nl [130.89.165.91]) by smtp.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id kBAMZpox027860; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:35:51 +0100 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:35:51 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061210101712.L99842@chylonia.3miasto.net> In-Reply-To: <20061210101712.L99842@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612102335.51189.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Wojciech Puchar Subject: Re: strange server reboots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:44:19 -0000 On Sunday 10 December 2006 10:19, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > every 2-3 weeks i got server reboot. no panic no errors just reboot. > server are connected to UPS it's not power problem, and ALWAYS the same > after effect is comming - squid's swap.state files are wrong (possibly > emply), squid "sees" empty cache after that reboot. > > i have to rm swap.state* and rerun squid and wait quite a bit time until > it rebuild database. > > any idea? > > FreeBSD 6.2-RC1/amd64 This sounds like bad hardware. Try swapping RAM. Regards, Pieter de Goeje From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 23:06:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6A916A4D4 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:06:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B986443D36 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:04:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBAN5XIu001041; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:05:33 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk from=m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk; sender-id=permerror; spf=permerror X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk kBAN5XIu001041 Message-ID: <457C92B7.5040502@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:05:27 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Karl Sinn References: <200612102300.39424.news@budostore.de> In-Reply-To: <200612102300.39424.news@budostore.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig1711ACC06795F77B640464BA" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:05:43 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.6/2314/Sun Dec 10 20:02:13 2006 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_POLICY_TESTING,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Networkdevice configuration: reboot necessary? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:06:34 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig1711ACC06795F77B640464BA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Karl Sinn wrote: > I went on with the configuration of my first FreeBSD computer. And I fo= und=20 > something amazing: >=20 > After the configuration of the network device with sysinstall the netwo= rk did=20 > not work immediately. > In the handbook it is written to reboot after configuration. Hmmm... sysinstall will usually prompt you to bring up a network interfac= e after you've filled out the appropriate menu stuff. =20 What sysinstall is doing behind the scenes is rewriting the settings in /etc/rc.conf. As you've discovered, that only has any effect when runnin= g the scripts in /etc/rc.d (or /usr/local/etc/rc.d) -- ie. generally when rebooting. In fact, what sysinstall does is append new settings to the end of rc.conf, confusingly leaving the old ones still at the top of the file. You would be well advised (for the sake of your own sanity, if nothing else) to learn how to edit rc.conf directly to make such configuration changes, plus keep the file trimmed of old entries and extraneous fluff. > Is this really necessary?=20 > Is there no other way to change the configuration without turning of th= e=20 > computer? Of course there is. You just run ifconfig from the command line, like you would with any other unix system. Of course, that pre-supposes you know what to put onto the ifconfig command line: the ifconfig(8) manual page is a good place to start. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig1711ACC06795F77B640464BA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD4DBQFFfJK98Mjk52CukIwRCGddAJ9JusP5r0KBFHtQCRWqVjvqsgYmygCXWWl1 NKzdbxdLJrABXtfoywXovw== =Doew -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig1711ACC06795F77B640464BA-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 23:11:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A524416A403 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:11:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nwatson@nwatson.org) Received: from cirrus.ash.nwatson.org (c-69-244-235-114.hsd1.va.comcast.net [69.244.235.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341C643CA3 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:09:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nwatson@nwatson.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by cirrus.ash.nwatson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3603A154DA9 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 18:11:30 -0500 (EST) X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Processed: Sun Dec 10 18:11:27 2006 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9996 X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000 X-DSPAM-Signature: 457c941f213251159517313 X-DSPAM-Factors: 27, X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at X-Spam-Score: -0.761 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.761 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.44, AWL=0.779, DSPAM_HAM=-0.1] Received: from cirrus.ash.nwatson.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cirrus.ash.nwatson.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U5+L19-qtpGg for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 18:11:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from cirrus.ash.nwatson.org (cirrus.ash.nwatson.org [10.0.0.2]) by cirrus.ash.nwatson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F1E154DA6 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 18:11:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3083783.171165792287615.JavaMail.root@cirrus> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 18:11:27 -0500 (EST) From: Nathan Watson To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: ipf stateful rules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:11:05 -0000 Hello, I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 with IPF/IPNAT, and I'm having a problem getting my rules to work. The problem is mainly that I want no restrictions on outbound traffic, and I'm not sure how to apply stateful filtering to that. I have the following rule (hme0 is my external interface): pass out quick on hme0 all If I change that to "pass out quick on hme0 all keep state," will that only open the port that the outbound packet was on? Are there any problems that can arise from allowing all outbound traffic? At the moment, my ruleset doesn't pass packets at all... I'm just having lots of troubles here. My ruleset is below, and everything seems to be caught by the last block all rule. Any suggestions? Thanks, nwatson # no restrictions on internal LAN pass out quick on hme1 all pass in quick on hme1 all # no restrictions on loopback pass out quick on lo0 all pass in quick on lo0 all # no outbound restrictions pass out quick on hme0 all keep state # block all from non-routable or reserved address space block in quick on hme0 from 172.16.0.0/12 to any # private block in quick on hme0 from 10.0.0.0/8 to any # private block in quick on hme0 from 127.0.0.0/8 to any # loopback block in quick on hme0 from 0.0.0.0/8 to any # loopback block in quick on hme0 from 169.254.0.0/16 to any # dhcp auto-config block in quick on hme0 from 192.0.2.0/24 to any # reserved for docs block in quick on hme0 from 204.152.64.0/23 to any # sun cluster interconnect block in quick on hme0 from 224.0.0.0/3 to any # class d & e multicast # inbound blocks block in quick on hme0 all with frags # frags block in quick on hme0 proto tcp all with short # short tcp packets block in quick on hme0 all with opt lsrr # source routed packets block in quick on hme0 all with opt ssrr # source routed packets block in log first quick on hme0 proto tcp from any to any flags FUP # nmap os fingerprint attempts, log block in quick on hme0 all with ipopts # anything with special options block in quick on hme0 proto icmp all icmp-type 8 # public pings block in log first quick on hme0 proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 137 # netbios name block in log first quick on hme0 proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 138 # netbios datagram block in log first quick on hme0 proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 139 # netbios session block in log first quick on hme0 proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 81 # hosts2 name server requests # allow these pass in quick on hme0 proto tcp from any to any port = 22 flags S keep state # ssh pass in quick on hme0 proto tcp from any to any port = 25 flags S keep state # smtp pass in quick on hme0 proto tcp from any to any port = 236 flags S keep state # http pass in quick on hme0 proto tcp from any to any port = 237 flags S keep state # zimbra https pass in quick on hme0 proto tcp from any to any port = 113 flags S keep state # ident pass in quick on hme0 proto tcp from any to any port 5800 >< 5900 flags S keep state # vnc pass in quick on hme0 proto tcp/udp from any to any port 6881 >< 6889 keep state # bittorrent pass in quick on hme0 proto tcp from any to any port = 7071 flags S keep state # zimbra admin https # block, log all remaining traffic block in log first quick on hme0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 23:16:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCEC16A4FD for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:16:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B9D043DAD for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:14:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GtXtL-0003hk-58 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 18:15:31 -0500 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost.localnet.local [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kBANI6Pp092506 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:18:06 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id kBANI60s092505 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:18:06 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:18:05 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200612102300.39424.news@budostore.de> <457C92B7.5040502@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <457C92B7.5040502@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612101718.06068.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec797c33f75e734a515182a48811adfbce2d350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Re: Networkdevice configuration: reboot necessary? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:16:44 -0000 On Sunday 10 December 2006 17:05, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Karl Sinn wrote: > > I went on with the configuration of my first FreeBSD computer. And I > > found something amazing: > > > > After the configuration of the network device with sysinstall the network > > did not work immediately. > > In the handbook it is written to reboot after configuration. > > Hmmm... sysinstall will usually prompt you to bring up a network interface > after you've filled out the appropriate menu stuff. > > What sysinstall is doing behind the scenes is rewriting the settings in > /etc/rc.conf. As you've discovered, that only has any effect when running > the scripts in /etc/rc.d (or /usr/local/etc/rc.d) -- ie. generally when > rebooting. In fact, what sysinstall does is append new settings to the > end of rc.conf, confusingly leaving the old ones still at the top of the > file. You would be well advised (for the sake of your own sanity, if > nothing else) to learn how to edit rc.conf directly to make such > configuration changes, plus keep the file trimmed of old entries and > extraneous fluff. > > > Is this really necessary? > > Is there no other way to change the configuration without turning of the > > computer? > > Of course there is. You just run ifconfig from the command line, > like you would with any other unix system. Of course, that pre-supposes > you know what to put onto the ifconfig command line: the ifconfig(8) > manual page is a good place to start. > > Cheers, > > Matthew Maybe /etc/rc.d/netif restart is a quick way to apply the configuration changes in /etc/rc.conf. Of course nothing is as good as knowing ifconfig(8) ... and one day I will scratch that off my "to do" list :) lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 23:20:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F205216A407 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:20:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan-tiefert@t-online.de) Received: from mailout07.sul.t-online.com (mailout07.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 076AF43CCF for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:19:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stevan-tiefert@t-online.de) Received: from fwd26.aul.t-online.de by mailout07.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1GtXyM-0000G0-03; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:20:42 +0100 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (XVy0tvZ1Yei3ZhSO+MhrUSe4sLxZNK-Jm-h0TmQbsO+NMsICkczz4r@[84.165.77.105]) by fwd26.sul.t-online.de with smtp id 1GtXyL-0i7WWu0; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:20:41 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: stevan-tiefert@t-online.de (Stevan Tiefert) To: X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 5.00.0036 Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable Date: 10 Dec 2006 16:10 GMT Message-ID: <1GtXyL-0i7WWu0@fwd26.sul.t-online.de> X-ID: XVy0tvZ1Yei3ZhSO+MhrUSe4sLxZNK-Jm-h0TmQbsO+NMsICkczz4r X-TOI-MSGID: 8d10f524-d044-4f6f-b740-ea2563559dc5 Subject: Dowload FreeBSD 6.1 via bittorrent X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:20:53 -0000 Hello, does somebody knows why the torrents for FreeBSD 6.1 is not working? Will i= t ever works in the future? With regards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 23:28:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A465B16A40F for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:28:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perikillo@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D69643CBD for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:27:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from perikillo@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so1737225nfc for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:28:42 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=J4Rq/91AZFw7DRv2siBNWjwPfXpEXdK5yDMLeIHSaoi6N7s5TvdZtM8LX8evLJNnMdqcBMuMYUAeiKIgFwSp6NaJ5LglEsuKcHPIKpefkGN/N/L9ukVDtHB+xYbw3PW2c9jdu/MwKRh16/UlaZGOy0wfSIEqC0NRcBXwqImNbCo= Received: by 10.82.110.14 with SMTP id i14mr218282buc.1165793321745; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:28:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.178.5 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:28:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <51d7a5160612101528j470f1db9v623c27213a410529@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:28:41 -0800 From: perikillo To: "FreeBSD Mailing List" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: VPN Solution for my current Situation. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:28:55 -0000 Hi people. I want to know which is the best VPN solution i need to my current situation: 2 Offices 1 Mexico-Tijuana 1 E.U.-Otay Mesa(both in the border). In E.U. Offices with have: DNS+Firewall+Proxy Linux Mail Server Linux Samba Linux PBX Altigen Win NT ERP DBA Linux Backup FreeBSD. Mexico PBX Same system Samba ERP DBA(This is the busies from both sites) Backup FreeBSD 65 User 55 Mexico 10 E.U. 40 user in Mexico have mail account && only 15 Internet access all the users in E.U have mail account && Internet access. We share files, E.U. users access the ERP system in Mexico. If the users in Mexico need Internet, they have to reach the proxy in E.U. Both PBX systems have communication for company internal calls, external calls. All this communication of Voice and Data goes over one private link, but next year our contract is going to finish, them we need to negotiate the next contract. Another thing, is that we are planning to start the VoIP solution and see is we can remove our current PBX system with Asterisk. My questions es this: Supposed that we continue with the same Private Line, and we add another public line to do some VPN between both facilities if one link fail the other can continue(backup) or have both sharing the workload, with this workload which VPN solution is the best for my situation: IPsec, OpenVPN, etc? Speaking of FreeBSD, because there is where i want to deploy the VPN solution in Mexico, in E.U. we have there Linux, this can be problematic? Hope you understand my layout && english, any advice is welcome, thanks all for your time!!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 23:39:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D56F16A415 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:39:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from felix.schalck@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD08643CB6 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:36:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from felix.schalck@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2006 23:38:00 -0000 Received: from AStrasbourg-251-1-21-238.w82-126.abo.wanadoo.fr (EHLO [192.168.1.10]) [82.126.211.238] by mail.gmx.net (mp049) with SMTP; 11 Dec 2006 00:38:00 +0100 X-Authenticated: #23426003 Message-ID: <457C9A56.5090901@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:37:58 +0100 From: "felix.schalck" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061126) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <457C0422.7080609@gmx.net> <20061210131322.GA33464@gauss.sanabria.es> <20061210132330.GB33464@gauss.sanabria.es> In-Reply-To: <20061210132330.GB33464@gauss.sanabria.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: Freebsd dbus / hal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:39:28 -0000 José G. Juanino wrote: > El domingo 10 de diciembre a las 14:13:22 CET, José G. Juanino escribió: > >> El domingo 10 de diciembre a las 13:57:06 CET, felix.schalck escribió: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Does someone know a good how-to to set up dbus and hal under freebsd ? >>> Im trying to run gnome 2.16 , and it always claims not finding the >>> dbus-socket to connect to... >>> >> Add the following in the .xinitrc file: >> >> eval `dbus-launch` >> export DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS DBUS_SESSION_BUS_PID >> > > I forget that is also necessary start dbus-daemon. The best way is in > rc.conf: > > dbus_enable="YES" > Thank you for your help, but it's still not working: got the same error. Is there any way to get it verbose ? Perhaps I'm missing some package/config. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 00:34:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9D916A415 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:34:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from ext-gw.lemis.com (ext-gw.lemis.com [150.101.14.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC63C43CA1 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:33:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by ext-gw.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0D94133573; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:04:42 +1030 (CST) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id C61119BEF6; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:04:42 +1030 (CST) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:04:42 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Tsu-Fan Cheng Message-ID: <20061211003442.GI34082@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BghK6+krpKHjj+jk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 VoIP: sip:0871270137@sip.internode.on.net WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: skype and other *phones X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:34:45 -0000 --BghK6+krpKHjj+jk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday, 10 December 2006 at 14:09:03 -0500, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: > Hi people, > hapy holiday! i have a question about the internet phone apps, what > is the major difference between skype and other *phone system? Skype is proprietary. It doesn't interact well with other systems. > and I know that bsd has limited support of sound card that works > with skype in the past, I wonder if the support is getting better > these days? and also how is the driver support for other *phone > apps? thank you for your time!! I don't know of any specific sound card problems. I'd be surprised if they only applied to one application. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --BghK6+krpKHjj+jk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFfKeiIubykFB6QiMRAs/3AJwImhKFCghDEMhG2wra9rOffgM5kwCgj8GD E/rhIEAT6c/UhZ28wNcRK0E= =4WUp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BghK6+krpKHjj+jk-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 00:42:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD9B16A403 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:42:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from valen@winterhill.net) Received: from mail.summerhost.net (mail.summerhost.net [64.106.242.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DCF743DBB for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:40:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from valen@winterhill.net) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (user-12hdp9n.cable.mindspring.com [69.22.229.55]) by mail.summerhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86AB5F4B31 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 19:41:08 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <457CA91E.3060006@winterhill.net> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 19:41:02 -0500 From: Valen Jones User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Major Version Upgrade - 4.11 to 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:42:46 -0000 I'm interested in upgrading from 4.11 to 5.x. I currently track 4.x stable using cvsup, but I've never done a major version upgrade. First, should I bother? My hardware has dual pentium 1.13 processors with 1G ram (I'm considering maxing it out at 4). I host a few domains on this machine and I have four jails configured on it which will have to be upgraded too. I have users counting particularly on mail service not being down for too long. Other than the obvious advice to start with a good backup, can anyone tell me: 1) Will I gain a major benefit from upgrading 2) Where should I look for instructions / advice on upgrading 3) Also any general advice from personal experience. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 01:02:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7914C16A505 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 01:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01EB43DF0 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:59:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.localdomain (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 206A45193D for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:00:29 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 01:00:25 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200612100905.30430.kirk@strauser.com> <20061210155022.GA28750@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <457C4156.8010309@computer.org> In-Reply-To: <457C4156.8010309@computer.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612110100.26229.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> Subject: Re: Advantages of trimmed kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 01:02:10 -0000 On Sunday 10 December 2006 17:18, Eric Schuele wrote: > FWIW... Its my understanding that > - the memory saved would be negligible. As I understand it the argument in favour of smaller kernels isn't that they free-up memory for other uses, it's that they make better uses of memory cache. OTOH big blocks of code that are rarely entered probably aren't going to degrade performance much. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 01:47:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4306F16A40F for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 01:47:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juhasaarinen@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.238]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5281B43CA2 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 01:46:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from juhasaarinen@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so1318120wxc for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:47:34 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LAvyf8lYQ+FL03To+81bJEWrvuIzZ4ysYL0EEGKCsLApVeJeB8hvJP9UPQWbSRIhZ9T6i5kDZX64V7SYAtZojVSre5sm0FN5VsQ8PGGW0ioLN/8MQSictTTozMc9oQDjLO5llPWpHqvn5G31AXrXd1uHJcASokrjKuPmTG9+ykk= Received: by 10.70.39.2 with SMTP id m2mr11254968wxm.1165801653003; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:47:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.24.18 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:47:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:47:32 +1300 From: "Juha Saarinen" To: RW In-Reply-To: <200612110100.26229.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200612100905.30430.kirk@strauser.com> <20061210155022.GA28750@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <457C4156.8010309@computer.org> <200612110100.26229.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Advantages of trimmed kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 01:47:35 -0000 On 12/11/06, RW wrote: > As I understand it the argument in favour of smaller kernels isn't that they > free-up memory for other uses, it's that they make better uses of memory > cache. > > OTOH big blocks of code that are rarely entered probably aren't going to > degrade performance much. Security through less code? Hmm, dunno. -- Juha http://www.geekzone.co.nz/juha From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 01:54:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A9D716A407 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 01:54:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from stargate.alaskaparadise.com (114-103-74-65.gci.net [65.74.103.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9DE43CA1 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 01:53:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: by stargate.alaskaparadise.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id A896345F8; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:54:16 -0900 (AKST) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: Alaska Paradise Travel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:53:58 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <457CA91E.3060006@winterhill.net> In-Reply-To: <457CA91E.3060006@winterhill.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2079962.lYotq00EbR"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200612101654.14590.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Cc: Valen Jones Subject: Re: Major Version Upgrade - 4.11 to 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 01:54:19 -0000 --nextPart2079962.lYotq00EbR Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 10 December 2006 15:41, Valen Jones wrote: > I'm interested in upgrading from 4.11 to 5.x. I currently track 4.x > stable using cvsup, but I've never done a major version upgrade. > > First, should I bother? My hardware has dual pentium 1.13 processors > with 1G ram (I'm considering maxing it out at 4). I host a few domains > on this machine and I have four jails configured on it which will have > to be upgraded too. I have users counting particularly on mail service > not being down for too long. > > Other than the obvious advice to start with a good backup, can anyone > tell me: > > 1) Will I gain a major benefit from upgrading Yes, all development and support for 4.x will cease in a couple of months. > 2) Where should I look for instructions / advice on upgrading The handbook,, search the lists and read UPGRADING. > 3) Also any general advice from personal experience. If you're going to upgrade you might as well run 6.x. 5.x tended to be=20 problematic and 6.x is far more stable in my opinion. The ideal way is to d= o=20 a clean install. For one thing the filesystem has undergone significant=20 improvements which you won't have the benefit of unless you clean install.= =20 Other than that consider doing a binary upgrade, otherwise you will have to= =20 upgrade to 5.x before going to 6.x. Search this list as this exact subject= =20 came up a few days ago with some fairly detailed responses. Also, you shoul= d=20 plan on rebuilding ALL your ports even if your running compat 4. Good luck, Beech=20 =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart2079962.lYotq00EbR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFfLpGp5D0B1NlT4URAmPQAJ9F7ZBreADoGQOz8pafrvq09w6UnwCeIjY+ 2BngcUeThEivvfFV0ppLFWQ= =t/HJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2079962.lYotq00EbR-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 02:30:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B98716A492 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:30:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2304D43CA1 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:29:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.localdomain (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4006551977 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 21:30:51 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:30:47 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200612100905.30430.kirk@strauser.com> <200612110100.26229.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612110230.47544.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> Subject: Re: Advantages of trimmed kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:30:54 -0000 On Monday 11 December 2006 01:47, Juha Saarinen wrote: > On 12/11/06, RW wrote: > > As I understand it the argument in favour of smaller kernels isn't that > > they free-up memory for other uses, it's that they make better uses of > > memory cache. > > > > OTOH big blocks of code that are rarely entered probably aren't going to > > degrade performance much. > > Security through less code? Hmm, dunno. Who mentioned security? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 03:26:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3821316A407 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 03:26:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lonnie@outstep.com) Received: from mail.outstep.com (D2095.servadmin.com [12.158.188.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C4C43C9D for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 03:24:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lonnie@outstep.com) Received: (qmail 1395 invoked by uid 511); 10 Dec 2006 21:26:52 -0600 Received: from 68.32.113.56 by mail.outstep.com (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.87/2106. spamassassin: 3.1.3. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(68.32.113.56):SA:0(1.5/5.0):. Processed in 3.411755 secs); 11 Dec 2006 03:26:52 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 X-Spam-Level: + X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: lonnie@outstep.com via mail.outstep.com X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(68.32.113.56):SA:0(1.5/5.0):. Processed in 3.411755 secs Process 1386) Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.11?) (lonnie@outstep.com@68.32.113.56) by mail.outstep.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2006 21:26:48 -0600 Message-ID: <457CCFC4.9070807@outstep.com> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:25:56 -0500 From: Lonnie Cumberland User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: perikillo References: <51d7a5160612101528j470f1db9v623c27213a410529@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <51d7a5160612101528j470f1db9v623c27213a410529@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: VPN Solution for my current Situation. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 03:26:01 -0000 Greetings.... I've used OpenVPN in the past with great success although opinions may vary. Easy to install, use, and maintain.... Cheers, Lonnie perikillo wrote: > Hi people. > > I want to know which is the best VPN solution i need to my current > situation: > > 2 Offices 1 Mexico-Tijuana 1 E.U.-Otay Mesa(both in the border). > > In E.U. Offices with have: > > DNS+Firewall+Proxy Linux > Mail Server Linux > Samba Linux > PBX Altigen Win NT > ERP DBA Linux > Backup FreeBSD. > > Mexico > PBX Same system > Samba > ERP DBA(This is the busies from both sites) > Backup FreeBSD > > 65 User 55 Mexico 10 E.U. > 40 user in Mexico have mail account && only 15 Internet access > all the users in E.U have mail account && Internet access. > > We share files, E.U. users access the ERP system in Mexico. > > If the users in Mexico need Internet, they have to reach the proxy in > E.U. > > Both PBX systems have communication for company internal calls, external > calls. > > All this communication of Voice and Data goes over one private link, but > next year our contract is going to finish, them we need to negotiate the > next contract. > > Another thing, is that we are planning to start the VoIP solution and > see is > we can remove our current PBX system with Asterisk. > > My questions es this: Supposed that we continue with the same Private > Line, > and we add another public line to do some VPN between both facilities > if one > link fail the other can continue(backup) or have both sharing the > workload, > with this workload which VPN solution is the best for my situation: > > IPsec, OpenVPN, etc? > > Speaking of FreeBSD, because there is where i want to deploy the VPN > solution in Mexico, in E.U. we have there Linux, this can be problematic? > > Hope you understand my layout && english, any advice is welcome, > thanks all > for your time!!! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Thanks and have a good day, Lonnie T. Cumberland OutStep Technologies Incorporated Email: Lonnie@outstep.com Lonnie_Cumberland@yahoo.com "Open Source...... opening the doors for the future in the world of today...." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 04:18:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD5716A403 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:18:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from sccrmhc15.comcast.net (sccrmhc15.comcast.net [204.127.200.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1157343CA4 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:17:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [192.168.214.215] (cpe-76-184-133-124.tx.res.rr.com[76.184.133.124]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc15) with ESMTP id <200612110418580150070umae>; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:18:58 +0000 Message-ID: <457CDC30.9020102@computer.org> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:18:56 -0600 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061111) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: RW References: <200612100905.30430.kirk@strauser.com> <200612110100.26229.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> <200612110230.47544.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <200612110230.47544.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Advantages of trimmed kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:18:59 -0000 On 12/10/06 20:30, RW wrote: > On Monday 11 December 2006 01:47, Juha Saarinen wrote: >> On 12/11/06, RW wrote: >>> As I understand it the argument in favour of smaller kernels isn't that >>> they free-up memory for other uses, it's that they make better uses of >>> memory cache. >>> >>> OTOH big blocks of code that are rarely entered probably aren't going to >>> degrade performance much. >> Security through less code? Hmm, dunno. > > Who mentioned security? > I don't think anyone did... but the thought is in the right direction I think. With a smaller kernel and thus less code floating around... would the possibility of compromise be less? Sure, in some situations. See FreeBSD-SA-06:25.kmem. -Eric _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 04:24:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A716416A412 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:24:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koro@koro.bentala.co.id) Received: from smtp01.orion.net.id (smtp01.orion.net.id [203.84.155.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D815D43CA8 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:22:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from koro@koro.bentala.co.id) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp01.orion.net.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F3923C43; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:30:47 +0700 (WIT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at orion.net.id Received: from smtp01.orion.net.id ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp01.orion.net.id [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cLfemSjPNprh; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:30:47 +0700 (WIT) Received: from [192.168.2.231] (unknown [203.84.152.250]) by smtp01.orion.net.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A14023BF0; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:30:46 +0700 (WIT) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:22:54 +0700 (WIT) From: Abdullah Koro X-X-Sender: koro@pangrango.bentala.co.id To: Stevan Tiefert In-Reply-To: <1GtXyL-0i7WWu0@fwd26.sul.t-online.de> Message-ID: <20061211112145.K9462@pangrango.bentala.co.id> References: <1GtXyL-0i7WWu0@fwd26.sul.t-online.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dowload FreeBSD 6.1 via bittorrent X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:24:03 -0000 Hi Stevan Why don't you download via official freebsd ftp server. you can also download the ISO file right? regards, koro On Sun, 10 Dec 2006, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > Hello, > > does somebody knows why the torrents for FreeBSD 6.1 is not working? Will it ever works in the future? > > With regards > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 04:25:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E319E16A47C for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:25:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from weiwu@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from bossdog.realss.com (bossdog.realss.com [211.157.108.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190AD43C9D for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:24:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from weiwu@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by bossdog.realss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453001C00EA for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:26:08 +0800 (CST) Received: from bossdog.realss.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bossdog.realss.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17961-20 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:26:06 +0800 (CST) Received: from [218.193.55.195] (unknown [59.57.201.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bossdog.realss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E28F1C0033 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:26:05 +0800 (CST) From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=BC=A0=E9=9F=A1=E6=AD=A6?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:26:03 +0800 Message-Id: <1165811163.5474.14.camel@joe.realss.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bossdog.realss.com Subject: network analyse tool? To debug IMAP related problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:25:56 -0000 Hello. I would wish to have a tool that would do this kind of thing: 1. listen on imap port on localhost, connect to localhost with my email client; 2. forward the traffic from/to/between real imap server; 3. meanwhile, print everything being transfer-ed, so that I can have a good ovewview of server-client conversation; I don't know what such kind of tool is usually called and thus difficult to do an effective google search. I tried a few tools in ports/net but none of them seems to be working in this way... (admit that I didn't look into pkg-descr of every package) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 04:26:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D189316A494 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:26:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koro@koro.bentala.co.id) Received: from smtp01.orion.net.id (smtp01.orion.net.id [203.84.155.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EEAF43CAD for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:25:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from koro@koro.bentala.co.id) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp01.orion.net.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4644A23C4B; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:33:16 +0700 (WIT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at orion.net.id Received: from smtp01.orion.net.id ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp01.orion.net.id [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kjNB+8O+bhXv; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:33:16 +0700 (WIT) Received: from [192.168.2.231] (unknown [203.84.152.250]) by smtp01.orion.net.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0896223C4A; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:33:16 +0700 (WIT) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:25:24 +0700 (WIT) From: Abdullah Koro X-X-Sender: koro@pangrango.bentala.co.id To: perikillo In-Reply-To: <51d7a5160612101528j470f1db9v623c27213a410529@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20061211112405.N9462@pangrango.bentala.co.id> References: <51d7a5160612101528j470f1db9v623c27213a410529@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: VPN Solution for my current Situation. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:26:30 -0000 hi perikillo, I'm prefer to use PoPToP than the another one. If you want to easy setup, you can also put webmin on the same server. regards, koro On Sun, 10 Dec 2006, perikillo wrote: > > IPsec, OpenVPN, etc? > > Speaking of FreeBSD, because there is where i want to deploy the VPN > solution in Mexico, in E.U. we have there Linux, this can be problematic? > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 04:28:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE51B16A412 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:28:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from listvj@summerhost.net) Received: from mail.summerhost.net (mail.summerhost.net [64.106.242.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF8CB43CBD for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:26:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from listvj@summerhost.net) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (user-12hdp9n.cable.mindspring.com [69.22.229.55]) by mail.summerhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 423E6F4B2E for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:27:59 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <457CDE4B.2050103@summerhost.net> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:27:55 -0500 From: listvj User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:28:03 -0000 I'm interested in upgrading from 4.11 to 5.x. I currently track 4.x stable using cvsup, but I've never done a major version upgrade. First, should I bother? My hardware has dual pentium 1.13 processors with 1G ram (I'm considering maxing it out at 4). I host email and web sites for a few domains on this machine and I have four jails configured on it which will have to be upgraded too. I have users counting particularly on mail service not being down for too long. Other than the obvious advice to start with a good backup, can anyone tell me: 1) Will I gain a major benefit from upgrading 2) Where should I look for instructions / advice on upgrading 3) Also any general advice from personal experience. 4) Just how risky is this? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 04:31:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B993C16A415 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:31:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koro@koro.bentala.co.id) Received: from smtp01.orion.net.id (smtp01.orion.net.id [203.84.155.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DA743CAF for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:29:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from koro@koro.bentala.co.id) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp01.orion.net.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB5123C43; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:37:59 +0700 (WIT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at orion.net.id Received: from smtp01.orion.net.id ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp01.orion.net.id [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aa4uJYmQ3TvB; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:37:58 +0700 (WIT) Received: from [192.168.2.231] (unknown [203.84.152.250]) by smtp01.orion.net.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A34923C4F; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:37:58 +0700 (WIT) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:30:06 +0700 (WIT) From: Abdullah Koro X-X-Sender: koro@pangrango.bentala.co.id To: Nathan Watson In-Reply-To: <3083783.171165792287615.JavaMail.root@cirrus> Message-ID: <20061211112722.G9462@pangrango.bentala.co.id> References: <3083783.171165792287615.JavaMail.root@cirrus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: ipf stateful rules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:31:09 -0000 at the moment, i just use simple configuration that pass all traffic. nothing needed to be restrict. this is my NAT configuration sample and make it simple ;) #Jalankan NAT /sbin/natd -interface rl0 /sbin/ipfw -f flush /sbin/ipfw add divert natd all from any to any via rl0 /sbin/ipfw add pass all from any to any and the interfaces: > ifconfig rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=8 inet6 fe80::2e0:4cff:feaa:3e53%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 192.168.2.231 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255 ether 00:e0:4c:aa:3e:53 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active rl1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=8 inet6 fe80::213:46ff:fe3a:da6f%rl1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 inet 10.1.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.1.1.255 ether 00:13:46:3a:da:6f media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP) status: active plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 regards, koro On Sun, 10 Dec 2006, Nathan Watson wrote: > Hello, > I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 with IPF/IPNAT, and I'm having a problem getting my rules to work. The problem is mainly that I want no restrictions on outbound traffic, and I'm not sure how to apply stateful filtering to that. I have the following rule (hme0 is my external interface): > > pass out quick on hme0 all > > If I change that to "pass out quick on hme0 all keep state," will that only open the port that the outbound packet was on? Are there any problems that can arise from allowing all outbound traffic? At the moment, my ruleset doesn't pass packets at all... I'm just having lots of troubles here. My ruleset is below, and everything seems to be caught by the last block all rule. Any suggestions? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 04:40:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D912716A4A0 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:40:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD52443D2D for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:38:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from tripel (tripel [192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBB4d9cM085071; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:39:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:38:57 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Hill To: =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=BC=A0=E9=9F=A1=E6=AD=A6?= In-Reply-To: <1165811163.5474.14.camel@joe.realss.com> Message-ID: <20061210233158.K28255@tripel.monochrome.org> References: <1165811163.5474.14.camel@joe.realss.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-822175709-1165811937=:28255" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: network analyse tool? To debug IMAP related problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:40:29 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-822175709-1165811937=:28255 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, =E5=BC=A0=E9~_=A1=E6=AD=A6 wrote: > Hello. I would wish to have a tool that would do this kind of thing: > > 1. listen on imap port on localhost, connect to localhost with my > email client; > 2. forward the traffic from/to/between real imap server; > 3. meanwhile, print everything being transfer-ed, so that I can > have a good ovewview of server-client conversation; > > I don't know what such kind of tool is usually called and thus=20 > difficult to do an effective google search. I tried a few tools in=20 > ports/net but none of them seems to be working in this way... (admit=20 > that I didn't look into pkg-descr of every package) This sounds like a job for net/wireshark (formerly known as ethereal).=20 It won't forward as you describe, but will sit and monitor what goes=20 over the wire. You can have it only look at traffic to/from certain IP=20 addresses, and/or on certain ports; it's very flexible. You could run it=20 on any machine that the IMAP traffic passes through - your local=20 desktop, the server, any machine (gateway?) in between. HTH. -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] --0-822175709-1165811937=:28255-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 05:41:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D66216A403 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 05:41:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arminius@pubbox.net) Received: from pubbox.net (pubbox.net [81.169.167.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B7143C9D for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 05:39:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arminius@pubbox.net) Received: from e180070118.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.180.70.118] helo=pubbox.net) by pubbox.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GtduX-0008Dj-HU for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:41:09 +0100 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:41:25 +0100 From: Armin Arh To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061211054125.GB681@pubbox.net> References: <200612100905.30430.kirk@strauser.com> <20061210155022.GA28750@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <457C4156.8010309@computer.org> <200612110100.26229.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: arminius@pubbox.net Subject: Re: Advantages of trimmed kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 05:41:12 -0000 I think recompiling one owns Kernel becomes important when you want it to behave completely different. hardwired irq, other scheduler etc. Saving memory is only an issue when running on extra small hardware. (Like we all had ten years ago) Armin -- PUBBOX Postmaster + spam-killer. Free email addresses at http://pubbox.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 06:28:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABDE816A40F for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:28:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rob@coombs.anu.edu.au) Received: from canyonero.dot.net.au (canyonero.dot.net.au [202.147.68.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6949343CA3 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:27:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rob@coombs.anu.edu.au) Received: from [203.129.41.189] (helo=freebsd.connect-a.com.au) by canyonero.dot.net.au with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1GteeI-00048X-00 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:28:26 +1100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebsd.connect-a.com.au (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBB6SKPH007634 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:28:21 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from rob@coombs.anu.edu.au) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:28:20 +1100 (EST) From: Rob Hurle X-X-Sender: rob@freebsd.connect-a.com.au To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061211163203.P1311@freebsd.connect-a.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL autolearn=failed version=3.1.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on freebsd.connect-a.com.au Subject: Poptop - how to configure? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:28:28 -0000 Dear All, I am installing pptpd (aka poptop) on a 6.1 release box which is taking over the functions of a Debian box. VPN is needed and Debian used pptpd for this, so I decided to follow suit. However, I get errors that indicate that pptpd is not directing pppd to the correct options file. Part of the debug output from pptpd is: Dec 11 12:21:28 mail pptpd[54767]: MGR: Launching /usr/local/sbin/pptpctrl to handle client Dec 11 12:21:28 mail pptpd[54767]: CTRL: pppd options file = /etc/ppp/options.pptpd Dec 11 12:21:28 mail pptpd[54767]: CTRL: Received PPTP Control Message (type: 1) Dec 11 12:21:28 mail pptpd[54767]: CTRL: Made a START CTRL CONN RPLY packet Dec 11 12:21:28 mail pptpd[54767]: CTRL: I wrote 156 bytes to the client. Dec 11 12:21:28 mail pptpd[54767]: CTRL: Sent packet to client Dec 11 12:21:28 mail pptpd[54767]: CTRL: Received PPTP Control Message (type: 7) Dec 11 12:21:28 mail pptpd[54767]: CTRL: Set parameters to 100000000 maxbps, 64 window size Dec 11 12:21:28 mail pptpd[54767]: CTRL: Made a OUT CALL RPLY packet Dec 11 12:21:28 mail pptpd[54767]: CTRL: pty_fd = 7 Dec 11 12:21:28 mail pptpd[54767]: CTRL: tty_fd = 6 Dec 11 12:21:28 mail pptpd[54768]: CTRL (PPPD Launcher): program binary = /usr/local/sbin/pppd Dec 11 12:21:28 mail pptpd[54767]: CTRL: I wrote 32 bytes to the client. Dec 11 12:21:28 mail pptpd[54767]: CTRL: Sent packet to client Dec 11 12:21:28 mail pptpd[54767]: CTRL: Reaping child PPP[54768] Dec 11 12:21:28 mail pptpd[54767]: CTRL: Exiting now Dec 11 12:21:28 mail pptpd[54625]: MGR: Reaped child 54767 (I have also tried using /usr/sbin/pppd, with the same result). The error from pppd indicates that it is trying to access the options file /etc/ppp/options, in spite of having: # TAG: option # Specifies the location of the PPP options file. # By default PPP looks in '/etc/ppp/options' # option /etc/ppp/options.pptpd in the pptpd.conf file. I've tried symlinking an "options" to the "options.pptpd" file, but then it indicates that the ppp options, as suggested in the poptop distribution, are illegal: refuse-pap illegal option It's almost as if user-land ppp was being called instead of pppd. Anyone any ideas as to how I can get a better handle on this? Thank you. Cheers, Rob Hurle ----------------------------------------------------- Rob Hurle Faculty of Asian Studies, ANU Home address and contacts: Tel: +61 2 6247 2397 PO Box 4013 Fax: +61 2 6247 2397 Ainslie Cell phone: 0417 293 603 Australia e-mail: rob@coombs.anu.edu.au ----------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 06:52:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF68A16A407 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:52:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koro@koro.bentala.co.id) Received: from smtp01.orion.net.id (smtp01.orion.net.id [203.84.155.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7351143C9D for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:50:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from koro@koro.bentala.co.id) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp01.orion.net.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC5723C26; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:59:03 +0700 (WIT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at orion.net.id Received: from smtp01.orion.net.id ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp01.orion.net.id [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1SgiKJjlGodF; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:59:03 +0700 (WIT) Received: from [192.168.2.231] (unknown [203.84.152.250]) by smtp01.orion.net.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809D423C0F; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:59:02 +0700 (WIT) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:51:09 +0700 (WIT) From: Abdullah Koro X-X-Sender: koro@pangrango.bentala.co.id To: Rob Hurle In-Reply-To: <20061211163203.P1311@freebsd.connect-a.com.au> Message-ID: <20061211134616.B9846@pangrango.bentala.co.id> References: <20061211163203.P1311@freebsd.connect-a.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Poptop - how to configure? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:52:13 -0000 On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Rob Hurle wrote: > Dec 11 12:21:28 mail pptpd[54768]: CTRL (PPPD Launcher): program binary = > /usr/local/sbin/pppd Hi Rob, can you make sure that you put the pppd program at that location? because you said that you already tried directly to /usr/sbin/pppd or may be you can copy it to /usr/local/sbin refer to my fedora 6 box, and it is indicate, after pptpd start, it usually trying to start pppd. and I think this will not much different with freebsd box version. here's the my log: Dec 9 16:58:26 molinux pptpd[10428]: CTRL: Client 80.126.72.103 control connection started Dec 9 16:58:27 molinux pptpd[10428]: CTRL: Starting call (launching pppd, opening GRE) Dec 9 16:58:27 molinux pppd[10432]: pppd 2.4.4 started by root, uid 0 Dec 9 16:58:27 molinux pppd[10432]: Using interface ppp0 Dec 9 16:58:27 molinux pppd[10432]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/pts/1 Dec 9 16:58:31 molinux pptpd[10428]: CTRL: Ignored a SET LINK INFO packet with real ACCMs! Dec 9 16:58:33 molinux pppd[10432]: MPPE 128-bit stateless compression enabled Dec 9 16:58:35 molinux pppd[10432]: local IP address 10.0.0.92 Dec 9 16:58:35 molinux pppd[10432]: remote IP address 10.0.0.201 regards, Koro > Dec 11 12:21:28 mail pptpd[54767]: CTRL: I wrote 32 bytes to the client. > Dec 11 12:21:28 mail pptpd[54767]: CTRL: Sent packet to client > Dec 11 12:21:28 mail pptpd[54767]: CTRL: Reaping child PPP[54768] > Dec 11 12:21:28 mail pptpd[54767]: CTRL: Exiting now > Dec 11 12:21:28 mail pptpd[54625]: MGR: Reaped child 54767 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 06:52:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F28E16A40F for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:52:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perikillo@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62D143CA4 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:51:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from perikillo@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so1817950nfc for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:52:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=BA4LjTU2BYtIJXN0ID16RjUhF47DrcoVMeSrx2NBrEoH94nVuaAGlHWJP/p2iZt4dRoWF9U0S08MFeLB0JdwCbuVLna9kvFKGU7Nvg0G+uAqp0tK2nDyQzWolfgwZZkFJsWMcEJGf5/FDLaZYS8t3GLAahTaozXQrH1dXF3jvEE= Received: by 10.82.110.14 with SMTP id i14mr267594buc.1165819968172; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:52:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.178.5 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:52:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <51d7a5160612102252p22d3877cw86e6d773a599d59@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:52:47 -0800 From: perikillo To: "FreeBSD Mailing List" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Cannot use my External DVD Writer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:52:50 -0000 Hi people. I still cannot use my external writer Sony DRX-820U, went some GUI aplicaction wants to do something my console start to cry: umass0: Unsupported ATAPI command 0x46 umass0: Unsupported ATAPI command 0x46 umass0: Unsupported ATAPI command 0x46 umass0: Unsupported ATAPI command 0x46 umass0: Unsupported ATAPI command 0x46 umass0: Unsupported ATAPI command 0x46 umass0: Unsupported ATAPI command 0x46 umass0: Unsupported ATAPI command 0xb9 I have my device created /dev/cd0, pass0, etc. If i test dvd+rw-mediainfo /dev/cd1 bsblaptop# dvd+rw-mediainfo /dev/cd1 INQUIRY: [SONY ][DVD RW DRU-820A ][2.0c] :-( unable to GET CONFIGURATION: Input/output error Input/output error Some one knows whats is the meaning of this message? Is the device very newt for FreeBSD 6.1? I had read the handbook and enable everything i need to handle external device, i can work with external HD, Digital Cameras, Ipod's, but i cannot work with this device. Thanks all for your time. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 06:58:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526F316A407 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:58:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: from mail5.ukrtel.net (mail5.ukrtel.net [195.5.6.49]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD85C43CAB for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:56:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: from 57-56-124-91.pool.ukrtel.net ([91.124.56.57] helo=host.my.domain) by mail5.ukrtel.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gtf52-0002hi-NA for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:56:05 +0200 Received: from host.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host.my.domain (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBB6vv0I001185 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:57:57 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: (from elisej@localhost) by host.my.domain (8.13.7/8.13.6/Submit) id kBB6vvlW001184 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:57:57 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:57:57 +0200 From: a@zeos.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061211065757.GA1152@host.my.domain> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) Subject: What can I use to study Ethernet frames? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:58:06 -0000 Which program can I use to study Ethernet frames? Elisej Babenko From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 07:03:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7242516A47E for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:03:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from burk@sumail.ru) Received: from mxob.su29.ru (mxob.su29.ru [81.200.9.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B41B43CCF for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:01:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from burk@sumail.ru) Received: from [10.10.9.49] (helo=[192.168.1.17]) by mail.su29.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GtfB7-0005JP-PB for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:02:21 +0300 Message-ID: <457D027A.102@sumail.ru> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:02:18 +0300 From: g User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20061211065757.GA1152@host.my.domain> In-Reply-To: <20061211065757.GA1152@host.my.domain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Original-SMTP-From: burk@sumail.ru X-Original-SMTP-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What can I use to study Ethernet frames? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:03:00 -0000 a@zeos.net wrote: > Which program can I use to study Ethernet frames? > > Elisej Babenko > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > Try wireshark it is in the ports, it used to be ethereal cheers From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 07:12:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262CC16A403 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:12:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rob@coombs.anu.edu.au) Received: from canyonero.dot.net.au (canyonero.dot.net.au [202.147.68.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5DB43EBE for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:07:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rob@coombs.anu.edu.au) Received: from [203.129.41.189] (helo=freebsd.connect-a.com.au) by canyonero.dot.net.au with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1GtfHH-0003Cp-00; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:08:43 +1100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebsd.connect-a.com.au (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBB78a2J007778; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:08:36 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from rob@coombs.anu.edu.au) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:08:36 +1100 (EST) From: Rob Hurle X-X-Sender: rob@freebsd.connect-a.com.au To: Abdullah Koro In-Reply-To: <20061211134616.B9846@pangrango.bentala.co.id> Message-ID: <20061211180505.Y1311@freebsd.connect-a.com.au> References: <20061211163203.P1311@freebsd.connect-a.com.au> <20061211134616.B9846@pangrango.bentala.co.id> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL autolearn=failed version=3.1.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on freebsd.connect-a.com.au Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Poptop - how to configure? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:12:32 -0000 Hi Abdullah, Thanks for that information: > can you make sure that you put the pppd program at that location? > because you said that you already tried directly to /usr/sbin/pppd > or may be you can copy it to /usr/local/sbin On FreeBSD, the pppd that comes with the system is installed in /usr/sbin/pppd, and I tried that with the same result. There is another optional pppd in the ports (/usr/ports/net/pppd23) and that one installs in /usr/local/sbin/pppd. So I have tried them both, with identical results. Thanks for the info about the Fedora box. I'll look at that carefully and compare with mine. Cheers, Rob Hurle ----------------------------------------------------- Rob Hurle Faculty of Asian Studies, ANU Home address and contacts: Tel: +61 2 6247 2397 PO Box 4013 Fax: +61 2 6247 2397 Ainslie Cell phone: 0417 293 603 Australia e-mail: rob@coombs.anu.edu.au ----------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 07:19:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E2916A403 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:19:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F37843CA9 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:17:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBB7IQBD062805; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:18:26 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk from=m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk; sender-id=permerror; spf=permerror X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk kBB7IQBD062805 Message-ID: <457D063B.2040705@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:18:19 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: listvj References: <457CDE4B.2050103@summerhost.net> In-Reply-To: <457CDE4B.2050103@summerhost.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig4AEC8BE916C54B83061E1AA5" X-Greylist: Sender is SPF-compliant, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:18:37 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.6/2314/Sun Dec 10 20:02:13 2006 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_POLICY_TESTING,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:19:04 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig4AEC8BE916C54B83061E1AA5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable listvj wrote: > I'm interested in upgrading from 4.11 to 5.x. I currently track 4.x > stable using cvsup, but I've never done a major version upgrade. >=20 > First, should I bother? My hardware has dual pentium 1.13 processors > with 1G ram (I'm considering maxing it out at 4). I host email and web= > sites for a few domains on this machine and I have four jails configure= d > on it which will have to be upgraded too. I have users counting > particularly on mail service not being down for too long. >=20 > Other than the obvious advice to start with a good backup, can anyone > tell me: >=20 > 1) Will I gain a major benefit from upgrading > 2) Where should I look for instructions / advice on upgrading > 3) Also any general advice from personal experience. > 4) Just how risky is this? Uh -- why upgrade to a branch (5.x) that has already had it's last release and is worse performing than both 4.x and 6.x? You should really be looking at upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE just as soon as it comes out (Real Soon Now). As for risk -- for various reasons you will be better off doing a clean install of 6.x and rebuilding your server from the ground up. It's no more risky than installing any other server -- unless you have some legacy binary-only application that you absolutely have to run, it is virtually certain to succeed. You biggest problem would seem to be the downtime required to do the update -- if you can manage it, probably the least consumer impact method is building the upgraded system on fresh disks on a scratch box, and then finishing the upgrade by a disk-swap. Which also has the added benefit that you have a ready-made back out path. Cheers, Matthew=20 --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig4AEC8BE916C54B83061E1AA5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFfQZC8Mjk52CukIwRCDuoAJ0d0Wbwadw32wSv0iIdhJVOhOw5MACbByGd 6CZBLrdzo8VZCjEp7YvGHiI= =3Jdv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig4AEC8BE916C54B83061E1AA5-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 07:45:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 321E716A403 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:45:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: from smtp5.wlink.com.np (smtp5.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 45D6F43C9D for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:44:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: (qmail 21701 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2006 07:40:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp1.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.76) by 0 with SMTP; 11 Dec 2006 07:40:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 92398 invoked by uid 98); 11 Dec 2006 07:45:11 -0000 Received: from 202.79.36.216 by smtp1.wlink.com.np (envelope-from , uid 1009) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.88.4/2205. Clear:RC:1(202.79.36.216):. Processed in 0.029084 secs); 11 Dec 2006 07:45:11 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: teklimbu@wlink.com.np via smtp1.wlink.com.np X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(202.79.36.216):. Processed in 0.029084 secs) Received: from [202.79.36.216] (HELO teklimbu.wlink.com.np) by smtp1.wlink.com.np (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 11 Dec 2006 07:45:08 -0000 (Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:30:08 +0545) Received: (qmail 58955 invoked by uid 1009); 11 Dec 2006 07:55:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO teklimbu.wlink.com.np) (202.79.36.216) by teklimbu.wlink.com.np with SMTP; 11 Dec 2006 07:55:30 -0000 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:40:29 +0545 From: Tek Bahadur Limbu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20061211134029.d9a753ff.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> Organization: Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.0 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Check-By: smtp1.wlink.com.np Spam: No ; 0.8 / 5.0 X-Spam-Status-WL: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 Subject: Mbuf issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:45:21 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear All, One of my FreeBSD 6.0 (AMD64) which is running squid shows high values for mbufs. I am new to FreeBSD, so I need your help and guidance. Below is my netstat -m listing: netstat -m 7701/3489/11190 mbufs in use (current/cache/total) 7614/1256/8870/64768 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 0/0/0 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max) 17153K/3384K/20537K bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total) 0 requests for sfbufs denied 0 requests for sfbufs delayed 0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile 10120 calls to protocol drain routines Sometimes, the mbufs value exceeds 64000 when the squid proxy is busy and the server looses network connectivity. Is it possible to control the mbufs in use. My other FreeBSD squid proxy servers mbufs never exceed more than 32000. Please shed some light on this issue. Also please provide me some links to articles or tutorials on FreeBSD mbufs issues. - -- With best regards and good wishes, Yours sincerely, Tek Bahadur Limbu (TAG/TDG Group) Jwl Systems Department Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. Jawalakhel, Nepal -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFfQ7xVrOl+eVhOvYRAiziAJ9ssp4173sBXqhD+tZkBvwZn9gtQACePesD 2Z+hQmCWYdS5tynIJh90k/w= =wH7s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 08:48:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1612016A412 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:48:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com) Received: from mail.extracktor.com (www.nexlabs.com [210.193.32.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228AF43CAD for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:46:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com) Received: (qmail 86171 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2006 08:45:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (jhfoo@nexlabs.com@222.165.92.33) by www.nexlabs.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2006 08:45:14 -0000 Message-ID: <457D1B24.8060109@extracktor.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:47:32 +0800 From: Foo JH User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200612100905.30430.kirk@strauser.com> <20061210155022.GA28750@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <457C4156.8010309@computer.org> <200612110100.26229.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> <20061211054125.GB681@pubbox.net> In-Reply-To: <20061211054125.GB681@pubbox.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Setting up RAID-1 on 2 unequal disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:48:09 -0000 Hi all, I unfortunately have 2 uneuqally sized SATA disks to set up a mirrored shared folder: 80GB and 120GB. On the 120GB I plan to set up this way: /temp 2GB (double the system memory) /shared 80GB / 38GB I plan to mirror /shared onto the 80GB. It won't be bootable, but I can always mount it onto another FreeBSD machine. I've read some articles on mirroring on non-equal disks, notably: http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/mirror/ My question is: is there an easier way to do this? The example looks quiet daunting for a noobie FreeBSD admin like me. Appreciate any feedback on this. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 09:55:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B1A16A403 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:55:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stom@free.fr) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (smtp5-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6E943CCF for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:53:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stom@free.fr) Received: from imp2-g19.free.fr (imp2-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.2]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987A927962; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:54:47 +0100 (CET) Received: by imp2-g19.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id 251B5ADD0; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:54:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxy1.sncf.fr (proxy1.sncf.fr [171.16.4.3]) by imp2-g19.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:54:46 +0100 Message-ID: <1165830886.457d2ae6f0e6b@imp2-g19.free.fr> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:54:46 +0100 From: stom@free.fr To: Rob Hurle References: <20061211163203.P1311@freebsd.connect-a.com.au> <20061211134616.B9846@pangrango.bentala.co.id> <20061211180505.Y1311@freebsd.connect-a.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20061211180505.Y1311@freebsd.connect-a.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 171.16.4.3 Cc: Abdullah Koro , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Poptop - how to configure? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:55:32 -0000 Dear "poptop" users - Selon Rob Hurle : > Hi Abdullah, > > Thanks for that information: > > > can you make sure that you put the pppd program at that location? > > because you said that you already tried directly to /usr/sbin/pppd > > or may be you can copy it to /usr/local/sbin > > On FreeBSD, the pppd that comes with the system is installed in > /usr/sbin/pppd, and I tried that with the same result. There is > another optional pppd in the ports (/usr/ports/net/pppd23) and that > one installs in /usr/local/sbin/pppd. So I have tried them both, with > identical results. Thanks for the info about the Fedora box. I'll > look at that carefully and compare with mine. Note that both of your Kernel AND PPPD needs to support the MPPE encryption and optionnaly the MPPC compression. There should be an option to activate in your FreeBSD Kernel to support it - for PPPD I guess that the option is also available by using the port (with some compile option). (Why do not you migrate to the wonderful world of OpenVPN ? ;)) > > Cheers, > > Rob Hurle > ----------------------------------------------------- > Rob Hurle Faculty of Asian Studies, ANU > Home address and contacts: Tel: +61 2 6247 2397 > PO Box 4013 Fax: +61 2 6247 2397 > Ainslie Cell phone: 0417 293 603 > Australia e-mail: rob@coombs.anu.edu.au > ----------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Kind Regards ;) Philippe Laquet. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 10:32:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD9716A4D1 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:32:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lveax.m@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.235]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A6F43F57 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:26:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lveax.m@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so1416271wxc for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:27:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LEuIwNTKyjiLf7jYtK3nug6JBXLQcu7ivuLqQ4QXQRRoPeEXJEmGA2jPwDGufOCd7pqWRKAHQ1jmnBTQdq8FmOhKBt46jdd0Enc1tgHugktFEjtopUFrM50AC62uq86+JbfjRodwx5QIXjToAaNt3QNFAegXbTu5ws9sLPpGXjw= Received: by 10.90.88.13 with SMTP id l13mr6463087agb.1165832863335; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:27:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.90.1 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:27:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <576dcbc20612110227gdb2ddb2x9f26cb15923d7e06@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:27:43 +0000 From: lveax To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20061106151007.GD23884@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <454E9F7B.5010105@outstep.com> <454EB6D6.3030807@infowest.com> <454EBEEC.1060002@u.washington.edu> <454F210C.9000602@outstep.com> <20061106151007.GD23884@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> Cc: Lonnie Cumberland Subject: Re: MAC OS X connection to FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:32:20 -0000 On 11/6/06, David Kelly wrote: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 06:48:28AM -0500, Lonnie Cumberland wrote: > > Thanks everyone for the replay to my post as it did finally occur to > > me that perhaps this question had been asked on the mailing list, but > > unfortunately it occurred to me after I sent it. > > > > So, basically the Apple team took FreeBSD and the CM micro-kernel, > > combined them, made some improvements and added some additional code > > and then used it all as the MAC OS X core (without the GUI of course)? > > Yes, basically. FreeBSD is free for the taking, so Apple took. Steve > Jobs' NeXT team had a lot of familiarity with Mach, so they took from > there also too. A good number of well known FreeBSD people now work for > Apple, there are a number of FreeBSD device drivers shipping with MacOS > X. On a lark I put an Intel Etherexpress Pro 10/100B in my G4 Mac and > everything simply magically worked. No driver install, nothing. > who are the people that works in apple and also a freebsd developer now? > > With this being said, then does anyone have any experience with the > > stability and performance? > > Millions of MacOS X users. > > > My guess is that if it is really based upon FreeBSD then the > > performance should be pretty good from my readings about FreeBSD > > compared to other operating systems. > > Having both I'd say not. FreeBSD performs better at most server-oriented > tasks than the non-server tuned MacOS X. Have not used MacOS X Server. > Am not familiar with the tuning tweaks in plain old Darwin. Remember the > MacOS/Darwin kernel is greatly different from FreeBSD. Believe it was > McKusik who said to the effect, "The differnce between Linuxes is they > all have the same kernel, everything else is different. The difference > between BSDs is that they all have different kernels, everything else is > the same." Is not exactly true but contains a lot of truth. MacOS > X/Darwin is a recognized BSD variant. > > -- > David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net > ======================================================================== > Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 10:42:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D2216A4C2 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:42:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666AD43CA9 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:41:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBBAgRu5089647 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:42:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id kBBAgQYu089644 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:42:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:42:26 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061211114045.H89619@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Subject: no buffer space available PROBLEM X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:42:38 -0000 all possible values bumped higher, netstat -m shows big reserves but i still sometimes get this message. using nmap for whole subnet is quite likely to trigger this, but other programs too. ifconfig interface down and then up "fixes" the problem for some time. any idea? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 10:54:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE5016A403 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:54:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from ptb-relay03.plus.net (ptb-relay03.plus.net [212.159.14.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E52A43CF4 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:52:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from [81.174.174.115] (helo=CPC) by ptb-relay03.plus.net with smtp (Exim) id 1Gtimw-0005nR-6P for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:53:38 +0000 Message-ID: <002f01c71d12$9e5f96f0$1c07a8c0@CPC> From: "Graham Bentley" To: References: <20061210231123.2252A16A57F@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:53:37 -0000 Organization: Custom PC North West MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Subject: Re: Advantages of trimmed kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Graham Bentley List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:54:05 -0000 Wouldnt it be a usefull exercise on an old laptop with not much horsepower ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 11:01:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C22A16A68D for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:01:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9875C43E19 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:57:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBBAwKId089903; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:58:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id kBBAwK7A089900; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:58:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:58:20 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Graham Bentley In-Reply-To: <002f01c71d12$9e5f96f0$1c07a8c0@CPC> Message-ID: <20061211115812.Y89883@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20061210231123.2252A16A57F@hub.freebsd.org> <002f01c71d12$9e5f96f0$1c07a8c0@CPC> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Advantages of trimmed kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:01:32 -0000 > Wouldnt it be a usefull exercise on an old laptop > with not much horsepower ? it's always useful. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 11:20:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140BF16A4CE for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:20:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rob@coombs.anu.edu.au) Received: from canyonero.dot.net.au (canyonero.dot.net.au [202.147.68.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4BFB43E64 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:13:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rob@coombs.anu.edu.au) Received: from [203.129.41.189] (helo=freebsd.connect-a.com.au) by canyonero.dot.net.au with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Gtj7o-0007X7-00; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:15:12 +1100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebsd.connect-a.com.au (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBBBF5ee008541; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:15:05 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from rob@coombs.anu.edu.au) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:15:05 +1100 (EST) From: Rob Hurle X-X-Sender: rob@freebsd.connect-a.com.au To: stom@free.fr In-Reply-To: <1165830886.457d2ae6f0e6b@imp2-g19.free.fr> Message-ID: <20061211221100.F1311@freebsd.connect-a.com.au> References: <20061211163203.P1311@freebsd.connect-a.com.au> <20061211134616.B9846@pangrango.bentala.co.id> <20061211180505.Y1311@freebsd.connect-a.com.au> <1165830886.457d2ae6f0e6b@imp2-g19.free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL autolearn=failed version=3.1.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on freebsd.connect-a.com.au Cc: Abdullah Koro , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Poptop - how to configure? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:20:28 -0000 Hi Philippe, Thanks for your comment: > Note that both of your Kernel AND PPPD needs to support the MPPE > encryption and optionnaly the MPPC compression. There should be an > option to activate in your FreeBSD Kernel to support it - for PPPD I > guess that the option is also available by using the port (with some > compile option). Seems to be standard with FreeBSD. > (Why do not you migrate to the wonderful world of OpenVPN ? ;)) Ah, if only. Unfortunately I'm in a Dilbert situation. The previous system was pretty well trashed by my predecessor responding to pressure from The Big Man. I'm trying to pick up the pieces :-((( Cheers, Rob Hurle ----------------------------------------------------- Rob Hurle Faculty of Asian Studies, ANU Home address and contacts: Tel: +61 2 6247 2397 PO Box 4013 Fax: +61 2 6247 2397 Ainslie Cell phone: 0417 293 603 Australia e-mail: rob@coombs.anu.edu.au ----------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 13:36:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54AF16A40F for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:36:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D734143CA0 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:34:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:36:00 -0500 id 00056428.457D5EC0.00013B05 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:36:00 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: "=?UTF-8?Q?\"=E5=BC=A0=E9=9F=A1=E6=AD=A6\"?=" Message-Id: <20061211083600.8f0dae1b.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <1165811163.5474.14.camel@joe.realss.com> References: <1165811163.5474.14.camel@joe.realss.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: network analyse tool? To debug IMAP related problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:36:01 -0000 In response to "张韡武" : > Hello. I would wish to have a tool that would do this kind of thing: > > 1. listen on imap port on localhost, connect to localhost with my > email client; > 2. forward the traffic from/to/between real imap server; > 3. meanwhile, print everything being transfer-ed, so that I can > have a good ovewview of server-client conversation; > > I don't know what such kind of tool is usually called and thus difficult > to do an effective google search. I tried a few tools in ports/net but > none of them seems to be working in this way... (admit that I didn't > look into pkg-descr of every package) This may or may not help you, depending on what part of the IMAP conversation you're trying to debug, but programs like KMail and Sylpheed have excellent protocol debugging features built right in. There's basically a log window where you can watch the entire conversation occur. This doesn't help if you're trying to debug IMAP client problems, though. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 13:58:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6AC16A4B3 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:58:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00B043E64 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:51:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GtlaR-00060x-D6 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:52:55 -0500 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost.localnet.local [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kBBDtP4H082519 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:55:25 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id kBBDtOQe082518 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:55:24 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:55:24 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <457CDE4B.2050103@summerhost.net> <457D063B.2040705@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <457D063B.2040705@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612110755.24757.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec796f17fe1a7c816f68b8fe13b08d6d0530350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Re: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:58:28 -0000 On Monday 11 December 2006 01:18, Matthew Seaman wrote: > listvj wrote: > > I'm interested in upgrading from 4.11 to 5.x. I currently track 4.x > > stable using cvsup, but I've never done a major version upgrade. > > > > First, should I bother? My hardware has dual pentium 1.13 processors > > with 1G ram (I'm considering maxing it out at 4). I host email and web > > sites for a few domains on this machine and I have four jails configured > > on it which will have to be upgraded too. I have users counting > > particularly on mail service not being down for too long. > > > > Other than the obvious advice to start with a good backup, can anyone > > tell me: > > > > 1) Will I gain a major benefit from upgrading > > 2) Where should I look for instructions / advice on upgrading > > 3) Also any general advice from personal experience. > > 4) Just how risky is this? > > Uh -- why upgrade to a branch (5.x) that has already had it's last > release and is worse performing than both 4.x and 6.x? You should > really be looking at upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE just as soon as it > comes out (Real Soon Now). > > As for risk -- for various reasons you will be better off doing a > clean install of 6.x and rebuilding your server from the ground up. > It's no more risky than installing any other server -- unless you > have some legacy binary-only application that you absolutely have > to run, it is virtually certain to succeed. > > You biggest problem would seem to be the downtime required to do > the update -- if you can manage it, probably the least consumer > impact method is building the upgraded system on fresh disks on a > scratch box, and then finishing the upgrade by a disk-swap. Which > also has the added benefit that you have a ready-made back out > path. > > Cheers, > > Matthew Matthew, I agree with your advice to build the new server with a clean install, if only to prevent any sendmail issues. But I'm not so sure I understand your assessment that 5.x is "worse performing than both 4.x and 6.x." While I agree that 6.x is a great improvement in functionality over 5.x, I was not aware of the poor performance record of 5.x. Do you know of any links to benchmark tests, or other data, which would provide some more background on this? That kind of data would greatly influence my opinion in this discussion. Without it I'd be pleased to recommend 5.X, regardless of it's pending "drop dead" date, wrt support. I certainly see no need to chain myself to any software release cycle, nor, it seems, does the original poster. I'm in awe of his patience, and clearly he is satisfied with the product if he remains on 4.11. Thanks, lane ~Still running 5.x From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 14:03:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DFE16A4C2 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:03:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from wmptl.net (mail.wmptl.com [216.8.159.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2885443D88 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:54:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from [10.0.0.104] (r3140ca.wmptl.net [10.0.0.104]) by wmptl.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBBDtdGF098594; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:55:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Message-ID: <457D635C.9060901@wmptl.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:55:40 -0500 From: Nathan Vidican User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061027) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dick hoogendijk References: <1165691646.3362.4.camel@arwen> <6.0.0.22.2.20061209145320.024fed40@mail.computinginnovations.com> <1165698490.3362.15.camel@arwen> <457B556C.4000707@oss-solutions.com> <20061210094740.GA47520@lothlorien.nagual.nl> In-Reply-To: <20061210094740.GA47520@lothlorien.nagual.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 10.0.0.80 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X server remote login X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:03:20 -0000 dick hoogendijk wrote: > On 09 Dec Tony Shadwick wrote: > >> On the xserver, if you want it to happen automatically, you would put >> startx in your .login file. So if you wanted that flag passed, you >> would place startx -listen_tcp in your .login file. >> >> On the client side, you're running an x-client, I presume that gets >> started from /etc/rc.conf. There's probably something like >> xorg_enable="YES", and xorg_flags="blah", and you would put it in your >> xorg_flags statement. >> > > Xserver/Xclient side is still a bit confusing to me. > What happens is, when I logon to a solaris machine I get a login screen > on which I also can logon to remote machines graphicaly. I can even chose > from a list there, because these remote machines broadcast themselves? > All solaris machines are seen; my FreeBSD machines are not. The latter I > want changed, so I can chose to logon to a FreeBSD (remote) machine from > my solaris desktop machine. Hope this will clear things up a bit. > > As another user pointed out; what you're looking for is xdm. xdm is xorg's remote login screen, for lack of a better description; it's what will allow you to directly login to X from other stations, rather than via shell/startx. You might want to take a look at alternatives too - I use kdm, which is KDE's implementation of xdm, allowing you a little easier and a little more control over the login screen/appearence via KDE''s graphical configuration setup, but functionally the same as xdm. -- Nathan Vidican nvidican@wmptl.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 14:16:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDA816A4A7 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:16:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from wmptl.net (mail.wmptl.com [216.8.159.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A895D4416F for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:00:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from [10.0.0.104] (r3140ca.wmptl.net [10.0.0.104]) by wmptl.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBBE1kIF098832; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:01:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Message-ID: <457D64CB.7050203@wmptl.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:01:47 -0500 From: Nathan Vidican User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061027) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: perikillo , questions@freebsd.org References: <51d7a5160612101528j470f1db9v623c27213a410529@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <51d7a5160612101528j470f1db9v623c27213a410529@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 10.0.0.80 Cc: Subject: Re: VPN Solution for my current Situation. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:16:45 -0000 perikillo wrote: > Hi people. > > I want to know which is the best VPN solution i need to my current > situation: > > 2 Offices 1 Mexico-Tijuana 1 E.U.-Otay Mesa(both in the border). > > In E.U. Offices with have: > > DNS+Firewall+Proxy Linux > Mail Server Linux > Samba Linux > PBX Altigen Win NT > ERP DBA Linux > Backup FreeBSD. > > Mexico > PBX Same system > Samba > ERP DBA(This is the busies from both sites) > Backup FreeBSD > > 65 User 55 Mexico 10 E.U. > 40 user in Mexico have mail account && only 15 Internet access > all the users in E.U have mail account && Internet access. > > We share files, E.U. users access the ERP system in Mexico. > > If the users in Mexico need Internet, they have to reach the proxy in > E.U. > > Both PBX systems have communication for company internal calls, external > calls. > > All this communication of Voice and Data goes over one private link, but > next year our contract is going to finish, them we need to negotiate the > next contract. > > Another thing, is that we are planning to start the VoIP solution and > see is > we can remove our current PBX system with Asterisk. > > My questions es this: Supposed that we continue with the same Private > Line, > and we add another public line to do some VPN between both facilities > if one > link fail the other can continue(backup) or have both sharing the > workload, > with this workload which VPN solution is the best for my situation: > > IPsec, OpenVPN, etc? > > Speaking of FreeBSD, because there is where i want to deploy the VPN > solution in Mexico, in E.U. we have there Linux, this can be problematic? > > Hope you understand my layout && english, any advice is welcome, > thanks all > for your time!!! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > mpd for FreeBSD... it just works. -- Nathan Vidican nvidican@wmptl.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 14:17:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B585C16A50B; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:17:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C1C440E9; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:59:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1925046E74; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:00:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:00:48 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Vishal Patil In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20061211135321.F4227@fledge.watson.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Example network protocol implementation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:17:36 -0000 On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Vishal Patil wrote: > Could someone point me to an example that shows a SIMPLE network protocol > implemented over TCP/IP inside the FreeBSD kernel. I think I could look at > the NFS client driver but is there an example simpler than that. Also is > there a guide explaining how to go about developing TCP/IP based network > protocols for FreeBSD. Thanks Here are some consumers of sockets in the kernel: - NFS client, which creates and connects both UDP and TCP sockets, uses them for I/O, etc. - NFS server, which uses UDP and TCP sockets for I/O. Unlike the NFS client, it doesn't open the sockets in kernel, rather, it relies on a user process (nfsd) passing validated sockets into the kernel. - System V streams (dev/streams), which uses socket pairs to implement streams. Does creation and I/O. - fifofs, which implements POSIX fifos using a pair of UNIX domain sockets. Again, does creation and I/O. - portalfs, which implements the portal file system using sockets. - ng_ksocket, which provides a netgraph interface to sockets in the kernel. - netncp, which provides an NCP RPC interface over SPX/IPX for nwfs. - netsmb, which provides an SMB RPC interface over TCP/IP for smbfs. - rpclnt, which is used by the nfs4client, and is functionally similar to the NFS client RPC code for NFS2/NFS3 in nfsclient. - bootp_subr.c and krpc_subr.c, which are used by the NFS root code to set up NFS access during a diskless boot: they perform the bootp exchange to retrieve an IP address, and then the necessary RPC mount protocol to query a root file handle to set up the NFS client for the file system root. All of these examples have upsides and downsides, and vary in maturity. I'd probably start by looking at the NFS client and fifofs. One of the biggest questions you'll need to answer is what your event model is and how it will relate to any worker threads you may have. Many of the in-kernel socket consumers use socket upcalls to get direct notifications of socket events from within the network stack, allowing for fast socket draining and TCP acking. On the other hand, in the netisr/ithread context, you can't perform blocking memory allocation and disk I/O, so if that will be involved, you'll need worker threads in the style of the NFS server. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 14:42:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD1516A686 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:42:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@budostore.de) Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de (mo-p00-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.160]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0198644092 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:31:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from news@budostore.de) Received: from nor75-5-82-235-173-77.fbx.proxad.net (nor75-5-82-235-173-77.fbx.proxad.net [82.235.173.77]) by post.webmailer.de (klopstock mo13) (RZmta 3.8) with ESMTP id iBBDDvre06833A for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:32:36 +0100 (MET) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:32:36 +0100 (MET) From: Karl Sinn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612111525.05845.news@budostore.de> X-RZG-AUTH: ibDpgOm8RLcSc5zBxTj4 Subject: trying to install jre X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:42:15 -0000 Hi, I try to install jre. pkg_add -r jre does not find the file /usr/port/java/jre/make gives an error message like: shared library c.3 not found compat3x-i386-5... is forbidden What can I do? Thanks Karl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 15:20:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03BBA16A403 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:20:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.244]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBBDC43EDE for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:16:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so231594ana for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:16:47 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=RHS/9LBCkglfLBbWygdP2GyUgbJQVPwralXDssk5E5xRz1SJEjrn0VSoNBSsez7rExIWhQpPSLyZQVj+nAbAst/nGcHXreSfzwdxRFp07s7V+uHTrl8Irl9+fwCq7U19XuHvoz1FXcKIt23BGbMj6PQBALT15GNEhvvI+uvWVEw= Received: by 10.78.204.1 with SMTP id b1mr1422265hug.1165850206584; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:16:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.164.20 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:16:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:16:46 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: "Karl Sinn" In-Reply-To: <200612111525.05845.news@budostore.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200612111525.05845.news@budostore.de> X-Google-Sender-Auth: e4e3f73ab9b1cdcb Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: trying to install jre X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:20:40 -0000 On 12/11/06, Karl Sinn wrote: > Hi, > > I try to install jre. > > pkg_add -r jre > > does not find the file > > /usr/port/java/jre/make > > gives an error message like: > shared library c.3 not found > compat3x-i386-5... is forbidden > > > What can I do? Try this one: /usr/ports/java/diablo-jre15 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 15:22:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D458B16A47B for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:22:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9BB943EB2 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:19:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i28so706621wra for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:20:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.69.8 with SMTP id r8mr6857058aga.1165850425066; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:20:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 32sm6126198aga.2006.12.11.07.20.24; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:20:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E15FB92D; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:20:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (boss.seibercom.net [192.168.0.4]) (Authenticated sender: gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF50EB82C; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:20:22 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:20:29 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: User Questions Organization: Seibercom.NET In-Reply-To: <200612111525.05845.news@budostore.de> References: <200612111525.05845.news@budostore.de> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20061211101249.E054.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.29 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: Karl Sinn Subject: Re: trying to install jre X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: User Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:22:52 -0000 On Monday December 11, 2006 at 09:32:36 (AM) Karl Sinn wrote: > I try to install jre. > > pkg_add -r jre > > does not find the file > > /usr/port/java/jre/make > > gives an error message like: > shared library c.3 not found > compat3x-i386-5... is forbidden I am assuming the the path: /usr/port/java/jre/make is a typo. It appears that you are attempting to install from a package. Have you tried installing it via the ports? You also might want to try creating a more complete log file. Something along these lines might do. script -ak ~/jre.log pkg_add -rv jre -- Gerard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 15:23:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED5516A50B for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:23:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tshadwick@oss-solutions.com) Received: from moogle.hksilver.net (mail.hksilver.net [208.231.66.99]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F05A43DA1 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:21:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tshadwick@oss-solutions.com) Received: from [172.16.30.8] (chibi.shadwick.home [172.16.30.8]) (authenticated bits=0) by moogle.hksilver.net (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBBFMH6k076723 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:22:19 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tshadwick@oss-solutions.com) Message-ID: <457D779C.8040907@oss-solutions.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:22:04 -0600 From: Tony Shadwick User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5.0.2 (Macintosh/20060310) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Foo JH References: <200612100905.30430.kirk@strauser.com> <20061210155022.GA28750@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <457C4156.8010309@computer.org> <200612110100.26229.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> <20061211054125.GB681@pubbox.net> <457D1B24.8060109@extracktor.com> In-Reply-To: <457D1B24.8060109@extracktor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Setting up RAID-1 on 2 unequal disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:23:21 -0000 I'd say use gvinum. It's a bit tricky....actually, it's VERY tricky. You have to get the geometry of the shared volume precisely right on the 120GB drive to match the 80GB drive, then you can allocate the rest of the free space. Honestly, you *could* cheat here. :) I think.... Set up your 80GB drive. We'll call it /dev/ad0. Plug in your 120GB drive but don't do anything to it. We'll call it /dev/ad1. dd if=/dev/ad0 of=/dev/ad1 Now, set up gvinum as though they were of the exact same geometry, and get your mirror going. Then, go back and modify the drive label of ad1, and allocate the rest of the space on that disk. You'll want to have gotten the REAL drive geometry of /dev/ad1 ahead of time, because (if I recall...) you're going to have to change c: to the correct geometry, then add partitions using space above and beyond what you have on ad0. Does that make sense at all? Perhaps you should work through setting up a normal gvinum mirror before going this route... Foo JH wrote: > Hi all, > > I unfortunately have 2 uneuqally sized SATA disks to set up a mirrored > shared folder: 80GB and 120GB. On the 120GB I plan to set up this way: > > /temp 2GB (double the system memory) > /shared 80GB > / 38GB > > I plan to mirror /shared onto the 80GB. It won't be bootable, but I can > always mount it onto another FreeBSD machine. > > I've read some articles on mirroring on non-equal disks, notably: > http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/mirror/ > > My question is: is there an easier way to do this? The example looks > quiet daunting for a noobie FreeBSD admin like me. > > Appreciate any feedback on this. Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 15:25:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D8116A412 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:25:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stom@free.fr) Received: from smtp3-g19.free.fr (smtp3-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B1443C9D for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:23:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stom@free.fr) Received: from imp4-g19.free.fr (imp4-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.4]) by smtp3-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C91224A04E; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:24:36 +0100 (CET) Received: by imp4-g19.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id 8EF8AAFF7; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:24:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxy1.sncf.fr (proxy1.sncf.fr [171.16.4.3]) by imp4-g19.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:24:36 +0100 Message-ID: <1165850676.457d783471082@imp4-g19.free.fr> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:24:36 +0100 From: stom@free.fr To: Nathan Vidican References: <51d7a5160612101528j470f1db9v623c27213a410529@mail.gmail.com> <457D64CB.7050203@wmptl.com> In-Reply-To: <457D64CB.7050203@wmptl.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 171.16.4.3 Cc: perikillo , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VPN Solution for my current Situation. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:25:05 -0000 Hi Selon Nathan Vidican : > perikillo wrote: > > Hi people. > > > > I want to know which is the best VPN solution i need to my current > > situation: > > > > 2 Offices 1 Mexico-Tijuana 1 E.U.-Otay Mesa(both in the border). > > > > In E.U. Offices with have: > > > > DNS+Firewall+Proxy Linux > > Mail Server Linux > > Samba Linux > > PBX Altigen Win NT > > ERP DBA Linux > > Backup FreeBSD. > > > > Mexico > > PBX Same system > > Samba > > ERP DBA(This is the busies from both sites) > > Backup FreeBSD > > > > 65 User 55 Mexico 10 E.U. > > 40 user in Mexico have mail account && only 15 Internet access > > all the users in E.U have mail account && Internet access. > > > > We share files, E.U. users access the ERP system in Mexico. > > > > If the users in Mexico need Internet, they have to reach the proxy in > > E.U. > > > > Both PBX systems have communication for company internal calls, external > > calls. > > > > All this communication of Voice and Data goes over one private link, but > > next year our contract is going to finish, them we need to negotiate the > > next contract. > > > > Another thing, is that we are planning to start the VoIP solution and > > see is > > we can remove our current PBX system with Asterisk. > > > > My questions es this: Supposed that we continue with the same Private > > Line, > > and we add another public line to do some VPN between both facilities > > if one > > link fail the other can continue(backup) or have both sharing the > > workload, > > with this workload which VPN solution is the best for my situation: > > > > IPsec, OpenVPN, etc? > > > > Speaking of FreeBSD, because there is where i want to deploy the VPN > > solution in Mexico, in E.U. we have there Linux, this can be problematic? > > > > Hope you understand my layout && english, any advice is welcome, > > thanks all > > for your time!!! > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > mpd for FreeBSD... it just works. The choice is "up to you" - We also use OpenVPN for site-to-site VPN SSL tunnels and it is also a good and easy solution. Authentication is based on X509 certificates for cross-authentication - With OpenVPN's multiple and fine-grained options. We have good performance with strong encryption options. The protocol (UDP) encapsulation is also a nice feature. The Linux<->FreeBSD is not a problem at all. > > > -- > Nathan Vidican > nvidican@wmptl.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Philippe Laquet. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 15:28:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCBE16A403 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:28:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from listvj@summerhost.net) Received: from mail.summerhost.net (mail.summerhost.net [64.106.242.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1422F43DCF for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:25:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from listvj@summerhost.net) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (user-12hdp9n.cable.mindspring.com [69.22.229.55]) by mail.summerhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 284C3F4B31 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:26:02 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <457DBEDA.6040908@summerhost.net> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:26:02 -0500 From: listvj User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <457CDE4B.2050103@summerhost.net> <457D063B.2040705@infracaninophile.co.uk> <200612110755.24757.lane@joeandlane.com> In-Reply-To: <200612110755.24757.lane@joeandlane.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:28:05 -0000 Lane wrote: > On Monday 11 December 2006 01:18, Matthew Seaman wrote: > >> listvj wrote: >> >>> I'm interested in upgrading from 4.11 to 5.x. I currently track 4.x >>> stable using cvsup, but I've never done a major version upgrade. >>> >>> First, should I bother? My hardware has dual pentium 1.13 processors >>> with 1G ram (I'm considering maxing it out at 4). I host email and web >>> sites for a few domains on this machine and I have four jails configured >>> on it which will have to be upgraded too. I have users counting >>> particularly on mail service not being down for too long. >>> >>> Other than the obvious advice to start with a good backup, can anyone >>> tell me: >>> >>> 1) Will I gain a major benefit from upgrading >>> 2) Where should I look for instructions / advice on upgrading >>> 3) Also any general advice from personal experience. >>> 4) Just how risky is this? >>> >> Uh -- why upgrade to a branch (5.x) that has already had it's last >> release and is worse performing than both 4.x and 6.x? You should >> really be looking at upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE just as soon as it >> comes out (Real Soon Now). >> >> As for risk -- for various reasons you will be better off doing a >> clean install of 6.x and rebuilding your server from the ground up. >> It's no more risky than installing any other server -- unless you >> have some legacy binary-only application that you absolutely have >> to run, it is virtually certain to succeed. >> >> You biggest problem would seem to be the downtime required to do >> the update -- if you can manage it, probably the least consumer >> impact method is building the upgraded system on fresh disks on a >> scratch box, and then finishing the upgrade by a disk-swap. Which >> also has the added benefit that you have a ready-made back out >> path. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Matthew >> > Matthew, > > I agree with your advice to build the new server with a clean install, if only > to prevent any sendmail issues. > > But I'm not so sure I understand your assessment that 5.x is "worse performing > than both 4.x and 6.x." While I agree that 6.x is a great improvement in > functionality over 5.x, I was not aware of the poor performance record of > 5.x. > > Do you know of any links to benchmark tests, or other data, which would > provide some more background on this? > > That kind of data would greatly influence my opinion in this discussion. > Without it I'd be pleased to recommend 5.X, regardless of it's pending "drop > dead" date, wrt support. I certainly see no need to chain myself to any > software release cycle, nor, it seems, does the original poster. I'm in awe > of his patience, and clearly he is satisfied with the product if he remains > on 4.11. > > Thanks, > > lane > ~Still running 5.x > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I'm on 4.11 because I'm lazy and chicken. The server is co-located so it isn't real convenient to do major upgrades. It might actually be easier and more cost effective (in terms of my time) to get a replacement box, set up 6.0 on it, and migrate. Btw, I'm sorry for posting this question twice. I posted the first one with the wrong email address. I was surprised (and disappointed) to see that the list accepted it as I did not subscribe to the list with that address. :( From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 15:42:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C872C16A415 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:42:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhongtao@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn) Received: from mail.tsinghua.edu.cn (mail.tsinghua.edu.cn [166.111.8.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20B0043C9E for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:40:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zhongtao@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn) Received: from zhongtao.tsinghua.edu.cn.zhongtao@tsinghua.edu.cn([166.111.249.119]) by mail.tsinghua.edu.cn(AIMC 3.2.0.0) with SMTP id jm4457db158; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:41:10 +0800 X-MaxRuleNumber-200: 79457 54944965 X-MatchRuleNumber-200: 3670 26423171 X-Action-200: D Received: from zhongtao.tsinghua.edu.cn.zhongtao@tsinghua.edu.cn([166.111.249.119]) by mail.tsinghua.edu.cn(AIMC 3.2.0.0) with SMTP id AISP action; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:41:10 +0800 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Zhongtao Zhu Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:41:12 +0800 Message-ID: <86r6v6fnjb.fsf@tsinghua.edu.cn> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-AIMC-AUTH: zhongtao:mail X-AIMC-MAILFROM: zhongtao@tsinghua.edu.cn X-AIMC-Msg-ID: uKMRntQB Subject: Is it safe to `make buildworld' while using ccache? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:42:39 -0000 Dear list, I just got the 6.1-release stable src-tree merrily cvsup-ed, but it's weird the job of `make buildworld' stopped with some "missing error" related to the 'kvm'. (Forgive me, I can only offer this brief right now.) I've settled this problem with disabling the 'ccache' by purging its configuration lines from '/etc/make.conf' and afterwards everything is fixed. I wonder if somebody else also encountered with this frustrated combination. Regards, -- Zhongtao Zhu Tel: 86 10 62796829 Department of Computer Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 15:48:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E3B916A492 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:48:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from heli@mikestammer.com) Received: from smtp111.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp111.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 173FA43EC3 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:45:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from heli@mikestammer.com) Received: (qmail 55853 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2006 15:46:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.mikestammer.com) (mikestammer@sbcglobal.net@70.142.211.17 with login) by smtp111.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2006 15:46:51 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: _pM.byoVM1nBQtJpuCyZutQ.5lcaLzh7eTaDIPU1HdIDgONml4uUVXq3ZgZQIB8Zh_HYKsYRjcW53A6BotpiY6GWO6dV3IfAG3JT2vGFvR7GwEJdOgeqTKSqQyz.f2jm Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mikestammer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502351146B; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:46:51 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mikestammer.com Received: from mail.mikestammer.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gondolin.middleearth.mikestammer.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yb1QAz53K8xt; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:46:48 -0600 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: eric) by mail.mikestammer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A6951141B; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:46:48 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <457D7D66.8090407@mikestammer.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:46:46 -0600 From: Eric User-Agent: Thunderbird 3.0a1 (Windows/20061208) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zhongtao Zhu References: <86r6v6fnjb.fsf@tsinghua.edu.cn> In-Reply-To: <86r6v6fnjb.fsf@tsinghua.edu.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it safe to `make buildworld' while using ccache? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:48:42 -0000 Zhongtao Zhu wrote: > Dear list, > > I just got the 6.1-release stable src-tree merrily cvsup-ed, but it's > weird the job of `make buildworld' stopped with some "missing error" > related to the 'kvm'. (Forgive me, I can only offer this brief right > now.) > > I've settled this problem with disabling the 'ccache' by purging its > configuration lines from '/etc/make.conf' and afterwards everything is > fixed. I wonder if somebody else also encountered with this frustrated > combination. > > Regards, > ccache has worked for me wonderfully on 3+ machines doing everything: ports, buildworld, kernels, etc. No issues at all does the ccache stuff show up first in your path statement? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 15:54:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B28A16A40F for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:54:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aarredon@cs.nmsu.edu) Received: from mail.cs.nmsu.edu (mail.cs.nmsu.edu [128.123.64.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D603343CD7 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:52:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aarredon@cs.nmsu.edu) Received: from intranet.cs.nmsu.edu (intranet [128.123.64.22]) by mail.cs.nmsu.edu (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id kBBFs6is004332; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:54:06 -0700 (MST) Received: from intranet.cs.nmsu.edu (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by intranet.cs.nmsu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id kBBFs6Ho008401; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:54:06 -0700 (MST) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by intranet.cs.nmsu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id kBBFs6HD008400; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:54:06 -0700 (MST) X-Authentication-Warning: intranet.cs.nmsu.edu: nobody set sender to aarredon@cs.nmsu.edu using -f Received: from 71.210.233.122 (SquirrelMail authenticated user aarredon) by intranet.cs.nmsu.edu with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:54:06 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <64145.71.210.233.122.1165852446.squirrel@intranet.cs.nmsu.edu> In-Reply-To: <457D635C.9060901@wmptl.com> References: <1165691646.3362.4.camel@arwen> <6.0.0.22.2.20061209145320.024fed40@mail.computinginnovations.com> <1165698490.3362.15.camel@arwen> <457B556C.4000707@oss-solutions.com> <20061210094740.GA47520@lothlorien.nagual.nl> <457D635C.9060901@wmptl.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:54:06 -0700 (MST) From: "Antonio Arredondo" To: "Nathan Vidican" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X server remote login X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:54:25 -0000 > dick hoogendijk wrote: >> On 09 Dec Tony Shadwick wrote: >> >>> On the xserver, if you want it to happen automatically, you would put >>> startx in your .login file. So if you wanted that flag passed, you >>> would place startx -listen_tcp in your .login file. >>> >>> On the client side, you're running an x-client, I presume that gets >>> started from /etc/rc.conf. There's probably something like >>> xorg_enable="YES", and xorg_flags="blah", and you would put it in your >>> xorg_flags statement. >>> >> >> Xserver/Xclient side is still a bit confusing to me. >> What happens is, when I logon to a solaris machine I get a login screen >> on which I also can logon to remote machines graphicaly. I can even >> chose >> from a list there, because these remote machines broadcast themselves? >> All solaris machines are seen; my FreeBSD machines are not. The latter I >> want changed, so I can chose to logon to a FreeBSD (remote) machine from >> my solaris desktop machine. Hope this will clear things up a bit. >> >> > As another user pointed out; what you're looking for is xdm. xdm is > xorg's remote login screen, for lack of a better description; it's what > will allow you to directly login to X from other stations, rather than > via shell/startx. You might want to take a look at alternatives too - I > use kdm, which is KDE's implementation of xdm, allowing you a little > easier and a little more control over the login screen/appearence via > KDE''s graphical configuration setup, but functionally the same as xdm. > > > -- > Nathan Vidican > nvidican@wmptl.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Not sure if this issue has been resolved, but I found that the 'Xstartup' file is missing from the xorg install of xdm ( /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm ). I found I needed this file to get xdm to properly login. If not, xdm will not allow remote connection to connect. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 16:05:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6FD16A416 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:05:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhongtao@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn) Received: from mail.tsinghua.edu.cn (mail.tsinghua.edu.cn [166.111.8.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F34B443CD9 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:03:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zhongtao@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn) Received: from zhongtao.tsinghua.edu.cn.zhongtao@tsinghua.edu.cn([166.111.249.119]) by mail.tsinghua.edu.cn(AIMC 3.2.0.0) with SMTP id jm2c457d9a07; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:04:41 +0800 X-MaxRuleNumber-200: 79512 13285 X-MatchRuleNumber-200: 3670 6571 X-Action-200: D Received: from zhongtao.tsinghua.edu.cn.zhongtao@tsinghua.edu.cn([166.111.249.119]) by mail.tsinghua.edu.cn(AIMC 3.2.0.0) with SMTP id AISP action; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:04:41 +0800 To: Eric References: <86r6v6fnjb.fsf@tsinghua.edu.cn> <457D7D66.8090407@mikestammer.com> From: Zhongtao Zhu Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:04:39 +0800 In-Reply-To: <457D7D66.8090407@mikestammer.com> (Eric's message of "Mon\, 11 Dec 2006 09\:46\:46 -0600") Message-ID: <86k60yfmg8.fsf@tsinghua.edu.cn> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-AIMC-AUTH: zhongtao:mail X-AIMC-MAILFROM: zhongtao@tsinghua.edu.cn X-AIMC-Msg-ID: slxdntQB Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it safe to `make buildworld' while using ccache? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:05:06 -0000 On Mon 11 Dec 2006 23:46, Eric writes: > Zhongtao Zhu wrote: >> Dear list, >> >> I just got the 6.1-release stable src-tree merrily cvsup-ed, but it's >> weird the job of `make buildworld' stopped with some "missing error" >> related to the 'kvm'. (Forgive me, I can only offer this brief right >> now.) >> >> I've settled this problem with disabling the 'ccache' by purging its >> configuration lines from '/etc/make.conf' and afterwards everything is >> fixed. I wonder if somebody else also encountered with this frustrated >> combination. > ccache has worked for me wonderfully on 3+ machines doing everything: > ports, buildworld, kernels, etc. No issues at all > > does the ccache stuff show up first in your path statement? Nope! By wild guess did I point to 'ccache' and anyway the problem was solved, though. I also use the phenomenal 'ccache' all the time except this one. It's probably the 'ccache' isn't the scapegoat, maybe there's some other unsuitable setup in my system. I don't know whether or not I'm able to get it located. Thank you, Eric. Regards, -- Zhongtao Zhu Tel: 86 10 62796829 Department of Computer Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 16:14:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F5F816A417 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:14:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from heli@mikestammer.com) Received: from smtp101.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp101.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.104]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07C4243CA9 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:13:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from heli@mikestammer.com) Received: (qmail 33976 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2006 16:14:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.mikestammer.com) (mikestammer@sbcglobal.net@70.142.211.17 with login) by smtp101.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2006 16:14:21 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: 5sdv4nIVM1npo4Jb8lvXWdH85pytXv3YD6LKQ5r7SAfc2ivhH5KKkyTor0djjJ8GWziLRx4YMpp9bRDMd_A9AIIPyY0CGra69vC1gExqhJMvefI.OJeaWsj5HeKrmU83pE8crJRSs0.pxq8- Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mikestammer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE0A1146B; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:14:20 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mikestammer.com Received: from mail.mikestammer.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gondolin.middleearth.mikestammer.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FNjzWSOKKIAO; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:14:19 -0600 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: eric) by mail.mikestammer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21791141B; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:14:18 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <457D83D9.1010802@mikestammer.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:14:17 -0600 From: Eric User-Agent: Thunderbird 3.0a1 (Windows/20061208) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zhongtao Zhu References: <86r6v6fnjb.fsf@tsinghua.edu.cn> <457D7D66.8090407@mikestammer.com> <86k60yfmg8.fsf@tsinghua.edu.cn> In-Reply-To: <86k60yfmg8.fsf@tsinghua.edu.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it safe to `make buildworld' while using ccache? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:14:23 -0000 Zhongtao Zhu wrote: > On Mon 11 Dec 2006 23:46, Eric writes: > > >> ccache has worked for me wonderfully on 3+ machines doing everything: >> ports, buildworld, kernels, etc. No issues at all >> >> does the ccache stuff show up first in your path statement? >> > > Nope! By wild guess did I point to 'ccache' and anyway the problem was > solved, though. I also use the phenomenal 'ccache' all the time except > this one. It's probably the 'ccache' isn't the scapegoat, maybe > there's some other unsuitable setup in my system. I don't know whether > or not I'm able to get it located. > > Thank you, Eric. > > Regards, > check out the post install instructions for ccache and verify on your system. once you do that, it should work without issue. the ccache stuff has to be listed first in your path for it to work properly as far as i know. Good luck! Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 17:35:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E25C16A403 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:35:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@budostore.de) Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de (mo-p00-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0800243CCD for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:34:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from news@budostore.de) Received: from nor75-5-82-235-173-77.fbx.proxad.net (nor75-5-82-235-173-77.fbx.proxad.net [82.235.173.77]) by post.webmailer.de (klopstock mo47) (RZmta 3.8) with ESMTP id iBBGtCNn03718H for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:35:21 +0100 (MET) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:35:21 +0100 (MET) From: Karl Sinn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200612111525.05845.news@budostore.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612111827.54061.news@budostore.de> X-RZG-AUTH: ibDpgOm8RLcSc5zBxTj4 Subject: Re: trying to install jre X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:35:24 -0000 Hi, Am Montag, 11. Dezember 2006 16:16 schrieb Andrew Pantyukhin: > Try this one: > /usr/ports/java/diablo-jre15 In the ports collection is only diablo-jre13 which does not install. Error message like: diablo-jre-1.3.1.0_2 is forbidden. Vulnerabilities in the browser plugin What now? Karl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 17:36:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD5816A417 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:36:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout4.cac.washington.edu (mxout4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F203043CAA for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:34:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by mxout4.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBBHZtZC025705 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:35:56 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBBHZt8a025600 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:35:55 -0800 Message-ID: <457D96FA.9040700@u.washington.edu> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:35:54 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <454E9F7B.5010105@outstep.com> <454EB6D6.3030807@infowest.com> <454EBEEC.1060002@u.washington.edu> <454F210C.9000602@outstep.com> <20061106151007.GD23884@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> <576dcbc20612110227gdb2ddb2x9f26cb15923d7e06@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <576dcbc20612110227gdb2ddb2x9f26cb15923d7e06@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2006.12.11.92432 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: MAC OS X connection to FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:36:34 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 lveax wrote: > On 11/6/06, David Kelly wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 06:48:28AM -0500, Lonnie Cumberland wrote: >> > Thanks everyone for the replay to my post as it did finally occur to >> > me that perhaps this question had been asked on the mailing list, but >> > unfortunately it occurred to me after I sent it. >> > >> > So, basically the Apple team took FreeBSD and the CM micro-kernel, >> > combined them, made some improvements and added some additional code >> > and then used it all as the MAC OS X core (without the GUI of course)? >> >> Yes, basically. FreeBSD is free for the taking, so Apple took. Steve >> Jobs' NeXT team had a lot of familiarity with Mach, so they took from >> there also too. A good number of well known FreeBSD people now work for >> Apple, there are a number of FreeBSD device drivers shipping with MacOS >> X. On a lark I put an Intel Etherexpress Pro 10/100B in my G4 Mac and >> everything simply magically worked. No driver install, nothing. >> > > > who are the people that works in apple and also a freebsd developer now? There are quite a few, actually, that work for Apple and work on the FreeBSD project, and vice versa. The other day I was doing some random websurfing and came across an individual who did a significant amount of work porting over applications to Darwin for the Apple folks. This is just one of many devs who works for apple now and contributes back to the open-source community (note his accomplishments): - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFfZb66CkrZkzMC68RAjAFAJ0ZByg0YvSjL/COBGJ4CZu5h0x+9ACbBoUu XZfVwy2BY7LcT4+5S+Qc6cY= =96BD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 17:46:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0191A16A403 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:46:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@budostore.de) Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de (mo-p00-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A767843E68 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:38:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from news@budostore.de) Received: from nor75-5-82-235-173-77.fbx.proxad.net (nor75-5-82-235-173-77.fbx.proxad.net [82.235.173.77]) by post.webmailer.de (klopstock mo31) (RZmta 3.8) with ESMTP id iBBGwjfQ0055fA for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:38:56 +0100 (MET) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:38:56 +0100 (MET) From: Karl Sinn To: User Questions User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200612111525.05845.news@budostore.de> <20061211101249.E054.GERARD@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20061211101249.E054.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612111831.29139.news@budostore.de> X-RZG-AUTH: ibDpgOm8RLcSc5zBxTj4 Subject: Re: trying to install jre X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:46:50 -0000 Hi, Am Montag, 11. Dezember 2006 16:20 schrieb Gerard Seibert: > I am assuming the the path: /usr/port/java/jre/make is a typo. :-) This was maybenot clear. Of course I was in the path /usr/port/java/jre/ trying to execute make.. > It appears that you are attempting to install from a package. Have you > tried installing it via the ports? Both does not work. > You also might want to try creating a more complete log file. Something > along these lines might do. > > script -ak ~/jre.log pkg_add -rv jre I would like to but it's on another computer, and I don't want to copy the whole message. Is there any special part of the error message that you need? Karl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 17:47:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4269A16A47B for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:47:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout7.cac.washington.edu (mxout7.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76B5D43DA7 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:37:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by mxout7.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBBHcobO026581 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:38:51 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBBHcoxZ026224 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:38:50 -0800 Message-ID: <457D97A9.7030003@u.washington.edu> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:38:49 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200612111525.05845.news@budostore.de> <200612111827.54061.news@budostore.de> In-Reply-To: <200612111827.54061.news@budostore.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2006.12.11.92932 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_AGE_BODY 0, __CP_MEDIA_2_BODY 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: trying to install jre X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:47:32 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Karl Sinn wrote: > Hi, > > Am Montag, 11. Dezember 2006 16:16 schrieb Andrew Pantyukhin: >> Try this one: >> /usr/ports/java/diablo-jre15 > > In the ports collection is only diablo-jre13 which does not install. > > Error message like: > diablo-jre-1.3.1.0_2 is forbidden. Vulnerabilities in the browser plugin > > What now? > > Karl Why are you trying to install a Java 1.3.x package? Those are so horribly out of date (6-7 years old) that it's no wonder why it's been marked forbidden due to security issues. Try installing a 1.5 jre and a 1.4 jdk. - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFfZep6CkrZkzMC68RAkh1AJ9mGNNlCw7IHJLtzar2Ti0iHXLwhwCfaCSl DtjE7Bce7NKXMFUkptQQyvM= =2z/K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 18:15:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62ADA16A4FF for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:15:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perikillo@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9EB44253 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:44:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from perikillo@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1265573uge for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:46:00 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=GLd1W+C3GH6jl3sEhWOtUy1L3VV763v+aXnVzWChUXSVZz9WAEK+Bm55D7otOgP7bIXsCKkX6WSOzcU4MP7tz1krYWenXrJKT+HgMxwBnvdwMxLKy9ml0ZvENz5K38a2ZemAgzBEkeMOVNB0nqMOwQ+iGZCIA6C6IdEv8GNIiLg= Received: by 10.82.184.2 with SMTP id h2mr1112306buf.1165859159602; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:45:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.178.5 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:45:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <51d7a5160612110945y5a4b4b92q2d1422678ae2a1b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:45:59 -0800 From: perikillo To: "FreeBSD Mailing List" In-Reply-To: <1165850676.457d783471082@imp4-g19.free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <51d7a5160612101528j470f1db9v623c27213a410529@mail.gmail.com> <457D64CB.7050203@wmptl.com> <1165850676.457d783471082@imp4-g19.free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: VPN Solution for my current Situation. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:15:03 -0000 On 12/11/06, stom@free.fr wrote: > > Hi > > Selon Nathan Vidican : > > > perikillo wrote: > > > Hi people. > > > > > > I want to know which is the best VPN solution i need to my current > > > situation: > > > > > > 2 Offices 1 Mexico-Tijuana 1 E.U.-Otay Mesa(both in the border). > > > > > > In E.U. Offices with have: > > > > > > DNS+Firewall+Proxy Linux > > > Mail Server Linux > > > Samba Linux > > > PBX Altigen Win NT > > > ERP DBA Linux > > > Backup FreeBSD. > > > > > > Mexico > > > PBX Same system > > > Samba > > > ERP DBA(This is the busies from both sites) > > > Backup FreeBSD > > > > > > 65 User 55 Mexico 10 E.U. > > > 40 user in Mexico have mail account && only 15 Internet access > > > all the users in E.U have mail account && Internet access. > > > > > > We share files, E.U. users access the ERP system in Mexico. > > > > > > If the users in Mexico need Internet, they have to reach the proxy in > > > E.U. > > > > > > Both PBX systems have communication for company internal calls, > external > > > calls. > > > > > > All this communication of Voice and Data goes over one private link, > but > > > next year our contract is going to finish, them we need to negotiate > the > > > next contract. > > > > > > Another thing, is that we are planning to start the VoIP solution and > > > see is > > > we can remove our current PBX system with Asterisk. > > > > > > My questions es this: Supposed that we continue with the same Private > > > Line, > > > and we add another public line to do some VPN between both facilities > > > if one > > > link fail the other can continue(backup) or have both sharing the > > > workload, > > > with this workload which VPN solution is the best for my situation: > > > > > > IPsec, OpenVPN, etc? > > > > > > Speaking of FreeBSD, because there is where i want to deploy the VPN > > > solution in Mexico, in E.U. we have there Linux, this can be > problematic? > > > > > > Hope you understand my layout && english, any advice is welcome, > > > thanks all > > > for your time!!! > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > mpd for FreeBSD... it just works. > > The choice is "up to you" - We also use OpenVPN for site-to-site VPN SSL > tunnels > and it is also a good and easy solution. Authentication is based on X509 > certificates for cross-authentication - With OpenVPN's multiple and > fine-grained options. > > We have good performance with strong encryption options. > > The protocol (UDP) encapsulation is also a nice feature. > > The Linux<->FreeBSD is not a problem at all. > > > > > > > -- > > Nathan Vidican > > nvidican@wmptl.com > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > Philippe Laquet. > > I see that OpenVPN is the first choice, i will try this port first && latter continue with other ones. Thanks all for your answer. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 18:15:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301D116A40F for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:15:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F2743E42 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:44:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBBHjmsZ024188 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:45:48 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBBHjm4x000427 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:45:48 -0800 Message-ID: <457D994B.1050106@u.washington.edu> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:45:47 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <457CDE4B.2050103@summerhost.net> <457D063B.2040705@infracaninophile.co.uk> <200612110755.24757.lane@joeandlane.com> <457DBEDA.6040908@summerhost.net> In-Reply-To: <457DBEDA.6040908@summerhost.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2006.12.11.92932 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:15:55 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 listvj wrote: > Lane wrote: >> >> I agree with your advice to build the new server with a clean install, >> if only to prevent any sendmail issues. >> >> But I'm not so sure I understand your assessment that 5.x is "worse >> performing than both 4.x and 6.x." While I agree that 6.x is a great >> improvement in functionality over 5.x, I was not aware of the poor >> performance record of 5.x. >> Do you know of any links to benchmark tests, or other data, which >> would provide some more background on this? >> >> That kind of data would greatly influence my opinion in this >> discussion. Without it I'd be pleased to recommend 5.X, regardless of >> it's pending "drop dead" date, wrt support. I certainly see no need >> to chain myself to any software release cycle, nor, it seems, does the >> original poster. I'm in awe of his patience, and clearly he is >> satisfied with the product if he remains on 4.11. >> >> Thanks, >> >> lane >> ~Still running 5.x > > I'm on 4.11 because I'm lazy and chicken. The server is co-located so > it isn't real convenient to do major upgrades. It might actually be > easier and more cost effective (in terms of my time) to get a > replacement box, set up 6.0 on it, and migrate. > > Btw, I'm sorry for posting this question twice. I posted the first one > with the wrong email address. I was surprised (and disappointed) to see > that the list accepted it as I did not subscribe to the list with that > address. :( As I was told, the list was open so they don't restrict email addresses. They just have a fabulous spam catching system which only admits spam on rare occasions it seems {gotta get a hold of their spamassassin file :D). Unfortunately, this is where having an uninstall and install script would be more than handy on FreeBSD.. if someone could conjure up a script like that, that would be safe to use-even remotely-then maybe this wouldn't be so much of an issue. - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFfZlL6CkrZkzMC68RAgtdAJ9ol57lanXU8LCnxb2JtWP2mYSVVQCfacfT fd+0zG6C+dKy6Lf/bnxdivg= =oQnx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 18:21:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C6716A4CA for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:21:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abedini@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21059446D7 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:54:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from abedini@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1268215uge for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:55:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=OrnUhA3qZewJoXk+LSPIip6BoTUbX4GW+tJrkvwoGVrnoVWagOt/X7XMaaBzILS/VGgmbZWS9Jp0xzDVA5rjKXRwYJJEiHWCIVYCoUQcNiau0XMziS6YmQRF/2I2BvoNYfQptET5TPeAvN09q/ckVwohZ+yR/wT3YNUcqOWdiZ8= Received: by 10.66.244.11 with SMTP id r11mr10239870ugh.1165859718292; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:55:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from client ( [217.218.197.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 32sm7457549ugf.2006.12.11.09.55.12; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:55:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <000801c71d4d$834430c0$7ac5dad9@client> From: To: Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:24:53 +0330 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: help cvs server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:21:49 -0000 hi all dear I need some help to setup cvs server whit laste update=20 file in my Lan and other PC in my network use this server to update . which program can help my? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 18:24:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4848A16A4A7 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:24:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD16F44821 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:57:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i28so743771wra for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:58:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.90.3 with SMTP id n3mr7166733agb.1165859897411; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:58:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 32sm6289614aga.2006.12.11.09.58.16; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:58:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B666EB92D; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:58:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (boss.seibercom.net [192.168.0.4]) (Authenticated sender: gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157F5B85F; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:58:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:58:21 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: User Questions Organization: Seibercom.NET In-Reply-To: <200612111827.54061.news@budostore.de> References: <200612111827.54061.news@budostore.de> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20061211125628.D0C0.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.29 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: trying to install jre X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: User Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:24:00 -0000 On Monday December 11, 2006 at 12:35:21 (PM) Karl Sinn wrote: > Hi, > > Am Montag, 11. Dezember 2006 16:16 schrieb Andrew Pantyukhin: > > Try this one: > > /usr/ports/java/diablo-jre15 > > In the ports collection is only diablo-jre13 which does not install. > > Error message like: > diablo-jre-1.3.1.0_2 is forbidden. Vulnerabilities in the browser plugin > > What now? > > Karl I have /usr/ports/java/diablo-jre15 in my ports collection. When was the last time you updated the ports? -- Gerard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 18:26:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C1B16A4AB for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:26:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C3443DC8 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:59:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin05-en2 [10.13.10.150]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout01/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kBBI0nnp000196; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:00:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from [17.214.13.96] (a17-214-13-96.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin05/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kBBI0ldA011174; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:00:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20061209215103.GA23691@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <41b95770612091344k5350afa9h16fc2a2104142215@mail.gmail.com> <20061209215103.GA23691@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:00:46 -0800 To: Kris Kennaway X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-scanned: yes Cc: freeBSD List Subject: Re: gmake upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:26:16 -0000 On Dec 9, 2006, at 1:51 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote: > gmake does not require gmake to build. If it did, how could you > build it for the first time? At one point, someone had to do something like: for file in *.c do cc -O -c $file done cc -o gmake *.o What becomes more fun is trying to bootstrap something more fundamental to the compiler toolchain, such as the assembler... :-) -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 18:27:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975AA16A508 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:27:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C5C4449C6 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:01:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2006 18:02:21 -0000 Received: from ip176-173-59-62.adsl.versatel.nl (EHLO [192.168.2.5]) [62.59.173.176] by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 11 Dec 2006 19:02:21 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25365336 Message-ID: <457D9D38.3070101@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:02:32 +0100 From: Frank Staals User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Subject: Qemu & Kqemu on FreeBSD 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:27:46 -0000 Unfortunately I need some stupid windows programs so I decided to install win2k in qemu on my laptop. It works well but I have a small question: when running qemu it gives an message it couldn't load kqemu. Allthough I did load the kernel module: frank@Riza$ kldstat Id Refs Address Size Name 25 1 0xc3d78000 7000 aio.ko 26 1 0xc3e75000 1b000 kqemu.ko frank@Riza$ qemu -hda ~/qemu/win2k.qcom2 -localtime -net nic,vlan=0 -net user,vlan=0 Could not open '/dev/kqemu' - QEMU acceleration layer not activated frank@Riza$ ls /dev/ | grep kqemu kqemu0 As shown in the output from the last command, I do have a /dev/kqemu0 when starting qemu, when running it again I get a kqemu1 etc. But for some reason it seems the qemu expects a /dev/kqemu . What can I do about it ? -- -Frank Staals From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 18:30:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA9B16A4AB for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:30:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perikillo@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1739944B9A for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:05:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from perikillo@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1271043uge for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:06:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=ci1WTPDYgFWZBeG1i1+NBiB1Ethhpr97CTAFg1TiIKgZVDOtVNUJ8RKZ1EkdDF3Oie0YK7l+crRly0hS+JboUYIz9KQQtdQFnWRW5noNgaQoh33A4gxxFDKQV4XsiQICHIc3vuBDVyflnmj2g5Atcod6yJcFJmc+olLJqZc7oPg= Received: by 10.82.113.6 with SMTP id l6mr476470buc.1165860413455; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:06:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.178.5 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:06:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <51d7a5160612111006t6604b7a7v53ec4d71d2f658c5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:06:53 -0800 From: perikillo To: "FreeBSD Mailing List" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Question about gmirror? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:30:38 -0000 Hi people. I have one system running FreeBSD 6.1-p11 i have there a Raid-1 setup with gmirror, is working very good && stable, but i need to add another space not for the raid, is for the applicaction im running there like a temporal buffer, my doubt is: Can i add another disk to the system apart from the Raid? Example: Raid-1 --> ad0 + ad2 (/, /usr, /var, /tmp, /home, swap) extra disk -->ad3 (/buffer) I have this doubt only. Thanks all for your time. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 18:34:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC10C16A47B for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:34:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ysidhu@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F3744158 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:12:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ysidhu@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so267365ana for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:13:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=rdyGaEthGajOAocelm/uGblwOA+wnRDkmjLbVpl/OpGHFiImCHRseCYb5z4U+vjqvHTFPEGLRv2FJKOLgwREu9eTjdNLPQoBocS6sb0BoTmdhzBvImPT2KDBj4uKImWjzWouPDXYXhMzRjB5KeVQ4/u4lPRaksxvQKOFeclAFjI= Received: by 10.78.118.19 with SMTP id q19mr3338835huc.1165860816093; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:13:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.149.7 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:13:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:13:35 -0800 From: "Y Sidhu" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Cannot Load FreeBSD 6.2 64 bit and maybe other versions as well X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:34:53 -0000 I am a newbie and have gone though past posts and have been looking at the last couple of weeks of posts go by. I have not seen anything similar to my problem. I cannot load an OS except under ACPI-Disabled. I can boot into safe mode, but cannot configure a working network interface. Therefore, I cannot send in a dmesg output. Here is some data I have gathered: Details a. SuperMicro X7DBR-8+ / X7DBR-I+ b. Intel 3.2 GHz Xeon dual core dual cpu, K8 class cpu c. BIOS - Phoenix (just upgraded to 1.2A from 1.1C) The upgrade has had no affect on this problem as far as I can tell. d. Dual Ethernet - Intel Pro/1000 Network Connection Version 6.2.9. em0 is IRQ 5 at device 0.0 on pci4. em1 is IRQ 11 at device 0.1 on pci4. Also, when I am booted in safe mode, in dmesg, there is an entry "em IRQ 10 at device 2.0 on pci5." e. SCSI - Adaptec version 4.3. AIC 7902 Ultra 320, PCI-X ID=7 f. One 73 GB Seagate Cheetah 10K.7 SCSI hard drive, Model ST3207LC. I have tested this and another drive out without any media errors. The Adaptec adapter sees the drive and capacity fine. g. When I try to boot normally, the messages scroll by and the system freezes at: "waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle" h. When I disable ACPI either under the BIOS's settings or select Disable ACPI when loading FreeBSD, the system loads but I cannot get the ethernet interface to come up. ifconfig shows all the right values. I have also used route delete default and route add default - to no avail. There is a message which pops up saying "em0: watchdog timeout - resetting" Looking into dmesg output, I see: em0 link state changed to UP and em0 link state DOWN repeat over and over again. i. 1 GB ram and have tested it with memtest 86 without any errors. My Gut a. Something is causing a good old fashioned IRQ conflict. I have 1 drive and 1 cdrom on this machine. b. The SCSI ACPI79xx driver is not there or not loading Hoping I am looking for a nudge in the right direction. -- Yudhvir Singh Sidhu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 18:38:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1961C16A4CE for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:38:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D87843DF4 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:16:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id kBBIHi2R073785; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:17:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:16:21 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200612100905.30430.kirk@strauser.com> <20061211054125.GB681@pubbox.net> <457D1B24.8060109@extracktor.com> In-Reply-To: <457D1B24.8060109@extracktor.com> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612111316.21351.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Foo JH Subject: Re: Setting up RAID-1 on 2 unequal disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:38:01 -0000 On Monday 11 December 2006 03:47, Foo JH wrote: > Hi all, > > I unfortunately have 2 uneuqally sized SATA disks to set up a mirrored > shared folder: 80GB and 120GB. On the 120GB I plan to set up this way: > > /temp 2GB (double the system memory) > /shared 80GB > / 38GB > > I plan to mirror /shared onto the 80GB. It won't be bootable, but I can > always mount it onto another FreeBSD machine. > > I've read some articles on mirroring on non-equal disks, notably: > http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/mirror/ > > My question is: is there an easier way to do this? The example looks > quiet daunting for a noobie FreeBSD admin like me. I would use gmirror. The example page you cite is very thorough and covers multiple scenarios. I have found gmirror to be extremely easy to use and set up; much more so than gvinum or even ataraid. Gmirrror allows you to use any geom provider as a member (consumer) of a mirrored set. That includes entire disks (e.g. ad4), slices (e.g. ad4s1), partitions (e.g. ad4s1a), or even other complex structures (such as a gstripe set). The only hard part is going to be labeling the 120GB disk correctly. You will most likely want to do it manually using bsdlabel. One approach would be something like the following. Assume ad4 is the 120GB disk and ad6 is the 80GB disk. Boot up using a FreeBSD install disk and go into "Fixit" mode. # fdisk -BI /dev/ad6 (it's safe to ignore the warning here) # bsdlabel -Bw /dev/ad6s1 # sysctl kern.module_path="/dist/boot/kernel" # gmirror load # gmirror label -b load shared /dev/ad6s1a ("shared" is the name of your volume.. you can use whatever you want) # gmirror list (will show you details about your new "broken" mirror. Make a note of the "Mediasize" number listed under the consumer.) # fdisk -BI /dev/ad4 (it's safe to ignore the warning here) # bsdlabel -Bw /dev/ad4s1 (these are only needed if you don't like/don't know how to use vi) # EDITOR=ee # export EDITOR # bsdlabel -e /dev/ad4s1 Now comes the tricky part. The number shown on the c: line of the label is the number of 512-byte sectors on the disk. It's good practice to leave 16 sectors unused at the beginning of the disk; you can see this in the default whole-disk a: line. Figure out how big you need to make the slice for the other side of the mirror by dividing the Mediasize number you noted previously by 512. Then figure out how big you want your swap (if any--you didn't mention any above) and /temp partitions by multiplying out to the number of bytes then dividing by 512. Add all of that up plus the 16-sector space at the beginning and subtract from the size (c: line) to determine how much is left for /. Calculate all the offsets and put in the fstype (either 4.2BSD or swap), and put zeroes in the other columns. As a reference, here is one of my disks: # /dev/ad4s1: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 6291456 1048502 4.2BSD 0 0 0 b: 1048486 16 swap c: 156312513 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit d: 117266625 39045888 4.2BSD 0 0 0 e: 31705930 7339958 4.2BSD 0 0 0 Save the label and exit the editor. Now to finish up: # gmirror insert shared /dev/ad4s1e (be sure to use the actual partition device you set up above) # newfs -U /dev/mirror/shared ( /shared ) # newfs -U /dev/ad4s1a ( / ) # newfs -U /dev/ad4s1d ( /temp ) Then exit fixit mode and do a Standard installation. Don't let sysinstall re-label or newfs anything, just specify the mount points for your / and /shared filesystems. You'll have to mount the mirror after you're done with setup (just put it in /etc/fstab manually). Obviously, you should understand what all of the above does before you do any of it, and may need to make changes. Good luck, and feel free to ask additional questions. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 18:47:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A574116A407 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:47:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A8D444B5 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:24:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBBIN46i066799; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:23:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kBBIN4lq066798; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:23:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:23:04 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: listvj Message-ID: <20061211182304.GA66707@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <457CDE4B.2050103@summerhost.net> <457D063B.2040705@infracaninophile.co.uk> <200612110755.24757.lane@joeandlane.com> <457DBEDA.6040908@summerhost.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <457DBEDA.6040908@summerhost.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:47:43 -0000 On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 03:26:02PM -0500, listvj wrote: > Lane wrote: > >On Monday 11 December 2006 01:18, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > > >>listvj wrote: > >> > >>>I'm interested in upgrading from 4.11 to 5.x. I currently track 4.x > >>>stable using cvsup, but I've never done a major version upgrade. > >>> > >>>First, should I bother? My hardware has dual pentium 1.13 processors > >>>with 1G ram (I'm considering maxing it out at 4). I host email and web > >>>sites for a few domains on this machine and I have four jails configured > >>>on it which will have to be upgraded too. I have users counting > >>>particularly on mail service not being down for too long. > >>> > >>>Other than the obvious advice to start with a good backup, can anyone > >>>tell me: > >>> > >>>1) Will I gain a major benefit from upgrading > >>>2) Where should I look for instructions / advice on upgrading > >>>3) Also any general advice from personal experience. > >>>4) Just how risky is this? > >> > >Matthew, > > > >I agree with your advice to build the new server with a clean install, if > >only to prevent any sendmail issues. > > > >But I'm not so sure I understand your assessment that 5.x is "worse > >performing than both 4.x and 6.x." While I agree that 6.x is a great > >improvement in functionality over 5.x, I was not aware of the poor > >performance record of 5.x. > > > >Do you know of any links to benchmark tests, or other data, which would > >provide some more background on this? > > > >That kind of data would greatly influence my opinion in this discussion. > >Without it I'd be pleased to recommend 5.X, regardless of it's pending > >"drop dead" date, wrt support. I certainly see no need to chain myself to > >any software release cycle, nor, it seems, does the original poster. I'm > >in awe of his patience, and clearly he is satisfied with the product if he > >remains on 4.11. I just remember seeing a number of posts about reduced performance due to major changes and lots of debug stuff left in for the time being. > > > >Thanks, > > > >lane > >~Still running 5.x > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > I'm on 4.11 because I'm lazy and chicken. The server is co-located so > it isn't real convenient to do major upgrades. It might actually be > easier and more cost effective (in terms of my time) to get a > replacement box, set up 6.0 on it, and migrate. Well, if you can really do that, it is a nice way of going -- especially jumping to 6.xx because you really want to do a clean install of 6.xx because it has some file system improvements what you won't get by just doing an upgrade without rebuilding the file systems (it would just keep using the old file systems if you don't do a clean install - it is not a devastating loss, but you might as well get the full treatment now). So, install 6.2 on a new machine and then move over your working files. I always recommend arranging file systems to make it easy to keep your own stuff separate from system stuff and ports, but some things don't seem to encourage that behavior, unfortunately. Go all the way to 6.2 for the new system. 6.xx is good. I haven't had any trouble with it. My only problem is that no-one has upgraded an AFS client to run on it yet - not ARLA nor OpenAFS so I had to put together a separate machine running 5.5 to have an AFS client. The 6.2 RELEASE is supposed to be out any minute now. The date has been slipping. I haven't tried to follow what is being waited on. > > Btw, I'm sorry for posting this question twice. I posted the first one > with the wrong email address. I was surprised (and disappointed) to see > that the list accepted it as I did not subscribe to the list with that > address. :( Don't worry about it. The FreeBSD questions allows all posts except it does have some spam filtering on it. The rationale is that the questions must get through regardless of whether someone is subscribed; that the few spam misses are less of a problem than potentially blocking legitimate questions. ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 18:57:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B2416A4FC for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:57:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (pool-71-245-104-192.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [71.245.104.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B2344869 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:35:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (localhost.home.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBBIaIOE011973 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:36:18 -0800 Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id kBBIaIlX011970 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:36:18 -0800 Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id SAA23589; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:32:53 GMT Message-Id: <200612111832.SAA23589@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:32:53 +0000 From: Dieter Subject: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O (was: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:57:09 -0000 > Did this problem start before you made port2file run with rtprio? Yes. I only added rtprio because it wasn't working. > Can you please include a copy of your kernel configuration file and dmesg? I think you asked that before: :-) > > OK, that's correct. Can you also provide details of your disk > > hardware (e.g. dmesg) and kernel configuration? > > FreeBSD 6.0 > > Kernel is stock except for addition of: > > device atapicam # needed to burn dvd > > /boot/loader.conf: > > console="comconsole" > hw.ata.wc=0 > hw.ata.atapi_dma="1" > kern.ipc.nmbclusters="256000" > > Mainboard: Tyan Tomcat k8e 2865 > > CPU: AMD64 3000+ > > Chipset: Nvidia nforce4 ultra > > Memory: 2 GB DDR400 ECC > > Disks: 4x Seagate 7200 rpm SATA > 1x Seagate 7200 rpm PATA > 1x LG CD/DVD > > atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xe000-0xe00f at device 6.0 on pci0 > ata0: on atapci0 > ata1: on atapci0 > atapci1: port 0x9f0-0x9f7,0xbf0-0xbf3,0x970-0x977,0xb70-0xb73,0xcc00-0xcc0f mem 0xfebfb00 > 0-0xfebfbfff irq 10 at device 7.0 on pci0 > ata2: on atapci1 > ata3: on atapci1 > atapci2: port 0x9e0-0x9e7,0xbe0-0xbe3,0x960-0x967,0xb60-0xb63,0xb800-0xb80f mem 0xfebfa00 > 0-0xfebfafff irq 11 at device 8.0 on pci0 > ata4: on atapci2 > ata5: on atapci2 > acd0: DVDR at ata0-master UDMA66 > ad2: 305245MB at ata1-master UDMA100 > ad4: 238475MB at ata2-master SATA150 > ad6: 238475MB at ata3-master SATA150 > ad8: 238475MB at ata4-master SATA150 > ad10: 305245MB at ata5-master SATA150 > cd0 at ata0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 Since then I added another Seagate 7200 rpm PATA, connected via a PATA-to-USB. The idea being to get a different controller path to a disk. Although I think all I/O has to go through the nforce one way or another. This USB disk writes at about 15 MB/s instead of the 6-7 MB/s, but otherwise they interfere with each other same as two disks connected directly to the nforce. Perhaps a clue in there somewhere? umass0: Prolific Technology Inc. ATAPI-6 Bridge Controller, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 2 da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device da0: 40.000MB/s transfers da0: 305245MB (625142449 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 38913C) The Ethernet is on the mainboard: pcib5: at device 13.0 on pci0 pci5: on pcib5 bge0: mem 0xfe4f0000-0xfe4fffff irq 11 at device 0.0 on pci5 miibus1: on bge0 brgphy0: on miibus1 brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto The only stuff that says Giant or GIANT-LOCKED is atkbd0 only used with firmware usb the new disk, otherwise not used nve not in use fwe not in use Is Giant the only mutex/lock that could be a bottleneck across disks? I can't figure out anything else that would create a common bottleneck across drives. The nforce can read from all four SATA drives at once as fast as the disks can go, 65-70 MB/s per drive at the fast end of the platter. I assume that the nforce doesn't care about read vs write, and is not the bottleneck. The filesystem has to allocate blocks and such, but that shouldn't be common across drives. It does this without the CPU being maxed out, assuming you believe the numbers from systat -vmstat or top. Memory buffer cache? However they do that these days... I was thinking maybe part of port2file's circular buffer was getting paged out, so I added mlock(2) of the buffer. Still fails. :-( Writing to disk doesn't seem to hurt the Ethernet. If I direct the output of port2file to /dev/null it works fine. I don't suppose you happen to know how to enable SATA's NCQ queuing? I did some experiments with rtprio and dd. rtprio reduces the effect of other disk activity somewhat, but not enough. I noticed that the transfer rates as reported by systat -vmstat varied more than I would expect. First one disk would be faster for a few seconds, then the other. Sometimes they would be about equal. The sum of the two drives looked to be approx constant. The sum was only slightly higher than a single drive by itself. It certainly smells like there is *some* single resource for writing that all the disks have to share. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 18:57:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 501D616A40F for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:57:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan-tiefert@t-online.de) Received: from mailout10.sul.t-online.com (mailout10.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34AB043D3F for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:36:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stevan-tiefert@t-online.de) Received: from fwd27.aul.t-online.de by mailout10.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1Gtq1c-0001al-00; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:37:16 +0100 Received: from localhost (S8Zh1ZZdQeOEtf8Oe0w7OJnw7PYy4ADfq2GGMBPdWu-nsjYcoLuhrT@[172.20.101.250]) by fwd27.aul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1Gtq1Q-0adLyS0; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:37:04 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20061211112145.K9462@pangrango.bentala.co.id> References: <1GtXyL-0i7WWu0@fwd26.sul.t-online.de> <20061211112145.K9462@pangrango.bentala.co.id> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:37:04 +0100 To: "Abdullah Koro" X-UMS: email X-Mailer: TOI Kommunikationscenter V7-5-3 From: "stevan-tiefert@t-online.de" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1Gtq1Q-0adLyS0@fwd27.aul.t-online.de> X-ID: S8Zh1ZZdQeOEtf8Oe0w7OJnw7PYy4ADfq2GGMBPdWu-nsjYcoLuhrT@t-dialin.net X-TOI-MSGID: 5bd0a0b9-76a0-46aa-b705-3f03c3dedb13 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dowload FreeBSD 6.1 via bittorrent X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:57:48 -0000 Hi Koro, don't be insulted but your answer was not very satisfactory for me. I will try to contact the webmaster directly. With regards -----Original Message----- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 05:22:54 +0100 Subject: Re: Dowload FreeBSD 6.1 via bittorrent From: Abdullah Koro To: Stevan Tiefert Hi Stevan Why don't you download via official freebsd ftp server. you can also download the ISO file right? regards, koro On Sun, 10 Dec 2006, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > Hello, > > does somebody knows why the torrents for FreeBSD 6.1 is not working? Will it ever works in the future? > > With regards > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 19:00:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C57016A533 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:00:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: from feb.ukrtel.net (feb.ukrtel.net [195.5.6.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C414443A8 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:43:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: from 130-73-124-91.pool.ukrtel.net ([91.124.73.130] helo=host.my.domain) by feb.ukrtel.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gtq7t-0000Hr-KW for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:43:45 +0200 Received: from host.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host.my.domain (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBBIhYuB016376 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:43:34 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: (from elisej@localhost) by host.my.domain (8.13.7/8.13.6/Submit) id kBBIhYfq016375 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:43:34 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:43:33 +0200 From: a@zeos.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061211184333.GA16342@host.my.domain> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) Subject: What is microsoft-ds port 445? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:00:14 -0000 What is microsoft-ds port #445? Elisej Babenko From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 19:00:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F279416A514 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:00:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4A0443D6 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:43:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1280286uge for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:44:30 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WQ3DsnuvO4awqH2oUif5HINNVEgM8J1Ovrs0djM5+TLmDAgS+vzesP2sZUHedJyf5Uz//qKi+x/xDIZD5h51HbXkGwODth9DhVrMlvp0+IkAiyY4qL125QX+tCUmpA8b/ao4TPgFy4Tqa02dg/mLdkr4nlORTsu7aAbYvlAmlIY= Received: by 10.82.118.2 with SMTP id q2mr484658buc.1165862669512; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:44:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.141.18 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:44:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:44:29 -0800 From: "Jeff Mohler" To: perikillo In-Reply-To: <51d7a5160612111006t6604b7a7v53ec4d71d2f658c5@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <51d7a5160612111006t6604b7a7v53ec4d71d2f658c5@mail.gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Question about gmirror? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:00:34 -0000 Sure..just mount it as /newdisk or something. On 12/11/06, perikillo wrote: > Hi people. > > I have one system running FreeBSD 6.1-p11 i have there a Raid-1 setup with > gmirror, is working very good && stable, but i need to add another space not > for the raid, is for the applicaction im running there like a temporal > buffer, my doubt is: > > Can i add another disk to the system apart from the Raid? > > Example: > Raid-1 --> ad0 + ad2 (/, /usr, /var, /tmp, /home, swap) > extra disk -->ad3 (/buffer) > > I have this doubt only. > > Thanks all for your time. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 19:01:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8D2416A512 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:01:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dthomas53@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E7B44435 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:45:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dthomas53@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1280858uge for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:46:46 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=H4CV28Fh/mSXEZ2JfOjo4wlPvhjsFusocsUnTYlzyodJZr0YGwS5veB+rLD79g8HRBVTXAIH5j8xD9Z0cPdUonbUDGXDaUhw+HSV9ZinQdfFNlhgxk708IJ1J/odaXfV2sWPktMFnNcvor/n7FMBG44kUhKmTW3pI4KoCvBd1Y0= Received: by 10.78.158.11 with SMTP id g11mr1937413hue.1165862805677; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:46:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.156.2 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:46:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:46:45 -0500 From: "David Stanford" To: "Karl Sinn" In-Reply-To: <200612111827.54061.news@budostore.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200612111525.05845.news@budostore.de> <200612111827.54061.news@budostore.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: trying to install jre X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:01:45 -0000 > What now? > Looks like you forgot to update your ports collection. Easiest way to update them: # portsnap fetch extract Or you can use cvsup following the handbook (portsnap is also documented there): http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.html Also, you may have to first download the Java binaries and place them in /usr/ports/distfiles (though I am not sure if this a requirement still, since Java is now open sourced). Update your ports using portsnap and then attempt to install /usr/ports/java/diablo-jre15; the Java binary downloads can be found here: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/downloads/java.shtml -David -- [root@fbsd ~]# fortune Happiness is just an illusion, filled with sadness and confusion. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 19:09:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476C016A4A7 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:09:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from up@3.am) Received: from richard2.pil.net (mail.pil.net [207.7.198.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B40A443DE8 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:04:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from up@3.am) Received: (qmail 47318 invoked by uid 1825); 11 Dec 2006 19:05:27 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Dec 2006 19:05:27 -0000 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:05:27 -0500 (EST) From: up@3.am X-X-Sender: up@richard2.pil.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Questions re: disklabel for external USB drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:09:39 -0000 I just got an external USB drive that I want to use for disk-based backups. It is important that this drive be useable on different FreeBSD servers that we have. I got it working on a test server ok, but I noticed that the sysinstall utility labeled the device as: /dev/da0s1d Since the test server only has an IDE drive, that's fine, but this external USB drive needs to be able to work on productions servers that already have SCSI and SAS devices, one of which already uses that label for its active "/usr" partition. Is there an easy way to force the device to work as something like: /dev/da1s1d on all of the servers, including ones that do not already have a SCSI disk subsystem and existing /dev/da0 devices? TIA, James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor up@3.am http://3.am ========================================================================= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 19:10:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045CB16A527 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:10:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DC743E1A for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:06:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin05-en2 [10.13.10.150]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout14/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kBBJ7Q5s008514; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:07:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from [17.214.13.96] (a17-214-13-96.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin05/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kBBJ6DW6009612; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:06:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20061211184333.GA16342@host.my.domain> References: <20061211184333.GA16342@host.my.domain> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:06:12 -0800 To: a@zeos.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-scanned: yes Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is microsoft-ds port 445? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:10:43 -0000 On Dec 11, 2006, at 10:43 AM, a@zeos.net wrote: > What is microsoft-ds port #445? Mildly off-topic for this list, but it's used by directory-services, aka "Active Directory".... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 19:11:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67DE316A516 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:11:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3726D43DF0 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:07:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin05-en2 [10.13.10.150]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout04/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kBBJ226I011734; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:02:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from [17.214.13.96] (a17-214-13-96.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin05/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kBBJ1xD2007719; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:02:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <576dcbc20612110227gdb2ddb2x9f26cb15923d7e06@mail.gmail.com> References: <454E9F7B.5010105@outstep.com> <454EB6D6.3030807@infowest.com> <454EBEEC.1060002@u.washington.edu> <454F210C.9000602@outstep.com> <20061106151007.GD23884@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> <576dcbc20612110227gdb2ddb2x9f26cb15923d7e06@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:01:58 -0800 To: lveax X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-scanned: yes Cc: freeBSD List Subject: Re: MAC OS X connection to FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:11:09 -0000 On Dec 11, 2006, at 2:27 AM, lveax wrote: > who are the people that works in apple and also a freebsd developer > now? Jordan Hubbard and Wilfredo Sanchez come to mind, and maybe Garance Drosihn would also qualify, as I think he was part of Apple's darwin- developers, IIRC. There are others. :-) -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 19:12:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D3F16A4FE for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:12:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jjuanino@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9795243D36 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:09:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jjuanino@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1286718uge for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:10:09 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-operating-system:user-agent; b=AomiTekQx+KC4B6Se931iN0RRIK8ny3WR0XAs2V1HZE6hqe0aTxF/IquewZ4kC4PCATOEIhvsDCDhqwnmtl7uqABCKnUEzHpwPM9q8WQSmwIbDDas52k77gJGsiuiZMkMe0Nl5+vXpXklH1ftyMZI3/NrgLIwimuSswnK6KQKIA= Received: by 10.67.22.7 with SMTP id z7mr4097869ugi.1165864209230; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:10:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from gauss.sanabria.es ( [84.77.81.191]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j33sm5947383ugc.2006.12.11.11.10.08; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:10:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by gauss.sanabria.es (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 762484046; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:10:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:10:07 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_G=2E?= Juanino To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061211191007.GA1439@gauss.sanabria.es> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <457C0422.7080609@gmx.net> <20061210131322.GA33464@gauss.sanabria.es> <20061210132330.GB33464@gauss.sanabria.es> <457C9A56.5090901@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <457C9A56.5090901@gmx.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Subject: Re: Freebsd dbus / hal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:12:07 -0000 --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El lunes 11 de diciembre a las 00:37:58 CET, felix.schalck escribi=F3: > Jos=E9 G. Juanino wrote: > >El domingo 10 de diciembre a las 14:13:22 CET, Jos=E9 G. Juanino escribi= =F3: > > =20 > >>El domingo 10 de diciembre a las 13:57:06 CET, felix.schalck escribi=F3: > >> =20 > >>>Hi, > >>> > >>>Does someone know a good how-to to set up dbus and hal under freebsd ? > >>>Im trying to run gnome 2.16 , and it always claims not finding the=20 > >>>dbus-socket to connect to... > >>> =20 > >>Add the following in the .xinitrc file: > >> > >>eval `dbus-launch` > >>export DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS DBUS_SESSION_BUS_PID > >> =20 > > > >I forget that is also necessary start dbus-daemon. The best way is in > >rc.conf: > > > >dbus_enable=3D"YES" > > =20 > Thank you for your help, but it's still not working: got the same error.= =20 > Is there any way to get it verbose ? Perhaps I'm missing some=20 > package/config. You need devel/dbus port. Try to execute in a shell: $ dbus-launch after /usr/local/etc/rc.d/dbus forcestart The response must be something like: DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS=3Dunix:path=3D/var/tmp/dbus-HQmF4igtIW,guid=3De037= 99433336424efaa98000457dac03 DBUS_SESSION_BUS_PID=3D1919 This variables need to be known by the applications which are using dbus. Regards --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFfa0PFOo0zaS9RnIRArOhAJ9OLRxhfuXNKMTBL1geKkK52EcDOACeOhe3 uQR4qN0JSe02BEQFC5w4G3M= =CNp2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 19:22:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6CD16A501 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:22:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@wiliweld.com) Received: from typhoon.he.net (typhoon.he.net [64.62.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E16B043D8D for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:18:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bill@wiliweld.com) Received: from liam.billschoolcraft.com ([71.141.72.46]) by typhoon.he.net for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:19:20 -0800 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:18:37 -0800 (PST) From: Bill-Schoolcraft X-X-Sender: bill@liam.billschoolcraft.com To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: System-ID: [en] (Athlon i686 GNU/Linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Subject: "dd" mini-iso image to USB pendrive? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:22:37 -0000 Hello Family, I'm trying to get my server to boot off my Sandisk "Cruzer" 1-gig pen drive with an ISO image dd'd to the pendrive. It fails and the same ISO image will boot off the USB CDROM with no issues. Is there any specific howto on doing this? TIA -- Bill Schoolcraft <*> http://wiliweld.com "Health nuts are going to feel stupid someday, lying in hospitals dying of nothing." -- Redd Foxx From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 19:23:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA57E16A417 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:23:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E59AA43E91 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:19:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBBJHTm9067005; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:17:29 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kBBJHTaO067004; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:17:29 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:17:29 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: up@3.am Message-ID: <20061211191729.GA66953@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Questions re: disklabel for external USB drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:23:27 -0000 On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 02:05:27PM -0500, up@3.am wrote: > > I just got an external USB drive that I want to use for disk-based > backups. It is important that this drive be useable on different FreeBSD > servers that we have. > > I got it working on a test server ok, but I noticed that the sysinstall > utility labeled the device as: > > /dev/da0s1d > > Since the test server only has an IDE drive, that's fine, but this > external USB drive needs to be able to work on productions servers that > already have SCSI and SAS devices, one of which already uses that label > for its active "/usr" partition. > > Is there an easy way to force the device to work as something like: > > /dev/da1s1d > > on all of the servers, including ones that do not already have a SCSI disk > subsystem and existing /dev/da0 devices? You don't have to do that unless you are worried about getting confused. If you put the drive on a machine that already has da0 used up, it will magically become da1. The label doesn't have anything to do with whether it is da0 or da1. That is determined by its position on the controller. I think, in FreeBSD SCSI device stuff, you can force it to be something, but I have never done it and don't know how - and since it doesn't matter, don't see the reason to try. ////jerry > > TIA, > > James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor > up@3.am http://3.am > ========================================================================= > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 19:35:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B720316A47B for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:35:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svein.h@lvor.halvorsen.cc) Received: from merke.itea.ntnu.no (merke.itea.ntnu.no [129.241.7.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC3943F16 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:29:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from svein.h@lvor.halvorsen.cc) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by merke.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362FE13C923 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:30:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from maren.thelosingend.net (maren.math.ntnu.no [129.241.211.48]) by merke.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with SMTP for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:30:43 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 87436 invoked by uid 88); 11 Dec 2006 20:30:43 +0100 Received: from 10.84-48-62.nextgentel.com (HELO [10.0.0.2]) (84.48.62.10) by maren.thelosingend.net (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:30:20 +0100 Message-ID: <457DB1BB.8080201@lvor.halvorsen.cc> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:30:03 +0100 From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060522) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Staals References: <457D9D38.3070101@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <457D9D38.3070101@gmx.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=9198BB40; url=mailto:pgpkey@svein.halvorsen.cc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5C4F967E93C5DB49E346F536" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Content-Scanned: with sophos and spamassassin at mailgw.ntnu.no. Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Qemu & Kqemu on FreeBSD 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:35:45 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5C4F967E93C5DB49E346F536 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Frank Staals wrote: > Unfortunately I need some stupid windows programs so I decided to=20 > install win2k in qemu on my laptop. It works well but I have a small=20 > question: when running qemu it gives an message it couldn't load kqemu.= =20 > Allthough I did load the kernel module: See this thread for some info: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2006-April/001973.ht= ml Someone claims that is does work, despite some devfs weirdness. Svein Halvor --------------enig5C4F967E93C5DB49E346F536 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: mailto:pgpkey@svein.halvorsen.cc to get my PGP-key iD8DBQFFfbG7hQg3vZGYu0ARAtAkAJ9Tz1fmAznu5b6D+vMwM6URjb9KGQCfRO8n mUY1p8zqKmIZXtixe/x/3VI= =l33U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5C4F967E93C5DB49E346F536-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 19:35:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BDD16A407 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:35:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AFA143EF9 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:29:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Gtqqn-0003SQ-4G for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:30:09 +0100 Received: from 89-172-58-248.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([89.172.58.248]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:30:09 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 89-172-58-248.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:30:09 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:29:46 +0100 Lines: 35 Message-ID: References: <20061210102636.Y632@chylonia.3miasto.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE3CBFF0C99C20D4AE8FE172D" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-58-248.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) In-Reply-To: <20061210102636.Y632@chylonia.3miasto.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Sender: news Subject: Re: OOPS www proxy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:35:50 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE3CBFF0C99C20D4AE8FE172D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wojciech Puchar wrote: > is anybody using it with success. >=20 > for me it works. and works really fast, much faster than squid but afte= r > maybe 8-12 hours it crashes. >=20 > is it buggy or i'm doing something wrong? I used it for several years and am still using it, but not on high loads. It works without crashing on the default install (ports) settings.= --------------enigE3CBFF0C99C20D4AE8FE172D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFfbGqldnAQVacBcgRAnSrAJ43cGAnHMIFrSHsERoFEE/hX5SOWwCg7Rtb 0r74S0sSHpGgUetLR4AvCCc= =vqS7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE3CBFF0C99C20D4AE8FE172D-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 20:22:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170E916A526 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:22:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A73B544531 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:48:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBBJkiNV067238; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:46:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kBBJkiIW067235; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:46:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:46:44 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: up@3.am Message-ID: <20061211194644.GA67170@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20061211191729.GA66953@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Questions re: disklabel for external USB drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:22:03 -0000 On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 02:26:42PM -0500, up@3.am wrote: > On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 02:05:27PM -0500, up@3.am wrote: > > > > > > > > I just got an external USB drive that I want to use for disk-based > > > backups. It is important that this drive be useable on different FreeBSD > > > servers that we have. > > > > > > I got it working on a test server ok, but I noticed that the sysinstall > > > utility labeled the device as: > > > > > > /dev/da0s1d > > > > > > Since the test server only has an IDE drive, that's fine, but this > > > external USB drive needs to be able to work on productions servers that > > > already have SCSI and SAS devices, one of which already uses that label > > > for its active "/usr" partition. > > > > > > Is there an easy way to force the device to work as something like: > > > > > > /dev/da1s1d > > > > > > on all of the servers, including ones that do not already have a SCSI disk > > > subsystem and existing /dev/da0 devices? > > > > You don't have to do that unless you are worried about getting confused. > > If you put the drive on a machine that already has da0 used up, it will > > magically become da1. The label doesn't have anything to do with > > whether it is da0 or da1. That is determined by its position on the > > controller. > > > > I think, in FreeBSD SCSI device stuff, you can force it to be > > something, but I have never done it and don't know how - and since > > it doesn't matter, don't see the reason to try. > > > > ////jerry > > Cool! Thanks! Of course, you have to keep track of the different device labels when you mount the file systems and/or put them in /etc/fstab on whichever machine so they mount the right device for that machine. ////jerry > > James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor > up@3.am http://3.am > ========================================================================= > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 20:32:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14FA716A52D for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:32:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F1F44977 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:05:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1300873uge for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:06:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; b=aHQKtp1r2sr1vd1iGD5oknqAw0q3QCrcZW4s4aLREVtoEzIXNV6+dh3G7nn7BZlz5gF1SPWvtHNp6LFBNLJxnnXQuL3XBcnQc1q6rHfjvge3JP8cZ3PGqiRi2GbqgwlyIWJMckNd1C9QwLMOnBNZ509ma999Fh2FtR6JtWoa3sA= Received: by 10.82.172.15 with SMTP id u15mr1138784bue.1165867105093; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:58:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.176.11 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:58:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <539c60b90612111158g607f800dh862fd4d27ea5ac28@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:58:24 -0700 From: "Steve Franks" Sender: bahamasfranks@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Google-Sender-Auth: be0825e1f7557911 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: easy question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:32:22 -0000 I hope. Looks like xorg remaps the arrow keys for it's own uses - how do I get command history in an xterm instead of ctrl-key like gibberish. I'd like to edit, like you do in a vtty with the up-arrow, not just !!. I'm sure the answer exists, I just can't format a seach to find it on my own...;) Thanks, Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 20:32:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A262016A4FE for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:32:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B7144993 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:06:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so14766nfc for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:07:04 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=SoN0xAXS2t2eY9jr56ceEQ9CAGcrzUmRKWzRR59oe2h95gPxGX+QHDnmhzp4hPb2Gi7oqQ+7VjYDVwADyBaX9dirJ9Wz3n2bzjSJzozcOmWmUeripz2YxsB5ETYYvtTunKj7R4E5HxJgYH6K9npyekre+vMBqxIzeGTSCWX7+qE= Received: by 10.82.105.13 with SMTP id d13mr1143205buc.1165867624131; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:07:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.176.11 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:07:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <539c60b90612111207s31bebbc0nbc82956cbc2136a1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:07:03 -0700 From: "Steve Franks" Sender: bahamasfranks@gmail.com To: "dick hoogendijk" In-Reply-To: <1165691646.3362.4.camel@arwen> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1165691646.3362.4.camel@arwen> X-Google-Sender-Auth: f79cf1ea376cd45c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Users Questions Subject: Re: X server remote login X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:32:51 -0000 I'm a noob myself, but I just did this, so: 1) edit etc/ttys, so the 8th one has xdm and change the no to yes in the second to last field (test by rebooting, should go to an x login, after a slight pasue) ctrl-alt-f will still get you back to the text terminals. 2) edit the .Xaccess file in the location specified for xdm in the handbook, add a "LISTEN *" line. 3) edit the xdm-config file, and uncomment that last line that says xdm shouldn't look outside. 4) We use Xming and OpenSSH to connect from windows - configure Xming for the ssh login method, and tell it to run a program, namely "gnome-seesion", "xfce4-session", or "xterm" depending on how much X you want. I'll send you my Xming launcher file if you like. Thoughts - make sure you can run startx normally on the machine, and logon once with raw ssh so it can do the key thing and store it - doesn't seem to work from Xming that first time. I'm aauming you are connecting from windows. On another freebsd box, one would assume it's easier thanconfiguring xming. best, Steve On 12/9/06, dick hoogendijk wrote: > > I run solaris and FreeBSD. In solaris I can login on a remote machine > with an X session. I can't see my freebsd machine though. I have no idea > where the config to make this possible resides on FreeBSD. I guess X > runs without broadcasting itself on fbsd. How can I change this? > > -- > http://nagual.nl/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE > ++ Running FreeBSD 6.1 ++ Solaris 10 6/06 ++ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Steve Franks, KE7BTE Staff Engineer La Palma Devices, LLC http://www.lapalmadevices.com (520) 312-0089 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 20:34:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7DA816A403 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:34:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D627744A6F for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:09:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so15592nfc for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:10:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=CIkKRIxtbA9ne+99mFg06gZruRais9oW3WIpXusN2F84vrEkQX9hkjs6gor8YjTQRFRtsJuYtHM/KWOEPA9JgngQlOCUipoi4Tz9VMYtHnHmnragWklAaAJYSQ+JhBTWFnOAvhqQ9AClBTjKuOaB0+NCljnjgpOY2YfzwmwvPe4= Received: by 10.82.114.3 with SMTP id m3mr776425buc.1165867850916; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:10:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.176.11 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:10:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <539c60b90612111210x161862e5ta013bf8025da82bf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:10:50 -0700 From: "Steve Franks" Sender: bahamasfranks@gmail.com To: "abedini@gmail.com" In-Reply-To: <000801c71d4d$834430c0$7ac5dad9@client> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <000801c71d4d$834430c0$7ac5dad9@client> X-Google-Sender-Auth: e1879dd6142abb99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: help cvs server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:34:44 -0000 I think you're missing a reply due to a lack of info from your end. I run cvsnt. It's current, stable, and cross-platform without apparent quirks. It can be found under packages/devel or ports/devel in freebsd, and cvsnt.org has windows versions. I think most native english speakers find it polite to sign your message with your name as well, unless you are restricted from doing so by your political or employment situation. Steve On 12/11/06, abedini@gmail.com wrote: > > hi all dear > > I need some help to setup cvs server whit laste update > > file in my Lan and other PC in my network use this server > > to update . which program can help my? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 20:56:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68BEF16A4A0 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:56:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from elessar@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B9E5442A0 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:34:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from elessar@bsdforen.de) Received: from localhost (mail [127.0.0.12]) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25A04241BF; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:35:12 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bsdforen.de Received: from mail.bsdforen.de ([127.0.0.12]) by localhost (mail.bsdforen.de [127.0.0.12]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IEw1XV6-+bxz; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:35:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from loki.starkstrom.lan (p57B575F1.dip.t-dialin.net [87.181.117.241]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1164241C5; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:35:01 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:34:59 +0100 From: Joerg Pernfuss To: Jerry McAllister Message-ID: <20061211213459.739348d5@loki.starkstrom.lan> In-Reply-To: <20061211191729.GA66953@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20061211191729.GA66953@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.2 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_kc8cTXwf3yJUhEyLb_NnIEJ; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, up@3.am Subject: Re: Questions re: disklabel for external USB drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:56:03 -0000 --Sig_kc8cTXwf3yJUhEyLb_NnIEJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:17:29 -0500 Jerry McAllister wrote: > > Is there an easy way to force the device to work as something like: > >=20 > > /dev/da1s1d > >=20 > > on all of the servers, including ones that do not already have a > > SCSI disk subsystem and existing /dev/da0 devices? >=20 > I think, in FreeBSD SCSI device stuff, you can force it to be > something, but I have never done it and don't know how - and since > it doesn't matter, don't see the reason to try. A imho better solution is to load the geom_label class. Then either give the device itself a label: da3s1d -> label/usbstick42s1d or set the UFS Label field of the filesystems via 'tunefs -L', this will give you for example da5s1a -> ufs/ustick5data da5s1d -> ufs/ustick5keys or whatever you set the label to, obviously. If geom_label is loaded, you have unique device names on all servers (if you don't mix things up when you label them). Regards, Joerg --=20 | /"\ ASCII ribbon | GnuPG Key ID | e86d b753 3deb e749 6c3a | | \ / campaign against | 0xbbcaad24 | 5706 1f7d 6cfd bbca ad24 | | X HTML in email | .the next sentence is true. | | / \ and news | .the previous sentence was a lie. | --Sig_kc8cTXwf3yJUhEyLb_NnIEJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFfcDzH31s/bvKrSQRAjoTAJ96usn8CteMywvnHhIu1yBYDPw4kQCbBUX0 5tcp4mzK350H/d02zraMQoo= =Pns6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_kc8cTXwf3yJUhEyLb_NnIEJ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 21:13:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94F316A49E for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:13:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C97243DAD for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:40:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (host5.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.229]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-2) with ESMTP id kBBKfKVK018947 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:41:34 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBBKetaR014903; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:41:13 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id kBBKesP4014902; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:40:54 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:40:54 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: abedini@gmail.com Message-ID: <20061211204054.GA14867@kobe.laptop> References: <000801c71d4d$834430c0$7ac5dad9@client> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000801c71d4d$834430c0$7ac5dad9@client> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.449, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.75, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: help cvs server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:13:37 -0000 On 2006-12-11 21:24, abedini@gmail.com wrote: > hi all dear > > I need some help to setup cvs server whit laste update > > file in my Lan and other PC in my network use this server > > to update . which program can help my? There are dozens of online guides which can help you set up and configure a CVS server. A quick search in Google, and a careful read of the "Info" documentation of CVS will help you a lot. Some useful online links are: http://durak.org/cvswebsites/howto-cvs/node37.html http://www.pointless.nl/~peter/stuff/cvs-server.html http://www.uta.edu/oit/how-to/docs/cvs.php http://forge.novell.com/modules/xfref_library/detail.php?reference_id=623 http://michael-amorose.com/articles/computers/cvs/index.html http://www.prima.eu.org/tobez/cvs-howto.html My favorites have always been the following two though: 1. CVSBook http://cvsbook.red-bean.com/ 2. CVS online manual http://ximbiot.com/cvs/manual/ [ especially the section 'The Repository', starting at: http://ximbiot.com/cvs/manual/cvs-1.11.22/cvs_2.html ] 3. Setting up a CVS repository - the FreeBSD way http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/cvs-freebsd/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 21:34:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8620416A50E for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:34:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C1F4421C for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:57:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBBKtdU3067583; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:55:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kBBKtdFF067582; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:55:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:55:39 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Joerg Pernfuss Message-ID: <20061211205538.GC67261@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20061211191729.GA66953@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20061211213459.739348d5@loki.starkstrom.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061211213459.739348d5@loki.starkstrom.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, up@3.am Subject: Re: Questions re: disklabel for external USB drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:34:06 -0000 On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 09:34:59PM +0100, Joerg Pernfuss wrote: > On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:17:29 -0500 > Jerry McAllister wrote: > > > > Is there an easy way to force the device to work as something like: > > > > > > /dev/da1s1d > > > > > > on all of the servers, including ones that do not already have a > > > SCSI disk subsystem and existing /dev/da0 devices? > > > > I think, in FreeBSD SCSI device stuff, you can force it to be > > something, but I have never done it and don't know how - and since > > it doesn't matter, don't see the reason to try. > > A imho better solution is to load the geom_label class. > Then either give the device itself a label: > da3s1d -> label/usbstick42s1d > or set the UFS Label field of the filesystems via 'tunefs -L', > this will give you for example > da5s1a -> ufs/ustick5data > da5s1d -> ufs/ustick5keys > > or whatever you set the label to, obviously. If geom_label is loaded, > you have unique device names on all servers (if you don't mix things > up when you label them). OK. But, that really sounds like more work than just making your fstab file relevant to the machine it is on and not worrying about the rest. ////jerry > > Regards, > Joerg > > -- > | /"\ ASCII ribbon | GnuPG Key ID | e86d b753 3deb e749 6c3a | > | \ / campaign against | 0xbbcaad24 | 5706 1f7d 6cfd bbca ad24 | > | X HTML in email | .the next sentence is true. | > | / \ and news | .the previous sentence was a lie. | From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 21:44:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4540D16A415 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:44:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nagylzs@freemail.hu) Received: from smtp.enternet.hu (smtp.enternet.hu [62.112.192.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03B643DD0 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:12:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nagylzs@freemail.hu) Received: from [80.99.172.190] (helo=[172.16.0.43]) by smtp.enternet.hu with esmtpa (Exim 4) id 1GtsTJ-000ONV-AA; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:14:01 +0100 Message-ID: <457DCA1A.3090808@freemail.hu> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:14:02 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Nagy_L=E1szl=F3_Zsolt?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Franks , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <539c60b90612111158g607f800dh862fd4d27ea5ac28@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <539c60b90612111158g607f800dh862fd4d27ea5ac28@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: easy question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:44:05 -0000 Steve Franks wrote: > I hope. Looks like xorg remaps the arrow keys for it's own uses - how > do I > get command history in an xterm instead of ctrl-key like gibberish. I'd > like to edit, like you do in a vtty with the up-arrow, not just > !!. > I'm sure the answer exists, I just can't format a seach to find it on my > own...;) Frank, what kind of keyboard are you using? The xorg server does not remap the arrow keys by default. However, if you have misconfigured your keyboard, then you might not use your arrow keys. Try to look at the documentation of xmodmap(1). If you are not sure how to change this in xorg.conf, you can first try to download an xmodmap file for your keyboard layout, and execute this command: xmodmap Then you can try to use your arrow keys. Another problem might be that you are using the wrong TERM environment variable inside your xterm. Well, this is very unlikely. You can also try this: setenv TERM xterm-color # c shell set TERM=xterm-color # bash shell export TERM I hope this will help. Best, Laszlo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 21:44:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528CA16A4D2 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:44:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from drone3.qsi.net.nz (drone3-svc-skyt.qsi.net.nz [202.89.128.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4257644F2F for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:15:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: (qmail 6600 invoked by uid 0); 11 Dec 2006 21:15:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chen.org.nz) ([202.89.146.5]) (envelope-sender ) by 0 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 Dec 2006 21:15:58 -0000 Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E569756439; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:15:57 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:15:57 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen To: Steve Franks Message-ID: <20061211211557.GA43756@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <539c60b90612111158g607f800dh862fd4d27ea5ac28@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <539c60b90612111158g607f800dh862fd4d27ea5ac28@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: easy question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:44:23 -0000 On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:58:24PM -0700, Steve Franks wrote: > I hope. Looks like xorg remaps the arrow keys for it's own uses - how do I > get command history in an xterm instead of ctrl-key like gibberish. I'd > like to edit, like you do in a vtty with the up-arrow, not just !!. > I'm sure the answer exists, I just can't format a seach to find it on my > own...;) The up-arrow in xterm with XOrg works for me when using tcsh. What shell are you using? -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Experience is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, the lesson afterwards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 21:46:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28ACE16A50D for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:46:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dead_line@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc3-s18.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc3-s18.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F27043FAA for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:18:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dead_line@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.175.17]) by bay0-omc3-s18.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:19:51 -0800 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:19:51 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.175.200 by by104fd.bay104.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:19:48 GMT X-Originating-IP: [62.150.123.112] X-Originating-Email: [dead_line@hotmail.com] X-Sender: dead_line@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: <20061210002151.GA57436@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> From: "Marwan Sultan" To: jerrymc@msu.edu Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:19:48 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Dec 2006 21:19:51.0268 (UTC) FILETIME=[182CDA40:01C71D6A] Cc: dmw@unete.cl, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: error ouput of fsck X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:46:27 -0000 Hello Jerry, I'm not responding no, the fsck -y asuming "no" ! in fact i do fsck -y then all goes auto.. regards. - Marwan > > CLEAR? no > > > >Hmmm. > RECONNECT? no > ADJUST? no > CLEAR? no >Why are you responding 'no' to each prompt to fix things? >If you keep doing that it will never get the file systems cleared up. > >////jerry > _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 21:54:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3297B16A4CA for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:54:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (ns.umpquanet.com [63.105.30.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44EC44804 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:29:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBBLUd1B072998; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:30:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: (from james@localhost) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id kBBLUdV1072997; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:30:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:30:39 -0800 From: James Long To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Valen Jones Message-ID: <20061211213039.GA69273@ns.umpquanet.com> References: <20061211120032.5DFBA16A611@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061211120032.5DFBA16A611@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: Subject: Re: Major Version Upgrade - 4.11 to 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:54:09 -0000 On Sunday 10 December 2006 15:41, Valen Jones wrote: > I'm interested in upgrading from 4.11 to 5.x. I currently track 4.x > stable using cvsup, but I've never done a major version upgrade. > > First, should I bother? My hardware has dual pentium 1.13 processors > with 1G ram (I'm considering maxing it out at 4). I host a few domains > on this machine and I have four jails configured on it which will have > to be upgraded too. I have users counting particularly on mail service > not being down for too long. > > Other than the obvious advice to start with a good backup, can anyone > tell me: > > 1) Will I gain a major benefit from upgrading > > 2) Where should I look for instructions / advice on upgrading > > 3) Also any general advice from personal experience. Beech's advice is sound. I would stress that the simplest and easiest by far is indeed a clean install. And take two backups, if you have customers counting on things going right. Make sure your backups are readable, usable and complete (no bad spots on tape media, no files inadvertently omitted, etc.). If at all possible, leave the production system running and begin the new installation on separate hardware. If you have a fast new machine to migrate onto, do that. However your current hardware sounds adequate for the light load you describe. If you have just a spare machine of nearly the same horsepower and configuration, you could do the new installation on the spare machine, get it configured and tested, and then backup the old machine twice, wipe the drive and re-partition, and then transfer the newly-built configuration onto your production hardware. Watch out for /etc/fstab gotchas, like if the test machine has an ad0 ATA drive and the production is da0 SCSI. This will allow you to do a lot of migration, testing and tweaking off-line, without your customers noticing much downtime, except for the final changeover. How current are your installed ports? Review the ports you do have installed, and see whether you're really still using them. It will save you a little time on the new machine by not having to build ports you don't really need anymore. Look at your key applications, and where there are significant version changes between what you're running and what's current, familiarize yourself with the upgrade issues (if any) that each port presents. Be prepared to test any new features you hope to use, or to regression test to make sure that legacy functionality still works the way you expect. This might be the time to switch to Apache 2, for example, if you want to. But some things that worked under 1.3 will have to be adjusted to work under 2. At the least, it would be good to upgrade to the latest 1.3.x, to use Apache as an example. As for #3, I have grown fond of using a FreesBIE or other live CD for steps like booting the migration/test box to create a backup image of the new 6.X filesystem, and then also to boot the production box for the final changeover to transfer that backup image onto the production disk. That way your file system in an off-line (inactive) state, where you can cleanly backup the old production filesystem (twice!), then wipe and re-partition, and transfer the new configuration image onto the production drive likewise in a clean state. If you haven't already, spend some time just experimenting on a test machine, and make friends with FreesBIE and/or the Fixit live CD mode of FreeBSD installation media. Good luck! Jim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 22:05:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3EB16A412 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:05:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CCDA43DFC for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:43:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBBLfcxJ067786; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:41:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kBBLfcn7067784; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:41:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:41:38 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Marwan Sultan Message-ID: <20061211214138.GA67766@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20061210002151.GA57436@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: dmw@unete.cl, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: error ouput of fsck X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:05:20 -0000 On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 09:19:48PM +0000, Marwan Sultan wrote: > Hello Jerry, > > I'm not responding no, the fsck -y asuming "no" ! > in fact i do fsck -y then all goes auto.. Hmmm. I don't know what is happening then. ////jerry > > regards. > > - Marwan > > >> CLEAR? no > >> > > > >Hmmm. > > RECONNECT? no > > ADJUST? no > > CLEAR? no > >Why are you responding 'no' to each prompt to fix things? > >If you keep doing that it will never get the file systems cleared up. > > > >////jerry > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 22:07:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0754E16A4D4 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:07:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045504400E for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:46:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBBKDpgA005755 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:13:51 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBBKDpcw022758 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:13:51 -0800 Message-ID: <457DBBFE.5010900@u.washington.edu> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:13:50 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20061211184333.GA16342@host.my.domain> In-Reply-To: <20061211184333.GA16342@host.my.domain> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2006.12.11.115933 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: What is microsoft-ds port 445? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:07:39 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 a@zeos.net wrote: > What is microsoft-ds port #445? > > Elisej Babenko Next time, please google. There are a plethora of documents on this topic. See for starters. - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFfbv+6CkrZkzMC68RAl6aAJ9V5lgDY+3d9GO4A0YOLgdPey9JdQCfYYwC BY8v5XeyeTblmFhmTYgO3XQ= =PP6L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 22:12:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FDFC16A593 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:12:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ne.bahn@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015EC44322 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:54:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ne.bahn@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so1569012wxc for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:55:09 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=P5r7VLauMbJE03Cr69oIWVCJt2Vraormqo0cKJFQuMGQvbr/B0zjBdZAF2jZw4BO2KxaoYW/Ksg8wVeyUdDahM+94FftJ85RtMdifRSfbwXfK7tuzxxdUezDz6OUtisByvzMExrp2t+HDcV6XIOF46d3wkJwUtkLtfFtOfIwhVw= Received: by 10.70.8.20 with SMTP id 20mr13132049wxh.1165874109268; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:55:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from bloodlust ( [69.60.116.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h10sm5591204wxd.2006.12.11.13.55.02; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:55:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <001601c71d6e$f09c9470$09d3dcc9@bloodlust> From: "Ne'Bahn" To: "UNIX - questions" Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:38:55 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: Fonts on X.Org... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:12:37 -0000 Hi list, how can I add some fonts to the system, for instance: Arial, Courier New, and so others. I know there are some fonts that cost to acquire them, but isn't an implementation of these fonts for the open source arena ??? PS: I've some docs made in a Windows environment that use fonts I don't have on FreeBSD, the replacement is very bad, so OpenOffice offers system fonts rather than their fonts (if it has a set), a problem for portability/compatibility but indeed better for availability. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 22:16:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E1E16A4D4 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:16:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (ns.umpquanet.com [63.105.30.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4FD14409E for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:07:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBBM91XL077378; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:09:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: (from james@localhost) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id kBBM91Zx077366; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:09:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:09:01 -0800 From: James Long To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, listvj Message-ID: <20061211220901.GB69273@ns.umpquanet.com> References: <20061211185718.E5F0616A56A@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061211185718.E5F0616A56A@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: Subject: Re: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:16:18 -0000 > Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:26:02 -0500 > From: listvj > Subject: Re: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <457DBEDA.6040908@summerhost.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Btw, I'm sorry for posting this question twice. I posted the first one > with the wrong email address. I was surprised (and disappointed) to see > that the list accepted it as I did not subscribe to the list with that > address. :( Why are you disappointed that the list accepts email from anyone who needs FreeBSD support? Personally, I dislike some of the lists where you have to "join the club" before you can ask a question to receive support. By the way, that is why it is customary to Cc: both the person and and the list when replying. It doesn't do any good to send a response to the list if the person who asked the question isn't subscribed. Jim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 22:17:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6146016A68B for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:17:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6617143CE9 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:14:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:15:06 -0500 id 00056410.457DD86A.0000038E Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:15:06 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20061211171506.97949c7e.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: shmmax tops out at 2G? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:17:51 -0000 uname -a FreeBSD db00.lab00 6.2-BETA3 FreeBSD 6.2-BETA3 #1: Fri Dec 8 09:27:37 EST 2006 root@db00.lab00:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DB-2850-amd64 amd64 sysctl kern.ipc.shmmax=2200000000 kern.ipc.shmmax: 2100000000 -> -2094967296 Looks like an unsigned 32-bit int. That doesn't seem to scale as well as would be expected on 64-bit arch. Is this a mistake, or intentional? I'm working with some big memory systems, and I sure would like to allocate more than 2G for PostgreSQL to use ... -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 22:33:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A529416A403 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:33:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from bcmelmx.bytecraft.au.com (bcmelmx.bytecraft.au.com [203.39.118.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74AF43F63 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:28:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from svmarshal2.bytecraft.internal (svmarshal2.bytecraft.internal [10.0.0.3]) by bcmelmx.bytecraft.au.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kBBMTX10053662; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:29:33 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from svmailmel.bytecraft.internal (Not Verified[10.0.0.24]) by svmarshal2.bytecraft.internal with MailMarshal (v6, 1, 4, 441) id ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:29:24 +1100 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:29:23 +1100 Message-ID: <04E232FDCD9FBE43857F7066CAD3C0F1266DD9@svmailmel.bytecraft.internal> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: "dd" mini-iso image to USB pendrive? thread-index: AccdW1DKeA6vXkczRE668p8imBzteQAGCdVw From: "Murray Taylor" To: "Bill-Schoolcraft" , Cc: Subject: RE: "dd" mini-iso image to USB pendrive? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:33:49 -0000 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=20 > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of=20 > Bill-Schoolcraft > Sent: Tuesday, 12 December 2006 6:19 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: "dd" mini-iso image to USB pendrive? >=20 > Hello Family, >=20 > I'm trying to get my server to boot off my Sandisk "Cruzer" 1-gig pen > drive with an ISO image dd'd to the pendrive. >=20 > It fails and the same ISO image will boot off the USB CDROM with no > issues. >=20 > Is there any specific howto on doing this? >=20 > TIA >=20 > --=20 > Bill Schoolcraft <*> http://wiliweld.com >=20 > "Health nuts are going to feel stupid someday, > lying in hospitals dying of nothing." > -- Redd Foxx >=20 Try the minibsd sites for more info as they=20 target building bootable flash images.... 4.X https://neon1.net/misc/minibsd.html 5.X http://www.ultradesic.com/index.php?section=3D86 6.X http://www.ultradesic.com/index.php?section=3D125 HTH mjt --------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted in this e-mail is for the exclusive use of the intended addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of it, or the taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons and/or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please inform the sender and/or addressee immediately and delete the material.=20 E-mails may not be secure, may contain computer viruses and may be corrupted in transmission. Please carefully check this e-mail (and any attachment) accordingly. No warranties are given and no liability is accepted for any loss or damage caused by such matters. --------------------------------------------------------------- ### This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses by Bytecraft ### From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 22:44:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC0C16A47B for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:44:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28DA0440A2 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:36:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBBMbFJJ025942 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:37:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id kBBMbF9a025939 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:37:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:37:14 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061211233003.M25582@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: squid: no buffer space available - after tuning! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:44:48 -0000 average loaded site (about 1000 users), fast machine, lots of ram, fxp interfaces (no realteks), squid reports 32768 filedescriptors available [root@w3cache ~]# limits -U squid Resource limits for class squid: cputime infinity secs filesize infinity kB datasize infinity kB stacksize infinity kB coredumpsize 0 kB memoryuse infinity kB memorylocked infinity kB maxprocesses 64 openfiles 32768 sbsize infinity bytes vmemoryuse infinity kB [ /etc/sysctl.conf: kern.ipc.somaxconn=65535 kern.ipc.nmbclusters=32768 net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0 net.inet.icmp.icmplim=500 vm.defer_swapspace_pageouts=1 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=65536 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=65536 kern.ipc.shmseg=128 kern.ipc.shmall=16384 kern.maxfiles=65536 kern.maxfilesperproc=32768 kern.ipc.nmbclusters=131072 net.inet.ip.portrange.last=65535 vfs.lorunningspace=3145728 vfs.hirunningspace=6291456 net.inet.tcp.msl=5000 vfs.root.mountfrom="ufs:ad0a" kern.cam.scsi_delay="1000" kern.ipc.msgseg=1024 kern.ipc.msgssz=128 kern.ipc.msgtql=8192 kern.ipc.msgmnb=65536 kern.ipc.msgmni=100 kern.ipc.msgmax=8192 kern.maxproc=1000 kern.maxbcache=134217728 kern.dfldsiz=2147483648 kern.maxdsiz=2147483648 in dmesg i found lots of ipfw: pullup failed CPU load is always <10%, it's P4 machine with 2GB ram (much more than squid uses) running FreeBSD 6.2-RC1, 3 interfaces - out output, 2 for different connections, ipfw is used with only 1 line. any more ideas? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 22:46:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B193316A412 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:46:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from listvj@summerhost.net) Received: from mail.summerhost.net (mail.summerhost.net [64.106.242.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BDE143EC0 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:36:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from listvj@summerhost.net) Received: from [192.168.1.151] (x403b0a02.ip.e-nt.net [64.59.10.2]) by mail.summerhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5892CF4B85; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:38:02 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <457DDFA7.5030803@summerhost.net> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:45:59 -0500 From: listvj User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Long References: <20061211185718.E5F0616A56A@hub.freebsd.org> <20061211220901.GB69273@ns.umpquanet.com> In-Reply-To: <20061211220901.GB69273@ns.umpquanet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:46:40 -0000 James Long wrote: >>Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:26:02 -0500 >>From: listvj >>Subject: Re: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x >>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>Message-ID: <457DBEDA.6040908@summerhost.net> >>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >> >>Btw, I'm sorry for posting this question twice. I posted the first one >>with the wrong email address. I was surprised (and disappointed) to see >>that the list accepted it as I did not subscribe to the list with that >>address. :( >> >> > >Why are you disappointed that the list accepts email from anyone who >needs FreeBSD support? Personally, I dislike some of the lists where >you have to "join the club" before you can ask a question to receive >support. > >By the way, that is why it is customary to Cc: both the person and >and the list when replying. It doesn't do any good to send a response >to the list if the person who asked the question isn't subscribed. > > >Jim >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Thanks for the clarification. I'm not disappointed in the list's policies. I'm disappointed that I didn't know what they were and that I wasn't a bit more careful with my email addresses. I'm sure the information about how the list works is posted somewhere and I just didn't read it. Oh well. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 22:58:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E859016A524 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:58:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54E643DB9 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:56:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin05-en2 [10.13.10.150]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout05/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kBBMw51i004400; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:58:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from [17.214.13.96] (a17-214-13-96.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin05/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kBBMw3lX020233; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:58:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20061211233003.M25582@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20061211233003.M25582@chylonia.3miasto.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <07BACED5-D675-4D08-84C8-716ED22F99D0@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:58:02 -0800 To: Wojciech Puchar X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-scanned: yes Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: squid: no buffer space available - after tuning! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:58:58 -0000 On Dec 11, 2006, at 2:37 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > in dmesg i found lots of > > ipfw: pullup failed > > CPU load is always <10%, it's P4 machine with 2GB ram (much more > than squid uses) running FreeBSD 6.2-RC1, 3 interfaces - out > output, 2 for different connections, ipfw is used with only 1 line. The IPFW message implies that you are seeing low-level network problems with truncated packets. What does "netstat -i" and -s reveal, and, if possible, do you have any switch-based statistics...? -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 22:59:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9EF16A598 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:59:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428E943CAA for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:57:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so1582813wxc for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:59:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.29.2 with SMTP id c2mr7693257agc.1165877946042; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:59:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 26sm6583104aga.2006.12.11.14.59.05; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:59:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D75B85F; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:59:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (boss.seibercom.net [192.168.0.4]) (Authenticated sender: gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F606B82C; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:59:03 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:59:11 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: User Questions Organization: Seibercom.NET In-Reply-To: <20061211220901.GB69273@ns.umpquanet.com> References: <20061211185718.E5F0616A56A@hub.freebsd.org> <20061211220901.GB69273@ns.umpquanet.com> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20061211175301.17B7.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.29 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: User Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:59:10 -0000 On Monday December 11, 2006 at 05:09:01 (PM) James Long wrote: > By the way, that is why it is customary to Cc: both the person and > and the list when replying. It doesn't do any good to send a response > to the list if the person who asked the question isn't subscribed. Maybe it is just me, but I hate that Cc crap. I always end up with two copies of the same message. Unless the individual specifically requests to be Cc'd, I never utilize it. Besides, how hard is it to subscribe to a list, post your question and hopefully receive a satisfactory response and then terminate your association with the list if you are so inclined. I joined the 'Apache' forum just to get one simple answer, then exited. Not a big deal at all. Just my 2¢. -- Gerard "When in doubt, cop an attitude." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 23:09:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD22616A416 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:09:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from ext-gw.lemis.com (ext-gw.lemis.com [150.101.14.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BEBC43CA9 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:08:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by ext-gw.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6AB21334FA; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:39:22 +1030 (CST) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id B45689BD94; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:39:22 +1030 (CST) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:39:22 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Chuck Swiger , Garrett Cooper Message-ID: <20061211230922.GM34082@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20061211184333.GA16342@host.my.domain> <457DBBFE.5010900@u.washington.edu> <20061211184333.GA16342@host.my.domain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="m+utxuhC6KVTvgNz" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <457DBBFE.5010900@u.washington.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 VoIP: sip:0871270137@sip.internode.on.net WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Cc: a@zeos.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is microsoft-ds port 445? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:09:24 -0000 --m+utxuhC6KVTvgNz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Monday, 11 December 2006 at 11:06:12 -0800, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Dec 11, 2006, at 10:43 AM, a@zeos.net wrote: >> What is microsoft-ds port #445? > > Mildly off-topic for this list, but it's used by directory-services, > aka "Active Directory".... I don't know that it's that off-topic. I don't use Microsoft, but people bombard me with packets on port 445. Of course, the way to find this out is: $ grep 445 /etc/services microsoft-ds 445/tcp microsoft-ds 445/udp $ On Monday, 11 December 2006 at 12:13:50 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > Next time, please google. There are a plethora of documents on this topic. > See for > starters. You can find lots of things on Google, including false leads and (especially) other people asking the same question. Many of them (hopefully not the false leads) refer to messages that have gone by on this list. Come back tomorrow and you'll probably find this exchange there. In summary: I think this message was on-topic. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --m+utxuhC6KVTvgNz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFfeUiIubykFB6QiMRAoi2AKCztqfEG1y8/GLrxLExwp9KoPHAwQCgp5wH HDE58JO1IsWEXOzir4onGxA= =kK/E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --m+utxuhC6KVTvgNz-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 23:20:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A12F216A4D0 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:20:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amed2209@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D6B43CCA for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:18:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from amed2209@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so861187nzh for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:20:07 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index:x-mimeole:message-id; b=XDc+JNXYoGvD2PHEdV08M5S5Lm4KLPPFMA/7zJTns5p94c5G6jZs470LCEnXZA1y4Wib9Khto9XolUcD+AHWUWwOoVa0ATGWwlEVZOUZHbn4g1bSvz0R6EUwkjeFk3gMGS5r4K66cElEmlQtyCXXk86kFK6HhpOkl1aOsJvCswQ= Received: by 10.64.243.10 with SMTP id q10mr5018448qbh.1165879206985; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:20:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from Computer1 ( [200.55.166.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q14sm7222678qbq.2006.12.11.15.19.40; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:20:06 -0800 (PST) From: "Amed Miranda" To: Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:18:23 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AccchRJ3wSIlb4RoQPOu5+SWrleHjg== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Message-ID: <457de7a6.4f06c5cf.6595.1efc@mx.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: onboard sound crard on intel D915GAG X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:20:36 -0000 envienme los driver de la Intel d915GAG From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 23:24:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94CB216A415 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:24:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@budostore.de) Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de (mo-p00-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DBD543DAA for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:22:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from news@budostore.de) Received: from nor75-5-82-235-173-77.fbx.proxad.net (nor75-5-82-235-173-77.fbx.proxad.net [82.235.173.77]) by post.webmailer.de (mrclete mo48) (RZmta 3.9) with ESMTP id iBBK7WGF010edI for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:22:56 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:22:56 +0100 (MET) From: Karl Sinn To: User Questions User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200612111827.54061.news@budostore.de> <20061211125628.D0C0.GERARD@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20061211125628.D0C0.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612120015.30099.news@budostore.de> X-RZG-AUTH: ibDpgOm8RLcSc5zBxTj4 Subject: Re: trying to install jre X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:24:15 -0000 Hi, Am Montag, 11. Dezember 2006 18:58 schrieb Gerard Seibert: > I have /usr/ports/java/diablo-jre15 in my ports collection. When was the > last time you updated the ports? Actually I did it this morning, but there seems to be a problem. Now I deleted everything and I did portsnap extract. Now I can find some new ports. But still the jre is not building with the same error message. Now I try diablo-jre-1.5. I hope it will work. I'll send a message when it's done. Thanks Karl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 23:33:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE1616A412 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:33:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@budostore.de) Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de (mo-p00-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F3943D98 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:28:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from news@budostore.de) Received: from nor75-5-82-235-173-77.fbx.proxad.net (nor75-5-82-235-173-77.fbx.proxad.net [82.235.173.77]) by post.webmailer.de (klopstock mo59) (RZmta 3.9) with ESMTP id iBBL6e1305a95K for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:29:14 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:29:14 +0100 (MET) From: Karl Sinn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612120021.49738.news@budostore.de> X-RZG-AUTH: ibDpgOm8RLcSc5zBxTj4 Subject: mount USB-Device X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:33:26 -0000 Hi, I would like to use one of my USB-MP3-Players. I plug it in and I can see with dmesg that the device is recognised by the kernel. "mount /dev/da0 /mnt " gives an error message: incorrect superblock. "mount -t fat /dev/da0 /mnt" gives an error message that mount_fat is not found in "/usr/sbin" I find only mout_* for nwfs, portalfs and smbfs. 1) Where are the other filesystem mounts? 2) do I have to give another device name like da0s1? 3) Is there something like automount? Thanks Karl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 23:44:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3985016A494 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:44:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Russell.Wood@rac.com.au) Received: from maserati.rac.com.au (maserati.rac.com.au [61.88.37.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7FA943CA2 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:42:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Russell.Wood@rac.com.au) Received: from mazda.rac.com.au ([172.16.5.50]) by audi.rac.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:43:19 +0900 Received: from mercury.rac.com.au ([172.16.5.42]) by mazda.rac.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:43:18 +0900 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2757 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:43:18 +0900 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Importance: normal Priority: normal Thread-Topic: mount USB-Device thread-index: AccdfUuZal36TJTiQReK98hjQ/GrZQAAL4uQ From: "Wood, Russell" To: "Karl Sinn" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Dec 2006 23:43:18.0978 (UTC) FILETIME=[22C52A20:01C71D7E] Cc: Subject: RE: mount USB-Device X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:44:05 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Karl Sinn > Sent: Tuesday, 12 December 2006 8:29 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: mount USB-Device >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I would like to use one of my USB-MP3-Players. >=20 > I plug it in and I can see with dmesg that the device is recognised by the > kernel. >=20 > "mount /dev/da0 /mnt " gives an error message: incorrect superblock. > "mount -t fat /dev/da0 /mnt" gives an error message that mount_fat is not > found >=20 > in "/usr/sbin" I find only mout_* for nwfs, portalfs and smbfs. >=20 > 1) Where are the other filesystem mounts? > 2) do I have to give another device name like da0s1? > 3) Is there something like automount? >=20 > Thanks > Karl Try: mount -t msdos /dev/da0 /mnt Regards, Russell Wood DISCLAIMER: Disclaimer. This e-mail is private and confidential. If you are not the = intended recipient, please advise us by return e-mail immediately, and = delete the e-mail and any attachments without using or disclosing the = contents in any way. The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the = author, and do not represent those of this company unless this is = clearly indicated. You should scan this e-mail and any attachments for = viruses. This company accepts no liability for any direct or indirect = damage or loss resulting from the use of any attachments to this e-mail. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 23:45:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876CD16A415 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:45:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Russell.Wood@rac.com.au) Received: from maserati.rac.com.au (maserati.rac.com.au [61.88.37.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DA443CB6 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:44:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Russell.Wood@rac.com.au) Received: from mazda.rac.com.au ([172.16.5.50]) by audi.rac.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:45:22 +0900 Received: from mercury.rac.com.au ([172.16.5.42]) by mazda.rac.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:45:22 +0900 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2757 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:45:21 +0900 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Importance: normal Priority: normal Thread-Topic: onboard sound card on Intel D915GAG thread-index: AccchRJ3wSIlb4RoQPOu5+SWrleHjgA+SYSw From: "Wood, Russell" To: "Amed Miranda" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Dec 2006 23:45:22.0162 (UTC) FILETIME=[6C318D20:01C71D7E] Cc: Subject: RE: onboard sound card on Intel D915GAG X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:45:37 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Amed Miranda > Sent: Tuesday, 12 December 2006 9:18 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: onboard sound crard on intel D915GAG >=20 > envienme los driver de la Intel d915GAG I have no idea what you asked, but I'm assuming you'd like to get sound working for that chipset. Try (from memory): kldload sound That'll load all sound drives and whichever attaches is the drive you want. Regards, Russell Wood DISCLAIMER: Disclaimer. This e-mail is private and confidential. If you are not the = intended recipient, please advise us by return e-mail immediately, and = delete the e-mail and any attachments without using or disclosing the = contents in any way. The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the = author, and do not represent those of this company unless this is = clearly indicated. You should scan this e-mail and any attachments for = viruses. This company accepts no liability for any direct or indirect = damage or loss resulting from the use of any attachments to this e-mail. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 23:52:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C18A16A407 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:52:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from walkingshadow@grummel.net) Received: from mail1.bytemine.net (mat.bytemine.net [193.41.144.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A5543CD0 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:50:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from walkingshadow@grummel.net) Received: from 4be54-4-82-234-154-189.fbx.proxad.net ([82.234.154.189]:37948 helo=mailsvr.my.domain) by mail1.bytemine.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GtuvP-00043O-47; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:51:11 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailsvr.my.domain (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE91F456DA; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:51:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailsvr.my.domain ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailsvr.my.domain [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22485-03-4; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:50:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.0.11]) by mailsvr.my.domain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A083456D2; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:49:40 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:49:35 +0100 From: Jona Joachim To: Karl Sinn Message-ID: <20061212004935.078023cb@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200612120021.49738.news@budostore.de> References: <200612120021.49738.news@budostore.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-Face: &>dujC`JZV!}?Y^1"%N{x!f+rW}; PX\_Cg[!|MA~tn3ebIKM|~p=,,U~YJt,Exd`Spk.1Ln zg, Q]0=:!/LTs-eg.Fz, @giLyD'D=s, L\-AJyZ8tcV`kPifedMA@rhoEikoo~K%@iDLNq2?aHZjIt) GqBY7o#9+8j/uuXDVG3`XFEH_4$T%._*%;|vIaP Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at my.domain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mount USB-Device X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:52:05 -0000 On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:29:14 +0100 (MET) Karl Sinn wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to use one of my USB-MP3-Players. > > I plug it in and I can see with dmesg that the device is recognised > by the kernel. > > "mount /dev/da0 /mnt " gives an error message: incorrect superblock. > "mount -t fat /dev/da0 /mnt" gives an error message that mount_fat is > not found try with msdosfs instead of fat. Jona From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 00:00:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB99216A501; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:00:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738C043CCA; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:56:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin05-en2 [10.13.10.150]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout07/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kBBNvqpK011972; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:57:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from [17.214.13.96] (a17-214-13-96.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin05/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kBBNvkbA013667; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:57:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20061211230922.GM34082@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20061211184333.GA16342@host.my.domain> <457DBBFE.5010900@u.washington.edu> <20061211184333.GA16342@host.my.domain> <20061211230922.GM34082@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <982C6A03-357C-4B6B-8AF8-3027AA82786F@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:57:45 -0800 To: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-scanned: yes Cc: Garrett Cooper , a@zeos.net, freeBSD List Subject: Re: What is microsoft-ds port 445? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:00:44 -0000 On Dec 11, 2006, at 3:09 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Monday, 11 December 2006 at 11:06:12 -0800, Chuck Swiger wrote: >> On Dec 11, 2006, at 10:43 AM, a@zeos.net wrote: >>> What is microsoft-ds port #445? >> >> Mildly off-topic for this list, but it's used by directory-services, >> aka "Active Directory".... > > I don't know that it's that off-topic. A question which is independent of which OS you might use may still be relevant to a FreeBSD mailing list, but it does not seem to be highly relevant. A security list such as BugTraq or firewall-wizards is likely to provide more specific details or feedback about bursts of malware traffic on a particular port than freebsd-questions will... > I don't use Microsoft, but people bombard me with packets on port 445. Agreed-- it is certainly true that port 445 experiences lots of malicious probes. I run a honeynet which gets between 500 and 1000 connection requests per day per IP on port 445; a histogram of TCP traffic over the past week suggests it is the most commonly targeted port, closely followed by 139/tcp: # count / port 59676 445 58527 139 1043 9988 383 80 357 135 285 22 223 5900 214 1433 182 4899 144 1080 > Of course, the way to find this out is: > > $ grep 445 /etc/services > microsoft-ds 445/tcp > microsoft-ds 445/udp It seems likely that the original poster had gotten this far, judging from the question above. :-) Dear a@zeos.net: port 445/tcp is used to wrap a bunch of services that used to run over the NetBIOS/NetBEUI protocol, such as "domain browse lists", "network neighborhood", and CIFS/SMB services (ie, what Samba provides, workgroups, filesharing, user authentication)-- in short, "directory services". -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 00:39:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C6216A47C for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:39:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (mail.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9104343ED8 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:23:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.171.127.191] (helo=[192.168.99.232]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.51) id 1GtvS6-000I3M-36 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:24:58 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <20061211175301.17B7.GERARD@seibercom.net> References: <20061211185718.E5F0616A56A@hub.freebsd.org> <20061211220901.GB69273@ns.umpquanet.com> <20061211175301.17B7.GERARD@seibercom.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-355-744819655; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Message-Id: <5A4918D2-24B4-4786-B17C-8C77BB9547CD@shire.net> From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:24:56 -0700 To: User Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.171.127.191 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:39:16 -0000 --Apple-Mail-355-744819655 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Dec 11, 2006, at 3:59 PM, Gerard Seibert wrote: > On Monday December 11, 2006 at 05:09:01 (PM) James Long wrote: > > >> By the way, that is why it is customary to Cc: both the person and >> and the list when replying. It doesn't do any good to send a >> response >> to the list if the person who asked the question isn't subscribed. > > Maybe it is just me, but I hate that Cc crap. I always end up with two > copies of the same message. Unless the individual specifically > requests > to be Cc'd, I never utilize it. Besides, how hard is it to > subscribe to > a list, post your question and hopefully receive a satisfactory > response and then terminate your association with the list if you > are so > inclined. I joined the 'Apache' forum just to get one simple answer, > then exited. Not a big deal at all. I agree that the list should only accept mail from subscribed members. Mainly to keep spam and other crap off the list. Most lists I am on (which are technical) require you to be a list member to post. So in this case the FreeBSD policies are "not the norm." I am on one list for an MTA where if you CC the orig poster plus send to the list you get in trouble with some folks. Chad --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net --Apple-Mail-355-744819655-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 00:48:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8915716A494 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:48:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nb_root@videotron.ca) Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B451143CA4 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:46:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nb_root@videotron.ca) Received: from clk01a ([24.202.77.103]) by VL-MH-MR001.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JA400FPPY7AZAA0@VL-MH-MR001.ip.videotron.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:47:35 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:47:21 -0500 From: Nicolas Blais To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <200612111947.34413.nb_root@videotron.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary=nextPart2082243.zHI6P3CTTN; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 Subject: FreeBSD FAMP on a mini-itx/embedded platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:48:01 -0000 --nextPart2082243.zHI6P3CTTN Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, I'm looking to make a light FreeBSD-Apache-MySQL-PHP system out of a VIA EN= =20 5000 system. It would replace my home file/web server which currently runs= =20 24h/7d with a silent and energy-wise bundle.=20 I would also like to take advange of the C7 processor's Padlock feature (SS= L=20 encryption). I believe FreeBSD supports it? I'm not looking for 3D performance or the such for this file server, but I= =20 would expect it to atleast keep up with the current server network-wise. Ar= e=20 my expectations unfounded? Does anyone here run FreeBSD on a VIA EN system or other embedded C7-based= =20 machine? Thanks! Nicolas sidenote: This would be my 7th BSD machine in the house (and this is not=20 counting my Vmware guests!) :) =2D-=20 =46reeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #12: Sat Dec 2 12:30:58 EST 2006 =20 root@clk01a:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CLK01A=20 PGP? : http://www.clkroot.net/security/nb_root.asc --nextPart2082243.zHI6P3CTTN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFffwm4wTBlvcsbJURAufxAJ405VRoXlUyGE37sTL1TTGkuutY5ACgtATG cRgKoUwBr/9RwBlTqYvX6Y0= =UTE+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2082243.zHI6P3CTTN-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 00:52:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5735816A407 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:52:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37FB243D45 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:50:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GtvrX-0003W7-Rh for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:51:16 -0500 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost.localnet.local [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kBC0rlaO056288 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:53:47 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id kBC0rlDj056285 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:53:47 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:53:46 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061211185718.E5F0616A56A@hub.freebsd.org> <20061211175301.17B7.GERARD@seibercom.net> <5A4918D2-24B4-4786-B17C-8C77BB9547CD@shire.net> In-Reply-To: <5A4918D2-24B4-4786-B17C-8C77BB9547CD@shire.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612111853.46968.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79ba9e7bd79be7cecac38c2fc701264d58350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Re: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:52:31 -0000 On Monday 11 December 2006 18:24, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > On Dec 11, 2006, at 3:59 PM, Gerard Seibert wrote: > > On Monday December 11, 2006 at 05:09:01 (PM) James Long wrote: > >> By the way, that is why it is customary to Cc: both the person and > >> and the list when replying. It doesn't do any good to send a > >> response > >> to the list if the person who asked the question isn't subscribed. > > > > Maybe it is just me, but I hate that Cc crap. I always end up with two > > copies of the same message. Unless the individual specifically > > requests > > to be Cc'd, I never utilize it. Besides, how hard is it to > > subscribe to > > a list, post your question and hopefully receive a satisfactory > > response and then terminate your association with the list if you > > are so > > inclined. I joined the 'Apache' forum just to get one simple answer, > > then exited. Not a big deal at all. > > I agree that the list should only accept mail from subscribed > members. Mainly to keep spam and other crap off the list. Most > lists I am on (which are technical) require you to be a list member > to post. So in this case the FreeBSD policies are "not the norm." I > am on one list for an MTA where if you CC the orig poster plus send > to the list you get in trouble with some folks. > > Chad > > --- > Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC > Your Web App and Email hosting provider > chad at shire.net I dunno, Chad. I get some of my best Pharmaceuticals from SPAM posted to this list .... just kidding, of course. But the SPAM on questions- is minimal, and the trade-off is, I think, huge. While many of us track the list regularly, there are much more that just toss a question out, and then google the replies. I think, in terms of server load, it probably is better this way. Not to mention that it is more convenient for the questioners, and thus better for the larger FreeBSD community. I'm not claiming to be "right," this is just my opinion, my stinky opinion. lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 01:08:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0FC16A4AB for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:08:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.235]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E10B43E28 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:03:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so874127nzh for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:05:05 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=SACw2/89DmmfW+uJZ/DItCpticS2lFFFmgDsdVISy0LS2e6pxSCPuB7/96fMisv9qoGxwcwRxXVmUQ3FmdxpYCCQpQEtf8OJd93bAwSqM5mQ9J2NE7ebv2d/pKuQQPaiITUpdZfwJpQ4bokLFVHOTIjkkq2HIUMXQWsxybzqCQ0= Received: by 10.65.192.16 with SMTP id u16mr12021990qbp.1165885504945; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:05:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.75.14 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:05:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <17489c7a0612111705p604515efq2371aac614d6ccd6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:05:04 -0500 From: "Chad Gross" To: "James Long" In-Reply-To: <20061211213039.GA69273@ns.umpquanet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061211120032.5DFBA16A611@hub.freebsd.org> <20061211213039.GA69273@ns.umpquanet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Valen Jones Subject: Re: Major Version Upgrade - 4.11 to 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:08:30 -0000 First I would address the first question. Only you can really answer whether or not there is a benefit. Is there a specific need (e.g. software/hardware support) for you to upgrade? If not then I would recommend against the upgrade. If yes, I why not move to 6.x? I have been running FBSD since 4.0and have run every revision since and would not suggest using 5.x. Either stick with 4.x or move to 6.x based on your requirements. To answer your second question, the best place to look for help is the handbook ( http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html). Also make sure to read /usr/src/UPDATING as this may contain special instructions. It is a general rule of thumb to do a clean install between major revisions though. I have personally done them with success, but would not recommend doing it on a production server if it is your first time doing one (as it sounds to be). Stick to upgrading between minor revisions until you are familiar with the build/make process. Also these mailing lists are a great resource for help as is http://www.bsdforums.org/ (and a few others, use Google). Finally, as mentioned above, from personal experience it is best to stick with a clean install between major revisions. Good luck again, Chad On 12/11/06, James Long wrote: > > On Sunday 10 December 2006 15:41, Valen Jones wrote: > > I'm interested in upgrading from 4.11 to 5.x. I currently track 4.x > > stable using cvsup, but I've never done a major version upgrade. > > > > First, should I bother? My hardware has dual pentium 1.13 processors > > with 1G ram (I'm considering maxing it out at 4). I host a few domains > > on this machine and I have four jails configured on it which will have > > to be upgraded too. I have users counting particularly on mail service > > not being down for too long. > > > > Other than the obvious advice to start with a good backup, can anyone > > tell me: > > > > 1) Will I gain a major benefit from upgrading > > > > 2) Where should I look for instructions / advice on upgrading > > > > 3) Also any general advice from personal experience. > > Beech's advice is sound. I would stress that the simplest and easiest > by far is indeed a clean install. And take two backups, if you have > customers counting on things going right. Make sure your backups are > readable, usable and complete (no bad spots on tape media, no files > inadvertently omitted, etc.). > > If at all possible, leave the production system running and begin the > new installation on separate hardware. If you have a fast new machine > to migrate onto, do that. However your current hardware sounds > adequate for the light load you describe. If you have just a spare > machine of nearly the same horsepower and configuration, you could > do the new installation on the spare machine, get it configured and > tested, and then backup the old machine twice, wipe the drive and > re-partition, and then transfer the newly-built configuration onto > your production hardware. Watch out for /etc/fstab gotchas, like if > the test machine has an ad0 ATA drive and the production is da0 SCSI. > > This will allow you to do a lot of migration, testing and tweaking > off-line, without your customers noticing much downtime, except for > the final changeover. > > How current are your installed ports? Review the ports you do have > installed, and see whether you're really still using them. It will > save you a little time on the new machine by not having to build > ports you don't really need anymore. Look at your key applications, > and where there are significant version changes between what you're > running and what's current, familiarize yourself with the upgrade > issues (if any) that each port presents. Be prepared to test any > new features you hope to use, or to regression test to make sure > that legacy functionality still works the way you expect. This > might be the time to switch to Apache 2, for example, if you want > to. But some things that worked under 1.3 will have to be adjusted > to work under 2. At the least, it would be good to upgrade to the > latest 1.3.x, to use Apache as an example. > > As for #3, I have grown fond of using a FreesBIE or other live CD for > steps like booting the migration/test box to create a backup image of > the new 6.X filesystem, and then also to boot the production box for > the final changeover to transfer that backup image onto the production > disk. That way your file system in an off-line (inactive) state, > where you can cleanly backup the old production filesystem (twice!), > then wipe and re-partition, and transfer the new configuration image > onto the production drive likewise in a clean state. If you haven't > already, spend some time just experimenting on a test machine, and > make friends with FreesBIE and/or the Fixit live CD mode of FreeBSD > installation media. > > Good luck! > > Jim > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 01:13:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939BA16A4D0 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:13:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scphantm@yahoo.com) Received: from ms-smtp-04.tampabay.rr.com (ms-smtp-04.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.5.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320E843CCE for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:08:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scphantm@yahoo.com) Received: from [192.168.0.56] (245.116.118.70.cfl.res.rr.com [70.118.116.245]) by ms-smtp-04.tampabay.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBC19QIc003282 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:09:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <457E0158.10301@yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:09:44 -0500 From: Steel City Phantom User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20061211185718.E5F0616A56A@hub.freebsd.org> <20061211175301.17B7.GERARD@seibercom.net> <5A4918D2-24B4-4786-B17C-8C77BB9547CD@shire.net> <200612111853.46968.lane@joeandlane.com> In-Reply-To: <200612111853.46968.lane@joeandlane.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Mysql Max start on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:13:25 -0000 Im in the middle of installing Mysql max on a bsd 6.2 box, anyone have an idea how to make it start on boot? the script is in the /usr/local/etc/rc.d file and the mysql_enable="YES" is in the rc.conf file but it still isn't starting. since this is max i couldn't install it from the ports, i had to download the binary from mysql. thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 01:14:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF7616A506 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:14:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com) Received: from mail.extracktor.com (www.nexlabs.com [210.193.32.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5F443E8E for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:09:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com) Received: (qmail 6722 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2006 01:07:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (jhfoo@nexlabs.com@222.165.92.33) by www.nexlabs.com with SMTP; 12 Dec 2006 01:07:50 -0000 Message-ID: <457E0174.3040902@extracktor.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:10:12 +0800 From: Foo JH User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Nielsen , tshadwick@oss-solutions.com References: <200612100905.30430.kirk@strauser.com> <20061211054125.GB681@pubbox.net> <457D1B24.8060109@extracktor.com> <200612111316.21351.lists@jnielsen.net> In-Reply-To: <200612111316.21351.lists@jnielsen.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Setting up RAID-1 on 2 unequal disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:14:55 -0000 Hello John, Tony, Thanks for your responses. I think I will try to go with John's approach (ie via gmirror), as I've used it previously for a raiding on equally-sized disks. John, I will be trying out your suggestions in a while. Hope to get your help later down the road. :) Tony, I'm quite sure your trick will work. I'm just too noob on FBSD to trick vinum. :P John Nielsen wrote: > On Monday 11 December 2006 03:47, Foo JH wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I unfortunately have 2 uneuqally sized SATA disks to set up a mirrored >> shared folder: 80GB and 120GB. On the 120GB I plan to set up this way: >> >> /temp 2GB (double the system memory) >> /shared 80GB >> / 38GB >> >> I plan to mirror /shared onto the 80GB. It won't be bootable, but I can >> always mount it onto another FreeBSD machine. >> >> I've read some articles on mirroring on non-equal disks, notably: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/mirror/ >> >> My question is: is there an easier way to do this? The example looks >> quiet daunting for a noobie FreeBSD admin like me. >> > > I would use gmirror. The example page you cite is very thorough and covers > multiple scenarios. I have found gmirror to be extremely easy to use and set > up; much more so than gvinum or even ataraid. > > Gmirrror allows you to use any geom provider as a member (consumer) of a > mirrored set. That includes entire disks (e.g. ad4), slices (e.g. ad4s1), > partitions (e.g. ad4s1a), or even other complex structures (such as a gstripe > set). > > The only hard part is going to be labeling the 120GB disk correctly. You will > most likely want to do it manually using bsdlabel. One approach would be > something like the following. Assume ad4 is the 120GB disk and ad6 is the > 80GB disk. Boot up using a FreeBSD install disk and go into "Fixit" mode. > > # fdisk -BI /dev/ad6 > (it's safe to ignore the warning here) > > # bsdlabel -Bw /dev/ad6s1 > > # sysctl kern.module_path="/dist/boot/kernel" > > # gmirror load > > # gmirror label -b load shared /dev/ad6s1a > ("shared" is the name of your volume.. you can use whatever you want) > > # gmirror list > (will show you details about your new "broken" mirror. Make a note of > the "Mediasize" number listed under the consumer.) > > # fdisk -BI /dev/ad4 > (it's safe to ignore the warning here) > > # bsdlabel -Bw /dev/ad4s1 > > (these are only needed if you don't like/don't know how to use vi) > # EDITOR=ee > # export EDITOR > > # bsdlabel -e /dev/ad4s1 > > Now comes the tricky part. The number shown on the c: line of the label is the > number of 512-byte sectors on the disk. It's good practice to leave 16 > sectors unused at the beginning of the disk; you can see this in the default > whole-disk a: line. Figure out how big you need to make the slice for the > other side of the mirror by dividing the Mediasize number you noted > previously by 512. Then figure out how big you want your swap (if any--you > didn't mention any above) and /temp partitions by multiplying out to the > number of bytes then dividing by 512. Add all of that up plus the 16-sector > space at the beginning and subtract from the size (c: line) to determine how > much is left for /. Calculate all the offsets and put in the fstype (either > 4.2BSD or swap), and put zeroes in the other columns. > > As a reference, here is one of my disks: > > # /dev/ad4s1: > 8 partitions: > # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > a: 6291456 1048502 4.2BSD 0 0 0 > b: 1048486 16 swap > c: 156312513 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't > edit > d: 117266625 39045888 4.2BSD 0 0 0 > e: 31705930 7339958 4.2BSD 0 0 0 > > Save the label and exit the editor. > > Now to finish up: > > # gmirror insert shared /dev/ad4s1e > (be sure to use the actual partition device you set up above) > > # newfs -U /dev/mirror/shared > ( /shared ) > # newfs -U /dev/ad4s1a > ( / ) > # newfs -U /dev/ad4s1d > ( /temp ) > > Then exit fixit mode and do a Standard installation. Don't let sysinstall > re-label or newfs anything, just specify the mount points for your / > and /shared filesystems. You'll have to mount the mirror after you're done > with setup (just put it in /etc/fstab manually). > > Obviously, you should understand what all of the above does before you do any > of it, and may need to make changes. > > Good luck, and feel free to ask additional questions. > > JN > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 01:19:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B5016A492 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:19:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@budostore.de) Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de (mo-p00-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D7543EC8 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:12:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from news@budostore.de) Received: from nor75-5-82-235-173-77.fbx.proxad.net (nor75-5-82-235-173-77.fbx.proxad.net [82.235.173.77]) by post.webmailer.de (mrclete mo4) (RZmta 3.9) with ESMTP id iBBK7O15010c2O for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 02:13:23 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 02:13:23 +0100 (MET) From: Karl Sinn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612120205.59582.news@budostore.de> X-RZG-AUTH: ibDpgOm8RLcSc5zBxTj4 Subject: Re: mount USB-Device SOLVED X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:19:42 -0000 Hi, Am Dienstag, 12. Dezember 2006 00:43 schrieb Wood, Russell: > > mount -t msdos /dev/da0 /mnt It worked. Thanks Karl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 01:48:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A264B16A4AB for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:48:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18BEC43CC0 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:46:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so83658nfc for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:47:42 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=OCykX1+GSIM15ivOIVY3yCM+qEyWaD+6M9aBRwu/Xvei7hRD3SfY8kjQQKJfFNubH1ltkK48vn15z5eUR2yfJvBYtsxhFQEF8MJctmqLQlh7J+51H3dgMhtBp7i7ZSt/3H+kArJKEgjZVIe+kt61dmK5ijQ4ce6FzfoMx5AyzE0= Received: by 10.82.153.5 with SMTP id a5mr562251bue.1165888061812; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:47:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.176.11 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:47:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <539c60b90612111747m4a794170x16fe58d54f7e5eee@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:47:41 -0700 From: "Steve Franks" Sender: bahamasfranks@gmail.com To: "Albert Boeve" In-Reply-To: <000001c71c2a$d4ea5680$0600a8c0@AlbertNotebk1> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <000001c71c2a$d4ea5680$0600a8c0@AlbertNotebk1> X-Google-Sender-Auth: a9a926ad53b67dbf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Seagate 4GB ATA-CF drive on IDE bus won't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:48:47 -0000 I have a microdrive that's finicky also. Seems the problem is it's a 1.8Vcard, which is not standard (standard appears to be 5V or 3.3V). It will not work, period, in a CF<->IDE converter, or in a PCMCIA<->CF converter. It works fine, however, in *some* USB card readers, namely the cheapo ones off ebay, but not the expensive ones I bought at the local office supply store. I suspect that is the problem, at least it was for me. Steve On 12/10/06, Albert Boeve wrote: > > I want to install Freebsd 6.2 onto a seagate 4GB compact flash microdrive. > > Neither FreeBSD 6.1 or 6.2-RC1 installers seem to detect the ATA-CF card > on > the bus; although NetBSD was able to be installed on the drive and works > OK. > > I have tried installing the drive as ata0 master in two different > machines; > both times NetBSD is able to boot off the drive -ie the hardware is > working > fine - however the FreeBSD insaller does not detect the drive. > > Fitting the microdrive in a working FreeBSD machine as ata1 master does > not > give any further debug info - no dmesg, sysctl seems to log the attachment > as failing, although it is detected by BIOS as ST64022CF. > > FreeBSD 6.2-RC1 FreeBSD 6.2-RC1 #0: Thu Nov 16 05:12:08 UTC 2006 > root@opus.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386 > > # atacontrol list > ATA channel 0: > Master: ad0 ATA/ATAPI revision > 4 > Slave: no device present > ATA channel 1: > Master: no device present > Slave: acd0 <201H> ATA/ATAPI revision 0 > > > NetBSD atactl gives: > > NetBSD 3.0.1 (GENERIC) #0: Thu Jul 13 23:43:47 UTC 2006 > > # atactl wd0 identify > Model: ST64022CF, Rev: 3.02, Serial #: 4NW03XLS > Device type: ATAPI, removable > Device capabilities: > DMA > LBA > IORDY operation > Command set support: > NOP command (enabled) > READ BUFFER command (enabled) > WRITE BUFFER command (enabled) > look-ahead (enabled) > write cache (enabled) > Power Management feature set (enabled) > SMART feature set (enabled) > FLUSH CACHE command (enabled) > Advanced Power Management feature set (enabled) > CFA feature set (enabled) > > Is there a simple fix to make FreeBSD ata recognize the drive? > > NB there is a simmilar question about using the same card in a pccard > adapter, > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2006-March/061937.html > which appears to have been resolved? > > Thank You > > Regards, Albert > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Steve Franks, KE7BTE Staff Engineer La Palma Devices, LLC http://www.lapalmadevices.com (520) 312-0089 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 02:00:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94A416A417 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 02:00:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93D843D4C for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:57:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.141]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBC1wrfd030748 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:58:53 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBC1wqGs021769 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:58:53 -0800 Message-ID: <457E0CDC.2060308@u.washington.edu> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:58:52 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20061211120032.5DFBA16A611@hub.freebsd.org> <20061211213039.GA69273@ns.umpquanet.com> <17489c7a0612111705p604515efq2371aac614d6ccd6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <17489c7a0612111705p604515efq2371aac614d6ccd6@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2006.12.11.174432 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __PHISH_PHRASE11 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: Major Version Upgrade - 4.11 to 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 02:00:28 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chad Gross wrote: > First I would address the first question. Only you can really answer > whether > or not there is a benefit. Is there a specific need (e.g. software/hardware > support) for you to upgrade? If not then I would recommend against the > upgrade. If yes, I why not move to 6.x? I have been running FBSD since > 4.0and have run every revision since and would not suggest using > 5.x. Either stick with 4.x or move to 6.x based on your requirements. > > To answer your second question, the best place to look for help is the > handbook ( > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html). > Also make sure to read /usr/src/UPDATING as this may contain special > instructions. It is a general rule of thumb to do a clean install between > major revisions though. I have personally done them with success, but would > not recommend doing it on a production server if it is your first time > doing > one (as it sounds to be). Stick to upgrading between minor revisions until > you are familiar with the build/make process. Also these mailing lists > are a > great resource for help as is http://www.bsdforums.org/ (and a few others, > use Google). > > Finally, as mentioned above, from personal experience it is best to stick > with a clean install between major revisions. > > Good luck again, > > Chad Bad way to look at things, given that 4.x isn't supported anymore by the FreeBSD group; so anything either userland or core system related that needs to be upgraded due to a security or performance issue would require an upgrade anyhow.. You should run at least 5.x, but it's highly recommended that you go to 6.x, due to performance improvements and the fact that you won't have to source upgrade your system again for a lot longer period of time (than if you moved to 5.x). The only issue is that you don't have direct access to the machine. - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFfgzb6CkrZkzMC68RAq/mAJ9yI77ldLufgbAr31hMFUcvRantjQCfZ0MM MIoBYNgZJfui6Fnn1GlGRXU= =L/oJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 02:32:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A41F16A4CA for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 02:32:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: from web60118.mail.yahoo.com (web60118.mail.yahoo.com [209.73.178.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 978DA43E75 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 02:25:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: (qmail 80644 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Dec 2006 02:26:31 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=bwSyuYCcvPrL2SLIOTSkBYYn7fRBGzB/hK2AZ8Co3wO06bAltGpPaw3/uKMmRndFzQGgijKarcCNPfOrkpZfCys/Z/16NCmlxg8TC57kTtioUg+7oRN666tm3Ri39Hs2hfj+5LqxE/Ubjo615LZNHN9CkI9vC34oHqsaOtM5UbY=; X-YMail-OSG: xblFkqoVM1m8r_j2s6ARwvqgYZzZdQO4kfL6Dq5.gnLW4XHZ2yyrcw3xcf8QgUOjgm6vTjw4LPenSzCHUI3LMNvMNmLFhI1CsI0kJiGXpDnQgJUKUh7i.y0QboF8u0UD9Sbrd1lNOPqyV6eo Received: from [70.53.153.132] by web60118.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:26:31 EST Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:26:31 -0500 (EST) From: Peter Matulis To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <656980.80393.qm@web60118.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: disklabel and usb device X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 02:32:52 -0000 I am having trouble viewing my USB compact flash reader with my FBSD 5.5 system. I have done so in the past. For some reason I can no longer do so. This is what I'm getting: # disklabel /dev/da0s1 disklabel: /dev/da0s1: no valid label found # fdisk /dev/da0s1 ******* Working on device /dev/da0s1 ******* parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: cylinders=249 heads=64 sectors/track=32 (2048 blks/cyl) parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: cylinders=249 heads=64 sectors/track=32 (2048 blks/cyl) Media sector size is 512 Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 Information from DOS bootblock is: The data for partition 1 is: sysid 108 (0x6c),(unknown) start 1684955424, size 1701998624 (831054 Meg), flag a beg: cyl 368/ head 82/ sector 37; end: cyl 357/ head 97/ sector 35 The data for partition 2 is: sysid 110 (0x6e),(unknown) start 1998616933, size 544105832 (265676 Meg), flag 73 beg: cyl 97/ head 115/ sector 32; end: cyl 107/ head 121/ sector 32 The data for partition 3 is: sysid 121 (0x79),(QNX4.x 3rd part) start 538988361, size 538976288 (263172 Meg), flag 72 beg: cyl 356/ head 101/ sector 33; end: cyl 0/ head 13/ sector 10 The data for partition 4 is: sysid 83 (0x53),(DM6 Aux3) start 1394614304, size 21337 (10 Meg), flag 53 beg: cyl 333/ head 89/ sector 19; end: cyl 339/ head 68/ sector 15 >From logs: kernel: umass0: SanDisk ImageMate 8 in 1, rev 2.00/91.44, addr 2 The card contains an OpenBSD filesystem. Peter __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 04:13:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669B616A40F for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 04:13:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC6143CA1 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 04:11:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so895174nzh for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:13:10 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ZBp3wd36JAwvUedLWCzOiW+LUZm73g3xGAqiv/WI6LDTthbmIuNCoX+F9x3bqNucsCUDnKBHhuARj2uEOT4gMwMqU5fH7z6boxjkq/QVzwD5xhYblBX8TdjJ9cjYF94nuKwegswRIEPSverr8M4acnY9UKEJJuJ02NzaXyuSHNw= Received: by 10.64.156.3 with SMTP id d3mr12340325qbe.1165896790023; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:13:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.75.14 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:13:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <17489c7a0612112013ifdce534y12ee6ea4ae7747de@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:13:09 -0500 From: "Chad Gross" To: "Garrett Cooper" In-Reply-To: <457E0CDC.2060308@u.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061211120032.5DFBA16A611@hub.freebsd.org> <20061211213039.GA69273@ns.umpquanet.com> <17489c7a0612111705p604515efq2371aac614d6ccd6@mail.gmail.com> <457E0CDC.2060308@u.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Major Version Upgrade - 4.11 to 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 04:13:20 -0000 On 12/11/06, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Chad Gross wrote: > > First I would address the first question. Only you can really answer > > whether > > or not there is a benefit. Is there a specific need (e.g. > software/hardware > > support) for you to upgrade? If not then I would recommend against the > > upgrade. If yes, I why not move to 6.x? I have been running FBSD since > > 4.0and have run every revision since and would not suggest using > > 5.x. Either stick with 4.x or move to 6.x based on your requirements. > > > > To answer your second question, the best place to look for help is the > > handbook ( > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html > ). > > Also make sure to read /usr/src/UPDATING as this may contain special > > instructions. It is a general rule of thumb to do a clean install > between > > major revisions though. I have personally done them with success, but > would > > not recommend doing it on a production server if it is your first time > > doing > > one (as it sounds to be). Stick to upgrading between minor revisions > until > > you are familiar with the build/make process. Also these mailing lists > > are a > > great resource for help as is http://www.bsdforums.org/ (and a few > others, > > use Google). > > > > Finally, as mentioned above, from personal experience it is best to > stick > > with a clean install between major revisions. > > > > Good luck again, > > > > Chad > > >> Bad way to look at things, given that 4.x isn't supported > >>anymore by the FreeBSD group; so anything either userland or core system > >>related that needs to be upgraded due to a security or performance issue > >>would require an upgrade anyhow.. > >> You should run at least 5.x, but it's highly recommended that > >>you go to 6.x, due to performance improvements and the fact that you > >>won't have to source upgrade your system again for a lot longer period > >>of time (than if you moved to 5.x). > >> The only issue is that you don't have direct access to the > machine. > >>- -Garrett I apologize, I didn't realize that 4.x was no longer supported (I thought RELENG_4 was still getting commits). In that case, I would make the move to 6.x being that 5.x wasn't exactly the best release performance-wise and it will be moving out of support sooner too. Chad From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 04:18:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4DB16A4C2 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 04:18:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2360143DD1 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 04:16:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so895628nzh for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:17:16 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=cSg3VwnD0bZIINk1pJInRufWQ4Pc7jggXI5N/X+Y4sXRxSeSLH/sWt3JzWz0ORrefedHAauAEKTXJ0zLhuV148jqeUTqzePIciErnSO9eG5071l6R5jUJod9SMOt7kVvbltlT37oZjKi9TfjHNhxn09fcs+BdnSYfFZeLX9/gDU= Received: by 10.65.23.7 with SMTP id a7mr12311975qbj.1165897035911; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:17:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.75.14 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:17:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <17489c7a0612112017lbe8f3ddv791ab0bf8be0d333@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:17:15 -0500 From: "Chad Gross" To: Ne'Bahn In-Reply-To: <001601c71d6e$f09c9470$09d3dcc9@bloodlust> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <001601c71d6e$f09c9470$09d3dcc9@bloodlust> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: UNIX - questions Subject: Re: Fonts on X.Org... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 04:18:22 -0000 On 12/11/06, Ne'Bahn wrote: > > Hi list, how can I add some fonts to the system, for instance: Arial, > Courier New, and so others. I know there are some fonts that cost to > acquire > them, but isn't an implementation of these fonts for > the open source arena ??? > > PS: I've some docs made in a Windows environment that use fonts I don't > have > on FreeBSD, the replacement is very bad, so OpenOffice offers system fonts > rather than their fonts (if it has a set), a problem for > portability/compatibility but indeed better for availability. > > _______________________________________________ > Try installing x11-fonts/webfonts from the ports collection. Chad From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 04:56:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C225516A407 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 04:56:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B192C43CA0 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 04:55:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Gtzgv-0000YG-H5 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:56:33 -0500 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost.localnet.local [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kBC4xCuW023407 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:59:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id kBC4xBAO023207 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:59:11 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:59:11 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061211120032.5DFBA16A611@hub.freebsd.org> <457E0CDC.2060308@u.washington.edu> <17489c7a0612112013ifdce534y12ee6ea4ae7747de@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <17489c7a0612112013ifdce534y12ee6ea4ae7747de@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612112259.11714.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79214b595f39845ead63b61220e16f8550350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Re: Major Version Upgrade - 4.11 to 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 04:56:34 -0000 On Monday 11 December 2006 22:13, Chad Gross wrote: > On 12/11/06, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Chad Gross wrote: > > > First I would address the first question. Only you can really answer > > > whether > > > or not there is a benefit. Is there a specific need (e.g. > > > > software/hardware > > > > > support) for you to upgrade? If not then I would recommend against the > > > upgrade. If yes, I why not move to 6.x? I have been running FBSD since > > > 4.0and have run every revision since and would not suggest using > > > 5.x. Either stick with 4.x or move to 6.x based on your requirements. > > > > > > To answer your second question, the best place to look for help is the > > > handbook ( > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.htm > > >l > > > > ). > > > > > Also make sure to read /usr/src/UPDATING as this may contain special > > > instructions. It is a general rule of thumb to do a clean install > > > > between > > > > > major revisions though. I have personally done them with success, but > > > > would > > > > > not recommend doing it on a production server if it is your first time > > > doing > > > one (as it sounds to be). Stick to upgrading between minor revisions > > > > until > > > > > you are familiar with the build/make process. Also these mailing lists > > > are a > > > great resource for help as is http://www.bsdforums.org/ (and a few > > > > others, > > > > > use Google). > > > > > > Finally, as mentioned above, from personal experience it is best to > > > > stick > > > > > with a clean install between major revisions. > > > > > > Good luck again, > > > > > > Chad > > > > > >> Bad way to look at things, given that 4.x isn't supported > > >>anymore by the FreeBSD group; so anything either userland or core > > >> system related that needs to be upgraded due to a security or > > >> performance issue would require an upgrade anyhow.. > > >> > > >> You should run at least 5.x, but it's highly recommended that > > >> > > >>you go to 6.x, due to performance improvements and the fact that you > > >>won't have to source upgrade your system again for a lot longer period > > >>of time (than if you moved to 5.x). > > >> The only issue is that you don't have direct access to the > > > > machine. > > > > >>- -Garrett > > I apologize, I didn't realize that 4.x was no longer supported (I thought > RELENG_4 was still getting commits). In that case, I would make the move to > 6.x being that 5.x wasn't exactly the best release performance-wise and it > will be moving out of support sooner too. > > Chad Chad, What was the problem with performance in 5.x? I'm not challenging your assertion, not at all. But this is the second time in this thread that I've read comments about poor performance in 5.x, and ... well ... I've not experienced that - quite the contrary. I'm just curious - did I maybe miss some discussion about how poor 5.x was? Thanks for your time lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 05:04:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3903816A40F for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:04:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lucydes@adelphia.net) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3292043CA9 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:03:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lucydes@adelphia.net) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (really [71.62.88.71]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20061212050430.UQVR11646.mta10.adelphia.net@[127.0.0.1]>; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:04:30 -0500 Message-ID: <457E3A83.4060904@adelphia.net> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:13:39 -0500 From: Denise and Raul User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Giorgos Keramidas References: <454AB1FF.2040005@adelphia.net> <20061103033915.GA16851@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <20061103033915.GA16851@kobe.laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ISO files... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:04:31 -0000 I apologize for not getting back to you sooner. Thanks, for all who replied, but this solution was very helpful and I'm now operational. Thanks again, Raul Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2006-11-02 22:05, Denise and Raul wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I have ISO files saved on cd's. >> 1) 6.1-RELEASE-i386-bootonly.iso >> 2) 6.1-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso >> 3) 6.1-RELEASE-i386-disc2.iso >> > > if you have saved these ISO images as "files" on a CD-ROM, there is > something wrong here. These are meant to be written as "raw images" > each on a separate CD-ROM disk. > > Most CD-burning software has two modes: > > * One that lets you select files from a disk directory, and burn these > files as a collection of *files* on a CD-ROM disk. > > * One that lets you burn a CD-ROM disk *image* as an "image". > > You have to use the second mode, and burn 6.1-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso on > a disk of its own. Then 6.1-RELEASE-i386-disc2.iso on a second disk. > > After you have done these two steps, you can insert the first disk in a > CD-ROM drive, and you will see the _contents_ of the CD-ROM disk :) > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 05:15:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA97116A403 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:15:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@tropo.org) Received: from webmail.dogbark.com (webmail.dogbark.com [208.65.30.92]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0093643CAA for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:14:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@tropo.org) Received: from webmail.dogbark.com (webmail.dogbark.com [208.65.30.92]) by webmail.dogbark.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08D51203A6F for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:15:48 -0600 (CST) Received: from 69.73.127.132 (SquirrelMail authenticated user w4lna) by webmail.dogbark.com with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:15:48 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <60158.69.73.127.132.1165900548.squirrel@webmail.dogbark.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:15:48 -0600 (CST) From: "Mike Murphree" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Dummynet fragmenting packets X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:15:50 -0000 Having an issue on a 5.3 system using ipfw and dummynet to create a bandwidth limited and large latency pipe for a mpeg video stream. If I pass the packets between the two NICs without routing through a dummynet pipe, it's fine. If I route it through a pipe, it's fragmenting each packet (client requested 1468 byte packets) into two packets, the second packet with an offset of 1440 bytes. Does anyone have any idea why it's doing this, and have a solution to this problem? Thanks, Mike (please cc directly) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 06:38:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D803216A415 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:38:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F2E43CCB for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:37:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tao.thought.org (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kBC6c9u1031468 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:38:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id kBC6c9JZ031467 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:38:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:38:09 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20061212063808.GA31424@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing twenty years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: Subject: can I use perl substitution to handle hex chars? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:38:22 -0000 To the tool wizards out there, Seems like lots of files I get off the net use \x80\x98 or the like to denote various non-ascii characters. Is there a way to use perl (or any other unix tool) to replace \x\x with, say whatever ASCII or ISO-8859-1 character or characters? thanks in advance, guys, gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public Service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 06:47:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DEFA16A403 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:47:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=HH7tnc=FW=vvelox.net=v.velox@yourhostingaccount.com) Received: from mailout16.yourhostingaccount.com (mailout16.yourhostingaccount.com [65.254.253.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06E7B43C9E for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:46:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from SRS0=HH7tnc=FW=vvelox.net=v.velox@yourhostingaccount.com) Received: from scan04.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.1.234] helo=scan04.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailout16.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1Gu1QI-0007o9-87 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:47:30 -0500 Received: from authsmtp11.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.18.11] ident=exim) by scan04.yourhostingaccount.com with spamscanlookuphost (Exim) id 1Gu1QI-0005Jk-1F for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:47:30 -0500 Received: from authsmtp11.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.18.11] helo=authsmtp11.yourhostingaccount.com) by scan04.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1Gu1QH-0005Jd-HF for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:47:29 -0500 Received: from [69.92.217.33] (helo=vixen42) by authsmtp11.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtpa (Exim) id 1Gu1QH-0005XP-18; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:47:29 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:48:07 -0600 From: Vulpes Velox To: "Tsu-Fan Cheng" Message-ID: <20061212004807.49ba3066@vixen42> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EN-UserInfo: 0d1ca1697cdb7a831d4877828571b7ab:1570f0de6936c69fef9e164fffc541bc X-EN-AuthUser: vvelox2 Sender: Vulpes Velox Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: skype and other *phones X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:47:31 -0000 On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 14:09:03 -0500 "Tsu-Fan Cheng" wrote: > Hi people, > hapy holiday! i have a question about the internet phone apps, > what is the major difference between skype and other *phone system? > and I know that bsd has limited support of sound card that works > with skype in the past, I wonder if the support is getting better > these days? and also how is the driver support for other *phone > apps? thank you for your time!! Been using it here with out a problem. :) Including calling out to regular phones. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 07:05:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902CF16A47B for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:05:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B6E43CA5 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:03:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1426508uge for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:05:07 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=s0bNH0QkU0sy9fv2i89g5eCJcsGDtdAaqgvogHaFNzV+61i6iTGjAMtDT91YUDd2h/0sW88m0c6R9Vjgyg5W0AAHaP8d+uCO2zgjUgjPKj1t9VOwmZGOcPp+hIBQ6AeGPmaEw8NIFiyufEE1LUqkn8G2GCMySABXpfzXng3JFYw= Received: by 10.67.22.7 with SMTP id z7mr4930842ugi.1165907107745; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:05:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.10.4 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:05:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:05:07 -0600 From: "Eric Kjeldergaard" To: "Tsu-Fan Cheng" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: skype and other *phones X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:05:09 -0000 On 12/10/06, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: > > Hi people, > hapy holiday! i have a question about the internet phone apps, what is > the > major difference between skype and other *phone system? and I know that > bsd > has limited support of sound card that works with skype in the past, I > wonder if the support is getting better these days? and also how is the > driver support for other *phone apps? thank you for your time!! If you are open to suggestions on other phone systems, I have been very much enjoying my gizmo account. (gizmoproject.com) I generally use ekiga to connect to it, but the benefit of gizmo is that it uses the standard SIP protocol for accessing the service. Further, the rates are quite good. For free it gives services like incoming phone calls, voice mail, and free SIP<->SIP calls. For a $.01/minute (for US numbers) fee it gives outgoing to-landline calls. Don't mean to sound like an advertisement, I just love open standards being used. Eric Kjeldergaard -- If I write a signature, my emails will appear more personalised. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 07:09:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8206F16A4FE for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:09:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talbytech@southernphone.com.au) Received: from relay01.ispone.net.au (relay01.ispone.net.au [124.254.72.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDDF043CAA for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:08:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from talbytech@southernphone.com.au) Received: from AlbertNotebk1 (124-254-108-246-dsl.ispone.net.au [124.254.108.246]) by relay01.ispone.net.au (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id kBC79hFo012039; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:09:44 +1100 From: "Albert Boeve" To: "'Steve Franks'" Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:09:43 +1100 Message-ID: <000201c71dbc$80f05640$0600a8c0@AlbertNotebk1> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 In-Reply-To: <539c60b90612111747m4a794170x16fe58d54f7e5eee@mail.gmail.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Seagate 4GB ATA-CF drive on IDE bus won't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:09:51 -0000 Thanks, Steve. =20 My microdrive works fine on the IDE bus - just not with FreeBSD :( =20 Works OK with NetBSD, OpenBSD and also Ubuntu linux...I will look closer = at the ata driver and see what the differences are to the NetBSD version. =20 Albert -----Original Message----- From: bahamasfranks@gmail.com [mailto:bahamasfranks@gmail.com] On Behalf = Of Steve Franks Sent: Tuesday, 12 December 2006 12:48 PM To: Albert Boeve Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Seagate 4GB ATA-CF drive on IDE bus won't work I have a microdrive that's finicky also. Seems the problem is it's a = 1.8V card, which is not standard (standard appears to be 5V or 3.3V). It = will not work, period, in a CF<->IDE converter, or in a PCMCIA<->CF = converter. It works fine, however, in *some* USB card readers, namely the cheapo = ones off ebay, but not the expensive ones I bought at the local office supply store. I suspect that is the problem, at least it was for me.=20 Steve On 12/10/06, Albert Boeve wrote:=20 I want to install Freebsd 6.2 onto a seagate 4GB compact flash = microdrive. Neither FreeBSD 6.1 or 6.2-RC1 installers seem to detect the ATA-CF card = on the bus; although NetBSD was able to be installed on the drive and works = OK. I have tried installing the drive as ata0 master in two different = machines; both times NetBSD is able to boot off the drive -ie the hardware is = working fine - however the FreeBSD insaller does not detect the drive.=20 Fitting the microdrive in a working FreeBSD machine as ata1 master does = not give any further debug info - no dmesg, sysctl seems to log the = attachment as failing, although it is detected by BIOS as ST64022CF.=20 FreeBSD 6.2-RC1 FreeBSD 6.2-RC1 #0: Thu Nov 16 05:12:08 UTC 2006 root@opus.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386 # atacontrol list ATA channel 0: Master: ad0 ATA/ATAPI = revision 4 Slave: no device present ATA channel 1: Master: no device present Slave: acd0 <201H> ATA/ATAPI revision 0 NetBSD atactl gives:=20 NetBSD 3.0.1 (GENERIC) #0: Thu Jul 13 23:43:47 UTC 2006 # atactl wd0 identify Model: ST64022CF, Rev: 3.02, Serial #: 4NW03XLS Device type: ATAPI, removable Device capabilities: DMA=20 LBA IORDY operation Command set support: NOP command (enabled) READ BUFFER command (enabled) WRITE BUFFER command (enabled) look-ahead (enabled) write cache (enabled)=20 Power Management feature set (enabled) SMART feature set (enabled) FLUSH CACHE command (enabled) Advanced Power Management feature set (enabled) CFA feature set (enabled)=20 Is there a simple fix to make FreeBSD ata recognize the drive? NB there is a simmilar question about using the same card in a pccard adapter, http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2006-March/061937.html= which appears to have been resolved? Thank You Regards, Albert _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to " freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=20 Steve Franks, KE7BTE Staff Engineer La Palma Devices, LLC=20 http://www.lapalmadevices.com (520) 312-0089=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 07:10:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011A816A40F for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:10:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from renegadepenguin@comcast.net) Received: from alnrmhc12.comcast.net (alnrmhc12.comcast.net [206.18.177.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922C243CA0 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:09:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from renegadepenguin@comcast.net) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (c-67-183-204-41.hsd1.wa.comcast.net[67.183.204.41]) by comcast.net (alnrmhc12) with ESMTP id <20061212071016b1200bnvf9e>; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:10:21 +0000 Message-ID: <457E55E1.7090100@comcast.net> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:10:25 -0800 From: Renegade Penguin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b1pre (Windows/20061118) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: skype and other *phones X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:10:22 -0000 Eric Kjeldergaard wrote: > > If you are open to suggestions on other phone systems, I have been very > much enjoying my gizmo account. (gizmoproject.com) I generally use > ekiga > to connect to it, but the benefit of gizmo is that it uses the > standard SIP > protocol for accessing the service. Further, the rates are quite > good. For > free it gives services like incoming phone calls, voice mail, and free > SIP<->SIP calls. For a $.01/minute (for US numbers) fee it gives > outgoing > to-landline calls. Don't mean to sound like an advertisement, I just > love > open standards being used. > > Eric Kjeldergaard > Yes, but the gizmoproject is particularly onerous. Look at the EULA: http://www.gizmoproject.com/gizmo-end-user.html Michael Robertson is the head of that project, IIRC. Fairly nasty EULA for using such "open" terms. Can't even redistribute the software. Pity. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 07:14:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C02416A403 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:14:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mapsware@prodigy.net.mx) Received: from smtp.prodigy.net.mx (nlpproxy08.prodigy.net.mx [148.235.52.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934AE43CC9 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:13:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mapsware@prodigy.net.mx) Received: from smtp.prodigy.net.mx (nlpproxy08 [148.235.52.28]) by smtp.prodigy.net.mx (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.05 (built Mar 3 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JA500HEUG3YN6@smtp.prodigy.net.mx>; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:14:22 -0600 (CST) Received: from morena.maps.mx(dsl-189-165-11-230.prod-infinitum.com.mx [189.165.11.230]) by smtp.prodigy.net.mx(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.05 (built Mar 3 2005))with ESMTP id <0JA500FADG3XVO@smtp.prodigy.net.mx>; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:14:22 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:14:21 -0700 From: Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez In-reply-to: <20061204154222.GA636@host.my.domain> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <200612120014.22107.mapsware@prodigy.net.mx> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 X-imss-version: 2.045 X-imss-result: Passed X-imss-scores: Clean:99.90000 C:2 M:6 S:5 R:5 X-imss-settings: Baseline:4 C:4 M:4 S:4 R:4 (9.0000 9.0000) References: <20061203174849.GA4561@host.my.domain> <20061204154222.GA636@host.my.domain> Cc: a@zeos.net Subject: Re: How does my computer work with an empty arp table? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:14:33 -0000 El Lun 04 Dic 2006 08:42, a@zeos.net escribi=C3=B3: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 10:26:46AM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > a@zeos.net writes: > > > My computer is connected to ISP via ADSL and works properly. > > > > > > I typed > > > > > > arp -a > > > > > > and saw an empty table, although I pinged successfully an Internet ho= st > > > one second ago. > > > > > > How does it work? > > > $ ifconfig > > > rl0: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0options=3D8 > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0inet6 fe80::202:44ff:fe92:1875%rl0 prefixlen = 64 scopeid 0x1=20 > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0inet 192.168.1.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast= 192.168.1.255 > > > > Maybe you are connected to your service provider by PPP-over-Ethernet? > > In that case, the PPP link (which doesn't need ARP) is your next-hop > > to the Internet, rather than the modem on the Ethernet link. > > Yes, you are right, I forgot about PPP. Many thanks. Also, the ARP table only contain info of your subnet maps From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 07:16:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624C416A403 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:16:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhongtao@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn) Received: from mail.tsinghua.edu.cn (mail.tsinghua.edu.cn [166.111.8.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FF1643CA3 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:15:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zhongtao@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn) Received: from zhongtao.tsinghua.edu.cn.zhongtao@tsinghua.edu.cn([166.111.249.119]) by mail.tsinghua.edu.cn(AIMC 3.2.0.0) with SMTP id jm2457eb4f8; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:16:29 +0800 X-MaxRuleNumber-200: 81455 3346869 X-MatchRuleNumber-200: 3670 1651563 X-Action-200: D Received: from zhongtao.tsinghua.edu.cn.zhongtao@tsinghua.edu.cn([166.111.249.119]) by mail.tsinghua.edu.cn(AIMC 3.2.0.0) with SMTP id AISP action; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:16:29 +0800 To: Eric References: <86r6v6fnjb.fsf@tsinghua.edu.cn> <457D7D66.8090407@mikestammer.com> <86k60yfmg8.fsf@tsinghua.edu.cn> <457D83D9.1010802@mikestammer.com> From: Zhongtao Zhu Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:16:27 +0800 In-Reply-To: <457D83D9.1010802@mikestammer.com> (Eric's message of "Mon\, 11 Dec 2006 10\:14\:17 -0600") Message-ID: <86ac1t8tys.fsf@tsinghua.edu.cn> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-AIMC-AUTH: zhongtao:mail X-AIMC-MAILFROM: zhongtao@tsinghua.edu.cn X-AIMC-Msg-ID: lAVsBuQB Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it safe to `make buildworld' while using ccache? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:16:42 -0000 On Tue 12 Dec 2006 00:14, Eric writes: > check out the post install instructions for ccache and verify on > your system. once you do that, it should work without issue. the > ccache stuff has to be listed first in your path for it to work > properly as far as i know. > > Good luck! After re-checking, `CCACHE_PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin' actually shows up before the `PATH' variable. Sorry for my previously misleading reply. Regards, -- Zhongtao Zhu Tel: 86 10 62796829 Department of Computer Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 07:19:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA17C16A403 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:19:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2145843CB2 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:17:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1428484uge for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:18:36 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=BV1yceEkuYZXy0vXMgNSEKxmVZyaUREek1J9hF76BdF723Kma8P11Tk19wkJIYGdeYcmrByC8YeDM8tz2ZS/ZOybmg1kyQuv5JbMlrZ3/nEsQnkeLq9opfKagJ6BAGsdOJMl/+uzcsZ2Ubjqd+2t7ZhiQYG/SaHBWjIWztIkseQ= Received: by 10.67.19.17 with SMTP id w17mr11218099ugi.1165907916053; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:18:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.10.4 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:18:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:18:35 -0600 From: "Eric Kjeldergaard" To: "Renegade Penguin" In-Reply-To: <457E55E1.7090100@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <457E55E1.7090100@comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: skype and other *phones X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:19:07 -0000 On 12/12/06, Renegade Penguin wrote: > > > > Eric Kjeldergaard wrote: > > > > If you are open to suggestions on other phone systems, I have been very > > much enjoying my gizmo account. (gizmoproject.com) I generally use > > ekiga > > to connect to it, but the benefit of gizmo is that it uses the > > standard SIP > > protocol for accessing the service. Further, the rates are quite > > good. For > > free it gives services like incoming phone calls, voice mail, and free > > SIP<->SIP calls. For a $.01/minute (for US numbers) fee it gives > > outgoing > > to-landline calls. Don't mean to sound like an advertisement, I just > > love > > open standards being used. > > > > Eric Kjeldergaard > > > Yes, but the gizmoproject is particularly onerous. Look at the EULA: > > http://www.gizmoproject.com/gizmo-end-user.html > > Michael Robertson is the head of that project, IIRC. Fairly nasty EULA > for using such "open" terms. Can't even redistribute the software. > > Pity. As a bit of clarification, I'd like to note that I make no endorsement of the gizmo _software_ which this EULA regards. It is instead that the service with its SIP standard implementation that I enjoy. I was initially a bit upset that their software was not open source, but as the major alternative (skype) is both closed protocal and closed source, I choose the lesser of two weevils. -- If I write a signature, my emails will appear more personalised. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 07:50:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BB116A415 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:50:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from besquivel@immense.net) Received: from mail1.immense.net (mail.immense.net [216.93.243.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFC343DC8 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:48:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from besquivel@immense.net) Received: from bret (bret.immense.local [10.0.10.200]) by mail1.immense.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20AB71D7844 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:49:56 -0600 (CST) From: "Bret J. Esquivel" To: Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:49:56 -0600 Organization: Immense Networks, LLC Message-ID: <014301c71dc2$1e3d1910$5ab74b30$@net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AccdwhpyjNb9635XQRCDxhfmP9gDfw== Content-Language: en-us x-cr-hashedpuzzle: Atyr CGm4 CfK3 C2gy EAst EUPO FEGC FgGW FvDf F+lS GUCF HyNT IuAp JHva JQUF JcmX; 1; ZgByAGUAZQBiAHMAZAAtAHEAdQBlAHMAdABpAG8AbgBzAEAAZgByAGUAZQBiAHMAZAAuAG8AcgBnAA==; Sosha1_v1; 7; {38AC2DA8-DAD7-4CA5-93D7-DFE4695E718A}; YgBlAHMAcQB1AGkAdgBlAGwAQABpAG0AbQBlAG4AcwBlAC4AbgBlAHQA; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:49:51 GMT; UgBvAHUAdABpAG4AZwAgAFEAdQBlAHMAdABpAG8AbgA= x-cr-puzzleid: {38AC2DA8-DAD7-4CA5-93D7-DFE4695E718A} X-MailScan: Found to be clean X-MailScan-From: besquivel@immense.net X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Routing Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:50:16 -0000 Hi, I have a cable modem at my office with a /28 allocated. I have a FreeBSD 6.1 firewall/router in between the cable modem and the switch to other nodes. My question is how could I add static routes to say my web server having an external IP address but still going through the firewall box? NAT is not an option. INET (70.164.48.225/28) -> [xl0] Firewall (70.164.48.226) [xl1] -> [xl0] Web server (70.164.48.227) Thanks in advance. Bret From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 08:20:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B18016A407 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:20:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from root@webserver.lightcomm.com.br) Received: from webserver.lightcomm.com.br (201.7.117.117.lightcomm.com.br [201.7.117.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3D9043CA5 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:19:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@webserver.lightcomm.com.br) Received: from webserver.lightcomm.com.br (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webserver.lightcomm.com.br (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBC8Kq1W030995 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:20:52 -0200 Received: (from root@localhost) by webserver.lightcomm.com.br (8.13.8/8.13.3/Submit) id kBC8Kqv2030991; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:20:52 -0200 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:20:52 -0200 Message-Id: <200612120820.kBC8Kqv2030991@webserver.lightcomm.com.br> From: antivirus@lightcomm.com.br To: Cc: Subject: e-mail recusado X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:20:55 -0000 O e-mail abaixo indicado foi bloqueado pelo servidor da LightComm, por conter um anexo executável ou constante da nossa lista de exclusões. Arquivos executáveis são potencialmente perigosos por constituir meio de propagação de vírus e worms de e-mail. O conteúdo foi DESCARTADO e tanto o remetente como o destinatário foram informados do ocorrido. The following e-mail was blocked by this server because it contains an executable attachment. Executable files are potentially dangerous, as they are used for e-mail virus and worms propagation. Mail headers: Date : Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:20:49 +0100 Subject : Mail Delivery (failure edlight@lightcomm.com.br) From : questions@freebsd.org Return-Path: Received : from lightcomm.com.br (198.Red-213-96-252.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.252.198]) To (system): edlight To (header): edlight@lightcomm.com.br Cc : Bcc : Executables: message.scr Mensagem automática - automatic message Porque meu e-mail foi bloqueado ?: http://www.raspppoe.com.br/antivirus.htm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 09:00:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F8CE16A40F for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:00:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from arwen.teledomenet.gr (arwen.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1DD43CA1 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:59:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from iris ([192.168.1.71]) by arwen.teledomenet.gr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id kBC90im1018855; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:00:44 +0200 From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:00:28 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <014301c71dc2$1e3d1910$5ab74b30$@net> In-Reply-To: <014301c71dc2$1e3d1910$5ab74b30$@net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200612121100.28716.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: "Bret J. Esquivel" Subject: Re: Routing Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:00:48 -0000 On Tuesday 12 December 2006 09:49, Bret J. Esquivel wrote: > Hi, > > > > I have a cable modem at my office with a /28 allocated. I have a FreeBSD 6.1 > firewall/router in between the cable modem and the switch to other nodes. My > question is how could I add static routes to say my web server having an > external IP address but still going through the firewall box? NAT is not an > option. > > > > INET (70.164.48.225/28) -> [xl0] Firewall (70.164.48.226) [xl1] -> [xl0] Web > server (70.164.48.227) You can bridge xl0 and xl1. Then you'll use one address e.g. 70.164.48.225/28 on you xl0 and that will be reachable from your lan too. xl1 doesn't have to have an IP address. Check man if_bridge. But is this the topology? in many cases there is a PPP interface which connects you to the world, a WAN interface. And there is a network routed through this. Something like this: W A N L A N (a.b.c.d/32) <-> (a.b.c.e/32 router d.e.f.a/28) <-> (d.e.f.b/28 other boxes) Hope this help, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 10:16:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4223316A415 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:16:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@yoafrica.com) Received: from ns2.yoafrica.com (ns2.yoafrica.com [66.135.41.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E7943D8A for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:06:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john@yoafrica.com) Received: from panadol.yoafrica.com ([196.44.176.14]) by ns2.yoafrica.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1Gu4XK-0006hq-QG for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:07:02 +0200 Received: from smtp.yoafrica.com ([196.44.176.8]) by panadol.yoafrica.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Gu4XN-000IBX-5l for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:07:11 +0200 Received: from hades.yoafrica.com ([196.44.177.50]) by smtp.yoafrica.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Gu4XL-000OyJ-Qz for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:06:59 +0200 Received: from sysjo by hades.yoafrica.com with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gu4Xj-00052o-Ju for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:07:23 +0200 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:07:23 +0200 From: John Oxley To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061212100723.GA32371@yoafrica.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Cc: Subject: running out of mbuf clusters X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:16:30 -0000 Hi, I'm running a shaper system on a FreeBSD box. It is pushing sustained 8 Mbps. In the messages log I'm getting lots of Dec 11 21:03:54 ritalin /kernel: All mbuf clusters exhausted, please see tuning(7). When I run netstat -m however I get $ netstat -m 1766/5904/80000 mbufs in use (current/peak/max): 1766 mbufs allocated to data 1765/5900/20000 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max) 13276 Kbytes allocated to network (22% of mb_map in use) 30 requests for memory denied 0 requests for memory delayed 0 calls to protocol drain routines Why is it saying its run out of mbuf clusters when it peaked at 5900? The machine is running FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE. The reason for this is that it is a shaper appliance, and it was shipped to us with 4.9 on it. Does anyone have any ideas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 10:23:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4BF16A4C9 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:23:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dgl@kirk.dlee.org) Received: from vms044pub.verizon.net (vms044pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 662F043CB6 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:21:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgl@kirk.dlee.org) Received: from kirk.dlee.org ([138.88.199.146]) by vms044.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JA5008FBOTMHGZ0@vms044.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 04:22:34 -0600 (CST) Received: from kirk.dlee.org (dgl@localhost.dlee.org [127.0.0.1]) by kirk.dlee.org (8.13.6/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kBCAMfqv062341; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:22:41 -0500 (EST envelope-from dgl@kirk.dlee.org) Received: (from dgl@localhost) by kirk.dlee.org (8.13.6/8.12.11/Submit) id kBCAMfbI062340; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:22:41 -0500 (EST envelope-from dgl) Content-return: prohibited Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:22:40 -0500 From: Doug Lee In-reply-to: <457E55E1.7090100@comcast.net> To: Renegade Penguin Mail-followup-to: Doug Lee , Renegade Penguin , FreeBSD Message-id: <20061212102240.GZ10135@kirk.dlee.org> Organization: SSB + BART Group MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline References: <457E55E1.7090100@comcast.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: skype and other *phones X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:23:04 -0000 On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 11:10:25PM -0800, Renegade Penguin wrote: > > >Eric Kjeldergaard wrote: >> >>If you are open to suggestions on other phone systems, I have been very >>much enjoying my gizmo account. (gizmoproject.com) >> >Yes, but the gizmoproject is particularly onerous. Look at the EULA: > >http://www.gizmoproject.com/gizmo-end-user.html > >Michael Robertson is the head of that project, IIRC. Fairly nasty EULA >for using such "open" terms. Can't even redistribute the software. Gizmo turned me severely off a while back when one individual began repeatedly posting messages on the SkypeEnglish mailing list, which is designed to support Skype users who have visual impairments, advertising Gizmo. I saw no evidence that the individual was actually reading our list, and I consider it rude and highly unprofessional to post unrelated messages repeatedly, especially when they directly compete with the focus of the list, especially when posted by someone who doesn't even seem to read the list, and most especially when the person does not even respond to publicly raised concerns over the first two points but keeps right on posting. The posting stopped eventually, but by then I had developed an active disinterest in Gizmo. Questions as to how accessible to blind users Gizmo might be, such questions being at least related to the list's purpose, were not answered by the company as far as I know. Disclaimer: I can not speak to the company's intentions with respect to this kind of behavior, nor to the exact identity of the poster. At the time though, I was convinced it was a company representative. I have no affiliation with either company except (1) as a happy Skype user and (2) as a beta tester for Skype. The latter is covered by an NDA but is voluntary and not paid. -- Doug Lee dgl@dlee.org SSB + BART Group doug.lee@ssbbartgroup.com http://www.ssbbartgroup.com "You must let me try, for a true soldier does not admit defeat before the battle." --Helen Keller (in a letter to the president of Radcliffe College) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 10:50:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3005216A403 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:50:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nagylzs@freemail.hu) Received: from smtp.enternet.hu (smtp.enternet.hu [62.112.192.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6A743CCF for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:49:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nagylzs@freemail.hu) Received: from [80.99.172.190] (helo=[172.16.0.43]) by smtp.enternet.hu with esmtpa (Exim 4) id 1Gu5Dq-000Phx-Ul; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:50:55 +0100 Message-ID: <457E898F.30703@freemail.hu> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:50:55 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Nagy_L=E1szl=F3_Zsolt?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ne'Bahn , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <001601c71d6e$f09c9470$09d3dcc9@bloodlust> In-Reply-To: <001601c71d6e$f09c9470$09d3dcc9@bloodlust> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Fonts on X.Org... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:50:59 -0000 Ne'Bahn írta: > Hi list, how can I add some fonts to the system, for instance: Arial, > Courier New, and so others. I know there are some fonts that cost to > acquire them, but isn't an implementation of these fonts for > the open source arena ??? Please read the documentation for xorg.conf. I'm using several TTF fonts from my Windows system. All you need is to create a new directory, place your fonts there and add the new font path in xorg.conf. Be aware, some font files are not in ttf. AFAIK the Xorg server cannot use ".fon" files. > > PS: I've some docs made in a Windows environment that use fonts I > don't have > on FreeBSD, the replacement is very bad, so OpenOffice offers system > fonts > rather than their fonts (if it has a set), a problem for > portability/compatibility but indeed better for availability. For some reason, I also cannot read some documents because of font problems despite that I have those fonts installed. I used to do "select all" and the change the font to something else; that will make all text readable. Best, Laszlo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 11:57:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D138616A492 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:57:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.1.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10BB343D4C for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:53:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mailspool2.panix.com (mailspool2.panix.com [166.84.1.79]) by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC186CACD5 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:55:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from teddy.fas.com (c-68-58-181-9.hsd1.sc.comcast.net [68.58.181.9]) by mailspool2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EECB1564C0 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:55:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Gu6Dv-0003TN-00 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:55:03 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:55:03 -0500 From: stan To: Free BSD Questions list Message-ID: <20061212115503.GA13120@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: Free BSD Questions list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 06:52:41 up 239 days, 8:46, 1 user, load average: 0.11, 0.05, 0.07 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Subject: Software inventory management X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:57:20 -0000 Sudenly there is an improved desire to keep up to date on the latest security fixes at work. I've got about 50 machines that I manage. OpenBSD, FreeBSD, Linux, Solairs, and HP-UX. I am looking for recomendations for a (hopefully automed), prefereably web based tool to keep up with what versions of OS, OS patches, and ports are installed on these machines. Could anyone with experience using such a tool share their experience, both good and bad for such [ackages? -- Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 12:20:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7007116A407 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:20:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from diri.bris.ac.uk (diri.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1DF43E46 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:17:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by diri.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gu6al-0004XB-4M; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:18:42 +0000 Received: from mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.184.33]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Gu6Za-0007Rp-Md; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:17:26 +0000 Received: from mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost.men.bris.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBCCFRWg040786; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:15:27 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from shterenl@localhost) by mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.4/Submit) id kBCCFRWI040785; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:15:27 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk: shterenl set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:15:27 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Erik Norgaard Message-ID: <20061212121526.GA40735@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Erik Norgaard , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20061207142439.GA20896@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> <4579D1B2.1060202@locolomo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4579D1B2.1060202@locolomo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Spam-Score: -1.3 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: periodic passwd change? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:20:31 -0000 On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 09:57:22PM +0100, Erik Norgaard wrote: > Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > I can't see how to prescribe periodic passwd change, > >only how to set expiry time. At the moment I put the following > >line in the root's crontab: > > > >2 2 2 * * pw usermod shterenl -p "`date '+\%d-\%m-\%Y'`" > > > >This makes a user's passwd expire once a month. > > > >Is there a better way to force users change their passwds periodically? > > You can set it in login.conf, when the password is updated the next > expire is automatically set. I checked login.conf. It seems that passwordtime option has no effect. I did a brief search and found many postings describing the same problem: many options from login.conf have no effect. Perhaps these are the "RESERVED CAPABILITIES' as they are called in the man page. Some people list a patch that supposedly fixes the problem, but I'm not sure if it applies to 6.2-prerelease thatI'm running. thanks anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 11:39:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10CB16A40F for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:39:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arun@dasmax.com) Received: from venus.hiddenservers.com (ns7.hiddenservers.com [64.21.67.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8740B44B71 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:29:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arun@dasmax.com) Received: from cpanel by venus.hiddenservers.com with local (Exim 4.52) id 1Gu5pp-0006ev-U3 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:30:10 -0500 Received: from 137.132.228.5 ([137.132.228.5]) by www.dasmax.com (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:30:09 -0500 Message-ID: <20061212063009.kctzgagozc8gokc8@www.dasmax.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:30:09 -0500 From: arun@dasmax.com To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.3) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - venus.hiddenservers.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [32001 32001] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - dasmax.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:30:54 +0000 Cc: Subject: Backing up FREEBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:39:19 -0000 Hi This is Arun from Singapore. I basically want to know how to back up files if a computer is already running on FREEBSD. Please help me with this as it is urgent. Thanking you Arun From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 13:48:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F39D16A50C for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:48:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.238]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D4343CAA for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:45:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so956328nzh for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:46:49 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=kwuuq1cSsAaT2/y595kDDEnyO6Ff95Wj9HnQSSZ6hmo6kEtZkHLspmPZIx46G9WCjUDIVEXhoaqyMBFggv4ET24wv1S4FrmoV232nAX524udhStHd1zx3IyppptDKwpTNRcZ1fMY0C9elAbHeuSkrPJ+X++HnmVmHkkDyTlMJPc= Received: by 10.65.38.13 with SMTP id q13mr13256976qbj.1165931201576; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:46:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.75.14 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:46:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <17489c7a0612120546x11996604k8c86a3a546067973@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:46:41 -0500 From: "Chad Gross" To: "arun@dasmax.com" In-Reply-To: <20061212063009.kctzgagozc8gokc8@www.dasmax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061212063009.kctzgagozc8gokc8@www.dasmax.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backing up FREEBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:48:31 -0000 The handbook is your friend: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/backup-basics.html and most likely: man dump Chad On 12/12/06, arun@dasmax.com wrote: > > Hi > > This is Arun from Singapore. I basically want to know how to back up > files if a computer is already running on FREEBSD. Please help me with > this as it is urgent. > > Thanking you > Arun > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 13:49:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 251EF16A4B3 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:49:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2203043D36 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:47:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:48:47 -0500 id 00056407.457EB33F.00004FEB Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:48:46 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: "Mike Murphree" Message-Id: <20061212084846.235bfd68.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <60158.69.73.127.132.1165900548.squirrel@webmail.dogbark.com> References: <60158.69.73.127.132.1165900548.squirrel@webmail.dogbark.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dummynet fragmenting packets X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:49:47 -0000 In response to "Mike Murphree" : > > Having an issue on a 5.3 system using ipfw and dummynet to create a > bandwidth limited and large latency pipe for a mpeg video stream. If I > pass the packets between the two NICs without routing through a dummynet > pipe, it's fine. If I route it through a pipe, it's fragmenting each > packet (client requested 1468 byte packets) into two packets, the second > packet with an offset of 1440 bytes. Does anyone have any idea why it's > doing this, and have a solution to this problem? As a general rule, fragmenting occurs when packets move between different networks with different MTUs. I.e. the originating network has a larger MTU, so the packet must be broken up in order to pass it on to the network with the smaller MTU. Now that that's out of the way, I can see 3 possibilities as to why dummynet is fragmenting packets: 1) Dummynet has the wrong information about what the MTUs are on your networks and is fragmenting the packets needlessly. 2) Dummynet is altering the packets, they become larger and then no longer fit in the MTU. 3) The endpoints are doing path-MTU-discovery, but when you put dummynet between them you somehow break PMTUD. To narrow this down, you'll need to determine what the MTUs are on each network and whether they're being respected, is the total size of the reassembled fragments the same as when the packet came in, and whether or not PMTUD is in use, and whether something in dummynet or any related filtering rules is breaking it. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 14:34:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C80016A50D for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:34:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@budostore.de) Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de (mo-p00-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9507444363 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:15:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from news@budostore.de) Received: from nor75-5-82-235-173-77.fbx.proxad.net (nor75-5-82-235-173-77.fbx.proxad.net [82.235.173.77]) by post.webmailer.de (klopstock mo54) (RZmta 3.9) with ESMTP id iBCBs2tL05a87F for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:17:13 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:17:13 +0100 (MET) From: Karl Sinn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20061211125628.D0C0.GERARD@seibercom.net> <200612120015.30099.news@budostore.de> In-Reply-To: <200612120015.30099.news@budostore.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612121509.55982.news@budostore.de> X-RZG-AUTH: ibDpgOm8RLcSc5zBxTj4 Subject: Re: trying to install jre SOLVED X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:34:25 -0000 Hi, Am Dienstag, 12. Dezember 2006 00:22 schrieb Karl Sinn: > I'll send a message when it's done. It's done. Thanks for all the help. Karl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 14:47:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC4C416A51F for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:47:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tshadwick@oss-solutions.com) Received: from moogle.hksilver.net (mail.hksilver.net [208.231.66.99]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53AAA4430B for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:40:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tshadwick@oss-solutions.com) Received: from [172.16.30.8] (chibi.shadwick.home [172.16.30.8]) (authenticated bits=0) by moogle.hksilver.net (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBCEfaa8090991 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:41:39 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tshadwick@oss-solutions.com) Message-ID: <457EBF9B.2090902@oss-solutions.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:41:31 -0600 From: Tony Shadwick User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5.0.2 (Macintosh/20060310) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chad Gross References: <20061212063009.kctzgagozc8gokc8@www.dasmax.com> <17489c7a0612120546x11996604k8c86a3a546067973@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <17489c7a0612120546x11996604k8c86a3a546067973@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "arun@dasmax.com" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backing up FREEBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:47:57 -0000 As with what he said. :) Dump and Restore are your friends. Also, in a crunch: tar -z -c -f /path/to/your/backup.tar.gz /filesystem Do that once for each mounted filesystem, and make sure backup.tar.gz lives on another system, perhaps on an nfs mount. Chad Gross wrote: > The handbook is your friend: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/backup-basics.html > > > and most likely: > > man dump > > Chad > > On 12/12/06, arun@dasmax.com wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> This is Arun from Singapore. I basically want to know how to back up >> files if a computer is already running on FREEBSD. Please help me with >> this as it is urgent. >> >> Thanking you >> Arun >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 14:49:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D07216A4CA for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:49:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from data2@cablespeed.com) Received: from admin2.cablespeed.com (mail.cablespeed.com [216.15.205.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270EF441B9 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:43:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from data2@cablespeed.com) Received: from dummy.name; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:44:17 -0600 Message-ID: <05b101c71dfc$152b1ea0$05dc3818@mdm246a3e4f6fc> From: "Jon Krause" To: "stan" , "Free BSD Questions list" References: <20061212115503.GA13120@teddy.fas.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:44:52 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Cc: Subject: Re: Software inventory management X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:49:18 -0000 From: "stan" Subject: Software inventory management : : Sudenly there is an improved desire to keep up to date on the latest : security fixes at work. I've got about 50 machines that I manage. OpenBSD, : FreeBSD, Linux, Solairs, and HP-UX. : : I am looking for recomendations for a (hopefully automed), prefereably : web based tool to keep up with what versions of OS, OS patches, and ports : are installed on these machines. : : Could anyone with experience using such a tool share their experience, : both good and bad for such [ackages? : I am not sure about any 'automated' solutions, but Request Tracker could fill the need. Have a look at: http://bestpractical.com/rt/features.html It's avalable in ports: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/www/rt36/pkg-descr With this extension (AssetTracker): http://atwiki.chaka.net/ Good Luck, Jon : -- : Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. : (Dennis Ritchie) : : _______________________________________________ : freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list : http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions : To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 15:06:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7636C16A510 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:06:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from probsdorg@yahoo.com) Received: from web52409.mail.yahoo.com (web52409.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.48.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 127FA43C9D for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:04:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from probsdorg@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 65269 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Dec 2006 15:05:19 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=qShu59MPhnskJRAEGucsw0FL+I3Ygz8eh9DUwEgR/rUKSmUiFgmbB67yaHIqcCKTg85BiVBxSgp2Js/5ITfAdJXd8cpKBtuZklIBhKTlJVMrJoZvCKdqVmN309J4UZp1C1kz7QQorehRXO8sAcTc2dWKLdmRfvadNERixvsFKM0= ; Message-ID: <20061212150519.65264.qmail@web52409.mail.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: cYJwG5MVM1nK82EJZIBtcnY_DDX5OBM7aUK4QRVT7LvYhA8WwWC6kskyl4hknhPfZbO8D1ET7Muwzp2r0JhUhObcf2gfT__JL_7SwhkyCmwd1ODzEnZL8_0PA_6lKRLK Received: from [208.180.144.84] by web52409.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:05:18 PST Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:05:18 -0800 (PST) From: probsd org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: RE: FreeBSD Backup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:06:28 -0000 This is assuming you have another account on another freebsd/linux box with a significant amount of space. Works great on a live filesystem. I use /, /var, /tmp, and /usr as examples. dump -L -0f - /usr | ssh -C login@other-freebsd-server "cat > /usr/home/login/usr.dump" dump -L -0f - /tmp | ssh -C login@other-freebsd-server "cat > /usr/home/login/tmp.dump" dump -L -0f - /var | ssh -C login@other-freebsd-server "cat > /usr/home/login/var.dump" dump -L -0f - / | ssh -C login@other-freebsd-server "cat > /usr/home/login/root.dump" Then to restore: cd /usr ; ssh -C login@other-freebsd-server "cat /usr/home/login/usr.dump" | restore -rf - cd / ; ssh -C login@other-freebsd-server "cat /usr/home/login/root.dump" | restore -rf - cd /var ; ssh -C login@other-freebsd-server "cat /usr/home/login/var.dump" | restore -rf - cd /tmp ; ssh -C login@other-freebsd-server "cat /usr/home/login/tmp.dump" | restore -rf - michael --------------------------------- Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 15:29:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D53016A501 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:29:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B1443DC8 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:25:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBCFNkIv071773; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:23:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kBCFNkj9071772; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:23:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:23:46 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Peter Matulis Message-ID: <20061212152346.GA71718@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <656980.80393.qm@web60118.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <656980.80393.qm@web60118.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: disklabel and usb device X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:29:32 -0000 On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 09:26:31PM -0500, Peter Matulis wrote: > I am having trouble viewing my USB compact flash reader with my FBSD > 5.5 system. I have done so in the past. For some reason I can no > longer do so. > > This is what I'm getting: > > # disklabel /dev/da0s1 > disklabel: /dev/da0s1: no valid label found That is the message I get when I forget to 'su' before trying to run disklabel/bsdlabel. By the way, I don't think there is a disklabel in FreeBSD 5.5. It is bsdlabel, but I suppose that is just a typing thing in your message above. Below you mention the card has an OpenBSD file system. I have never used that, so don't know if it makes any difference. ////jerry > > # fdisk /dev/da0s1 > ******* Working on device /dev/da0s1 ******* > parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: > cylinders=249 heads=64 sectors/track=32 (2048 blks/cyl) > > parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: > cylinders=249 heads=64 sectors/track=32 (2048 blks/cyl) > > Media sector size is 512 > Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 > Information from DOS bootblock is: > The data for partition 1 is: > sysid 108 (0x6c),(unknown) > start 1684955424, size 1701998624 (831054 Meg), flag a > beg: cyl 368/ head 82/ sector 37; > end: cyl 357/ head 97/ sector 35 > The data for partition 2 is: > sysid 110 (0x6e),(unknown) > start 1998616933, size 544105832 (265676 Meg), flag 73 > beg: cyl 97/ head 115/ sector 32; > end: cyl 107/ head 121/ sector 32 > The data for partition 3 is: > sysid 121 (0x79),(QNX4.x 3rd part) > start 538988361, size 538976288 (263172 Meg), flag 72 > beg: cyl 356/ head 101/ sector 33; > end: cyl 0/ head 13/ sector 10 > The data for partition 4 is: > sysid 83 (0x53),(DM6 Aux3) > start 1394614304, size 21337 (10 Meg), flag 53 > beg: cyl 333/ head 89/ sector 19; > end: cyl 339/ head 68/ sector 15 > > > >From logs: > > kernel: umass0: SanDisk ImageMate 8 in 1, rev 2.00/91.44, addr 2 > > > The card contains an OpenBSD filesystem. > > Peter > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 15:51:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B54D16A501 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:51:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howie@thingy.com) Received: from post1.network-i.net (antigua.network-i.net [212.21.121.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 195D643E8D for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:45:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from howie@thingy.com) Received: (qmail 23577 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2006 15:46:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.1.1.134?) (212.21.99.52) by post1.network-i.net with SMTP; 12 Dec 2006 15:46:20 -0000 Message-ID: <457ECF46.6020803@thingy.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:48:22 +0000 From: Howard Jones User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20061212115503.GA13120@teddy.fas.com> <05b101c71dfc$152b1ea0$05dc3818@mdm246a3e4f6fc> In-Reply-To: <05b101c71dfc$152b1ea0$05dc3818@mdm246a3e4f6fc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Software inventory management X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:51:46 -0000 From: "stan" > Subject: Software inventory management > > > : > : Sudenly there is an improved desire to keep up to date on the latest > : security fixes at work. I've got about 50 machines that I manage. OpenBSD, > : FreeBSD, Linux, Solairs, and HP-UX. > : > : I am looking for recomendations for a (hopefully automed), prefereably > : web based tool to keep up with what versions of OS, OS patches, and ports > : are installed on these machines. > : > : Could anyone with experience using such a tool share their experience, > : both good and bad for such [ackages? > : > You might also want to look at RANCID, which is mainly aimed at routers, but since it works by comparing a text file with the previous day's text file, you shouldn't have too much trouble getting it to do servers too, assuming you can get something to do the actual reporting (could be as simple as a concatenation of pkg_info, dmidecode, pciconf -l, uname -a and a few others). http://www.shrubbery.net/rancid/ Best Regards, Howie (maybe will try this myself now...) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 16:01:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3FF16A4D4 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:01:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FEA43E50 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:59:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBCFvOm4071907; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:57:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kBCFvONm071906; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:57:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:57:24 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: arun@dasmax.com Message-ID: <20061212155724.GB71718@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20061212063009.kctzgagozc8gokc8@www.dasmax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061212063009.kctzgagozc8gokc8@www.dasmax.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backing up FREEBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:01:31 -0000 On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 06:30:09AM -0500, arun@dasmax.com wrote: > Hi > > This is Arun from Singapore. I basically want to know how to back up > files if a computer is already running on FREEBSD. Please help me with > this as it is urgent. It depends a little on what media you have available to store a backup. The long time traditional media would be tape. I still use it for some things. DAT tape is economical, but somewhat unreliable. DLT and LTO are very nice and seem to be reliable, but quite expensive. Many people are now buying large extra disk drives just to contain backups. That works well for short term failure recovery, but is less convenient for archival (very long term) backups. Disks are also less useful for extra large file systems - ones that are larger than the largest disk you can put on the machine. It is easier to to multiple media units on tape. Optical media works OK if the amount of data you will back up is small. The capacity of CD and DVD is small compared to modern disk and tape. Probably for disaster recovery, I would be inclined to suggest backups to disk if your backup requirements are withing the capacity of a drive you can make work on the system you wish to back up. So, once you have decided and acquired the backup media, then you have several choices for software. The most complete and general solution is to use dump(8) to make the backups. It handles all situations and types of files, directories, links and file ownership/permissions correctly. Nothing else does it 100%. You can easily write to either tape or disk with dump. Dump files are read by restore(8). The only weakness of dump is that it only works on whole file systems. That is great for most backups. But, if you want to back up just a few files or directories within a file system, then you might want to use tar(1) (with the -p flag to preserve as much of permissions as possible). Another thing to consider is to design your partitions such that the things you want to back up are put in a particular partition (file system) and things you will never want to back up are in a different partition. Then dump will get just what you want. That is one reason (not the only) for making /tmp a separate partition, for example. You don't generally bother to back up /tmp. Also, you may not want to back up '/' and /usr more than once or twice after an upgrade if you put users home directories elsewhere and move /usr/local to a different, frequently backed up partition. With just a little thought to layout, the whole file system limitation becomes moot and dump is _the_ choice. If you write dumps to a big disk, note that you should make a single large file system on it and write the dumps to files that include the dump date - something like: dump 0af /dumpdisk/root20061212 / presuming you have mounted that big disk file system as '/dumpdisk' and that you are dumping root on December 12, 2006. You will want to make a way of deleting obsolete dumps as well. ////jerry > > Thanking you > Arun > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 16:16:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732C016A415 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:16:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nomadlogic@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60ADE43CA0 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:15:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nomadlogic@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1544515uge for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:16:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Oashomi6+TuPanRt1QxjPCmyDkMR/5EThTqAYbTVBoHbCqy3MXjbx/Q9BVbjBN4PvCHsv3mmua8b6M0S94New2NBZXwswEIeh59RGe9gI3Ub8ArIPhpRLpUnQ6B1LqpgjLR0KdttIP+THWjkYPDJOJDjEZbGfghpFGIHjgsV8zI= Received: by 10.78.201.2 with SMTP id y2mr2705573huf.1165940214277; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:16:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.195.14 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:16:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <57d710000612120816t3f19e3e3y8ea9ed447a22b1e7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:16:54 -0800 From: "pete wright" To: "John Oxley" In-Reply-To: <20061212100723.GA32371@yoafrica.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061212100723.GA32371@yoafrica.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: running out of mbuf clusters X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:16:56 -0000 On 12/12/06, John Oxley wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running a shaper system on a FreeBSD box. It is pushing sustained 8 > Mbps. In the messages log I'm getting lots of > > Dec 11 21:03:54 ritalin /kernel: All mbuf clusters exhausted, please see > tuning(7). > > When I run netstat -m however I get > $ netstat -m > 1766/5904/80000 mbufs in use (current/peak/max): > 1766 mbufs allocated to data > 1765/5900/20000 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max) > 13276 Kbytes allocated to network (22% of mb_map in use) > 30 requests for memory denied > 0 requests for memory delayed > 0 calls to protocol drain routines > > > Why is it saying its run out of mbuf clusters when it peaked at 5900? > The machine is running FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE. The reason for this is that > it is a shaper appliance, and it was shipped to us with 4.9 on it. > hmm...don't have a 4.x box handy but on 6.1-RELEASE "man tuning" turns this up: " kern.ipc.nmbclusters may be adjusted to increase the number of network mbufs the system is willing to allocate. Each cluster represents approx- imately 2K of memory, so a value of 1024 represents 2M of kernel memory reserved for network buffers. " yikes, can't remember if 4.x allows you to tune this via sysctl or if you have to define it in your kernel config. in any event if you type "sysctl kern.ipc.nmbclusters" that should report you maximum mbuf's that can be allocated. I am guessing you may have to increase this value. -pete -- ~~o0OO0o~~ Pete Wright www.nycbug.org NYC's *BSD User Group From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 16:29:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3681816A403 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:29:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D4443CA0 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:27:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 1460 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2006 16:28:59 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 12 Dec 2006 16:28:59 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 4A2CF2842F; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:28:58 -0500 (EST) To: Nicolas Blais References: <200612111947.34413.nb_root@videotron.ca> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:28:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200612111947.34413.nb_root@videotron.ca> (Nicolas Blais's message of "Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:47:21 -0500") Message-ID: <44slfl3wol.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD FAMP on a mini-itx/embedded platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:29:00 -0000 Nicolas Blais writes: > I'm looking to make a light FreeBSD-Apache-MySQL-PHP system out of a VIA EN > 5000 system. It would replace my home file/web server which currently runs > 24h/7d with a silent and energy-wise bundle. I did something similar ( http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/photos/2006/05.May/Epia/thumbnails.html ) and I'm quite happy with it. The one you are looking at it twice as fast and pulls about 40% less peak power. [It is *very* hard to get comparison numbers for power consumed by machines at idle, but take it for granted that it will be a fair amount less than peak.] > I would also like to take advange of the C7 processor's Padlock feature (SSL > encryption). I believe FreeBSD supports it? Yes. It may not be particularly speedy (at least, on my C3), but it keeps up with (at least) multiple megabits of traffic per second. Perhaps more important, it offloads the CPU to do other things at the same time. > I'm not looking for 3D performance or the such for this file server, but I > would expect it to atleast keep up with the current server network-wise. Are > my expectations unfounded? I don't think so. Obviously, it depends on how sophisticated your web applications are, but in general, I would expect it to perform better than *any* PC-class machine did four years ago. > sidenote: This would be my 7th BSD machine in the house (and this is not > counting my Vmware guests!) :) I thought you were *replacing* an old machine with it? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 16:40:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8987F16A47E for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:40:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from achilles.leela.ws (achilles.leela.ws [66.207.162.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A5D43CE9 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:38:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.0.193] ([158.145.111.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by achilles.leela.ws (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBCGdR8u034406 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:39:28 -0900 (AKST) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Message-ID: <457EDB44.5010808@mac.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:39:32 -0900 From: "Peter A. Giessel" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061025 Thunderbird/1.5.0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: probsd org References: <20061212150519.65264.qmail@web52409.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20061212150519.65264.qmail@web52409.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Backup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:40:48 -0000 On 2006/12/12 6:05, probsd org seems to have typed: > dump -L -0f - / | ssh -C login@other-freebsd-server "cat > /usr/home/login/root.dump The handbook also suggests something to the effect of: /sbin/dump -0uaL -f - / | gzip -2 | ssh login@other-freebsd-server dd of=/www/dumpdir/dump-root.gz From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 17:16:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B514016A504 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:16:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7907643E93 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:10:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [172.23.170.141] (helo=anti-virus02-08) by smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GuBA2-0004kh-5Z; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:11:22 +0000 Received: from [80.192.25.35] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by asmtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GuBA1-00028b-9U; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:11:21 +0000 Message-ID: <457EE2B8.1030900@dial.pipex.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:11:20 +0000 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061205 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20061212150519.65264.qmail@web52409.mail.yahoo.com> <457EDB44.5010808@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <457EDB44.5010808@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD Backup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:16:42 -0000 Peter A. Giessel wrote: >On 2006/12/12 6:05, probsd org seems to have typed: > >> dump -L -0f - / | ssh -C login@other-freebsd-server "cat > /usr/home/login/root.dump >> > >The handbook also suggests something to the effect of: >/sbin/dump -0uaL -f - / | gzip -2 | ssh login@other-freebsd-server dd >of=/www/dumpdir/dump-root.gz > If you want to offload the gzip to the other server (if it's faster, for example) then /sbin/dump -0uaL -f - / | ssh login@other-freebsd-server "gzip -9 > /usr/home/login/root.dump" would also fly. Obviously gzip compression can be tweaked as you see fit, but personally I've never found any reason to use anything but 9 :-) I did tests with the subtly different cat and dd methods of naming the remote file and found no discernible timing difference. I find it handy to encode the dump level (e.g. .0 .1) in the remote name. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 17:27:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF4016A514 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:27:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Received: from raptor.centroin.com (asmtp.centroin.com [64.251.27.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50BF43FC1 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:18:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Received: from trex.centroin.com.br (trex.centroin.com.br [200.225.63.134]) (authenticated bits=0) by raptor.centroin.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/CIP SMTP HOST) with ESMTP id kBCHK4eD099201 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:20:11 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:20:02 -0200 (BRST) From: scuba@centroin.com.br Sender: mpsouza@trex.centroin.com.br To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061212151337.T98405@trex.centroin.com.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: POP3 conection throttle X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:27:34 -0000 Hi All, Does anybody know any wrapper to popper server to throttle the per user connection rate? I would like to avoid some users to connect the pop3 server, every 30 secs, i.e. Something that returns "no new messages", between a configurable time. Thank you, - Marcelo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 17:31:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E740F16A50D for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:31:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raggen@passagen.se) Received: from av12-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (av12-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF7243CA4 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:24:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from raggen@passagen.se) Received: by av12-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 4290037F1D; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:25:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp4-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (smtp4-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.92]) by av12-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33AF37EE1; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:25:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (81-231-90-251-no41.tbcn.telia.com [81.231.90.251]) by smtp4-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ADE537E42; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:25:55 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <457EE5A6.3040102@passagen.se> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:23:50 +0100 From: Roger Olofsson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tony Shadwick , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20061212063009.kctzgagozc8gokc8@www.dasmax.com> <17489c7a0612120546x11996604k8c86a3a546067973@mail.gmail.com> <457EBF9B.2090902@oss-solutions.com> In-Reply-To: <457EBF9B.2090902@oss-solutions.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Backing up FREEBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:31:45 -0000 Hello, If you have a spare machine with the diskspace neeeded then you might want to consider rsync over ssh. Rsync can do incremental backups, which can be nice and timesaving. There's plenty to read about it if you Google for "Freebsd backing up rsync ssh ports". Tony Shadwick skrev: > As with what he said. :) Dump and Restore are your friends. > > Also, in a crunch: > > tar -z -c -f /path/to/your/backup.tar.gz /filesystem > > Do that once for each mounted filesystem, and make sure backup.tar.gz > lives on another system, perhaps on an nfs mount. > > Chad Gross wrote: >> The handbook is your friend: >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/backup-basics.html >> >> >> and most likely: >> >> man dump >> >> Chad >> >> On 12/12/06, arun@dasmax.com wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> This is Arun from Singapore. I basically want to know how to back up >>> files if a computer is already running on FREEBSD. Please help me with >>> this as it is urgent. >>> >>> Thanking you >>> Arun >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >>> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 17:52:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588D816A407 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:52:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B641143CCF for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:50:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin05-en2 [10.13.10.150]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout05/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kBCHqIAq001479; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:52:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from [17.214.13.96] (a17-214-13-96.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin05/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kBCHqFmC008734; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:52:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <200612120014.22107.mapsware@prodigy.net.mx> References: <20061203174849.GA4561@host.my.domain> <20061204154222.GA636@host.my.domain> <200612120014.22107.mapsware@prodigy.net.mx> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <4448FE68-D588-4ABA-84E2-504582EFD80F@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:52:15 -0800 To: Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-scanned: yes Cc: a@zeos.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How does my computer work with an empty arp table? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:52:21 -0000 On Dec 11, 2006, at 11:14 PM, Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez wrote: >> Yes, you are right, I forgot about PPP. Many thanks. > > Also, the ARP table only contain info of your subnet The ARP table only contains information about machines on the directly connected collision domain(s). It's entirely possible to run multiple IP subnets on the same hub or switch, and even ARP for machines outside the configured subnet on one machine even when no IP routing information is available for that other subnet... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 18:08:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B75C16A416 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:08:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C44443F2B for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:02:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBCI3QaU085311; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:03:26 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id kBCI3QmU085308; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:03:26 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:03:26 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: stan In-Reply-To: <20061212115503.GA13120@teddy.fas.com> Message-ID: <20061212105846.Q85275@wonkity.com> References: <20061212115503.GA13120@teddy.fas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:03:26 -0700 (MST) Cc: Free BSD Questions list Subject: Re: Software inventory management X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:08:54 -0000 On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, stan wrote: > Sudenly there is an improved desire to keep up to date on the latest > security fixes at work. I've got about 50 machines that I manage. OpenBSD, > FreeBSD, Linux, Solairs, and HP-UX. > > I am looking for recomendations for a (hopefully automed), prefereably > web based tool to keep up with what versions of OS, OS patches, and ports > are installed on these machines. > > Could anyone with experience using such a tool share their experience, > both good and bad for such [ackages? Look at Nagios.org. It already has plugins that will check things like disk space, and there may be something similar for software versions. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 18:09:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B7916A51E for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:09:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A381743F15 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:02:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin05-en2 [10.13.10.150]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout11/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kBCI34Zw003012; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:03:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from [17.214.13.96] (a17-214-13-96.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin05/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kBCI32wR013290; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:03:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20061212151337.T98405@trex.centroin.com.br> References: <20061212151337.T98405@trex.centroin.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:03:01 -0800 To: scuba@centroin.com.br X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-scanned: yes Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: POP3 conection throttle X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:09:08 -0000 On Dec 12, 2006, at 9:20 AM, scuba@centroin.com.br wrote: > Does anybody know any wrapper to popper server to throttle the per > user connection rate? > I would like to avoid some users to connect the pop3 server, every > 30 secs, i.e. > Something that returns "no new messages", between a configurable time. User education is the best solution. You're not going to improve matters much by adding a POP3 proxy which refuses rapid connections compared with simply having them hit the normal POP3 daemon. On the other hand, you will see an improvement if you switch from using POP3 to using IMAP, as the latter protocol is more efficient about mailbox updates. (At least, if the client is sanely written.) -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 18:22:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4295616A6D7 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:22:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B577343EF0 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:19:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin05-en2 [10.13.10.150]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout06/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kBCIKxWn001000; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:21:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from [17.214.13.96] (a17-214-13-96.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin05/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kBCIKumj021352; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:20:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20061203174849.GA4561@host.my.domain> <20061204154222.GA636@host.my.domain> <200612120014.22107.mapsware@prodigy.net.mx> <4448FE68-D588-4ABA-84E2-504582EFD80F@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:20:55 -0800 To: Javier Henderson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-scanned: yes Cc: freeBSD List Subject: Re: How does my computer work with an empty arp table? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:22:40 -0000 On Dec 12, 2006, at 10:08 AM, Javier Henderson wrote: >> The ARP table only contains information about machines on the >> directly connected collision domain(s). > > Are you sure it's not the same broadcast domain? Yes. The term "collision domain" predates the wide deployment of switches, and switches have to treat ARPs in a special fashion: > A computer on port A on a switch would be on a different collision > domain than a computer on port B on the same switch, yet as long as > they're on the same VLAN (ie, broadcast domain), both would have > each other in their resepctive ARP tables if they were exchanging > Ethernet traffic. ...in particular, ARPOP_REQUEST traffic will be propagated to every port on the switch which is configured to be a part of that VLAN, or, quite possibly, other ports including "trunk ports" or sometimes even ports configured on other VLANs. [1] Many switches will do this for all ethernet packets with an ether_dhost (ie, destination MAC) of all-ones. -- -Chuck [1]: And yes, Virginia, this has negatory implications if your security relies on VLANs to actually be completely hidden from each other. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 18:30:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E33A16A4A7 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:30:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njt@ayvali.org) Received: from starfish.geekisp.com (mail.geekisp.com [216.168.135.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A356743E12 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:25:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from njt@ayvali.org) Received: (qmail 18996 invoked by uid 1003); 12 Dec 2006 18:27:00 -0000 Received: from clam.int.geekisp.com (HELO clam.geekisp.com) (192.168.4.38) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 12 Dec 2006 18:27:00 -0000 Received: from clam.geekisp.com (njt@localhost.geekisp.com [127.0.0.1]) by clam.geekisp.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kBCIR0l3011206 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:27:00 -0500 (EST) Received: (from njt@localhost) by clam.geekisp.com (8.13.8/8.13.3/Submit) id kBCIQxhT022963 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:26:59 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: clam.geekisp.com: njt set sender to njt@ayvali.org using -f Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:26:59 -0500 From: "N.J. Thomas" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061212182659.GC2335@ayvali.org> References: <20061212063009.kctzgagozc8gokc8@www.dasmax.com> <17489c7a0612120546x11996604k8c86a3a546067973@mail.gmail.com> <457EBF9B.2090902@oss-solutions.com> <457EE5A6.3040102@passagen.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <457EE5A6.3040102@passagen.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: Re: Backing up FREEBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:30:15 -0000 * Roger Olofsson [2006-12-12 18:23:50 +0100]: > If you have a spare machine with the diskspace neeeded then you might > want to consider rsync over ssh. Rsync can do incremental backups, > which can be nice and timesaving. If you are going to go the rsync route, I recommend you check out rsnapshot, it's in /usr/ports/sysutils/rsnapshot, and their site is here: http://www.rsnapshot.org/ Thomas -- N.J. Thomas njt@ayvali.org Etiamsi occiderit me, in ipso sperabo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 18:44:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B7216A506 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:44:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david+dated+1166380924.a0d38f@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (3s1.com [209.161.205.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9B143D90 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:41:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1166380924.a0d38f@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 3s1.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBCIg4kC022533 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:42:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1166380924.a0d38f@skytracker.ca) Received: (from david@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kBCIg4Vq022532 for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:42:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1166380924.a0d38f@skytracker.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: 3s1.com: david set sender to david+dated+1166380924.a0d38f@skytracker.ca using -f Received: by 3s1.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:42:03 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:42:03 -0500 To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061212184203.GA8832@skytracker.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.5 (Fettercairn) From: David Banning Cc: Subject: NFS question - which is the server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:44:45 -0000 I have a FBSD box servering several users. We want to mount a stand-alone FBSD box to access the files on it. I am thinking NFS. When installing NFS, the stand-alone box would be the NFS server, correct? And multi-user box would be the NFS client? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 19:06:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B037F16A40F for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:06:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nomadlogic@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60B743D53 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:59:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nomadlogic@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i28so965947wra for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:00:47 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=EwtpCfGwtZGNGUt1yz+zj9bkwRFhzRP84xi1w6J6ODZQ540JakB6Or/e9Smxdwhb9BtZ8w3xY2Z1Gmsy4M77BgY9jW0DJP3F2mb7BGfhbATVXNHIDCQ0Vji+uDRJHnXg4VUcl5ZAvCaL86A648yOTefj2UzhjxXKd2qNPE27uxg= Received: by 10.78.157.8 with SMTP id f8mr4285725hue.1165950046966; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:00:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.195.14 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:00:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <57d710000612121100q4dbe6e74ue613c180e311943e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:00:46 -0800 From: "pete wright" To: "David Banning" In-Reply-To: <20061212184203.GA8832@skytracker.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061212184203.GA8832@skytracker.ca> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS question - which is the server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:06:32 -0000 On 12/12/06, David Banning wrote: > I have a FBSD box servering several users. We want to mount a stand-alone > FBSD box to access the files on it. I am thinking NFS. > > When installing NFS, the stand-alone box would be the NFS server, correct? > And multi-user box would be the NFS client? in this model the NFS server will be the node in which you export your data to other machines. I.e. the machine which holds the files you want to access. The client will be the machine that needs to access said files. in your case the multiuser box will be the client. -pete -- ~~o0OO0o~~ Pete Wright www.nycbug.org NYC's *BSD User Group From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 19:13:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E46616A407 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:13:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58FF43F1D for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:02:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:03:11 -0500 id 00056412.457EFCEF.00007316 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:03:11 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: David Banning Message-Id: <20061212140311.a3f5ecca.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20061212184203.GA8832@skytracker.ca> References: <20061212184203.GA8832@skytracker.ca> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS question - which is the server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:13:14 -0000 In response to David Banning : > I have a FBSD box servering several users. We want to mount a stand-alone > FBSD box to access the files on it. I am thinking NFS. > > When installing NFS, the stand-alone box would be the NFS server, correct? > And multi-user box would be the NFS client? You're question is worded somewhat ambiguously. I'm unclear as to which server is doing what, however: * The server that _has_ the files will be the NFS server. * Any system that accesses those files across the network is an NFS client. Hope that helps. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 20:26:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6868116A505 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:26:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eoghanj@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7356441BE for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:14:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eoghanj@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1601670uge for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:15:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:content-type:to:from:subject:date:x-mailer; b=SCh3/7oAQcvwpl+MdJNMy7pde8/OhbRidUz5p8AMfY4tiZEr4aT1vqJkeeODThlc6aJF+VXSNUE2shzK0yvW+OvSx8rhzD0yYXYMKxLSVGlPTV+PnlczoDFyT/bCeolMMTaaR9uoTUKFoV4fL8LYsceEiph2QlBNQkvx0K3Xa3Q= Received: by 10.67.22.2 with SMTP id z2mr12308135ugi.1165954547862; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:15:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.34? ( [194.125.105.35]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e34sm9277640ugd.2006.12.12.12.15.46; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:15:47 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd ORG From: eoghan Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:15:44 +0000 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: dbus_enable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:26:19 -0000 Hi Im seeing some dbus_enable warnings when booting... saying its not set properly in rc.conf I dont see these warnings in dmesg though. I assume its coming from my option: gnome_enable="YES" here is the full contents of my /etc/rc.conf # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Wed Jul 19 20:56:08 2006 # Created: Wed Jul 19 20:56:08 2006 # Enable network daemons for user convenience. # Please make all changes to this file, not to /etc/defaults/rc.conf. # This file now contains just the overrides from /etc/defaults/rc.conf. hostname="nathaniel" ifconfig_rl0="DHCP" ipv6_enable="YES" keymap="us.iso" moused_enable="YES" sshd_enable="YES" usbd_enable="YES" mysql_enable="YES" webmin_enable="YES" gdm_enable="YES" ntpd_enable="YES" gnome_enable="YES" Should I have gdm_enable and gnome_enable, or one or the other... could that be causing the dbus_enable problem? Thanks Eoghan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 20:42:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4BC16A403 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:42:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ysidhu@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8C643CC9 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:40:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ysidhu@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i28so987970wra for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:42:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=SVxVGyIMfRfeC76HnO3gQkwXOx3OVXZNjDopBtm97WK1/mZrqG9QzQs7+pmMfFagWON9jVnv+z+ie9TBouEVRoJQQBSE4HSTjr4mDBh4/hVZCGZumHProKZ2znmLuBrHglLHpUoFmm++++Ja6MVkEyJ+7BDfQYQlxwbPL+Ee99g= Received: by 10.78.128.11 with SMTP id a11mr2851102hud.1165956126099; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:42:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.149.7 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:42:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:42:05 -0800 From: "Y Sidhu" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Cannot Load FreeBSD 6.2 64 bit and maybe other versions as well X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:42:18 -0000 An update for some who may care. I tried loading Live Linux distros: Puppy, DSL and STD. They load fine but don't see a network interface. Also installed Fedora 5 Linux Distro and same - no ethernet interface seen. It has been a while but I recall that Windows XP pro will not boot. Anybody have any ideas on what to try next? I am pretty much spent. This is a new evaluation box and so I have no problems sending it back to the SuperMicro VAR. I want to figure this thing out just for the challenge of it. Know what I mean? Yudhvir ========= On 12/11/06, Y Sidhu wrote: > > I am a newbie and have gone though past posts and have been looking at the > last couple of weeks of posts go by. I have not seen anything similar to my > problem. I cannot load an OS except under ACPI-Disabled. I can boot into > safe mode, but cannot configure a working network interface. Therefore, I > cannot send in a dmesg output. Here is some data I have gathered: > > Details > a. SuperMicro X7DBR-8+ / X7DBR-I+ > b. Intel 3.2 GHz Xeon dual core dual cpu, K8 class cpu > c. BIOS - Phoenix (just upgraded to 1.2A from 1.1C) The upgrade has had > no affect on this problem as far as I can tell. > d. Dual Ethernet - Intel Pro/1000 Network Connection Version 6.2.9. em0 > is IRQ 5 at device 0.0 on pci4. em1 is IRQ 11 at device 0.1 on pci4. Also, > when I am booted in safe mode, in dmesg, there is an entry "em IRQ 10 at > device 2.0 on pci5." > e. SCSI - Adaptec version 4.3. AIC 7902 Ultra 320, PCI-X ID=7 > f. One 73 GB Seagate Cheetah 10K.7 SCSI hard drive, Model ST3207LC. I > have tested this and another drive out without any media errors. The Adaptec > adapter sees the drive and capacity fine. > > g. When I try to boot normally, the messages scroll by and the system > freezes at: "waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle" > > h. When I disable ACPI either under the BIOS's settings or select Disable > ACPI when loading FreeBSD, the system loads but I cannot get the ethernet > interface to come up. ifconfig shows all the right values. I have also used > route delete default and route add default - to no avail. > There is a message which pops up saying "em0: watchdog timeout - resetting" > Looking into dmesg output, I see: em0 link state changed to UP and em0 link > state DOWN repeat over and over again. > > i. 1 GB ram and have tested it with memtest 86 without any errors. > > My Gut > a. Something is causing a good old fashioned IRQ conflict. I have 1 drive > and 1 cdrom on this machine. > b. The SCSI ACPI79xx driver is not there or not loading > > Hoping > I am looking for a nudge in the right direction. > > -- > Yudhvir Singh Sidhu > -- Yudhvir Singh Sidhu 408 375 3134 cell From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 20:50:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E362716A57F for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:50:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=johnl=0494a64d7d@iecc.com) Received: from xuxa.iecc.com (xuxa.iecc.com [208.31.42.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C61E43CB2 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:48:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from prvs=johnl=0494a64d7d@iecc.com) Received: (qmail 8593 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2006 20:50:04 -0000 Received: from simone.iecc.com (208.31.42.47) by mail2.iecc.com with QMQP; 12 Dec 2006 20:50:04 -0000 Date: 12 Dec 2006 20:50:04 -0000 Message-ID: <20061212205004.35548.qmail@simone.iecc.com> From: John Levine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20061212063808.GA31424@thought.org> Organization: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: kline@tao.thought.org Subject: Re: can I use perl substitution to handle hex chars? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:50:13 -0000 > Seems like lots of files I get off the net use \x80\x98 or the > like to denote various non-ascii characters. Is there a way to > use perl (or any other unix tool) to replace > \x\x with, say whatever ASCII or ISO-8859-1 > character or characters? perl -pe 's/\\x(\w\w)/chr(hex("$1"))/eg' R's, John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 20:52:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269F616A54F for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:52:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from besquivel@immense.net) Received: from mail1.immense.net (mail.immense.net [216.93.243.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C7D343CCD for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:50:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from besquivel@immense.net) Received: from bretlaptop (rain.net-shapers.com [216.83.242.211]) by mail1.immense.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045C01D7842 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:51:48 -0600 (CST) From: "Bret J Esquivel" To: Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:52:03 -0600 Message-ID: <008701c71e2f$60ea9130$22bfb390$@net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcceL18hwj25jqziS9KeuaIkNRIBgg== Content-Language: en-us X-MailScan: Found to be clean X-MailScan-From: besquivel@immense.net X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Routing Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:52:16 -0000 Hi, I have a cable modem at my office with a /28 allocated. I have a FreeBSD 6.1 firewall/router in between the cable modem and the switch to other nodes. My question is how could I add static routes to say my web server having an external IP address but still going through the firewall box? NAT is not an option. INET (70.164.48.225/28) -> [xl0] Firewall (70.164.48.226) [xl1] -> [xl0] Web server (70.164.48.227) Thanks in advance. Bret From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 20:57:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D56B16A47B for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:57:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout7.cac.washington.edu (mxout7.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0700843CC8 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:56:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.141]) by mxout7.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBCKvV9c013032 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:57:31 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.5.99] (nilakantha.cs.washington.edu [128.208.5.99]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBCKvUIu015085 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:57:31 -0800 Message-ID: <457F17BA.6060807@u.washington.edu> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:57:30 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2006.12.12.123932 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: dbus_enable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:57:34 -0000 eoghan wrote: > Hi > Im seeing some dbus_enable warnings when booting... saying its not set > properly in rc.conf > I dont see these warnings in dmesg though. I assume its coming from my > option: > gnome_enable="YES" > > here is the full contents of my /etc/rc.conf > > # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Wed Jul 19 20:56:08 2006 > # Created: Wed Jul 19 20:56:08 2006 > # Enable network daemons for user convenience. > # Please make all changes to this file, not to /etc/defaults/rc.conf. > # This file now contains just the overrides from /etc/defaults/rc.conf. > hostname="nathaniel" > ifconfig_rl0="DHCP" > ipv6_enable="YES" > keymap="us.iso" > moused_enable="YES" > sshd_enable="YES" > usbd_enable="YES" > mysql_enable="YES" > webmin_enable="YES" > gdm_enable="YES" > ntpd_enable="YES" > gnome_enable="YES" > > Should I have gdm_enable and gnome_enable, or one or the other... > could that be causing the dbus_enable problem? > > Thanks > Eoghan Could you provide the errors you receive in a reply email please? Thanks, -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 21:02:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 073C516A47C for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:02:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from achilles.leela.ws (achilles.leela.ws [66.207.162.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0A443CD4 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:00:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.0.193] ([158.145.111.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by achilles.leela.ws (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBCL2EPD035322 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:02:15 -0900 (AKST) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Message-ID: <457F18DA.5060008@mac.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:02:18 -0900 From: "Peter A. Giessel" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061025 Thunderbird/1.5.0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Y Sidhu References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cannot Load FreeBSD 6.2 64 bit and maybe other versions as well X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:02:24 -0000 On 2006/12/12 11:42, Y Sidhu seems to have typed: >> a. SuperMicro X7DBR-8+ / X7DBR-I+ Seems that others have had problems with SuperMicro boards: http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64/motherboards.html *** QUOTE *** Boots stock SMP kernel. UP kernel must be booted in "safe mode" *** END QUOTE *** Have you tried booting up the stock SMP kernel? Basically: boot into safe mode or single user mode cd /usr/src make buildkernel KERNCONF=SMP make installkernel KERNCONF=SMP reboot Assuming that you installed a "developer" version of FreeBSD (that includes the source code). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 21:14:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9945B16A5D0 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:14:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eoghanj@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F00043CB3 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:12:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eoghanj@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1614753uge for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:14:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=Yq/pVXF4CvNDLx0HYwZz/DK+UW9W7MUELYsJSpLLJf0Ukisd53rkB6nmJKj4b6aEl9yv2Ri2ny3ixbhTZfwKIBh31Y3boIv26lTHgvPI+HnJ5rRD/mqXDE8SC83Ag5bsj+QuD3k5v8PnmrxKAirgMie6yEztUAnimmgjIYr2jxk= Received: by 10.66.232.9 with SMTP id e9mr32330ugh.1165958051276; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:14:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.34? ( [194.125.105.35]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 29sm7248270uga.2006.12.12.13.14.10; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:14:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <457F17BA.6060807@u.washington.edu> References: <457F17BA.6060807@u.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <8C2F27BD-EE20-451B-9E9D-D0259AED53BD@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: eoghan Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:14:08 +0000 To: Garrett Cooper X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dbus_enable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:14:36 -0000 On 12 Dec 2006, at 20:57, Garrett Cooper wrote: > eoghan wrote: >> Hi >> Im seeing some dbus_enable warnings when booting... saying its not >> set properly in rc.conf >> I dont see these warnings in dmesg though. I assume its coming >> from my option: >> gnome_enable="YES" >> >> here is the full contents of my /etc/rc.conf >> >> # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Wed Jul 19 20:56:08 2006 >> # Created: Wed Jul 19 20:56:08 2006 >> # Enable network daemons for user convenience. >> # Please make all changes to this file, not to /etc/defaults/rc.conf. >> # This file now contains just the overrides from /etc/defaults/ >> rc.conf. >> hostname="nathaniel" >> ifconfig_rl0="DHCP" >> ipv6_enable="YES" >> keymap="us.iso" >> moused_enable="YES" >> sshd_enable="YES" >> usbd_enable="YES" >> mysql_enable="YES" >> webmin_enable="YES" >> gdm_enable="YES" >> ntpd_enable="YES" >> gnome_enable="YES" >> >> Should I have gdm_enable and gnome_enable, or one or the other... >> could that be causing the dbus_enable problem? >> >> Thanks >> Eoghan > Could you provide the errors you receive in a reply email please? > Thanks, > -Garrett Hi Garrett They appear at the very end of booting, just before I get the gnome login... I got this from the system log: Dec 12 19:44:03 nathaniel root: /etc/rc: WARNING: $dbus_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Dec 12 19:44:03 nathaniel root: /etc/rc: WARNING: $dbus_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Dec 12 19:44:03 nathaniel root: /etc/rc: WARNING: $polkitd_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Thanks Eoghan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 21:29:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4766816A407 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:29:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB07B43EFD for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:22:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [10.35.4.65] (65.4-35-10-static.chueca.wifi [10.35.4.65]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F255F2E024; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:23:15 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <457F1D38.60202@locolomo.org> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:20:56 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erik Norgaard , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20061207142439.GA20896@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> <4579D1B2.1060202@locolomo.org> <20061212121526.GA40735@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20061212121526.GA40735@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms080406060402090301060401" Cc: Subject: Re: periodic passwd change? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:29:59 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms080406060402090301060401 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 09:57:22PM +0100, Erik Norgaard wrote: >> Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >>> I can't see how to prescribe periodic passwd change, >>> only how to set expiry time. At the moment I put the following >>> line in the root's crontab: >>> >>> 2 2 2 * * pw usermod shterenl -p "`date '+\%d-\%m-\%Y'`" >>> >>> This makes a user's passwd expire once a month. >>> >>> Is there a better way to force users change their passwds periodically? >> You can set it in login.conf, when the password is updated the next >> expire is automatically set. > > I checked login.conf. It seems that passwordtime option has no effect. > I did a brief search and found many postings describing the same problem: > many options from login.conf have no effect. Perhaps these are the > "RESERVED CAPABILITIES' as they are called in the man page. Some people > list a patch that supposedly fixes the problem, but I'm not sure if it > applies to 6.2-prerelease thatI'm running. > > thanks > anton did you remember to cap_mkdb after? from the man page: "Whenever changes to this, or the user's ~/.login_conf, file are made, the modifications will not be picked up until cap_mkdb(1) is used to compile the file into a database." Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org --------------ms080406060402090301060401 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIK6DCC BXAwggRYoAMCAQICBEVUK6IwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwMTELMAkGA1UEBhMCREsxDDAKBgNV BAoTA1REQzEUMBIGA1UEAxMLVERDIE9DRVMgQ0EwHhcNMDYxMTE1MDgzMTU0WhcNMDgxMTE1 MDkwMTU0WjB1MQswCQYDVQQGEwJESzEpMCcGA1UEChMgSW5nZW4gb3JnYW5pc2F0b3Jpc2sg dGlsa255dG5pbmcxOzAUBgNVBAMUDUVyaWsgTvhyZ2FhcmQwIwYDVQQFExxQSUQ6OTgwMi0y MDAyLTItNTQ0MzY5NzY5MzE1MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQC1/K6+GVcF UvoWJpyfhzWbu8qEOB8jU17A0dpmts7RT+ODkYq0lxJCcvvdSXNQQurvYwaPISA+EMRy+rIm rjhoyxhsM9w/XC7gELqkr1XbGt3wR0KLr5ZcRfD4HqrWM1Eh1OYxTXKod6Ox/FAqzDAy91x8 XCZzsHtiBCdgMSYxqwIDAQABo4ICzjCCAsowDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgP4MCsGA1UdEAQkMCKA DzIwMDYxMTE1MDgzMTU0WoEPMjAwODExMTUwOTAxNTRaMIIBNwYDVR0gBIIBLjCCASowggEm BgoqgVCBKQEBAQEDMIIBFjAvBggrBgEFBQcCARYjaHR0cDovL3d3dy5jZXJ0aWZpa2F0LmRr L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkwgeIGCCsGAQUFBwICMIHVMAoWA1REQzADAgEBGoHGRm9yIGFudmVuZGVs c2UgYWYgY2VydGlmaWthdGV0IGfmbGRlciBPQ0VTIHZpbGvlciwgQ1BTIG9nIE9DRVMgQ1As IGRlciBrYW4gaGVudGVzIGZyYSB3d3cuY2VydGlmaWthdC5kay9yZXBvc2l0b3J5LiBCZW3m cmssIGF0IFREQyBlZnRlciB2aWxr5XJlbmUgaGFyIGV0IGJlZ3LmbnNldCBhbnN2YXIgaWZ0 LiBwcm9mZXNzaW9uZWxsZSBwYXJ0ZXIuMEEGCCsGAQUFBwEBBDUwMzAxBggrBgEFBQcwAYYl aHR0cDovL29jc3AuY2VydGlmaWthdC5kay9vY3NwL3N0YXR1czAgBgNVHREEGTAXgRVub3Jn YWFyZEBsb2NvbG9tby5vcmcwgYQGA1UdHwR9MHswS6BJoEekRTBDMQswCQYDVQQGEwJESzEM MAoGA1UEChMDVERDMRQwEgYDVQQDEwtUREMgT0NFUyBDQTEQMA4GA1UEAxMHQ1JMMTU1NzAs oCqgKIYmaHR0cDovL2NybC5vY2VzLmNlcnRpZmlrYXQuZGsvb2Nlcy5jcmwwHwYDVR0jBBgw FoAUYLWF7FZkfhIZJ2cdUBVLc647+RIwHQYDVR0OBBYEFPd+a0ceJ9JmK934UXsB3G0mjv+f MAkGA1UdEwQCMAAwGQYJKoZIhvZ9B0EABAwwChsEVjcuMQMCA6gwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAD ggEBAE9KhX+l/ZcnhvGPhHyWnJspyCXSiuqZ+GlgMdcKXtlu8kXsqNzfDe9qSs93++zJS+HT vAW0QgyIxjY1VpgCqgyjU8e2d2D1eSRMDB09WViZk8oZkvOy0Mq3yy//CLSw3gQbXNZF+Yt+ htss+FD+idACVyRBQqlcHuaxjguyzZkK0fGBN5H5nsklDySQCU7X0i3egeIiL7zlV3cjp9KT 12tNG4jfQTaSUzBkz0R+x+Jcdyp6AI9Qg3H1iGDDI58aCTY5ohQBpDsUcLr6U842IACNCeub qDP6nDo5lnMEXwGH/RO8r4supCf5wrNRjqEX/vokUzB5QfDGtmxxZkycaaQwggVwMIIEWKAD AgECAgRFVCuiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMDExCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRLMQwwCgYDVQQKEwNUREMx FDASBgNVBAMTC1REQyBPQ0VTIENBMB4XDTA2MTExNTA4MzE1NFoXDTA4MTExNTA5MDE1NFow dTELMAkGA1UEBhMCREsxKTAnBgNVBAoTIEluZ2VuIG9yZ2FuaXNhdG9yaXNrIHRpbGtueXRu aW5nMTswFAYDVQQDFA1FcmlrIE74cmdhYXJkMCMGA1UEBRMcUElEOjk4MDItMjAwMi0yLTU0 NDM2OTc2OTMxNTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAtfyuvhlXBVL6Fiacn4c1 m7vKhDgfI1NewNHaZrbO0U/jg5GKtJcSQnL73UlzUELq72MGjyEgPhDEcvqyJq44aMsYbDPc P1wu4BC6pK9V2xrd8EdCi6+WXEXw+B6q1jNRIdTmMU1yqHejsfxQKswwMvdcfFwmc7B7YgQn YDEmMasCAwEAAaOCAs4wggLKMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwID+DArBgNVHRAEJDAigA8yMDA2MTEx NTA4MzE1NFqBDzIwMDgxMTE1MDkwMTU0WjCCATcGA1UdIASCAS4wggEqMIIBJgYKKoFQgSkB AQEBAzCCARYwLwYIKwYBBQUHAgEWI2h0dHA6Ly93d3cuY2VydGlmaWthdC5kay9yZXBvc2l0 b3J5MIHiBggrBgEFBQcCAjCB1TAKFgNUREMwAwIBARqBxkZvciBhbnZlbmRlbHNlIGFmIGNl cnRpZmlrYXRldCBn5mxkZXIgT0NFUyB2aWxr5XIsIENQUyBvZyBPQ0VTIENQLCBkZXIga2Fu IGhlbnRlcyBmcmEgd3d3LmNlcnRpZmlrYXQuZGsvcmVwb3NpdG9yeS4gQmVt5nJrLCBhdCBU REMgZWZ0ZXIgdmlsa+VyZW5lIGhhciBldCBiZWdy5m5zZXQgYW5zdmFyIGlmdC4gcHJvZmVz c2lvbmVsbGUgcGFydGVyLjBBBggrBgEFBQcBAQQ1MDMwMQYIKwYBBQUHMAGGJWh0dHA6Ly9v Y3NwLmNlcnRpZmlrYXQuZGsvb2NzcC9zdGF0dXMwIAYDVR0RBBkwF4EVbm9yZ2FhcmRAbG9j b2xvbW8ub3JnMIGEBgNVHR8EfTB7MEugSaBHpEUwQzELMAkGA1UEBhMCREsxDDAKBgNVBAoT A1REQzEUMBIGA1UEAxMLVERDIE9DRVMgQ0ExEDAOBgNVBAMTB0NSTDE1NTcwLKAqoCiGJmh0 dHA6Ly9jcmwub2Nlcy5jZXJ0aWZpa2F0LmRrL29jZXMuY3JsMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFGC1hexW ZH4SGSdnHVAVS3OuO/kSMB0GA1UdDgQWBBT3fmtHHifSZivd+FF7AdxtJo7/nzAJBgNVHRME AjAAMBkGCSqGSIb2fQdBAAQMMAobBFY3LjEDAgOoMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQBPSoV/ pf2XJ4bxj4R8lpybKcgl0orqmfhpYDHXCl7ZbvJF7Kjc3w3vakrPd/vsyUvh07wFtEIMiMY2 NVaYAqoMo1PHtndg9XkkTAwdPVlYmZPKGZLzstDKt8sv/wi0sN4EG1zWRfmLfobbLPhQ/onQ AlckQUKpXB7msY4Lss2ZCtHxgTeR+Z7JJQ8kkAlO19It3oHiIi+85Vd3I6fSk9drTRuI30E2 klMwZM9EfsfiXHcqegCPUINx9YhgwyOfGgk2OaIUAaQ7FHC6+lPONiAAjQnrm6gz+pw6OZZz BF8Bh/0TvK+LLqQn+cKzUY6hF/76JFMweUHwxrZscWZMnGmkMYICKjCCAiYCAQEwOTAxMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJESzEMMAoGA1UEChMDVERDMRQwEgYDVQQDEwtUREMgT0NFUyBDQQIERVQrojAJ BgUrDgMCGgUAoIIBRzAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEP Fw0wNjEyMTIyMTIwNTZaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBRzE2/h1ak5yAuAUbQGAXFwJSKtLjBI BgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxOzA5MDExCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRLMQwwCgYDVQQKEwNUREMxFDASBgNVBAMT C1REQyBPQ0VTIENBAgRFVCuiMEoGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMTugOTAxMQswCQYDVQQGEwJESzEM MAoGA1UEChMDVERDMRQwEgYDVQQDEwtUREMgT0NFUyBDQQIERVQrojBSBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8x RTBDMAoGCCqGSIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUrDgMC BzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASBgFfdmHBTLrIfbxdB9VaaqUvmRy/H Hx45F99OkaKJFV6ub15CztM7mHyAqvsjr86Lmnew6TLnZNS08d/d1U14t2I7H4ct3DHFRiI7 T2X43o1iH9/wRN2oBn1ciMv3/3aFS8H4EyJsU5BeSiF+REqt+nRDUF68sgd5WbJchPHixDQe AAAAAAAA --------------ms080406060402090301060401-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 21:44:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F3B16A4B3 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:44:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (www.unsane.co.uk [85.233.185.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283E243E88 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:26:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from [10.0.0.100] (crayfish.unsane.co.uk [10.0.0.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBCLSNmo034027 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:28:24 GMT (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <457F1EE1.6020600@unsane.co.uk> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:28:01 +0000 From: Vince Hoffman User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061024) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bret J Esquivel References: <008701c71e2f$60ea9130$22bfb390$@net> In-Reply-To: <008701c71e2f$60ea9130$22bfb390$@net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Routing Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:44:08 -0000 Bret J Esquivel wrote: > Hi, > > > > I have a cable modem at my office with a /28 allocated. I have a FreeBSD 6.1 > firewall/router in between the cable modem and the switch to other nodes. My > question is how could I add static routes to say my web server having an > external IP address but still going through the firewall box? NAT is not an > option. > > > > INET (70.164.48.225/28) -> [xl0] Firewall (70.164.48.226) [xl1] -> [xl0] Web > server (70.164.48.227) > > Only really one choice if you really don't want NAT (i've run web servers with a static nat many times though so i wouldn't rule it out if i were you) Routing wouldn't work in this scenario as you dont have enough control, you would have to bridge the interfaces on your firewall. man if_bridge. Bridging xl0 and xl1 on your firewall will make it act like a 2 port hub, but pf ,ipfw and ipf can still filter packets going across it. Personally in this situation i'd just add the IPs to the freebsd box and set static NATs up for anything that needs to be externally visible but a bridging firewall should work too. Vince > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Bret > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 21:44:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3599016A522 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:44:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25AB44261 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:33:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.141]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBCLYwQM006563 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:34:58 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.5.99] (nilakantha.cs.washington.edu [128.208.5.99]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBCLYvH0021039 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:34:58 -0800 Message-ID: <457F2081.2090800@u.washington.edu> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:34:57 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <457F17BA.6060807@u.washington.edu> <8C2F27BD-EE20-451B-9E9D-D0259AED53BD@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8C2F27BD-EE20-451B-9E9D-D0259AED53BD@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2006.12.12.131932 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: dbus_enable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:44:41 -0000 eoghan wrote: > On 12 Dec 2006, at 20:57, Garrett Cooper wrote: > >> eoghan wrote: >>> Hi >>> Im seeing some dbus_enable warnings when booting... saying its not >>> set properly in rc.conf >>> I dont see these warnings in dmesg though. I assume its coming from >>> my option: >>> gnome_enable="YES" >>> >>> here is the full contents of my /etc/rc.conf >>> >>> # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Wed Jul 19 20:56:08 2006 >>> # Created: Wed Jul 19 20:56:08 2006 >>> # Enable network daemons for user convenience. >>> # Please make all changes to this file, not to /etc/defaults/rc.conf. >>> # This file now contains just the overrides from /etc/defaults/rc.conf. >>> hostname="nathaniel" >>> ifconfig_rl0="DHCP" >>> ipv6_enable="YES" >>> keymap="us.iso" >>> moused_enable="YES" >>> sshd_enable="YES" >>> usbd_enable="YES" >>> mysql_enable="YES" >>> webmin_enable="YES" >>> gdm_enable="YES" >>> ntpd_enable="YES" >>> gnome_enable="YES" >>> >>> Should I have gdm_enable and gnome_enable, or one or the other... >>> could that be causing the dbus_enable problem? >>> >>> Thanks >>> Eoghan >> Could you provide the errors you receive in a reply email please? >> Thanks, >> -Garrett > > Hi Garrett > They appear at the very end of booting, just before I get the gnome > login... > I got this from the system log: > Dec 12 19:44:03 nathaniel root: /etc/rc: WARNING: $dbus_enable is not > set properly - see rc.conf(5). > Dec 12 19:44:03 nathaniel root: /etc/rc: WARNING: $dbus_enable is not > set properly - see rc.conf(5). > Dec 12 19:44:03 nathaniel root: /etc/rc: WARNING: $polkitd_enable is > not set properly - see rc.conf(5). > Thanks > Eoghan Eoghan, Interesting. I thought there was a default for dbus_enable in /etc/defaults/rc.conf. Try putting in dbus_enable=yes in /etc/rc.conf; it's useful for automatically detecting hardware in gnome and interprocess communication in many different programs. Not sure what you want to do about polkitd_enable though.. It looks like you might need to enable that for dbus (based on this mailing-list thread and the references to dbus in the C source code): . -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 21:45:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F1016A56E for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:45:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brian@levie.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from smtp3.freeserve.com (smtp3.wanadoo.co.uk [193.252.22.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E703443E6 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:36:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brian@levie.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3207.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9AE37900008C for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:38:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from brianlevie (user-514d2437.l1.c2.dsl.pol.co.uk [81.77.36.55]) by mwinf3207.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id EB00F9000085 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:38:09 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20061212213809962.EB00F9000085@mwinf3207.me.freeserve.com From: "Brian Levie" To: Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:38:19 -0000 Message-ID: <000001c71e35$d826cd30$37244d51@brianlevie> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Failure to compile X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:45:07 -0000 I recently installed FreeBSD 6.1, and copied many Unix files with no problems at all. However when I try to run the C compiler which worked = fine with Unix, I get the error message '/usr/bin/cc Exec format error = Binary file not executable'. I tried changing permissions and owner with no = change. Any suggestions or won't the unix C compiler not work with FreeBSD? =20 Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 21:45:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DED016A597 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:45:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73DF4440A for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:37:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:38:24 -0500 id 00056412.457F2150.000086A9 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:38:24 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: "Bret J Esquivel" Message-Id: <20061212163824.f067e80c.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <008701c71e2f$60ea9130$22bfb390$@net> References: <008701c71e2f$60ea9130$22bfb390$@net> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Routing Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:45:22 -0000 In response to "Bret J Esquivel" : > > I have a cable modem at my office with a /28 allocated. I have a FreeBSD 6.1 > firewall/router in between the cable modem and the switch to other nodes. My > question is how could I add static routes to say my web server having an > external IP address but still going through the firewall box? NAT is not an > option. > > INET (70.164.48.225/28) -> [xl0] Firewall (70.164.48.226) [xl1] -> [xl0] Web > server (70.164.48.227) I could have swore that someone else recommended bridging, so I won't bother to bring it up. The other option is to set that system up as a router, and build a proper routing table. Your ISP will need to be involved so they know to route traffic to your subnet through your gateway system. You need to enable forwarding in /etc/rc.conf. Then you'll need to subnet your range properly. Something like: 70.164.48.225/29 -> external 70.164.48.241/29 -> internal Then set your external interface on the router to 70.164.48.226 and the internal interface to 70.164.48.242. They you can use 70.164.48.243 - 249 on the inside. Configuring the FreeBSD machine as a bridging firewall will simplify the process, however, and is the approach I would recommend. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 22:12:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA24A16A49E for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:12:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eoghanj@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE05E4421A for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:51:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eoghanj@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1622922uge for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:52:35 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=j2BHHsxWIt9LHWxDDwnVtaeTGi3g5DMI+lJKpqeMDo/mFxMXRlPTTZwwvhCQrwZ5Y1EqQbGiWNsrX9+nXyC/rBwkkF2tWgNyAXlpMG9e/dJz4Qph3JLPIuDPzI2esl/YmWYZCBx/hMjBx1EHGM3bTMfAGzTikVksBTgdOEbmGnI= Received: by 10.66.216.20 with SMTP id o20mr52922ugg.1165960354931; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:52:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.34? ( [194.125.105.35]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 32sm9294109ugf.2006.12.12.13.52.33; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:52:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <457F2081.2090800@u.washington.edu> References: <457F17BA.6060807@u.washington.edu> <8C2F27BD-EE20-451B-9E9D-D0259AED53BD@gmail.com> <457F2081.2090800@u.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: eoghan Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:52:32 +0000 To: Garrett Cooper X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dbus_enable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:12:05 -0000 On 12 Dec 2006, at 21:34, Garrett Cooper wrote: > eoghan wrote: >> On 12 Dec 2006, at 20:57, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> >>> eoghan wrote: >>>> Hi >>>> Im seeing some dbus_enable warnings when booting... saying its >>>> not set properly in rc.conf >>>> I dont see these warnings in dmesg though. I assume its coming >>>> from my option: >>>> gnome_enable="YES" >>>> >>>> here is the full contents of my /etc/rc.conf >>>> >>>> # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Wed Jul 19 20:56:08 2006 >>>> # Created: Wed Jul 19 20:56:08 2006 >>>> # Enable network daemons for user convenience. >>>> # Please make all changes to this file, not to /etc/defaults/ >>>> rc.conf. >>>> # This file now contains just the overrides from /etc/defaults/ >>>> rc.conf. >>>> hostname="nathaniel" >>>> ifconfig_rl0="DHCP" >>>> ipv6_enable="YES" >>>> keymap="us.iso" >>>> moused_enable="YES" >>>> sshd_enable="YES" >>>> usbd_enable="YES" >>>> mysql_enable="YES" >>>> webmin_enable="YES" >>>> gdm_enable="YES" >>>> ntpd_enable="YES" >>>> gnome_enable="YES" >>>> >>>> Should I have gdm_enable and gnome_enable, or one or the >>>> other... could that be causing the dbus_enable problem? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Eoghan >>> Could you provide the errors you receive in a reply email please? >>> Thanks, >>> -Garrett >> >> Hi Garrett >> They appear at the very end of booting, just before I get the >> gnome login... >> I got this from the system log: >> Dec 12 19:44:03 nathaniel root: /etc/rc: WARNING: $dbus_enable is >> not set properly - see rc.conf(5). >> Dec 12 19:44:03 nathaniel root: /etc/rc: WARNING: $dbus_enable is >> not set properly - see rc.conf(5). >> Dec 12 19:44:03 nathaniel root: /etc/rc: WARNING: $polkitd_enable >> is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). >> Thanks >> Eoghan > Eoghan, > Interesting. I thought there was a default for dbus_enable in / > etc/defaults/rc.conf. Try putting in dbus_enable=yes in /etc/ > rc.conf; it's useful for automatically detecting hardware in gnome > and interprocess communication in many different programs. Not sure > what you want to do about polkitd_enable though.. It looks like you > might need to enable that for dbus (based on this mailing-list > thread and the references to dbus in the C source code): lists.freedesktop.org/archives/hal-commit/2006-April/002376.html>. > -Garrett Hi Garrett Thanks, will try that. I believe that the gnome_enable starts all these processes, though I could be wrong... and I didnt get these messages till I added gnome_enable. Eoghan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 22:56:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E6416A416 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:56:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-unix@earthlink.net) Received: from pop-siberian.atl.sa.earthlink.net (pop-siberian.atl.sa.earthlink.net [207.69.195.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D91144084 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:11:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd-unix@earthlink.net) Received: from fl-71-54-28-212.dhcp.embarqhsd.net ([71.54.28.212] helo=kt.weeeble.com) by pop-siberian.atl.sa.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1GuFrF-0003u0-00; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:12:18 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:12:16 -0500 From: Randy Pratt To: eoghan Message-Id: <20061212171216.665bcd1c.bsd-unix@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <8C2F27BD-EE20-451B-9E9D-D0259AED53BD@gmail.com> References: <457F17BA.6060807@u.washington.edu> <8C2F27BD-EE20-451B-9E9D-D0259AED53BD@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.10 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dbus_enable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:56:25 -0000 On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:14:08 +0000 eoghan wrote: > On 12 Dec 2006, at 20:57, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > > eoghan wrote: > >> Hi > >> Im seeing some dbus_enable warnings when booting... saying its not > >> set properly in rc.conf > >> I dont see these warnings in dmesg though. I assume its coming > >> from my option: > >> gnome_enable="YES" > >> > >> here is the full contents of my /etc/rc.conf > >> > >> # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Wed Jul 19 20:56:08 2006 > >> # Created: Wed Jul 19 20:56:08 2006 > >> # Enable network daemons for user convenience. > >> # Please make all changes to this file, not to /etc/defaults/rc.conf. > >> # This file now contains just the overrides from /etc/defaults/ > >> rc.conf. > >> hostname="nathaniel" > >> ifconfig_rl0="DHCP" > >> ipv6_enable="YES" > >> keymap="us.iso" > >> moused_enable="YES" > >> sshd_enable="YES" > >> usbd_enable="YES" > >> mysql_enable="YES" > >> webmin_enable="YES" > >> gdm_enable="YES" > >> ntpd_enable="YES" > >> gnome_enable="YES" > >> > >> Should I have gdm_enable and gnome_enable, or one or the other... > >> could that be causing the dbus_enable problem? > >> > >> Thanks > >> Eoghan > > Could you provide the errors you receive in a reply email please? > > Thanks, > > -Garrett > > Hi Garrett > They appear at the very end of booting, just before I get the gnome > login... > I got this from the system log: > Dec 12 19:44:03 nathaniel root: /etc/rc: WARNING: $dbus_enable is not > set properly - see rc.conf(5). > Dec 12 19:44:03 nathaniel root: /etc/rc: WARNING: $dbus_enable is not > set properly - see rc.conf(5). > Dec 12 19:44:03 nathaniel root: /etc/rc: WARNING: $polkitd_enable is > not set properly - see rc.conf(5). You might find this recent thread useful: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2006-October/015587.html Randy -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 22:57:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065B216A539 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:57:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B666144214 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:11:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 648D21A3C1C; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:13:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CFDEC5144C; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:12:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:12:59 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Brian Levie Message-ID: <20061212221259.GA21661@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <000001c71e35$d826cd30$37244d51@brianlevie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000001c71e35$d826cd30$37244d51@brianlevie> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Failure to compile X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:57:07 -0000 --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 09:38:19PM -0000, Brian Levie wrote: > I recently installed FreeBSD 6.1, and copied many Unix files with no > problems at all. However when I try to run the C compiler which worked fine > with Unix, I get the error message '/usr/bin/cc Exec format error Binary > file not executable'. I tried changing permissions and owner with no change. > Any suggestions or won't the unix C compiler not work with FreeBSD? What do you mean by "Unix"? Kris --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFfylrWry0BWjoQKURAiNMAKCErpA8b4o3IHn96is1IfFyE7ctGACg24da SI88X1cHTdVSH44XWTOIoQA= =CgVY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 22:59:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B51BC16A403 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:59:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eoghanj@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756A544401 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:17:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eoghanj@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1628576uge for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:18:52 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=WCxilbH/lHABsgsTehBWzaXnRvYOUZ3jAah/8nr4svV9syJMsBCldiraEhKmupkN9+2Qw3e5sl75H6H3MqTmB6D4jDC6O0M4M5BY8VmPwWmjOCTcIQWUoNeh9kmlU+BRfwiCM15f7ooN5YcdJotyKkMq4LcVldM4fTR5YpUsWXo= Received: by 10.66.221.6 with SMTP id t6mr101299ugg.1165961932497; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:18:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.34? ( [194.125.105.35]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i39sm9416008ugd.2006.12.12.14.18.51; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:18:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20061212171216.665bcd1c.bsd-unix@earthlink.net> References: <457F17BA.6060807@u.washington.edu> <8C2F27BD-EE20-451B-9E9D-D0259AED53BD@gmail.com> <20061212171216.665bcd1c.bsd-unix@earthlink.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: eoghan Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:18:50 +0000 To: Randy Pratt X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dbus_enable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:59:36 -0000 On 12 Dec 2006, at 22:12, Randy Pratt wrote: > eoghan wrote: > >> On 12 Dec 2006, at 20:57, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> >>> eoghan wrote: >>>> Hi >>>> Im seeing some dbus_enable warnings when booting... saying its not >>>> set properly in rc.conf >>>> I dont see these warnings in dmesg though. I assume its coming >>>> from my option: >>>> gnome_enable="YES" >>>> >>>> here is the full contents of my /etc/rc.conf >>>> >>>> # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Wed Jul 19 20:56:08 2006 >>>> # Created: Wed Jul 19 20:56:08 2006 >>>> # Enable network daemons for user convenience. >>>> # Please make all changes to this file, not to /etc/defaults/ >>>> rc.conf. >>>> # This file now contains just the overrides from /etc/defaults/ >>>> rc.conf. >>>> hostname="nathaniel" >>>> ifconfig_rl0="DHCP" >>>> ipv6_enable="YES" >>>> keymap="us.iso" >>>> moused_enable="YES" >>>> sshd_enable="YES" >>>> usbd_enable="YES" >>>> mysql_enable="YES" >>>> webmin_enable="YES" >>>> gdm_enable="YES" >>>> ntpd_enable="YES" >>>> gnome_enable="YES" >>>> >>>> Should I have gdm_enable and gnome_enable, or one or the other... >>>> could that be causing the dbus_enable problem? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Eoghan >>> Could you provide the errors you receive in a reply email please? >>> Thanks, >>> -Garrett >> >> Hi Garrett >> They appear at the very end of booting, just before I get the gnome >> login... >> I got this from the system log: >> Dec 12 19:44:03 nathaniel root: /etc/rc: WARNING: $dbus_enable is not >> set properly - see rc.conf(5). >> Dec 12 19:44:03 nathaniel root: /etc/rc: WARNING: $dbus_enable is not >> set properly - see rc.conf(5). >> Dec 12 19:44:03 nathaniel root: /etc/rc: WARNING: $polkitd_enable is >> not set properly - see rc.conf(5). > > You might find this recent thread useful: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2006-October/ > 015587.html > > Randy Thanks I have added dbus_enable to my rc.conf and I am not getting that warning anymore Eoghan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 23:02:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E0616A403 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:02:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85FAC44BBD for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:24:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from srv.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GuG4g-000Naj-46; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 01:26:10 +0300 Received: from bsam by ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GuG5g-0000sp-F6; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 01:27:12 +0300 To: "Brian Levie" References: <000001c71e35$d826cd30$37244d51@brianlevie> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 01:27:12 +0300 In-Reply-To: <000001c71e35$d826cd30$37244d51@brianlevie> (Brian Levie's message of "Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:38:19 -0000") Message-ID: <36328543@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Failure to compile X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:02:19 -0000 Hello Brian and welcome! On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:38:19 -0000 Brian Levie wrote: > I recently installed FreeBSD 6.1, How did you do it? > and copied many Unix files with no What do you call "Unix files" and where did you get them? > problems at all. However when I try to run the C compiler which worked fine > with Unix, I get the error message '/usr/bin/cc Exec format error Binary > file not executable'. I tried changing permissions and owner with no change. Please, show us the output of commands "uname -a", "file /usr/bin/cc" and "ls -l /usr/bin/cc". > Any suggestions or won't the unix C compiler not work with FreeBSD? Well, FreeBSD is used to be compiled by this compiler. Those troubles of yours shouldn't happen. ;-) WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 23:03:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A81F16A518 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:03:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tradigan@newrevolutions.net) Received: from newrevolutions.net (h-66-166-153-85.phlapafg.covad.net [66.166.153.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC3F4464D for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:28:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tradigan@newrevolutions.net) Received: (qmail 68135 invoked by uid 98); 12 Dec 2006 22:34:11 -0000 Received: from 66.166.153.82 by ns1.newrevolutions.net (envelope-from , uid 89) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.88.4/1946. spamassassin: 3.1.5. Clear:RC:0(66.166.153.82):SA:0(-2.0/5.0):. Processed in 6.722544 secs); 12 Dec 2006 22:34:11 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: tradigan@newrevolutions.net via ns1.newrevolutions.net X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:0(66.166.153.82):SA:0(-2.0/5.0):. Processed in 6.722544 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO l03ptradigan) (tradigan@newrevolutions.net@66.166.153.82) by newrevolutions.net with SMTP; 12 Dec 2006 22:34:04 -0000 From: "Timothy Radigan" To: Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:29:42 -0500 Organization: New Revolutions Message-ID: <000001c71e3d$0513a3c0$c30aa8c0@pmc.dhs.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Thread-Index: AccePQStBL0ldnvvS8ifsHAzpWiQ/g== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Kerberos Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:03:09 -0000 I am having trouble getting Samba 3 to compile with ADS support and I have narrowed the problem down to Kerberos. I have been told previously to NOT install the security/krb5 port when installing Samba 3 with ADS support, but I had already done that. After removing the security/krb5 port, it leaves no trace of Kerberos on the system, not even the base version of Kerberos that comes when FreeBSD is installed. My question, is there a way to rebuild the version that comes with FreeBSD and install it? Would a make buildworld and a make installworld solve my woes? Any help would be appreciated. Tim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 23:04:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD9916A675 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:04:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from drone2.qsi.net.nz (drone2-svc-skyt.qsi.net.nz [202.89.128.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC1F44E16 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:32:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: (qmail 32221 invoked by uid 0); 12 Dec 2006 22:34:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chen.org.nz) ([202.89.146.5]) (envelope-sender ) by 0 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 12 Dec 2006 22:34:19 -0000 Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7081356423; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:34:18 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:34:18 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen To: Brian Levie Message-ID: <20061212223418.GA49574@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <000001c71e35$d826cd30$37244d51@brianlevie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000001c71e35$d826cd30$37244d51@brianlevie> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Failure to compile X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:04:53 -0000 On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 09:38:19PM -0000, Brian Levie wrote: > I recently installed FreeBSD 6.1, and copied many Unix files with no > problems at all. However when I try to run the C compiler which worked fine > with Unix, I get the error message '/usr/bin/cc Exec format error Binary > file not executable'. I tried changing permissions and owner with no change. > Any suggestions or won't the unix C compiler not work with FreeBSD? What Unix are you talking about? Generally speaking, executables from a non-FreeBSD system will not work on FreeBSD. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- char *p="char *p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);} From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 23:04:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54EA16A6C4 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:04:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC3344E34 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:33:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBCMYZm3025989 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:34:35 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.5.99] (nilakantha.cs.washington.edu [128.208.5.99]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBCMYZBF016022 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:34:35 -0800 Message-ID: <457F2E7B.4010108@u.washington.edu> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:34:35 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <457F17BA.6060807@u.washington.edu> <8C2F27BD-EE20-451B-9E9D-D0259AED53BD@gmail.com> <457F2081.2090800@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2006.12.12.141932 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: dbus_enable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:04:55 -0000 eoghan wrote: > On 12 Dec 2006, at 21:34, Garrett Cooper wrote: > >> eoghan wrote: >>> On 12 Dec 2006, at 20:57, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>> >>>> eoghan wrote: >>>>> Hi >>>>> Im seeing some dbus_enable warnings when booting... saying its not >>>>> set properly in rc.conf >>>>> I dont see these warnings in dmesg though. I assume its coming >>>>> from my option: >>>>> gnome_enable="YES" >>>>> >>>>> here is the full contents of my /etc/rc.conf >>>>> >>>>> # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Wed Jul 19 20:56:08 2006 >>>>> # Created: Wed Jul 19 20:56:08 2006 >>>>> # Enable network daemons for user convenience. >>>>> # Please make all changes to this file, not to /etc/defaults/rc.conf. >>>>> # This file now contains just the overrides from >>>>> /etc/defaults/rc.conf. >>>>> hostname="nathaniel" >>>>> ifconfig_rl0="DHCP" >>>>> ipv6_enable="YES" >>>>> keymap="us.iso" >>>>> moused_enable="YES" >>>>> sshd_enable="YES" >>>>> usbd_enable="YES" >>>>> mysql_enable="YES" >>>>> webmin_enable="YES" >>>>> gdm_enable="YES" >>>>> ntpd_enable="YES" >>>>> gnome_enable="YES" >>>>> >>>>> Should I have gdm_enable and gnome_enable, or one or the other... >>>>> could that be causing the dbus_enable problem? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Eoghan >>>> Could you provide the errors you receive in a reply email please? >>>> Thanks, >>>> -Garrett >>> >>> Hi Garrett >>> They appear at the very end of booting, just before I get the gnome >>> login... >>> I got this from the system log: >>> Dec 12 19:44:03 nathaniel root: /etc/rc: WARNING: $dbus_enable is >>> not set properly - see rc.conf(5). >>> Dec 12 19:44:03 nathaniel root: /etc/rc: WARNING: $dbus_enable is >>> not set properly - see rc.conf(5). >>> Dec 12 19:44:03 nathaniel root: /etc/rc: WARNING: $polkitd_enable is >>> not set properly - see rc.conf(5). >>> Thanks >>> Eoghan >> Eoghan, >> Interesting. I thought there was a default for dbus_enable in >> /etc/defaults/rc.conf. Try putting in dbus_enable=yes in >> /etc/rc.conf; it's useful for automatically detecting hardware in >> gnome and interprocess communication in many different programs. Not >> sure what you want to do about polkitd_enable though.. It looks like >> you might need to enable that for dbus (based on this mailing-list >> thread and the references to dbus in the C source code): >> . >> >> -Garrett > > Hi Garrett > Thanks, will try that. I believe that the gnome_enable starts all > these processes, though I could be wrong... and I didnt get these > messages till I added gnome_enable. > Eoghan Eoghan, That makes sense. Many things in Gnome require dbus AFAIK, which would probably introduce dbus and other dependencies that would need to be set in /etc/rc.conf. Feel free to just CC the list as I am subscribed to it and don't need additional email :). -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 23:07:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AAC316A4B3 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:07:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (ns.umpquanet.com [63.105.30.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D510A44FDF for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:37:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBCMct1I029954; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:38:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: (from james@localhost) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id kBCMctWa029953; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:38:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:38:55 -0800 From: James Long To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, arun@dasmax.com Message-ID: <20061212223854.GA26718@ns.umpquanet.com> References: <20061212214525.2C68D16A5A2@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061212214525.2C68D16A5A2@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: Subject: RE: FreeBSD Backup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:07:55 -0000 > Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:05:18 -0800 (PST) > From: probsd org > Subject: RE: FreeBSD Backup > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <20061212150519.65264.qmail@web52409.mail.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > This is assuming you have another account on another freebsd/linux box with a significant amount of space. Works great on a live filesystem. I use /, /var, /tmp, and /usr as examples. > > dump -L -0f - /usr | ssh -C login@other-freebsd-server "cat > /usr/home/login/usr.dump" > dump -L -0f - /tmp | ssh -C login@other-freebsd-server "cat > /usr/home/login/tmp.dump" > dump -L -0f - /var | ssh -C login@other-freebsd-server "cat > /usr/home/login/var.dump" > dump -L -0f - / | ssh -C login@other-freebsd-server "cat > /usr/home/login/root.dump" Watch your umask when doing stuff like the above. If /usr/home/login is world-readable (or group-readable), and your umask permits world-readable files, then all your secure chown root / chmod 600 files are suddenly world readable to any rogueuser that can "cp /usr/home/login/root.dump ~rogueuser/". I prefer to explicitly set the umask: dump -L -0f - / | ssh -i ~root/.ssh/special_backup_dsa_key \ login@other-freebsd-server "umask 177; cat > /usr/home/login/root.dump" One could/should of course also "chmod 700 /usr/home/login" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 23:41:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9969416A4C2 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:41:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmc20@xxiii.com) Received: from imf01aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf01aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.49]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E8B444F8 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:32:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmc20@xxiii.com) Received: from ibm65aec.bellsouth.net ([68.209.177.221]) by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20061212205249.XSXI13460.imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm65aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:52:49 -0500 Received: from wcox.bellsouth.net ([68.209.177.221]) by ibm65aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20061212205245.KHPP24660.ibm65aec.bellsouth.net@wcox.bellsouth.net> for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:52:45 -0500 Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20061212153306.0321bc30@mailsvr.xxiii.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:52:45 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: wc_fbsd@xxiii.com In-Reply-To: <20061211175301.17B7.GERARD@seibercom.net> References: <20061211185718.E5F0616A56A@hub.freebsd.org> <20061211220901.GB69273@ns.umpquanet.com> <20061211175301.17B7.GERARD@seibercom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: List Protocol (was: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:41:12 -0000 At 05:59 PM 12/11/2006, Gerard Seibert wrote: >Besides, how hard is it to subscribe to a list, post your question >and hopefully receive a satisfactory response and then terminate >your association with the list if you are so inclined. Wasn't going to say anything, but... I agree totally that you should have to be subscribed to post. This isn't "AOL 101" -- some pittance of technical competence is a prereq'. "Try Googling before posting" is a repeated several times daily; why not make 'em subscribe first? Might cut down on some of that, as well as the spam & scam emails. I can't recall any other mailing lists I've been on in the last 10 years that allow non-subscribed posts. And from a more personal view, the "no subscription required" has bitten me at least once -- I always use alias addresses for publicly archived lists, since they will inevitably be scrapped up by the spammers and abused. I forgot to select the correct "From" on a post a few weeks ago; now a "real" address is chiseled in granite on the web archive, and I'll probably have to abandon it soon. Would have much rather had it bounced back at me. -Wayne From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 00:28:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BBE816A40F for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:28:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6801143CA7 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:26:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so499nzh for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:28:10 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=PIIlkVJgZtLKo0vj5fhHoB90T8zAO7Uka8n9mevg68DOU3FiB+nHROLobKAEZMin0XkVQstJhERuNNpCRgTqXp4sk8kl639dQ0rk2d8oZrdc2Hp2pd9sfSodPuqqtX0E3X4UYb29EWKtGeCQT0WG5inLardkN94cbFWXnHZYjpw= Received: by 10.65.194.13 with SMTP id w13mr330318qbp.1165969690182; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:28:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.75.14 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:28:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <17489c7a0612121628m38b404cbm439bd38afe407736@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:28:10 -0500 From: "Chad Gross" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <000001c71e3d$0513a3c0$c30aa8c0@pmc.dhs.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <000001c71e3d$0513a3c0$c30aa8c0@pmc.dhs.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Kerberos Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:28:11 -0000 On 12/12/06, Timothy Radigan wrote: > > I am having trouble getting Samba 3 to compile with ADS support and I have > narrowed the problem down to Kerberos. I have been told previously to NOT > install the security/krb5 port when installing Samba 3 with ADS support, > but > I had already done that. After removing the security/krb5 port, it leaves > no trace of Kerberos on the system, not even the base version of Kerberos > that comes when FreeBSD is installed. > > > > My question, is there a way to rebuild the version that comes with FreeBSD > and install it? Would a make buildworld and a make installworld solve my > woes? > > > > Any help would be appreciated. > > > > Tim Try looking in /usr/src/kerberos5 Chad From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 00:53:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D5516A525 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:53:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E8DE43E32 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:49:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from coolf89ea26645 (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id kBD0oXx41545; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:50:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Message-ID: <000801c71e50$93fc9750$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , References: <20061211185718.E5F0616A56A@hub.freebsd.org><20061211220901.GB69273@ns.umpquanet.com><20061211175301.17B7.GERARD@seibercom.net> <6.2.3.4.2.20061212153306.0321bc30@mailsvr.xxiii.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:49:39 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Cc: Subject: Re: List Protocol (was: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:53:30 -0000 The reason that questions doesen't require a subscription ought to be obvious to anyone with any experience with FreeBSD. questions@freebsd.org is used as the default contact e-mail address for most non-financial FreeBSD dealings, such as on CD cases, marketing materials, etc. Why? Because for most newbies they think they are dealing with a cohesive organization with a young girl in a tank top and boobs out front answering the damn phone. They DON'T think they are dealing with a bunch of hayseeds sitting on their computers wanking at each other. When your ready to field all of those questions from misguided newbies, mistaken newspaper article writers, company wanks told by their superiors to investigate this "freeBSd thing" then we can make questions an opt-in list. Until then STFU you ungrateful bastards. All you once were dumb newbies who didn't know FreeBSD from free beer, and I'll bet more than a few of you sent e-mail to questions, thinking it was an actual person who gave a damn. Boy were you surprised! Ted ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 12:52 PM Subject: List Protocol (was: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x) > At 05:59 PM 12/11/2006, Gerard Seibert wrote: > >Besides, how hard is it to subscribe to a list, post your question > >and hopefully receive a satisfactory response and then terminate > >your association with the list if you are so inclined. > > Wasn't going to say anything, but... > > I agree totally that you should have to be subscribed to post. This > isn't "AOL 101" -- some pittance of technical competence is a > prereq'. "Try Googling before posting" is a repeated several times > daily; why not make 'em subscribe first? Might cut down on some of > that, as well as the spam & scam emails. I can't recall any other > mailing lists I've been on in the last 10 years that allow > non-subscribed posts. > > And from a more personal view, the "no subscription required" has > bitten me at least once -- I always use alias addresses for publicly > archived lists, since they will inevitably be scrapped up by the > spammers and abused. I forgot to select the correct "From" on a post > a few weeks ago; now a "real" address is chiseled in granite on the > web archive, and I'll probably have to abandon it soon. Would have > much rather had it bounced back at me. > > -Wayne > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 01:36:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC88616A415 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 01:36:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rjhjr@cox.net) Received: from centrmmtao06.cox.net (centrmmtao06.cox.net [70.168.83.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573CD43CCA for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 01:34:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rjhjr@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by centrmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20061213013614.PWPA19088.centrmmtao06.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:36:14 -0500 Received: from localhost ([68.230.186.138]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id y1bC1V01F2zbV0s0000000; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:35:13 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:36:14 -0500 From: Bob Hall To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061213013613.GA36059@kongemord.krig.net> Mail-Followup-To: Bob Hall , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <6.2.3.4.2.20061212153306.0321bc30@mailsvr.xxiii.com> <000801c71e50$93fc9750$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000801c71e50$93fc9750$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: List Protocol (was: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 01:36:16 -0000 On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 04:49:39PM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > a young girl in a tank top and boobs out front Isn't that where the boobs are usually installed? > Until then STFU you ungrateful bastards. All you once were > dumb newbies who didn't know FreeBSD from free beer, and > I'll bet more than a few of you sent e-mail to questions, thinking > it was an actual person who gave a damn. Boy were you surprised! That's exactly what happened to me, back in the time of FBSD 4.3. And I got a response from an actual knowledgeable person who gave a damn. The only thing better would have been a young girl in a tank top and boobs out front. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 02:01:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E7116A412 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 02:01:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from ext-gw.lemis.com (ext-gw.lemis.com [150.101.14.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7443943CB4 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 02:00:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by ext-gw.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB69D13351A; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:31:39 +1030 (CST) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id BDE6E9C2BC; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:31:39 +1030 (CST) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:31:39 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Ted Mittelstaedt Message-ID: <20061213020139.GD34082@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <6.2.3.4.2.20061212153306.0321bc30@mailsvr.xxiii.com> <000801c71e50$93fc9750$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qTzJm9l2qECmSDiM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000801c71e50$93fc9750$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 VoIP: sip:0871270137@sip.internode.on.net WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Cc: wc_fbsd@xxiii.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: List Protocol (was: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 02:01:42 -0000 --qTzJm9l2qECmSDiM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday, 12 December 2006 at 16:49:39 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > Until then STFU you ungrateful bastards. All you once were dumb > newbies who didn't know FreeBSD from free beer, and I'll bet more > than a few of you sent e-mail to questions, thinking it was an > actual person who gave a damn. Boy were you surprised! Ted, there are other aspects of the list protocol. One has to do with message format. You seem to have great difficulty with this one, requiring other people to manually reformat, and often to guess what you're talking about. Another has to do with politeness. You seem to abuse this one again and again; it's one of the reasons why I seldom read this mailing list any more. You've probably driven off a number of people who would be able to give *helpful* answers. Please stop. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --qTzJm9l2qECmSDiM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFf18DIubykFB6QiMRAu0oAJ91yiI0kJ7goDzVCpH8xbVAravuigCggLM3 zd7etqS4Qv5ajvJ4fVtDPhw= =BDD8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qTzJm9l2qECmSDiM-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 03:59:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7866916A407 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 03:59:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B08843CA0 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 03:57:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBD3x4I4018891 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:59:04 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBD3x4ov025165 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:59:04 -0800 Message-ID: <457F7A87.9010000@u.washington.edu> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:59:03 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <6.2.3.4.2.20061212153306.0321bc30@mailsvr.xxiii.com> <000801c71e50$93fc9750$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> <20061213020139.GD34082@wantadilla.lemis.com> <457F77E8.30703@u.washington.edu> <20061213035621.GH34082@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <20061213035621.GH34082@wantadilla.lemis.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2006.12.12.194432 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='LEO_OBFU_SUBJ_RE 0.1, __CP_NAME_BODY 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: List Protocol X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 03:59:05 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Tuesday, 12 December 2006 at 19:47:52 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >>> On Tuesday, 12 December 2006 at 16:49:39 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >>>> Until then STFU you ungrateful bastards. All you once were dumb >>>> newbies who didn't know FreeBSD from free beer, and I'll bet more >>>> than a few of you sent e-mail to questions, thinking it was an >>>> actual person who gave a damn. Boy were you surprised! >>> Ted, there are other aspects of the list protocol. One has to do with >>> message format. You seem to have great difficulty with this one, >>> requiring other people to manually reformat, and often to guess what >>> you're talking about. >>> >>> Another has to do with politeness. You seem to abuse this one again >>> and again; it's one of the reasons why I seldom read this mailing list >>> any more. You've probably driven off a number of people who would be >>> able to give *helpful* answers. Please stop. >>> >>> Greg >> Wayne, et. all, >> There's an obvious reason why the mailing list is open to all, >> so instead of conjecturing on why it's the way it is, we should just >> accept the way it is and leave things like that? > > You sent this only to me, at least according to the headers. Did > Wayne get it? > >> Greg, >> I do empathize with what you said in the past, in regard to what >> I wrote. I've come across many cases in the past where I couldn't solve >> what I needed to get solved by using Google, so I've turned to >> knowledgeable people on the list to help solve my problems, >> respectfully, cause I know that my knowledge or time was limited. >> I just was trying to emphasize the fact that I wanted to teach >> others how to fish, instead of just providing them with the fish, so as >> to speak, as the proverb goes. That way they would strengthen their >> knowledge, as well as benefit the community with their experience. Many >> times people have asked similar questions, which can be solved more >> quickly by doing a little bit of research on their topic of question. >> I'm not trying to say that my way is right and that it should >> always be done. It's just a means to discovering the truth or solving a >> problem, one of the frustrating and challenging things about life. To >> each and her's their own, but I'm just trying to provide a solution that >> works for me in the hope that the reader will be able to solve their >> problem :). > > I don't have a problem with what you have written (or at least, I > can't recall any such problem :-). I was talking to Ted, who can be > quite obnoxious at times. > > FWIW, I tend to agree with what you say, though that doesn't mean I > won't disagree on a detail at a later date. > > Greg > -- > Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key. > See complete headers for address and phone numbers. Understood. I hate it when I reply to the wrong person =\.. Sorry for the extra email and take care! - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFf3qHEnKyINQw/HARAkqgAJ0WoEzC8JIGhWODYLxikLy64bonQQCgjW/u 79gjW00GzJ5InJZLSpPVM3c= =q80r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 04:01:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045AE16A403; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:01:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0486E43CA3; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:00:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647DB1A3C1C; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:01:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 138B75133A; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:01:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:01:51 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey Message-ID: <20061213040151.GA25879@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <6.2.3.4.2.20061212153306.0321bc30@mailsvr.xxiii.com> <000801c71e50$93fc9750$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> <20061213020139.GD34082@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="17pEHd4RhPHOinZp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061213020139.GD34082@wantadilla.lemis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: wc_fbsd@xxiii.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Ted Mittelstaedt Subject: Re: List Protocol (was: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:01:55 -0000 --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 12:31:39PM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Tuesday, 12 December 2006 at 16:49:39 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > > > Until then STFU you ungrateful bastards. All you once were dumb > > newbies who didn't know FreeBSD from free beer, and I'll bet more > > than a few of you sent e-mail to questions, thinking it was an > > actual person who gave a damn. Boy were you surprised! >=20 > Ted, there are other aspects of the list protocol. One has to do with > message format. You seem to have great difficulty with this one, > requiring other people to manually reformat, and often to guess what > you're talking about. >=20 > Another has to do with politeness. You seem to abuse this one again > and again; it's one of the reasons why I seldom read this mailing list > any more. You've probably driven off a number of people who would be > able to give *helpful* answers. Please stop. Yeah, I've been procmailing him to /dev/null for a couple of years now. Kris --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQFFf3svWry0BWjoQKURAm1VAJiHAvGJmUjQMwxnABmImY9gT1WeAKDqegiq K9stMEcqJavfjhGev7fxuA== =M+ZF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 04:06:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B3216A403 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:06:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3159943C9F for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:05:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GuLO8-0000ME-Su for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:06:37 -0500 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost.localnet.local [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kBD49EOp003471 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:09:14 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id kBD49Dw6003470 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:09:13 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:09:13 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <6.2.3.4.2.20061212153306.0321bc30@mailsvr.xxiii.com> <000801c71e50$93fc9750$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> <20061213020139.GD34082@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <20061213020139.GD34082@wantadilla.lemis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612122209.13867.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79e00f78f87d214364f6b128eaf0efba49350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Re: List Protocol (was: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:06:38 -0000 On Tuesday 12 December 2006 20:01, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Tuesday, 12 December 2006 at 16:49:39 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > Until then STFU you ungrateful bastards. All you once were dumb > > newbies who didn't know FreeBSD from free beer, and I'll bet more > > than a few of you sent e-mail to questions, thinking it was an > > actual person who gave a damn. Boy were you surprised! > > Ted, there are other aspects of the list protocol. One has to do with > message format. You seem to have great difficulty with this one, > requiring other people to manually reformat, and often to guess what > you're talking about. > > Another has to do with politeness. You seem to abuse this one again > and again; it's one of the reasons why I seldom read this mailing list > any more. You've probably driven off a number of people who would be > able to give *helpful* answers. Please stop. > > Greg > -- > When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. > If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. > For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html > See complete headers for address and phone numbers. Not that Ted needs any defense, but ... He's also made a few of us pay attention and pitch in. God love him! Now where is the girl in the tank top? lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 04:10:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53AE516A40F for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmc20@xxiii.com) Received: from imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2097443C9F for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:08:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmc20@xxiii.com) Received: from ibm69aec.bellsouth.net ([68.209.177.221]) by imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20061213041001.EXPL15322.imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm69aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:10:01 -0500 Received: from wcox.bellsouth.net ([68.209.177.221]) by ibm69aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20061213041001.TFHW14915.ibm69aec.bellsouth.net@wcox.bellsouth.net>; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:10:01 -0500 Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20061212230551.0319fb30@mailsvr.xxiii.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:10:04 -0500 To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" , From: wc_fbsd@xxiii.com In-Reply-To: <000801c71e50$93fc9750$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> References: <20061211185718.E5F0616A56A@hub.freebsd.org> <20061211220901.GB69273@ns.umpquanet.com> <20061211175301.17B7.GERARD@seibercom.net> <6.2.3.4.2.20061212153306.0321bc30@mailsvr.xxiii.com> <000801c71e50$93fc9750$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: List Protocol (was: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:10:03 -0000 At 07:49 PM 12/12/2006, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >The reason that questions doesen't require a subscription ought to >be obvious to anyone with any experience with FreeBSD. >questions@freebsd.org is used as the default contact e-mail address >for most non-financial FreeBSD dealings, such as on CD cases, NOPE. Disagree Completely. You are way out of touch. Those people don't comprehend a "mailing list". They do "web pages" and "web forums" and other clumsy devices. Put it on www.freebsd.org if you want it easily accessible to such people. >They DON'T think they are dealing with a bunch of hayseeds sitting >on their computers wanking at each other. I have some gripe with the list and its membership, but have never accused it of being a circle-jerk. >Until then STFU you ungrateful bastards. All you once were dumb newbies Shut Up. Those guys are in the windoze or linux 'fest. -WC From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 04:29:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43BDA16A403 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:29:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from business.oriented@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2645D43CA0 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:27:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from business.oriented@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so54762wxc for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:29:16 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=WTGjbrJeVLORRMY0zlGFD8EERlcOmI4UA9AJSB6Y7xwGeZH3nJQfvXCmc0ShmrSVi9jocv+HTP4uqUpuxV9tfAJPCaOILewHEU96hvHrb7OF2x1OMs/B3CLnErlOKwbCtyH65csO5d2g7bnZIC1DjDmPhDCpmoW5AHQ2+GsekeA= Received: by 10.90.90.16 with SMTP id n16mr181143agb.1165984156846; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:29:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from bloodlust ( [69.60.116.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 7sm250316agd.2006.12.12.20.29.13; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:29:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <001f01c71e6f$29a1ef30$93d3dcc9@bloodlust> From: "Ne'Bahn" To: "UNIX - questions" Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:27:58 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: Resolution on GNOME... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:29:18 -0000 FreeBSD 6.1 I can't change resolutions under GNOME, anyone can help me, I've modified xorg.conf almost a million of times but nothing else... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 04:46:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7B916A407 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:46:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ericsbinaryworld@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0246A43CA8 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:44:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ericsbinaryworld@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so57686wxc for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:46:16 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=I6oAu4P43LH9AD8QU66HwL7RoZ+iZ43yNplhaaKwu/mmFHciTMKkaZLTZK5zsT1rLcXKP+UPWDokSfFSDwa4J0w1JB18jm4ovTUX3noMaqVc5ew6BIzbyitBOljURvunD9wBNEE1W5tVIoI+LuFqo/oJAGRda/UBffuDyxjeIa0= Received: by 10.90.71.12 with SMTP id t12mr211712aga.1165985175839; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:46:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.103? ( [68.48.94.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 21sm260021agd.2006.12.12.20.46.15; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:46:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <457F8596.5000207@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:46:14 -0500 From: Eric Mesa User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ne'Bahn References: <001f01c71e6f$29a1ef30$93d3dcc9@bloodlust> In-Reply-To: <001f01c71e6f$29a1ef30$93d3dcc9@bloodlust> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: UNIX - questions Subject: Re: Resolution on GNOME... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:46:24 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ne'Bahn wrote: > FreeBSD 6.1 > > I can't change resolutions under GNOME, anyone can help me, I've > modified xorg.conf almost a million of times but nothing else... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To > unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > When you modified it, did you restart X? - -- Eric Mesa ericsbinaryworld@gmail.com http://www.ericsbinaryworld.com Note: All emails from this address should have a GPG signature. If you have the proper setup you can use this to confirm my identity and that the email was not changed in transit. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFf4WVPvU+8ApmWXIRAvgnAJ0S/O2MLrEs2W+ekd+QBDUllFY56wCg6fL0 lvc/58Ot76cVGPYEFlS+vlE= =hn65 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 05:05:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1641216A407 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 05:05:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7073743CA0 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 05:03:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBD55594001785 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:05:05 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBD555i1008322 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:05:05 -0800 Message-ID: <457F8A00.6050900@u.washington.edu> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:05:04 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <001f01c71e6f$29a1ef30$93d3dcc9@bloodlust> <457F8596.5000207@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <457F8596.5000207@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2006.12.12.204932 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: Resolution on GNOME... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 05:05:07 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Eric Mesa wrote: > Ne'Bahn wrote: >> FreeBSD 6.1 > >> I can't change resolutions under GNOME, anyone can help me, I've >> modified xorg.conf almost a million of times but nothing else... >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To >> unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > When you modified it, did you restart X? > Have you tried a process similar to this: ? - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFf4oAEnKyINQw/HARAlLvAKCGFa4nXsIaVdZQv6gIYuGeXvjhSwCfXhf9 x9+d/Ga8wPlQNMOom4tukk0= =Ixzu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 07:22:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91BB816A417 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 07:22:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C66843CB3 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 07:21:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so83872wxc for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:22:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YcGs9t3+jwg9JPv/k47yI2oi4D47a3ke7tkcj88jh+V3d79EC3ygkzMQcNDwcbcEDAHk4rSLR0p/IqpPQTeWd62M+6ZtK5rKgoCx71tuxF+C8OuUC4sQ6gmn6bmXaCh9tPqJRMdDX0yNnq12cabyTaLDk/EwDVSlafONA06n9T4= Received: by 10.70.56.4 with SMTP id e4mr1008157wxa.1165994572962; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:22:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.14.20 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:22:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <14989d6e0612122322o5c662419x5fb93d26cf710370@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:22:52 +0100 From: "Christian Walther" To: Ne'Bahn In-Reply-To: <001f01c71e6f$29a1ef30$93d3dcc9@bloodlust> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <001f01c71e6f$29a1ef30$93d3dcc9@bloodlust> Cc: UNIX - questions Subject: Re: Resolution on GNOME... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 07:22:54 -0000 You can try the xrandr command using a terminal. $ xrandr -q gives a list of all supported resolution, while you can use $ xrandr -s SZ to set a specific resolution. SZ is the first column of the "xrandr -q" output. For everything else do a "man xrandr". From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 07:42:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E45C16A5B4 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 07:42:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meilinxiaoxue@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.244]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1E643DAA for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 07:40:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from meilinxiaoxue@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so10324ana for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:41:42 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:x-mailer:reply-to:x-priority:message-id:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=YkDTBH+VEEaTNyhqDLnXD8D4MiUIyhRZ6lkRwGYzXotZ0l+db1oRfln+kQaaGyA01ePawLfQd4vz2lNKH9PLO6mKQZhrpCcveksKVxE0jjpki+XTNmqDf0GnbAe8NZuDNrZFbXgI9arKlr0d0vhUxcB/VEa//IJ6IlaRLCrcOA0= Received: by 10.100.190.8 with SMTP id n8mr289254anf.1165995702449; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:41:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?122.198.15.154? ( [122.198.15.154]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b18sm611666ana.2006.12.12.23.41.39; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:41:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:41:30 +0800 From: meilin X-Mailer: SecureBat! Lite (v2.10.02) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1461586273.20061213154130@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: where is the full compile option for sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: meilin List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 07:42:46 -0000 hi all: The original sendmail's compile option is configured by m4,the one distribute with FreeBSD has tripped out some files and can not configure as the usual way,I have man make.conf,however, just find several items for sendmail and a few instructions. I want to know how to fully control the compile option while just do not install sendmail from a original source package? thx very much -- meilin mailto:meilinxiaoxue@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 08:28:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92F116A4A0 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:28:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) Received: from mail-in05.adhost.com (mail-da01.adhost.com [216.211.128.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93B743CAA for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:26:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) Received: from ad-exh01.adhost.lan (unknown [216.211.143.69]) by mail-in05.adhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42AA1164887; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:27:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:27:22 -0800 Message-ID: <17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D5203160167353D@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> In-Reply-To: <20061211171506.97949c7e.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: shmmax tops out at 2G? Thread-Index: AccddXjzPelOrnywTf2YER/CRIiZhgBGrFkg From: "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" To: "Bill Moran" , Cc: Subject: RE: shmmax tops out at 2G? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:28:10 -0000 Hello Bill: -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Bill Moran Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 2:15 PM To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: shmmax tops out at 2G? uname -a FreeBSD db00.lab00 6.2-BETA3 FreeBSD 6.2-BETA3 #1: Fri Dec 8 09:27:37 EST 2006 root@db00.lab00:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DB-2850-amd64 amd64 sysctl kern.ipc.shmmax=3D2200000000 kern.ipc.shmmax: 2100000000 -> -2094967296 Looks like an unsigned 32-bit int. That doesn't seem to scale as well as would be expected on 64-bit arch. Is this a mistake, or intentional? I'm working with some big memory systems, and I sure would like to allocate more than 2G for PostgreSQL to use ... --=20 Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. --- This may be a silly question but, have you compiled a PAE-enabled kernel? If not, check out /sys/i386/conf/PAE. Regards, Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 08:34:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB5716A403 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:34:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) Received: from mail-in05.adhost.com (mailnat.adhost.com [216.211.128.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1737643CCD for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:32:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) Received: from ad-exh01.adhost.lan (unknown [216.211.143.69]) by mail-in05.adhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85576164830 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:34:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:34:09 -0800 Message-ID: <17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D5203160167353E@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> In-Reply-To: <457D027A.102@sumail.ru> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: What can I use to study Ethernet frames? Thread-Index: Accc8r0UBbpZWLbHSy6G62BF1atdjgBnqL+w From: "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" To: Subject: RE: What can I use to study Ethernet frames? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:34:29 -0000 Hello: -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of g Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 11:02 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What can I use to study Ethernet frames? a@zeos.net wrote: > Which program can I use to study Ethernet frames? > > Elisej Babenko > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > =20 Try wireshark it is in the ports, it used to be ethereal Cheers --- TCP Dump is also good for this sort of thing. Mike _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 08:39:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B0AB16A4A0 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:39:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from achilles.leela.ws (achilles.leela.ws [66.207.162.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA9143CED for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:38:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.0.199] (odysseus.leela.ws [209.193.28.35]) (authenticated bits=0) by achilles.leela.ws (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBD8d4jM037464 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:39:19 -0900 (AKST) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:39:12 -0900 From: "Peter A. Giessel" To: Frank Bonnet X-Priority: 3 In-Reply-To: <45795EB1.3050604@esiee.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Mailsmith 2.1.5 (Blindsider) X-Face: "_wft\KfdX>/bdT3lwF/u#Qt[0GrO}8`9z%Ea; +=@Yi|(62HPgs\=cf'X)$GR=d+{y}^&ou SAA>]B{|*=nN; W{0Y& Subject: Re: Which version to use ( Xeon 64 bits ) egg and chicken problem ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:39:54 -0000 On Friday, 2006, December 8 at 3:46, f.bonnet@esiee.fr (Frank Bonnet) wrote= : >Frank Bonnet wrote: >> Frank Bonnet wrote: >>> Vince wrote: >>>> Vince wrote: >>> >>>>> >>>> Sorry lacking coffeee this morning I mean of course >>>> >>>> /pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/6.2 >>>> >>>> /me goes back to sleep now. >>>> Vince >>> Vince, >>> >>> OK i'm going to have a try with it >>> I'll let you know how it worked. >>> >>> >>=20 >> Well :-( it does not work it seems the Adaptec patch for serverRAID 8k >> is not present in 6.2-RC1 as sysinstall does not find any disk >>=20 > >this is an egg and chicken problem ! > >How to rebuild a new patched amd64 ISO as I only have *this* 64 bits machi= ne >and cannot acces to hard disks ? > I had a similar problem with my 3ware card when I first installed 6.0. The 3ware card was brand new and not yet in the base system, but a driver was posted on their site. How I solved the problem is that I installed another card that was supported in the base system, another hard drive that worked with the card (UltraDMA 133 card/hard drive IIRC). After installing on that hard drive, and patching to support my raid card, I booted off the patched drive and the raid array was then recognized. I used dump/restore to move the patched system from the IDE hard drive to the raid array, then could boot off the raid array as desired and could remove the extra card/hard drive. HTH. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 08:45:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5397616A40F for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:45:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C7E43CB9 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:43:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BF61A3C1C; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:45:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1BA075133A; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 03:45:07 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 03:45:06 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" Message-ID: <20061213084506.GA29889@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20061211171506.97949c7e.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D5203160167353D@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D5203160167353D@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Bill Moran Subject: Re: shmmax tops out at 2G? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:45:54 -0000 --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 12:27:22AM -0800, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote: > Hello Bill: >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Bill Moran > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 2:15 PM > To: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: shmmax tops out at 2G? >=20 >=20 > uname -a > FreeBSD db00.lab00 6.2-BETA3 FreeBSD 6.2-BETA3 #1: Fri Dec 8 09:27:37 > EST 2006 root@db00.lab00:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DB-2850-amd64 amd64 >=20 > sysctl kern.ipc.shmmax=3D2200000000 > kern.ipc.shmmax: 2100000000 -> -2094967296 >=20 > Looks like an unsigned 32-bit int. That doesn't seem to scale as well > as > would be expected on 64-bit arch. >=20 > Is this a mistake, or intentional? I'm working with some big memory > systems, and I sure would like to allocate more than 2G for PostgreSQL > to use ... >=20 > --=20 > Bill Moran > Collaborative Fusion Inc. >=20 > --- >=20 > This may be a silly question but, have you compiled a PAE-enabled > kernel? If not, check out /sys/i386/conf/PAE. Yeah, it is ;-) PAE is a hack for legacy i386 systems which cannot run in full 64-bit (amd64) mode - it's not relevant to this problem. Bill's guess is probably right, so someone needs to go over the sysv ipc code and make it 64-bit capable. Kris --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFf72SWry0BWjoQKURAlXpAJ0TxYAb3emCrIPflewTtWf5/yZVRACffuU3 oRm63lNk6b/+yBmiQQI//UM= =t9zA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 09:48:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 815B016A492 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:48:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from diri.bris.ac.uk (diri.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEE6C43CAA for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:46:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by diri.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GuQiU-0001Qa-Dd; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:48:12 +0000 Received: from mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.184.33]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GuQhf-00031U-8c; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:47:07 +0000 Received: from mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost.men.bris.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBD9j5Cb045708; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:45:05 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from shterenl@localhost) by mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.4/Submit) id kBD9j5fq045707; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:45:05 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk: shterenl set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:45:05 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Erik Norgaard Message-ID: <20061213094505.GA45652@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Erik Norgaard , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20061207142439.GA20896@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> <4579D1B2.1060202@locolomo.org> <20061212121526.GA40735@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> <457F1D38.60202@locolomo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <457F1D38.60202@locolomo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Spam-Score: -1.2 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: periodic passwd change? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:48:13 -0000 On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 10:20:56PM +0100, Erik Norgaard wrote: > Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 09:57:22PM +0100, Erik Norgaard wrote: > >>Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >>> I can't see how to prescribe periodic passwd change, > >>>only how to set expiry time. At the moment I put the following > >>>line in the root's crontab: > >>> > >>>2 2 2 * * pw usermod shterenl -p "`date '+\%d-\%m-\%Y'`" > >>> > >>>This makes a user's passwd expire once a month. > >>> > >>>Is there a better way to force users change their passwds periodically? > >>You can set it in login.conf, when the password is updated the next > >>expire is automatically set. > > > >I checked login.conf. It seems that passwordtime option has no effect. > >I did a brief search and found many postings describing the same problem: > >many options from login.conf have no effect. Perhaps these are the > >"RESERVED CAPABILITIES' as they are called in the man page. Some people > >list a patch that supposedly fixes the problem, but I'm not sure if it > >applies to 6.2-prerelease thatI'm running. > > > >thanks > >anton > did you remember to cap_mkdb after? from the man page: > > "Whenever changes to this, or the user's ~/.login_conf, file are made, > the modifications will not be picked up until cap_mkdb(1) is used to > compile the file into a database." > > Cheers, Erik yes, I did. Other options, e.g. passwd_prompt from Authentication category do work, but passwordtime has no effect. There are plenty of similar accounts I found on the net, e.g.: www.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD-Security/2003-02/0039.html "Many login.conf accounting and authentication options broken Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 05:40:48 -0800 From: David Schultz To: security@FreeBSD.ORG Most of the accounting options in login.conf(5) and many examples in /etc/login.conf don't seem to work. I can't even find any evidence of a mechanism to support them. (Perhaps an old-timer can tell me where one used to exist, if it used to exist.) ..." thanks anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 10:34:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C22116A47B for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:34:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 298A443CC7 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:32:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (localhost.esiee.fr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id D724F36595D; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:33:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from secure.esiee.fr (secure.esiee.fr [147.215.1.19]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8602365942; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:33:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from [147.215.1.21] (lisa.esiee.fr [147.215.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bonnetf) by secure.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049CA398CF; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:26:36 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <457FD710.5010704@esiee.fr> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:33:52 +0100 From: Frank Bonnet User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Does the ADAPTEC serverRAID 8k SAS will be supported at 6.2 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:34:13 -0000 Hello Following a post I did several days ago I wonder if the ADAPTEC SAS serverRAID 8k hardware will be integrated to 6.2-R ( i386 and amd64 ) ? Thanks a lot. -- Frank From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 11:17:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CEBF16A403 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:17:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oregnier@ixsys.org) Received: from 26.mail-out.ovh.net (26.mail-out.ovh.net [213.186.42.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C72B43CD8 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:16:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oregnier@ixsys.org) Received: (qmail 17638 invoked by uid 503); 13 Dec 2006 11:17:51 -0000 Received: (QMFILT: 1.0); 13 Dec 2006 11:17:51 -0000 Received: from b6.ovh.net (HELO mail155.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.56) by 26.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 13 Dec 2006 11:17:51 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue-out) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 13 Dec 2006 11:17:44 -0000 Received: from mac76-2-82-241-6-173.fbx.proxad.net (HELO ?192.168.1.2?) (82.241.6.173) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 13 Dec 2006 11:17:42 -0000 Message-ID: <457FE1D4.6050007@ixsys.org> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:19:48 +0100 From: Olivier Regnier User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Ovh-Remote: 82.241.6.173 (mac76-2-82-241-6-173.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|H 0.5/N Subject: mpg123 with shoutcast radio X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:17:52 -0000 Hello, mpg123 is a relatively simple program but doesn't work with .pls file. I used this command: % mpg123 -@ "http://www.shoutcast.com/sbin/shoutcast-playlist.pls?rn=5761&file=filename.pls" but i have this message: > HTTP request failed: 404 Not Found My pf firewall and proxy are disabled but anytime, i have the same thing. Estrange no ? Can you help me please ? -- Cheers, Olivier Regnier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 11:27:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2052316A415 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:27:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8ED43CD5 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:25:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [172.16.3.238] (gateway.ash.thebunker.net [213.129.64.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBDBQfnC053583 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:26:56 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk from=m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk; sender-id=permerror; spf=permerror X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk kBDBQfnC053583 Message-ID: <457FE36C.4050006@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:26:36 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061120) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lane References: <457CDE4B.2050103@summerhost.net> <457D063B.2040705@infracaninophile.co.uk> <200612110755.24757.lane@joeandlane.com> In-Reply-To: <200612110755.24757.lane@joeandlane.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig775603D038136B01D3E9A745" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]); Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:27:06 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/2320/Wed Dec 13 09:03:44 2006 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_POLICY_TESTING autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:27:55 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig775603D038136B01D3E9A745 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Lane wrote: > On Monday 11 December 2006 01:18, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> listvj wrote: >>> I'm interested in upgrading from 4.11 to 5.x. I currently track 4.x >>> stable using cvsup, but I've never done a major version upgrade. >>> >>> First, should I bother? My hardware has dual pentium 1.13 processors= >>> with 1G ram (I'm considering maxing it out at 4). I host email and w= eb >>> sites for a few domains on this machine and I have four jails configu= red >>> on it which will have to be upgraded too. I have users counting >>> particularly on mail service not being down for too long. >>> >>> Other than the obvious advice to start with a good backup, can anyone= >>> tell me: >>> >>> 1) Will I gain a major benefit from upgrading >>> 2) Where should I look for instructions / advice on upgrading >>> 3) Also any general advice from personal experience. >>> 4) Just how risky is this? >> Uh -- why upgrade to a branch (5.x) that has already had it's last >> release and is worse performing than both 4.x and 6.x? You should >> really be looking at upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE just as soon as it >> comes out (Real Soon Now). >> >> As for risk -- for various reasons you will be better off doing a >> clean install of 6.x and rebuilding your server from the ground up. >> It's no more risky than installing any other server -- unless you >> have some legacy binary-only application that you absolutely have >> to run, it is virtually certain to succeed. >> >> You biggest problem would seem to be the downtime required to do >> the update -- if you can manage it, probably the least consumer >> impact method is building the upgraded system on fresh disks on a >> scratch box, and then finishing the upgrade by a disk-swap. Which >> also has the added benefit that you have a ready-made back out >> path. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Matthew > Matthew, >=20 > I agree with your advice to build the new server with a clean install, = if only=20 > to prevent any sendmail issues. >=20 > But I'm not so sure I understand your assessment that 5.x is "worse per= forming=20 > than both 4.x and 6.x." While I agree that 6.x is a great improvement = in=20 > functionality over 5.x, I was not aware of the poor performance record = of=20 > 5.x. =20 >=20 > Do you know of any links to benchmark tests, or other data, which would= =20 > provide some more background on this? >=20 > That kind of data would greatly influence my opinion in this discussion= =2E =20 > Without it I'd be pleased to recommend 5.X, regardless of it's pending = "drop=20 > dead" date, wrt support. I certainly see no need to chain myself to an= y=20 > software release cycle, nor, it seems, does the original poster. I'm i= n awe=20 > of his patience, and clearly he is satisfied with the product if he rem= ains=20 > on 4.11. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > lane > ~Still running 5.x That's comment was based on my experience running a few hundred FreeBSD servers of various models and OS versions. I should qualify that by sayi= ng that 4.x performance really shines when you're using single processor box= es and not running heavily multithreaded applications. On the other hand, 6.x does very well all round, especially with multithreaded applications and multiple CPUs. Of course, you also need 6.x for AMD64 support. 5.x wasn't in any sense bad, but the difference in performance between 5.x and 6.x is very obvious even without running exhaustive benchmarks. = There's no good reason I know of to prefer 5.x to 6.x. Remember too that the policy about when releases were created and how they were numbered changed between 5.x and 6.x: previously a major versio= n number change was made when some target set of functionality was implemented. Now the major version number is bumped every 18 months (I think -- something like that anyhow), using whatever new stuff has gone into HEAD since the last major bump. 6.x is in many ways what the projec= t had intended 5.x to be, before becoming mired in the difficult transition= from 4.x to 5.x. =20 Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. Flat 3 7 Priory Courtyard PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW, UK --------------enig775603D038136B01D3E9A745 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFf+Nx8Mjk52CukIwRA+ryAJ0QItLjwjpX1ZNNm8h1r6sfo8EZQACeIMjV Eucword/6Dl1H6oIwDFboiU= =oOyD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig775603D038136B01D3E9A745-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 11:54:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0D316A4B3 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:54:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com) Received: from dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com (dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com [68.99.120.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2088E43E12 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:51:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com) Received: from dukecmmtao03 ([172.18.22.61]) by dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with SMTP id <20061213115306.DZLE60.dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com@dukecmmtao03> for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 06:53:06 -0500 X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.16 (webedge20-101-1106-20040809) From: Vizion Organization: vizion Communications To: Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 3:53:06 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20061213115306.DZLE60.dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com@dukecmmtao03> Subject: Qlogic QLA2200G & Freebsd 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:54:31 -0000 I have tried to install the above card on an existing FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0 system which refused to boot with the card installed. The processor is AMD Athlon and the motherboard is a Gigabyte GA-K8NS1GMF-9 Can anyone point me to resources that van help or tell me how to go about installing this card? I tried the usual places and could not find anything beyond the fact that their is meant to be support for this Fibre Channel card. Thanks david From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 12:17:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5448316A50D for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:17:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from nagual.nl (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.10.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F0143F71 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:12:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.nl with local; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:13:07 +0100 id 00039826.457FEE53.00012D81 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:13:07 +0100 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20061213121307.GA77041@lothlorien.nagual.nl> References: <1165691646.3362.4.camel@arwen> <539c60b90612111207s31bebbc0nbc82956cbc2136a1@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <539c60b90612111207s31bebbc0nbc82956cbc2136a1@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i From: dick hoogendijk Subject: Re: X server remote login X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:17:40 -0000 On 11 Dec Steve Franks wrote: > 2) edit the .Xaccess file in the location specified for xdm in the > handbook, add a "LISTEN *" line. I'll have to look it up in the handbook yet. I hope I will find in there how to prevent xdm from listening to the outside world. I only want to allow my local network to connect to each other. -- http://nagual.nl/ --- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 6.1 +++ Solaris 10 ++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 13:16:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3246816A407 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:16:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A1B43CCC for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:14:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so73860nzh for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 05:16:21 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=V3X4L7idyrtBK6HBOPFQBoQgn8TkbugWHydfOJfhIZCtBRMWGdJmRUaFqrGt3d8QGSTVr2DbAWp6g/qO8ZVksooTjml3ddb7Au42yQpx52Barz7mVmi3EPwFEc3+gmenQjXpyd4eDpvznhOAJdjchFM43aT5H4LkuzwOanjm/Ws= Received: by 10.65.100.14 with SMTP id c14mr1470711qbm.1166015767446; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 05:16:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.75.14 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 05:16:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <17489c7a0612130516r7fe24ddcm58d7c57f815bd0b4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:16:07 -0500 From: "Chad Gross" To: meilin In-Reply-To: <1461586273.20061213154130@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1461586273.20061213154130@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: where is the full compile option for sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:16:33 -0000 On 12/13/06, meilin wrote: > > hi all: > > The original sendmail's compile option is configured by > m4,the one distribute with FreeBSD has tripped out some files and can not > configure as the usual way,I have man make.conf,however, just find > several items for sendmail and a few instructions. > > I want to know how to fully control the compile option while just do > not install sendmail from a original source package? > > thx very much > > -- > > > meilin > mailto:meilinxiaoxue@gmail.com If you want to eliminate sendmail from base when you recompile the system you will add the following to /etc/make.conf: *NO_SENDMAIL= true* Sendmail and all related programs should no longer be on the system after a rebuild. This is take directly from the manpage: *NO_SENDMAIL* (*bool*) Set to not build sendmail(8) and related programs. Chad From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 13:40:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F2716A403 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:40:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob.middaugh@comcast.net) Received: from alnrmhc13.comcast.net (alnrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.225.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CC343CA0 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:39:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob.middaugh@comcast.net) Received: from freebsd (c714754e.state.nj.us[199.20.117.78]) by comcast.net (alnrmhc13) with SMTP id <20061213134045b1300phsoge>; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:40:45 +0000 From: "Bob M." To: wc_fbsd@xxiii.com In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20061212230551.0319fb30@mailsvr.xxiii.com> References: <20061211185718.E5F0616A56A@hub.freebsd.org> <20061211220901.GB69273@ns.umpquanet.com> <20061211175301.17B7.GERARD@seibercom.net> <6.2.3.4.2.20061212153306.0321bc30@mailsvr.xxiii.com> <000801c71e50$93fc9750$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> <6.2.3.4.2.20061212230551.0319fb30@mailsvr.xxiii.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:44:07 -0500 Message-Id: <1166017447.678.38.camel@freebsd> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Ted Mittelstaedt Subject: Re: List Protocol (was: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob.middaugh@comcast.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:40:49 -0000 On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 23:10 -0500, wc_fbsd@xxiii.com wrote: > Those people > don't comprehend a "mailing list". They do "web pages" and "web > forums" and other clumsy devices. Put it on www.freebsd.org if you > want it easily accessible to such people. "Those people", are probably future FreeBSD user's, and sysadmins. You don't know their age, or anything about them. They could be in college, or high school for all you know. They could be in their 30's in the middle of a career change. They may just not know any better. It would be wise to try to guide "those people", as they too count when it comes to supporting FreeBSD and the community that surrounds it. I think the point is that we are not all born sophisticated user's of FreeBSD. Exactly what would you put on the homepage? A big banner stating that all newbies and clueless people in general should...? A message board, since that's what "such people" are used to? That's my .02 as someone who's been there, done that in probably the most clumsy way possible. :-) Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 13:47:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02DCA16A415; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:47:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9A643CA7; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:46:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.62) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1GuUSg-0001RL-6w>; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:47:54 +0100 Received: from telesto.geoinf.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.86.198]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.62) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1GuUSg-0006x6-5k>; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:47:54 +0100 Message-ID: <45800489.8000200@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:47:53 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" Organization: Freie =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Universit=E4t_Berlin?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 130.133.86.198 Cc: Subject: FreeBSD 6.2/AMD64: supports TYAN Tomcat n3400B motherboard? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:47:56 -0000 Dear Sirs. For building a server system I would like to use the TYAN Tomcat n3400B motherboard (TYAN S2925G2NR). As far as I know, this motherboard utilises the nVidia nForce 3400 chipset which is similar, or even identical to the new nForce5XX chipsets introduced shortly. The main question is: will FreeBSD 6.2/amd64 work with this board? I need especially both NICs and the SATA-II RAID-0/Mirroring facilities. Thank you very much for your comments. Regards, Oliver -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 14:19:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187A616A403 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:19:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wash@wananchi.com) Received: from ns2.wananchi.com (ns2.wananchi.com [62.8.64.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE0143CC1 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:17:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wash@wananchi.com) Received: from wash by ns2.wananchi.com with local (Exim 4.63 #0 (FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE)) id 1GuUx1-0007MZ-07 by authid for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:19:15 +0300 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:19:14 +0300 From: Odhiambo Washington To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061213141914.GR46624@ns2.wananchi.com> Mail-Followup-To: Odhiambo Washington , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Disclaimer: Any views expressed in this message, where not explicitly attributed otherwise, are mine alone!. X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Designation: Systems Administrator, Wananchi Online Ltd. X-Location: Nairobi, KE, East Africa. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Subject: Newbie on tunnelling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:19:23 -0000 I need to create a VPN between two offices. Each has a LAN that is behind a FreeBSD router/firewall. I have managed to do the following manually: hq-office: kldload if_gre.ko ifconfig gre0 create ifconfig gre0 tunnel 62.8.68.94 62.8.82.142 ifconfig gre0 inet 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 route add -net 192.168.1.0/24 -interface gre0 sub-office: kldload if_gre.ko ifconfig gre0 create ifconfig gre0 tunnel 62.8.82.142 62.8.68.94 ifconfig gre0 inet 10.0.0.2 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.252 route add -net 192.168.0.0/24 -interface gre0 Now my simple question is: How do I automate these commands during boot time? -Wash http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html DISCLAIMER: See http://www.wananchi.com/bms/terms.php -- +======================================================================+ |\ _,,,---,,_ | Odhiambo Washington Zzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ | Wananchi Online Ltd. www.wananchi.com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'| Tel: +254 20 313985-9 +254 20 313922 '---''(_/--' `-'\_) | GSM: +254 722 743223 +254 733 744121 +======================================================================+ This is an unauthorized cybernetic announcement. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 15:11:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1FFB16A40F for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:11:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F59843D5D for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:09:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-245-224.51-151.net24.it [151.51.224.245]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBDFGKfc052750 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:16:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBDFAdH1065253; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:10:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <458017EF.5070808@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:10:39 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <83083882-E193-445F-AF3D-E3ECD1E243B1@hughes.net> <20061111063049.GA81772@xor.obsecurity.org> <608516EC-BBD0-40E7-A773-2E8056981FAA@hughes.net> <20061111195632.GA8718@xor.obsecurity.org> <4565812E.6060604@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <4565812E.6060604@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: 6.x hangs on AMD64 again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:11:18 -0000 Andrea Venturoli wrote: > I think I'm having the same problems. > I'm running 6.1(latest patch set)/amd64 on a dual-core Opteron Acer > server with SCSI disks and it is hanging completely and suddenly. > Checking the hardware was the first thing I did, but it really seems ok > (unless it's the second core on the processor). I checked, among the > others: the HDs with the vendor's tools, RAM with MemTest86+ and the CPU > with different stress tools. If anyone can suggest other diagnostics > I'd be happy to comply. > I compiled the kernel with debug info, but that's totally useless, since > it won't dump anything, just hang there; I don't think even DDB would > help, since even the keyboard is not working at that time. If I'm > missing something, I'd be glad to be directed to any pointer. > The box features an em NIC on board, but since it shows a lot of > problems, I removed that driver from the kernel (it's not possible to > turn it off in the BIOS, though) and put in a different add-on card. I > had some shared IRQs, but managed to solve that issue (even if I think > it should not matter). > Next, I'll try to disable SMP as soon as I can and see if it helps. > > Of course upgrading to 6.2 should be attempted, but since this is a > production server and 6.2 is still at RC1... This is just to say that, since SMP was disabled, I've had no problems at all. Not that I like using UP on an x2 CPU... bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 15:48:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC7B16A403 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:48:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phatfish@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8AD143CB0 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:47:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phatfish@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so530384nfc for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 07:48:36 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Kd/r355KppxHONqjEwVYkB5HQjm1raQWqio0D9zLyK1978osJGYcU+di/TLgZ93W4rdM4UHV3NZPmTUcOCeiiYze5O/UYWcfJVBRqQVf4/w4Yb3CL0qrrMPYo0Eafhlpq4y935TG7F9Ze461Alm/yWiYa/v5HOBnzCi+txg07E8= Received: by 10.82.165.1 with SMTP id n1mr183157bue.1166024916497; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 07:48:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.167.16 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 07:48:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <718eeb340612130748p4a96f640qa3a9693f3e8ad4f7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:48:36 +0000 From: Chris To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20061213141914.GR46624@ns2.wananchi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061213141914.GR46624@ns2.wananchi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Newbie on tunnelling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:48:40 -0000 Loading a kernel module at boot time is done by editing (or creating) loader.conf in /boot. And adding [module_name]_load="YES" to load a module, so: if_gre_load="YES". Edit rc.conf for startup configurations. Take a look at "man rc.conf". The sections on network_interfaces and static_routes will be of some help. On 13/12/06, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > I need to create a VPN between two offices. Each has a LAN that is > behind a FreeBSD router/firewall. > > I have managed to do the following manually: > > hq-office: > kldload if_gre.ko > ifconfig gre0 create > ifconfig gre0 tunnel 62.8.68.94 62.8.82.142 > ifconfig gre0 inet 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 > route add -net 192.168.1.0/24 -interface gre0 > > sub-office: > kldload if_gre.ko > ifconfig gre0 create > ifconfig gre0 tunnel 62.8.82.142 62.8.68.94 > ifconfig gre0 inet 10.0.0.2 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.252 > route add -net 192.168.0.0/24 -interface gre0 > > Now my simple question is: How do I automate these commands during boot > time? > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 15:49:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0AE16A47C for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:49:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27D043CCB for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:48:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBDFki1E087876; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:46:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kBDFkiql087875; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:46:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:46:43 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Bob Hall , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061213154643.GA87856@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <6.2.3.4.2.20061212153306.0321bc30@mailsvr.xxiii.com> <000801c71e50$93fc9750$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> <20061213013613.GA36059@kongemord.krig.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061213013613.GA36059@kongemord.krig.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Subject: Re: List Protocol (was: Major Version Upgrade 4.11 to 5.x) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:49:35 -0000 On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 08:36:14PM -0500, Bob Hall wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 04:49:39PM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > a young girl in a tank top and boobs out front > > Isn't that where the boobs are usually installed? > > > Until then STFU you ungrateful bastards. All you once were > > dumb newbies who didn't know FreeBSD from free beer, and > > I'll bet more than a few of you sent e-mail to questions, thinking > > it was an actual person who gave a damn. Boy were you surprised! > > That's exactly what happened to me, back in the time of FBSD 4.3. And I > got a response from an actual knowledgeable person who gave a damn. The > only thing better would have been a young girl in a tank top and boobs > out front. I vote for both. (I'm greedy) ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 15:54:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B3F16A407 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:54:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77D043CB8 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:53:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBDFsbGW012710; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:54:37 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id kBDFsbHc012707; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:54:37 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:54:37 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Brian Levie In-Reply-To: <000001c71e35$d826cd30$37244d51@brianlevie> Message-ID: <20061213085056.U12567@wonkity.com> References: <000001c71e35$d826cd30$37244d51@brianlevie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:54:37 -0700 (MST) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Failure to compile X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:54:38 -0000 On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Brian Levie wrote: > I recently installed FreeBSD 6.1, and copied many Unix files with no > problems at all. However when I try to run the C compiler which worked fine > with Unix, I get the error message '/usr/bin/cc Exec format error Binary > file not executable'. I tried changing permissions and owner with no change. > Any suggestions or won't the unix C compiler not work with FreeBSD? FreeBSD has its own cc. It sounds like you copied cc from some other system over it. FreeBSD can run binaries from some other systems, but it's usually not as simple as just copying them over. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 16:45:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8497916A4FE for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:45:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F2843D91 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:42:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.4) with SMTP id DAA18013 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:44:14 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:44:13 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: /pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-stable/All/ X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:45:58 -0000 Hi all, FreeBSD paqi.smithi.id.au 5.5-STABLE FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #0: Sun Nov 19 20:22:12 EST 2006 root@paqi.smithi.id.au:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PAQI5S_2 i386 On 4th December, after a recent portsnap fetch/update, I ran portupgrade -anPP to prefetch all available packages for a well overdue upgrade of all ports on this box, most dating from 5.4-RELEASE CDs Apart from taking ~7 hours to fetch ~550MB for ~220 packages, and except for a few non-packageable ports, that went fine. Then on 10th December, after much study of UPDATING and adopting the procedures there for KDE, I ran portupgrade -aPP on those packages, which apart from updating PHP4 then installing PHP5 on top of it (which I'll take up later) went better than I'd dared to dream, taking ~8 hours. Awesome work guys! However after then running portsnap fetch/update to pick up anything new since the 4th, and after upgrading portupgrade, ran another portupgrade -anPP to pick up available packages for the ~35 ports newly out of date, intending to finish off by building any remaining ports from sources. I was glad I'd specified -PP .. every fetch from $subject directory failed. Checking manually, then and again tonight, I see that indeed only the versions of files that were (correctly) current at 4th December are still there now. The latest file date there says 17th November. Is this likely a temporary glitch, or do -stable packages only get updated to match the current ports tree after some expectable delay? Cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 17:02:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE4616A5D2 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:02:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from achilles.leela.ws (achilles.leela.ws [66.207.162.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC3A43C9F for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:01:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.0.193] ([158.145.111.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by achilles.leela.ws (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBDH2oQ2039351 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:02:52 -0900 (AKST) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Message-ID: <45803240.7030506@mac.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:02:56 -0900 From: "Peter A. Giessel" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061025 Thunderbird/1.5.0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "O. Hartmann" References: <45800489.8000200@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <45800489.8000200@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2/AMD64: supports TYAN Tomcat n3400B motherboard? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:02:54 -0000 On 2006/12/13 4:47, O. Hartmann seems to have typed: > TYAN Tomcat n3400B motherboard (TYAN S2925G2NR). [snip] > The main question is: will FreeBSD 6.2/amd64 work with this board? I don't see it on the list of tested motherboards. If compatibility is really important to you, check the list: http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64/motherboards.html It may work, it may not. Just because its not on the list, doesn't mean that it won't work, it just hasn't been tested. OTOH, it may not be on the list because it doesn't work. Just from skimming the list, it seems that many nVidia chipsets have issues with their ethernet controller. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 17:26:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B431D16A510 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:26:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wash@wananchi.com) Received: from ns2.wananchi.com (ns2.wananchi.com [62.8.64.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA85D43D83 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:24:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wash@wananchi.com) Received: from wash by ns2.wananchi.com with local (Exim 4.63 #0 (FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE)) id 1GuXrt-00005j-1V by authid for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:26:09 +0300 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:26:09 +0300 From: Odhiambo Washington To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061213172609.GB36107@ns2.wananchi.com> Mail-Followup-To: Odhiambo Washington , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20061213141914.GR46624@ns2.wananchi.com> <718eeb340612130748p4a96f640qa3a9693f3e8ad4f7@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <718eeb340612130748p4a96f640qa3a9693f3e8ad4f7@mail.gmail.com> X-Disclaimer: Any views expressed in this message, where not explicitly attributed otherwise, are mine alone!. X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Designation: Systems Administrator, Wananchi Online Ltd. X-Location: Nairobi, KE, East Africa. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Subject: Re: Newbie on tunnelling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:26:31 -0000 * On 13/12/06 15:48 +0000, Chris wrote: | Loading a kernel module at boot time is done by editing (or creating) | loader.conf in /boot. And adding [module_name]_load="YES" to load a module, | so: if_gre_load="YES". | | Edit rc.conf for startup configurations. Take a look at "man rc.conf". The | sections on network_interfaces and static_routes will be of some help. | | On 13/12/06, Odhiambo Washington wrote: | > | >I need to create a VPN between two offices. Each has a LAN that is | >behind a FreeBSD router/firewall. | > | >I have managed to do the following manually: | > | >hq-office: | >kldload if_gre.ko | >ifconfig gre0 create | >ifconfig gre0 tunnel 62.8.68.94 62.8.82.142 | >ifconfig gre0 inet 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 | >route add -net 192.168.1.0/24 -interface gre0 | > | >sub-office: | >kldload if_gre.ko | >ifconfig gre0 create | >ifconfig gre0 tunnel 62.8.82.142 62.8.68.94 | >ifconfig gre0 inet 10.0.0.2 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.252 | >route add -net 192.168.0.0/24 -interface gre0 | > | >Now my simple question is: How do I automate these commands during boot | >time? | > So, if I compiled kernel with "device gre" (FreeBSD 5.5 here, sorry) then there is no need to load the module via loader.conf, yes? So in rc.conf. would the following suffice (for hq-office)? cloned_interfaces="gre0" ifconfig_gre0="inet 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 tunnel 62.8.68.94 62.8.82.142 up" How about the static route portions? It's still not clear to me how to take care of them in rc.conf. TIA -Wash http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html DISCLAIMER: See http://www.wananchi.com/bms/terms.php -- +======================================================================+ |\ _,,,---,,_ | Odhiambo Washington Zzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ | Wananchi Online Ltd. www.wananchi.com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'| Tel: +254 20 313985-9 +254 20 313922 '---''(_/--' `-'\_) | GSM: +254 722 743223 +254 733 744121 +======================================================================+ APL is a mistake, carried through to perfection. It is the language of the future for the problems of the past: it creates a new generation of coding bums. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 17:32:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B3516A4A0 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:32:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62FF643E57 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:30:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i28so115030wra for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:31:31 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=NjIRHYePuAJPne/cxS+ZTBjIqiZY9/WfomuW8/nnxFiZnnTRaFdys5Sn+pfIt0+slRl6J8fe++iDL83ABcWe1ZQX2/yuKO1yc9Kme1QZ5LUV5kGtFNsPApQsOK6v3aLt/Pc3QxTkSn4eJxzEe6pX2eiSQGHNXB74lXSwihNWE7Y= Received: by 10.90.120.13 with SMTP id s13mr987633agc.1166031091134; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:31:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.75.14 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:31:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <17489c7a0612130931p6313db63jc43845b6bbe7600a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:31:31 -0500 From: "Chad Gross" To: "Peter A. Giessel" In-Reply-To: <45803240.7030506@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <45800489.8000200@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <45803240.7030506@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org, "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2/AMD64: supports TYAN Tomcat n3400B motherboard? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:32:33 -0000 On 12/13/06, Peter A. Giessel wrote: > > On 2006/12/13 4:47, O. Hartmann seems to have typed: > > TYAN Tomcat n3400B motherboard (TYAN S2925G2NR). > [snip] > > The main question is: will FreeBSD 6.2/amd64 work with this board? > > I don't see it on the list of tested motherboards. If compatibility is > really important to you, check the list: > http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64/motherboards.html > > It may work, it may not. Just because its not on the list, doesn't mean > that it won't work, it just hasn't been tested. OTOH, it may not be on > the list because it doesn't work. Just from skimming the list, it seems > that many nVidia chipsets have issues with their ethernet controller. > _______________________________________________ If this is the case than why not include a "Doesn't Work" list as well? That would stop the guessing on whether it doesn't work or hasn't been tested. If hardware doesn't appear on the "It Works" nor the "Doesn't Work" lists, than one can assume that it hasn't been tested. This could save a lot of headaches (and $$$). Chad From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 17:38:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700CA16A403 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:38:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A812343D5F for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:36:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so118312nzh for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:37:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Db3p9b9JHQBU5QxvminogQqy1w6HDHq0jIU2KlblxtM5petKR0zb8CxruOUeCMNHSoFw3PdFkZsx05cMwQtp7Eg4+y5ioQy+x0zH2bHloHZqqmLJUlMyjoj00kXV5bTrMaN0pkGoHPcHYjks2xFrGm+4vK+SChwOE9SIrFTQn0w= Received: by 10.65.251.2 with SMTP id d2mr1865085qbs.1166031465400; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:37:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.75.14 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:37:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <17489c7a0612130937p62307b59i3720ee99b06ebf9e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:37:44 -0500 From: "Chad Gross" To: "Odhiambo Washington" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20061213172609.GB36107@ns2.wananchi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061213141914.GR46624@ns2.wananchi.com> <718eeb340612130748p4a96f640qa3a9693f3e8ad4f7@mail.gmail.com> <20061213172609.GB36107@ns2.wananchi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Newbie on tunnelling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:38:31 -0000 On 12/13/06, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > * On 13/12/06 15:48 +0000, Chris wrote: > | Loading a kernel module at boot time is done by editing (or creating) > | loader.conf in /boot. And adding [module_name]_load="YES" to load a > module, > | so: if_gre_load="YES". > | > | Edit rc.conf for startup configurations. Take a look at "man rc.conf". > The > | sections on network_interfaces and static_routes will be of some help. > | > | On 13/12/06, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > | > > | >I need to create a VPN between two offices. Each has a LAN that is > | >behind a FreeBSD router/firewall. > | > > | >I have managed to do the following manually: > | > > | >hq-office: > | >kldload if_gre.ko > | >ifconfig gre0 create > | >ifconfig gre0 tunnel 62.8.68.94 62.8.82.142 > | >ifconfig gre0 inet 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 > | >route add -net 192.168.1.0/24 -interface gre0 > | > > | >sub-office: > | >kldload if_gre.ko > | >ifconfig gre0 create > | >ifconfig gre0 tunnel 62.8.82.142 62.8.68.94 > | >ifconfig gre0 inet 10.0.0.2 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.252 > | >route add -net 192.168.0.0/24 -interface gre0 > | > > | >Now my simple question is: How do I automate these commands during boot > | >time? > | > > > > > So, if I compiled kernel with "device gre" (FreeBSD 5.5 here, sorry) > then there is no need to load the module via loader.conf, yes? > > So in rc.conf. would the following suffice (for hq-office)? > > cloned_interfaces="gre0" > ifconfig_gre0="inet 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 tunnel 62.8.68.94 62.8.82.142 up" > > How about the static route portions? It's still not clear to me how to > take care of them in rc.conf. > > TIA > > -Wash As I believe you were previously instructed, read the manual (it's all in there): http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=rc.conf&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+6.1-RELEASE&format=html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 17:43:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA9616A4AB for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:43:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from achilles.leela.ws (achilles.leela.ws [66.207.162.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8930243CA9 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:40:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.0.193] ([158.145.111.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by achilles.leela.ws (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBDHfj0u039477 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:41:46 -0900 (AKST) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Message-ID: <45803B5D.8030103@mac.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:41:49 -0900 From: "Peter A. Giessel" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061025 Thunderbird/1.5.0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chad Gross References: <45800489.8000200@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <45803240.7030506@mac.com> <17489c7a0612130931p6313db63jc43845b6bbe7600a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <17489c7a0612130931p6313db63jc43845b6bbe7600a@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2/AMD64: supports TYAN Tomcat n3400B motherboard? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:43:09 -0000 On 2006/12/13 8:31, Chad Gross seems to have typed: > If this is the case than why not include a "Doesn't Work" list as well? That > would stop the guessing on whether it doesn't work or hasn't been tested. If > hardware doesn't appear on the "It Works" nor the "Doesn't Work" lists, than > one can assume that it hasn't been tested. > > This could save a lot of headaches (and $$$). Because it relies on user input. Someone may have tried it and just gave up instead of filing a PR. Read the list, there are a lot that say things like "Stops booting while accessing the SATA drives. Problems with on-board ethernet." or "Random freezes with onboard SATA controller, SATA-RAID not recognized. Onboard ethernet not recognized. AGP not recognized." That sounds like a "doesn't work" to me, however if the user just gives up, nothing is going to be reported. P.S. cross-posting two lists is bad form. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 17:44:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F9A16A5AA for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:44:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brunson@brunson.com) Received: from mail.comfortechassist.com (66-162-108-54.static.twtelecom.net [66.162.108.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF9E43DE8 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:41:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brunson@brunson.com) Received: by mail.comfortechassist.com (Postfix, from userid 509) id 1103A11A0042; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:42:48 -0700 (MST) Received: from [172.20.31.94] (unknown [12.109.229.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.comfortechassist.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96AE511A003D for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:42:46 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <45803B96.5090402@brunson.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:42:46 -0700 From: Eric Brunson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.6 (2005-12-07) on s4.comfortechassist.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham version=3.0.6 Subject: Increasing ptys/ttys beyond 128 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:44:43 -0000 I've done some searching on the web, but everything I've come across is either out of date and says to recompile the kernel, or else says that after 5.1 the devfs does it automatically. I don't think that's the case. I'm running 6.1 and I need more than the [pt]ty[p-sP-S] devices that will auto-clone in devfs. I've tried adding lines like the following to /etc/default/devfs.rules: add path 'ptyt*' unhide add path 'ttyt*' unhide But that doesn't do the trick. The syntax "unhide" implies to me that the [p-sP-S] nodes exist but but are hidden by the hide_all ruleset. What do I have to do to allow the creation of more ptys? Thanks, e. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 18:00:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782B116A412 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:00:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julien_chaffraix@yahoo.fr) Received: from messel.emse.fr (messel.emse.fr [193.49.175.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA2E43F49 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:55:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julien_chaffraix@yahoo.fr) Received: from localhost (localhost.emse.fr [127.0.0.1]) by messel.emse.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00C75DDD2; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:55:23 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at emse.fr Received: from messel.emse.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (messel.emse.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uc5nLBYKfAKe; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:55:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.0.1.100] (unknown [10.0.1.100]) by messel.emse.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:55:23 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45803EC8.6040804@yahoo.fr> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:56:24 +0100 From: julien Chaffraix User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nathan Watson References: <3083783.171165792287615.JavaMail.root@cirrus> In-Reply-To: <3083783.171165792287615.JavaMail.root@cirrus> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: ipf stateful rules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:00:50 -0000 Nathan Watson wrote: > Hello, > I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 with IPF/IPNAT, and I'm having a problem getting my rules to work. The problem is mainly that I want no restrictions on outbound traffic, and I'm not sure how to apply stateful filtering to that. I have the following rule (hme0 is my external interface): > > pass out quick on hme0 all > > If I change that to "pass out quick on hme0 all keep state," will that only open the port that the outbound packet was on? Are there any problems that can arise from allowing all outbound traffic? At the moment, my ruleset doesn't pass packets at all... I'm just having lots of troubles here. My ruleset is below, and everything seems to be caught by the last block all rule. Any suggestions? > > You can use "pass out quick on hme0 all keep state" just to allow outgoing traffic without restriction. You didn't mention the IPNAT ruleset which could explain your problem. For your use I would have something like : map hm0 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0.0.0.0/32 Cheers, Julien > Thanks, > nwatson > > # no restrictions on internal LAN > pass out quick on hme1 all > pass in quick on hme1 all > > # no restrictions on loopback > pass out quick on lo0 all > pass in quick on lo0 all > > # no outbound restrictions > pass out quick on hme0 all keep state > > # block all from non-routable or reserved address space > > block in quick on hme0 from 172.16.0.0/12 to any # private > block in quick on hme0 from 10.0.0.0/8 to any # private > block in quick on hme0 from 127.0.0.0/8 to any # loopback > block in quick on hme0 from 0.0.0.0/8 to any # loopback > block in quick on hme0 from 169.254.0.0/16 to any # dhcp auto-config > block in quick on hme0 from 192.0.2.0/24 to any # reserved for docs > block in quick on hme0 from 204.152.64.0/23 to any # sun cluster interconnect > block in quick on hme0 from 224.0.0.0/3 to any # class d & e multicast > > # inbound blocks > > block in quick on hme0 all with frags # frags > block in quick on hme0 proto tcp all with short # short tcp packets > block in quick on hme0 all with opt lsrr # source routed packets > block in quick on hme0 all with opt ssrr # source routed packets > block in log first quick on hme0 proto tcp from any to any flags FUP # nmap os fingerprint attempts, log > block in quick on hme0 all with ipopts # anything with special options > block in quick on hme0 proto icmp all icmp-type 8 # public pings > block in log first quick on hme0 proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 137 # netbios name > block in log first quick on hme0 proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 138 # netbios datagram > block in log first quick on hme0 proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 139 # netbios session > block in log first quick on hme0 proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 81 # hosts2 name server requests > > # allow these > > pass in quick on hme0 proto tcp from any to any port = 22 flags S keep state # ssh > pass in quick on hme0 proto tcp from any to any port = 25 flags S keep state # smtp > pass in quick on hme0 proto tcp from any to any port = 236 flags S keep state # http > pass in quick on hme0 proto tcp from any to any port = 237 flags S keep state # zimbra https > pass in quick on hme0 proto tcp from any to any port = 113 flags S keep state # ident > pass in quick on hme0 proto tcp from any to any port 5800 >< 5900 flags S keep state # vnc > pass in quick on hme0 proto tcp/udp from any to any port 6881 >< 6889 keep state # bittorrent > pass in quick on hme0 proto tcp from any to any port = 7071 flags S keep state # zimbra admin https > > # block, log all remaining traffic > > block in log first quick on hme0 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 18:12:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB6A16A4D0 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:12:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex@purificator.net) Received: from web54107.mail.yahoo.com (web54107.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.37.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3096E43CCA for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:10:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alex@purificator.net) Received: (qmail 67292 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Dec 2006 18:12:03 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: bDWjX2IVM1mEOtJn3wLVt4cLn_EiQoQl89ZGOV8.Ak8eNLtxDXLJCoTscS.44OY_ZxWsIiw9fJg7AUdlVb7F78CZEkyIIIClWo94ITL5E3KgzJp3Hh96zK0LuqadN5O0jaEqwvtlfGEjaH6WpoV_ONtGspO0O1tF5MHPWU0dMry5zfF8Q2hhg92XzWDPkPKPa2IjTowCzNlEAwGbu0kZDQ21YXX9vw-- Received: from [192.0.35.211] by web54107.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:12:03 PST Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:12:03 -0800 (PST) From: Alex Toth To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <262847.65339.qm@web54107.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: pxe jumpstart sysinstall doesn't see disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:12:23 -0000 I'm setting up a pxe boot/jumpstart (using 6.1-RELEASE) and sysinstall won't recognize the drive (SATA on a Dell 1425). The pxe install starts off fine, up through the point where sysinstall gets its DHCP information (per my custom install.cfg, relevant portions copied below). If I install off CD everything works; sysinstall sees ad4 and can work its magic on it, but using the *same* sysinstall (pulled from the CD image), the *same* mfsroot (with the addition of the install.cfg), and the *same* kernel, it doesn't work for the net install. As I mentioned above, after getting an IP address via DHCP sysinstall bombs with this message: +----------------------------- Message -----------------------------+ |No disks found! Please verify that your disk controller is being | |properly probed at boot time. See the Hardware Guide on the | |Documentation menu for clues on diagnosing this type of problem. | +-----------------------------------------------------------(100%)--+ When I try to go through an interactive install at that point I get the same message from any avenue that tries to pull up disk partitioning. At that point I drop to a shell where I can see /dev/ad4*, and can newfs /dev/ad4. I start a second instance of sysinstall which has the same problem, but creates a sysinstall.debug that says it sucessfully detected ad4. I've read through the FreeBSD handbook's section on jumpstart, Doug White's "quick and dirty" guide, and a few others (including the rather old but very helpful http://www.tnpi.biz/computing/freebsd/pxe-netboot.shtml). Unfortunately, they all stop at sysinstall and assume it works from then on. At this point I'm short on troubleshooting ideas and would appreciate help --or experience-- to get me back on track. This is the end of the sysinstall.debug, including the probe lines that find ad4: DEBUG: deviceTry: Making raw device for /dev/cuad15 [28, 143] DEBUG: deviceTry: final attempt for /mnt/dev/cuad15 returns -1 DEBUG: Found a disk device named ad4 DEBUG: Found a DOS partition ad4s2 on drive ad4 DEBUG: mkdir(/tmp/.doc) DEBUG: mkdir(/tmp/.doc..) DEBUG: Executing command `/usr/bin/gunzip < /stand/help/INSTALL.TXT > /tmp/.doc/doc.tmp' /usr/bin/gunzip: not found DEBUG: Command `/usr/bin/gunzip < /stand/help/INSTALL.TXT > /tmp/.doc/doc.tmp' returns status of 127 DEBUG: Executing command `/usr/bin/gunzip < /stand/help/INSTALL.TXT > /tmp/.doc/doc.tmp' /usr/bin/gunzip: not found DEBUG: Command `/usr/bin/gunzip < /stand/help/INSTALL.TXT > /tmp/.doc/doc.tmp' returns status of 127 DEBUG: Executing command `/usr/bin/gunzip < /stand/help/INSTALL.TXT > /tmp/.doc/doc.tmp' /usr/bin/gunzip: not found DEBUG: Command `/usr/bin/gunzip < /stand/help/INSTALL.TXT > /tmp/.doc/doc.tmp' returns status of 127 DEBUG: Executing command `rm -rf /tmp/.doc' DEBUG: Command `rm -rf /tmp/.doc' returns status of 0 Here are the network and disk sections of my install.cfg. Yes, I'm intentionally using the second interface (em1) and on a Dell 1425 with a single SATA drive: ad4. ################################ # Which installation device to use nfs=10.0.0.9:/tftpboot/FreeBSD netDev=em1 # N.B. dell 1425 gig e tryDHCP=YES mediaSetNFS ################################ * snip * ################################ # Now set the parameters for the partition editor on disk 0. disk=ad4 # N.B. dell 1425 partition=all bootManager=standard diskPartitionEditor #diskPartitionWrite ################################ ################################ # All sizes are expressed in 512 byte blocks! # # 2G /, 2G swap, 8G /var 8388608, /usr gets the rest # ad4s1-1=ufs 4194304 / ad4s1-2=swap 4194304 none ad4s1-3=ufs 16777216 /var ad4s1-4=ufs 0 /usr # Let's do it! diskLabelEditor #diskLabelCommit From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 18:20:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E30B16A4B3 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:20:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wayne@klentaq.com) Received: from klentaq.com (mail.etaq.com [66.80.150.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515D643D9E for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:17:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wayne@klentaq.com) Received: by klentaq.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9C33C17061; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:19:18 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:19:18 -0600 From: "Wayne M. Barnes" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061213181918.GA7906@klentaq.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Missing pkg-descr X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:20:20 -0000 Dear FreeBSD, The following "Missing pkg-descr" is happening to me a lot, with many packages. This time it was during "portinstall jdk15". ===> Installing for m4-1.4.8_1 ===> Generating temporary packing list ** Missing pkg-descr for m4-1.4.8_1. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/m4. *** Error code 1 This time it is on a brand-new install of FreeBSD 6.2. How can I be responsible for the "pkg-descr". This is the second time I have asked this question. I got no help before. My email was down briefly. Did I miss the answer? Thank you, -- Wayne M. Barnes, Ph.D., President lab at: DNA Polymerase Technology, Inc. The Inventery 11 Princeton Avenue 1508 S. Grand Blvd University City, MO 63130 St. Louis, MO 63104 fax (314)754-9556 Phone: 314.680.0575 email: wayne@klentaq.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 18:30:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 074E516A50C for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:30:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wayne@klentaq.com) Received: from klentaq.com (mail.etaq.com [66.80.150.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDCE743FE1 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:21:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wayne@klentaq.com) Received: by klentaq.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 207DC17147; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:23:24 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:23:24 -0600 From: "Wayne M. Barnes" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061213182324.GA7942@klentaq.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Missing pkg-descr - Correction X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:30:00 -0000 Correction: This problem happened during "make all install" for the port java/jdk15 (Not "portinstall") ----- Forwarded message from "Wayne M. Barnes" ----- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:19:18 -0600 From: "Wayne M. Barnes" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Missing pkg-descr User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Dear FreeBSD, The following "Missing pkg-descr" is happening to me a lot, with many packages. This time it was during "portinstall jdk15". ===> Installing for m4-1.4.8_1 ===> Generating temporary packing list ** Missing pkg-descr for m4-1.4.8_1. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/m4. *** Error code 1 This time it is on a brand-new install of FreeBSD 6.2. How can I be responsible for the "pkg-descr". This is the second time I have asked this question. I got no help before. My email was down briefly. Did I miss the answer? Thank you, -- Wayne M. Barnes, Ph.D., President lab at: DNA Polymerase Technology, Inc. The Inventery 11 Princeton Avenue 1508 S. Grand Blvd University City, MO 63130 St. Louis, MO 63104 fax (314)754-9556 Phone: 314.680.0575 email: wayne@klentaq.com ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Wayne M. Barnes, Ph.D., President lab at: DNA Polymerase Technology, Inc. The Inventery 11 Princeton Avenue 1508 S. Grand Blvd University City, MO 63130 St. Louis, MO 63104 fax (314)754-9556 Phone: 314.680.0575 email: wayne@klentaq.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 18:31:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9967B16A602 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:31:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A4943DE9 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:29:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from c83-253-29-241.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.29.241]:61733 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GuYsZ-0004Dd-5M for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:30:56 +0100 Received: (qmail 46324 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2006 19:30:51 +0100 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with SMTP; 13 Dec 2006 19:30:51 +0100 Received: (qmail 80158 invoked by uid 1001); 13 Dec 2006 19:30:51 +0100 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:30:51 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: Eric Brunson Message-ID: <20061213183051.GA79921@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Eric Brunson , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45803B96.5090402@brunson.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45803B96.5090402@brunson.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-ACL-Warn: Too high rate of unknown addresses received from you X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1GuYsZ-0004Dd-5M. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1GuYsZ-0004Dd-5M e35084c127098d604c0ef73e2a350209 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Increasing ptys/ttys beyond 128 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:31:34 -0000 On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:42:46AM -0700, Eric Brunson wrote: > I've done some searching on the web, but everything I've come across is > either out of date and says to recompile the kernel, or else says that > after 5.1 the devfs does it automatically. I don't think that's the case. > > I'm running 6.1 and I need more than the [pt]ty[p-sP-S] devices that > will auto-clone in devfs. > > I've tried adding lines like the following to /etc/default/devfs.rules: > > add path 'ptyt*' unhide > add path 'ttyt*' unhide > > But that doesn't do the trick. The syntax "unhide" implies to me that > the [p-sP-S] nodes exist but but are hidden by the hide_all ruleset. > > What do I have to do to allow the creation of more ptys? I don't think you can have more than 256 pty devices in 6.1 The code in the kernel that handles ptys only allow for pty[pqrsPQRS][0-9a-v] (and the corresponding tty[pqrsPQRS][0-9a-v] of course.) This gives you a total of 8*32 = 256 pty devices. (Not 128 as the subjectline implies.) (I don't think you could have more than 256 ptys back in 4.x either, but back then the default setup only gave you 32 ptys, and all the instructions I have seen for increasing that number only told how to let you use all 256 possible devices, but not more than that.) To get more ptys than 256 you will have to start hacking the kernel. (There does seem to be an alternate naming system for ptys available in 7-CURRENT but it has not been back-ported to 6.x. See the pty(4) manpage from -CURRENT for details on how it works.) -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 18:36:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6377416A407 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:36:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2A343CA2 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:34:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so128754nzh for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:36:25 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=rz/D5BcrG0FIJM7j1WBUC/CAKku08e6Nej1Ah7QuKYhYTS6qTf9e1xcZFPY0bqxZiTyWeHBirAlMkM1mPaxG+8AiJIT/XOWZFIWGHINWv8hxJFfMeaKbXS59I94I7zN5BT9bZ8e7/sqtHwpBP4yKfOqKJ6jo7UZbkmqKRg+T6jo= Received: by 10.65.239.14 with SMTP id q14mr1896620qbr.1166034985794; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:36:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.75.14 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:36:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <17489c7a0612131036p3a3fcd5fg317884859e2102ee@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:36:25 -0500 From: "Chad Gross" To: "Wayne M. Barnes" In-Reply-To: <20061213182324.GA7942@klentaq.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061213182324.GA7942@klentaq.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Missing pkg-descr - Correction X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:36:28 -0000 Wyane, Is there a specific reason you need ports/jdk15? If not, try java/diablo-jdk15. The latter is the result of the FreeBSD Foundation's deal with Sun. Chad On 12/13/06, Wayne M. Barnes wrote: > > Correction: This problem happened during "make all install" > for the port java/jdk15 (Not "portinstall") > > ----- Forwarded message from "Wayne M. Barnes" ----- > > Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:19:18 -0600 > From: "Wayne M. Barnes" > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Missing pkg-descr > User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i > > Dear FreeBSD, > > The following "Missing pkg-descr" is happening to me a lot, with many > packages. This time it was during "portinstall jdk15". > > ===> Installing for m4-1.4.8_1 > ===> Generating temporary packing list > ** Missing pkg-descr for m4-1.4.8_1. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/m4. > *** Error code 1 > > This time it is on a brand-new install of FreeBSD 6.2. > > How can I be responsible for the "pkg-descr". > > This is the second time I have asked this question. I got > no help before. My email was down briefly. Did I miss the answer? > > Thank you, > > -- > > Wayne M. Barnes, Ph.D., President lab at: > DNA Polymerase Technology, Inc. The Inventery > 11 Princeton Avenue 1508 S. Grand Blvd > University City, MO 63130 St. Louis, MO 63104 > > fax (314)754-9556 Phone: 314.680.0575 email: wayne@klentaq.com > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > -- > > Wayne M. Barnes, Ph.D., President lab at: > DNA Polymerase Technology, Inc. The Inventery > 11 Princeton Avenue 1508 S. Grand Blvd > University City, MO 63130 St. Louis, MO 63104 > > fax (314)754-9556 Phone: 314.680.0575 email: wayne@klentaq.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 18:36:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6019116A4AB for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:36:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 125AA43CB2 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:35:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin05-en2 [10.13.10.150]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout07/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kBDIaqGQ024175; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:36:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from [17.214.13.96] (a17-214-13-96.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin05/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kBDIaokG009551; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:36:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20061213182324.GA7942@klentaq.com> References: <20061213182324.GA7942@klentaq.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:36:49 -0800 To: "Wayne M. Barnes" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-scanned: yes Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Missing pkg-descr - Correction X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:36:56 -0000 On Dec 13, 2006, at 10:23 AM, Wayne M. Barnes wrote: > The following "Missing pkg-descr" is happening to me a lot, > with many > packages. This time it was during "portinstall jdk15". > > ===> Installing for m4-1.4.8_1 > ===> Generating temporary packing list > ** Missing pkg-descr for m4-1.4.8_1. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/m4. > *** Error code 1 > > This time it is on a brand-new install of FreeBSD 6.2. > > How can I be responsible for the "pkg-descr". > > This is the second time I have asked this question. I got > no help before. My email was down briefly. Did I miss the answer? This suggests that your ports tree is incomplete for some reason; you should review how you are updating the ports tree and see whether there is some problem there-- or check the Handbook for other methods of updating /usr/ports... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 18:59:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 071C716A412 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:59:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brunson@brunson.com) Received: from mail.comfortechassist.com (66-162-108-54.static.twtelecom.net [66.162.108.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A92943DE0 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:55:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brunson@brunson.com) Received: by mail.comfortechassist.com (Postfix, from userid 509) id E0B9A11A0032; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:56:11 -0700 (MST) Received: from [172.20.31.94] (unknown [12.109.229.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.comfortechassist.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E8711A0036 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:56:10 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <45804CC9.7090807@brunson.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:56:09 -0700 From: Eric Brunson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45803B96.5090402@brunson.com> <20061213183051.GA79921@owl.midgard.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20061213183051.GA79921@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.6 (2005-12-07) on s4.comfortechassist.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=ham version=3.0.6 Subject: Re: Increasing ptys/ttys beyond 128 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:59:36 -0000 Erik Trulsson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:42:46AM -0700, Eric Brunson wrote: > >> I've done some searching on the web, but everything I've come across is >> either out of date and says to recompile the kernel, or else says that >> after 5.1 the devfs does it automatically. I don't think that's the case. >> >> I'm running 6.1 and I need more than the [pt]ty[p-sP-S] devices that >> will auto-clone in devfs. >> >> I've tried adding lines like the following to /etc/default/devfs.rules: >> >> add path 'ptyt*' unhide >> add path 'ttyt*' unhide >> >> But that doesn't do the trick. The syntax "unhide" implies to me that >> the [p-sP-S] nodes exist but but are hidden by the hide_all ruleset. >> >> What do I have to do to allow the creation of more ptys? >> > > I don't think you can have more than 256 pty devices in 6.1 > > The code in the kernel that handles ptys only allow for pty[pqrsPQRS][0-9a-v] > (and the corresponding tty[pqrsPQRS][0-9a-v] of course.) This gives you a > total of 8*32 = 256 pty devices. (Not 128 as the subjectline implies.) > Actually, that is incredibly helpful. We're having problems with expect, but when expect searches for a free pty, it only searches [0-9a-f], which only gives us 128 ptys. There's another problem with this search resulting in failures after 64 pty allocations which I was trying to avoid patching in expect, but if I can get 256 processes out of it, I'll patch away. Man, 5 days of searching the web and you set me straight in 48 minutes... I should have started here first. :-) Thanks a *ton*! > (I don't think you could have more than 256 ptys back in 4.x either, but > back then the default setup only gave you 32 ptys, and all the instructions > I have seen for increasing that number only told how to let you use all 256 > possible devices, but not more than that.) > > > To get more ptys than 256 you will have to start hacking the kernel. (There > does seem to be an alternate naming system for ptys available in 7-CURRENT > but it has not been back-ported to 6.x. See the pty(4) manpage from > -CURRENT for details on how it works. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 19:12:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C0B216A412 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:12:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E82143CA6 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:11:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so239976uge for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:12:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=bdVvwp/LVlnkTm6H0eKNWtz1Qu9YvJRwtGaxcTcX8SLOiO+wttUH4AT500YrbhbaqlnvrmoG1rXzqULZvuMZHi6bmzhlkkTCpBFMNQPOlKLnx96fqoQei6sVlaGzVJmH27xMENm30PpCCyvbeR/OIWYlF5aDkwKEtbPAB/ibOAo= Received: by 10.78.185.16 with SMTP id i16mr905710huf.1166037167723; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:12:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.161.19 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:12:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7a4a15bd0612131112x25e1cc4mcfb85843edcf596@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:12:47 -0600 From: Tuareg To: Lane In-Reply-To: <200612081139.27993.lane@joeandlane.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061206034909.27125.qmail@web37214.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200612052208.54833.lane@joeandlane.com> <7a4a15bd0612080916g1e25d1eer63a40608b82779ec@mail.gmail.com> <200612081139.27993.lane@joeandlane.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:12:50 -0000 Hi Lane, We have tried that too.. We have the same rules that in the other servers where we can send e-mail without launching sendmail as daemon. Anyway we have tried disabling all the rules with: ipfw -f -q flush And listing the rules: 65535 87358 61876 allow ip from any to any mail -v root@localhost Subject: test test. . EOT root@localhost... Connecting to localhost.my.domain. via relay... root@localhost... Deferred: Operation timed out with localhost.my.domain. mail -v user@other.domain.com Subject: test test . EOT user@other.domain.com... Connecting to localhost.my.domain. via relay... user@other.domain.com... Deferred: Operation timed out with localhost.my.domain. Also searched about sendmail in the BSD FAQ, Handbook, if we should change some file in /etc/mail, but (maybe should look again?) didn't find anything about which file should we modify, let's say.. submit.mc? freebsd.submit.mc? Suggestions? Thank you for your help. On 12/8/06, Lane wrote: > > On Friday 08 December 2006 11:16, Tuareg wrote: > > On 12/5/06, Lane wrote: > > > On Tuesday 05 December 2006 21:49, Wasp King wrote: > > > > is there a way that one can specify a log place to see > > > > daily logs like you receive from root@localhost, when > > > > sendmail is turned on? > > > > > > > > there must be a way to enable only local mail > > > > delivery...but I am not sure how.. > > > > > > > > would like to shut down sendmail but want to see > > > > security logs. > > > > > > > > thanks. > > > > > > > > Zach > > > > using FreeBSD 4.2 and sendmail 8.x (maybe). > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________________ > > >__ IIRC, sendmail has three controlling values in /etc/rc.conf: > > > > > > sendmail_enable="YES" > > > sendmail_enable="NO" > > > and > > > sendmail_enable="NONE" > > > > > > The third value, "NONE," causes the boot process to ignore any attempt > to > > > start sendmail. > > > > > > The second value, "NO," causes the boot process to start sendmail for > > > "local > > > delivery, only" (i.e. do NOT accept inbound connections from external > > > hosts). > > > > > > The first value, "YES," causes the boot process to start sendmail for > > > outgoing > > > and incoming SMTP connections. > > > > > > There are many "tweaks" that you can use in /etc/rc.conf - (refer > > > to /etc/defaults/rc.conf) - that will allow various flavors of > sendmail > > > usage. See also, /etc/rc.sendmail. > > > > > > In your case sendmail_enable="NO" should allow the local system to > > > send "periodic" information to root@localhost, or whatever alias you > use > > > in /etc/mail/aliases, while disallowing external hosts from sending > email > > > by > > > way of the local host. Note that this requires that you pay heed > > > to /etc/mail/Makefile and associated README documentation > > > in /usr/src/contrib/sendmail and below. > > > > > > Best of luck! > > > > > > > > > lane > > > > Hi... Where I'm working, have many servers with FreeBSD 4.x and 5.x, > this > > servers are enable to send mail but the daemon of sendmail is not > launched. > > > > Now, we have installed FreeBSD 6.1 STABLE, but can't reply this schema. > > > > Which file needs to be modified in /etc/mail to allow the server to send > > emails to our real mailserver so we can receive the results of some > scripts > > without launching the daemon of sendmail? > > > > We have tried using sendmail="NO", in rc.conf, but we only get this > > messages: > > > > user@mydomain.com... Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay... > > user@mydomain.com... Deferred: Permission denied > > > > Thank you for your help in advance. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Tuareg, > > Your problem is likely related to ipfw, or "firewall_type", > "firewall_enable" > in /etc/rc.conf. > > The "permission denied" error implies that your firewall ruleset is > preventing > the outgoing connection. Try: > > ipfw show > > to see your current firewall rules. > > Also read through /etc/rc.firewall and /etc/defaults/rc.conf to get some > more > information on the firewall issues. > > When you've gotten that resolved you should have enough information to get > sendmail working the way you want. > > lane > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 19:30:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A75816A412 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:30:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C48D843C9D for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:29:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GuZoP-000198-Cu; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:30:41 -0500 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost.localnet.local [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kBDJXLF3026553; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:33:21 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id kBDJXKgE026457; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:33:20 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: Tuareg Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:33:20 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061206034909.27125.qmail@web37214.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200612081139.27993.lane@joeandlane.com> <7a4a15bd0612131112x25e1cc4mcfb85843edcf596@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7a4a15bd0612131112x25e1cc4mcfb85843edcf596@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612131333.20652.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79c289d443c7bdddb71bea775f2f40492f350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:30:53 -0000 Tuareg ... follow to difficult it find I as post top don't please ... to say it another way ... please don't top post, as I find it difficult to follow ... On Wednesday 13 December 2006 13:12, Tuareg wrote: > Hi Lane, > > We have tried that too.. > > We have the same rules that in the other servers where we can send e-mail > without launching sendmail as daemon. > > Anyway we have tried disabling all the rules with: ipfw -f -q flush > > And listing the rules: > > 65535 87358 61876 allow ip from any to any > > > mail -v root@localhost > Subject: test > test. > . > EOT > root@localhost... Connecting to localhost.my.domain. via relay... > root@localhost... Deferred: Operation timed out with localhost.my.domain. > > mail -v user@other.domain.com > Subject: test > test > . > EOT > user@other.domain.com... Connecting to localhost.my.domain. via relay... > user@other.domain.com... Deferred: Operation timed out with > localhost.my.domain. > > > Also searched about sendmail in the BSD FAQ, Handbook, if we should change > some file in /etc/mail, but (maybe should look again?) didn't find anything > about which file should we modify, let's say.. submit.mc? > freebsd.submit.mc? > > Suggestions? > > Thank you for your help. > > On 12/8/06, Lane wrote: > > On Friday 08 December 2006 11:16, Tuareg wrote: > > > On 12/5/06, Lane wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 05 December 2006 21:49, Wasp King wrote: > > > > > is there a way that one can specify a log place to see > > > > > daily logs like you receive from root@localhost, when > > > > > sendmail is turned on? > > > > > > > > > > there must be a way to enable only local mail > > > > > delivery...but I am not sure how.. > > > > > > > > > > would like to shut down sendmail but want to see > > > > > security logs. > > > > > > > > > > thanks. > > > > > > > > > > Zach > > > > > using FreeBSD 4.2 and sendmail 8.x (maybe). > > > > _________________________________________________________________________ > > > > > >__ IIRC, sendmail has three controlling values in /etc/rc.conf: > > > > > > > > sendmail_enable="YES" > > > > sendmail_enable="NO" > > > > and > > > > sendmail_enable="NONE" > > > > > > > > The third value, "NONE," causes the boot process to ignore any > > > > attempt > > > > to > > > > > > start sendmail. > > > > > > > > The second value, "NO," causes the boot process to start sendmail for > > > > "local > > > > delivery, only" (i.e. do NOT accept inbound connections from external > > > > hosts). > > > > > > > > The first value, "YES," causes the boot process to start sendmail for > > > > outgoing > > > > and incoming SMTP connections. > > > > > > > > There are many "tweaks" that you can use in /etc/rc.conf - (refer > > > > to /etc/defaults/rc.conf) - that will allow various flavors of > > > > sendmail > > > > > > usage. See also, /etc/rc.sendmail. > > > > > > > > In your case sendmail_enable="NO" should allow the local system to > > > > send "periodic" information to root@localhost, or whatever alias you > > > > use > > > > > > in /etc/mail/aliases, while disallowing external hosts from sending > > > > email > > > > > > by > > > > way of the local host. Note that this requires that you pay heed > > > > to /etc/mail/Makefile and associated README documentation > > > > in /usr/src/contrib/sendmail and below. > > > > > > > > Best of luck! > > > > > > > > > > > > lane > > > > > > Hi... Where I'm working, have many servers with FreeBSD 4.x and 5.x, > > > > this > > > > > servers are enable to send mail but the daemon of sendmail is not > > > > launched. > > > > > Now, we have installed FreeBSD 6.1 STABLE, but can't reply this schema. > > > > > > Which file needs to be modified in /etc/mail to allow the server to > > > send emails to our real mailserver so we can receive the results of > > > some > > > > scripts > > > > > without launching the daemon of sendmail? > > > > > > We have tried using sendmail="NO", in rc.conf, but we only get this > > > messages: > > > > > > user@mydomain.com... Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay... > > > user@mydomain.com... Deferred: Permission denied > > > > > > Thank you for your help in advance. > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > Tuareg, > > > > Your problem is likely related to ipfw, or "firewall_type", > > "firewall_enable" > > in /etc/rc.conf. > > > > The "permission denied" error implies that your firewall ruleset is > > preventing > > the outgoing connection. Try: > > > > ipfw show > > > > to see your current firewall rules. > > > > Also read through /etc/rc.firewall and /etc/defaults/rc.conf to get some > > more > > information on the firewall issues. > > > > When you've gotten that resolved you should have enough information to > > get sendmail working the way you want. > > > > lane > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Tuareg, What happens when you do this: telnet localhost Does the connection time out? Or do you get a sendmail prompt? I'm sort of mixed up on the order of the posts, here. But let me see if I can rephrase the problem .... and then possibly help you find a solution ... It seems to me that the problem is that you cannot determine how to make FreeBSD 6.x do like other hosts under your influence, so that it will send email from root@localhost to another (possibly a hub) server? Is that correct? First I assume that these other FreeBSD installations are also using sendmail. If that is NOT correct then your best hope is to replicate your mta configuration from those other hosts. In fact that might not be a bad idea regardless of what they are running :) But again, assuming you want to run sendmail and ONLY allow the localhost to transmit out to another host for collection and/or distribution, enter this value into /etc/rc.conf: sendmail_enable="NO" Now edit /etc/mail/freebsd.mc. Locate the term "SMART_HOST," uncomment that line, and enter the IP address or fully qualified domain name of your upstream server in place of 'your.isp.mail.server' Note: If 'your.isp.mail.server' is NOT resolvable on the localhost, then you must use the IP address. When you use the IP address, you must put it in [square brackets], like [192.168.2.1]. Now from /etc/mail, type make all install then shutdown and restart the server using your method of choice, or just type /etc/rc.d/sendmail restart And try to send email again. All should work now. But you must remember to configure the TARGET mail server to allow this host to send. I'll leave that as an exercise for you. lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 19:31:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A569816A5DF for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:31:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brunson@brunson.com) Received: from mail.comfortechassist.com (66-162-108-54.static.twtelecom.net [66.162.108.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DE443CB6 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:30:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brunson@brunson.com) Received: by mail.comfortechassist.com (Postfix, from userid 509) id 4DE1A11A0036; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:31:32 -0700 (MST) Received: from [172.20.31.94] (unknown [12.109.229.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.comfortechassist.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2DD11A003A for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:31:29 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <45805511.207@brunson.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:31:29 -0700 From: Eric Brunson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45803B96.5090402@brunson.com> <20061213183051.GA79921@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <45804CC9.7090807@brunson.com> In-Reply-To: <45804CC9.7090807@brunson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.6 (2005-12-07) on s4.comfortechassist.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=ham version=3.0.6 Subject: Re: Increasing ptys/ttys beyond 128 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:31:48 -0000 I have a patch for expect, what's the process for getting it reviewed for incorporation into ports? Eric Brunson wrote: > Erik Trulsson wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:42:46AM -0700, Eric Brunson wrote: >> >>> I've done some searching on the web, but everything I've come across >>> is either out of date and says to recompile the kernel, or else says >>> that after 5.1 the devfs does it automatically. I don't think >>> that's the case. >>> >>> I'm running 6.1 and I need more than the [pt]ty[p-sP-S] devices that >>> will auto-clone in devfs. >>> >>> I've tried adding lines like the following to /etc/default/devfs.rules: >>> >>> add path 'ptyt*' unhide >>> add path 'ttyt*' unhide >>> >>> But that doesn't do the trick. The syntax "unhide" implies to me >>> that the [p-sP-S] nodes exist but but are hidden by the hide_all >>> ruleset. >>> >>> What do I have to do to allow the creation of more ptys? >>> >> >> I don't think you can have more than 256 pty devices in 6.1 >> >> The code in the kernel that handles ptys only allow for >> pty[pqrsPQRS][0-9a-v] >> (and the corresponding tty[pqrsPQRS][0-9a-v] of course.) This gives >> you a >> total of 8*32 = 256 pty devices. (Not 128 as the subjectline implies.) >> > > Actually, that is incredibly helpful. We're having problems with > expect, but when expect searches for a free pty, it only searches > [0-9a-f], which only gives us 128 ptys. There's another problem with > this search resulting in failures after 64 pty allocations which I was > trying to avoid patching in expect, but if I can get 256 processes out > of it, I'll patch away. > > Man, 5 days of searching the web and you set me straight in 48 > minutes... I should have started here first. :-) > > Thanks a *ton*! > >> (I don't think you could have more than 256 ptys back in 4.x either, but >> back then the default setup only gave you 32 ptys, and all the >> instructions I have seen for increasing that number only told how to >> let you use all 256 >> possible devices, but not more than that.) >> >> >> To get more ptys than 256 you will have to start hacking the kernel. >> (There >> does seem to be an alternate naming system for ptys available in >> 7-CURRENT >> but it has not been back-ported to 6.x. See the pty(4) manpage from >> -CURRENT for details on how it works. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 19:32:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5462716A494 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:32:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381F443CA0 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:30:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GuZCP-000450-Bo for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:51:25 -0500 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost.localnet.local [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kBDIrvOH081650 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:53:57 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id kBDIrvOo081649 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:53:57 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:53:56 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061213182324.GA7942@klentaq.com> In-Reply-To: <20061213182324.GA7942@klentaq.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612131253.57060.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec7978b25bf26dfdded6b6546b99a7ce5ddf350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Re: Missing pkg-descr - Correction X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:32:26 -0000 On Wednesday 13 December 2006 12:23, Wayne M. Barnes wrote: > Correction: This problem happened during "make all install" > for the port java/jdk15 (Not "portinstall") > > ----- Forwarded message from "Wayne M. Barnes" ----- > > Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:19:18 -0600 > From: "Wayne M. Barnes" > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Missing pkg-descr > User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i > > Dear FreeBSD, > > The following "Missing pkg-descr" is happening to me a lot, with many > packages. This time it was during "portinstall jdk15". > > ===> Installing for m4-1.4.8_1 > ===> Generating temporary packing list > ** Missing pkg-descr for m4-1.4.8_1. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/m4. > *** Error code 1 > > This time it is on a brand-new install of FreeBSD 6.2. > > How can I be responsible for the "pkg-descr". > > This is the second time I have asked this question. I got > no help before. My email was down briefly. Did I miss the answer? > > Thank you, > > -- > > Wayne M. Barnes, Ph.D., President lab at: > DNA Polymerase Technology, Inc. The Inventery > 11 Princeton Avenue 1508 S. Grand Blvd > University City, MO 63130 St. Louis, MO 63104 > > fax (314)754-9556 Phone: 314.680.0575 email: wayne@klentaq.com > > ----- End forwarded message ----- Wayne, I think you may have missed the answer. What directory are you running make from? Is it /usr/ports/java/jdk15? /usr/ports is the default location for ports, but you may get this error if you attempt to make a valid port from an invalid directory, or with invalid entries in /usr/ports/Mk or even in /etc/make.conf How are you updating your ports tree? lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 19:34:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9236E16A412 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:34:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from montreal.chapman.edu (montreal.chapman.edu [192.77.116.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C3143CC7 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:32:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from webmail.chapman.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by montreal.chapman.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id kBDJY4PH030596; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:34:04 -0800 Received: from 206.211.142.76 (SquirrelMail authenticated user chandler) by montreal.chapman.edu with HTTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:34:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <55103.206.211.142.76.1166038444.squirrel@montreal.chapman.edu> In-Reply-To: <200612131333.20652.lane@joeandlane.com> References: <20061206034909.27125.qmail@web37214.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200612081139.27993.lane@joeandlane.com> <7a4a15bd0612131112x25e1cc4mcfb85843edcf596@mail.gmail.com> <200612131333.20652.lane@joeandlane.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:34:04 -0800 (PST) From: chandler@chapman.edu To: "Lane" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 [CVS] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: Tuareg , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:34:34 -0000 > Tuareg, > > What happens when you do this: > > telnet localhost > > Does the connection time out? Or do you get a sendmail prompt? I think you mean: telnet localhost 25 Makes a bit of difference! -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 19:39:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3F816A47E for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:39:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8008743CCD for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:37:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04EB81A4D97; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:38:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 69EA45131D; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:38:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:38:38 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Ian Smith Message-ID: <20061213193838.GA57916@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-stable/All/ X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:39:07 -0000 --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 03:44:13AM +1100, Ian Smith wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > FreeBSD paqi.smithi.id.au 5.5-STABLE FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #0: Sun Nov 19 > 20:22:12 EST 2006 root@paqi.smithi.id.au:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PAQI5S_2 i3= 86 >=20 > On 4th December, after a recent portsnap fetch/update, I ran portupgrade > -anPP to prefetch all available packages for a well overdue upgrade of > all ports on this box, most dating from 5.4-RELEASE CDs >=20 > Apart from taking ~7 hours to fetch ~550MB for ~220 packages, and except > for a few non-packageable ports, that went fine. Then on 10th December, > after much study of UPDATING and adopting the procedures there for KDE, > I ran portupgrade -aPP on those packages, which apart from updating PHP4 > then installing PHP5 on top of it (which I'll take up later) went better > than I'd dared to dream, taking ~8 hours. Awesome work guys! >=20 > However after then running portsnap fetch/update to pick up anything new > since the 4th, and after upgrading portupgrade, ran another portupgrade > -anPP to pick up available packages for the ~35 ports newly out of date, > intending to finish off by building any remaining ports from sources. >=20 > I was glad I'd specified -PP .. every fetch from $subject directory > failed. Checking manually, then and again tonight, I see that indeed > only the versions of files that were (correctly) current at 4th December > are still there now. The latest file date there says 17th November. >=20 > Is this likely a temporary glitch, or do -stable packages only get > updated to match the current ports tree after some expectable delay? There's always a lag, of course (computers aren't yet infinitely fast ;-). It's usually only a lag of a couple of days for 6.x, longer for 5.x since it's a "legacy" branch and not our main focus of activity. However the main FTP distribution server has been offline with hardware failure for the past week or two, so I can't push out any of the subsequent updates. Hopefully this will be resolved soon (it's also holding up the 6.2 release cycle). Kris --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFgFa+Wry0BWjoQKURApnZAKCFqTKrtGOBzW3ckQcXIspC9mNGzgCgnRbd YiSKTWnw4DBbh8MJFBCq5vs= =VSdd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 19:40:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6225916A47B for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:40:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC9243CAF for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:37:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GuZwL-0006Tl-0Z for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:38:53 -0500 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost.localnet.local [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kBDJfTeB046351 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:41:29 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id kBDJfT6X046291 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:41:29 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:41:28 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061206034909.27125.qmail@web37214.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <7a4a15bd0612131112x25e1cc4mcfb85843edcf596@mail.gmail.com> <200612131333.20652.lane@joeandlane.com> In-Reply-To: <200612131333.20652.lane@joeandlane.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612131341.29104.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec7901e6b30c8a6723d349eeab5e020fdce1350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? (Minor correction ...) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:40:03 -0000 On Wednesday 13 December 2006 13:33, Lane wrote: > Tuareg > ... > follow > to > difficult > it > find > I > as > post > top > don't > please > > ... to say it another way ... > > please > don't > top > post, > as > I > find > it > difficult > to > follow ... > > On Wednesday 13 December 2006 13:12, Tuareg wrote: > > Hi Lane, > > > > We have tried that too.. > > > > We have the same rules that in the other servers where we can send e-mail > > without launching sendmail as daemon. > > > > Anyway we have tried disabling all the rules with: ipfw -f -q flush > > > > And listing the rules: > > > > 65535 87358 61876 allow ip from any to any > > > > > > mail -v root@localhost > > Subject: test > > test. > > . > > EOT > > root@localhost... Connecting to localhost.my.domain. via relay... > > root@localhost... Deferred: Operation timed out with localhost.my.domain. > > > > mail -v user@other.domain.com > > Subject: test > > test > > . > > EOT > > user@other.domain.com... Connecting to localhost.my.domain. via relay... > > user@other.domain.com... Deferred: Operation timed out with > > localhost.my.domain. > > > > > > Also searched about sendmail in the BSD FAQ, Handbook, if we should > > change some file in /etc/mail, but (maybe should look again?) didn't find > > anything about which file should we modify, let's say.. submit.mc? > > freebsd.submit.mc? > > > > Suggestions? > > > > Thank you for your help. > > > > On 12/8/06, Lane wrote: > > > On Friday 08 December 2006 11:16, Tuareg wrote: > > > > On 12/5/06, Lane wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday 05 December 2006 21:49, Wasp King wrote: > > > > > > is there a way that one can specify a log place to see > > > > > > daily logs like you receive from root@localhost, when > > > > > > sendmail is turned on? > > > > > > > > > > > > there must be a way to enable only local mail > > > > > > delivery...but I am not sure how.. > > > > > > > > > > > > would like to shut down sendmail but want to see > > > > > > security logs. > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > Zach > > > > > > using FreeBSD 4.2 and sendmail 8.x (maybe). > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > >__ > > > > > > > >__ IIRC, sendmail has three controlling values in /etc/rc.conf: > > > > > > > > > > sendmail_enable="YES" > > > > > sendmail_enable="NO" > > > > > and > > > > > sendmail_enable="NONE" > > > > > > > > > > The third value, "NONE," causes the boot process to ignore any > > > > > attempt > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > start sendmail. > > > > > > > > > > The second value, "NO," causes the boot process to start sendmail > > > > > for "local > > > > > delivery, only" (i.e. do NOT accept inbound connections from > > > > > external hosts). > > > > > > > > > > The first value, "YES," causes the boot process to start sendmail > > > > > for outgoing > > > > > and incoming SMTP connections. > > > > > > > > > > There are many "tweaks" that you can use in /etc/rc.conf - (refer > > > > > to /etc/defaults/rc.conf) - that will allow various flavors of > > > > > > sendmail > > > > > > > > usage. See also, /etc/rc.sendmail. > > > > > > > > > > In your case sendmail_enable="NO" should allow the local system to > > > > > send "periodic" information to root@localhost, or whatever alias > > > > > you > > > > > > use > > > > > > > > in /etc/mail/aliases, while disallowing external hosts from sending > > > > > > email > > > > > > > > by > > > > > way of the local host. Note that this requires that you pay heed > > > > > to /etc/mail/Makefile and associated README documentation > > > > > in /usr/src/contrib/sendmail and below. > > > > > > > > > > Best of luck! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lane > > > > > > > > Hi... Where I'm working, have many servers with FreeBSD 4.x and 5.x, > > > > > > this > > > > > > > servers are enable to send mail but the daemon of sendmail is not > > > > > > launched. > > > > > > > Now, we have installed FreeBSD 6.1 STABLE, but can't reply this > > > > schema. > > > > > > > > Which file needs to be modified in /etc/mail to allow the server to > > > > send emails to our real mailserver so we can receive the results of > > > > some > > > > > > scripts > > > > > > > without launching the daemon of sendmail? > > > > > > > > We have tried using sendmail="NO", in rc.conf, but we only get this > > > > messages: > > > > > > > > user@mydomain.com... Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay... > > > > user@mydomain.com... Deferred: Permission denied > > > > > > > > Thank you for your help in advance. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > Tuareg, > > > > > > Your problem is likely related to ipfw, or "firewall_type", > > > "firewall_enable" > > > in /etc/rc.conf. > > > > > > The "permission denied" error implies that your firewall ruleset is > > > preventing > > > the outgoing connection. Try: > > > > > > ipfw show > > > > > > to see your current firewall rules. > > > > > > Also read through /etc/rc.firewall and /etc/defaults/rc.conf to get > > > some more > > > information on the firewall issues. > > > > > > When you've gotten that resolved you should have enough information to > > > get sendmail working the way you want. > > > > > > lane > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Tuareg, > > What happens when you do this: > > telnet localhost Of course I mean: telnet locahost 25 :) > > Does the connection time out? Or do you get a sendmail prompt? > > I'm sort of mixed up on the order of the posts, here. But let me see if I > can rephrase the problem .... and then possibly help you find a solution > ... > > It seems to me that the problem is that you cannot determine how to make > FreeBSD 6.x do like other hosts under your influence, so that it will send > email from root@localhost to another (possibly a hub) server? Is that > correct? > > > First I assume that these other FreeBSD installations are also using > sendmail. If that is NOT correct then your best hope is to replicate your > mta configuration from those other hosts. In fact that might not be a bad > idea regardless of what they are running :) > > But again, assuming you want to run sendmail and ONLY allow the localhost > to transmit out to another host for collection and/or distribution, enter > this value into /etc/rc.conf: > > sendmail_enable="NO" > > Now edit /etc/mail/freebsd.mc. Locate the term "SMART_HOST," uncomment > that line, and enter the IP address or fully qualified domain name of your > upstream server in place of 'your.isp.mail.server' > > Note: If 'your.isp.mail.server' is NOT resolvable on the localhost, then > you must use the IP address. When you use the IP address, you must put it > in [square brackets], like [192.168.2.1]. > > Now from /etc/mail, type > > make all install > > then shutdown and restart the server using your method of choice, or just > type > > /etc/rc.d/sendmail restart > > And try to send email again. All should work now. > > But you must remember to configure the TARGET mail server to allow this > host to send. I'll leave that as an exercise for you. > > lane > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 19:59:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7E416A514 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:59:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@mkproductions.org) Received: from server1.tntpowerhost.com (server1.tntpowerhost.com [208.100.3.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12FA043E88 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:50:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@mkproductions.org) Received: from ppp-70-248-222-106.dsl.spfdmo.swbell.net ([70.248.222.106] helo=localhost) by server1.tntpowerhost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Gua8y-0008hg-PA; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:51:56 -0600 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:51:50 -0600 From: Mark Kane To: Olivier Regnier Message-ID: <20061213135150.335c8af1@localhost> In-Reply-To: <457FE1D4.6050007@ixsys.org> References: <457FE1D4.6050007@ixsys.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.6.1cvs28 (GTK+ 2.10.6; x86_64-unknown-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=MP_wwbcfZXwBKSU0VAAwwXXfX. X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.tntpowerhost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - mkproductions.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mpg123 with shoutcast radio X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:59:04 -0000 --MP_wwbcfZXwBKSU0VAAwwXXfX. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Dec 13, 2006, at 12:19:48 +0100, Olivier Regnier wrote: > Hello, > > mpg123 is a relatively simple program but doesn't work with .pls file. > > I used this command: > > % mpg123 -@ > "http://www.shoutcast.com/sbin/shoutcast-playlist.pls?rn=5761&file=filename.pls" > > but i have this message: > > > HTTP request failed: 404 Not Found > > My pf firewall and proxy are disabled but anytime, i have the same > thing. Estrange no ? > > Can you help me please ? Hi. mpg123 doesn't support pls files by itself. I have attached a real simple script that can help make this easier. Just chmod +x it, and then do: ./mpg123_pls.sh "http://your.url.com/file.pls" It would probably be good to make a shell alias to the script for easier usage. -Mark -- Internet Radio: Party107 (Trance/Electronic) - http://www.party107.com Rock 101.9 The Edge (Rock) - http://www.rock1019.net IRC: MIXXnet IRC Network - irc.mixxnet.net (Nick: MIXX941) --MP_wwbcfZXwBKSU0VAAwwXXfX. Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=mpg123_pls.sh Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=mpg123_pls.sh IyEvYmluL3NoCgplbnYgZmV0Y2ggLXEgLW8gLSAkMSB8IGdyZXAgLWUgJ0ZpbGUxJyB8IGhlYWQg LW4gMSB8IGN1dCAtZiAyIC1kID0gfCB4YXJncyBtcGcxMjMK --MP_wwbcfZXwBKSU0VAAwwXXfX.-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 20:27:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B377316A526 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:27:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57BDE43D1D for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:25:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.4) with SMTP id HAA24208; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:26:43 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:26:42 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20061213193838.GA57916@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-stable/All/ X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:27:32 -0000 On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 03:44:13AM +1100, Ian Smith wrote: [..] > > I was glad I'd specified -PP .. every fetch from $subject directory > > failed. Checking manually, then and again tonight, I see that indeed > > only the versions of files that were (correctly) current at 4th December > > are still there now. The latest file date there says 17th November. > > > > Is this likely a temporary glitch, or do -stable packages only get > > updated to match the current ports tree after some expectable delay? > There's always a lag, of course (computers aren't yet infinitely fast > ;-). It's usually only a lag of a couple of days for 6.x, longer for > 5.x since it's a "legacy" branch and not our main focus of activity. As we're often enough reminded :) Thought I'd get it all up to date, then cvsup to 6.2 once released. > However the main FTP distribution server has been offline with > hardware failure for the past week or two, so I can't push out any of > the subsequent updates. Hopefully this will be resolved soon (it's > also holding up the 6.2 release cycle). Thanks Kris, may it Get Well Soon. BTW, just to try, I'd installed 6.1-R on another box over the net from the boot-only CD, and enjoyed being able to install heaps of packages from sysinstall that way, but was a bit dismayed to find it hadn't kept the fetched packages .. is there a way to ask sysinstall to do that? Cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 20:27:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85ABC16A510 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:27:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from stargate.alaskaparadise.com (114-103-74-65.gci.net [65.74.103.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B5E43CD5 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:25:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: by stargate.alaskaparadise.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id D8F4245D5; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:27:08 -0900 (AKST) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: Alaska Paradise Travel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:26:52 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3664024.BU2iTllgcc"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200612131127.07238.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Subject: Shar question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:27:33 -0000 --nextPart3664024.BU2iTllgcc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I'm trying to learn how to use shar. I've read the manual. If I pass a directory to shar: shar foo > foo.shar Results in a shar file. Problem is that when I unpack it I just end up with= an=20 empty directory. I probably need to pass it a flag or something, but I'm no= t=20 sure which one to use. How do I make a shar file out of a directory and ALL it's contents. TIA Beech =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart3664024.BU2iTllgcc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFgGIap5D0B1NlT4URAgpfAJ44REbieoKJ4GZUTFqTnf1GpQnGXACfStMt 6bXixl6R0SyrXXBNFuHzrHw= =t8fn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3664024.BU2iTllgcc-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 20:30:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE3B16A412 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:30:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: from shell.dhp.com (shell.dhp.com [199.4.150.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC61A43CCD for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:28:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: by shell.dhp.com (Postfix, from userid 896) id 6F89A263D4; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:30:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:30:04 -0500 (EST) From: Ensel Sharon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: can I unload a module from within sysinstall ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:30:26 -0000 I need to load a new kernel module during sysinstall so that I can see my raid controller. Easy - I go into configure, load, and load it off the floppy. Easy. BUT, freebsd already has a xyz.ko, and it is already loaded, so it fails. So my question is, how do I unload the existing xyz.ko before I load the new one ? Can I do it in sysinstall ? Can I do it in the loader prompt prior to sysinstall ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 20:32:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B788716A519 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:32:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4769243DA7 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:30:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i28so152171wra for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:31:46 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=KyWzAul3eM+DhQ9gDZdWJs3HFtXElLE4vKxM0cfdiihvsxS8/sfxBthwoGDPI6SXaJSuUllZiyzMEf/nlZDPIAc+pSa0Vi7RYrCCSf5amn2JerdWwJa1FSeoDL8FjGNkFqUX9iq1cWMCZg/PAOaSwBmdnIvU9YvcqhPpdnLwPKQ= Received: by 10.78.204.1 with SMTP id b1mr975429hug.1166041905693; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:31:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.161.19 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:31:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7a4a15bd0612131231q3fd8e9eat198da67d41cbef48@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:31:45 -0600 From: Tuareg To: Lane In-Reply-To: <200612131333.20652.lane@joeandlane.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061206034909.27125.qmail@web37214.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200612081139.27993.lane@joeandlane.com> <7a4a15bd0612131112x25e1cc4mcfb85843edcf596@mail.gmail.com> <200612131333.20652.lane@joeandlane.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:32:26 -0000 On 12/13/06, Lane wrote: > > Tuareg, > > What happens when you do this: > > telnet localhost telnet localhost 25 Trying 127.0.0.1... telnet: connect to address 127.0.0.1: Operation timed out telnet: Unable to connect to remote host Does the connection time out? Or do you get a sendmail prompt? Yes, the connection time out. No, I don't get the sendmail prompt, because there is no sendmail running. ps axwww | grep sendmail 47237 p0 R+ 0:00.00 grep sendmail I'm sort of mixed up on the order of the posts, here. But let me see if I > can > rephrase the problem .... and then possibly help you find a solution ... > > It seems to me that the problem is that you cannot determine how to make > FreeBSD 6.x do like other hosts under your influence, so that it will send > email from root@localhost to another (possibly a hub) server? Is that > correct? Yes, we have older versions of FreeBSD (4.x and 5.x) running on remote servers where we can't interrupt the service, in this servers, we can send e-mails to our main e-mail server, were we get reports of scripts. In those servers, we don't have running sendmail, look: ps axwww | grep sendmail 19702 p0 D+ 0:00.00 grep sendmail % %telnet localhost 25 Trying 127.0.0.1... telnet: connect to address 127.0.0.1: Permission denied telnet: Unable to connect to remote host But, we are able to send emails: mail -v user@main.server.com Subject: Test Testing from FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE . EOT user@main.server.com... Connecting to main.server.com via esmtp... 220 main.server.com ESMTP >>> EHLO server.FreeBSD.4.6-RELEASE 250-main.server.com Hello 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 31457280 250-ETRN 250-DSN 250 PIPELINING >>> MAIL From: SIZE=78 250 Sender OK >>> RCPT To: 250 Recipient OK >>> DATA 354 Enter your message, followed by a dot on a line by itself >>> . 250 AYQ81844 Message accepted for delivery user@main.server.com... Sent (AYQ81844 Message accepted for delivery) Closing connection to main.server.com >>> QUIT 221 main.server.com Goodbye First I assume that these other FreeBSD installations are also using > sendmail. > If that is NOT correct then your best hope is to replicate your mta > configuration from those other hosts. In fact that might not be a bad > idea > regardless of what they are running :) You are right, all this installations are also using sendmail. But again, assuming you want to run sendmail and ONLY allow the localhost to > transmit out to another host for collection and/or distribution, enter > this > value into /etc/rc.conf: > > sendmail_enable="NO" > > Now edit /etc/mail/freebsd.mc. Locate the term "SMART_HOST," uncomment > that > line, and enter the IP address or fully qualified domain name of your > upstream server in place of 'your.isp.mail.server' > > Note: If 'your.isp.mail.server' is NOT resolvable on the localhost, then > you > must use the IP address. When you use the IP address, you must put it in > [square brackets], like [192.168.2.1]. > > Now from /etc/mail, type > > make all install > > then shutdown and restart the server using your method of choice, or just > type > > /etc/rc.d/sendmail restart > > And try to send email again. All should work now. > > But you must remember to configure the TARGET mail server to allow this > host > to send. I'll leave that as an exercise for you. > > lane Have some doubts... about this procedure.. I'm going to explain why.... In this server (from the example, server.FreeBSD.4.6-RELEASE, where we can send e-mail, but sendmail it's not running, rc.conf contains: sendmail_enable="NONE", sendmail it's not running: ps axwww | grep sendmail 19702 p0 D+ 0:00.00 grep sendmail And how I showed you in this messages, we are able to send messages, well.. root can do it, as a normal user I can't: mail -v user@main.server.com Subject: TEST Testing from FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE . EOT collect: Cannot write ./dfkBDJDkW19705 (bfcommit, uid=xxx): Permission denied queueup: cannot create queue temp file ./tfkBDJDkW19705, uid=xxx: Permission denied The older sysadmin who made this configuration with FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE, quit the job and didn't leave any documentation, a how to, nothing, were he explain how he did this. That's the reason why we are looking to repeat this configuration with FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE, but couldn't do it.. yet. Thank you for your help. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 20:36:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75E0116A403 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bean@linuxmail.org) Received: from webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485B243CBB for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:34:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bean@linuxmail.org) Received: from unknown (unknown [192.168.9.180]) by webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with QMQP id 1B08D1800DF1 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:36:09 +0000 (GMT) X-OB-Received: from unknown (205.158.62.131) by wfilter.us4.outblaze.com; 13 Dec 2006 20:36:08 -0000 Received: by ws5-1.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EA69A43DEE; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:36:08 +0000 (GMT) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_----------=_1166042168132250" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "brian merrell" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 04:36:08 +0800 Received: from [151.155.224.83] by ws5-1.us4.outblaze.com with http for bean@linuxmail.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 04:36:08 +0800 X-Originating-Ip: 151.155.224.83 X-Originating-Server: ws5-1.us4.outblaze.com Message-Id: <20061213203608.EA69A43DEE@ws5-1.us4.outblaze.com> Subject: javaws X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:36:09 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --_----------=_1166042168132250 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I've been googleing all morning on this one... I'm need to get javaws to work. I am using FreeBSD6.1-RELEASE amd64. I've tried installing the diablo packages (both jdk and jre), and=20 apparently it does not include javaws, is this correct? I've tried installing the linux-sun-jdk15 package. It installed=20 okay, but javaws is broken: " [root@cobweb /usr/ports/java/linux-sun-jdk15]# javaws Java Web Start splash screen process exiting ... Bad installation: JAVAWS_HOME not set: No such file or directory " And I've tried compiling /usr/ports/java/jdk15 and it fails: # # SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=3D0xffffefd4, pid=3D28699, tid=3D49156 # # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.4.2_12-b03 mixed mode) # Problematic frame: # C 0xffffefd4 # # An error report file with more information is saved as hs_err_pid28699.log # # If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit: # http://java.sun.com/webapps/bugreport/crash.jsp Any pointers or ideas? javaws is a necessity for me. Thanks, Brian. I have attached hs_err_pid28699.log --=20 _______________________________________________ Get your free email from http://www.linuxmail.org Powered by Outblaze --_----------=_1166042168132250 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="hs_err_pid28699.log" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="hs_err_pid28699.log" IwojIEFuIHVuZXhwZWN0ZWQgZXJyb3IgaGFzIGJlZW4gZGV0ZWN0ZWQgYnkg SG90U3BvdCBWaXJ0dWFsIE1hY2hpbmU6CiMKIyAgU0lHU0VHViAoMHhiKSBh dCBwYz0weGZmZmZlZmQ0LCBwaWQ9Mjg2OTksIHRpZD00OTE1NgojCiMgSmF2 YSBWTTogSmF2YSBIb3RTcG90KFRNKSBDbGllbnQgVk0gKDEuNC4yXzEyLWIw MyBtaXhlZCBtb2RlKQojIFByb2JsZW1hdGljIGZyYW1lOgojIEMgIDB4ZmZm ZmVmZDQKIwoKLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tICBUIEggUiBFIEEgRCAgLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tCgpDdXJyZW50IHRocmVhZCAoMHgwODA5MjA5OCk6ICBKYXZh VGhyZWFkICJGaW5hbGl6ZXIiIGRhZW1vbiBbX3RocmVhZF9ibG9ja2VkX3Ry YW5zLCBpZD0yODcwM10KCnNpZ2luZm86c2lfc2lnbm89MTEsIHNpX2Vycm5v PTAsIHNpX2NvZGU9MTY0MTQsIHNpX2FkZHI9MHgwMDAwNDAwMAoKUmVnaXN0 ZXJzOgpFQVg9MHhmZjNmZmQ5YywgRUJYPTB4ZmYzZmY0MTgsIEVDWD0weDAw MDAwMDAwLCBFRFg9MHgwMDAwMDAwOQpFU1A9MHhmZjNmZjM4YywgRUJQPTB4 ZmYzZmY0OTAsIEVTST0weDI4MDgyMWI4LCBFREk9MHhmZjNmZjRiNApFSVA9 MHhmZmZmZWZkNCwgQ1IyPTB4MDAwMDAwMDAsIEVGTEFHUz0weDAwMDEwMjQ2 CgpUb3Agb2YgU3RhY2s6IChzcD0weGZmM2ZmMzhjKQoweGZmM2ZmMzhjOiAg IDAwMDAwMDBjIGZmM2ZmMzk4IGZmM2ZmNDE4IDAwMDAwMDBjCjB4ZmYzZmYz OWM6ICAgMDAwMDAwMDAgMDAwMDAwMDAgMDAwMDAwMDIgMDAwMDAwMDAKMHhm ZjNmZjNhYzogICAwMDAwMDAwMCAwMDAwMDAwMCAwMDAwMDAwMCAwMDAwMDAw MAoweGZmM2ZmM2JjOiAgIDAwMDAwMDAwIDAwMDAwMDAwIDAwMDAwMDAwIDAw MDAwMDAwCjB4ZmYzZmYzY2M6ICAgMDAwMDAwMDAgMDAwMDAwMDAgMDAwMDAw MDAgMDAwMDAwMDAKMHhmZjNmZjNkYzogICAwMDAwMDAwMCAwMDAwMDAwMCAw MDAwMDAwMCAwMDAwMDAwMAoweGZmM2ZmM2VjOiAgIDAwMDAwMDAwIDAwMDAw MDAwIDAwMDAwMDAwIDAwMDAwMDAwCjB4ZmYzZmYzZmM6ICAgMDAwMDAwMDAg MDAwMDAwMDAgMDAwMDAwMDAgMDAwMDAwMDAgCgpJbnN0cnVjdGlvbnM6IChw Yz0weGZmZmZlZmQ0KQoweGZmZmZlZmM0OiAgIDAxIDAwIDAwIDhkIDljIDI0 IDhjIDAwIDAwIDAwIDhlIDZiIDAwIDhlIDYzIDA0CjB4ZmZmZmVmZDQ6ICAg OGUgNDMgMDggOGUgNWIgMGMgNTAgYjggYWQgMDAgMDAgMDAgY2QgODAgZWIg ZmUgCgpTdGFjazogWzB4ZmYzOGUwMDAsMHhmZjQwMDAwMCksICBzcD0weGZm M2ZmMzhjLCAgZnJlZSBzcGFjZT00NTJrCk5hdGl2ZSBmcmFtZXM6IChKPWNv bXBpbGVkIEphdmEgY29kZSwgaj1pbnRlcnByZXRlZCwgVnY9Vk0gY29kZSwg Qz1uYXRpdmUgY29kZSkKQyAgMHhmZmZmZWZkNApDICBbbGlicHRocmVhZC5z by4wKzB4NzhlOV0KQyAgW2xpYnB0aHJlYWQuc28uMCsweGE2ZmRdCkMgIFts aWJwdGhyZWFkLnNvLjArMHg3MThlXSAgX19wdGhyZWFkX211dGV4X2xvY2sr MHgxMjIKViAgW2xpYmp2bS5zbysweDI2MzQ2Yl0KViAgW2xpYmp2bS5zbysw eDI1MzQ1OF0KViAgW2xpYmp2bS5zbysweDI4MmViZV0KViAgW2xpYmp2bS5z bysweDI1YzU5MV0KViAgW2xpYmp2bS5zbysweDI1ZDk1Yl0KViAgW2xpYmp2 bS5zbysweDI5M2ExN10KViAgW2xpYmp2bS5zbysweDFhNTVhYV0KaiAgamF2 YS5sYW5nLnJlZi5GaW5hbGl6ZXIucnVuRmluYWxpemVyKClWKzQKaiAgamF2 YS5sYW5nLnJlZi5GaW5hbGl6ZXIuYWNjZXNzJDEwMChMamF2YS9sYW5nL3Jl Zi9GaW5hbGl6ZXI7KVYrMQpqICBqYXZhLmxhbmcucmVmLkZpbmFsaXplciRG aW5hbGl6ZXJUaHJlYWQucnVuKClWKzExCnYgIH5TdHViUm91dGluZXM6OmNh bGxfc3R1YgpWICBbbGlianZtLnNvKzB4MWFlODg0XQpWICBbbGlianZtLnNv KzB4MjYzZTA5XQpWICBbbGlianZtLnNvKzB4MWFlYWQ2XQpWICBbbGlianZt LnNvKzB4MWFlM2E2XQpWICBbbGlianZtLnNvKzB4MWFlZjFmXQpWICBbbGli anZtLnNvKzB4MjA4Y2Y1XQpWICBbbGlianZtLnNvKzB4MmIwNTRhXQpWICBb bGlianZtLnNvKzB4MmFiODc3XQpWICBbbGlianZtLnNvKzB4MjY1OGUzXQpD ICBbbGlicHRocmVhZC5zby4wKzB4NWI4YV0KCkphdmEgZnJhbWVzOiAoSj1j b21waWxlZCBKYXZhIGNvZGUsIGo9aW50ZXJwcmV0ZWQsIFZ2PVZNIGNvZGUp CmogIGphdmEubGFuZy5yZWYuRmluYWxpemVyLnJ1bkZpbmFsaXplcigpVis0 CmogIGphdmEubGFuZy5yZWYuRmluYWxpemVyLmFjY2VzcyQxMDAoTGphdmEv bGFuZy9yZWYvRmluYWxpemVyOylWKzEKaiAgamF2YS5sYW5nLnJlZi5GaW5h bGl6ZXIkRmluYWxpemVyVGhyZWFkLnJ1bigpVisxMQp2ICB+U3R1YlJvdXRp bmVzOjpjYWxsX3N0dWIKCi0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLSAgUCBSIE8gQyBFIFMg UyAgLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tCgpKYXZhIFRocmVhZHM6ICggPT4gY3VycmVu dCB0aHJlYWQgKQogIDB4MDgwOTYxMjAgSmF2YVRocmVhZCAiQ29tcGlsZXJU aHJlYWQwIiBkYWVtb24gW190aHJlYWRfYmxvY2tlZCwgaWQ9Mjg3MDZdCiAg MHgwODA5NTM0OCBKYXZhVGhyZWFkICJTaWduYWwgRGlzcGF0Y2hlciIgZGFl bW9uIFtfdGhyZWFkX2Jsb2NrZWQsIGlkPTI4NzA1XQo9PjB4MDgwOTIwOTgg SmF2YVRocmVhZCAiRmluYWxpemVyIiBkYWVtb24gW190aHJlYWRfYmxvY2tl ZF90cmFucywgaWQ9Mjg3MDNdCiAgMHgwODA5MDY1OCBKYXZhVGhyZWFkICJS ZWZlcmVuY2UgSGFuZGxlciIgZGFlbW9uIFtfdGhyZWFkX2Jsb2NrZWQsIGlk PTI4NzAyXQogIDB4MDgwNThiMjggSmF2YVRocmVhZCAibWFpbiIgW190aHJl YWRfYmxvY2tlZCwgaWQ9Mjg2OTldCgpPdGhlciBUaHJlYWRzOgogIDB4MDgw OGQ0YTggVk1UaHJlYWQgW2lkPTI4NzAxXQogIDB4MDgwOTdhOTAgV2F0Y2hl clRocmVhZCBbaWQ9Mjg3MDddCgpWTSBzdGF0ZTpub3QgYXQgc2FmZXBvaW50 IChub3JtYWwgZXhlY3V0aW9uKQoKVk0gTXV0ZXgvTW9uaXRvciBjdXJyZW50 bHkgb3duZWQgYnkgYSB0aHJlYWQ6ICAoW211dGV4L2xvY2tfZXZlbnRdKQpb MHgwODA1ODJkOC8weDA4MDU4MzA4XSBTYWZlcG9pbnRfbG9jayAtIG93bmVy IHRocmVhZDogMHgwODA4ZDRhOApbMHgwODA1ODMzOC8weDA4MDU4MzY4XSBU aHJlYWRzX2xvY2sgLSBvd25lciB0aHJlYWQ6IDB4MDgwOGQ0YTgKWzB4MDgw NTg2NjgvMHgwODA1ODY4OF0gSGVhcF9sb2NrIC0gb3duZXIgdGhyZWFkOiAw eDA4MDU4YjI4CgpIZWFwCiBkZWYgbmV3IGdlbmVyYXRpb24gICB0b3RhbCA1 NzZLLCB1c2VkIDEwSyBbMHgyYzg0MDAwMCwgMHgyYzhlMDAwMCwgMHgyY2Qy MDAwMCkKICBlZGVuIHNwYWNlIDUxMkssICAgMCUgdXNlZCBbMHgyYzg0MDAw MCwgMHgyYzg0MDA0MCwgMHgyYzhjMDAwMCkKICBmcm9tIHNwYWNlIDY0Sywg IDE2JSB1c2VkIFsweDJjOGQwMDAwLCAweDJjOGQyYTQ4LCAweDJjOGUwMDAw KQogIHRvICAgc3BhY2UgNjRLLCAgIDAlIHVzZWQgWzB4MmM4YzAwMDAsIDB4 MmM4YzAwMDAsIDB4MmM4ZDAwMDApCiB0ZW51cmVkIGdlbmVyYXRpb24gICB0 b3RhbCAxNDA4SywgdXNlZCA3OTlLIFsweDJjZDIwMDAwLCAweDJjZTgwMDAw LCAweDMwODQwMDAwKQogICB0aGUgc3BhY2UgMTQwOEssICA1NiUgdXNlZCBb MHgyY2QyMDAwMCwgMHgyY2RlN2ZmOCwgMHgyY2RlODAwMCwgMHgyY2U4MDAw MCkKIGNvbXBhY3RpbmcgcGVybSBnZW4gIHRvdGFsIDQwOTZLLCB1c2VkIDEx MjBLIFsweDMwODQwMDAwLCAweDMwYzQwMDAwLCAweDM0ODQwMDAwKQogICB0 aGUgc3BhY2UgNDA5NkssICAyNyUgdXNlZCBbMHgzMDg0MDAwMCwgMHgzMDk1 ODJhMCwgMHgzMDk1ODQwMCwgMHgzMGM0MDAwMCkKCkR5bmFtaWMgbGlicmFy aWVzOgpDYW4gbm90IGdldCBsaWJyYXJ5IGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIGZvciBwaWQg PSAyODcwMwoKVk0gQXJndW1lbnRzOgpqYXZhX2NvbW1hbmQ6IE1ha2VEZXBz IGRpZmZzIFVuaXhQbGF0Zm9ybSBwbGF0Zm9ybS5jdXJyZW50IGluY2x1ZGVE Qi5jdXJyZW50IC91c3IvcG9ydHMvamF2YS9qZGsxNS93b3JrL2hvdHNwb3Qv YnVpbGQvYnNkL3BsYXRmb3JtX2FtZDY0IGluY2x1ZGVEQgpMYXVuY2hlciBU eXBlOiBTVU5fU1RBTkRBUkQKCkVudmlyb25tZW50IFZhcmlhYmxlczoKSkFW QV9IT01FPQpDTEFTU1BBVEg9ClBBVEg9L3NiaW46L2JpbjovdXNyL3NiaW46 L3Vzci9iaW46L3Vzci9nYW1lczovdXNyL2xvY2FsL3NiaW46L3Vzci9sb2Nh bC9iaW46L3Vzci9YMTFSNi9iaW46L2hvbWUvYmVhbi9iaW4KTERfTElCUkFS WV9QQVRIPS91c3IvbG9jYWwvbGludXgtc3VuLWpkazEuNC4yL2pyZS9saWIv aTM4Ni9jbGllbnQ6L3Vzci9sb2NhbC9saW51eC1zdW4tamRrMS40LjIvanJl L2xpYi9pMzg2Oi91c3IvbG9jYWwvbGludXgtc3VuLWpkazEuNC4yL2pyZS8u Li9saWIvaTM4NjoKU0hFTEw9L2Jpbi9zaApESVNQTEFZPTowLjAKQVJDSD1h bWQ2NAoKCi0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLSAgUyBZIFMgVCBFIE0gIC0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLQoKT1M6RmVkb3JhIENvcmUgcmVsZWFzZSA0IChTdGVudHopCgp1 bmFtZTpMaW51eCAyLjQuMiBGcmVlQlNEIDYuMS1SRUxFQVNFICMwOiBTdW4g TWF5ICA3IDA0OjE1OjU3IFVUQyAyMDA2IGk2ODYKbGliYzpnbGliYyAyLjMu NiBsaW51eHRocmVhZHMtMC4xMCAoZmxvYXRpbmcgc3RhY2spCnJsaW1pdDog U1RBQ0sgMjA0NGssIENPUkUgaW5maW5pdHksIE5QUk9DIDU1NDcsIE5PRklM RSAxMTA5NSwgQVMgMTBrCmxvYWQgYXZlcmFnZToyMzA1MzcxODc1MTkzNTA3 LjAwIDM2ODIyMTE3MzczNzQxODAwMjY2NDcyODczOTQ0NjUyMzExNDQzMjI5 NjUxMTExNjE3MTM2OTUwMzgxMjg3MjAxMzU1MjEwMzIzNDI4ODI2ODk4MzY5 NzEwMjA4MDA0NzcxNTEwMTgzMDUxNzczOTU5NDAzNjY2MzE4MjE2NDM4NzAy NTAzMDE4NTU2OTM3MTU1Mjc4NTA5NjY3ODM3MDMzNTUzODYyODczNjIxMTI3 NDk1NjguMDAgMzkzMTYwOTA1MzA0MzM2NjEzMzc3MDM4NTgzMDAwNTYyMjk3 NDA2NDEyNTQ3MzAxMjE3OTA2NjI2MDkwMTIxNzM0NzQ5NjU1NTQzMDM2Nzc5 MTM1NzY2NjI2MzA0LjAwCgpDUFU6dG90YWwgMSBmYW1pbHkgMTUsIGNtb3Ys IGN4OCwgZnhzciwgbW14LCBzc2UsIHNzZTIKCk1lbW9yeTogNGsgcGFnZSwg cGh5c2ljYWwgMzM4NzM0NGsoMzE5NTMwNGsgZnJlZSksIHN3YXAgMGsoMGsg ZnJlZSkKCnZtX2luZm86IEphdmEgSG90U3BvdChUTSkgQ2xpZW50IFZNICgx LjQuMl8xMi1iMDMpIGZvciBsaW51eC14ODYsIGJ1aWx0IG9uIE1heSAgOSAy MDA2IDEyOjQ4OjU1IGJ5IHVua25vd24gd2l0aCB1bmtub3duIGNvbXBpbGVy Cgo= --_----------=_1166042168132250-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 20:38:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714CC16A492 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:38:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1176A43CA3 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:36:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:38:27 -0500 id 00056407.458064C3.00011F72 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:38:26 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: Beech Rintoul Message-Id: <20061213153826.ddff57be.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <200612131127.07238.beech@alaskaparadise.com> References: <200612131127.07238.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shar question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:38:28 -0000 In response to Beech Rintoul : > I'm trying to learn how to use shar. I've read the manual. > > If I pass a directory to shar: > > shar foo > foo.shar > > Results in a shar file. Problem is that when I unpack it I just end up with an > empty directory. I probably need to pass it a flag or something, but I'm not > sure which one to use. > > How do I make a shar file out of a directory and ALL it's contents. shar needs to know all the files it's to put into the archive, it doesn't walk the tree for you. Thus you could do: share file1.txt file2.txt file3.txt > archive.shar to selectively grab only the specified files. When grabbing an entire directory tree, you can use the syntax: share `find \start\of\directory\tree -print` > archive.shar which is hinted at in the man page. The backticks cause the find command to be executed, and the output of find is given to shar. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 20:44:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E99816A407 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:44:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B754E43C9F for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:43:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GuayC-0001Qc-PM for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:44:53 -0500 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost.localnet.local [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kBDKlSHk052857 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:47:28 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id kBDKlSTq052856 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:47:28 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:47:27 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061206034909.27125.qmail@web37214.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200612131333.20652.lane@joeandlane.com> <7a4a15bd0612131231q3fd8e9eat198da67d41cbef48@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7a4a15bd0612131231q3fd8e9eat198da67d41cbef48@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612131447.28141.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec7989e2038e6fd22abbdcad69cbb0f9e9c7350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:44:54 -0000 On Wednesday 13 December 2006 14:31, Tuareg wrote: > On 12/13/06, Lane wrote: > > Tuareg, > > > > What happens when you do this: > > > > telnet localhost > > telnet localhost 25 > Trying 127.0.0.1... > telnet: connect to address 127.0.0.1: Operation timed out > telnet: Unable to connect to remote host > > > Does the connection time out? Or do you get a sendmail prompt? > > > Yes, the connection time out. > No, I don't get the sendmail prompt, because there is no sendmail running. > > ps axwww | grep sendmail > 47237 p0 R+ 0:00.00 grep sendmail > > > I'm sort of mixed up on the order of the posts, here. But let me see if I > > > can > > rephrase the problem .... and then possibly help you find a solution ... > > > > It seems to me that the problem is that you cannot determine how to make > > FreeBSD 6.x do like other hosts under your influence, so that it will > > send email from root@localhost to another (possibly a hub) server? Is > > that correct? > > Yes, we have older versions of FreeBSD (4.x and 5.x) running on remote > servers > where we can't interrupt the service, in this servers, we can send e-mails > to our > main e-mail server, were we get reports of scripts. > > In those servers, we don't have running sendmail, look: > > ps axwww | grep sendmail > 19702 p0 D+ 0:00.00 grep sendmail > % > %telnet localhost 25 > Trying 127.0.0.1... > telnet: connect to address 127.0.0.1: Permission denied > telnet: Unable to connect to remote host > > But, we are able to send emails: > > mail -v user@main.server.com > Subject: Test > Testing from FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE > . > EOT > user@main.server.com... Connecting to main.server.com via esmtp... > 220 main.server.com ESMTP > > >>> EHLO server.FreeBSD.4.6-RELEASE > > 250-main.server.com Hello > 250-8BITMIME > 250-SIZE 31457280 > 250-ETRN > 250-DSN > 250 PIPELINING > > >>> MAIL From: SIZE=78 > > 250 Sender OK > > >>> RCPT To: > > 250 Recipient OK > > >>> DATA > > 354 Enter your message, followed by a dot on a line by itself > > >>> . > > 250 AYQ81844 Message accepted for delivery > user@main.server.com... Sent (AYQ81844 Message accepted for delivery) > Closing connection to main.server.com > > >>> QUIT > > 221 main.server.com Goodbye > > > First I assume that these other FreeBSD installations are also using > > > sendmail. > > If that is NOT correct then your best hope is to replicate your mta > > configuration from those other hosts. In fact that might not be a bad > > idea > > regardless of what they are running :) > > You are right, all this installations are also using sendmail. > > But again, assuming you want to run sendmail and ONLY allow the localhost > to > > > transmit out to another host for collection and/or distribution, enter > > this > > value into /etc/rc.conf: > > > > sendmail_enable="NO" > > > > Now edit /etc/mail/freebsd.mc. Locate the term "SMART_HOST," uncomment > > that > > line, and enter the IP address or fully qualified domain name of your > > upstream server in place of 'your.isp.mail.server' > > > > Note: If 'your.isp.mail.server' is NOT resolvable on the localhost, then > > you > > must use the IP address. When you use the IP address, you must put it in > > [square brackets], like [192.168.2.1]. > > > > Now from /etc/mail, type > > > > make all install > > > > then shutdown and restart the server using your method of choice, or just > > type > > > > /etc/rc.d/sendmail restart > > > > And try to send email again. All should work now. > > > > But you must remember to configure the TARGET mail server to allow this > > host > > to send. I'll leave that as an exercise for you. > > > > lane > > Have some doubts... about this procedure.. I'm going to explain why.... > > In this server (from the example, server.FreeBSD.4.6-RELEASE, where we can > send e-mail, but sendmail it's not running, rc.conf contains: > sendmail_enable="NONE", sendmail it's not running: > > ps axwww | grep sendmail > 19702 p0 D+ 0:00.00 grep sendmail > > And how I showed you in this messages, we are able to send messages, well.. > root can do it, as a normal user I can't: > > mail -v user@main.server.com > Subject: TEST > Testing from FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE > . > EOT > collect: Cannot write ./dfkBDJDkW19705 (bfcommit, uid=xxx): Permission > denied > queueup: cannot create queue temp file ./tfkBDJDkW19705, uid=xxx: > Permission denied > > The older sysadmin who made this configuration with FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE, > quit the job and didn't leave any documentation, a how to, nothing, were he > explain how he did this. > > That's the reason why we are looking to repeat this configuration with > FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE, but couldn't do it.. yet. > > Thank you for your help. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Tuareg, Post /etc/rc.conf from one of the servers that does what you want and that should lead us to what mta is handling email. Also, please post a copy of ls -al /usr/local/etc/rc.d from that same working server, just in case there is a custom script starting the mta. lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 20:46:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5B916A403 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:46:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from stargate.alaskaparadise.com (114-103-74-65.gci.net [65.74.103.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D39043C9E for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:45:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: by stargate.alaskaparadise.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 4BBB845D5; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:46:34 -0900 (AKST) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: Alaska Paradise Travel To: Bill Moran Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:46:30 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200612131127.07238.beech@alaskaparadise.com> <20061213153826.ddff57be.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20061213153826.ddff57be.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3017683.VXOCursPjo"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200612131146.32653.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shar question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:46:36 -0000 --nextPart3017683.VXOCursPjo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 13 December 2006 11:38, Bill Moran wrote: > In response to Beech Rintoul : > > I'm trying to learn how to use shar. I've read the manual. > > > > If I pass a directory to shar: > > > > shar foo > foo.shar > > > > Results in a shar file. Problem is that when I unpack it I just end up > > with an empty directory. I probably need to pass it a flag or something, > > but I'm not sure which one to use. > > > > How do I make a shar file out of a directory and ALL it's contents. > > shar needs to know all the files it's to put into the archive, it > doesn't walk the tree for you. > > Thus you could do: > share file1.txt file2.txt file3.txt > archive.shar > to selectively grab only the specified files. > > When grabbing an entire directory tree, you can use the syntax: > share `find \start\of\directory\tree -print` > archive.shar > > which is hinted at in the man page. The backticks cause the find > command to be executed, and the output of find is given to shar. OK, now I understand. The manual was a bit unclear on that. Thanks, Beech =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart3017683.VXOCursPjo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFgGaop5D0B1NlT4URAi1bAJ9JDyyXGl5FnlcCImj6h9Uu29A4jgCghbZN hCbTH0Ch0crTwegZaT5rNvc= =G9BD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3017683.VXOCursPjo-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 20:50:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A5616A416 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:50:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6078D43CD0 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:48:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so150954nzh for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:50:15 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=MKzopECze/hVfdQKM7f0SbKSKD4HZETq8YOhTzN0Oz9GQEv04T9x92phZDSxFS9AuwzWkT/CFyPzVyNtKSVAfOjHt0P9K8XN3C3NfiqHOFPcxD/npNs1rs58ffYpDwP/U8vUfDfXAi9FNnwGGBL5PFHiK3JFM7NhH9UoDiGAdCw= Received: by 10.65.154.10 with SMTP id g10mr2129188qbo.1166043015272; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:50:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.75.14 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:50:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <17489c7a0612131250u753c149cv11a98a67bea9b8b0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:50:15 -0500 From: "Chad Gross" To: "Ensel Sharon" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can I unload a module from within sysinstall ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:50:26 -0000 On 12/13/06, Ensel Sharon wrote: > > > I need to load a new kernel module during sysinstall so that I can see my > raid controller. > > Easy - I go into configure, load, and load it off the floppy. Easy. > > BUT, freebsd already has a xyz.ko, and it is already loaded, so it fails. > > So my question is, how do I unload the existing xyz.ko before I load the > new one ? > > Can I do it in sysinstall ? > > Can I do it in the loader prompt prior to sysinstall ? > > ______________________________________________ > Did you try from the emergency console on F4? Haven't had to try this myself but, it would be worth a try. Chad From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 20:51:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC30F16A403 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:51:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC3E43CBD for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:50:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so151165nzh for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:51:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=QzqQLho1ALyvquUnlGcZpaTr/2tTNu2ZDfiZRQqgYwiX7MxgNOJxjE+FE+rawMFdgj/SJr6AjJcCTS8IzeP4443Juwhk8G8EIjR0bxm+UWwPiP/ehn1KoFqMhiBBH/jvzVhPkT0sUB++9GPVh4YlkpPdrjJ2tqLpeWj1BuI1Jck= Received: by 10.65.210.18 with SMTP id m18mr70465qbq.1166043097549; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:51:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.75.14 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:51:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <17489c7a0612131251u6fb3fe73r562f168e68664306@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:51:37 -0500 From: "Chad Gross" To: "Ensel Sharon" In-Reply-To: <17489c7a0612131250u753c149cv11a98a67bea9b8b0@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <17489c7a0612131250u753c149cv11a98a67bea9b8b0@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can I unload a module from within sysinstall ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:51:45 -0000 On 12/13/06, Chad Gross wrote: > > On 12/13/06, Ensel Sharon wrote: > > > > > > I need to load a new kernel module during sysinstall so that I can see > > my > > raid controller. > > > > Easy - I go into configure, load, and load it off the floppy. Easy. > > > > BUT, freebsd already has a xyz.ko, and it is already loaded, so it > > fails. > > > > So my question is, how do I unload the existing xyz.ko before I load the > > new one ? > > > > Can I do it in sysinstall ? > > > > Can I do it in the loader prompt prior to sysinstall ? > > > > ______________________________________________ > > > > Did you try from the emergency console on F4? > > Haven't had to try this myself but, it would be worth a try. > > Chad Sorry, the command would be 'kldunload xyz.ko' From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 20:57:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B635516A4B3 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:57:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E630843D8F for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:55:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so100246ana for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:56:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=SLkJK/wSA2z18sqgXMoBA3wz8HfRVPz7zFBskZwXi7Yyd+9gclUB6nnO0l4l+ZLvC8KyH5Z59w0vlJD5dKqa0XNdu6G7z9QAjYUlJbpa/eC5yNd5yU673ZN7iA0UROI6lp4ByCHOz9oMBjtLdqL6C3eEbMLzCy5MqCrpvSuvRuU= Received: by 10.100.128.8 with SMTP id a8mr901260and.1166043411534; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:56:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.111.20 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:56:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0612131256p5e2db7dan9406c693d42ad93c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:56:51 +0100 From: VeeJay To: FreeBSD-Questions , maanjee@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Please help* X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:57:37 -0000 I am a novice with Unix and user of MySQL on windows=85.. I have a problem, i.e. I want to install MySQL5.0 at my FreeBSD 6.1 box with following configurations: --prefix=3D/usr/local/mysql --with-mysqld-user=3Dmysql --with-unix-socket-path=3D/tmp/mysql.sock --with-mysqld-ldflags=3D-all-static How and at What place, can I configure the Makefile under /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-server/ to have MySQL server working with above mentioned configurations? --=20 Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 21:05:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C0816A47C for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:05:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikes@signull.com) Received: from mercury.mv.net (mercury.mv.net [199.125.85.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B396743CB9 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:04:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikes@signull.com) Received: (qmail 11692 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2006 16:05:32 -0500 Received: from [207.22.49.214] (dslv-3-214.mv.com [207.22.49.214]) by mercury.mv.net ([199.125.85.40]) with ESMTP (MVMTR 0.14.0); Wed, 13 December 2006 16:05:32 -0500 (EST) X-Peer-Info: remote-ip 207.22.49.214 local-ip 199.125.85.40 local-name mercury.mv.net Message-ID: <45806AE5.7020709@signull.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:04:37 -0500 From: Mike Spenard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060922) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Sendmail&DNSBL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:05:40 -0000 Hi, I have sendmail configured for the following hypothetical domains: mydomaina.com mydomainb.com I would like sendmail to do DNSBL checking on mydomaina.com but not mydomainb.com, is this possible? -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 21:24:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6911116A403 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:24:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E2943CB3 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:22:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBDLNw7f061389; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:23:58 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk from=m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk; sender-id=permerror; spf=permerror X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk kBDLNw7f061389 Message-ID: <45806F67.1070007@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:23:51 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: brian merrell References: <20061213203608.EA69A43DEE@ws5-1.us4.outblaze.com> In-Reply-To: <20061213203608.EA69A43DEE@ws5-1.us4.outblaze.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig2E4064FDE8E6D969B8C9EC2D" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:24:08 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/2325/Wed Dec 13 17:04:05 2006 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_POLICY_TESTING,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: javaws X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:24:27 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig2E4064FDE8E6D969B8C9EC2D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable brian merrell wrote: > I've been googleing all morning on this one... >=20 > I'm need to get javaws to work. I am using FreeBSD6.1-RELEASE amd64. >=20 > I've tried installing the diablo packages (both jdk and jre), and=20 > apparently it does not include javaws, is this correct? >=20 > I've tried installing the linux-sun-jdk15 package. It installed=20 > okay, but javaws is broken: >=20 > " > [root@cobweb /usr/ports/java/linux-sun-jdk15]# javaws > Java Web Start splash screen process exiting ... > Bad installation: JAVAWS_HOME not set: No such file or directory > " >=20 > And I've tried compiling /usr/ports/java/jdk15 and it fails: >=20 > # > # SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=3D0xffffefd4, pid=3D28699, tid=3D49156 > # > # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.4.2_12-b03 mixed mode) > # Problematic frame: > # C 0xffffefd4 > # > # An error report file with more information is saved as hs_err_pid2869= 9.log > # > # If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit: > # http://java.sun.com/webapps/bugreport/crash.jsp >=20 > Any pointers or ideas? javaws is a necessity for me. >=20 > Thanks, > Brian. >=20 > I have attached hs_err_pid28699.log >=20 > Works for me using diablo-jdk 1.5.x: happy-idiot-talk:~:% pkg_which /usr/local/bin/javaws=20 javavmwrapper-2.3 If you install a JDK or JRE from ports you should get a link via the javavmwrapper that makes javaws work -- and you don't need to set anythin= g special in your environment either. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig2E4064FDE8E6D969B8C9EC2D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFgG9t8Mjk52CukIwRCLh4AJ4vZHavE8xuqv51JjGQDCagBfy44gCggDB7 L1wmoA884MuXNG4c+VWpNMM= =5LIL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig2E4064FDE8E6D969B8C9EC2D-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 21:33:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87AE516A403 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:33:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F2A43CA6 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:31:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin05-en2 [10.13.10.150]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout12/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kBDLX1EL003681; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:33:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from [17.214.13.96] (a17-214-13-96.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin05/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kBDLWxxI021798; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:33:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0612131256p5e2db7dan9406c693d42ad93c@mail.gmail.com> References: <2cd0a0da0612131256p5e2db7dan9406c693d42ad93c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:32:58 -0800 To: VeeJay X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-scanned: yes Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: Please help* X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:33:04 -0000 On Dec 13, 2006, at 12:56 PM, VeeJay wrote: > I want to install MySQL5.0 at my FreeBSD 6.1 box with following > configurations: > > --prefix=/usr/local/mysql > --with-mysqld-user=mysql > --with-unix-socket-path=/tmp/mysql.sock > --with-mysqld-ldflags=-all-static > > How and at What place, can I configure the Makefile under > /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-server/ > to have MySQL server working with above mentioned configurations? See CONFIGURE_ARGS in /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-server/Makefile. Note that the $PREFIX is already configured pretty much right already, and that mysql will run as a "mysql" user, and that putting the MySQL socket under /tmp is already done for you. I'm not sure why you want to statically link MySQL, but if you really want to do so, that would be the only argument likely worth changing in the port's Makefile.... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 21:44:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1056516A403 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:44:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nwatson@nwatson.org) Received: from cirrus.ash.nwatson.org (c-69-244-235-114.hsd1.va.comcast.net [69.244.235.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E3F43C9F for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:42:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nwatson@nwatson.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by cirrus.ash.nwatson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B96154DB4; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:45:21 -0500 (EST) X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Processed: Wed Dec 13 16:45:21 2006 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9997 X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000 X-DSPAM-Signature: 45807471168971330189995 X-DSPAM-Factors: 27, X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at X-Spam-Score: -1.54 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.54 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.44, DSPAM_HAM=-0.1] Received: from cirrus.ash.nwatson.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cirrus.ash.nwatson.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KxTvg2xxQc-C; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:45:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from cirrus.ash.nwatson.org (cirrus.ash.nwatson.org [10.0.0.2]) by cirrus.ash.nwatson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 109FB154DAE; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:45:21 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <23145615.521166046320874.JavaMail.root@cirrus> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:45:20 -0500 (EST) From: Nathan Watson To: julien Chaffraix In-Reply-To: <45803EC8.6040804@yahoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: ipf stateful rules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:44:28 -0000 Thanks for the reply - my IPNAT config is this: map hme0 10.0.0.0/16 -> 0/32 rdr hme0 0/0 port 22 -> 10.0.0.2 port 22 rdr hme0 0/0 port 25 -> 10.0.0.2 port 25 rdr hme0 0/0 port 236 -> 10.0.0.2 port 236 rdr hme0 0/0 port 237 -> 10.0.0.2 port 237 rdr hme0 0/0 port 113 -> 10.0.0.4 port 113 rdr hme0 0/0 port 5800-5900 -> 10.0.0.4 port 5800 rdr hme0 0/0 port 6881-6889 -> 10.0.0.2 port 6881 rdr hme0 0/0 port 7071 -> 10.0.0.2 port 7071 ----- Original Message ----- From: julien Chaffraix To: Nathan Watson Cc: freebsd-questions Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 12:56:24 PM GMT-0500 US/Eastern Subject: Re: ipf stateful rules Nathan Watson wrote: > Hello, > I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 with IPF/IPNAT, and I'm having a problem getting my rules to work. The problem is mainly that I want no restrictions on outbound traffic, and I'm not sure how to apply stateful filtering to that. I have the following rule (hme0 is my external interface): > > pass out quick on hme0 all > > If I change that to "pass out quick on hme0 all keep state," will that only open the port that the outbound packet was on? Are there any problems that can arise from allowing all outbound traffic? At the moment, my ruleset doesn't pass packets at all... I'm just having lots of troubles here. My ruleset is below, and everything seems to be caught by the last block all rule. Any suggestions? > > You can use "pass out quick on hme0 all keep state" just to allow outgoing traffic without restriction. You didn't mention the IPNAT ruleset which could explain your problem. For your use I would have something like : map hm0 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0.0.0.0/32 Cheers, Julien > Thanks, > nwatson > > # no restrictions on internal LAN > pass out quick on hme1 all > pass in quick on hme1 all > > # no restrictions on loopback > pass out quick on lo0 all > pass in quick on lo0 all > > # no outbound restrictions > pass out quick on hme0 all keep state > > # block all from non-routable or reserved address space > > block in quick on hme0 from 172.16.0.0/12 to any # private > block in quick on hme0 from 10.0.0.0/8 to any # private > block in quick on hme0 from 127.0.0.0/8 to any # loopback > block in quick on hme0 from 0.0.0.0/8 to any # loopback > block in quick on hme0 from 169.254.0.0/16 to any # dhcp auto-config > block in quick on hme0 from 192.0.2.0/24 to any # reserved for docs > block in quick on hme0 from 204.152.64.0/23 to any # sun cluster interconnect > block in quick on hme0 from 224.0.0.0/3 to any # class d & e multicast > > # inbound blocks > > block in quick on hme0 all with frags # frags > block in quick on hme0 proto tcp all with short # short tcp packets > block in quick on hme0 all with opt lsrr # source routed packets > block in quick on hme0 all with opt ssrr # source routed packets > block in log first quick on hme0 proto tcp from any to any flags FUP # nmap os fingerprint attempts, log > block in quick on hme0 all with ipopts # anything with special options > block in quick on hme0 proto icmp all icmp-type 8 # public pings > block in log first quick on hme0 proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 137 # netbios name > block in log first quick on hme0 proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 138 # netbios datagram > block in log first quick on hme0 proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 139 # netbios session > block in log first quick on hme0 proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 81 # hosts2 name server requests > > # allow these > > pass in quick on hme0 proto tcp from any to any port = 22 flags S keep state # ssh > pass in quick on hme0 proto tcp from any to any port = 25 flags S keep state # smtp > pass in quick on hme0 proto tcp from any to any port = 236 flags S keep state # http > pass in quick on hme0 proto tcp from any to any port = 237 flags S keep state # zimbra https > pass in quick on hme0 proto tcp from any to any port = 113 flags S keep state # ident > pass in quick on hme0 proto tcp from any to any port 5800 >< 5900 flags S keep state # vnc > pass in quick on hme0 proto tcp/udp from any to any port 6881 >< 6889 keep state # bittorrent > pass in quick on hme0 proto tcp from any to any port = 7071 flags S keep state # zimbra admin https > > # block, log all remaining traffic > > block in log first quick on hme0 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 22:05:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14C816A40F for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:05:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5D243CA3 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:04:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from riemann.math.jussieu.fr (riemann.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.3]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.13.7/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id kBDM5hS8026280 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:05:43 +0100 (CET) X-Ids: 168 Received: from grobner1.math.jussieu.fr (galois2.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.117]) by riemann.math.jussieu.fr (8.13.6/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id kBDM5l7l010608 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:05:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from galois2.math.jussieu.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by grobner1.math.jussieu.fr (8.13.8/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id kBDM5fai002442 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:05:41 +0100 Received: (from jas@localhost) by galois2.math.jussieu.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id kBDM5fpV002441 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:05:41 +0100 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:05:41 +0100 From: Albert Shih To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061213220541.GD31461@math.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.168]); Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:05:43 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.5/2325/Wed Dec 13 18:04:05 2006 on shiva.jussieu.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 45807937.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! Subject: Jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: shih@math.jussieu.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:05:45 -0000 Hi all Some question about jail : Can I use postfix/courier-imap in a jail ? (without any patch of-course, with and without chroot) Can I use bind in a jail (with and without chroot) ? If I make many jail how can I update all without lot of recompilation ? Using nullfs ? Where can I find a good documentation (especialy over 6.x), with google I don't find a good doc, all I find is for 4.x, or something very little doc. Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Wed Dec 13 23:02:05 CET 2006 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 22:10:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4569516A407 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:10:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B4243CC2 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:09:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BBC13D801; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:19:38 -0600 (CST) Received: by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 973C913D800; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:19:37 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9624413D7EF; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:19:37 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:19:37 -0600 (CST) From: Philip Hallstrom To: Albert Shih In-Reply-To: <20061213220541.GD31461@math.jussieu.fr> Message-ID: <20061213161753.T99278@bravo.pjkh.com> References: <20061213220541.GD31461@math.jussieu.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:10:59 -0000 > Can I use postfix/courier-imap in a jail ? (without any patch of-course, with and without chroot) Yes for postfix... I do it now. I would assume courier-imap would work as well. The only apps that won't work are ones that rely on ICMP (like nagios trying to ping servers). > Can I use bind in a jail (with and without chroot) ? Sure. > If I make many jail how can I update all without lot of recompilation ? > Using nullfs ? ezjail -> http://erdgeist.org/arts/software/ezjail/ It does exactly what you're wantingto do. -philip From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 22:21:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E6916A403 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:21:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bean@linuxmail.org) Received: from webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3565543C9D for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:20:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bean@linuxmail.org) Received: from unknown (unknown [192.168.9.180]) by webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with QMQP id 8F5961800D49 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:21:36 +0000 (GMT) X-OB-Received: from unknown (205.158.62.16) by wfilter.us4.outblaze.com; 13 Dec 2006 22:21:36 -0000 Received: by ws5-10.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 623967AE9F; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:21:36 +0000 (GMT) Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "brian merrell" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:21:36 +0800 Received: from [151.155.224.83] by ws5-10.us4.outblaze.com with http for bean@linuxmail.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:21:36 +0800 X-Originating-Ip: 151.155.224.83 X-Originating-Server: ws5-10.us4.outblaze.com Message-Id: <20061213222136.623967AE9F@ws5-10.us4.outblaze.com> Subject: Re: javaws X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:21:38 -0000 Thanks for your response Matthew. This has been my experience: [root@cobweb /usr/ports/java/javavmwrapper]# make install clean (installs OK) [root@cobweb /usr/ports/java/diablo-jdk15]# make install clean (installs OK) [root@cobweb /home/bean]# find / -name javaws [root@cobweb /home/bean]# find / -name *javaws* /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/man/man1/javaws.1 Am I missing something? Brian > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matthew Seaman" > To: "brian merrell" > Subject: Re: javaws > Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:23:51 +0000 >=20 >=20 > brian merrell wrote: > > I've been googleing all morning on this one... > > > > I'm need to get javaws to work. I am using FreeBSD6.1-RELEASE amd64. > > > > I've tried installing the diablo packages (both jdk and jre), and=20 > > apparently it does not include javaws, is this correct? > > > > I've tried installing the linux-sun-jdk15 package. It installed=20 > > okay, but javaws is broken: > > > > " > > [root@cobweb /usr/ports/java/linux-sun-jdk15]# javaws > > Java Web Start splash screen process exiting ... > > Bad installation: JAVAWS_HOME not set: No such file or directory > > " > > > > And I've tried compiling /usr/ports/java/jdk15 and it fails: > > > > # > > # SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=3D0xffffefd4, pid=3D28699, tid=3D49156 > > # > > # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.4.2_12-b03 mixed mode) > > # Problematic frame: > > # C 0xffffefd4 > > # > > # An error report file with more information is saved as hs_err_pid2869= 9.log > > # > > # If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit: > > # http://java.sun.com/webapps/bugreport/crash.jsp > > > > Any pointers or ideas? javaws is a necessity for me. > > > > Thanks, > > Brian. > > > > I have attached hs_err_pid28699.log > > > > >=20 > Works for me using diablo-jdk 1.5.x: >=20 > happy-idiot-talk:~:% pkg_which /usr/local/bin/javaws > javavmwrapper-2.3 >=20 > If you install a JDK or JRE from ports you should get a link via the > javavmwrapper that makes javaws work -- and you don't need to set anything > special in your environment either. >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Matthew >=20 > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > Kent, CT11 9PW > << signature.asc >> > --=20 _______________________________________________ Get your free email from http://www.linuxmail.org Powered by Outblaze From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 22:28:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2257816A415 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:28:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (pool-71-245-104-192.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [71.245.104.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DAD343CA1 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:26:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (localhost.home.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBDMSTL0023374 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:28:29 -0800 Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id kBDMSTEO023367 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:28:29 -0800 Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id WAA11949; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:15:53 GMT Message-Id: <200612132215.WAA11949@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:15:53 +0000 From: Dieter Subject: disk I/O tuning parameters X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:28:39 -0000 I've been experimenting with vfs.hirunningspace and it has some interesting effects. Is there a different, more detailed, description of its effects (and/or similar tuning parameters) than found in http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/configtuning-disk.html Is there a way to limit the runningspace, bufspace, or similar parameters on a per disk, per process, or per file basis rather than system wide? I haven't been able to find anything. I need a way to protect the disk I/O bandwidth of one process from other processes. Having its own disk, and running at rtprio is not sufficient. (See "processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O" thread in -questions for more details.) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 22:35:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B2E16A403 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:35:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CEE43CBB for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:34:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.6/8.13.8) id kBDMZXCs058643; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:35:33 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:35:33 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Beech Rintoul Message-ID: <20061213223533.GD79418@dan.emsphone.com> References: <200612131127.07238.beech@alaskaparadise.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200612131127.07238.beech@alaskaparadise.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shar question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:35:54 -0000 In the last episode (Dec 13), Beech Rintoul said: > I'm trying to learn how to use shar. I've read the manual. > > If I pass a directory to shar: > > shar foo > foo.shar > > Results in a shar file. Problem is that when I unpack it I just end > up with an empty directory. I probably need to pass it a flag or > something, but I'm not sure which one to use. > > How do I make a shar file out of a directory and ALL it's contents. If you want to get sneaky, you can use bsdtar, since that's one of its supported output formats: tar --format=shar -cvf foo.shar foo -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 22:37:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3496A16A412 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:37:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C5143CD6 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:35:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so285965uge for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:36:35 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=badVK/WJjI8u5oj3gHi98EmNwnhJ9fgzTfIygXc29QeuVLZ8g+rU9bsTYXAxoXF2cwTZD3UYRMtLfx6rreIJRMhLXX8Fz96Kx3SE3ierairM9oz1WVfzEL+P6Q615L/f1rHrw8fypaL4Jg4WcuPB9E7lL3Oh69D5fYpfKuXtBCg= Received: by 10.78.204.7 with SMTP id b7mr212436hug.1166049394537; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:36:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.161.19 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:36:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7a4a15bd0612131436j7d289ba8h989ba4400b72a3ad@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:36:34 -0600 From: Tuareg To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200612131447.28141.lane@joeandlane.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061206034909.27125.qmail@web37214.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200612131333.20652.lane@joeandlane.com> <7a4a15bd0612131231q3fd8e9eat198da67d41cbef48@mail.gmail.com> <200612131447.28141.lane@joeandlane.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:37:11 -0000 On 12/13/06, Lane wrote: > > Tuareg, > > Post /etc/rc.conf from one of the servers that does what you want and that > should lead us to what mta is handling email. cat /etc/rc.conf ### Network daemon (miscellaneous) & NFS options: ### sendmail_enable="NONE" # Run the sendmail daemon (or NO). cron_enable="YES" # Run the periodic job daemon. portmap_enable="NO" # Run the portmapper service (or NO). usbd_enable="NO" sshd_enable="YES" tcp_drop_synfin="YES" tcp_restrict_rst="YES" syslogd_enable="YES" # Run syslog daemon (or NO). syslogd_flags="-s -s" # Flags to syslogd (if enabled). > Also, please post a copy of > > ls -al /usr/local/etc/rc.d > > from that same working server, just in case there is a custom script > starting > the mta. > > lane ls -al /usr/local/etc/rc.d total 10 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Jan 23 2003 . drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 512 Oct 30 18:06 .. -rwxr--r-- 1 root wheel 624 Jan 14 2003 squid.sh And that's all. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 22:54:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C68616A4AB for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:54:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D93943CA2 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:53:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Guczr-00055Q-Us for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:54:44 -0500 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost.localnet.local [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kBDMvKxl003433 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:57:20 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id kBDMvIbT003431 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:57:18 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:57:17 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061206034909.27125.qmail@web37214.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200612131447.28141.lane@joeandlane.com> <7a4a15bd0612131436j7d289ba8h989ba4400b72a3ad@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7a4a15bd0612131436j7d289ba8h989ba4400b72a3ad@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612131657.18164.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79884cca58a53b46ef353825c56098f6b2350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:54:45 -0000 On Wednesday 13 December 2006 16:36, Tuareg wrote: > On 12/13/06, Lane wrote: > > Tuareg, > > > > Post /etc/rc.conf from one of the servers that does what you want and > > that should lead us to what mta is handling email. > > cat /etc/rc.conf > > ### Network daemon (miscellaneous) & NFS options: ### > sendmail_enable="NONE" # Run the sendmail daemon (or NO). > cron_enable="YES" # Run the periodic job daemon. > portmap_enable="NO" # Run the portmapper service (or NO). > usbd_enable="NO" > sshd_enable="YES" > tcp_drop_synfin="YES" > tcp_restrict_rst="YES" > syslogd_enable="YES" # Run syslog daemon (or NO). > syslogd_flags="-s -s" # Flags to syslogd (if enabled). > > > Also, please post a copy of > > > > ls -al /usr/local/etc/rc.d > > > > from that same working server, just in case there is a custom script > > starting > > the mta. > > > > lane > > ls -al /usr/local/etc/rc.d > total 10 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Jan 23 2003 . > drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 512 Oct 30 18:06 .. > -rwxr--r-- 1 root wheel 624 Jan 14 2003 squid.sh > > And that's all. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Tuareg, Yours is a mystery. Let's see the output of tail -200 /var/log/maillog from the working machine. Clearly there is no mta being started on boot. But I'm not familiar enough with squid to say for sure that it is not the daemon in question. It may be that squid is configurable so that it could be delivering the log messages. I'll make it and see what I can see. In the mean time, if anyone else has some ready experience to say for certain that this is probably what's happening, then jump right in. lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 23:00:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574D216A40F for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:00:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BDA443C9F for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:58:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEEC81A3C1C; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:00:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4F26951606; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:00:17 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:00:17 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Ian Smith Message-ID: <20061213230017.GB58514@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20061213193838.GA57916@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: /pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-stable/All/ X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:00:18 -0000 --kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 07:26:42AM +1100, Ian Smith wrote: > On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 03:44:13AM +1100, Ian Smith wrote: > [..] > > > I was glad I'd specified -PP .. every fetch from $subject directory > > > failed. Checking manually, then and again tonight, I see that indeed > > > only the versions of files that were (correctly) current at 4th Dece= mber > > > are still there now. The latest file date there says 17th November. > > >=20 > > > Is this likely a temporary glitch, or do -stable packages only get > > > updated to match the current ports tree after some expectable delay? >=20 > > There's always a lag, of course (computers aren't yet infinitely fast > > ;-). It's usually only a lag of a couple of days for 6.x, longer for > > 5.x since it's a "legacy" branch and not our main focus of activity. >=20 > As we're often enough reminded :) Thought I'd get it all up to date, > then cvsup to 6.2 once released. >=20 > > However the main FTP distribution server has been offline with > > hardware failure for the past week or two, so I can't push out any of > > the subsequent updates. Hopefully this will be resolved soon (it's > > also holding up the 6.2 release cycle). >=20 > Thanks Kris, may it Get Well Soon. =20 >=20 > BTW, just to try, I'd installed 6.1-R on another box over the net from > the boot-only CD, and enjoyed being able to install heaps of packages > from sysinstall that way, but was a bit dismayed to find it hadn't kept > the fetched packages .. is there a way to ask sysinstall to do that?=20 I dont think so, sysinstall isn't really intended as a post-install package management tool. Kris=20 --kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFgIYAWry0BWjoQKURAiyLAKDcAghVHaptDjT2JY3c3ygkhMraUgCgyVg7 i5xlYuhOQtDaoG/792kBYcc= =neH+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 23:17:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069A916A403 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:17:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bastiaan@welmers.net) Received: from smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB48543CA6 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:15:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bastiaan@welmers.net) Received: from routeduvel.rembrandtkd.welmers.net (welmers.xs4all.nl [80.126.238.7]) by smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBDNHCsB044059; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:17:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bastiaan@welmers.net) Received: by routeduvel.rembrandtkd.welmers.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id D1ABA2C043; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:17:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:17:19 +0100 From: Bastiaan Welmers To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, kde-freebsd@freebsd.kde.org Message-ID: <20061213231719.GY873@routeduvel.rembrandtkd.welmers.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Disclaimer: running NetBSD X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: Subject: gamin/fam issues with KDE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:17:32 -0000 Hi, For a while now the file monitor program fam has been replaced by gamin. When using KDE it seems to have the following issues: - when opening a directory with konqueror/kuickshow/some other KDE program, where removable media(USB stick, CDROM) is mounted, KDE/gamin seems to keep the directory occupied, causing problems when trying to unmount the removable media. When using fam instead of gamin, there's no problem unmounting the device. - sometimes I still can't unmount the media even if all KDE windows (and other programs) are closed. I think some instance of gamin or KDE keeps running although all windows have been closed. This also indicates sometimes not all processes are terminated well. Now I'm using fam instead of gamin again. I think it should be nice if this would become standard or the gamin issue wil be resolved, because it's quite annoying not being able to unmount removable media all the time. Did someone else experience the same behaviour? Strange thing is that when I try to find processes keeping the mounted device occupied, nothing can be found, with fstat nor with lsof. This could be because gamin's only polling a short time in a period. /Bastiaan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 23:22:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39ED16A40F for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:22:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D2C643C9E for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:21:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so296076uge for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:22:42 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=BArfM7IcPKpat0KJhfigBL5wHvOfzvwbGgdI3b1p1l1SXzznmZUxdqjDSQ3ZFbDRpb1MbjIZcL80VVSv38AgAU5V1x+ZoEQhllhMEDMhn6FFi3L+6vOirGeDYzoofXs97bzRWB0LzQDrsGz8+IWTRrfzcKBkuavPpAweyTUpPiQ= Received: by 10.78.200.3 with SMTP id x3mr208045huf.1166052161261; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:22:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.161.19 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:22:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7a4a15bd0612131522t2942b44bo4412d1e16c6ed2e6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:22:41 -0600 From: Tuareg To: Lane In-Reply-To: <200612131657.18164.lane@joeandlane.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061206034909.27125.qmail@web37214.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200612131447.28141.lane@joeandlane.com> <7a4a15bd0612131436j7d289ba8h989ba4400b72a3ad@mail.gmail.com> <200612131657.18164.lane@joeandlane.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:22:45 -0000 On 12/13/06, Lane wrote: > > Tuareg, > > Yours is a mystery. Exactly... I can't find how the server is sending the emails without having sendmail active. Let's see the output of > > tail -200 /var/log/maillog > > from the working machine. Ok, here we go.... Dec 13 00:00:00 myhost newsyslog[41433]: logfile turned over Dec 13 00:00:02 myhost sendmail[41485]: gethostbyaddr(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) failed: 1 Dec 13 00:00:02 myhost sendmail[41485]: kBD602j41485: from=root, size=137, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=< 200612130600.kBD602j41485@server.FreeBSD.4.6-RELEASE>, relay=root@localhost Dec 13 00:00:03 myhost sendmail[41488]: kBD602j41485: to= user@main.server.com, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, pri=30137, relay=main.server.com. [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (AYP95973 Message accepted for delivery) Dec 13 01:00:02 myhost sendmail[41626]: gethostbyaddr(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) failed: 1 Dec 13 01:00:03 myhost sendmail[41626]: kBD702J41626: from=root, size=137, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=< 200612130700.kBD702J41626@server.FreeBSD.4.6-RELEASE>, relay=root@localhost Dec 13 01:00:04 myhost sendmail[41629]: kBD702J41626: to= user@main.server.com, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:02, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, pri=30137, relay=main.server.com. [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (AYM94014 Message accepted for delivery) Dec 13 02:00:01 myhost sendmail[41741]: gethostbyaddr(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) failed: 1 Dec 13 02:00:01 myhost sendmail[41741]: kBD801C41741: from=root, size=137, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=< 200612130800.kBD801C41741@server.FreeBSD.4.6-RELEASE>, relay=root@localhost Dec 13 02:00:02 myhost sendmail[41744]: kBD801C41741: to= user@main.server.com, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, pri=30137, relay=main.server.com. [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (AYQ08859 Message accepted for delivery) Dec 13 03:00:01 myhost sendmail[41850]: gethostbyaddr(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) failed: 1 Dec 13 03:00:02 myhost sendmail[41850]: kBD901x41850: from=root, size=137, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=< 200612130900.kBD901x41850@server.FreeBSD.4.6-RELEASE>, relay=root@localhost Dec 13 03:00:03 myhost sendmail[41853]: kBD901x41850: to= user@main.server.com, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:02, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, pri=30137, relay=main.server.com. [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (AYX97507 Message accepted for delivery) Dec 13 04:00:01 myhost sendmail[41954]: gethostbyaddr(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) failed: 1 Dec 13 04:00:01 myhost sendmail[41954]: kBDA01S41954: from=root, size=137, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=< 200612131000.kBDA01S41954@server.FreeBSD.4.6-RELEASE>, relay=root@localhost Dec 13 04:00:02 myhost sendmail[41957]: kBDA01S41954: to= user@main.server.com, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, pri=30137, relay=main.server.com. [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (AYN10182 Message accepted for delivery) Dec 13 05:00:01 myhost sendmail[42057]: gethostbyaddr(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) failed: 1 Dec 13 05:00:02 myhost sendmail[42057]: kBDB01842057: from=root, size=137, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=< 200612131100.kBDB01842057@server.FreeBSD.4.6-RELEASE>, relay=root@localhost Dec 13 05:00:03 myhost sendmail[42060]: kBDB01842057: to= user@main.server.com, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:02, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, pri=30137, relay=main.server.com. [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (AYY07081 Message accepted for delivery) Dec 13 06:00:01 myhost sendmail[42160]: gethostbyaddr(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) failed: 1 Dec 13 06:00:01 myhost sendmail[42160]: kBDC01p42160: from=root, size=137, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=< 200612131200.kBDC01p42160@server.FreeBSD.4.6-RELEASE>, relay=root@localhost Dec 13 06:00:02 myhost sendmail[42163]: kBDC01p42160: to= user@main.server.com, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, pri=30137, relay=main.server.com. [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (AYQ28469 Message accepted for delivery) Dec 13 07:00:02 myhost sendmail[42257]: gethostbyaddr(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) failed: 1 Dec 13 07:00:02 myhost sendmail[42257]: kBDD02342257: from=root, size=137, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=< 200612131300.kBDD02342257@server.FreeBSD.4.6-RELEASE>, relay=root@localhost Dec 13 07:00:03 myhost sendmail[42260]: kBDD02342257: to= user@main.server.com, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, pri=30137, relay=main.server.com. [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (AYY16076 Message accepted for delivery) Dec 13 08:00:03 myhost sendmail[42364]: gethostbyaddr(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) failed: 1 Dec 13 08:00:03 myhost sendmail[42364]: kBDE03W42364: from=root, size=136, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=< 200612131400.kBDE03W42364@server.FreeBSD.4.6-RELEASE>, relay=root@localhost Dec 13 08:00:05 myhost sendmail[42367]: kBDE03W42364: to= user@main.server.com, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:02, xdelay=00:00:02, mailer=esmtp, pri=30136, relay=main.server.com. [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (AYQ38182 Message accepted for delivery) Dec 13 09:00:01 myhost sendmail[42461]: gethostbyaddr(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) failed: 1 Dec 13 09:00:01 myhost sendmail[42461]: kBDF01U42461: from=root, size=137, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=< 200612131500.kBDF01U42461@server.FreeBSD.4.6-RELEASE>, relay=root@localhost Dec 13 09:00:02 myhost sendmail[42464]: kBDF01U42461: to= user@main.server.com, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, pri=30137, relay=main.server.com. [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (AYY26346 Message accepted for delivery) Dec 13 10:00:02 myhost sendmail[42576]: gethostbyaddr(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) failed: 1 Dec 13 10:00:02 myhost sendmail[42576]: kBDG02i42576: from=root, size=137, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=< 200612131600.kBDG02i42576@server.FreeBSD.4.6-RELEASE>, relay=root@localhost Dec 13 10:00:03 myhost sendmail[42579]: kBDG02i42576: to= user@main.server.com, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, pri=30137, relay=main.server.com. [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (AYQ48491 Message accepted for delivery) Dec 13 11:00:02 myhost sendmail[42704]: gethostbyaddr(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) failed: 1 Dec 13 11:00:02 myhost sendmail[42704]: kBDH02T42704: from=root, size=136, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=< 200612131700.kBDH02T42704@server.FreeBSD.4.6-RELEASE>, relay=root@localhost Dec 13 11:00:03 myhost sendmail[42707]: kBDH02T42704: to= user@main.server.com, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, pri=30136, relay=main.server.com. [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (AYQ55071 Message accepted for delivery) Dec 13 12:00:01 myhost sendmail[42831]: gethostbyaddr(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) failed: 1 Dec 13 12:00:02 myhost sendmail[42831]: kBDI01Z42831: from=root, size=137, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=< 200612131800.kBDI01Z42831@server.FreeBSD.4.6-RELEASE>, relay=root@localhost Dec 13 12:00:04 myhost sendmail[42834]: kBDI01Z42831: to= user@main.server.com, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:02, xdelay=00:00:02, mailer=esmtp, pri=30137, relay=main.server.com. [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (AYY46161 Message accepted for delivery) Dec 13 13:00:04 myhost sendmail[42960]: gethostbyaddr(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) failed: 1 Dec 13 13:00:04 myhost sendmail[42960]: kBDJ04Q42960: from=root, size=137, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=< 200612131900.kBDJ04Q42960@server.FreeBSD.4.6-RELEASE>, relay=root@localhost Dec 13 13:00:07 myhost sendmail[42963]: kBDJ04Q42960: to= user@main.server.com, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:03, xdelay=00:00:03, mailer=esmtp, pri=30137, relay=main.server.com. [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (BAQ62230 Message accepted for delivery) Dec 13 14:00:01 myhost sendmail[43094]: gethostbyaddr(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) failed: 1 Dec 13 14:00:01 myhost sendmail[43094]: kBDK01143094: from=root, size=137, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=< 200612132000.kBDK01143094@server.FreeBSD.4.6-RELEASE>, relay=root@localhost Dec 13 14:00:02 myhost sendmail[43097]: kBDK01143094: to= user@main.server.com, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, pri=30137, relay=main.server.com. [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (BAQ70563 Message accepted for delivery) Dec 13 15:00:02 myhost sendmail[43227]: gethostbyaddr(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) failed: 1 Dec 13 15:00:02 myhost sendmail[43227]: kBDL02q43227: from=root, size=137, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=< 200612132100.kBDL02q43227@server.FreeBSD.4.6-RELEASE>, relay=root@localhost Dec 13 15:00:03 myhost sendmail[43230]: kBDL02q43227: to= user@main.server.com, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, pri=30137, relay=main.server.com. [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (AYQ87242 Message accepted for delivery) Dec 13 16:00:02 myhost sendmail[43362]: gethostbyaddr(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) failed: 1 Dec 13 16:00:02 myhost sendmail[43362]: kBDM02G43362: from=root, size=137, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=< 200612132200.kBDM02G43362@server.FreeBSD.4.6-RELEASE>, relay=root@localhost Dec 13 16:00:03 myhost sendmail[43365]: kBDM02G43362: to= user@main.server.com, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, pri=30137, relay=main.server.com. [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (AYN86757 Message accepted for delivery) Dec 13 17:00:02 myhost sendmail[43495]: gethostbyaddr(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) failed: 1 Dec 13 17:00:03 myhost sendmail[43495]: kBDN02743495: from=root, size=137, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<200612132300.kBDN027434 95@server.FreeBSD.4.6-RELEASE>, relay=root@localhost Dec 13 17:00:04 myhost sendmail[43498]: kBDN02743495: to= user@main.server.com, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:02, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, pri=30137, relay=main.server.com. [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (AYY85233 Message accepted for delivery) Clearly there is no mta being started on boot. But I'm not familiar enough > with squid to say for sure that it is not the daemon in question. It may > be > that squid is configurable so that it could be delivering the log > messages. > > I'll make it and see what I can see. > > In the mean time, if anyone else has some ready experience to say for > certain > that this is probably what's happening, then jump right in. > > lane > Thank you very much for your help. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 23:27:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7899416A47E for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:27:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD6C243D75 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:25:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so171426nzh for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:26:58 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=FN8LPKt6kZAwgJev1H0WUBFnt8adTXQf3BktcSMxPV47Vj6d+ietp5tbMGnZixuCX7ML+R9vwjLVHTzwXYcQNqWP5oJDr/QWDiKogShQHXHFbJnHB4YMxyHkZeqtEVVFojaPiQXHyocenbOT2p8shnOOBPBwcADxkIugQ9bnFZ0= Received: by 10.65.194.13 with SMTP id w13mr311021qbp.1166052418293; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:26:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.75.14 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:26:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <17489c7a0612131526v67d74964xb2136b4515dff29b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:26:58 -0500 From: "Chad Gross" To: Lane In-Reply-To: <200612131657.18164.lane@joeandlane.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061206034909.27125.qmail@web37214.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200612131447.28141.lane@joeandlane.com> <7a4a15bd0612131436j7d289ba8h989ba4400b72a3ad@mail.gmail.com> <200612131657.18164.lane@joeandlane.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:27:48 -0000 On 12/13/06, Lane wrote: > > On Wednesday 13 December 2006 16:36, Tuareg wrote: > > On 12/13/06, Lane wrote: > > > Tuareg, > > > > > > Post /etc/rc.conf from one of the servers that does what you want and > > > that should lead us to what mta is handling email. > > > > cat /etc/rc.conf > > > > ### Network daemon (miscellaneous) & NFS options: ### > > sendmail_enable="NONE" # Run the sendmail daemon (or NO). > > cron_enable="YES" # Run the periodic job daemon. > > portmap_enable="NO" # Run the portmapper service (or NO). > > usbd_enable="NO" > > sshd_enable="YES" > > tcp_drop_synfin="YES" > > tcp_restrict_rst="YES" > > syslogd_enable="YES" # Run syslog daemon (or NO). > > syslogd_flags="-s -s" # Flags to syslogd (if enabled). > > > > > Also, please post a copy of > > > > > > ls -al /usr/local/etc/rc.d > > > > > > from that same working server, just in case there is a custom script > > > starting > > > the mta. > > > > > > lane > > > > ls -al /usr/local/etc/rc.d > > total 10 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Jan 23 2003 . > > drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 512 Oct 30 18:06 .. > > -rwxr--r-- 1 root wheel 624 Jan 14 2003 squid.sh > > > > And that's all. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Tuareg, > > Yours is a mystery. > > Let's see the output of > > tail -200 /var/log/maillog > > from the working machine. > > Clearly there is no mta being started on boot. But I'm not familiar > enough > with squid to say for sure that it is not the daemon in question. It may > be > that squid is configurable so that it could be delivering the log > messages. > > I'll make it and see what I can see. > > In the mean time, if anyone else has some ready experience to say for > certain > that this is probably what's happening, then jump right in. > > lane > _______________________________________________ > You need something to be able to send emails to mail servers. Either a MUA which is capable of doing so (of which mail(8) is not) or an MTA locally. Are you sure you didn't follow these instructions on the other servers: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/outgoing-only.html How about trying them? Chad From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 23:27:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A16216A416 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:27:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E5A43CA5 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:25:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F281A4D9B; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:27:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A02DE513F8; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:27:26 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:27:26 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dieter Message-ID: <20061213232726.GA61149@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200612111832.SAA23589@sopwith.solgatos.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zhXaljGHf11kAtnf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200612111832.SAA23589@sopwith.solgatos.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O (was: Re: TCP parameters and interpreting tcpdump output ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:27:54 -0000 --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 10:32:53AM +0000, Dieter wrote: > > Did this problem start before you made port2file run with rtprio? >=20 > Yes. I only added rtprio because it wasn't working. >=20 > > Can you please include a copy of your kernel configuration file and dme= sg? >=20 > I think you asked that before: :-) OK, sorry - I lost track. > Is Giant the only mutex/lock that could be a bottleneck across disks? The only one I can think of that is generic. One would have to do more extensive profiling and diagnosis to try and figure out what is wrong with your system. The only explanation that seems to fit is that it's something to do with your particular hardware (i.e. driver issue), since it's certainly not a problem on general configurations. I know that many people have bad things to say about nforce chipsets, although I dont know if your particular problem has been reported before. Kris --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFgIxeWry0BWjoQKURAjQdAKD10yVK5OighGm1kQ5W25DYIcgOIACgsI0I XQZN/9av7Vo6TLqW8snrij4= =Gktu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 23:32:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 408C416A407 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:32:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE4843CA3 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:29:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GudYq-0006ic-Fj for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:30:52 -0500 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost.localnet.local [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kBDNXX6V003993 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:33:33 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id kBDNXWMA003992 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:33:32 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:33:32 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061206034909.27125.qmail@web37214.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200612131657.18164.lane@joeandlane.com> <7a4a15bd0612131522t2942b44bo4412d1e16c6ed2e6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7a4a15bd0612131522t2942b44bo4412d1e16c6ed2e6@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612131733.32763.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79b0db60d0464bec585318895add62c13e350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:32:58 -0000 On Wednesday 13 December 2006 17:22, Tuareg wrote: > On 12/13/06, Lane wrote: > > Tuareg, > > > > Yours is a mystery. > > Exactly... I can't find how the server is sending the emails without > having sendmail active. > > Let's see the output of > > > tail -200 /var/log/maillog > > > > from the working machine. > > Ok, here we go.... > > Dec 13 00:00:00 myhost newsyslog[41433]: logfile turned over > Dec 13 00:00:02 myhost sendmail[41485]: gethostbyaddr(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) > failed: 1 > Dec 13 00:00:02 myhost sendmail[41485]: kBD602j41485: from=root, size=137, > class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=< > 200612130600.kBD602j41485@server.FreeBSD.4.6-RELEASE>, relay=root@localhost > Dec 13 00:00:03 myhost sendmail[41488]: kBD602j41485: to= > user@main.server.com, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, > mailer=esmtp, pri=30137, relay=main.server.com. [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx], > dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (AYP95973 Message accepted for delivery) > Dec 13 01:00:02 myhost sendmail[41626]: gethostbyaddr(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) > failed: 1 > Dec 13 01:00:03 myhost sendmail[41626]: kBD702J41626: from=root, size=137, > class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=< > 200612130700.kBD702J41626@server.FreeBSD.4.6-RELEASE>, relay=root@localhost > Dec 13 01:00:04 myhost sendmail[41629]: kBD702J41626: to= > user@main.server.com, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:02, xdelay=00:00:01, > mailer=esmtp, pri=30137, relay=main.server.com. [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx], > dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (AYM94014 Message accepted for delivery) Tuareg, clearly sendmail is running. That is indicated by "sendmail[41626]" in your /var/log/sendmail log. The question, of course, is how does it get started. The answer is still mysterious ... unless, of course, it is being managed by squid. In that case it might not be running as a daemon process, but could be invoked by squid when it needs to send mail. But I'm just guessing at this point. I really don't know enough about squid to give you an authoritative answer. I've got to step out for a few hours, but I'll see what I can find out on squid and get back to you in the morning. lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 00:10:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7368516A518 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:10:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1067544380 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:56:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so303527uge for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:58:24 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=JeXEv0UWXR/jzVbjTWUDP+AzVQTU/JSGmPtAH2JWF6oB6Kb+qin+arihh6tKCOcGhasGxwl0K6RNAH9VTEO73jZIUVG6WqRXvjXSHljM3aDq1MvSlGhA8Z6274nlnylIOv4ccba1KGviFNxwjtcgPwqYhhCPuqAvAEtzRJSWvmY= Received: by 10.78.127.2 with SMTP id z2mr295824huc.1166054303682; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:58:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.161.19 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:58:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7a4a15bd0612131558v6c4d80b5q81a4cdd67263e37e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:58:23 -0600 From: Tuareg To: "Chad Gross" In-Reply-To: <17489c7a0612131526v67d74964xb2136b4515dff29b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061206034909.27125.qmail@web37214.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200612131447.28141.lane@joeandlane.com> <7a4a15bd0612131436j7d289ba8h989ba4400b72a3ad@mail.gmail.com> <200612131657.18164.lane@joeandlane.com> <17489c7a0612131526v67d74964xb2136b4515dff29b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:10:29 -0000 On 12/13/06, Chad Gross wrote: > You need something to be able to send emails to mail servers. Either a MUA > which is capable of doing so (of which mail(8) is not) or an MTA locally. > > Are you sure you didn't follow these instructions on the other servers: > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/outgoing-only.html No, I've already checked this option, but not, ssmtp port it's not being used. How about trying them? Could be, but its just that my boss believes that we can replicate the configuration of the old servers without installing anything else. Chad Thank you Chad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 00:10:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E7C16A522 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:10:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from business.oriented@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A644440CF for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:00:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from business.oriented@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so290542wxc for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:01:44 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=IFKDqMcP5UneW29a/ZEvLCtR1wwyAmIM9MQAMr0XHkYVJrpPoauoAOKuPuUePE3/qpsnlwqE2o+1oGUEZMcR++1SpCwNh/Zu3Q578ylA2u8mzdrhJZLvMGCrQb79WyvB23Jo34xy/jnv7H90vW91wD5A6mgW8g5h9TvKtgUqzDw= Received: by 10.70.65.8 with SMTP id n8mr378355wxa.1166054504413; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:01:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from bloodlust ( [69.60.116.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i37sm1809593wxd.2006.12.13.16.01.40; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:01:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <002001c71f12$f36c4560$71d3dcc9@bloodlust> From: "Ne'Bahn" To: "UNIX - questions" Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:00:20 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: Install via ports... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:10:55 -0000 Hi list, I've read the handbook for ports, basically (if I understand) ports are files that brings information (location, dependencies) to the system to compile a series of files (sources) to have the final piece of software. Very nice with the advantages that comes with this type of installation, but, what about a big applications like Gnome, OpenOffice and so on. I can't try ports because I can't have a fast/long connection for downloads (due to some restrictions on my country) so I always install via packages, and it takes a while, well a little bit. So what I am asking if is anyone has test a Gnome, OpenOffice.org, or any other big installations via ports (say in a Pentium 4 2.8GHz HT with 512Mb RAM) can tell me the elapsed time ??? Just curious...thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 00:11:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D51FA16A569 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:11:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5532E43DCF for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:01:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so304857uge for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:03:17 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=js8MsU/94boqfDlsCaKgIGsA5pLXgP1lTidPrnJTRqqyX4X9qv6KtSjW+TvqsPNRcEY/xhgTV3z2IjIjvPFQ1Z+Feg6cTcGMh2zB6HiaD75ihJnLvRoq2MZiG965B4OVDRkDQCXbeLFHfib+qjbrfVl/zs7Rc5a8nyxgtUp31Bs= Received: by 10.78.185.15 with SMTP id i15mr218371huf.1166054596663; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:03:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.161.19 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:03:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7a4a15bd0612131603h3041414aga979c01b28ba8f02@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:03:16 -0600 From: Tuareg To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200612131733.32763.lane@joeandlane.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061206034909.27125.qmail@web37214.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200612131657.18164.lane@joeandlane.com> <7a4a15bd0612131522t2942b44bo4412d1e16c6ed2e6@mail.gmail.com> <200612131733.32763.lane@joeandlane.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:11:18 -0000 On 12/13/06, Lane wrote: > Tuareg, > > clearly sendmail is running. That is indicated by "sendmail[41626]" in > your /var/log/sendmail log. > > The question, of course, is how does it get started. The answer is still > mysterious ... unless, of course, it is being managed by squid. In that > case > it might not be running as a daemon process, but could be invoked by squid > when it needs to send mail. That's exactly what is getting us crazy, "know how". But I'm just guessing at this point. I really don't know enough about squid > to give you an authoritative answer. > > I've got to step out for a few hours, but I'll see what I can find out on > squid and get back to you in the morning. > > lane > Thank you for your help and don't worry, we really appreciate all your help. It's time to get some fresh air, and tomorrow bring our brains to get this thing done. Cheers. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 00:11:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A45EC16A784 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:11:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@chillt.de) Received: from dd2718.kasserver.com (dd2718.kasserver.com [81.209.184.159]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5EC743CD4 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:05:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@chillt.de) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dslb-084-060-124-165.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.60.124.165]) by dd2718.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB66F7D6F; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:06:17 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45809593.5000902@chillt.de> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:06:43 +0000 From: Bartosz Fabianowski User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bastiaan Welmers References: <20061213231719.GY873@routeduvel.rembrandtkd.welmers.net> In-Reply-To: <20061213231719.GY873@routeduvel.rembrandtkd.welmers.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, kde-freebsd@freebsd.kde.org Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] gamin/fam issues with KDE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:11:38 -0000 Just a quick "me too". I have been seeing the exact same behavior ever since gamin was shoved down our throats as a better replacement for fam. But since nobody else complained, I figured it was just my system. Whatever gamin is doing, it is not showing up in lsof, but the file system is still busy. I did try tweaking my ~/.gaminrc to switch to polling for the mount points in question, but this didn't help. Oddly enough, sometimes, maybe one time out of ten, gamin will not exhibit this strange behavior. It will just let me unmount without any problems. - Bartosz From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 00:18:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1F516A47B for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:18:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bastiaan@welmers.net) Received: from smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3321243CA0 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:16:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bastiaan@welmers.net) Received: from routeduvel.rembrandtkd.welmers.net (welmers.xs4all.nl [80.126.238.7]) by smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBE0I1E3082584; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:18:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bastiaan@welmers.net) Received: by routeduvel.rembrandtkd.welmers.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id B8D182C043; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:18:09 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:18:09 +0100 From: Bastiaan Welmers To: Bartosz Fabianowski Message-ID: <20061214001809.GZ873@routeduvel.rembrandtkd.welmers.net> References: <20061213231719.GY873@routeduvel.rembrandtkd.welmers.net> <45809593.5000902@chillt.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45809593.5000902@chillt.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Disclaimer: running NetBSD X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, kde-freebsd@freebsd.kde.org Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] gamin/fam issues with KDE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:18:17 -0000 On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 12:06:43AM +0000, Bartosz Fabianowski wrote: > Just a quick "me too". I have been seeing the exact same behavior ever > since gamin was shoved down our throats as a better replacement for fam. > But since nobody else complained, I figured it was just my system. When building from ports it's quite easy to change back to fam, just put WITH_FAM_SYSTEM=fam into /etc/make.conf For existing systems/binary installed systems, you can just pkg_delete -f gamin* and install fam instead, so gamin libraries wil be replaced by the fam ones, it works well to me. One nasty thing is that when afterwards installing a package requiring gamin, it will fail with errors. To prevent this you could just "fake" the pkg db that gamin is installed however actually fam libraries are installed. > Whatever gamin is doing, it is not showing up in lsof, but the file > system is still busy. I did try tweaking my ~/.gaminrc to switch to > polling for the mount points in question, but this didn't help. Oddly > enough, sometimes, maybe one time out of ten, gamin will not exhibit > this strange behavior. It will just let me unmount without any problems. Maybe because you just unmount on exactly the right moment, when gamin is not occupying the file system? Or just all windows and processes are closed cleanly. /Bastiaan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 00:26:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA1D16A47B for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:26:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bastiaan@welmers.net) Received: from smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BAF043CB4 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:24:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bastiaan@welmers.net) Received: from routeduvel.rembrandtkd.welmers.net (welmers.xs4all.nl [80.126.238.7]) by smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBE0PvNm038540; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:25:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bastiaan@welmers.net) Received: by routeduvel.rembrandtkd.welmers.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 2C3952C044; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:26:05 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:26:04 +0100 From: Bastiaan Welmers To: "Ne'Bahn" Message-ID: <20061214002604.GA873@routeduvel.rembrandtkd.welmers.net> References: <002001c71f12$f36c4560$71d3dcc9@bloodlust> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002001c71f12$f36c4560$71d3dcc9@bloodlust> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Disclaimer: running NetBSD X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: UNIX - questions Subject: Re: Install via ports... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:26:08 -0000 On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 07:00:20PM -0500, Ne'Bahn wrote: > Hi list, I've read the handbook for ports, basically (if I understand) > ports are files that brings information (location, dependencies) to > the > system to compile a series of files (sources) to have the final piece > of > software. Very nice with the advantages that comes with this type of > installation, but, what about a big applications like Gnome, > OpenOffice and > so on. I can't try ports because I can't have a fast/long connection > for > downloads (due to some restrictions on my country) so I always install > via > packages, and it takes a while, well a little bit. You can do "make fetch" to fetch the required package distfiles first, or "make fetch-recursive" to fetch all the required distfiles of all packages required by this package. see "man ports" for other targets. /Bastiaan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 00:32:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD3E16A412 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:32:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2019943CD8 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:29:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBE0RrVn095108; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:27:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kBE0RrAH095107; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:27:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:27:53 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: "Ne'Bahn" Message-ID: <20061214002753.GA95048@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <002001c71f12$f36c4560$71d3dcc9@bloodlust> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002001c71f12$f36c4560$71d3dcc9@bloodlust> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: UNIX - questions Subject: Re: Install via ports... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:32:19 -0000 On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 07:00:20PM -0500, Ne'Bahn wrote: > Hi list, I've read the handbook for ports, basically (if I understand) > ports are files that brings information (location, dependencies) to the > system to compile a series of files (sources) to have the final piece of > software. Very nice with the advantages that comes with this type of > installation, but, what about a big applications like Gnome, OpenOffice and > so on. I can't try ports because I can't have a fast/long connection for > downloads (due to some restrictions on my country) so I always install via > packages, and it takes a while, well a little bit. So what I am asking if > is anyone has test a Gnome, OpenOffice.org, or any other big installations > via ports (say in a Pentium 4 2.8GHz HT with 512Mb RAM) can tell me the > elapsed time ??? Just curious...thanks in advance. I don't know about Gnome, but the last time I built OpenOffice from a port, it took several hours and I had to respond to some prompts and also get the JDK license piece from SUN (instructions are provided). The install from ports did not have to stay connected constantly all that time. It jumps on the net and grabs what it needs and then goes about building. My connection is 100 Mb here in the lab, but I don't know for sure what it is to the outside world - pretty fast though. ////jerry > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 00:33:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3381716A504 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:33:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tfcheng@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F9443D3F for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:31:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tfcheng@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so310317uge for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:32:35 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=tbUOGsjIGabfGBJhtYwtjgFl/e1uFbDJQfPtBZQuoABVuNHyd5VeUPzYBEY/RoWdc5tj6d1TvZSH7eumiqMor46JWlqjE7kqR9Lqqm7Mo5s8x4KDWf8QSTDf/adhh54fSB7JZcTqJsR8szS7uw6sWL31t3i8Of9Nd7ENXVBfq/0= Received: by 10.78.193.19 with SMTP id q19mr318261huf.1166056354798; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:32:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.160.4 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:32:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:32:34 -0500 From: "Tsu-Fan Cheng" To: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: mkxvcd not working due to floating point expression of movie length identification from mplayer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:33:17 -0000 hi ... i need to use mkxvcd script to create movies, but it gave me error messages. After some debugging I found out it's because (I guess) that mplayer use floating point expression instead of integer when identifying the length of the movie, like 208.15 or something. Anyway, when mkxvcd trying to decide how many hours this movie has by code: HOURS=$[quant/3600], which quant means the length, the script can't handle it and exit. The script is written in Bash, and I am not so much of a expert, can someone suggest me the next step?? much appreciated!! TFC From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 00:39:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA9216A4C2 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:39:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (pool-71-245-104-192.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [71.245.104.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523F143D4C for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:37:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (localhost.home.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBE0dI2q030634 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:39:18 -0800 Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id kBE0dIN3030631 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:39:18 -0800 Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id AAA14550; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:37:42 GMT Message-Id: <200612140037.AAA14550@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:27:26 EST." <20061213232726.GA61149@xor.obsecurity.org> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:37:42 +0000 From: Dieter Subject: Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:39:50 -0000 > > Is Giant the only mutex/lock that could be a bottleneck across disks? > > The only one I can think of that is generic. One would have to do > more extensive profiling and diagnosis to try and figure out what is > wrong with your system. Suggestions of what to look at would be welcome. > The only explanation that seems to fit is that it's something to do > with your particular hardware (i.e. driver issue), since it's > certainly not a problem on general configurations. > > I know that many people have bad things to say about nforce chipsets, > although I dont know if your particular problem has been reported > before. Could APIC have anything to do with this? It is currently turned off in firmware. Today I experimented with vfs.hirunningspace. If I crank it up, I get better total write speed with multiple drives doing dd from /dev/zero to files on disks. But it doesn't help my real applications, and in fact appears to hurt them. I have also discovered that my program that reads from Ethernet and does non-blocking writes to stdout which get redirected to a disk file isn't benefiting as much as it should from the large circular buffer. The buffer should be enough to hold 4.5-5 minutes worth of data, and is mlock(2)'d into memory. I can read from four disks at once without hurting the Ethernet transfer. But a dd from /dev/zero writing to a different disk that takes less than 3 seconds interferes with the Ethernet transfer. The fcntl(1, O_NONBLOCK); isn't failing, and the write() isn't returning -1/EAGAIN. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 00:58:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2EBC16A4AB for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:58:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D3E43CD2 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:56:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.141]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBE0wFDR005268 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:58:15 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBE0wEIQ022214 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:58:15 -0800 Message-ID: <4580A1AB.8070902@u.washington.edu> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:58:19 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2006.12.13.164433 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: mkxvcd not working due to floating point expression of movie length identification from mplayer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:58:36 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: > hi ... > i need to use mkxvcd script to create movies, but it gave me error > messages. After some debugging I found out it's because (I guess) that > mplayer use floating point expression instead of integer when identifying > the length of the movie, like 208.15 or something. Anyway, when mkxvcd > trying to decide how many hours this movie has by code: > HOURS=$[quant/3600], which quant means the length, > the script can't handle it and exit. > The script is written in Bash, and I am not so much of a expert, can > someone > suggest me the next step?? much appreciated!! > > > TFC Answer about whether or not floating point arithmetic is possible in bash (from ): Caution Bash does not understand floating point arithmetic. It treats numbers containing a decimal point as strings. Why not... A. Brute force the math a bit with Bash? 1. Divide the integer portion. 2. Subtract the quotient. 3. Take the decimal remainder and multiply it by 100 (or 1000 or whatever the max precision is for the number), and use that as your decimal value B. Program your solution using a different method / language? It's quite simple to accomplish this using either Perl or C. - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFgKGrEnKyINQw/HARAqyGAKCipeiM62ACpCEIjrYrZJqT0tdK1gCeJVRk FrMS1VUcScc000QIc1xPsaU= =ZCQS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 01:03:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1903F16A4D0 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:03:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drumslayer2@yahoo.com) Received: from web34502.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web34502.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.178.168]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9865D43CAD for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:59:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drumslayer2@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 29820 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Dec 2006 01:01:25 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=e0tAu4g8ZKtbzygMujXF28iuSWSo/b3aqZ0yNeg68TySDA0sFoGxbgkkX/MaM4pjRywmlvWOXOa69dpQ9Obea6QMZinMjgWcqk129FZHedi+OL7tBvGHQvG7i6KFUOiGCHucRD0REo3veNYRPndysbp7l4NY4c9e+t+59eUGM44= ; Message-ID: <20061214010124.29818.qmail@web34502.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: BspCq.cVM1mGek_3Ruquiz4_Ce9L.yygrUZQ4yiBclMaoUZMnfky2gluG1Z1lqiFO.UHHCgZhli7vrpMkqGoW2N9ys2GQdWFlI9hlpj07IXJPFVHR4j9Lg-- Received: from [67.112.21.27] by web34502.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:01:24 PST Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:01:24 -0800 (PST) From: "N. Harrington" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: How does one bond two interfaces together to share bandwidth? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:03:16 -0000 I am trying to figure out how to bond or combine 2 interfaces together. Such that they each share traffic. I have tried one way, however when I use it I seem to have an odd broadcast occuring on my switch. Such that I am seeing incoming traffic hit some other ports on the switch. Can someone confirm if I am doing it correctly? Perhaps I have a switch issue? Do I also need to bond the ports together on the switch? Sadly the switch they are connected to does not support port bonding. Does that matter? I have not seen any mention of that being required. I have: /usr/sbin/ngctl -f- <<-SEQ mkpeer fec dummy fec msg fec0: add_iface "em0" msg fec0: add_iface "em1" msg fec0: set_mode_inet SEQ Thanks for any help! Nicole The Large Print Giveth And The Small Print Taketh Away -- Anon ____________________________________________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 01:04:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A440516A4D8 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:04:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arminius@pubbox.net) Received: from pubbox.net (pubbox.net [81.169.167.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B55D443DF1 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:01:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arminius@pubbox.net) Received: from e180095077.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.180.95.77] helo=pubbox.net) by pubbox.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Guf03-0003H7-8c; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:03:03 +0100 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:03:19 +0100 From: Armin Arh To: Tuareg Message-ID: <20061214010319.GB686@pubbox.net> References: <20061206034909.27125.qmail@web37214.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200612131447.28141.lane@joeandlane.com> <7a4a15bd0612131436j7d289ba8h989ba4400b72a3ad@mail.gmail.com> <200612131657.18164.lane@joeandlane.com> <7a4a15bd0612131522t2942b44bo4412d1e16c6ed2e6@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7a4a15bd0612131522t2942b44bo4412d1e16c6ed2e6@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: arminius@pubbox.net Cc: Lane , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:04:48 -0000 On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 05:22:41PM -0600, Tuareg wrote: > Dec 13 00:00:00 myhost newsyslog[41433]: logfile turned over > Dec 13 00:00:02 myhost sendmail[41485]: gethostbyaddr(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) > failed: 1 > Dec 13 00:00:02 myhost sendmail[41485]: kBD602j41485: from=root, size=137, > class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=< > 200612130600.kBD602j41485@server.FreeBSD.4.6-RELEASE>, relay=root@localhost > Dec 13 00:00:03 myhost sendmail[41488]: kBD602j41485: to= > [...] clearly sendmail is running, but not as a daemon. It gets called for every single mail by some other process running as root. You suspect squid to do so? (unlikely, why should a webcache send emails...) Well, then run squid as another user and watch the logs, should be "from=squiduser" then... The problem with too much root- processes is, you can't tell which one is going mad. enjoy, Armin -- PUBBOX Postmaster + spam-killer. Free email addresses at http://pubbox.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 01:10:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D60C16A4D0 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:10:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3802143CA8 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:09:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin05-en2 [10.13.10.150]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout04/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kBE18gHv019158; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:08:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from [17.214.13.96] (a17-214-13-96.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin05/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kBE18ded011030; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:08:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20061214010124.29818.qmail@web34502.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20061214010124.29818.qmail@web34502.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <168E6D20-A6E1-458B-A1A5-80BAFD20598F@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:08:38 -0800 To: "N. Harrington" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-scanned: yes Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How does one bond two interfaces together to share bandwidth? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:10:53 -0000 On Dec 13, 2006, at 5:01 PM, N. Harrington wrote: > I have tried one way, however when I use it I seem to > have an odd broadcast occuring on my switch. Such that > I am seeing incoming traffic hit some other ports on > the switch. Can someone confirm if I am doing it > correctly? Perhaps I have a switch issue? > Do I also need to bond the ports together on the > switch? Yes, the switch would need to support Cisco's FEC protocol if you want to use ng_fec with it. > Sadly the switch they are connected to does > not support port bonding. Does that matter? Yep. In many cases, a single 100Mbs link does just fine, but if you need more bandwidth, you can pick up a gigabit NIC nowadays for not much. Picking up a GB-capable switch is more expensive, but perhaps your existing switch might have one or a couple of GB ports... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 01:13:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A3716A415 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:13:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ACAF43CBE for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:11:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.6/8.13.8) id kBE1DO8m095083; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:13:24 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:13:24 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: "N. Harrington" Message-ID: <20061214011324.GF79418@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20061214010124.29818.qmail@web34502.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061214010124.29818.qmail@web34502.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How does one bond two interfaces together to share bandwidth? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:13:42 -0000 In the last episode (Dec 13), N. Harrington said: > I am trying to figure out how to bond or combine 2 interfaces > together. Such that they each share traffic. > > I have tried one way, however when I use it I seem to have an odd > broadcast occuring on my switch. Such that I am seeing incoming > traffic hit some other ports on the switch. Can someone confirm if I > am doing it correctly? Perhaps I have a switch issue? Do I also need > to bond the ports together on the switch? Sadly the switch they are > connected to does not support port bonding. Does that matter? I have > not seen any mention of that being required. If the remote switch doesn't support it, only outgoing traffic will be split across both ports. Incoming traffic will probably come in on the first port that came up, or the switch may decide that there's a routing loop (or other misconfiguration) because the same MAC address is seen on both ports, and disable one of the ports (or even both). Most managed switches should support it; they may call it trunking. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 01:23:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0B716A407 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:23:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B0A43E4B for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:19:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A6A1A3C1C; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:20:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7C76E5138F; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:20:35 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:20:35 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dieter Message-ID: <20061214012035.GA62554@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20061213232726.GA61149@xor.obsecurity.org> <200612140037.AAA14550@sopwith.solgatos.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200612140037.AAA14550@sopwith.solgatos.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:23:46 -0000 --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 04:37:42PM +0000, Dieter wrote: > > > Is Giant the only mutex/lock that could be a bottleneck across disks? > >=20 > > The only one I can think of that is generic. One would have to do > > more extensive profiling and diagnosis to try and figure out what is > > wrong with your system. >=20 > Suggestions of what to look at would be welcome. Mutex profiling would show if there is a mutex somehow getting in the way of your I/O (e.g. if Giant is somehow being forced). I dont think it would show anything though. You can try to study interrupt issues (e.g. look for an interrupt storm during I/O) with vmstat -i. Other than that you'd probably have to get your hands dirtier in the code. > > The only explanation that seems to fit is that it's something to do > > with your particular hardware (i.e. driver issue), since it's > > certainly not a problem on general configurations. > >=20 > > I know that many people have bad things to say about nforce chipsets, > > although I dont know if your particular problem has been reported > > before. >=20 > Could APIC have anything to do with this? It is currently turned off in > firmware. Problems with interrupt delivery could certainly be relevant. > Today I experimented with vfs.hirunningspace. If I crank it up, I get > better total write speed with multiple drives doing dd from /dev/zero > to files on disks. But it doesn't help my real applications, and > in fact appears to hurt them. Yes, I don't expect there are any viable high-level workarounds for this issue at a lower layer. Kris --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFgKbiWry0BWjoQKURAjUxAKCEkTc17uF19pOkUbQOghWASCkkygCfYLHT NqMrzYDBtv/q8Ujqt64xn/o= =WTDV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 01:23:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2393D16A51A for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:23:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [63.240.77.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25AF43D6B for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:19:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from gimpy (c-24-118-186-172.hsd1.mn.comcast.net[24.118.186.172]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2006121401210101300oeurhe>; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:21:01 +0000 From: Josh Paetzel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:20:54 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061214010124.29818.qmail@web34502.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <168E6D20-A6E1-458B-A1A5-80BAFD20598F@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <168E6D20-A6E1-458B-A1A5-80BAFD20598F@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612131920.54630.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: "N. Harrington" Subject: Re: How does one bond two interfaces together to share bandwidth? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:23:51 -0000 On Wednesday 13 December 2006 19:08, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Dec 13, 2006, at 5:01 PM, N. Harrington wrote: > > I have tried one way, however when I use it I seem to > > have an odd broadcast occuring on my switch. Such that > > I am seeing incoming traffic hit some other ports on > > the switch. Can someone confirm if I am doing it > > correctly? Perhaps I have a switch issue? > > Do I also need to bond the ports together on the > > switch? > > Yes, the switch would need to support Cisco's FEC protocol if you > want to use ng_fec with it. > > > Sadly the switch they are connected to does > > not support port bonding. Does that matter? > > Yep. In many cases, a single 100Mbs link does just fine, but if > you need more bandwidth, you can pick up a gigabit NIC nowadays for > not much. Picking up a GB-capable switch is more expensive, but > perhaps your existing switch might have one or a couple of GB > ports... Maybe ng_one2many would be of some use depending on the exact situation. -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 01:25:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6487816A4D0 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:25:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A474143D31 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:20:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so119266ana for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:21:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.48.7 with SMTP id v7mr421282anv.1166059317454; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:21:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d12sm1750705and.2006.12.13.17.21.56; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:21:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 040C4B9B5; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:21:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (boss.seibercom.net [192.168.0.4]) (Authenticated sender: gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E90B9AA; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:21:53 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:22:09 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: User Questions Organization: Seibercom.NET In-Reply-To: <17489c7a0612131526v67d74964xb2136b4515dff29b@mail.gmail.com> References: <200612131657.18164.lane@joeandlane.com> <17489c7a0612131526v67d74964xb2136b4515dff29b@mail.gmail.com> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20061213201849.C225.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.29 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: User Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:25:00 -0000 On Wednesday December 13, 2006 at 06:26:58 (PM) Chad Gross wrote: > On 12/13/06, Lane wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 13 December 2006 16:36, Tuareg wrote: > > > On 12/13/06, Lane wrote: > > > > Tuareg, > > > > > > > > Post /etc/rc.conf from one of the servers that does what you want and > > > > that should lead us to what mta is handling email. > > > > > > cat /etc/rc.conf > > > > > > ### Network daemon (miscellaneous) & NFS options: ### > > > sendmail_enable="NONE" # Run the sendmail daemon (or NO). > > > cron_enable="YES" # Run the periodic job daemon. > > > portmap_enable="NO" # Run the portmapper service (or NO). > > > usbd_enable="NO" > > > sshd_enable="YES" > > > tcp_drop_synfin="YES" > > > tcp_restrict_rst="YES" > > > syslogd_enable="YES" # Run syslog daemon (or NO). > > > syslogd_flags="-s -s" # Flags to syslogd (if enabled). > > > > > > > Also, please post a copy of > > > > > > > > ls -al /usr/local/etc/rc.d > > > > > > > > from that same working server, just in case there is a custom script > > > > starting > > > > the mta. > > > > > > > > lane > > > > > > ls -al /usr/local/etc/rc.d > > > total 10 > > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Jan 23 2003 . > > > drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 512 Oct 30 18:06 .. > > > -rwxr--r-- 1 root wheel 624 Jan 14 2003 squid.sh > > > > > > And that's all. > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Tuareg, > > > > Yours is a mystery. > > > > Let's see the output of > > > > tail -200 /var/log/maillog > > > > from the working machine. > > > > Clearly there is no mta being started on boot. But I'm not familiar > > enough > > with squid to say for sure that it is not the daemon in question. It may > > be > > that squid is configurable so that it could be delivering the log > > messages. > > > > I'll make it and see what I can see. > > > > In the mean time, if anyone else has some ready experience to say for > > certain > > that this is probably what's happening, then jump right in. > > > > lane > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > You need something to be able to send emails to mail servers. Either a MUA > which is capable of doing so (of which mail(8) is not) or an MTA locally. > > Are you sure you didn't follow these instructions on the other servers: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/outgoing-only.html You need to check out this URL: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mail-changingmta.html Also, Sendmail is invoked from the /etc/defaults/rc.conf file. You over ride it in the /etc/rc.conf file. In FreeBSD 5.0, SENDMAIL_ENABLE="NONE" is not the proper way to disable Sendmail. Check out the above URL for further information. -- Gerard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 01:50:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8531416A407 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:50:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from business.oriented@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 424D543DFA for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:42:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from business.oriented@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so310310wxc for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:43:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=r8yMb9HvJkCXKNRQweNjvz0YXuNwRcMs9J8xfbnMcyEMWr3OYXeK/XYe0liFKn9wpScn39658XNJFIer/s+g0Y6JJ1lDeLgVDUCB8KeJlhuc0yZCetPsafQunJUUDsU2KHESkPQYViOcNzv2d5DJJYRXT8e4IFHaqiCES2pV/90= Received: by 10.70.40.1 with SMTP id n1mr549725wxn.1166060590494; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:43:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from bloodlust ( [69.60.116.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i37sm1945092wxd.2006.12.13.17.43.05; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:43:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <004701c71f21$1ecb4bd0$4fd3dcc9@bloodlust> From: "Ne'Bahn" To: Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:08:34 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Cc: UNIX - questions Subject: Re: Qlogic QLA2200G & Freebsd 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:50:50 -0000 See the Release Information http://www.freebsd.org/releases/index.html; you can search in the supported hardware list for your card or similar... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 01:57:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99DB716A5C7 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:57:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CEF243CB0 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:52:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so185678nzh for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:54:12 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=SotFN94NYsPOoFDy3bpuTCXGjeaCw73j+HcHM3wsl/m9KAgJrL2bAbBN0K21K7x+2V++wEpkxtzuQAi/pSHtov5MXxUHWT5r/5pKw4jbEZm6qGgu6uabIzU7iFq60KUXUghUDsy2Vn7T2WazGVM5qAHb2oUE69Sf62YFM3yBPCs= Received: by 10.64.185.7 with SMTP id i7mr462346qbf.1166061252546; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:54:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.75.14 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:54:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <17489c7a0612131754j727ac2a3n854e2313396e93c6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:54:12 -0500 From: "Chad Gross" To: Ne'Bahn In-Reply-To: <002001c71f12$f36c4560$71d3dcc9@bloodlust> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <002001c71f12$f36c4560$71d3dcc9@bloodlust> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: UNIX - questions Subject: Re: Install via ports... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:57:31 -0000 On 12/13/06, Ne'Bahn wrote: > > Hi list, I've read the handbook for ports, basically (if I understand) > ports > are files that brings information (location, dependencies) to the system > to > compile a series of files (sources) to have the final piece of software. > Very nice with the advantages that comes with this type of installation, > but, what about a big applications like Gnome, OpenOffice and so on. I > can't > try ports because I can't have a fast/long connection for downloads (due > to > some restrictions on my country) so I always install via packages, and it > takes a while, well a little bit. So what I am asking if is anyone has > test > a Gnome, OpenOffice.org, or any other big installations via ports (say in > a > Pentium 4 2.8GHz HT with 512Mb RAM) can tell me the elapsed time ??? Just > curious...thanks in advance. I have a P4 2.8 w/ 1G RAM and it takes hours to compile OpenOffice and around 9GB of hdd space. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 02:03:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1188316A47B for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:03:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Matthew_Northcott@Dell.com) Received: from ausc60pc101.us.dell.com (ausc60pc101.us.dell.com [143.166.85.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BCF43CA6 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:01:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Matthew_Northcott@Dell.com) DomainKey-Signature: s=smtpout; d=dell.com; c=nofws; q=dns; b=jZyLZgUU/1YZ0PW8cfJnWubqComJTRiszPhQs2kjAUEdt0iX+omOLPwp5gB5XcvpQpQHdcpj8QrEQdXwodYqr5W+oDbxSfC7q4Psvt1Fdhpudm1fksIpnXoFazfLXpBO; Received: from ausx3bpc104.aus.amer.dell.com ([10.30.101.54]) by ausc60pc101.us.dell.com with ESMTP; 13 Dec 2006 20:03:31 -0600 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.12,165,1165212000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="159887187:sNHT49750785" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:03:30 -0600 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Gateway MX3215 laptop running fbsd 6.1 current, no sound. Thread-Index: AccfI1D5l21TfKlDQTuQzFaB7eYFRgAAKTKg From: To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Dec 2006 02:03:31.0144 (UTC) FILETIME=[0DA35480:01C71F24] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Gateway MX3215 laptop running fbsd 6.1 current, no sound. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:03:33 -0000 Greetings everyone,=20 =20 I have been hacking at this freebsd install for over 3 weeks now. Got everything working perfectly but sound. Been playing with it for awhile and have tried all of the config options i could imagine. Now gateway doesnt shed to much light on the soundcard/chipset thats in this system. it does tell me these two bits of info.=20 Chipset: Via VN800=20 Audio: AC '97 2.3 Compliant Audio=20 Built-in Speakers=20 So i tried native drivers, but no go. So i then downloaded and got OSS installed ( latest version from the website) it does see my sound card as VIA VT8233/8235/8237. But when I go to play sound eaither ussing osstest or an application like xmms the system thinks it's playing to the sound out, but i get no sound from the speakers. Adjusted volume using ossxmix, but to no avail. Anyone ever ran into anyhting like this or is using this same system? Any help would be much appreciated. =20 =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 02:12:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C623116A416 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:12:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drumslayer2@yahoo.com) Received: from web34506.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web34506.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.178.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E516043CA3 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:11:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drumslayer2@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 34740 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Dec 2006 02:12:36 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=B6KcRDkqadwiZS8SO/zellIkt8W24ayD/yCXyKKwfjab/1rj9E3Qmo0PPvj2JCnD9xcNV0VcKD6fta9uEFcVNh51WEsctjNuBVBZNL38cAsIlT31td2c3JMYkjMhz/dRAZjaufTyvAzCD6pf+65lQT5VoNhkuRlgKGLMLs7yuWI=; X-YMail-OSG: uvhz5R0VM1mE_ucBU88y4GYtOX4gzMlMKm9.Z9MXvkms.vFV6InMsIAmEWCuH94_RR.BTNli49su5XsYCZZFFXVy.5xCSucGAM_qFipGrLZCYbgmwwbLashzOyzHvVWgB32vk8ruUpC0u.hIXBR5q6rucg035iopdtw- Received: from [67.112.21.27] by web34506.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:12:36 PST Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:12:36 -0800 (PST) From: "N. Harrington" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <632385.16581.qm@web34506.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Subject: How does one route traffic to always go in and out via the same port/ip? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:12:37 -0000 Fron a previous post I found I cannot solve my problem via port bonding since I am stuck with a switch that does not support Port bonding or trunking, I would like to then try to setup various interfaces with various IP's to help balance the traffic. Basicly as normal, assign say: ifconfig em0 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 (switch port1) & ifconfig em1 192.168.1.11 netmask 255.255.255.0(switch port2) & ifconfig em2 192.168.1.12 netmask 255.255.255.0 (switch port3) However if I do this, I get arp complaints because of being on the same network. Now I can stop the arp complaints via setting the below in sysctl.conf net.link.ether.inet.log_arp_movements=0 net.link.ether.inet.log_arp_wrong_iface=0 But, the problem I really have if that all the outbound traffic, goes back out the first port to the default gateway. I have tried everything I could think of, but I cannot figure out how to make sure that traffic that comes in via a particular port, will go back out that port. I am running a load balancing program on this machine. Each IP address would then correspond to an aggrigate of servers that would send traffic back to the machine in response to a request passed to it. However all the responses to the clients, regardless of which IP they came in on, are being sent back via the first port instead of the port/ip they came in on. Any assitance on how to bind an ip and gateway to a port much appreciatted! Sorry if my explanantion sucks. Feel free to ask for more info. Thanks!! They really push this program for running on linux. They offer it for FreeBSD but don't support it as much. I would really like to solve this. Otherwise all of our BSD servers will show up as linux servers if they have to be behind a linux based server. Nicole The Large Print Giveth And The Small Print Taketh Away -- Anon ____________________________________________________________________________________ Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 02:39:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7C916A40F for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:39:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC4043CA3 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:38:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 13 Dec 2006 21:39:38 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id MQT76246; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:39:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-203-219.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.203.219]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 13 Dec 2006 21:39:34 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.12,165,1165208400"; d="scan'208"; a="332788550:sNHT39817492" From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17792.47354.215083.610430@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:37:46 -0500 To: UNIX - questions In-Reply-To: <17489c7a0612131754j727ac2a3n854e2313396e93c6@mail.gmail.com> References: <002001c71f12$f36c4560$71d3dcc9@bloodlust> <17489c7a0612131754j727ac2a3n854e2313396e93c6@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Status: score=42/50, host=mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=suspect(7), refid=str=0001.0A090207.4580B82E.0076,ss=2,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.121/2006-09-27 Subject: Re: Install via ports... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:39:40 -0000 Chad Gross writes: > > So what I am asking if is anyone has > >test a Gnome, OpenOffice.org, or any other big installations > >via ports (say in a Pentium 4 2.8GHz HT with 512Mb RAM) can tell > >me the elapsed time ??? Just curious...thanks in advance. > > I have a P4 2.8 w/ 1G RAM and it takes hours to compile OpenOffice and > around 9GB of hdd space. P4/2.26G; 512 mb. I allocate 24 hours, rarely takes more than 20, to build OpenOffice. Uses 6-7G of disk. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 02:41:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6743616A407; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:41:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dayton@brooklyn.cuny.edu) Received: from outbound.mailhop.org (outbound.mailhop.org [63.208.196.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B5843CA5; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:40:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dayton@brooklyn.cuny.edu) Received: from client17.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu ([146.245.249.227] helo=hurt.localhost) by outbound.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GugXR-000LP0-Ve; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:41:38 -0500 Received: from hurt.localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hurt.localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id A800F171D8; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:41:34 -0500 (EST) X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 146.245.249.227 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.mailhop.org/outbound/abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: theclones Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:41:34 -0500 Message-ID: From: dayton@brooklyn.cuny.edu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20061213232259.2190816A621@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20061213232259.2190816A621@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 158, Issue 10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:41:41 -0000 I am glad to recommend Roman. I have worked with Roman for more than 4 years as a student in class, on independent projects, and now as his Masters thesis advisor. I'll begin with a little background. Each Spring I teach a course called "System Administration". I lecture on operating systems, file systems, networks, and hardware. But most significantly we spend 3 or more hours per week in a laboratory with networked computers on which the students (1 or 2 per machine) perform various system and network administrative tasks. Most students find the experience refreshing because of the unfettered access they are given to the machines and the network in the labs. Typically, a few students each year approach me at the end of the term seeking additional projects or independent study in the lab. In the Spring of 2002, Roman took the course doing well and getting an A. As the term ended, Roman and another student, asked about possible projects. We decided on changing one of the major projects in the system administration course. This involved development of a tool for specifying installation parameteters for FreeBSD and then performing the installation. They worked hard on this project and ended with a working tool. At the end of the Spring 2003 term, Roman and another student, Aleks, asked about possible projects. They were particularly interested in the inner workings of the operating system. After some discussion we decided on that they would investigate the Unix Network File System (NFS) to see if it was appropriate for a project I've been thinking of for some time. They had no previous experience with programs at this level. They set to work, consulting with me as needed and by the the end of the summer were working deep within the NFS code. In the end, they demonstrated convincingly that NFS would not work as I had hoped. That that particular avenue was cut off, was disappointing to me, but does not, of course, reflect negatively on their work or effort. Their work was outstanding. Roman and Aleks worked worked very hard and productively together. This is why I must speak of both. I have found that in group projects, usually one student dominates the group both intellectually and in effort. This can sometimes make it difficult when it comes time to evaluate the individual contribution and effort. With Roman and Aleks, there is no such problem. Each of them worked extremely hard and contributed significantly to the project and they both deserve full marks for the outstanding work. I can say, though, that Roman has emerged as the leader in the group. In addition, Roman, is usually the first to understand new concepts and their significance. In the Fall of 2003, I received new computers and new networking equipment for the lab. Roman and Aleks, along with a third student, took on the task of setting up the new equipment. This is of great value to me and demonstrates their commitment and effort. Furthermore, they have solved a longstanding problem within the lab. Namely that I have always encouraged other faculty to make use of the lab for their classes, the nature of the system administration course presented a problem. Several times each term some students will inadvertently wipe out the disk on their system or get their system in such a state that starting from a clean disk is the best alternative. This, of course, does not make for a stable situation for other users of the lab. Further complicating matters is that we want to support three different operating systems on the machines. In addition to setting up the lab this last Fall, Roman and Aleks, developed a scheme to manage this. Basically, any of the operating systems can be restored on any of the computers within five to ten minutes. Thus, regardless of what one of my students might do to the software on a system, the computer can be made ready for a different class in short order. The motivation for this effort was mostly theirs and they spent many hours experimenting and struggling to develop it. It is an other outstanding effort. Over the last 3 months, Roman has been working on his Masters thesis with me. This project involves modifying the kernel of the FreeBSD operating system (FreeBSD is a version of Unix). Roman is making steady progress on this project. I have worked with Roman quite a bit over the these years. He has had remarkable development in his skills, knowledge, and confidence. He is personally pleasant. He has been very responsible in all regards. I find it hard to speak too highly of him. I have taught well over a thousand students both undergraduate and graduate. I have worked with several dozen on independent projects and theses. Of these, only a handful have really stood out. Roman is one of these, well within the top 5% of the students I've known. I have no doubt that he will do well in your company. Sincerely, Dayton Clark Dayton Clark CIS Department dayton@brooklyn.cuny.edu Brooklyn College/CUNY 718.951.5000 x2045 Brooklyn, New York 11210 718.951.4842 (fax) >>>>> "David" == David Grimsby writes: David> Hi, My name is David Grimsby and I'm looking to hire Roman David> Makogon, and was hoping you could provide a David> reference. Specifically could you answer some questions; David> What is your relationship to Roman? David> Can you rate his technical skills? David> If you had the chance to hire him would you? David> Anything else you can tell me about him would be great. David> Thanks for your time, David> Dave 650-569-7516 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 03:09:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3206116A40F for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:09:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meilinxiaoxue@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC06343CA3 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:07:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from meilinxiaoxue@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so190370pyh for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:09:10 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:x-mailer:reply-to:x-priority:message-id:to:subject:resent-from:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=r1yO7cHWUz+JlFaNl89ICj3O+tDUy6jvXllBHfQ2OYWlr3GrxaPYZwm5kEb3qKf0W6QAJo0o+dNRB+qgtVaiFA3m/0WR0tYt0NE/Rus/ug7JGgPtP5n8gDcEQb2A0qpLXl53KszHbgSHT0J+yJArJVi52oKn78cAe19NF2B7fek= Received: by 10.35.57.5 with SMTP id j5mr735783pyk.1166065750302; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:09:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?122.198.12.172? ( [122.198.12.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 38sm5373699nzk.2006.12.13.19.09.09; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:09:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:09:08 +0800 From: meilin X-Mailer: SecureBat! Lite (v2.10.02) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <119549105.20061214110908@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Resent-from: meilin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-Id: <20061214030738.AC06343CA3@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:07:38 +0000 (GMT) Subject: where is the full compile option for sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: meilin List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:09:12 -0000 hi all: The original sendmail's compile option is configured by m4,the one distribute with FreeBSD has tripped out some files and can not configure as the usual way,I have man make.conf,however, just find several items for sendmail and a few instructions. I want to know how to fully control the compile option while just do not install sendmail from a original source package? thx very much -- meilin mailto:meilinxiaoxue@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 04:49:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722AC16A5EC for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 04:49:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF4A43C9F for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 04:47:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GuiWh-0000Nh-UJ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:49:00 -0500 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost.localnet.local [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kBE4paek036148 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:51:36 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id kBE4padH036147 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:51:36 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:51:36 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061206034909.27125.qmail@web37214.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <7a4a15bd0612131522t2942b44bo4412d1e16c6ed2e6@mail.gmail.com> <200612131733.32763.lane@joeandlane.com> In-Reply-To: <200612131733.32763.lane@joeandlane.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612132251.36352.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79d79e8f0f955abd55d2707dc27b4643ba350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 04:49:08 -0000 Tuareg, I can't find the name of the quy who straightened me out on the fuction of squid, but kudo's to him. Clearly squid is not the culprit. But I've done some eyeballing on /usr/sbin/periodic, and I think maybe it is the culprit. First lets have a look at your /etc/crontab file. Specifically we are interested in the lines which contain the term "periodic" If these lines include parameters, which are passed to /usr/sbin/periodic, then they may be the reason for your periodic emails being sent WITHOUT sendmail being enabled by the normal boot process. Take a look at /usr/sbin/periodic. Note that it uses values in /etc/defaults/periodic.conf as well as any override variables in /etc/rc.conf. It could also be overridden in other ways such as by defining the value "source_periodic_confs_defined" and "periodic_conf_files" but this should have already showed up in /etc/rc.conf. While you are examining /usr/sbin/periodic, look for the term "output" In my copy of that script there is a comment that looks like: #Where's our output going? Then there is a "case" block: case "$output" in /*) pipe="cat >>$output";; "") pipe=cat;; *) pipe="mail -s '$host ${arg##*/} run output' $output";; esac If your predecessor had modified this script or, perhaps overridden it using /etc/defaults/periodic.conf, then he may have either changed the *) default case, or supplied parameters from /etc/crontab (or /etc/defaults/periodic.conf) which could invoke sendmail directly. If he used override variables, then he would probably also have added a case for ) pipe="sendmail - " This would account for sendmail being completely disabled in /etc/rc.conf AND for the messages being sent out via sendmail. However, as I read it, the behaviour you have reported would only occur if /usr/sbin/periodic was actually modified, as the use of the "$output" variables does NOT seem to allow for invocation of sendmail directly. And I don't believe that "mail" can force invocation of sendmail (although I may be wrong, as the man page does imply that mail will use any means available to get the message out). If this is the case (i.e. if "mail" is invoking sendmail directly) you could check it by trying to send mail from the command line on one of the servers that actually does what you want it to do. If it works, and if there are NO modifications to /usr/sbin/periodic or override defaults in /etc/defaults/periodic.conf, then it will be safe to assume that this "feature" has been properly quashed in 6.x. You would then need to follow the procedures for setting up sendmail for outgoing-only, as many have already recommended. In any case, the behaviour you desire would only work properly by making the appropriate changes to /etc/mail/.mc, (i.e. SMART_HOST and/or HUB settings), and then running "make install" in /etc/mail. (And this is always going to be the case where sendmail is concerned) I hope this information leads you to a resolution, as it has been a great learning experience for me ... but my brain hurts :) lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 05:14:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A6416A40F for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 05:14:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexa@silicom.co.il) Received: from mail.qos.net.il (mail.qos.net.il [80.74.96.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A53F43CA1 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 05:13:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alexa@silicom.co.il) Received: from Alex (unknown [80.74.105.218]) by mail.qos.net.il (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F0C7C8029 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:15:41 +0200 (IST) From: "Alex Aronson" To: Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:13:09 +0200 Message-ID: <003401c71f3e$8c8d4390$0100a8c0@Alex> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Importance: Normal Subject: FreeBSD: driver for ssl hardware accelerator board based on broadcom bcm5825, bcm5862 chips X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 05:14:39 -0000 Hello, I am working on FreeBSD driver for bcm5825 (5862) based board. Would you please help me. First of all I tried to work with bcm5820 based board. I installed FreeBSD 6.1 and load ubsec module: kldload ubsec In dmesg I saw that module recognized board (ubsec0: Broadcom 5820), crypto module was also loaded. After that I run openssl test (openssl version 0.9.7e-p1 25 Oct 2004) openssl speed rsa1024 -engine ubsec can't use that engine 830:error:2507006C:DSO support routines:DSO_load:functionality not supported:/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/dso/d so_lib.c:239: 830:error:84069067:ubsec engine:UBSEC_INIT:dso failure:/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/engine/ hw_ubsec.c:390: 830:error:260B806D:engine routines:ENGINE_TABLE_REGISTER:init failed:/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/engine/e ng_table.c:182: What am I missing? There is no libubsec.so in the system. Any help will be appreciated. Alex Aronson Silicom Ltd. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 06:43:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD8C16A40F for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:43:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6F5B43CB0 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:41:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBE6glU1069007; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:42:48 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk from=m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk; sender-id=permerror; spf=permerror X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk kBE6glU1069007 Message-ID: <4580F261.7050500@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:42:41 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: brian merrell References: <20061213222136.623967AE9F@ws5-10.us4.outblaze.com> In-Reply-To: <20061213222136.623967AE9F@ws5-10.us4.outblaze.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF833C3BFB9A0D8AC8C38E60A" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:42:58 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/2329/Thu Dec 14 03:02:58 2006 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_POLICY_TESTING,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: javaws X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:43:05 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF833C3BFB9A0D8AC8C38E60A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable brian merrell wrote: > Thanks for your response Matthew. This has been my experience: >=20 > [root@cobweb /usr/ports/java/javavmwrapper]# make install clean > (installs OK) > [root@cobweb /usr/ports/java/diablo-jdk15]# make install clean > (installs OK) > [root@cobweb /home/bean]# find / -name javaws > [root@cobweb /home/bean]# find / -name *javaws* > /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/man/man1/javaws.1 >=20 > Am I missing something? Apparently something is up the creek on your installation. However you should be able to fix it. The javavmwrapper port should create symbolic links in /usr/local/bin for all of the generally available java executables. It does that by running 'checkvms' at install time. You could try just running that=20 by hand and see if it generates the correct output. This is the sort of thing you should see after doing that: happy-idiot-talk:/usr/local/bin:% ls -l | grep javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 ControlPanel@ -> /usr/loc= al/bin/javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 HtmlConverter@ -> /usr/lo= cal/bin/javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 appletviewer@ -> /usr/loc= al/bin/javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 apt@ -> /usr/local/bin/ja= vavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Aug 1 14:08 checkvms@ -> /usr/local/b= in/javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 extcheck@ -> /usr/local/b= in/javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 idlj@ -> /usr/local/bin/j= avavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 jar@ -> /usr/local/bin/ja= vavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 jarsigner@ -> /usr/local/= bin/javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 java@ -> /usr/local/bin/j= avavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 java-rmi.cgi@ -> /usr/loc= al/bin/javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 java_vm@ -> /usr/local/bi= n/javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 javac@ -> /usr/local/bin/= javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 javadoc@ -> /usr/local/bi= n/javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 javah@ -> /usr/local/bin/= javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 javap@ -> /usr/local/bin/= javavm -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21602 Aug 1 14:08 javavm* lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 javaws@ -> /usr/local/bin= /javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 jconsole@ -> /usr/local/b= in/javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 jdb@ -> /usr/local/bin/ja= vavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 jinfo@ -> /usr/local/bin/= javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 jmap@ -> /usr/local/bin/j= avavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 jps@ -> /usr/local/bin/ja= vavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 jsadebugd@ -> /usr/local/= bin/javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 jstack@ -> /usr/local/bin= /javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 jstat@ -> /usr/local/bin/= javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 jstatd@ -> /usr/local/bin= /javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 keytool@ -> /usr/local/bi= n/javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 kinit@ -> /usr/local/bin/= javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 klist@ -> /usr/local/bin/= javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 ktab@ -> /usr/local/bin/j= avavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Aug 1 14:08 manvm@ -> /usr/local/bin/= javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 native2ascii@ -> /usr/loc= al/bin/javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 orbd@ -> /usr/local/bin/j= avavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 pack200@ -> /usr/local/bi= n/javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 policytool@ -> /usr/local= /bin/javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Aug 1 14:08 registervm@ -> /usr/local= /bin/javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 rmic@ -> /usr/local/bin/j= avavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 rmid@ -> /usr/local/bin/j= avavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 rmiregistry@ -> /usr/loca= l/bin/javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 serialver@ -> /usr/local/= bin/javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 servertool@ -> /usr/local= /bin/javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 tnameserv@ -> /usr/local/= bin/javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 7 19:13 unpack200@ -> /usr/local/= bin/javavm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Aug 1 14:08 unregistervm@ -> /usr/loc= al/bin/javavm Cheers, Matthew PS. remember to 'rehash' so your shell will pick up on changes to the executables on your $PATH. --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigF833C3BFB9A0D8AC8C38E60A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFgPJn8Mjk52CukIwRCPwgAJ0d+VjsjttT7n3/Q8WHJgkga9JWpQCeLV5w WFx9kVEb9zrW8m9MpdV8D4I= =NvcX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF833C3BFB9A0D8AC8C38E60A-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 06:43:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A53716A4AB for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:43:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (pool-71-245-104-192.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [71.245.104.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650E043CB2 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:41:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (localhost.home.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBE6hVFG001778 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:43:31 -0800 Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id kBE6hVti001775 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:43:31 -0800 Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id GAA11733; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:42:03 GMT Message-Id: <200612140642.GAA11733@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:20:35 EST." <20061214012035.GA62554@xor.obsecurity.org> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:42:03 +0000 From: Dieter Subject: Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:43:32 -0000 > Mutex profiling would show if there is a mutex somehow getting in the > way of your I/O (e.g. if Giant is somehow being forced). I dont think > it would show anything though. You can try to study interrupt issues > (e.g. look for an interrupt storm during I/O) with vmstat -i. Other > than that you'd probably have to get your hands dirtier in the code. max total count avg cnt_hold cnt_lock name 1158725 1185330 1596 742 0 0 /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/pmap.c:1563 (pmap) 1158721 1166593 1596 730 1 17 /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/pmap.c:1562 (vm page queue mutex) 90598 578551 199304 2 3 4 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_sx.c:157 (lockbuilder mtxpool) 83234 967612 124000 7 0 0 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_fault.c:906 (vm object) 83102 2515439 450378 5 0 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c:369 (process lock) 82878 2049540 3215 637 196 2 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_synch.c:236 (Giant) 82632 947545 124000 7 0 4 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_fault.c:295 (vm object) 82550 285981 124000 2 4 0 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_fault.c:929 (process lock) 46745 46789 11 4253 0 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:1041 (vm object) 46741 52927 646 81 1 0 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_object.c:1775 (vm page queue mutex) 30068 105046 1230 85 2 0 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_map.c:1380 (vm object) 24083 300793 136380 2 1 1 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_object.c:454 (vm object) 24076 32222 2960 10 2 0 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_object.c:625 (vm page queue mutex) 19419 70113 7295 9 0 0 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_fault.c:787 (vm object) 16024 65388 5494 11 1 2 /usr/src/sys/vm/vnode_pager.c:1181 (vnode interlock) 16018 51608 8791 5 7 9 /usr/src/sys/vm/vnode_pager.c:1169 (vm object) 14398 1084811 25198 43 108 3 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_sysctl.c:1280 (Giant) 11940 274443 37582 7 0 1 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:3082 (vm object) 11567 625811 312742 2 0 2 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_lock.c:168 (lockbuilder mtxpool) 11096 45666 5241 8 1 4 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_map.c:2404 (vm object) If I'm reading the man page right, pmap holds a lock for over 1 second? Here's a capture with the stats reset after the Ethernet->disk process was already started up and running. max total count avg cnt_hold cnt_lock name 9649 277992 20357 13 0 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:3364 (vm object) 5939 106822 1158 92 135 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_sysctl.c:1280 (Giant) 5620 17658 29 608 2 0 /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/pmap.c:2481 (vm page queue mutex) 5616 17502 29 603 0 0 /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/pmap.c:2482 (pmap) 5021 446103 79641 5 1 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c:369 (process lock) 3270 16597 6032 2 0 0 /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/pmap.c:2602 (pmap) 2861 15595 7158 2 0 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_sx.c:245 (lockbuilder mtxpool) 2811 5180 767 6 0 0 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_map.c:2193 (vm object) 2542 22712 243 93 29 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_synch.c:236 (Giant) 2152 14813 658 22 2 0 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_fault.c:683 (vm object) 2054 4334 991 4 1 1 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:1983 (vnode interlock) 1999 11592 2575 4 0 0 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_object.c:454 (vm object) 1497 4845 431 11 0 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2185 (vnode interlock) 1157 10887 1288 8 0 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2073 (vnode interlock) 1106 3920 33 118 0 0 /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c:1086 (struct mount mtx) 1082 5893 40 147 0 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2805 (struct mount mtx) 905 1812 12 151 0 0 /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c:1117 (struct mount mtx) 880 15969 1525 10 0 0 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_fault.c:295 (vm object) 873 6137 494 12 0 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_cache.c:457 (vnode interlock) 868 10460 1595 6 0 0 /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/pmap.c:1851 (pmap) 867 82404 42253 1 0 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_lock.c:168 (lockbuilder mtxpool) 813 9197 107 85 0 0 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_map.c:1380 (vm object) 809 8591 95 90 1 0 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_map.c:1431 (vm page queue mutex) 708 1017 27 37 0 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_exec.c:822 (vm object) The following is with profiling kernel, but with profiling disabled: 5 users Load 0.00 0.00 0.01 Dec 13 22:39 Mem:KB REAL VIRTUAL VN PAGER SWAP PAGER Tot Share Tot Share Free in out in out Act 446604 5696 461972 6952 749096 count All 1262444 5696 1620985k 6952 pages zfod Interrupts Proc:r p d s w Csw Trp Sys Int Sof Flt cow 3254 total 41 8844 1 1099 8706 11 563476 wire 1000 0: clk 16720 act 1: atkb 1.2%Sys 3.6%Intr 0.0%User 0.0%Nice 95.2%Idl 685800 inact 5 3: sio1 | | | | | | | | | | 4 cache 4: sio0 =+ 749092 free 7: ppc0 daefr stray 7 Namei Name-cache Dir-cache prcfr 128 8: rtc Calls hits % hits % react 10: ohc pdwak 2121 11: fwo pdpgs 14: ata Disks ad2 ad4 ad6 ad8 ad10 da0 cd0 intrn 15: ata KB/t 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 128 0.00 0.00 218640 buf tps 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 10 dirtybuf MB/s 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.30 0.00 0.00 100000 desiredvnodes % busy 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 815 numvnodes 137 freevnodes interrupt total rate irq0: clk 5401694 999 irq1: atkbd0 2 0 irq3: sio1 44965 8 irq4: sio0 407 0 irq7: ppc0 49 0 stray irq7 1 0 irq8: rtc 691295 127 irq10: ohci0 ohci1+ 253 0 irq11: fwohci0 bge* 2750114 509 irq14: ata0 57 0 irq15: ata1 431 0 Total 8889268 1645 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 07:30:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D026316A415 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:30:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) Received: from mail-in08.adhost.com (mailnat.adhost.com [216.211.128.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B150E43CB1 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:29:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) Received: from ad-exh01.adhost.lan (unknown [216.211.143.69]) by mail-in08.adhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964578FC71; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:30:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) Received: from [24.17.246.20] ([10.142.3.172]) by ad-exh01.adhost.lan with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:30:45 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20061214011324.GF79418@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20061214010124.29818.qmail@web34502.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20061214011324.GF79418@dan.emsphone.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Michael Smith Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:30:43 -0800 To: Dan Nelson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Dec 2006 07:30:45.0442 (UTC) FILETIME=[C4977220:01C71F51] Cc: "N. Harrington" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How does one bond two interfaces together to share bandwidth? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:30:46 -0000 Hello: On Dec 13, 2006, at 5:13 PM, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Dec 13), N. Harrington said: >> I am trying to figure out how to bond or combine 2 interfaces >> together. Such that they each share traffic. >> >> I have tried one way, however when I use it I seem to have an odd >> broadcast occuring on my switch. Such that I am seeing incoming >> traffic hit some other ports on the switch. Can someone confirm if I >> am doing it correctly? Perhaps I have a switch issue? Do I also need >> to bond the ports together on the switch? Sadly the switch they are >> connected to does not support port bonding. Does that matter? I have >> not seen any mention of that being required. > > If the remote switch doesn't support it, only outgoing traffic will be > split across both ports. Incoming traffic will probably come in on > the > first port that came up, or the switch may decide that there's a > routing loop (or other misconfiguration) because the same MAC address > is seen on both ports, and disable one of the ports (or even both). > Most managed switches should support it; they may call it trunking. Both sides need to support EtherChannel which is 802.3ad (although Cisco does have a proprietary variant (go figure)). If only one side is set to channel and the other side is not, the non-channeled side will detect a loop and set one of the ports into blocking state; that is, if it's Spanning Tree aware. If it's a consumer-grade switch or hub, the network will do the functional equivalent of a Bill the Cat face and fall over most dramatically. Regards, Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 07:41:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A73716A407 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:41:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46AA243C9D for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:40:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F9F1A4D83; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:41:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BABB85138F; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:41:33 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:41:33 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dieter Message-ID: <20061214074133.GA67465@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20061214012035.GA62554@xor.obsecurity.org> <200612140642.GAA11733@sopwith.solgatos.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200612140642.GAA11733@sopwith.solgatos.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:41:36 -0000 --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:42:03PM +0000, Dieter wrote: > > Mutex profiling would show if there is a mutex somehow getting in the > > way of your I/O (e.g. if Giant is somehow being forced). I dont think > > it would show anything though. You can try to study interrupt issues > > (e.g. look for an interrupt storm during I/O) with vmstat -i. Other > > than that you'd probably have to get your hands dirtier in the code. >=20 > max total count avg cnt_hold cnt_lock name > 1158725 1185330 1596 742 0 0 /usr/src= /sys/amd64/amd64/pmap.c:1563 (pmap) > 1158721 1166593 1596 730 1 17 /usr/src= /sys/amd64/amd64/pmap.c:1562 (vm page queue mutex) > 90598 578551 199304 2 3 4 /usr/src/= sys/kern/kern_sx.c:157 (lockbuilder mtxpool) > 83234 967612 124000 7 0 0 /usr/src/= sys/vm/vm_fault.c:906 (vm object) > 83102 2515439 450378 5 0 0 /usr/src/= sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c:369 (process lock) > 82878 2049540 3215 637 196 2 /usr/src/= sys/kern/kern_synch.c:236 (Giant) > 82632 947545 124000 7 0 4 /usr/src/= sys/vm/vm_fault.c:295 (vm object) > 82550 285981 124000 2 4 0 /usr/src/= sys/vm/vm_fault.c:929 (process lock) > 46745 46789 11 4253 0 0 /usr/src/= sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:1041 (vm object) > 46741 52927 646 81 1 0 /usr/src/= sys/vm/vm_object.c:1775 (vm page queue mutex) > 30068 105046 1230 85 2 0 /usr/src/= sys/vm/vm_map.c:1380 (vm object) > 24083 300793 136380 2 1 1 /usr/src/= sys/vm/vm_object.c:454 (vm object) > 24076 32222 2960 10 2 0 /usr/src/= sys/vm/vm_object.c:625 (vm page queue mutex) > 19419 70113 7295 9 0 0 /usr/src/= sys/vm/vm_fault.c:787 (vm object) > 16024 65388 5494 11 1 2 /usr/src/= sys/vm/vnode_pager.c:1181 (vnode interlock) > 16018 51608 8791 5 7 9 /usr/src/= sys/vm/vnode_pager.c:1169 (vm object) > 14398 1084811 25198 43 108 3 /usr/src/= sys/kern/kern_sysctl.c:1280 (Giant) > 11940 274443 37582 7 0 1 /usr/src/= sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:3082 (vm object) > 11567 625811 312742 2 0 2 /usr/src/= sys/kern/kern_lock.c:168 (lockbuilder mtxpool) > 11096 45666 5241 8 1 4 /usr/src/= sys/vm/vm_map.c:2404 (vm object) >=20 >=20 > If I'm reading the man page right, pmap holds a lock for over 1 second? In total, over 1600 operations. It's not an issue. The rest looks fine at a quick glance too. Kris --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFgQAtWry0BWjoQKURApjDAJsEwjZrIm4pIgG60Ir5G469KvI3fACgooAw yUAN8Dh8PB1U14s9VqgHwfo= =oIo4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 08:08:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8319716A407 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:08:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (ns.umpquanet.com [63.105.30.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2908343C9F for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:06:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBE88NbT016307; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:08:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: (from james@localhost) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id kBE88NIZ016306; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:08:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:08:23 -0800 From: James Long To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, tuaregmex@gmail.com, lane@joeandlane.com Message-ID: <20061214080822.GA14597@ns.umpquanet.com> References: <20061214064340.B476016A505@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061214064340.B476016A505@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:08:15 -0000 > Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:33:32 -0600 > From: Lane > Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <200612131733.32763.lane@joeandlane.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Tuareg, > > clearly sendmail is running. That is indicated by "sendmail[41626]" in > your /var/log/sendmail log. > > The question, of course, is how does it get started. This is quite the WAG here, but can sendmail be started on-demand from inetd.conf? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 09:02:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A9316A417 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:02:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: from smtp5.wlink.com.np (smtp5.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12E2643CAD for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:00:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: (qmail 31689 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2006 08:57:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp1.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.76) by 0 with SMTP; 14 Dec 2006 08:57:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 79972 invoked by uid 98); 14 Dec 2006 09:02:14 -0000 Received: from 202.79.36.216 by smtp1.wlink.com.np (envelope-from , uid 1009) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.88.4/2205. Clear:RC:1(202.79.36.216):. Processed in 0.024256 secs); 14 Dec 2006 09:02:14 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: teklimbu@wlink.com.np via smtp1.wlink.com.np X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(202.79.36.216):. Processed in 0.024256 secs) Received: from [202.79.36.216] (HELO teklimbu.wlink.com.np) by smtp1.wlink.com.np (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 14 Dec 2006 09:02:07 -0000 (Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:47:07 +0545) Received: (qmail 80495 invoked by uid 1009); 14 Dec 2006 09:12:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO teklimbu.wlink.com.np) (202.79.36.216) by teklimbu.wlink.com.np with SMTP; 14 Dec 2006 09:12:35 -0000 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:57:35 +0545 From: Tek Bahadur Limbu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20061214145735.658f44b4.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> Organization: Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.0 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Check-By: smtp1.wlink.com.np Spam: No ; 0.8 / 5.0 X-Spam-Status-WL: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 Subject: Local DNS Caching not caching on external interface X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:02:23 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear All, I am very new to Bind and FreeBSD. I have just configured a Local DNS server using the built-in Bind 9.3.1 on a FreeBSD 5.4 machine. My problem is that the machine can cache queries on the localhost and loop back (127.0.0.1) interface only. I have a public static IP on this machine too and I can't seem to query the caching name server from my local network. In Linux, this is no problem. I just can't seem to get Bind to work as in my local network. It works only on the loopback interface. I have checked my firewall but I don't it the problem is with the IPFW firewall. Please shed some light on this issue. -- With best regards and good wishes, Yours sincerely, Tek Bahadur Limbu (TAG/TDG Group) Jwl Systems Department Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. Jawalakhel, Nepal -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFgRWDVrOl+eVhOvYRAr7EAKCoMYERYmUQr57qpkK/7XE5qQM+UgCeNCi3 kRZITGwKrxNUCrv7oYoNRIc= =zZ26 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 09:08:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA6816A407 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:08:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ccowart@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu) Received: from rescomp.berkeley.edu (keyserver.Rescomp.Berkeley.EDU [169.229.70.167]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CEE943CBD for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:06:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ccowart@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu) Received: by rescomp.berkeley.edu (Postfix, from userid 1225) id 4EFFD5B763; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:08:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:08:11 -0800 From: Christopher Cowart To: Tek Bahadur Limbu Message-ID: <20061214090811.GE18145@rescomp.berkeley.edu> Mail-Followup-To: Tek Bahadur Limbu , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20061214145735.658f44b4.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="d8Lz2Tf5e5STOWUP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061214145735.658f44b4.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Local DNS Caching not caching on external interface X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:08:17 -0000 --d8Lz2Tf5e5STOWUP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 14:57 Thu 14 Dec , Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote: > Dear All, >=20 > I am very new to Bind and FreeBSD. >=20 > I have just configured a Local DNS server using the built-in Bind 9.3.1 > on a FreeBSD 5.4 machine. >=20 > My problem is that the machine can cache queries on the localhost and > loop back (127.0.0.1) interface only. >=20 > I have a public static IP on this machine too and I can't seem to query > the caching name server from my local network. >=20 > In Linux, this is no problem. I just can't seem to get Bind to work as > in my local network. It works only on the loopback interface. The default /etc/namedb/named.conf configuration file for BIND says: | // If named is being used only as a local resolver, this is a safe defaul= t. | // For named to be accessible to the network, comment this option, specify | // the proper IP address, or delete this option. | listen-on { 127.0.0.1; }; It looks like if you comment out that option, it will listen on * by default. You could also add the other IP address on which you want named to listen. --=20 Chris Cowart Network and Infrastructure Systems Administrator RSSP-IT, UC Berkeley "May all your pushes be popped" --d8Lz2Tf5e5STOWUP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFgRR7V3SOqjnqPh0RAuAOAKCo03LrDjrNWebT3Q6rWLYOae/QLwCfWP9Y 7pEKCvadYLbrPXDEKXtJcI0= =PhiT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d8Lz2Tf5e5STOWUP-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 10:41:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9310E16A505 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:41:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from work@ashleymoran.me.uk) Received: from mercureh.reacthosting.com (reacthosting.com [195.177.245.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB0E43CA5 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:40:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from work@ashleymoran.me.uk) Received: from hosta.jigsawfinance.com ([213.106.224.113] helo=[192.168.0.34]) by mercureh.reacthosting.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Guo29-000DMG-Ht for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:41:49 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <9EF4201C-AF13-4659-AD7A-28C077DBAA5B@ashleymoran.me.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ashley Moran Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:41:48 +0000 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mercureh.reacthosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ashleymoran.me.uk X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: rc.d script for processes started with /usr/bin/env X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:41:53 -0000 Hi I just wrote a little ruby web server for internal use. I wrote it on my mac to deploy on FreeBSD, so I used "#!/usr/bin/env ruby" as the shebang. But when I do that, I can't stop the server with my rc.d script (below). If I change them both to /usr/local/bin/ruby I can make it work. Is it possible to use /usr/bin/env like this? Thanks Ashley #!/bin/sh . /etc/rc.subr name="prolite_password_server" rcvar=`set_rcvar` load_rc_config $name prolite_password_server_enable=${prolite_password_server_enable:="NO"} command="/usr/local/bin/${name}" command_interpreter="/usr/local/bin/ruby" prolite_password_server_user=${prolite_password_server_user:-"www"} prolite_password_server_group=${prolite_password_server_group:-"www"} pidfile="/var/run/${name}/${name}.pid" run_rc_command "$1" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 12:16:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB72F16A4D0 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:16:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2146B4454D for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:05:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2006 12:07:22 -0000 Received: from x475.vpn.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de (EHLO [192.168.1.12]) [130.83.73.221] by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 14 Dec 2006 13:07:22 +0100 X-Authenticated: #5465401 Message-ID: <45813EC0.8090701@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:08:32 +0100 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" Organization: Lords of Nightmare User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ashley Moran References: <9EF4201C-AF13-4659-AD7A-28C077DBAA5B@ashleymoran.me.uk> In-Reply-To: <9EF4201C-AF13-4659-AD7A-28C077DBAA5B@ashleymoran.me.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc.d script for processes started with /usr/bin/env X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:16:16 -0000 Ashley Moran wrote: > Hi > > I just wrote a little ruby web server for internal use. I wrote it on > my mac to deploy on FreeBSD, so I used "#!/usr/bin/env ruby" as the > shebang. But when I do that, I can't stop the server with my rc.d > script (below). If I change them both to /usr/local/bin/ruby I can make > it work. > > Is it possible to use /usr/bin/env like this? > All you need to do is to set command_interpreter="/usr/bin/env" for more information have a look at rc.subr(8). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 12:20:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05DF716A559 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:20:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: from smtp5.wlink.com.np (smtp5.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6673F43CAE for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:11:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: (qmail 68418 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2006 11:54:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp1.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.76) by 0 with SMTP; 14 Dec 2006 11:54:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 44888 invoked by uid 98); 14 Dec 2006 11:59:17 -0000 Received: from 202.79.36.216 by smtp1.wlink.com.np (envelope-from , uid 1009) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.88.4/2205. Clear:RC:1(202.79.36.216):. Processed in 0.028287 secs); 14 Dec 2006 11:59:17 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: teklimbu@wlink.com.np via smtp1.wlink.com.np X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(202.79.36.216):. Processed in 0.028287 secs) Received: from [202.79.36.216] (HELO teklimbu.wlink.com.np) by smtp1.wlink.com.np (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 14 Dec 2006 11:59:11 -0000 (Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:44:11 +0545) Received: (qmail 4975 invoked by uid 1009); 14 Dec 2006 12:10:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO teklimbu.wlink.com.np) (202.79.36.216) by teklimbu.wlink.com.np with SMTP; 14 Dec 2006 12:10:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:55:01 +0545 From: Tek Bahadur Limbu To: Christopher Cowart Message-Id: <20061214175501.04c4bcb2.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> In-Reply-To: <20061214090811.GE18145@rescomp.berkeley.edu> References: <20061214145735.658f44b4.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> <20061214090811.GE18145@rescomp.berkeley.edu> Organization: Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.0 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Check-By: smtp1.wlink.com.np Spam: No ; 0.8 / 5.0 X-Spam-Status-WL: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Local DNS Caching not caching on external interface X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:20:38 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:08:11 -0800 Christopher Cowart wrote: > On 14:57 Thu 14 Dec , Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > I am very new to Bind and FreeBSD. > > > > I have just configured a Local DNS server using the built-in Bind > > 9.3.1 on a FreeBSD 5.4 machine. > > > > My problem is that the machine can cache queries on the localhost > > and loop back (127.0.0.1) interface only. > > > > I have a public static IP on this machine too and I can't seem to > > query the caching name server from my local network. > > > > In Linux, this is no problem. I just can't seem to get Bind to work > > as in my local network. It works only on the loopback interface. > > The default /etc/namedb/named.conf configuration file for BIND says: > > | // If named is being used only as a local resolver, this is a safe > | default. // For named to be accessible to the network, comment this > | option, specify // the proper IP address, or delete this option. > | listen-on { 127.0.0.1; }; > > It looks like if you comment out that option, it will listen on * by > default. You could also add the other IP address on which you want > named to listen. > > -- > Chris Cowart > Network and Infrastructure Systems Administrator > RSSP-IT, UC Berkeley > "May all your pushes be popped" > Dear Chris, Thank you for your help. I did comment and added my public static IP like the following: listen-on { 202.x.x.x; }; # My Static IP Now when I do from my local PC: dig yahoo.com @202.x.x.x , I can do DNS lookups. But when I try doing that from another computer on my network, I can't do any DNS lookups. Is that anything that I miss? - -- With best regards and good wishes, Yours sincerely, Tek Bahadur Limbu (TAG/TDG Group) Jwl Systems Department Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. Jawalakhel, Nepal -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFgT8ZVrOl+eVhOvYRAn8OAJwOOC6+C8mnY+YBP+1GxG2uDTfWpgCfTFr1 168ArGMkI0+9Qj/MpzFbmUo= =p9RV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 12:25:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8253816A500 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:25:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from work@ashleymoran.me.uk) Received: from mercureh.reacthosting.com (reacthosting.com [195.177.245.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2256B43CA1 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:24:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from work@ashleymoran.me.uk) Received: from hosta.jigsawfinance.com ([213.106.224.113] helo=[192.168.0.34]) by mercureh.reacthosting.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Gupeq-000GDF-3K; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:25:52 +0000 In-Reply-To: <45813EC0.8090701@gmx.de> References: <9EF4201C-AF13-4659-AD7A-28C077DBAA5B@ashleymoran.me.uk> <45813EC0.8090701@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ashley Moran Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:25:50 +0000 To: [LoN]Kamikaze X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mercureh.reacthosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ashleymoran.me.uk X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc.d script for processes started with /usr/bin/env X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:25:54 -0000 On 14 Dec 2006, at 12:08, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > All you need to do is to set > > command_interpreter="/usr/bin/env" > > for more information have a look at rc.subr(8). Hmm I've just tried that and all I get is... [root@don ~]# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/prolite_password_server stop prolite_password_server not running? (check /var/run/ prolite_password_server/prolite_password_server.pid). Thanks for the suggestion though - I was in too much hurry to get it up to go through the rc man pages. Ashley From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 12:32:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9A716A494 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:32:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay06.ispgateway.de (smtprelay06.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B0A43C9E for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:29:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 3274 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2006 12:24:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (775067@[217.50.206.121]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay06.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 14 Dec 2006 12:24:42 -0000 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:24:34 +0100 From: Fabian Keil To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061214132434.5ac20b82@localhost> In-Reply-To: <457C686E.5050504@locolomo.org> References: <457C686E.5050504@locolomo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.2 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-PGP-KEY-URL: http://www.fabiankeil.de/gpg-keys/freebsd-listen-2008-08-18.asc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_Ppq/PRBn5Dge=FdWYnLisJA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Subject: Re: How safe is encrypted disks? (data integrity) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:32:38 -0000 --Sig_Ppq/PRBn5Dge=FdWYnLisJA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Erik Norgaard wrote: > I have been thinking to make /home on my laptop encrypted - seems like a= =20 > good idea if it gets stolen. Now, how safe is this? Not in terms of the=20 > strength of the encryption algorithm, but in terms of integrity. I have no insight on the code, but as nobody else answered, my response may be better than nothing. =20 > What happens in case of power failure, the battery runs out or system=20 > crashes for whatever reason? I have my home slice encrypted with GELI for several month now and so far I didn't notice any effects on the data integrity. I experienced several system crashes and one or two power failures do to empty battery but I didn't lose any data already saved on the disk (that I know of). The only inconvenience is that the system boots to single-user mode if the home slice isn't clean and I then have to fsck it manually. At that point the password for the key is already entered, so I'm not sure why the slice can't be fscked automatically. It could be the .eli extension, but I didn't investigate this any further. Fabian --=20 http://www.fabiankeil.de/ --Sig_Ppq/PRBn5Dge=FdWYnLisJA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFgUKHBYqIVf93VJ0RAnVqAJ9pM3LavMFKRinomIerp9d0AxEt1ACfSXNR E78z0GOsT8WRGQmS2UfpLUU= =GEqq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_Ppq/PRBn5Dge=FdWYnLisJA-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 12:32:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B09116A572 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:32:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from p.p.tyrrell@googlemail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52EDC43CC5 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:30:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from p.p.tyrrell@googlemail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u40so409366ugc for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 04:31:47 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=googlemail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; b=n0+nseS4dKcnou6L0fBPzfWtN07EhIq/3tcXVWFg7RAbt4oCAU+80j93el1ZXI03SZvraY1/wDXYg/ra12Rq7fsMXNrHwcEm4HcYdW9Vo1RGX9ryqqys/u4Uv5Pyd2Exp7GLyOIndGqJmZbILEiCL/ZfbQI2YVCqjMZOI8sT61g= Received: by 10.78.139.1 with SMTP id m1mr654197hud.1166099505872; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 04:31:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.107.9 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 04:31:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <162fb23f0612140431g44dc095bt3a858e75009fddaf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:31:45 +0000 From: "P Tyrrell" Sender: p.p.tyrrell@googlemail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org. MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Google-Sender-Auth: dd0ff04297d90558 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Black Lines on my monitor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:32:54 -0000 Hello - Help About two weeks ago I noticed that there was a shadow appearing on the monitor alond any black type or dark picture - thinking it wasthe monitor I swaped it with another and there are still black lines appearing along the lines of text. What can I do to get rid of this? Please bear in mind youre talking to a layman not a professional techie. thankyou. Paul From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 13:15:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A07D16A4FF for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:15:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phatfish@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 175684419E for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:06:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phatfish@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so448926uge for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 05:07:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=hMGXXlxXXeoJsB2bKKac1v/akPR2AKdPNu4p8I1D+/S1ngZGJBrERyD5KuRfi2E4TRkdWKribsRUAp6E/OU57Vt0F+CNW2TklyVqwysfjMq3GOpI6c4lP3BLzlxd8+N+h+N9MIwSpZ0p5D3nu04NUONlqjKbJphBUOs3EMDyE/o= Received: by 10.82.138.6 with SMTP id l6mr251494bud.1166101663578; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 05:07:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.167.16 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 05:07:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <718eeb340612140507j59dd84bbxc5436e4021fc66d7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:07:43 +0000 From: Chris To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20061213172609.GB36107@ns2.wananchi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061213141914.GR46624@ns2.wananchi.com> <718eeb340612130748p4a96f640qa3a9693f3e8ad4f7@mail.gmail.com> <20061213172609.GB36107@ns2.wananchi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Newbie on tunnelling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:15:44 -0000 The interface configuration looks correct, similar to how i have created a bridge on my box at startup. Ive never needed to setup any routes at startup myself; but adding a single route as you need cant be too hard... sorry i cant be of more help. Sometimes man pages assume knowledge beyond a beginner (at least ive found that). But a web search will usually get you the answer quicker than waiting for someone to give it to you :) On 13/12/06, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > So, if I compiled kernel with "device gre" (FreeBSD 5.5 here, sorry) > then there is no need to load the module via loader.conf, yes? > > So in rc.conf. would the following suffice (for hq-office)? > > cloned_interfaces="gre0" > ifconfig_gre0="inet 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 tunnel 62.8.68.94 62.8.82.142 up" > > How about the static route portions? It's still not clear to me how to > take care of them in rc.conf. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 13:25:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44F316A40F for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:25:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E521A43CA0 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:23:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so243245nzh for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 05:25:07 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=c7QO8hlTJqMrGFl6BfeusLJ5F3Hs89XA1LOis2AcesFZAZzgqjzqs8V8KNKaNHVt99X+o3gCmvkEVJuTG6LN6v6gu1XEzEbqazkeXkIs6xZA+anWQIcyN4M2MfdYyMC30iNIGC8wCmBHNlWyzLFV6g2Sj6zrLphM4noBhsURmkQ= Received: by 10.64.10.2 with SMTP id 2mr1459233qbj.1166102706948; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 05:25:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.75.14 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 05:25:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <17489c7a0612140525i46b19403k96ac866be59ca951@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:25:06 -0500 From: "Chad Gross" To: "Fabian Keil" In-Reply-To: <20061214132434.5ac20b82@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <457C686E.5050504@locolomo.org> <20061214132434.5ac20b82@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How safe is encrypted disks? (data integrity) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:25:08 -0000 On 12/14/06, Fabian Keil wrote: > > Erik Norgaard wrote: > > > I have been thinking to make /home on my laptop encrypted - seems like a > > good idea if it gets stolen. Now, how safe is this? Not in terms of the > > strength of the encryption algorithm, but in terms of integrity. > > I have no insight on the code, but as nobody else answered, > my response may be better than nothing. > > > What happens in case of power failure, the battery runs out or system > > crashes for whatever reason? > > I have my home slice encrypted with GELI for several month now > and so far I didn't notice any effects on the data integrity. > > I experienced several system crashes and one or two power failures > do to empty battery but I didn't lose any data already saved > on the disk (that I know of). > > The only inconvenience is that the system boots to single-user > mode if the home slice isn't clean and I then have to fsck it > manually. > > At that point the password for the key is already entered, > so I'm not sure why the slice can't be fscked automatically. > It could be the .eli extension, but I didn't investigate this > any further. > > Fabian > -- > http://www.fabiankeil.de/ > > > Erik, I also use geli and it works great. I have had power failures as well and have not lost any data upon reboot. Fabian, Yes the manual fsck is a pain. I am not sure why it has to be done manually either, but I don't think it is just the .eli extension. Did you notice you have to specify that it is UFS as well? Another thing to consider is the performance hit when using geli with a high encryption. I have mine set to the highest (I think) bit possible and when transferring anything ~500MB+ it lags the system a bit to do the encryption. Chad From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 13:36:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A25316A412 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:36:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.238]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E42543E84 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:32:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so244447nzh for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 05:34:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=lX/ptW4rP9QMiiMIaaTM81viLsiVc47eEKVsl+UIALs+0TygyWRUskcpVqUfzb6L7/XBJ1eLnaQ3D3Z4GPYBB6yZp5+oQGsFkMQ2+4vg81CtCILaaHFFWGR0GPJxQlFuM6wRMeCK8hgdVcVTNPi2lZu+oCtO4xvTV3G1+80c5D0= Received: by 10.65.237.1 with SMTP id o1mr1495675qbr.1166103251157; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 05:34:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.75.14 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 05:34:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <17489c7a0612140534l475bc427l28292e5de8adb098@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:34:11 -0500 From: "Chad Gross" To: "Tek Bahadur Limbu" In-Reply-To: <20061214175501.04c4bcb2.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061214145735.658f44b4.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> <20061214090811.GE18145@rescomp.berkeley.edu> <20061214175501.04c4bcb2.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Christopher Cowart Subject: Re: Local DNS Caching not caching on external interface X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:36:19 -0000 On 12/14/06, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:08:11 -0800 > Christopher Cowart wrote: > > > On 14:57 Thu 14 Dec , Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > > > I am very new to Bind and FreeBSD. > > > > > > I have just configured a Local DNS server using the built-in Bind > > > 9.3.1 on a FreeBSD 5.4 machine. > > > > > > My problem is that the machine can cache queries on the localhost > > > and loop back (127.0.0.1) interface only. > > > > > > I have a public static IP on this machine too and I can't seem to > > > query the caching name server from my local network. > > > > > > In Linux, this is no problem. I just can't seem to get Bind to work > > > as in my local network. It works only on the loopback interface. > > > > The default /etc/namedb/named.conf configuration file for BIND says: > > > > | // If named is being used only as a local resolver, this is a safe > > | default. // For named to be accessible to the network, comment this > > | option, specify // the proper IP address, or delete this option. > > | listen-on { 127.0.0.1; }; > > > > It looks like if you comment out that option, it will listen on * by > > default. You could also add the other IP address on which you want > > named to listen. > > > > -- > > Chris Cowart > > Network and Infrastructure Systems Administrator > > RSSP-IT, UC Berkeley > > "May all your pushes be popped" > > > > Dear Chris, > > Thank you for your help. I did comment and added my public static IP > like the following: > > > listen-on { 202.x.x.x; }; # My Static IP > > Now when I do from my local PC: > > dig yahoo.com @202.x.x.x , I can do DNS lookups. > > But when I try doing that from another computer on my network, I can't > do any DNS lookups. > > > Is that anything that I miss? > > > - -- > > > With best regards and good wishes, > > Yours sincerely, > > Tek Bahadur Limbu > > (TAG/TDG Group) > Jwl Systems Department > > Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. > > Jawalakhel, Nepal > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) > > iD8DBQFFgT8ZVrOl+eVhOvYRAn8OAJwOOC6+C8mnY+YBP+1GxG2uDTfWpgCfTFr1 > 168ArGMkI0+9Qj/MpzFbmUo= > =p9RV > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ You have to tell the other machines on your network to use the IP of the local DNS server for domain name resolution. If you are using DHCP you can configure your DHCP server to give this information with the IP. Otherwise you must manually do it, which will be different between operating systems. HINT: In FreeBSD add the IP of the DNS server to /etc/resolve.conf Chad From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 13:48:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C335216A593 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:48:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from renegadepenguin@comcast.net) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.192.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DAD43EAB for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:40:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from renegadepenguin@comcast.net) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (c-67-183-204-41.hsd1.wa.comcast.net[67.183.204.41]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20061214134202m1300isfdpe>; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:42:02 +0000 Message-ID: <458154B3.60008@comcast.net> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 05:42:11 -0800 From: Renegade Penguin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b1pre (Windows/20061118) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <162fb23f0612140431g44dc095bt3a858e75009fddaf@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <162fb23f0612140431g44dc095bt3a858e75009fddaf@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Black Lines on my monitor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:48:00 -0000 If it's the video card, it very likely could be a speck of dust across some of the traces on any number of chips on the card. Taking out the video card, blowing it off, and re-seating it may help. A thorough cleaning out of the case could help as well. RP P Tyrrell wrote: > Hello - Help > > About two weeks ago I noticed that there was a shadow appearing on the > monitor alond any black type or dark picture - thinking it wasthe > monitor I > swaped it with another and there are still black lines appearing along > the > lines of text. > > What can I do to get rid of this? > Please bear in mind youre talking to a layman not a professional techie. > thankyou. > > Paul From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 13:49:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9840F16A6C1 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:49:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80D9E43CBD for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:46:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2006 13:47:59 -0000 Received: from x70.vpn.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de (EHLO [192.168.1.12]) [130.83.72.70] by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 14 Dec 2006 14:47:59 +0100 X-Authenticated: #5465401 Message-ID: <45815658.5060201@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:49:12 +0100 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" Organization: Lords of Nightmare User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ashley Moran References: <9EF4201C-AF13-4659-AD7A-28C077DBAA5B@ashleymoran.me.uk> <45813EC0.8090701@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc.d script for processes started with /usr/bin/env X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:49:17 -0000 Ashley Moran wrote: > Hmm I've just tried that and all I get is... > > [root@don ~]# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/prolite_password_server stop > prolite_password_server not running? (check > /var/run/prolite_password_server/prolite_password_server.pid). Are you certain that this is the pidfile used by your server? Are you aware that the service is responsible for creating the pidfile, not rc.subr? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 13:56:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19AA016A407 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:56:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [195.115.46.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 755D343D76 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:53:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6662B384 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:55:18 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.4.4 (20061120) at rmm.fr Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (newmail.rmm.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id l+1nVsnakYLa for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:55:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (me.todoo.biz [82.66.93.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DFBB2B382 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:55:18 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: Liste FreeBSD From: bsd Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:55:05 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Subject: remote syslog to specific file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:56:41 -0000 Hello, I am trying to log my sonicwall FW log to a specific file=85 For the moment all logs are sent to /var/log/messages I would like them to go to /var/log/sonic.log I have tried couple of things which does not seem to work, among them : > +fw.xxx.yyy > local0.* /var/log/sonic.log > +@ --> not working > local0.* /var/log/sonic.log --> not working either In /var/log/messages my log are of that format : > Dec 14 14:50:49 fw id=3Dfirewall sn=3D0006Bxxx4D6C time=3D"2006-12-14 =20= > 14:50:45" fw=3D80.98.206.97 pri=3D5 c=3D64 m=3D36 msg=3D"TCP = connection =20 > dropped" n=3D183 src=3D80.97.99.70:3763:WAN:89-90-99-70.pde.norby.ee =20= > dst=3D192.168.2.3:135:LAN:newmail.rmm.fr proto=3Dtcp/135 Any help would be welcome. ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?= =BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD bsd @at@ todoo.biz ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?= =BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF P "Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing =20 this e-mail" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 14:02:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B658716A407 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:02:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from work@ashleymoran.me.uk) Received: from mercureh.reacthosting.com (reacthosting.com [195.177.245.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E23D143E66 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:57:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from work@ashleymoran.me.uk) Received: from hosta.jigsawfinance.com ([213.106.224.113] helo=[192.168.0.34]) by mercureh.reacthosting.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Gur6z-000Ixe-G3; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:59:01 +0000 In-Reply-To: <45815658.5060201@gmx.de> References: <9EF4201C-AF13-4659-AD7A-28C077DBAA5B@ashleymoran.me.uk> <45813EC0.8090701@gmx.de> <45815658.5060201@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ashley Moran Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:58:59 +0000 To: "[LoN]Kamikaze" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mercureh.reacthosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ashleymoran.me.uk X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc.d script for processes started with /usr/bin/env X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:02:02 -0000 On 14 Dec 2006, at 13:49, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > Are you certain that this is the pidfile used by your server? Are > you aware that the service is responsible for creating the pidfile, > not rc.subr? Yes, on both counts. Works fine with #!/usr/local/bin/ruby and command_interpreter="/usr/local/bin/ruby" but not #!/usr/bin/env ruby and command_interpreter="/usr/bin/env" Not that important really (now I've got it working one way), just strange Ashley From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 14:20:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A3616A49E for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:20:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A28843E61 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:11:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GurJt-0001Wu-8U for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:12:21 -0500 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost.localnet.local [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kBEEF0Qd043843 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:15:00 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id kBEEF0Ji043842 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:15:00 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:14:59 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061214064340.B476016A505@hub.freebsd.org> <20061214080822.GA14597@ns.umpquanet.com> In-Reply-To: <20061214080822.GA14597@ns.umpquanet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612140815.00323.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec7901916ad8e2bcccef0bfeecce80ce8957350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:20:49 -0000 On Thursday 14 December 2006 02:08, James Long wrote: > > Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:33:32 -0600 > > From: Lane > > Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: <200612131733.32763.lane@joeandlane.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > > Tuareg, > > > > clearly sendmail is running. That is indicated by "sendmail[41626]" in > > your /var/log/sendmail log. > > > > The question, of course, is how does it get started. > > This is quite the WAG here, but can sendmail be started on-demand > from inetd.conf? It may be a WAG, but it may explain all of what is going on. "mail" would attempt to create a connection to localhost, inetd would start sendmail to accept the connection, sendmail would route the message and then die. Tuareg, check out /etc/inetd.conf for an entry containing the word "sendmail" And let us know what you find. lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 14:38:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6AE16A504 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:38:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter.grigor@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE17543CA6 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:36:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter.grigor@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so470587uge for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:38:29 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=ADDM1ohQh4e1Y8pmo8cBskMNs0yCuI6Rr/wlATXADNpbxDtvHttFL4HWo8Ym1d0aB7zUztJyseNREFNaBHf2/mGvWeGVH7dASZiF/iME6TEpO5UQXqCwwBO0grezqSmwILvFpxxre2ZRC1ys0V7ERFVeEBr3uUWsMct7c6FeY+E= Received: by 10.78.142.14 with SMTP id p14mr764103hud.1166107108377; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:38:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.184.4 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:38:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:38:28 -0500 From: "Peter Grigor" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Dell 2950 & 1950 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:38:35 -0000 I've just gotten some quotes on a few dell machines and I was wondering now if freebsd 6.x is able to run on them properly. Perc/5i cards and 64-bit Intel chips are my worries :) Anyone have any experiences they'd like to share? Anyone successfully running mysql on an IA64 architecture with Freebsd? Thanks for any feedback, Peter <^_^> From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 14:39:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7275916A500 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:39:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AAB4C43CCC for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:38:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2006 14:39:39 -0000 Received: from x106.vpn.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de (EHLO [192.168.1.12]) [130.83.72.106] by mail.gmx.net (mp035) with SMTP; 14 Dec 2006 15:39:39 +0100 X-Authenticated: #5465401 Message-ID: <45816275.9090208@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:40:53 +0100 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" Organization: Lords of Nightmare User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ashley Moran References: <9EF4201C-AF13-4659-AD7A-28C077DBAA5B@ashleymoran.me.uk> <45813EC0.8090701@gmx.de> <45815658.5060201@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc.d script for processes started with /usr/bin/env X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:39:45 -0000 Ashley Moran wrote: > On 14 Dec 2006, at 13:49, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >> Are you certain that this is the pidfile used by your server? Are you >> aware that the service is responsible for creating the pidfile, not >> rc.subr? > > Yes, on both counts. Works fine with > > #!/usr/local/bin/ruby > and > command_interpreter="/usr/local/bin/ruby" > > but not > > #!/usr/bin/env ruby > and > command_interpreter="/usr/bin/env" > > > Not that important really (now I've got it working one way), just strange > > > Ashley Maybe env replaces itself with the new process. That would explain this behaviour. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 15:03:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0786716A4A7 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:03:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97B243DC5 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:00:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBEExQqX098110; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:59:26 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kBEExQHs098109; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:59:26 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:59:26 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Lane Message-ID: <20061214145926.GA98067@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20061206034909.27125.qmail@web37214.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <7a4a15bd0612131522t2942b44bo4412d1e16c6ed2e6@mail.gmail.com> <200612131733.32763.lane@joeandlane.com> <200612132251.36352.lane@joeandlane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200612132251.36352.lane@joeandlane.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:03:47 -0000 On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:51:36PM -0600, Lane wrote: > Tuareg, > > I can't find the name of the quy who straightened me out on the fuction of > squid, but kudo's to him. > > Clearly squid is not the culprit. > > But I've done some eyeballing on /usr/sbin/periodic, and I think maybe it is > the culprit. > > First lets have a look at your /etc/crontab file. Specifically we are > interested in the lines which contain the term "periodic" > > If these lines include parameters, which are passed to /usr/sbin/periodic, > then they may be the reason for your periodic emails being sent WITHOUT > sendmail being enabled by the normal boot process. > > Take a look at /usr/sbin/periodic. Note that it uses values > in /etc/defaults/periodic.conf as well as any override variables > in /etc/rc.conf. It could also be overridden in other ways such as by > defining the value "source_periodic_confs_defined" and "periodic_conf_files" > but this should have already showed up in /etc/rc.conf. > > While you are examining /usr/sbin/periodic, look for the term "output" > > In my copy of that script there is a comment that looks like: > > #Where's our output going? > > Then there is a "case" block: > > case "$output" in > /*) pipe="cat >>$output";; > "") pipe=cat;; > *) pipe="mail -s '$host ${arg##*/} run output' $output";; > esac > > > If your predecessor had modified this script or, perhaps overridden it > using /etc/defaults/periodic.conf, then he may have either changed the *) > default case, or supplied parameters from /etc/crontab > (or /etc/defaults/periodic.conf) which could invoke sendmail directly. If he > used override variables, then he would probably also have added a case for ) > pipe="sendmail - " > > This would account for sendmail being completely disabled in /etc/rc.conf AND > for the messages being sent out via sendmail. However, as I read it, the > behaviour you have reported would only occur if /usr/sbin/periodic was > actually modified, as the use of the "$output" variables does NOT seem to > allow for invocation of sendmail directly. And I don't believe that "mail" > can force invocation of sendmail (although I may be wrong, as the man page > does imply that mail will use any means available to get the message out). > > If this is the case (i.e. if "mail" is invoking sendmail directly) you could > check it by trying to send mail from the command line on one of the servers > that actually does what you want it to do. If it works, and if there are NO > modifications to /usr/sbin/periodic or override defaults > in /etc/defaults/periodic.conf, then it will be safe to assume that > this "feature" has been properly quashed in 6.x. You would then need to > follow the procedures for setting up sendmail for outgoing-only, as many have > already recommended. I haven't followed this whole thread so I may be jumping in to the wrong place, but... Somewhere it is documented - I have read it - that various utilities such as mail invoke single instances of sendmail to transfer their _outgoing only_ messages. I think, in those cases, sendmail clears the mail queue before going away. They do not start sendmail as a daemon or to receive email. Probably some searching will find that documentation. ////jerry > > In any case, the behaviour you desire would only work properly by making the > appropriate changes to /etc/mail/.mc, (i.e. SMART_HOST > and/or HUB settings), and then running "make install" in /etc/mail. (And this > is always going to be the case where sendmail is concerned) > > I hope this information leads you to a resolution, as it has been a great > learning experience for me ... but my brain hurts :) > > lane > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 15:17:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2561316A47B for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:17:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED49343CCE for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:15:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBEFDtq6098196; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:13:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kBEFDtkR098195; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:13:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:13:54 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: James Long Message-ID: <20061214151354.GB98067@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20061214064340.B476016A505@hub.freebsd.org> <20061214080822.GA14597@ns.umpquanet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061214080822.GA14597@ns.umpquanet.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: tuaregmex@gmail.com, lane@joeandlane.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:17:02 -0000 On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 12:08:23AM -0800, James Long wrote: > > Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:33:32 -0600 > > From: Lane > > Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: <200612131733.32763.lane@joeandlane.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > > Tuareg, > > > > clearly sendmail is running. That is indicated by "sendmail[41626]" in > > your /var/log/sendmail log. > > > > The question, of course, is how does it get started. > > This is quite the WAG here, but can sendmail be started on-demand > from inetd.conf? It probably could, but I don't think that is the way it is done normally. Take a look in /etc/defaults/rc.conf at the stuff for sendmail and then note what overrides you have put in /etc/rc.conf Also, check out /etc/rc.sendmail ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 15:20:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4885316A506 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:20:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C2443CC4 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:18:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:19:54 -0500 id 00056403.45816B9A.000000CA Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:19:51 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: "Peter Grigor" Message-Id: <20061214101951.269c6303.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dell 2950 & 1950 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:20:10 -0000 In response to "Peter Grigor" : > I've just gotten some quotes on a few dell machines and I was wondering now > if freebsd 6.x is able to run on them properly. Perc/5i cards and 64-bit > Intel chips are my worries :) > > Anyone have any experiences they'd like to share? Anyone successfully > running mysql on an IA64 architecture with Freebsd? We're in the early stages of deployment with these. None of them are actually in production yet, but we're in the final stages of putting them there. 6.1 doesn't work with the onboard NICS -- you have to get a 6.2-RC or wait for 6.2. Otherwise, everything 64-bit works as far as we can tell. We're a little grumpy that we don't have any way to monitor the RAID (our Dell x850 systems use megarc to automatically signal us if a drive fails) We've also had occasional problems with the reboot and shutdown commands not completing, but it's been so intermittent that we can't seem to isolate the cause. Symptom is that it gets to the final stage of reboot/shutdown and then waits indefinitely without issuing the final ACPI command. Do some searches on my name and/or those topics on the stable@ list archives for more details. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. wmoran@collaborativefusion.com Phone: 412-422-3463x4023 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 16:02:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 869E916A40F for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:02:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kay.abendroth@raxion.net) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2688543DDE for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:58:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kay.abendroth@raxion.net) Received: from [217.85.120.33] (helo=[10.0.0.10]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu2) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKwtQ-1Guszc2dHu-0006xS; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:59:33 +0100 Message-ID: <458174DF.9030905@raxion.net> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:59:27 +0100 From: Kay Abendroth User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: User Questions References: <20061208054210.99E0.GERARD@seibercom.net> <45796DAC.8030606@raxion.net> <20061208172444.B85F.GERARD@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20061208172444.B85F.GERARD@seibercom.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 OpenPGP: id=4CCBF36C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:b74ade515889ad97333045239a316a52 Subject: Re: Unable to build jackit-0.102.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:02:53 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Gerard Seibert wrote: > On Friday December 08, 2006 at 08:50:36 (AM) Kay Abendroth wrote: > > >> Could you comment all compiler flags you set in /etc/make.conf and rerun >> the build? Please post your build-log again after that if sth. changes. > > The only global setting in the /etc/make.conf file is: > > NO_PROFILE=true > CFLAGS=-pipe > > I do have a couple of other settings, but they are nested > > .if > mumble > .endif > > I fail to see how that might effect it. Besides, they were present when > I first installed my system. > > Anyway, I will give it a try tomorrow. I don't have time this evening. > I saw this in your build log: [...] creating jackd echo "#define JACKD_MD5_SUM \"`md5sum .libs/jackd | awk '{print $1}'`\"" > jack_md5.h md5sum: not found make all-am [...] I've check that on my machine I don't get this error and I have a md5sum command installed (comes with the base system I guess). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iQEVAwUBRYF03/6xkxz4DngiAQjkDAgAr9mEVz3dQJzNQ0vxZeYcloGpABAvTrFu d+nibpd0wk0SZQN5byugy02TwlPlPzTMQNfWLQ2Ovp4/t5AXar5o4pRq/eKEzjvW yF8sJqMl+xKhnKjGW4u/hObFZLG9tCwsI+gWohKpNVKMCx+w3Ls0f875UGkzQvt8 jlgT9NH7J3s6Zfm76JiaySHkOHvKICo72R7Z7JY8Wtt21X65dEMdqTV1j77NBbgW 3aCOkg9FNnlpVpAUvybcLcdgMb4GlxHsI8dYFQ8PqUBizvGgZMrxE3ZgKV4AFefH 9fnbhtD5FOLhs7CM3sdwAseBzKAEM9PSygYqrpP/akE+FnoY/UNiqQ== =KTpo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 16:22:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CEFC16A508 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:22:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@cupid.com) Received: from email.rhwi.net (email.rhwi.net [64.72.68.244]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42297441B6 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:11:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@cupid.com) Received: (qmail 46098 invoked by uid 89); 14 Dec 2006 16:12:56 -0000 Received: from dan.internal.rhw (HELO ?192.168.1.82?) (dsikorsky@rhwi.net@192.168.1.82) by email.rhwi.net with SMTP; 14 Dec 2006 16:12:56 -0000 Message-ID: <458177D2.1040901@cupid.com> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:12:02 -0500 From: Dan Sikorsky Organization: RegionalHelpWanted/Cupid.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: EVGA e-Geforce 7300GT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:22:41 -0000 Hey, Im planning on installing this card tonite freebsd 6.1 i386 Im using a crappy radeon x300se right now, which has the Radeon choice in xorgconfig, however theres no geforce choice. Now, I've read that nvidia is the way to go for freebsd as they have Drivers! so how do I go about this, I can pkg_add these drivers? and then how do I tune X to use them thanks :-D -- Dan Sikorsky *Systems Admin/GoldMine Admin* RegionalHelpWanted.com,Inc. & Cupid.com, Inc. 845-471-5200 x220 One Civic Center Plaza, Suite 506 Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 /http://RegionalHelpWanted.com http://Cupid.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 16:24:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64D4016A8D4 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:24:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hugo@barafranca.com) Received: from mail.barafranca.com (mail.barafranca.com [67.19.101.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 353BD43D9F for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:20:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hugo@barafranca.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.barafranca.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3F9C4315 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:35:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.barafranca.com ([67.19.101.164]) by localhost (mail.barafranca.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 80530-10 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:34:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (a213-22-26-61.cpe.netcabo.pt [213.22.26.61]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.barafranca.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A027C40AE for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:34:48 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <45817A15.1030405@barafranca.com> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:21:41 +0000 From: Hugo Silva User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061007) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <457C686E.5050504@locolomo.org> <20061214132434.5ac20b82@localhost> <17489c7a0612140525i46b19403k96ac866be59ca951@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <17489c7a0612140525i46b19403k96ac866be59ca951@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at barafranca.com X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-1 required=4 tests=[none] X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Re: How safe is encrypted disks? (data integrity) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:24:07 -0000 Chad Gross wrote: > On 12/14/06, Fabian Keil wrote: >> >> Erik Norgaard wrote: >> >> > I have been thinking to make /home on my laptop encrypted - seems >> like a >> > good idea if it gets stolen. Now, how safe is this? Not in terms of >> the >> > strength of the encryption algorithm, but in terms of integrity. >> >> I have no insight on the code, but as nobody else answered, >> my response may be better than nothing. >> >> > What happens in case of power failure, the battery runs out or system >> > crashes for whatever reason? >> >> I have my home slice encrypted with GELI for several month now >> and so far I didn't notice any effects on the data integrity. >> >> I experienced several system crashes and one or two power failures >> do to empty battery but I didn't lose any data already saved >> on the disk (that I know of). >> >> The only inconvenience is that the system boots to single-user >> mode if the home slice isn't clean and I then have to fsck it >> manually. >> >> At that point the password for the key is already entered, >> so I'm not sure why the slice can't be fscked automatically. >> It could be the .eli extension, but I didn't investigate this >> any further. >> >> Fabian >> -- >> http://www.fabiankeil.de/ >> >> >> > Erik, > > I also use geli and it works great. I have had power failures as well and > have not lost any data upon reboot. > > Fabian, > > Yes the manual fsck is a pain. I am not sure why it has to be done > manually > either, but I don't think it is just the .eli extension. Did you > notice you > have to specify that it is UFS as well? > > > > Another thing to consider is the performance hit when using geli with > a high > encryption. I have mine set to the highest (I think) bit possible and > when > transferring anything ~500MB+ it lags the system a bit to do the > encryption. > > > Chad > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Just another reply to say it works fine, I have a /private partition on my laptop using GELI for months, without any problems. Since it's not /home (so, not automounted), I have a little script to mount it, which includes a fsck (with some special flags, I'd have to turn the laptop on as I don't remember them, but man fsck should reveal them right away). Hugo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 16:33:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE49F16A4D4 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:33:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9A443CA7 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:31:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i28so258055wra for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:32:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.84.17 with SMTP id h17mr487259agb.1166113978005; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:32:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1sm1761672agb.2006.12.14.08.32.57; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:32:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0487B985; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:32:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (boss.seibercom.net [192.168.0.4]) (Authenticated sender: gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F32EB82C; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:32:55 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:33:12 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: User Questions Organization: Seibercom.NET In-Reply-To: <458174DF.9030905@raxion.net> References: <20061208172444.B85F.GERARD@seibercom.net> <458174DF.9030905@raxion.net> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20061214112530.D5F8.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.29 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: Unable to build jackit-0.102.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: User Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:33:25 -0000 On Thursday December 14, 2006 at 10:59:27 (AM) Kay Abendroth wrote: > Gerard Seibert wrote: > > On Friday December 08, 2006 at 08:50:36 (AM) Kay Abendroth wrote: > > > > > >> Could you comment all compiler flags you set in /etc/make.conf and rerun > >> the build? Please post your build-log again after that if sth. changes. > > > > The only global setting in the /etc/make.conf file is: > > > > NO_PROFILE=true > > CFLAGS=-pipe > > > > I do have a couple of other settings, but they are nested > > > > .if > > mumble > > .endif > > > > I fail to see how that might effect it. Besides, they were present when > > I first installed my system. > > > > Anyway, I will give it a try tomorrow. I don't have time this evening. > > > > > I saw this in your build log: > [...] > creating jackd > echo "#define JACKD_MD5_SUM \"`md5sum .libs/jackd | awk '{print $1}'`\"" > > jack_md5.h > md5sum: not found > make all-am > [...] > > I've check that on my machine I don't get this error and I have a md5sum > command installed (comes with the base system I guess). Someone, the maintainer I think, supplied me with a patch that corrected the problem. Simply place the patch in the ../jack/files directory and the problem is gone. Apparently, this had something to do with the fact that I did not have a: CFLAGS=0 setting in the /etc/make.conf file. --- drivers/dummy/dummy_driver.c.orig Sun Dec 10 16:31:55 2006 +++ drivers/dummy/dummy_driver.c Sun Dec 10 16:32:27 2006 @@ -41,10 +41,11 @@ /* this is used for calculate what counts as an xrun */ #define PRETEND_BUFFER_SIZE 4096 +#define VIDEO_SYNC_PERIOD 48000 / 30 + void FakeVideoSync( dummy_driver_t *driver ) { - static const int VIDEO_SYNC_PERIOD = 48000 / 30; static int vidCounter = VIDEO_SYNC_PERIOD; int period = driver->period_size; -- Gerard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 16:54:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B73EB16A508 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:54:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from morbius@pubbox.net) Received: from pubbox.net (pubbox.net [81.169.167.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 059BB43E2E for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:49:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from morbius@pubbox.net) Received: from bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk ([87.81.140.128] helo=gumby.homeunix.com) by pubbox.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Gutml-000PIK-6I for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:50:19 +0100 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:49:45 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061214164945.48275a20@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20061214002604.GA873@routeduvel.rembrandtkd.welmers.net> References: <002001c71f12$f36c4560$71d3dcc9@bloodlust> <20061214002604.GA873@routeduvel.rembrandtkd.welmers.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: morbius@pubbox.net Subject: Re: Install via ports... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:54:39 -0000 On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:26:04 +0100 Bastiaan Welmers wrote: > You can do "make fetch" to fetch the required package distfiles first, > or > "make fetch-recursive" to fetch all the required distfiles of all > packages required by this package. see "man ports" for other targets. Use make checksum-recursive not make fetch-recursive From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 17:17:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D2516AAC7 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:17:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9093D44051 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:03:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.6/8.13.8) id kBEH4oHY026740; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:04:50 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:04:49 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: P Tyrrell Message-ID: <20061214170449.GG79418@dan.emsphone.com> References: <162fb23f0612140431g44dc095bt3a858e75009fddaf@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <162fb23f0612140431g44dc095bt3a858e75009fddaf@mail.gmail.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Black Lines on my monitor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:17:19 -0000 In the last episode (Dec 14), P Tyrrell said: > About two weeks ago I noticed that there was a shadow appearing on > the monitor alond any black type or dark picture - thinking it wasthe > monitor I swaped it with another and there are still black lines > appearing along the lines of text. Are they always vertial shadows, just to the right of the image/text? Could be due to a badly plugged-in VGA cable, a cheap KVM switchbox or cheap cables, or a too-high refresh rate. Possible solutions: wiggle the cable plugs, try plugging the monitor directly into the PC if you have a switchbox, or lower your refresh rate (the flicker gets annoying to me below than 75Hz though). If you have an LCD monitor and are using a VGA cable, getting a video card with DVI outputs will fix the problem too. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 17:27:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3674C16A4A0 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:27:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (pool-71-245-104-192.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [71.245.104.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE4143E4C for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:07:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (localhost.home.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBEH9Rcs010039 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:09:27 -0800 Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id kBEH9RY3010036 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:09:27 -0800 Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id RAA26563; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:07:35 GMT Message-Id: <200612141707.RAA26563@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:41:33 EST." <20061214074133.GA67465@xor.obsecurity.org> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:07:35 +0000 From: Dieter Subject: Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:27:47 -0000 > > > Mutex profiling would show if there is a mutex somehow getting in the > > > way of your I/O (e.g. if Giant is somehow being forced). I dont think > > > it would show anything though. You can try to study interrupt issues > > > (e.g. look for an interrupt storm during I/O) with vmstat -i. Other > > > than that you'd probably have to get your hands dirtier in the code. > >=20 > > max total count avg cnt_hold cnt_lock name > > 1158725 1185330 1596 742 0 0 /usr/src= > /sys/amd64/amd64/pmap.c:1563 (pmap) > > 1158721 1166593 1596 730 1 17 /usr/src= > /sys/amd64/amd64/pmap.c:1562 (vm page queue mutex) > > 90598 578551 199304 2 3 4 /usr/src/= > sys/kern/kern_sx.c:157 (lockbuilder mtxpool) > > 83234 967612 124000 7 0 0 /usr/src/= > sys/vm/vm_fault.c:906 (vm object) > > If I'm reading the man page right, pmap holds a lock for over 1 second? > > In total, over 1600 operations. It's not an issue. The man page says: max The longest continuous hold time in microseconds. Which together with the total number, would imply 1 time it took 1.158725 seconds, and the other 1595 times averaged 16.7 usec, which seems unlikely. Am I misinterpreting the man page? > The rest looks fine at a quick glance too. What should I be looking for? Do I need to collect stats for a long period of time, or is a few seconds enough? Dd can kill the transfer in about 3 seconds. Here are stats with the Ethernet->disk program competing with dd from /dev/zero to a file, sorted by cnt_hold and by cnt_lock. max total count avg cnt_hold cnt_lock name 89 6095988 1089530 5 536 979 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:546 (Giant) 2649 1950594 360310 5 449 0 /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_usrreq.c:598 (tcp) 13553 2348809 23610 99 350 2 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_sysctl.c:1280 (Giant) 36 230008 85274 2 141 241 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_timeout.c:258 (Giant) 453 300251 180186 1 89 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:1011 (so_rcv) 199878 2351641 4706 499 88 4 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_synch.c:236 (Giant) 2138 337086 180186 1 85 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:1255 (so_rcv) 67 1120044 722561 1 83 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_taskqueue.c:219 (taskqueue) 57 219660 134214 1 70 102 /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_subr.c:1404 (tcp) 73 1830084 180344 10 65 0 /usr/src/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c:3321 (bge0) 472 272697 180155 1 63 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:1401 (so_rcv) 77 541532 361447 1 48 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_taskqueue.c:204 (taskqueue) 5198 26977 244 110 26 1 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_exit.c:233 (Giant) 50 545822 361062 1 26 0 /usr/src/sys/net/netisr.c:233 (ip_inq) 1649 287241 102509 2 24 30 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1397 (buf queue lock) 20981 212022 9317 22 19 2 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_fault.c:683 (vm object) 65 26162 3656 7 18 4 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_conf.c:324 (Giant) 7546 218853 412 531 17 1 /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/pmap.c:2481 (vm page queue mutex) 110 13982 244 57 17 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_exit.c:385 (Giant) 491 278319 170512 1 16 2 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_synch.c:238 (process lock) 52 27355 2279 12 16 9 /usr/src/sys/net/netisr.c:339 (Giant) 576 27530 1379 19 15 5307 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_conf.c:312 (Giant) 75 75460 1344 56 15 0 /usr/src/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c:3088 (bge0) 3903 49655 11221 4 11 9 /usr/src/sys/vm/vnode_pager.c:1169 (vm object) 658 88609 48732 1 11 4 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:309 (needsbuffer lock) 182 198222 127109 1 11 4 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_fault.c:907 (vm page queue mutex) 5883 382321 103647 3 10 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:2350 (vnode interlock) 273 34597 19322 1 9 4 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1297 (buf queue lock) 82 275004 180344 1 9 1 /usr/src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c:408 (bge0) 576 206209 67474 3 8 22 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:3365 (vm page queue mutex) max total count avg cnt_hold cnt_lock name 576 27530 1379 19 15 5307 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_conf.c:312 (Giant) 89 6095988 1089530 5 536 979 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:546 (Giant) 478 192375 123859 1 8 827 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_fault.c:849 (vm page queue mutex) 155 759634 362384 2 0 427 /usr/src/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c:2916 (bge0) 58 955483 180013 5 0 257 /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c:1280 (so_rcv) 145 8595737 180735 47 0 250 /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c:742 (inp) 36 230008 85274 2 141 241 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_timeout.c:258 (Giant) 615 60464 5683 10 0 187 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1456 (vm object) 149 618529 180736 3 0 183 /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c:615 (tcp) 29 1155402 723611 1 0 139 /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_taskqueue.c:158 (taskqueue) 57 219660 134214 1 70 102 /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_subr.c:1404 (tcp) 54 5116 667 7 0 94 /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_usrreq.c:629 (tcp) 499 149258 17011 8 1 49 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1665 (buf queue lock) 47 259969 169782 1 0 33 /usr/src/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:1140 (sellck) 36 456802 302786 1 0 31 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2814 (vnode interlock) 1649 287241 102509 2 24 30 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1397 (buf queue lock) 205 24243 14011 1 6 26 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_fault.c:344 (vm page queue mutex) 24 276097 180742 1 0 26 /usr/src/sys/net/if.c:2236 (ip_inq) 2811 29673 10778 2 0 25 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_map.c:2193 (vm object) 576 206209 67474 3 8 22 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:3365 (vm page queue mutex) 7564 120517 16144 7 4 21 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:3082 (vm object) 295 40504 22674 1 3 18 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1413 (vnode interlock) 276 33918 16144 2 1 14 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:3101 (vm page queue mutex) 2054 31157 15635 1 4 12 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:1983 (vnode interlock) 48 1846 883 2 0 12 /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c:4724 (Softdep Lock) 661 33248 9645 3 2 11 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_cache.c:356 (Name Cache) 563 7078 3920 1 3 11 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_object.c:1194 (vm object) 274 42309 24962 1 3 10 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:351 (needsbuffer lock) 27 544145 360697 1 0 10 /usr/src/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c:3245 (bge0) 3903 49655 11221 4 11 9 /usr/src/sys/vm/vnode_pager.c:1169 (vm object) And all the stats for dev max total count avg cnt_hold cnt_lock name 528 249014 156914 1 0 0 /usr/src/sys/dev/acpica/Osd/OsdSynch.c:301 (ACPI semaphore) 503 151513 10773 14 0 0 /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-queue.c:168 (ATA queue lock) 499 108638 8732 12 0 0 /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-queue.c:185 (ATA state lock) 418 11820 5386 2 0 4 /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-queue.c:80 (ATA queue lock) 320 115812 2637 43 0 0 /usr/src/sys/dev/random/yarrow.c:193 (random reseed) 309 98547 55775 1 3 6 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_conf.c:62 (cdev) 194 897 5 179 1 0 /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:285 (Giant) 155 759634 362384 2 0 427 /usr/src/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c:2916 (bge0) 138 240285 156914 1 0 0 /usr/src/sys/dev/acpica/Osd/OsdSynch.c:183 (ACPI semaphore) 75 75460 1344 56 15 0 /usr/src/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c:3088 (bge0) 73 1830084 180344 10 65 0 /usr/src/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c:3321 (bge0) 62 157 19 8 0 0 /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:269 (vnode interlock) 48 151 4 37 0 0 /usr/src/sys/dev/random/yarrow.c:280 (random reseed) 46 22508 5387 4 0 0 /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c:327 (ATA state lock) 32 3642 2421 1 0 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_devstat.c:394 (devstat) 29 282384 180059 1 0 0 /usr/src/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c:2840 (bge0) 27 544145 360697 1 0 10 /usr/src/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c:3245 (bge0) 9 27 3 9 0 0 /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:245 (session) 5 15 3 5 0 0 /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:246 (vnode interlock) 5 5 1 5 0 0 /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:157 (vnode interlock) 3 8 3 2 0 0 /usr/src/sys/vm/swap_pager.c:652 (swapdev) 1 406 269 1 0 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_devstat.c:381 (devstat) 1 214 134 1 0 0 /usr/src/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_thermal.c:753 (ACPI thermal zone) 1 207 134 1 0 0 /usr/src/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_thermal.c:745 (ACPI thermal zone) 1 23 15 1 0 0 /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:530 (dev_clone) 1 4 3 1 0 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_conf.c:77 (cdev) 1 1 1 1 0 0 /usr/src/sys/vm/swap_pager.c:621 (swapdev) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 17:44:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BB216A670 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:44:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=Zv0pe+=FY=vvelox.net=v.velox@yourhostingaccount.com) Received: from mailout10.yourhostingaccount.com (mailout10.yourhostingaccount.com [65.254.253.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC67440AC for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:39:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from SRS0=Zv0pe+=FY=vvelox.net=v.velox@yourhostingaccount.com) Received: from scan07.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.1.237] helo=scan07.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailout10.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1GuuZi-0004sB-QU for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:40:54 -0500 Received: from authsmtp09.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.18.9] ident=exim) by scan07.yourhostingaccount.com with spamscanlookuphost (Exim) id 1GuuZi-0004RO-8z for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:40:54 -0500 Received: from authsmtp09.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.18.9] helo=authsmtp09.yourhostingaccount.com) by scan07.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1GuuZh-0004Qp-4f for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:40:53 -0500 Received: from [69.92.217.33] (helo=vixen42) by authsmtp09.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtpa (Exim) id 1GuuZg-0000DG-Jv; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:40:52 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:41:53 -0600 From: Vulpes Velox To: Dan Sikorsky Message-ID: <20061214114153.68702c67@vixen42> In-Reply-To: <458177D2.1040901@cupid.com> References: <458177D2.1040901@cupid.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EN-UserInfo: 0d1ca1697cdb7a831d4877828571b7ab:1570f0de6936c69fef9e164fffc541bc X-EN-AuthUser: vvelox2 Sender: Vulpes Velox Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: EVGA e-Geforce 7300GT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:44:04 -0000 On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:12:02 -0500 Dan Sikorsky wrote: > Hey, Im planning on installing this card tonite > > freebsd 6.1 i386 > > Im using a crappy radeon x300se right now, which has the Radeon > choice in xorgconfig, however theres no geforce choice. > Now, I've read that nvidia is the way to go for freebsd as they > have Drivers! > > so how do I go about this, I can pkg_add these drivers? and then > how do I tune X > to use them Pkg_add should be perfectly fine. Do a man on X and look at the -configure option. From there you can easily tweak that file to your liking. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 17:49:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6903216A412 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:49:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.hill@yournetplus.com) Received: from admin.mwci.net (cgate.yournetplus.com [162.42.148.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A48D343CB9 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:47:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from d.hill@yournetplus.com) Received: from [65.124.230.214] (account d.hill@yournetplus.com) by admin.mwci.net (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.8) with HTTP id 78806398 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:48:26 +0000 From: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.8 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:48:26 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: PowerEdge 6850 Install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:49:18 -0000 I've got an issue with getting FreeBSD to recognize past four gigs of ram. The server we have has 12 gig. I am able to successfully recompile the kernel and get the four CPU's to show up that are installed in the server. I've taken and attempted to compile the PAE kernel file and every time the server attempts to boot to the default option on the standard boot menu, the server reboots itself. This is a continuous cycle. Can anyone direct me to what I need to do for having the server recognize all 12 gig? I've seen threads on using the ia64 install, however the install notes state it is for the Itanium and Itanium 2 CPU's. Attempting to boot from the first ISO CD doesn't do anything. The server is a PowerEdge 6850 with four 3.0ghz DualCore Intel Zeon processors with 12 gig ram. Perc4 onboard controller with five 73gig 10K RPM drives. Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 17:51:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E61916A4D2 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:51:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from probsdorg@yahoo.com) Received: from web52405.mail.yahoo.com (web52405.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.48.168]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 43C0643CD3 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:49:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from probsdorg@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 19010 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Dec 2006 17:51:11 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=NQPig+TtM17JMVQ0XiD62B0rqmddCxwl108OrOkZCrvxD6SOOE9NlVZmqIade4XRyDiOhmeEHxhApymJlYANyukPGOKRYgN7rloLZU7d9X2AWqoJlTi461m1cy2lSKwSCjdV/YwlY1vi4glTBq1y6q+0NiaAPq7tMEFpfZyylQM=; X-YMail-OSG: _2MXjUYVM1mTi2zIcP7p7nADc5xoUq56YimcdST.6OrJRtnLGrktQIVndPpPlthWRH4PzBrlkIlCc40Rgb1bDffGWXsF7mkm1vwMXN6Ah9u7hcu6XtBgxYHnwgRrBSynwIP1GwUy58Rtiw-- Received: from [208.180.144.84] by web52405.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:51:11 PST Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:51:11 -0800 (PST) From: probsd org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <623510.17100.qm@web52405.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: JAVA plugin for linux-seamonkey X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:51:57 -0000 I have the linux-seamonkey port built and I am trying to add the java plugin. I installed the java/diablo-jre15 and made a symlink from /usr/local/diablo-jre1.5.0/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so to /usr/local/lib/linux-seamonkey/plugins/ as well as $HOME/.mozilla/plugins yet about:plugins in seamonkey isn't showing java support. I even tried the diablo-jdk15 libjavaplugin_oji.so to no avail. Michael ____________________________________________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 18:21:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F362A16A540 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:21:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3567043FD2 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:09:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2006 18:10:15 -0000 Received: from ip176-173-59-62.adsl.versatel.nl (EHLO [192.168.5.5]) [62.59.173.176] by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 14 Dec 2006 19:10:15 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25365336 Message-ID: <45819393.20700@gmx.net> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:10:27 +0100 From: Frank Staals User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Subject: Getting a list of dependencies which have to be installed ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:21:30 -0000 Hey..., Is there a utility to display the dependencies of a port which have yet to be installed ? I know you can get a complete dependency list on freebsd.org/ports , pkg_info -r or just looking in the files in the ports dir. But is there a command to display only the dependencies which haven't been installed on your system yet ? I also looked at pkg_add -n but it immediately starts fetching the packages needed. I don't want to start downloading the complete package just because I want a list of ports I haven't installed yet. Or is the only way making a diff between the pkg_info -r output and your pkg_info -a ? If so : Is there a way to tell pkg_info when using the -r flag on a not-yet-installed-port to only get a list of the dependencies instead of downloading the complete package ? Or is there just an other utility which can display this information which I'm not aware of ? Thanks in advance, -- -Frank Staals From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 18:37:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48A316A416 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:37:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 211B843FAA for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:19:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:20:19 -0500 id 00056413.458195E3.0000143A Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:20:16 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: d.hill@yournetplus.com Message-Id: <20061214132016.a37d2b7b.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PowerEdge 6850 Install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:37:24 -0000 In response to d.hill@yournetplus.com: > I've got an issue with getting FreeBSD to recognize past > four gigs of ram. The server we have has 12 gig. I am able > to successfully recompile the kernel and get the four > CPU's to show up that are installed in the server. > > I've taken and attempted to compile the PAE kernel file > and every time the server attempts to boot to the default > option on the standard boot menu, the server reboots > itself. This is a continuous cycle. One of the required drivers probably doesn't work right with PAE. I don't know how well PAE is supported anymore, now that amd64 is stable. > Can anyone direct me to what I need to do for having the > server recognize all 12 gig? I've seen threads on using > the ia64 install, however the install notes state it is > for the Itanium and Itanium 2 CPU's. Attempting to boot > from the first ISO CD doesn't do anything. You want the amd64 version. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. wmoran@collaborativefusion.com Phone: 412-422-3463x4023 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 18:40:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2346516A416 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:40:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6AA443DE4 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:24:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580A41A4D9E; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:25:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B097451375; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:25:17 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:25:17 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dieter Message-ID: <20061214182517.GA94080@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20061214074133.GA67465@xor.obsecurity.org> <200612141707.RAA26563@sopwith.solgatos.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200612141707.RAA26563@sopwith.solgatos.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:40:17 -0000 --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 09:07:35AM +0000, Dieter wrote: > > > > Mutex profiling would show if there is a mutex somehow getting in t= he > > > > way of your I/O (e.g. if Giant is somehow being forced). I dont th= ink > > > > it would show anything though. You can try to study interrupt issu= es > > > > (e.g. look for an interrupt storm during I/O) with vmstat -i. Other > > > > than that you'd probably have to get your hands dirtier in the code. > > >=3D20 > > > max total count avg cnt_hold cnt_lock name > > > 1158725 1185330 1596 742 0 0 /usr= /src=3D > > /sys/amd64/amd64/pmap.c:1563 (pmap) > > > 1158721 1166593 1596 730 1 17 /usr= /src=3D > > /sys/amd64/amd64/pmap.c:1562 (vm page queue mutex) > > > 90598 578551 199304 2 3 4 /usr/= src/=3D > > sys/kern/kern_sx.c:157 (lockbuilder mtxpool) > > > 83234 967612 124000 7 0 0 /usr/= src/=3D > > sys/vm/vm_fault.c:906 (vm object) >=20 > > > If I'm reading the man page right, pmap holds a lock for over 1 secon= d? > >=20 > > In total, over 1600 operations. It's not an issue. >=20 > The man page says: >=20 > max The longest continuous hold time in microseconds. >=20 > Which together with the total number, would imply 1 time it took 1.158725= seconds, > and the other 1595 times averaged 16.7 usec, which seems unlikely. >=20 > Am I misinterpreting the man page? Sorry, yes. Nothing else contended for it though, so it doesn't appear to be a source of performance problems - it is probably a secondary effect from something else. I guess you're running some old version of FreeBSD since those line numbers don't correspond to anything reasonable in the current 6.x source, so I dunno what exactly. > > The rest looks fine at a quick glance too. >=20 > What should I be looking for? Do I need to collect stats for a long > period of time, or is a few seconds enough? Dd can kill the transfer > in about 3 seconds. You need to make sure your sampling while the system is in the bad state. A mutex that has a lot of acquisitions and a lot of contention for those acquisitions is a performance bottleneck. Nothing below falls into that class - in particular it's definitely not Giant causing performance loss to the filesystem. Still looks like it's a driver and/or hardware problem, but you'd need specialized knowledge to proceed with debugging it. > Here are stats with the Ethernet->disk program competing with dd from /de= v/zero > to a file, sorted by cnt_hold and by cnt_lock. >=20 > max total count avg cnt_hold cnt_lock name > 89 6095988 1089530 5 536 979 /usr/src/= sys/kern/kern_intr.c:546 (Giant) > 2649 1950594 360310 5 449 0 /usr/src/= sys/netinet/tcp_usrreq.c:598 (tcp) > 13553 2348809 23610 99 350 2 /usr/src/= sys/kern/kern_sysctl.c:1280 (Giant) > 36 230008 85274 2 141 241 /usr/src/= sys/kern/kern_timeout.c:258 (Giant) > 453 300251 180186 1 89 0 /usr/src/= sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:1011 (so_rcv) > 199878 2351641 4706 499 88 4 /usr/src/= sys/kern/kern_synch.c:236 (Giant) > 2138 337086 180186 1 85 0 /usr/src/= sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:1255 (so_rcv) > 67 1120044 722561 1 83 0 /usr/src/= sys/kern/subr_taskqueue.c:219 (taskqueue) > 57 219660 134214 1 70 102 /usr/src/= sys/netinet/tcp_subr.c:1404 (tcp) > 73 1830084 180344 10 65 0 /usr/src/= sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c:3321 (bge0) > 472 272697 180155 1 63 0 /usr/src/= sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:1401 (so_rcv) > 77 541532 361447 1 48 0 /usr/src/= sys/kern/subr_taskqueue.c:204 (taskqueue) > 5198 26977 244 110 26 1 /usr/src/= sys/kern/kern_exit.c:233 (Giant) > 50 545822 361062 1 26 0 /usr/src/= sys/net/netisr.c:233 (ip_inq) > 1649 287241 102509 2 24 30 /usr/src/= sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1397 (buf queue lock) > 20981 212022 9317 22 19 2 /usr/src/= sys/vm/vm_fault.c:683 (vm object) > 65 26162 3656 7 18 4 /usr/src/= sys/kern/kern_conf.c:324 (Giant) > 7546 218853 412 531 17 1 /usr/src/= sys/amd64/amd64/pmap.c:2481 (vm page queue mutex) > 110 13982 244 57 17 0 /usr/src/= sys/kern/kern_exit.c:385 (Giant) > 491 278319 170512 1 16 2 /usr/src/= sys/kern/kern_synch.c:238 (process lock) > 52 27355 2279 12 16 9 /usr/src/= sys/net/netisr.c:339 (Giant) > 576 27530 1379 19 15 5307 /usr/src/= sys/kern/kern_conf.c:312 (Giant) > 75 75460 1344 56 15 0 /usr/src/= sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c:3088 (bge0) > 3903 49655 11221 4 11 9 /usr/src/= sys/vm/vnode_pager.c:1169 (vm object) > 658 88609 48732 1 11 4 /usr/src/= sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:309 (needsbuffer lock) > 182 198222 127109 1 11 4 /usr/src/= sys/vm/vm_fault.c:907 (vm page queue mutex) > 5883 382321 103647 3 10 0 /usr/src/= sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:2350 (vnode interlock) > 273 34597 19322 1 9 4 /usr/src/= sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1297 (buf queue lock) > 82 275004 180344 1 9 1 /usr/src/= sys/net/if_ethersubr.c:408 (bge0) > 576 206209 67474 3 8 22 /usr/src/= sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:3365 (vm page queue mutex) >=20 >=20 > max total count avg cnt_hold cnt_lock name > 576 27530 1379 19 15 5307 /usr/src/= sys/kern/kern_conf.c:312 (Giant) > 89 6095988 1089530 5 536 979 /usr/src/= sys/kern/kern_intr.c:546 (Giant) > 478 192375 123859 1 8 827 /usr/src/= sys/vm/vm_fault.c:849 (vm page queue mutex) > 155 759634 362384 2 0 427 /usr/src/= sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c:2916 (bge0) > 58 955483 180013 5 0 257 /usr/src/= sys/netinet/tcp_input.c:1280 (so_rcv) > 145 8595737 180735 47 0 250 /usr/src/= sys/netinet/tcp_input.c:742 (inp) > 36 230008 85274 2 141 241 /usr/src/= sys/kern/kern_timeout.c:258 (Giant) > 615 60464 5683 10 0 187 /usr/src/= sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1456 (vm object) > 149 618529 180736 3 0 183 /usr/src/= sys/netinet/tcp_input.c:615 (tcp) > 29 1155402 723611 1 0 139 /usr/src/= sys/kern/subr_taskqueue.c:158 (taskqueue) > 57 219660 134214 1 70 102 /usr/src/= sys/netinet/tcp_subr.c:1404 (tcp) > 54 5116 667 7 0 94 /usr/src/= sys/netinet/tcp_usrreq.c:629 (tcp) > 499 149258 17011 8 1 49 /usr/src/= sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1665 (buf queue lock) > 47 259969 169782 1 0 33 /usr/src/= sys/kern/sys_generic.c:1140 (sellck) > 36 456802 302786 1 0 31 /usr/src/= sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2814 (vnode interlock) > 1649 287241 102509 2 24 30 /usr/src/= sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1397 (buf queue lock) > 205 24243 14011 1 6 26 /usr/src/= sys/vm/vm_fault.c:344 (vm page queue mutex) > 24 276097 180742 1 0 26 /usr/src/= sys/net/if.c:2236 (ip_inq) > 2811 29673 10778 2 0 25 /usr/src/= sys/vm/vm_map.c:2193 (vm object) > 576 206209 67474 3 8 22 /usr/src/= sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:3365 (vm page queue mutex) > 7564 120517 16144 7 4 21 /usr/src/= sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:3082 (vm object) > 295 40504 22674 1 3 18 /usr/src/= sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1413 (vnode interlock) > 276 33918 16144 2 1 14 /usr/src/= sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:3101 (vm page queue mutex) > 2054 31157 15635 1 4 12 /usr/src/= sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:1983 (vnode interlock) > 48 1846 883 2 0 12 /usr/src/= sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c:4724 (Softdep Lock) > 661 33248 9645 3 2 11 /usr/src/= sys/kern/vfs_cache.c:356 (Name Cache) > 563 7078 3920 1 3 11 /usr/src/= sys/vm/vm_object.c:1194 (vm object) > 274 42309 24962 1 3 10 /usr/src/= sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:351 (needsbuffer lock) > 27 544145 360697 1 0 10 /usr/src/= sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c:3245 (bge0) > 3903 49655 11221 4 11 9 /usr/src/= sys/vm/vnode_pager.c:1169 (vm object) >=20 > And all the stats for dev >=20 > max total count avg cnt_hold cnt_lock name > 528 249014 156914 1 0 0 /usr/src/sys= /dev/acpica/Osd/OsdSynch.c:301 (ACPI semaphore) > 503 151513 10773 14 0 0 /usr/src/sys= /dev/ata/ata-queue.c:168 (ATA queue lock) > 499 108638 8732 12 0 0 /usr/src/sys= /dev/ata/ata-queue.c:185 (ATA state lock) > 418 11820 5386 2 0 4 /usr/src/sys= /dev/ata/ata-queue.c:80 (ATA queue lock) > 320 115812 2637 43 0 0 /usr/src/sys= /dev/random/yarrow.c:193 (random reseed) > 309 98547 55775 1 3 6 /usr/src/sys= /kern/kern_conf.c:62 (cdev) > 194 897 5 179 1 0 /usr/src/sys= /fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:285 (Giant) > 155 759634 362384 2 0 427 /usr/src/sys= /dev/bge/if_bge.c:2916 (bge0) > 138 240285 156914 1 0 0 /usr/src/sys= /dev/acpica/Osd/OsdSynch.c:183 (ACPI semaphore) > 75 75460 1344 56 15 0 /usr/src/sys= /dev/bge/if_bge.c:3088 (bge0) > 73 1830084 180344 10 65 0 /usr/src/sys= /dev/bge/if_bge.c:3321 (bge0) > 62 157 19 8 0 0 /usr/src/sys= /fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:269 (vnode interlock) > 48 151 4 37 0 0 /usr/src/sys= /dev/random/yarrow.c:280 (random reseed) > 46 22508 5387 4 0 0 /usr/src/sys= /dev/ata/ata-all.c:327 (ATA state lock) > 32 3642 2421 1 0 0 /usr/src/sys= /kern/subr_devstat.c:394 (devstat) > 29 282384 180059 1 0 0 /usr/src/sys= /dev/bge/if_bge.c:2840 (bge0) > 27 544145 360697 1 0 10 /usr/src/sys= /dev/bge/if_bge.c:3245 (bge0) > 9 27 3 9 0 0 /usr/src/sys= /fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:245 (session) > 5 15 3 5 0 0 /usr/src/sys= /fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:246 (vnode interlock) > 5 5 1 5 0 0 /usr/src/sys= /fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:157 (vnode interlock) > 3 8 3 2 0 0 /usr/src/sys= /vm/swap_pager.c:652 (swapdev) > 1 406 269 1 0 0 /usr/src/sys= /kern/subr_devstat.c:381 (devstat) > 1 214 134 1 0 0 /usr/src/sys= /dev/acpica/acpi_thermal.c:753 (ACPI thermal zone) > 1 207 134 1 0 0 /usr/src/sys= /dev/acpica/acpi_thermal.c:745 (ACPI thermal zone) > 1 23 15 1 0 0 /usr/src/sys= /fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:530 (dev_clone) > 1 4 3 1 0 0 /usr/src/sys= /kern/kern_conf.c:77 (cdev) > 1 1 1 1 0 0 /usr/src/sys= /vm/swap_pager.c:621 (swapdev) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" >=20 --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFgZcNWry0BWjoQKURAiSSAJ9ZpM1s2+OIHWUP5EZCruNfpLj1oACeOmPx Zct3+/F6likEbHs4MkRfbpM= =izIX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 18:40:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F6616A4D8 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:40:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C3143F24 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:25:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so295094nzh for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:26:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=nR22RTKInOXz0ghvcqPNDxfJAnDyoRGgzdB6vE9Kk9JV9mWG9sy3I6zJt1lKLWLDQeexOSuoOwOOSlhf/ts0vGBV+uqor2yC0066nHvlKxdH8IgzhvFRfhIGQkVMBIWDuUGXDcZiCDu2ebMItToBC4WabqVxNRiThxfNlzpZNGg= Received: by 10.65.236.18 with SMTP id n18mr1996521qbr.1166120808768; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:26:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.75.14 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:26:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <17489c7a0612141026j2e5b405ewe38f83465752a621@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:26:48 -0500 From: "Chad Gross" To: "probsd org" In-Reply-To: <623510.17100.qm@web52405.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <623510.17100.qm@web52405.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: JAVA plugin for linux-seamonkey X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:40:55 -0000 On 12/14/06, probsd org wrote: > > I have the linux-seamonkey port built and I am trying > to > add the java plugin. I installed the java/diablo-jre15 > and made a symlink from > /usr/local/diablo-jre1.5.0/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so > to /usr/local/lib/linux-seamonkey/plugins/ as well as > $HOME/.mozilla/plugins yet about:plugins in seamonkey > isn't showing java support. I even tried the > diablo-jdk15 libjavaplugin_oji.so to no avail. > > Michael Since you are running a Linux binary, you have to use a Linux version of Java. Try installing one of the Linux JDK's (e.g. linux-blackdown-jdk14). Chad From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 18:43:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA5516A4CA for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:43:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ciscoaix@yahoo.com) Received: from web90613.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web90613.mail.mud.yahoo.com [216.252.100.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02AAE43F64 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:32:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ciscoaix@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 88213 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Dec 2006 18:33:39 -0000 Message-ID: <20061214183339.88210.qmail@web90613.mail.mud.yahoo.com> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=T0ZfCM2gDn+EObj+B4HY/ryiyM1KNbhEVbrgc++3Pc24EIQDZIl9fwRJLl/8KIIsSBm7Y58FP7Xo8vPM4TqjegS2OIFSpQE85XmorajhHKjnouCExZZq8g4wF1J9U3/hdpCKdbCj+OOhOBvikCJOUr0cj4cj58bgfqzuht2PCw4=; X-YMail-OSG: pg.qnoEVM1mqetMJapxSlExMl5aVSI2iiCyOUE5djVRedZP.DDF2aZ4xDocwyZ.pnd2biKflV1Rl.YswxJTeOMk1ootUkQBzYfpRF_kE21waFAleqSZXIWktRNjVyCb5rcmeBLzVnxAEYEjM8AHGqJqm6ushSQC6uTODmfmQi6cnsiUMmMm.v_CUGt4zPpVv.uHwsIUm2uWh7J4- Received: from [198.237.17.1] by web90613.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:33:39 PST Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:33:39 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Anderson To: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: DarwinStreamingServer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:43:05 -0000 Hey there folks, Is anybody using the port DarwinStreamingServer? Got the beast installed, easy enough. Problem is that when creating mp3 playlist it reports an error has occured. Check the error logs and there's no entry. Tried converting the mp3s to mp4s (using Nero's media converter) and use Media playlist but it doesn't like that either. Help is greatly appreciated. Thanks. :) ____________________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over 1 million songs. http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 18:47:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F5AC16A4FB for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:47:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 55B014404D for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:41:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2006 18:42:48 -0000 Received: from ip176-173-59-62.adsl.versatel.nl (EHLO [192.168.5.5]) [62.59.173.176] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 14 Dec 2006 19:42:48 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25365336 Message-ID: <45819B33.5020501@gmx.net> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:42:59 +0100 From: Frank Staals User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Subject: nfs_client_enable="YES" usage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:47:48 -0000 I am running a nfs-client and nfs-server here for quite some time and I'm very happy about it. The client is my laptop ( running 6.1-RELEASE ) and the server a 6.0-STABLE machine. I have enabled nfs_client with nfs_client_enable="YES" on my FreeBSD laptop as stated in the handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-nfs.html allthough when I'm not at home I notice FreeBSD halting during boot after "NFS access cache time=2" , when I hit ctrl+c it continues fine. Since I always mount my NFS dirs manually I started wondering about how usefull the entry in /etc/rc.conf was. So I quoted out nfs_client_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf and I still could mount my nfs dirs perfectly So my question was: Is the entry in rc.conf only needed when mounting a nfs dir at boot ? or is it not needed at all ( since my test proved it isn't needed when you mount the dirs manually after boot ) .. now I have yet to figure out why my ndis NIC won't work when disableing nfs_client :S .... -- -Frank Staals From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 18:50:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7642516A40F for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:50:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2788943E8F for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:44:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so298189nzh for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:46:12 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=tyRprQzXqtCCOn0ZA6nU6vGXztIf74pcRiP9Tf3gZwBKBnaCyByiqbq5HoN0qkk9xqDF+lDozrGGvaDbvXxq6oKrNQOBvkqRdQ6+0riQWTuMDaLz/6NPRRPDorZ4xKYJRA7M7W04WanbqY4om99TVM7d1UPAyaRJPBRjU8BQdq8= Received: by 10.65.154.4 with SMTP id g4mr1974084qbo.1166121972653; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:46:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.75.14 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:46:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <17489c7a0612141046vbafc98dw482896a33fcb8d67@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:46:12 -0500 From: "Chad Gross" To: "Frank Staals" In-Reply-To: <45819393.20700@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <45819393.20700@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Getting a list of dependencies which have to be installed ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:50:28 -0000 On 12/14/06, Frank Staals wrote: > > Hey..., > > Is there a utility to display the dependencies of a port which have yet > to be installed ? I know you can get a complete dependency list on > freebsd.org/ports , pkg_info -r or just looking in the files in the > ports dir. But is there a command to display only the dependencies which > haven't been installed on your system yet ? I also looked at pkg_add -n > but it immediately starts fetching the packages needed. I don't want to > start downloading the complete package just because I want a list of > ports I haven't installed yet. > > Or is the only way making a diff between the pkg_info -r output and your > pkg_info -a ? If so : Is there a way to tell pkg_info when using the -r > flag on a not-yet-installed-port to only get a list of the dependencies > instead of downloading the complete package ? Or is there just an other > utility which can display this information which I'm not aware of ? > > Thanks in advance, > > -- > -Frank Staals > > > _______________________________________________ Yes, read man ports before asking : http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ports&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+6.1-RELEASE&format=html cd to the dir of the port you wish to know the dependencies of and issue one or both of these commands: *pretty-print-run-depends-list*, *pretty-print-build-depends-list* Print a list of all the compile and run dependencies, and dependencies of those dependencies. Chad From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 18:53:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED94216A4AB for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:53:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-unix@earthlink.net) Received: from pop-gadwall.atl.sa.earthlink.net (pop-gadwall.atl.sa.earthlink.net [207.69.195.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5AAE43F63 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:46:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd-unix@earthlink.net) Received: from fl-71-54-28-212.dhcp.embarqhsd.net ([71.54.28.212] helo=kt.weeeble.com) by pop-gadwall.atl.sa.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1Guvd0-0002Wu-00; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:48:23 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:48:22 -0500 From: Randy Pratt To: Frank Staals Message-Id: <20061214134822.a15e8808.bsd-unix@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <45819393.20700@gmx.net> References: <45819393.20700@gmx.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.10 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Getting a list of dependencies which have to be installed ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:53:34 -0000 On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:10:27 +0100 Frank Staals wrote: > Hey..., > > Is there a utility to display the dependencies of a port which have yet > to be installed ? I know you can get a complete dependency list on > freebsd.org/ports , pkg_info -r or just looking in the files in the > ports dir. But is there a command to display only the dependencies which > haven't been installed on your system yet ? I also looked at pkg_add -n > but it immediately starts fetching the packages needed. I don't want to > start downloading the complete package just because I want a list of > ports I haven't installed yet. > > Or is the only way making a diff between the pkg_info -r output and your > pkg_info -a ? If so : Is there a way to tell pkg_info when using the -r > flag on a not-yet-installed-port to only get a list of the dependencies > instead of downloading the complete package ? Or is there just an other > utility which can display this information which I'm not aware of ? I don't know of a utility that does that function. Like you, I often want to know what I'm committing to when installing a new port so I wrote a small script to do just that: what_do_i_need.sh ================================================================= #!/bin/sh #List needed ports not already installed portsdir="`make -V PORTSDIR`" pkgdbdir="`make -V PKG_DBDIR`" indexfile="`make -V INDEXFILE`" origin_list="`pwd` `make all-depends-list`" for origin in ${origin_list}; do # echo "ORIGIN: ${origin}" pkg_name="`grep "|${origin}|" ${portsdir}/${indexfile} \ | cut -d "|" -f 1`" padding=$(( 50 - `echo "${origin}" | wc -c` +1)) if [ ! -e "${pkgdbdir}/${pkg_name}" ]; then printf " NEED: ${origin}%${padding}c${pkg_name}\n" " " fi done ================================================================= Put it in your path somewhere, chmod to executable and use like: # cd xawtv # what_do_i_need.sh NEED: /usr/ports/multimedia/xawtv xawtv-3.95_1 NEED: /usr/ports/x11-fonts/tv-fonts tv-fonts-1.1 It will only list the needed ports butyou can modify it to do as you want. Its probably a wise idea to make sure all ports have been updated to match your ports tree. HTH, Randy -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 19:02:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B3F16A5CB for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:02:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.robillard@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF21743D6B for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:00:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.robillard@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so532166uge for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:02:15 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=WyuovYPoJ88UZlugIx3kgUkplDh8S/d1xLGv1bzkfDI1X/4tp9Uc4S6VY4Kou506GbmnN06sl2Bqegq+ueRThofnqM1wiONi46d1HQ0EFe1IeLQhHakLgoDSkdxe6BVqtsWAx5usKNVqzCUxSyFDEoCBGDdGvgUr6/Bt2p88kmc= Received: by 10.66.221.6 with SMTP id t6mr1923466ugg.1166122934902; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:02:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.106.17 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:02:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <226ae0c60612141102v6eeb44b3t83e7cf6d8ea7eefa@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:02:14 -0500 From: "David Robillard" To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: remote syslog to specific file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:02:56 -0000 > Hello, > > > I am trying to log my sonicwall FW log to a specific file=85 > > For the moment all logs are sent to /var/log/messages > > I would like them to go to /var/log/sonic.log > > > I have tried couple of things which does not seem to work, among them : > > > +fw.xxx.yyy > > local0.*=09=09/var/log/sonic.log > > +@ > --> not working > > > local0.*=09=09/var/log/sonic.log > --> not working either > > > In /var/log/messages my log are of that format : > > > Dec 14 14:50:49 fw id=3Dfirewall sn=3D0006Bxxx4D6C time=3D"2006-12-14 > > 14:50:45" fw=3D80.98.206.97 pri=3D5 c=3D64 m=3D36 msg=3D"TCP connection > > dropped" n=3D183 src=3D80.97.99.70:3763:WAN:89-90-99-70.pde.norby.ee > > dst=3D192.168.2.3:135:LAN:newmail.rmm.fr proto=3Dtcp/135 > > > > Any help would be welcome. Try installing those two lines in your syslog.conf(5) file and make sure you use TAB instead of spaces. !fw *.* /var/log/sonic.log Then issue a `sudo touch /var/log/sonic.log` as the file must exist before syslogd(8) can write to it (i.e. syslogd(8) does not create files). After this run `sudo /etc/rc.d/syslogd restart` to instruct syslogd(8) of the changes you've made to syslog.conf(5). Finally, make sure you edit newsyslog.conf(5) with something like this to keep your /var file system from filling up. /var/log/sonic.log www:wheel 640 7 100 * J man newsyslog.conf for more on newsyslog.conf(5)'s syntax. Cheers, David --=20 David Robillard UNIX systems administrator & Oracle DBA CISSP, RHCE & Sun Certified Security Administrator Montreal: +1 514 966 0122 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 19:02:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD7516A61C for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:02:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jwm-freebsd-questions@sentinelchicken.net) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B086E43CA5 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:01:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jwm-freebsd-questions@sentinelchicken.net) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 14 Dec 2006 14:02:47 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id MQV69993; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:02:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from 207-172-209-180.c3-0.bkl-ubr2.sbo-bkl.ma.static.cable.rcn.com (HELO sentinelchicken.net) ([207.172.209.180]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with SMTP; 14 Dec 2006 14:02:25 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.12,170,1165208400"; d="scan'208"; a="333192453:sNHT28795108" Received: (qmail 35002 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2006 19:02:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crichton.skepsi.net) (10.0.0.101) by aeryn.skepsi.net with SMTP; 14 Dec 2006 19:02:24 -0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 34999 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:02:24 -0000 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:02:24 -0500 From: Jason Morgan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061214190224.GD31981@sentinelchicken.net> References: <458177D2.1040901@cupid.com> <20061214114153.68702c67@vixen42> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061214114153.68702c67@vixen42> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-Junkmail-Status: score=42/50, host=mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=suspect(7), refid=str=0001.0A09020A.45819E98.0011,ss=2,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.121/2006-09-27 Subject: Re: EVGA e-Geforce 7300GT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:02:58 -0000 On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 11:41:53AM -0600, Vulpes Velox wrote: > On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:12:02 -0500 > Dan Sikorsky wrote: > > > Hey, Im planning on installing this card tonite > > > > freebsd 6.1 i386 > > > > Im using a crappy radeon x300se right now, which has the Radeon > > choice in xorgconfig, however theres no geforce choice. > > Now, I've read that nvidia is the way to go for freebsd as they > > have Drivers! > > > > so how do I go about this, I can pkg_add these drivers? and then > > how do I tune X > > to use them > > Pkg_add should be perfectly fine. Do a man on X and look at the > -configure option. From there you can easily tweak that file to your > liking. The nvidia driver for FreeBSD comes with good documentation that's fairly clear and concise. After adding the package, take a few minutes to read through the referred-to docs. You should be up and running in no time. Cheers, Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 19:13:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8506B16A4FE for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:13:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C1B6B43CBA for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:11:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2006 19:12:09 -0000 Received: from ip176-173-59-62.adsl.versatel.nl (EHLO [192.168.5.5]) [62.59.173.176] by mail.gmx.net (mp045) with SMTP; 14 Dec 2006 20:12:09 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25365336 Message-ID: <4581A216.6000009@gmx.net> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:12:22 +0100 From: Frank Staals User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chad Gross References: <45819393.20700@gmx.net> <17489c7a0612141046vbafc98dw482896a33fcb8d67@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <17489c7a0612141046vbafc98dw482896a33fcb8d67@mail.gmail.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Getting a list of dependencies which have to be installed ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:13:00 -0000 Chad Gross wrote: > > > On 12/14/06, *Frank Staals* > wrote: > > Hey..., > > Is there a utility to display the dependencies of a port which > have yet > > utility which can display this information which I'm not aware of ? > > Thanks in advance, > > -- > -Frank Staals > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Yes, read man ports before asking : > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ports&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+6.1-RELEASE&format=html > > > cd to the dir of the port you wish to know the dependencies of and > issue one or both of these commands: > > *pretty-print-run-depends-list*, *pretty-print-build-depends-list* > Print a list of all the compile and run dependencies, > and dependencies of those dependencies. > > Chad > By running those commands you just get the complete dependency list of the port, that was not what I was asking for: I only wanted it to display the dependencies I don't have yet ...... -- -Frank Staals From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 19:47:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E405B16A53B for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:47:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brunson@brunson.com) Received: from mail.comfortechassist.com (66-162-108-54.static.twtelecom.net [66.162.108.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9E543CA4 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:44:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brunson@brunson.com) Received: by mail.comfortechassist.com (Postfix, from userid 509) id 81C7C11A0039; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:46:09 -0700 (MST) Received: from [172.20.31.94] (unknown [12.109.229.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.comfortechassist.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E75E311A003B for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:46:05 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <4581A9FD.1060301@brunson.com> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:46:05 -0700 From: Eric Brunson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.6 (2005-12-07) on s4.comfortechassist.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham version=3.0.6 Subject: Upgrade a binary package X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:47:29 -0000 I've been searching the manual and the man pages, but I can't seem to find a command to update an installed package to a newer version. I always get a message like this: pkg_add: package 'expect-5.43.0_1' or its older version already installed I only find info on "pkg_add" and "pkg_delete" for binary packages, the only references to updating a package give directions on how to use the ports tree. Is there a way to update an installed package with a newer version? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 19:48:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86ECA16A4B3 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:48:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from wmptl.net (mail.wmptl.com [216.8.159.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6628843CE7 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:46:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from [10.0.0.104] (r3140ca.wmptl.net [10.0.0.104]) by wmptl.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBEJlZC3090653 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:47:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Message-ID: <4581AA59.8060703@wmptl.com> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:47:37 -0500 From: Nathan Vidican User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061027) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 10.0.0.80 Cc: Subject: key differences between Darwin & FreeBSD; Darwin & Mac OSX ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:48:35 -0000 I know there there may be more appropriate places to post and/or ask, and I'm not asking for an advanced technical difference in terms of code or anything... but does anyone know some of the key differences between Darwin and FreeBSD, and/or the differences between Darwin and Mac OSX ? What does darwin offer that FreeBSD doesn't? Similarily, what does OSX offer that Darwin doesn't? Any ideas, comments, suggestions, rtfm-referrals, and or links would be greatly appreciated. -- Nathan Vidican nvidican@wmptl.com (member of questions@freebsd.org, no need to cc) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 19:56:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC5316A4AB for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:56:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.192.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B8243CC1 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:53:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [208.206.151.59] (host59.gtisd.com?[208.206.151.59]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20061214195513m11003886qe>; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:55:13 +0000 Message-ID: <4581AC20.4030305@computer.org> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:55:12 -0600 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061111) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Staals References: <45819393.20700@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <45819393.20700@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Getting a list of dependencies which have to be installed ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:56:03 -0000 On 12/14/2006 12:10, Frank Staals wrote: > Hey..., > > Is there a utility to display the dependencies of a port which have yet > to be installed ? I know you can get a complete dependency list on > freebsd.org/ports , pkg_info -r or just looking in the files in the > ports dir. But is there a command to display only the dependencies which > haven't been installed on your system yet ? I also looked at pkg_add -n > but it immediately starts fetching the packages needed. I don't want to > start downloading the complete package just because I want a list of > ports I haven't installed yet. > > Or is the only way making a diff between the pkg_info -r output and your > pkg_info -a ? If so : Is there a way to tell pkg_info when using the -r > flag on a not-yet-installed-port to only get a list of the dependencies > instead of downloading the complete package ? Or is there just an other > utility which can display this information which I'm not aware of ? > > Thanks in advance, > I needed this functionality, so I wrote a script... and sent it to the list for thoughts and opinions. After a few folks chipped in... this is what we had. Try the following (mind any wrapping): #! /bin/sh # Script to determine the differences between what is necessary for # a port, and what is already present on the local machine. awkprgt='{ count = 0 pkgs = "" for(i=5; i<=NF-2; i++) { pkg = $i # the "if" is here to hack it around when you get: # This port requires package(s) "" to build. if (pkg != "\"\"") { if (index(pkg, "\"") == 1) {pkg = substr(pkg, 2, length(pkg)-1)} if (index(pkg, "\"") > 1) {pkg = substr(pkg, 1, length(pkg)-1)} if ( system("pkg_info -e " pkg) == 1) { pkgs = pkgs " " pkg count++ } } } if ( count ) { printf "You need the following %d (%typ) perequisites:", count print pkgs } else { print "All (%typ) prerequisites are present." } } END { # triggered, eg., by audio/artswrapper (on my box, at least) if( ! FNR) { print "Bogus (empty) %s dependency information" } } ' awkit() { # Resolve "%s"-s via sed is a blunt hack # but good enough here and thus we don't have # to care about the number of occurrences awk "`echo "$awkprgt" | sed s/%typ/$1/g`" } make pretty-print-build-depends-list | awkit build make pretty-print-run-depends-list | awkit run ### End Script HTH. I use it all the time. -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 20:11:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A80016A4A0 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:11:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 268B643DB6 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:09:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9550A1A4D98; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:11:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 067125144C; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:11:31 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:11:30 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Eric Brunson Message-ID: <20061214201130.GA96791@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <4581A9FD.1060301@brunson.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4581A9FD.1060301@brunson.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade a binary package X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:11:58 -0000 --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 12:46:05PM -0700, Eric Brunson wrote: > I've been searching the manual and the man pages, but I can't seem to=20 > find a command to update an installed package to a newer version. I=20 > always get a message like this: >=20 > pkg_add: package 'expect-5.43.0_1' or its older version already installed >=20 > I only find info on "pkg_add" and "pkg_delete" for binary packages, the= =20 > only references to updating a package give directions on how to use the= =20 > ports tree. >=20 > Is there a way to update an installed package with a newer version? sysutils/portupgrade is the usual tool. I think portmaster can do this too. Kris --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFga/yWry0BWjoQKURAry4AKCeAk592maCiWrYgRC45JlgTlAakwCgpSXT BFN5VLM0QqqVOP95V6BfuZQ= =8IM0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 20:12:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8812016A585 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:12:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@qwirky.net) Received: from public.aci.on.ca (aci.on.ca [205.207.148.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64D1E43D6B for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:10:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@qwirky.net) Received: from [24.137.207.248] (xtreme-48-248.dyn.aci.on.ca[24.137.207.248] port=1762) by public.aci.on.ca([205.207.148.252] port=25) via TCP with esmtp (2022 bytes) (sender: ) id for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:12:24 -0500 (EST) (Smail-3.2.0.122-Pre 2005-Nov-17 #1 built 2006-Feb-21) Message-ID: <4581B095.2060101@qwirky.net> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:14:13 -0500 From: Jeff Royle User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Staals References: <45819B33.5020501@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <45819B33.5020501@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: nfs_client_enable="YES" usage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:12:49 -0000 Frank Staals wrote: > I am running a nfs-client and nfs-server here for quite some time and > I'm very happy about it. The client is my laptop ( running 6.1-RELEASE > ) and the server a 6.0-STABLE machine. I have enabled nfs_client with > nfs_client_enable="YES" on my FreeBSD laptop as stated in the > handbook: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-nfs.html > allthough when I'm not at home I notice FreeBSD halting during boot > after "NFS access cache time=2" , when I hit ctrl+c it continues fine. > Since I always mount my NFS dirs manually I started wondering about > how usefull the entry in /etc/rc.conf was. So I quoted out > nfs_client_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf and I still could mount my nfs > dirs perfectly > > So my question was: Is the entry in rc.conf only needed when mounting > a nfs dir at boot ? or is it not needed at all ( since my test proved > it isn't needed when you mount the dirs manually after boot ) > Referenced from man rc.conf ... nfs_client_enable - If set to YES run the NFS client daemons at boot time. You would need this option enabled to connect to a NFS server on boot, otherwise it is not needed. > .. now I have yet to figure out why my ndis NIC won't work when > disableing nfs_client :S .... > > Cheers, Jeff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 20:54:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFAB16A75C for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:54:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@childeric.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D496F43E7C for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:46:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@childeric.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from [172.23.170.145] (helo=anti-virus03-08) by smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GuxUs-0003j9-9V; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:48:06 +0000 Received: from [82.35.115.93] (helo=[192.168.10.60]) by asmtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1GuxUr-0007uH-9A; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:48:05 +0000 Message-ID: <4581B883.4050703@childeric.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:48:03 +0000 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060417) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Staals References: <45819393.20700@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <45819393.20700@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Getting a list of dependencies which have to be installed ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:54:06 -0000 Frank Staals wrote: > Hey..., > > Is there a utility to display the dependencies of a port which have yet > to be installed ? I know you can get a complete dependency list on > freebsd.org/ports , pkg_info -r or just looking in the files in the > ports dir. But is there a command to display only the dependencies which > haven't been installed on your system yet ? I also looked at pkg_add -n > but it immediately starts fetching the packages needed. I don't want to > start downloading the complete package just because I want a list of > ports I haven't installed yet. Hi Frank, It's not exactly what you want but at least it contains what you want: portmanager -s displays the status of each port including missing dependencies. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 20:56:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C32116A551 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:56:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from achilles.leela.ws (achilles.leela.ws [66.207.162.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7620043DA5 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:53:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.0.193] ([158.145.111.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by achilles.leela.ws (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBEKsm1I045131 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:54:49 -0900 (AKST) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Message-ID: <4581BA1A.8030808@mac.com> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:54:50 -0900 From: "Peter A. Giessel" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061025 Thunderbird/1.5.0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org References: <4581AA59.8060703@wmptl.com> In-Reply-To: <4581AA59.8060703@wmptl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: key differences between Darwin & FreeBSD; Darwin & Mac OSX ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:56:25 -0000 On 2006/12/14 10:47, Nathan Vidican seems to have typed: > What does darwin offer that FreeBSD doesn't? Similarily, what does OSX > offer that Darwin doesn't? Apple answers your questions here: http://developer.apple.com/opensource/faq.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 20:56:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D225516A588 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:56:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.238]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDBD243E09 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:54:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so319454nzh for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:55:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.151.6 with SMTP id d6mr2220546qbo.1166129737023; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:55:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q15sm3184146qbq.2006.12.14.12.55.36; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:55:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138F6B892; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:55:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (boss.seibercom.net [192.168.0.4]) (Authenticated sender: gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 794C8B827; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:55:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:55:52 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: User Questions Organization: Seibercom.NET In-Reply-To: <20061214201130.GA96791@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <4581A9FD.1060301@brunson.com> <20061214201130.GA96791@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20061214155438.DC4C.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.29 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: Upgrade a binary package X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: User Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:56:28 -0000 On Thursday December 14, 2006 at 03:11:30 (PM) Kris Kennaway wrote: > > I've been searching the manual and the man pages, but I can't seem to > > find a command to update an installed package to a newer version. I > > always get a message like this: > > > > pkg_add: package 'expect-5.43.0_1' or its older version already installed > > > > I only find info on "pkg_add" and "pkg_delete" for binary packages, the > > only references to updating a package give directions on how to use the > > ports tree. > > > > Is there a way to update an installed package with a newer version? > > sysutils/portupgrade is the usual tool. I think portmaster can do this too. portmanager lang/expect -l -- Gerard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 20:56:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46DB16A57E for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:56:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rw@gumby.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98EDA43CF5 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:54:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rw@gumby.homeunix.com) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [IPv6:::1]) by gumby.homeunix.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBEKtn0v003892 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:55:51 GMT (envelope-from rw@gumby.homeunix.com) From: rw To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:55:48 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <4581AA59.8060703@wmptl.com> In-Reply-To: <4581AA59.8060703@wmptl.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612142055.48674.rw@gumby.homeunix.com> Subject: Re: key differences between Darwin & FreeBSD; Darwin & Mac OSX ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:56:29 -0000 On Thursday 14 December 2006 19:47, Nathan Vidican wrote: > I know there there may be more appropriate places to post and/or ask, > and I'm not asking for an advanced technical difference in terms of code > or anything... but does anyone know some of the key differences between > Darwin and FreeBSD, and/or the differences between Darwin and Mac OSX ? > What does darwin offer that FreeBSD doesn't? Similarily, what does OSX > offer that Darwin doesn't? > > Any ideas, comments, suggestions, rtfm-referrals, and or links would be > greatly appreciated. Google will give you any number of discussions on this subject. See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_(operating_system) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 21:06:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B35016A416 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:06:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.hill@yournetplus.com) Received: from admin.mwci.net (cgate.yournetplus.com [162.42.148.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB5C43CBA for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:04:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from d.hill@yournetplus.com) Received: from [65.124.230.214] (account d.hill@yournetplus.com) by admin.mwci.net (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.8) with HTTP id 78853324; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:05:11 +0000 From: To: Bill Moran ,d.hill@yournetplus.com X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.8 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:05:11 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20061214132016.a37d2b7b.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PowerEdge 6850 Install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:06:45 -0000 Many thanks to your quick response. Everything is in working order. The install and kernel rebuild for SMP took all of about 20 minutes with rebooting. On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:20:16 -0500 Bill Moran wrote: >In response to d.hill@yournetplus.com: > >> I've got an issue with getting FreeBSD to recognize past >> four gigs of ram. The server we have has 12 gig. I am >>able >> to successfully recompile the kernel and get the four >> CPU's to show up that are installed in the server. >> >> I've taken and attempted to compile the PAE kernel file >> and every time the server attempts to boot to the >>default >> option on the standard boot menu, the server reboots >> itself. This is a continuous cycle. > >One of the required drivers probably doesn't work right >with PAE. >I don't know how well PAE is supported anymore, now that >amd64 >is stable. > >> Can anyone direct me to what I need to do for having the >> server recognize all 12 gig? I've seen threads on using >> the ia64 install, however the install notes state it is >> for the Itanium and Itanium 2 CPU's. Attempting to boot >> from the first ISO CD doesn't do anything. > >You want the amd64 version. > >-- >Bill Moran >Collaborative Fusion Inc. > >wmoran@collaborativefusion.com >Phone: 412-422-3463x4023 >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 21:15:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1425316A412 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:15:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2849043CBD for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:13:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:14:53 -0500 id 00056407.4581BECD.00003D24 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:14:50 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: "Peter Grigor" Message-Id: <20061214161450.f42b7cfe.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> References: <20061214101951.269c6303.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dell 2950 & 1950 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:15:24 -0000 In response to "Peter Grigor" : > > I looked through the archives and couldn't find much information on the > megarc problem. Have you gotten any feedback on whether a megarc fix is > forthcoming in the 6.x branch? That's because megarc isn't relevant to the problem, really. The x9xx series uses a newer RAID controller that doesn't use the same driver and is incompatible with megarc. My point is that there's no equiv at this time. > BTW, are you in Pittsburgh too? :) Yes. > On 12/14/06, Bill Moran wrote: > > > > In response to "Peter Grigor" : > > > > > I've just gotten some quotes on a few dell machines and I was wondering > > now > > > if freebsd 6.x is able to run on them properly. Perc/5i cards and 64-bit > > > Intel chips are my worries :) > > > > > > Anyone have any experiences they'd like to share? Anyone successfully > > > running mysql on an IA64 architecture with Freebsd? > > > > We're in the early stages of deployment with these. None of them are > > actually in production yet, but we're in the final stages of putting > > them there. > > > > 6.1 doesn't work with the onboard NICS -- you have to get a 6.2-RC > > or wait for 6.2. Otherwise, everything 64-bit works as far as we > > can tell. We're a little grumpy that we don't have any way to > > monitor the RAID (our Dell x850 systems use megarc to automatically > > signal us if a drive fails) We've also had occasional problems > > with the reboot and shutdown commands not completing, but it's been > > so intermittent that we can't seem to isolate the cause. Symptom > > is that it gets to the final stage of reboot/shutdown and then waits > > indefinitely without issuing the final ACPI command. > > > > Do some searches on my name and/or those topics on the stable@ > > list archives for more details. > > > > -- > > Bill Moran > > Collaborative Fusion Inc. > > > > wmoran@collaborativefusion.com > > Phone: 412-422-3463x4023 > > > > > > -- > Peter Grigor > Hoobly Inc > http://www.hoobly.com > -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. wmoran@collaborativefusion.com Phone: 412-422-3463x4023 **************************************************************** IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. **************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 21:27:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38CC016A4C2 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:27:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hh@dsgx.org) Received: from mail3.dsgx.org (mail3.dsgx.org [208.98.1.104]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F3B43CC6 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:25:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hh@dsgx.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.dsgx.org [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.dsgx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5ADB7F3298 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:26:15 -0200 (BRST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (201-34-245-1.cbace700.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br [201.34.245.1]) by mail3.dsgx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFCF7F31AA for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:26:11 -0200 (BRST) Message-ID: <4581B397.8050901@dsgx.org> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:27:03 -0200 From: Suporte Dsgx User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0658-1, 14/12/2006), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS 0.3.12 Subject: error trying to compile /usr/src X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:27:26 -0000 im trying to compile freebsd 4.10 P24 but on the make world gives me this error cd /usr/src/etc; install -o root -g wheel -m 444 amd.map apmd.conf auth.conf crontab csh.cshrc csh.login csh.logout dhclient.conf dm.conf fbtab ftpusers gettytab group hosts hosts.allow host.conf hosts.equiv hosts.lpd inetd.conf login.access login.conf motd modems networks newsyslog.conf pam.conf phones printcap profile protocols rc rc.atm rc.diskless1 rc.diskless2 rc.firewall rc.firewall6 rc.network rc.network6 rc.pccard rc.sendmail rc.serial rc.shutdown rc.syscons rc.sysctl remote rpc services shells sysctl.conf syslog.conf usbd.conf etc.i386/disktab etc.i386/rc.i386 etc.i386/ttys /usr/src/etc/../gnu/usr.bin/man/manpath/manpath.config /usr/src/etc/../usr.bin/mail/misc/mail.rc /usr/src/etc/../usr.bin/locate/locate/locate.rc rc.isdn netstart pccard_ether rc.suspend rc.resume nsmb.conf opieaccess /usr/share/examples/etc cd /usr/src/etc/defaults; install -o root -g wheel -m 444 rc.conf make.conf pccard.conf periodic.conf /usr/share/examples/etc/defaults make: don't know how to make copies. Stop *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/src/share. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. -- what can it be and how to fix it ? thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 21:58:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC8D016A4CA for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:58:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmanfffreak@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc3-s32.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc3-s32.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419E243D6A for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:54:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmanfffreak@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.250.17]) by bay0-omc3-s32.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:56:18 -0800 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:56:18 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.250.200 by by115fd.bay115.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:56:16 GMT X-Originating-IP: [75.56.61.210] X-Originating-Email: [jmanfffreak@hotmail.com] X-Sender: jmanfffreak@hotmail.com From: "john Mish III" To: questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:56:16 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Dec 2006 21:56:18.0068 (UTC) FILETIME=[AED94D40:01C71FCA] Cc: Subject: Externally connecting to databases? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:58:42 -0000 I have mysqld installed (4.1) on my FreeBSD 6.1 box. I need a totally different box to connect to those databases through PHP scripts. I've already tried editing hosts.allow in the /etc/ folder, but no effect. Does FreeBSD need to be restarted after these changes are done, or just inetd, cause I've tried inetd forcerestart, but it does nothing. When I run my PHP script, it waits a couple seconds, then shows a completly blank page. _________________________________________________________________ View Athlete’s Collections with Live Search http://sportmaps.live.com/index.html?source=hmemailtaglinenov06&FORM=MGAC01 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 22:29:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82FC816A47C for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:29:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from PUpchurch@houston.oilfield.slb.com) Received: from usxsl082.slb.atosorigin-asp.com (usxsl082.slb.atosorigin-asp.com [199.6.139.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA59943CD2 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:24:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from PUpchurch@houston.oilfield.slb.com) Received: from pmxchannel_int-daemon.usxsl082.slb.atosorigin-asp.com by usxsl082.slb.atosorigin-asp.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-1 (built Feb 24 2005)) id <0JAA00B0JBNKNZ00@usxsl082.slb.atosorigin-asp.com> for questions@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:26:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from usxsl052.slb.atosorigin-asp.com (usxsl052dmz.slb.atosorigin-asp.com [199.6.139.167]) by usxsl082.slb.atosorigin-asp.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-1 (built Feb 24 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JAA0088QBNARPD0@usxsl082.slb.atosorigin-asp.com> for questions@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:25:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.us085mbx01.slb.atosorigin-asp.com by us085mbx01.slb.atosorigin-asp.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-1 (built Feb 24 2005)) id <0JAA00E0HBMLUZ00@us085mbx01.slb.atosorigin-asp.com> for questions@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:25:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from DAEDELUS.houston.oilfield.slb.com ([192.23.85.106]) by us085mbx01.slb.atosorigin-asp.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-1 (built Feb 24 2005)) with ESMTPSA id <0JAA00C0LBMJ9UQ1@us085mbx01.slb.atosorigin-asp.com> for questions@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:25:31 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:25:06 -0600 From: Phillip Upchurch To: questions@FreeBSD.org Message-id: <7.0.1.0.2.20061214162215.04e75068@houston.oilfield.slb.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Cc: Subject: Legato Client for freeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:29:56 -0000 I am running Legato on a sun server. I have a server running freeBSD that needs the legato backup client installed. Is there a working legato client for freeBSD ?? Thanks Phil Upchurch 713 513 1143 Schlumberger Houston EMC Server Ops Team From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 22:39:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE21A16A47C for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:39:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665E143EF4 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:32:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [10.35.4.65] (65.4-35-10-static.chueca.wifi [10.35.4.65]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C052E024; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:34:12 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4581D0D7.7030501@locolomo.org> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:31:51 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fabian Keil References: <457C686E.5050504@locolomo.org> <20061214132434.5ac20b82@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20061214132434.5ac20b82@localhost> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms060506040304000805070702" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How safe is encrypted disks? (data integrity) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:39:08 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms060506040304000805070702 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Fabian Keil wrote: > Erik Norgaard wrote: > >> I have been thinking to make /home on my laptop encrypted - seems like a >> good idea if it gets stolen. Now, how safe is this? Not in terms of the >> strength of the encryption algorithm, but in terms of integrity. > > I have no insight on the code, but as nobody else answered, > my response may be better than nothing. > >> What happens in case of power failure, the battery runs out or system >> crashes for whatever reason? > > I have my home slice encrypted with GELI for several month now > and so far I didn't notice any effects on the data integrity. > > I experienced several system crashes and one or two power failures > do to empty battery but I didn't lose any data already saved > on the disk (that I know of). > > The only inconvenience is that the system boots to single-user > mode if the home slice isn't clean and I then have to fsck it > manually. > > At that point the password for the key is already entered, > so I'm not sure why the slice can't be fscked automatically. > It could be the .eli extension, but I didn't investigate this > any further. Thanks, reading man-pages and stuff I think I have understood that sectors are encrypted individually, so errors in one sector does not affect the decryption of other sectors. Is this correctly understood? It's a mess though if you have to manually run fsck. I can't figure out why either: if you have attached the device it ought to be transparrent. The geli man-page claims you can even encrypt the root device - wonder how fsck will work then... Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org --------------ms060506040304000805070702 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIK6DCC BXAwggRYoAMCAQICBEVUK6IwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwMTELMAkGA1UEBhMCREsxDDAKBgNV BAoTA1REQzEUMBIGA1UEAxMLVERDIE9DRVMgQ0EwHhcNMDYxMTE1MDgzMTU0WhcNMDgxMTE1 MDkwMTU0WjB1MQswCQYDVQQGEwJESzEpMCcGA1UEChMgSW5nZW4gb3JnYW5pc2F0b3Jpc2sg dGlsa255dG5pbmcxOzAUBgNVBAMUDUVyaWsgTvhyZ2FhcmQwIwYDVQQFExxQSUQ6OTgwMi0y MDAyLTItNTQ0MzY5NzY5MzE1MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQC1/K6+GVcF UvoWJpyfhzWbu8qEOB8jU17A0dpmts7RT+ODkYq0lxJCcvvdSXNQQurvYwaPISA+EMRy+rIm rjhoyxhsM9w/XC7gELqkr1XbGt3wR0KLr5ZcRfD4HqrWM1Eh1OYxTXKod6Ox/FAqzDAy91x8 XCZzsHtiBCdgMSYxqwIDAQABo4ICzjCCAsowDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgP4MCsGA1UdEAQkMCKA DzIwMDYxMTE1MDgzMTU0WoEPMjAwODExMTUwOTAxNTRaMIIBNwYDVR0gBIIBLjCCASowggEm BgoqgVCBKQEBAQEDMIIBFjAvBggrBgEFBQcCARYjaHR0cDovL3d3dy5jZXJ0aWZpa2F0LmRr L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkwgeIGCCsGAQUFBwICMIHVMAoWA1REQzADAgEBGoHGRm9yIGFudmVuZGVs c2UgYWYgY2VydGlmaWthdGV0IGfmbGRlciBPQ0VTIHZpbGvlciwgQ1BTIG9nIE9DRVMgQ1As IGRlciBrYW4gaGVudGVzIGZyYSB3d3cuY2VydGlmaWthdC5kay9yZXBvc2l0b3J5LiBCZW3m cmssIGF0IFREQyBlZnRlciB2aWxr5XJlbmUgaGFyIGV0IGJlZ3LmbnNldCBhbnN2YXIgaWZ0 LiBwcm9mZXNzaW9uZWxsZSBwYXJ0ZXIuMEEGCCsGAQUFBwEBBDUwMzAxBggrBgEFBQcwAYYl aHR0cDovL29jc3AuY2VydGlmaWthdC5kay9vY3NwL3N0YXR1czAgBgNVHREEGTAXgRVub3Jn YWFyZEBsb2NvbG9tby5vcmcwgYQGA1UdHwR9MHswS6BJoEekRTBDMQswCQYDVQQGEwJESzEM MAoGA1UEChMDVERDMRQwEgYDVQQDEwtUREMgT0NFUyBDQTEQMA4GA1UEAxMHQ1JMMTU1NzAs oCqgKIYmaHR0cDovL2NybC5vY2VzLmNlcnRpZmlrYXQuZGsvb2Nlcy5jcmwwHwYDVR0jBBgw FoAUYLWF7FZkfhIZJ2cdUBVLc647+RIwHQYDVR0OBBYEFPd+a0ceJ9JmK934UXsB3G0mjv+f MAkGA1UdEwQCMAAwGQYJKoZIhvZ9B0EABAwwChsEVjcuMQMCA6gwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAD ggEBAE9KhX+l/ZcnhvGPhHyWnJspyCXSiuqZ+GlgMdcKXtlu8kXsqNzfDe9qSs93++zJS+HT vAW0QgyIxjY1VpgCqgyjU8e2d2D1eSRMDB09WViZk8oZkvOy0Mq3yy//CLSw3gQbXNZF+Yt+ htss+FD+idACVyRBQqlcHuaxjguyzZkK0fGBN5H5nsklDySQCU7X0i3egeIiL7zlV3cjp9KT 12tNG4jfQTaSUzBkz0R+x+Jcdyp6AI9Qg3H1iGDDI58aCTY5ohQBpDsUcLr6U842IACNCeub qDP6nDo5lnMEXwGH/RO8r4supCf5wrNRjqEX/vokUzB5QfDGtmxxZkycaaQwggVwMIIEWKAD AgECAgRFVCuiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMDExCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRLMQwwCgYDVQQKEwNUREMx FDASBgNVBAMTC1REQyBPQ0VTIENBMB4XDTA2MTExNTA4MzE1NFoXDTA4MTExNTA5MDE1NFow dTELMAkGA1UEBhMCREsxKTAnBgNVBAoTIEluZ2VuIG9yZ2FuaXNhdG9yaXNrIHRpbGtueXRu aW5nMTswFAYDVQQDFA1FcmlrIE74cmdhYXJkMCMGA1UEBRMcUElEOjk4MDItMjAwMi0yLTU0 NDM2OTc2OTMxNTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAtfyuvhlXBVL6Fiacn4c1 m7vKhDgfI1NewNHaZrbO0U/jg5GKtJcSQnL73UlzUELq72MGjyEgPhDEcvqyJq44aMsYbDPc P1wu4BC6pK9V2xrd8EdCi6+WXEXw+B6q1jNRIdTmMU1yqHejsfxQKswwMvdcfFwmc7B7YgQn YDEmMasCAwEAAaOCAs4wggLKMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwID+DArBgNVHRAEJDAigA8yMDA2MTEx NTA4MzE1NFqBDzIwMDgxMTE1MDkwMTU0WjCCATcGA1UdIASCAS4wggEqMIIBJgYKKoFQgSkB AQEBAzCCARYwLwYIKwYBBQUHAgEWI2h0dHA6Ly93d3cuY2VydGlmaWthdC5kay9yZXBvc2l0 b3J5MIHiBggrBgEFBQcCAjCB1TAKFgNUREMwAwIBARqBxkZvciBhbnZlbmRlbHNlIGFmIGNl cnRpZmlrYXRldCBn5mxkZXIgT0NFUyB2aWxr5XIsIENQUyBvZyBPQ0VTIENQLCBkZXIga2Fu IGhlbnRlcyBmcmEgd3d3LmNlcnRpZmlrYXQuZGsvcmVwb3NpdG9yeS4gQmVt5nJrLCBhdCBU REMgZWZ0ZXIgdmlsa+VyZW5lIGhhciBldCBiZWdy5m5zZXQgYW5zdmFyIGlmdC4gcHJvZmVz c2lvbmVsbGUgcGFydGVyLjBBBggrBgEFBQcBAQQ1MDMwMQYIKwYBBQUHMAGGJWh0dHA6Ly9v Y3NwLmNlcnRpZmlrYXQuZGsvb2NzcC9zdGF0dXMwIAYDVR0RBBkwF4EVbm9yZ2FhcmRAbG9j b2xvbW8ub3JnMIGEBgNVHR8EfTB7MEugSaBHpEUwQzELMAkGA1UEBhMCREsxDDAKBgNVBAoT A1REQzEUMBIGA1UEAxMLVERDIE9DRVMgQ0ExEDAOBgNVBAMTB0NSTDE1NTcwLKAqoCiGJmh0 dHA6Ly9jcmwub2Nlcy5jZXJ0aWZpa2F0LmRrL29jZXMuY3JsMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFGC1hexW ZH4SGSdnHVAVS3OuO/kSMB0GA1UdDgQWBBT3fmtHHifSZivd+FF7AdxtJo7/nzAJBgNVHRME AjAAMBkGCSqGSIb2fQdBAAQMMAobBFY3LjEDAgOoMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQBPSoV/ pf2XJ4bxj4R8lpybKcgl0orqmfhpYDHXCl7ZbvJF7Kjc3w3vakrPd/vsyUvh07wFtEIMiMY2 NVaYAqoMo1PHtndg9XkkTAwdPVlYmZPKGZLzstDKt8sv/wi0sN4EG1zWRfmLfobbLPhQ/onQ AlckQUKpXB7msY4Lss2ZCtHxgTeR+Z7JJQ8kkAlO19It3oHiIi+85Vd3I6fSk9drTRuI30E2 klMwZM9EfsfiXHcqegCPUINx9YhgwyOfGgk2OaIUAaQ7FHC6+lPONiAAjQnrm6gz+pw6OZZz BF8Bh/0TvK+LLqQn+cKzUY6hF/76JFMweUHwxrZscWZMnGmkMYICKjCCAiYCAQEwOTAxMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJESzEMMAoGA1UEChMDVERDMRQwEgYDVQQDEwtUREMgT0NFUyBDQQIERVQrojAJ BgUrDgMCGgUAoIIBRzAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEP Fw0wNjEyMTQyMjMxNTFaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBSkFXW3fBIH5kb4ZH03Y0QjuXVeYzBI BgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxOzA5MDExCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRLMQwwCgYDVQQKEwNUREMxFDASBgNVBAMT C1REQyBPQ0VTIENBAgRFVCuiMEoGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMTugOTAxMQswCQYDVQQGEwJESzEM MAoGA1UEChMDVERDMRQwEgYDVQQDEwtUREMgT0NFUyBDQQIERVQrojBSBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8x RTBDMAoGCCqGSIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUrDgMC BzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASBgD0l6+qW+3AVZTyEzHg24WBmzVnu sAYIaQPhQLeO1fvIRpSmM6aOkqLWvfOec21Dk8kdcqfMRCM2BolKffJtdePLiKcYI+HvdKES CRFMlt7qJ54DDB6MV2Cbv+hdrzpygqZaXkPCvgYh1+6IZwHZBqEA3JaxsC1+sPcmut9VrDiz AAAAAAAA --------------ms060506040304000805070702-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 22:44:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3996A16A75E for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:44:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from bcmelmx.bytecraft.au.com (bcmelmx.bytecraft.au.com [203.39.118.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED70D43CEC for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:38:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from svmarshal2.bytecraft.internal (svmarshal2.bytecraft.internal [10.0.0.3]) by bcmelmx.bytecraft.au.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kBEMdtcZ006361; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:39:56 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from svmailmel.bytecraft.internal (Not Verified[10.0.0.24]) by svmarshal2.bytecraft.internal with MailMarshal (v6, 1, 4, 441) id ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:39:55 +1100 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:39:54 +1100 Message-ID: <04E232FDCD9FBE43857F7066CAD3C0F1266E8C@svmailmel.bytecraft.internal> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Externally connecting to databases? thread-index: AccfzXor0Ire2iadQhuIh7quhJgpPgAAx5kg From: "Murray Taylor" To: "john Mish III" , Cc: Subject: RE: Externally connecting to databases? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:44:43 -0000 Make sure that "skip-networking" is commented out or removed from /etc/my.cnf .... You may be 'turned off' there. You will need to stop - start mysql if you change this setting. mjt=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=20 > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of=20 > john Mish III > Sent: Friday, 15 December 2006 8:56 AM > To: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Externally connecting to databases? >=20 > I have mysqld installed (4.1) on my FreeBSD 6.1 box. I need a totally=20 > different box to connect to those databases through PHP scripts. I've=20 > already tried editing hosts.allow in the /etc/ folder, but no=20 > effect. Does=20 > FreeBSD need to be restarted after these changes are done, or=20 > just inetd,=20 > cause I've tried inetd forcerestart, but it does nothing.=20 > When I run my PHP=20 > script, it waits a couple seconds, then shows a completly blank page. >=20 > _________________________________________________________________ > View Athlete's Collections with Live Search=20 > http://sportmaps.live.com/index.html?source=3Dhmemailtaglinenov0 > 6&FORM=3DMGAC01 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to=20 > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 --------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted in this e-mail is for the exclusive use of the intended addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of it, or the taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons and/or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please inform the sender and/or addressee immediately and delete the material.=20 E-mails may not be secure, may contain computer viruses and may be corrupted in transmission. Please carefully check this e-mail (and any attachment) accordingly. No warranties are given and no liability is accepted for any loss or damage caused by such matters. --------------------------------------------------------------- ### This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses by Bytecraft ### From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 22:45:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8922216A944 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:45:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (pool-71-245-104-192.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [71.245.104.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E2543E3B for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:40:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (localhost.home.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBEMfSuM013422 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:41:29 -0800 Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id kBEMfSlE013405 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:41:28 -0800 Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id WAA00195; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:37:31 GMT Message-Id: <200612142237.WAA00195@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:25:17 EST." <20061214182517.GA94080@xor.obsecurity.org> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:37:31 +0000 From: Dieter Subject: Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:45:22 -0000 > Sorry, yes. Nothing else contended for it though, so it doesn't > appear to be a source of performance problems - it is probably a > secondary effect from something else. I guess you're running some old > version of FreeBSD since those line numbers don't correspond to > anything reasonable in the current 6.x source, so I dunno what > exactly. FreeBSD 6.0 > > > The rest looks fine at a quick glance too. > >=20 > > What should I be looking for? Do I need to collect stats for a long > > period of time, or is a few seconds enough? Dd can kill the transfer > > in about 3 seconds. > > You need to make sure your sampling while the system is in the bad > state. > > A mutex that has a lot of acquisitions and a lot of contention for > those acquisitions is a performance bottleneck. Nothing below falls > into that class - in particular it's definitely not Giant causing > performance loss to the filesystem. Aren't the numbers (other than max and avg) going to depend a lot on how long I collect data? Are you looking for one or two locks that have contention a couple orders of magnitude higher than everything else? > Still looks like it's a driver and/or hardware problem, but you'd need > specialized knowledge to proceed with debugging it. Maybe I didn't beat on it hard enough. Data below is with two processes reading data from Ethernet and writing to disk. (common Ethernet, different disks) and a loop with 3 copies of dd writing from /dev/zero to disks, and then 3 copies of dd reading the files back and writing to /dev/null. This ground away for a few minutes. Writing 5 users Load 2.47 1.73 0.90 Dec 14 13:17 Mem:KB REAL VIRTUAL VN PAGER SWAP PAGER Tot Share Tot Share Free in out in out Act 868496 3520 893416 7564 176776 count All 1835548 3856 1622626k 8056 pages zfod Interrupts Proc:r p d s w Csw Trp Sys Int Sof Flt cow 4582 total 4 44 13796 4 205713128 13 676116 wire 998 0: clk 449292 act 1: atkb 32.3%Sys 31.5%Intr 0.0%User 0.0%Nice 36.2%Idl 710892 inact 32 3: sio1 | | | | | | | | | | 4024 cache 4: sio0 ================++++++++++++++++ 172752 free 7: ppc0 daefr stray 7 Namei Name-cache Dir-cache prcfr 128 8: rtc Calls hits % hits % react 79 10: ohc pdwak 3251 11: fwo pdpgs 14: ata Disks ad2 ad4 ad6 ad8 ad10 da0 cd0 intrn 94 15: ata KB/t 128 0.00 128 128 128 128 0.00 218608 buf tps 47 0 39 37 12 8 0 24 dirtybuf MB/s 5.84 0.00 4.87 4.63 1.46 0.97 0.00 100000 desiredvnodes % busy 91 0 78 69 19 8 0 917 numvnodes 522 freevnodes Reading 5 users Load 1.38 1.59 0.91 Dec 14 13:18 Mem:KB REAL VIRTUAL VN PAGER SWAP PAGER Tot Share Tot Share Free in out in out Act 868496 3520 893416 7564 61148 count All 2007260 3856 1623531k 8056 pages zfod Interrupts Proc:r p d s w Csw Trp Sys Int Sof Flt cow 4878 total 3 45 15319 5 199813154 37 675864 wire 1002 0: clk 449312 act 1: atkb 74.8%Sys 25.2%Intr 0.0%User 0.0%Nice 0.0%Idl 828676 inact 36 3: sio1 | | | | | | | | | | 58184 cache 4: sio0 =====================================+++++++++++ 2964 free 7: ppc0 daefr stray 7 Namei Name-cache Dir-cache prcfr 128 8: rtc Calls hits % hits % 313 react 253 10: ohc pdwak 3307 11: fwo pdpgs 14: ata Disks ad2 ad4 ad6 ad8 ad10 da0 cd0 intrn 152 15: ata KB/t 112 0.00 105 99.66 128 128 0.00 218400 buf tps 87 0 154 171 10 7 0 11 dirtybuf MB/s 9.52 0.00 15.81 16.64 1.22 0.85 0.00 100000 desiredvnodes % busy 14 0 45 37 17 7 0 917 numvnodes 522 freevnodes interrupt total rate irq0: clk 5582359 999 irq1: atkbd0 2 0 irq3: sio1 96973 17 irq4: sio0 702 0 irq7: ppc0 65 0 stray irq7 1 0 irq8: rtc 714413 127 irq10: ohci0 ohci1+ 154972 27 irq11: fwohci0 bge* 3104534 556 irq14: ata0 57 0 irq15: ata1 109476 19 Total 9763554 1748 Mutex stats sorted by each column after grepping out lines with 0 for both cnt_hold and cnt_lock: max total count avg cnt_hold cnt_lock name 777739 1228310 104279 11 493 22 /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/pmap.c:1562 (vm page queue mutex) 114852 371203 93626 3 205 1 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_cluster.c:387 (vnode interlock) 112622 271200 44 6163 41 0 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_pageout.c:717 (Giant) 101485 1566968 3306 473 201 2 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_synch.c:236 (Giant) 53150 9174512 3555905 2 432 103 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_lock.c:168 (lockbuilder mtxpool) 53150 2562700 676529 3 448 92 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_vnops.c:799 (vnode interlock) 39794 5458189 712768 7 215 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:3364 (vm object) 36998 1149211 146203 7 0 2 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_fault.c:295 (vm object) 28823 4952110 2239392 2 175 277 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_lock.c:570 (lockbuilder mtxpool) 27277 2278961 183643 12 646 2494 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:3082 (vm object) 209 20679080 434199 47 0 1676 /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c:742 (inp) 330 16173519 2794378 5 3428 4416 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:546 (Giant) 53150 9174512 3555905 2 432 103 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_lock.c:168 (lockbuilder mtxpool) 23947 7735265 1626257 4 143 35 /usr/src/sys/sys/buf.h:292 (lockbuilder mtxpool) 21112 6948480 1789668 3 1902 12 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:2350 (vnode interlock) 5427 5478084 1379072 3 5190 7504 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1397 (buf queue lock) 39794 5458189 712768 7 215 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:3364 (vm object) 9131 5161862 866362 5 2644 0 /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_usrreq.c:598 (tcp) 28823 4952110 2239392 2 175 277 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_lock.c:570 (lockbuilder mtxpool) 53150 9174512 3555905 2 432 103 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_lock.c:168 (lockbuilder mtxpool) 330 16173519 2794378 5 3428 4416 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:546 (Giant) 28823 4952110 2239392 2 175 277 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_lock.c:570 (lockbuilder mtxpool) 29 2928936 1830950 1 0 982 /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_taskqueue.c:158 (taskqueue) 68 2840022 1825301 1 596 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_taskqueue.c:219 (taskqueue) 21112 6948480 1789668 3 1902 12 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:2350 (vnode interlock) 23947 7735265 1626257 4 143 35 /usr/src/sys/sys/buf.h:292 (lockbuilder mtxpool) 17719 2988611 1622737 1 2 1 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_descrip.c:2100 (sleep mtxpool) 3107 2595890 1400092 1 2082 120 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:309 (needsbuffer lock) 5427 5478084 1379072 3 5190 7504 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1397 (buf queue lock) 21503 54061 5 10812 4 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c:124 (Giant) 112622 271200 44 6163 41 0 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_pageout.c:717 (Giant) 10000 32387 12 2698 2 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_condvar.c:134 (Giant) 101485 1566968 3306 473 201 2 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_synch.c:236 (Giant) 3967 6848 19 360 6 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_usrreq.c:932 (Giant) 24665 213993 771 277 14 2 /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/pmap.c:2481 (vm page queue mutex) 382 8658 35 247 1 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_linker.c:1044 (Giant) 241 19374 111 174 19 0 /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:285 (Giant) 158 5632 54 104 1 0 /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_usrreq.c:367 (inp) 9599 1452414 16256 89 660 2 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_sysctl.c:1280 (Giant) 5427 5478084 1379072 3 5190 7504 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1397 (buf queue lock) 9881 3243923 344723 9 3513 798 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1665 (buf queue lock) 330 16173519 2794378 5 3428 4416 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:546 (Giant) 9131 5161862 866362 5 2644 0 /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_usrreq.c:598 (tcp) 3107 2595890 1400092 1 2082 120 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:309 (needsbuffer lock) 21112 6948480 1789668 3 1902 12 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:2350 (vnode interlock) 3322 1550577 816324 1 1842 3565 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:351 (needsbuffer lock) 12965 4489813 201822 22 1417 216 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:2756 (vm object) 12720 1470457 393778 3 1379 59 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_page.c:805 (vm page queue mutex) 2293 1211654 636673 1 756 475 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1297 (buf queue lock) 9599 1452414 16256 89 660 2 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_sysctl.c:1280 (Giant) 27277 2278961 183643 12 646 2494 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:3082 (vm object) 10570 2016434 957652 2 604 616 /usr/src/sys/geom/geom_io.c:67 (bio queue) 68 2840022 1825301 1 596 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_taskqueue.c:219 (taskqueue) 8107 1694351 179893 9 557 703 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1456 (vm object) 9295 895983 433202 2 532 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:1255 (so_rcv) 10185 1503986 59111 25 525 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_cluster.c:133 (vnode interlock) 8449 774938 433203 1 498 0 /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:1011 (so_rcv) 777739 1228310 104279 11 493 22 /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/pmap.c:1562 (vm page queue mutex) 53150 2562700 676529 3 448 92 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_vnops.c:799 (vnode interlock) 5427 5478084 1379072 3 5190 7504 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1397 (buf queue lock) 330 16173519 2794378 5 3428 4416 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:546 (Giant) 3322 1550577 816324 1 1842 3565 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:351 (needsbuffer lock) 1022 1140950 634114 1 251 2963 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1413 (vnode interlock) 27277 2278961 183643 12 646 2494 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:3082 (vm object) 445 561708 183643 3 14 2218 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:3101 (vm page queue mutex) 209 20679080 434199 47 0 1676 /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c:742 (inp) 109 2146035 432575 4 0 1655 /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c:1280 (so_rcv) 29 2928936 1830950 1 0 982 /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_taskqueue.c:158 (taskqueue) 153 1522915 434200 3 0 887 /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c:615 (tcp) 9881 3243923 344723 9 3513 798 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1665 (buf queue lock) 8107 1694351 179893 9 557 703 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1456 (vm object) 10570 2016434 957652 2 604 616 /usr/src/sys/geom/geom_io.c:67 (bio queue) 3002 618696 185831 3 294 600 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1905 (system map) 51 194792 58564 3 414 598 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_timeout.c:258 (Giant) 356 101934 58584 1 9 570 /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_pager.c:463 (vnode interlock) 2293 1211654 636673 1 756 475 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1297 (buf queue lock) 5259 1545316 576373 2 75 421 /usr/src/sys/sys/buf.h:272 (lockbuilder mtxpool) 141 1947944 919505 2 0 393 /usr/src/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c:2916 (bge0) 116 160008 91419 1 167 303 /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_subr.c:1404 (tcp) and "dev" 141 1947944 919505 2 0 393 /usr/src/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c:2916 (bge0) 125 382918 95532 4 0 95 /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c:327 (ATA state lock) 50 1318021 869962 1 0 77 /usr/src/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c:3245 (bge0) 756 2652763 191065 13 27 25 /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-queue.c:168 (ATA queue lock) 10088 2005842 1038913 1 18 18 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_conf.c:62 (cdev) 392 190336 95533 1 2 4 /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-queue.c:80 (ATA queue lock) 752 1886893 164765 11 91 0 /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-queue.c:185 (ATA state lock) 241 19374 111 174 19 0 /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:285 (Giant) 112 52387 915 57 46 0 /usr/src/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c:3088 (bge0) 62 4436750 434942 10 341 0 /usr/src/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c:3321 (bge0) debug.mutex.prof.reset: 0 debug.mutex.prof.stats: debug.mutex.prof.collisions: 467 debug.mutex.prof.hashsize: 1009 debug.mutex.prof.rejected: 0 debug.mutex.prof.maxrecords: 1000 debug.mutex.prof.records: 1815 debug.mutex.prof.acquisitions: 235953337 debug.mutex.prof.enable: 1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 22:45:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E0116AA1B for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:45:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C4144066 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:42:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBEMh8g9033195; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:43:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id kBEMh7Rh033192; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:43:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:43:07 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Fabian Keil In-Reply-To: <20061214132434.5ac20b82@localhost> Message-ID: <20061214234003.L32744@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <457C686E.5050504@locolomo.org> <20061214132434.5ac20b82@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How safe is encrypted disks? (data integrity) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:45:31 -0000 > >> I have been thinking to make /home on my laptop encrypted - seems like a >> good idea if it gets stolen. Now, how safe is this? Not in terms of the >> strength of the encryption algorithm, but in terms of integrity. > > I have no insight on the code, but as nobody else answered, > my response may be better than nothing. as safe as unencrypted unless you won't forget password. if just perform encryption before writing sector, and decryption after reading - so it's as safe as underlaying hardware. while i'm using gbde not geli, it's true too IMHO. > I experienced several system crashes and one or two power failures > do to empty battery but I didn't lose any data already saved > on the disk (that I know of). exactly will behave as crash on unencrypted partition. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 22:47:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02B5C16A4B3 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:47:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF1943D39 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:43:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBEMiYxd033322; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:44:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id kBEMiXUK033319; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:44:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:44:33 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Chad Gross In-Reply-To: <17489c7a0612140525i46b19403k96ac866be59ca951@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20061214234336.O32744@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <457C686E.5050504@locolomo.org> <20061214132434.5ac20b82@localhost> <17489c7a0612140525i46b19403k96ac866be59ca951@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How safe is encrypted disks? (data integrity) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:47:37 -0000 > > Another thing to consider is the performance hit when using geli with a high > encryption. I have mine set to the highest (I think) bit possible and when > transferring anything ~500MB+ it lags the system a bit to do the encryption. > not a problem at all for me (and most users i think) when encrypted partition is used only for really private data which are rarely huge files. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 23:00:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7EE416A49E for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:00:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DE8E440F2 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:50:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBEMpHr0033841; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:51:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id kBEMpHww033838; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:51:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:51:17 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Ivan Voras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20061214235046.R32744@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20061210102636.Y632@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OOPS www proxy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:00:36 -0000 >> for me it works. and works really fast, much faster than squid but after >> maybe 8-12 hours it crashes. >> >> is it buggy or i'm doing something wrong? > > I used it for several years and am still using it, but not on high > loads. It works without crashing on the default install (ports) settings. > > > on default install settings (berkeley db) it says that db doesn't support pthreads right and then runs without storages :( From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 23:01:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5042516A412 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:01:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A368744017 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:48:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBEMng4e033703; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:49:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id kBEMneS3033698; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:49:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:49:40 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Dieter In-Reply-To: <200612132215.WAA11949@sopwith.solgatos.com> Message-ID: <20061214234546.C32744@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <200612132215.WAA11949@sopwith.solgatos.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: disk I/O tuning parameters X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:01:32 -0000 > Is there a different, more detailed, description of > its effects (and/or similar tuning parameters) than found in > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/configtuning-disk.html > > Is there a way to limit the runningspace, bufspace, or similar parameters > on a per disk, per process, or per file basis rather than system wide? > I haven't been able to find anything. > > I need a way to protect the disk I/O bandwidth of one process from > other processes. Having its own disk, and running at rtprio is not IMHO no, while it could be useful. priority schedules only CPU usage. BTW - if you are processing huge files often consider editing /usr/src/sys/sys/param.h and change #define MAXPHYS (128 * 1024) /* max raw I/O transfer size */ to #define MAXPHYS (1024 * 1024) /* max raw I/O transfer size */ it won't make disk I/O scheduling better (even a bit worse) but will GREATLY speed up huge file I/O. bump hi and lorunning space at least twice the default (4 and 2MB) maybe more if you have many concurrent disks. i'm using that settings on every FreeBSD machine, no problems. when making new filesystem set -a option right when doing newfs (read man). PS. it's not answer for your question but it may help either From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 23:34:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C36F916A492 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:34:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078EE4406B for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:19:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D611A4D9D; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:52:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C6AF651375; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:52:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:52:23 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dieter Message-ID: <20061214225223.GA99321@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20061214182517.GA94080@xor.obsecurity.org> <200612142237.WAA00195@sopwith.solgatos.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200612142237.WAA00195@sopwith.solgatos.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:34:44 -0000 --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 02:37:31PM +0000, Dieter wrote: > > Sorry, yes. Nothing else contended for it though, so it doesn't > > appear to be a source of performance problems - it is probably a > > secondary effect from something else. I guess you're running some old > > version of FreeBSD since those line numbers don't correspond to > > anything reasonable in the current 6.x source, so I dunno what > > exactly. >=20 > FreeBSD 6.0 Erk. How about retrying with something modern ;-) We do fix lots of bugs over time you know! > > > > The rest looks fine at a quick glance too. > > >=3D20 > > > What should I be looking for? Do I need to collect stats for a long > > > period of time, or is a few seconds enough? Dd can kill the transfer > > > in about 3 seconds. > >=20 > > You need to make sure your sampling while the system is in the bad > > state. > >=20 > > A mutex that has a lot of acquisitions and a lot of contention for > > those acquisitions is a performance bottleneck. Nothing below falls > > into that class - in particular it's definitely not Giant causing > > performance loss to the filesystem. >=20 > Aren't the numbers (other than max and avg) going to depend a lot on how > long I collect data? Are you looking for one or two locks that have > contention a couple orders of magnitude higher than everything else? Yes, and with a large number of acquisitions. i.e. it's not usually an issue if a mutex is contended but is only acquired a few thousand times out of billions of mutex operations, but it is an issue if it's heavily used and also heavily contended. > > Still looks like it's a driver and/or hardware problem, but you'd need > > specialized knowledge to proceed with debugging it. >=20 > Maybe I didn't beat on it hard enough. Data below is with two processes > reading data from Ethernet and writing to disk. (common Ethernet, differ= ent > disks) and a loop with 3 copies of dd writing from /dev/zero to disks, > and then 3 copies of dd reading the files back and writing to /dev/null. > This ground away for a few minutes. Interrupt CPU usage might be high, but the first thing you should do is retry with 6.2-rc1 and work from there. Kris --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFgdWnWry0BWjoQKURAvDnAJ4+57TgQH1fy+TNMC8R6j6b6r8LxQCgmTDm OE0Td7wKgm2I7tyk6414uxs= =Rtjc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 23:56:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A0916A506 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:56:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E8A43DF0 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:53:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBENsnOg003916 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:54:50 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.4.96] (dzihan.cs.washington.edu [128.208.4.96]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBENsn67006209 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:54:49 -0800 Message-ID: <4581E449.1010800@u.washington.edu> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:54:49 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061108) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4581B397.8050901@dsgx.org> In-Reply-To: <4581B397.8050901@dsgx.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2006.12.14.153932 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: error trying to compile /usr/src X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:56:32 -0000 Suporte Dsgx wrote: > im trying to compile freebsd 4.10 P24 > but on the make world gives me this error > cd /usr/src/etc; install -o root -g wheel -m 444 amd.map apmd.conf > auth.conf crontab csh.cshrc csh.login csh.logout dhclient.conf > dm.conf fbtab ftpusers gettytab group hosts hosts.allow host.conf > hosts.equiv hosts.lpd inetd.conf login.access login.conf motd modems > networks newsyslog.conf pam.conf phones printcap profile protocols > rc rc.atm rc.diskless1 rc.diskless2 rc.firewall rc.firewall6 > rc.network rc.network6 rc.pccard rc.sendmail rc.serial rc.shutdown > rc.syscons rc.sysctl remote rpc services shells sysctl.conf > syslog.conf usbd.conf etc.i386/disktab etc.i386/rc.i386 > etc.i386/ttys /usr/src/etc/../gnu/usr.bin/man/manpath/manpath.config > /usr/src/etc/../usr.bin/mail/misc/mail.rc > /usr/src/etc/../usr.bin/locate/locate/locate.rc rc.isdn netstart > pccard_ether rc.suspend rc.resume nsmb.conf opieaccess > /usr/share/examples/etc > cd /usr/src/etc/defaults; install -o root -g wheel -m 444 rc.conf > make.conf pccard.conf periodic.conf /usr/share/examples/etc/defaults > make: don't know how to make copies. Stop > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/src/share. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > > -- > what can it be and how to fix it ? > thanks 3 questions: What's your make.conf file look like? What's the exact command / variables you are sending to make world? Why are you recompiling 4.10? That's pretty out of date.. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 23:58:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B9E16A4A7 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:58:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from ls405.t-com.hr (ls405.t-com.hr [195.29.150.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 154ED43D75 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:54:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from ls242.t-com.hr (ls242.t-com.hr [195.29.150.134]) by ls405.t-com.hr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85FB9143637; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:55:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from ls242.t-com.hr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ls242.t-com.hr (Qmlai) with ESMTP id 6F23B10F8055; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:55:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from ls242.t-com.hr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ls242.t-com.hr (Qmlai) with ESMTP id 58CE710F804D; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:55:39 +0100 (CET) X-Envelope-Sender-Info: qNMqIwJL6pMxrLsv6Bv6Q2KyMUHq4dg/PCrS3+GPIlRM9iIFzLoPeE8q5w/auABt X-Envelope-Sender: ivoras@fer.hr Received: from [10.0.0.102] (89-172-48-49.adsl.net.t-com.hr [89.172.48.49])by ls242.t-com.hr (Qmali) with ESMTP id 2B9B46C003F; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:55:34 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4581E47C.5060302@fer.hr> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:55:40 +0100 From: Ivan Voras User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wojciech Puchar References: <20061210102636.Y632@chylonia.3miasto.net> <20061214235046.R32744@chylonia.3miasto.net> In-Reply-To: <20061214235046.R32744@chylonia.3miasto.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-imss-version: 2.045 X-imss-result: Passed X-imss-scanInfo: M:P L:N SM:0 X-imss-tmaseResult: TT:0 TS:0.0000 TC:00 TRN:0 TV:3.6.1039(14874.003) X-imss-scores: Clean:99.90000 C:2 M:3 S:5 R:5 X-imss-settings: Baseline:1 C:1 M:1 S:1 R:1 (0.0000 0.0000) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OOPS www proxy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:58:42 -0000 Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>> for me it works. and works really fast, much faster than squid but after >>> maybe 8-12 hours it crashes. >>> >>> is it buggy or i'm doing something wrong? >> >> I used it for several years and am still using it, but not on high >> loads. It works without crashing on the default install (ports) settings. >> > on default install settings (berkeley db) it says that db doesn't > support pthreads right and then runs without storages :( ? Maybe I'm misremembering, but my storage default was gigabase and it works. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 00:29:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514A516A50D for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:29:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1D844219 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:16:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [IPv6:::1]) by gumby.homeunix.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBF0HhqL004505 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:17:44 GMT (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:17:42 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <4581A9FD.1060301@brunson.com> <20061214201130.GA96791@xor.obsecurity.org> <20061214155438.DC4C.GERARD@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20061214155438.DC4C.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612150017.42734.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> Subject: Re: Upgrade a binary package X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:29:14 -0000 On Thursday 14 December 2006 20:55, Gerard Seibert wrote: > On Thursday December 14, 2006 at 03:11:30 (PM) Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > ... > > > I only find info on "pkg_add" and "pkg_delete" for binary packages, the > > > only references to updating a package give directions on how to use the > > > ports tree. > > > > > > Is there a way to update an installed package with a newer version? > > > > sysutils/portupgrade is the usual tool. I think portmaster can do this > > too. > > portmanager lang/expect -l Portmanager cannot upgrade from binary packages - only from ports. One thing that hasn't been mentioned is that the packages for a release are not normally updated. From the handbook, 4.4.1 Installing a Package: "Note: pkg_add(1) will download the latest version of your application if you are using FreeBSD-CURRENT or FreeBSD-STABLE. If you run a -RELEASE version, it will grab the version of the package that was built with your release. It is possible to change this behavior by overriding the PACKAGESITE environment variable." See the manual for how to fetch 6-stable packages From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 00:49:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6828C16A503 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:49:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [195.115.46.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC4443F6E for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:41:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E322B616; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:42:22 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.4.4 (20061120) at rmm.fr Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (newmail.rmm.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ZEfOAHN6aW41; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:42:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (me.todoo.biz [82.66.93.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491C42B5F9; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:42:22 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <226ae0c60612141102v6eeb44b3t83e7cf6d8ea7eefa@mail.gmail.com> References: <226ae0c60612141102v6eeb44b3t83e7cf6d8ea7eefa@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <424F3BBC-28A9-4CC2-B0A1-3E5B96E644A4@todoo.biz> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: bsd Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:42:19 +0100 To: David Robillard X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: remote syslog to specific file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:49:09 -0000 Thanks David but=85 I have followed precisely your advises and It keeps on loging to /var/=20= log/messages instead of /var/log/sonic.log ?? > !fw > *.* /var/log/sonic.log Using tab instead and no spaces - restarting syslog - ?? I have also tried !firewall // no success // My logs are coming from a remote host maybe this is the reason why it =20= can't log to sonic.log ? localhost --> 192.168.2.2 remote host --> 192.168.2.1 Any help would still be apreciated ?!? Le 14 d=E9c. 06 =E0 20:02, David Robillard a =E9crit : >> Hello, >> >> >> I am trying to log my sonicwall FW log to a specific file=85 >> >> For the moment all logs are sent to /var/log/messages >> >> I would like them to go to /var/log/sonic.log >> >> >> I have tried couple of things which does not seem to work, among =20 >> them : >> >> > +fw.xxx.yyy >> > local0.* /var/log/sonic.log >> > +@ >> --> not working >> >> > local0.* /var/log/sonic.log >> --> not working either >> >> >> In /var/log/messages my log are of that format : >> >> > Dec 14 14:50:49 fw id=3Dfirewall sn=3D0006Bxxx4D6C time=3D"2006-12-14= >> > 14:50:45" fw=3D80.98.206.97 pri=3D5 c=3D64 m=3D36 msg=3D"TCP = connection >> > dropped" n=3D183 src=3D80.97.99.70:3763:WAN:89-90-99-70.pde.norby.ee >> > dst=3D192.168.2.3:135:LAN:newmail.rmm.fr proto=3Dtcp/135 >> >> >> >> Any help would be welcome. > > Try installing those two lines in your syslog.conf(5) file and make > sure you use TAB instead of spaces. > > !fw > *.* /var/log/sonic.log > > Then issue a `sudo touch /var/log/sonic.log` as the file must exist > before syslogd(8) can write to it (i.e. syslogd(8) does not create > files). > > After this run `sudo /etc/rc.d/syslogd restart` to instruct syslogd(8) > of the changes you've made to syslog.conf(5). > > Finally, make sure you edit newsyslog.conf(5) with something like this > to keep your /var file system from filling up. > > /var/log/sonic.log www:wheel 640 7 100 * J > > man newsyslog.conf for more on newsyslog.conf(5)'s syntax. > > Cheers, > > David > --=20 > David Robillard > UNIX systems administrator & Oracle DBA > CISSP, RHCE & Sun Certified Security Administrator > Montreal: +1 514 966 0122 ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?= =BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD bsd @at@ todoo.biz ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?= =BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF P "Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing =20 this e-mail" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 00:52:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DDDC16A4A7 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:52:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hugo@barafranca.com) Received: from mail.barafranca.com (mail.barafranca.com [67.19.101.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC8943E9B for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:46:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hugo@barafranca.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.barafranca.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1CEBC43B7 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:01:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.barafranca.com ([67.19.101.164]) by localhost (mail.barafranca.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 73535-02 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (a213-22-26-61.cpe.netcabo.pt [213.22.26.61]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.barafranca.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4BEC43A1 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4581F09C.1070205@barafranca.com> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:47:24 +0000 From: Hugo Silva User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061007) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at barafranca.com X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-1 required=4 tests=[none] X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: Subject: OpenBSM on 6.2-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:52:56 -0000 Hi list, I'm experimenting with OpenBSM and I'm stuck on something. I've read the manpages and the handbook section related to it, so either I'm missing something obvious, or it doesn't work properly yet. audit_control (relevant part): flags:+all,-all:no naflags:lo audit_user: username:+all,-all:no I had fm,fd on my username as a test, for chmod and trying to remove files. These don't get logged at all. The only thing I've seen thru praudit is su'ing to root (which gets logged, regardless if I input the right password or not). The expected result (at least from my basic knowledge of OpenBSM's syntax, I've been around this for a few hours only) would be logging every success and every failure from my username. I am not using console logins, this is over SSH. I'm not sure if they're related. The only way I could make OpenBSM log any more than su'ing up was to change naflags to all. According to http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/audit-config.html, "The naflags option specifies audit classes to be audited for non-attributed events, such as the login process and system daemons." So the only thing that could be happening based on my limited knowledge of this software, is that somehow it cannot distinguish usernames on SSH connections. This seems odd, to say the least, so I'm resorting to the list, in the hopes that someone can point me in the right direction. Hugo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 01:11:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5393916A415 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:11:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from ext-gw.lemis.com (ext-gw.lemis.com [150.101.14.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0FAC43E2E for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:07:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by ext-gw.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B1013354E; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:39:28 +1030 (CST) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 528B59BF11; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:39:28 +1030 (CST) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:39:28 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Renegade Penguin Message-ID: <20061215010928.GE34082@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <162fb23f0612140431g44dc095bt3a858e75009fddaf@mail.gmail.com> <458154B3.60008@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QmMh2VKaunwcDwPx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <458154B3.60008@comcast.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 VoIP: sip:0871270137@sip.internode.on.net WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Black Lines on my monitor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:11:02 -0000 --QmMh2VKaunwcDwPx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline [Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html] Sequence recovered, long/short syndrome. On Thursday, 14 December 2006 at 5:42:11 -0800, Renegade Penguin wrote: > P Tyrrell wrote: >> Hello - Help >> >> About two weeks ago I noticed that there was a shadow appearing on >> the monitor alond any black type or dark picture - thinking it >> wasthe monitor I swaped it with another and there are still black >> lines appearing along the lines of text. >> >> What can I do to get rid of this? >> Please bear in mind youre talking to a layman not a professional techie. >> thankyou. > > If it's the video card, it very likely could be a speck of dust across > some of the traces on any number of chips on the card. Taking out the > video card, blowing it off, and re-seating it may help. A thorough > cleaning out of the case could help as well. And if that doesn't work, then put it in the dishwasher on the hottest cycle. If the card doesn't work after that, replace it. Seriously, I can only assume that your statement was meant as a joke. Getting back to the original question, the description could be clearer. Are these horizontal or vertical? How wide? For what I know, there are several possibilities. It could really be the card no longer being able to drive the display adequately, or it could be the connection between the card and the monitor. This kind of problem often occurs when monitors are connected via KVAs. But to really understand the situation, you (P) need to describe the appearance of the shadows more clearly. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --QmMh2VKaunwcDwPx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFgfXIIubykFB6QiMRAuj4AJwKBmRpH7P4BCFSM+/+Yf4CSThDgACghsqb qYEJaW44IP/Tnw7BYrfXVp0= =H7wi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QmMh2VKaunwcDwPx-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 01:23:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B8216A47C for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:23:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from calais.chapman.edu (calais.chapman.edu [192.77.116.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F7A43CF2 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:17:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix, from userid 125) id 5E7ED2E58C; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:54:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix, from userid 125) id BDE412E5BB; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:36:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix, from userid 125) id 3FBA52E5D1; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:26:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix, from userid 125) id 0FDAC2E596; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:25:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix, from userid 125) id 5A9902E3D1; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:24:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix, from userid 125) id 8E01D2E526; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:44:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix, from userid 125) id 7933E2E50E; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:23:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from [206.211.142.181] (ist181.chapman.edu [206.211.142.181]) by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F11E2E35F for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:23:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4581CEFC.2010801@chapman.edu> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:23:56 -0800 From: Jay Chandler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20061214101951.269c6303.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20061214101951.269c6303.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Chapman-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean, Found to be clean, Found to be clean, Found to be clean, Found to be clean, Found to be clean, Found to be clean X-Spam-Status: No, No, No, No, No, No, No, No X-Chapman-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Chapman-MailScanner-From: chandler@chapman.edu Subject: Re: Dell 2950 & 1950 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:23:12 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: > In response to "Peter Grigor" : > > >> I've just gotten some quotes on a few dell machines and I was wondering now >> if freebsd 6.x is able to run on them properly. Perc/5i cards and 64-bit >> Intel chips are my worries :) >> >> Anyone have any experiences they'd like to share? Anyone successfully >> running mysql on an IA64 architecture with Freebsd? >> > > We're in the early stages of deployment with these. None of them are > actually in production yet, but we're in the final stages of putting > them there. > > 6.1 doesn't work with the onboard NICS -- you have to get a 6.2-RC > or wait for 6.2. Otherwise, everything 64-bit works as far as we > can tell. We're a little grumpy that we don't have any way to > monitor the RAID (our Dell x850 systems use megarc to automatically > signal us if a drive fails) We've also had occasional problems > with the reboot and shutdown commands not completing, but it's been > so intermittent that we can't seem to isolate the cause. Symptom > is that it gets to the final stage of reboot/shutdown and then waits > indefinitely without issuing the final ACPI command. > > Do some searches on my name and/or those topics on the stable@ > list archives for more details. > > Running the same 1950 platform here with the i386 base-- I've seen the same problems you mention. The onboard NIC worked intermittently, but kept crashing, so was replaced with an Intel NIC. I just placed an order for 7 more, and made sure to get the Intel onboard NIC option. Restarting is buggy as well, with the same symptoms. My (inelegant) solution is to install a pair of ethernet managed power strips, so I can kill power remotely to bring it all the way down if need be. What advantages/disadvantages do you see with running the 64 bit architecture? I must confess, it never occured to me to try that... I'm running the Dual Core Xeon processors, if that helps anything. -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / chandler@chapman.edu Today's Excuse: astropneumatic oscillations in the water-cooling From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 01:38:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 565F416A416 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:38:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9074409E for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:26:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from working (c-71-60-174-60.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.60.174.60]) (AUTH: LOGIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:28:01 -0500 id 00056407.4581FA21.00007323 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:28:00 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: Jay Chandler Message-Id: <20061214202800.c6b60843.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <4581CEFC.2010801@chapman.edu> References: <20061214101951.269c6303.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <4581CEFC.2010801@chapman.edu> Organization: Collaborative Fusion Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.10 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dell 2950 & 1950 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:38:46 -0000 Jay Chandler wrote: > > Bill Moran wrote: > > In response to "Peter Grigor" : > > > >> I've just gotten some quotes on a few dell machines and I was wondering now > >> if freebsd 6.x is able to run on them properly. Perc/5i cards and 64-bit > >> Intel chips are my worries :) > >> > >> Anyone have any experiences they'd like to share? Anyone successfully > >> running mysql on an IA64 architecture with Freebsd? > >> > > > > We're in the early stages of deployment with these. None of them are > > actually in production yet, but we're in the final stages of putting > > them there. > > > > 6.1 doesn't work with the onboard NICS -- you have to get a 6.2-RC > > or wait for 6.2. Otherwise, everything 64-bit works as far as we > > can tell. We're a little grumpy that we don't have any way to > > monitor the RAID (our Dell x850 systems use megarc to automatically > > signal us if a drive fails) We've also had occasional problems > > with the reboot and shutdown commands not completing, but it's been > > so intermittent that we can't seem to isolate the cause. Symptom > > is that it gets to the final stage of reboot/shutdown and then waits > > indefinitely without issuing the final ACPI command. > > > > Do some searches on my name and/or those topics on the stable@ > > list archives for more details. > > > Running the same 1950 platform here with the i386 base-- I've seen the > same problems you mention. The onboard NIC worked intermittently, but > kept crashing, so was replaced with an Intel NIC. I just placed an > order for 7 more, and made sure to get the Intel onboard NIC option. > Restarting is buggy as well, with the same symptoms. My (inelegant) > solution is to install a pair of ethernet managed power strips, so I can > kill power remotely to bring it all the way down if need be. We get all our units with Dell's remote access card installed. It gives us the same kind of remote admin -- equivalent to being able to hit the power button from the other side of the planet. > What advantages/disadvantages do you see with running the 64 bit > architecture? I must confess, it never occured to me to try that... > I'm running the Dual Core Xeon processors, if that helps anything. In our case, we're primarily concerned about RAM. These units are starting out with 4G, and we're monitoring them so we can add RAM when the usage goes up. amd64 is obviously going to be better supported going forward than PAE. -Bill From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 01:46:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218AF16A407 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:46:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from calais.chapman.edu (calais.chapman.edu [192.77.116.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448DC44111 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:39:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from [206.211.142.181] (ist181.chapman.edu [206.211.142.181]) by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3CC2E5BF; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:40:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4581FD29.6040807@chapman.edu> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:40:57 -0800 From: Jay Chandler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Moran References: <20061214101951.269c6303.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <4581CEFC.2010801@chapman.edu> <20061214202800.c6b60843.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20061214202800.c6b60843.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Chapman-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Chapman-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Chapman-MailScanner-From: chandler@chapman.edu X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dell 2950 & 1950 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:46:04 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: > We get all our units with Dell's remote access card installed. It > gives us the same kind of remote admin -- equivalent to being able to > hit the power button from the other side of the planet. > Some of our servers have it, some of them don't-- I've been here four months, and wasn't involved in prior purchases. If I had my druthers, we'd be on HP servers instead (I'd also probably be able to get a good price on Ebay for "druthers," but I digress), or IBM, or one of several other more expensive options, but for now I'm playing the hand I was dealt, serverwise. On the plus side, they're all starting out with a comfortable 4 gigs of RAM. >> What advantages/disadvantages do you see with running the 64 bit >> architecture? I must confess, it never occured to me to try that... >> I'm running the Dual Core Xeon processors, if that helps anything. >> > > In our case, we're primarily concerned about RAM. These units are starting > out with 4G, and we're monitoring them so we can add RAM when the usage > goes up. amd64 is obviously going to be better supported going forward > than PAE. > Right, PAE is sort of a blast from the past, and I'd much sooner go to a new server than screw around with the 4gb limit personally. Is there any more work to maintaining an amd64 install than "grab a different ISO when it's time to install the box?" Also, will it work on the Xeon dual core? I've always been comfortably removed from the hardware level, and my new responsibilities aren't quite familiar to me yet... -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / chandler@chapman.edu Today's Excuse: Processes running slowly due to weak power supply From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 01:57:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11B816A505 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:57:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from donald.teed@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87C043E1D for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:54:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from donald.teed@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so621578uge for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:56:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=bi8xfKq4rCEd9xdAvpwNFkGGowW3x/U0XkU9OnfGeqstE3YFw8BQTNde77afIUH8u+RPmSHqinXwWzKe0JVIJ1tWio3RswtuZbIl026pMMNBsFRUsxBxaqO9KU41aSoKVDvYM8MOWZlpkOsD4pnohVcsPkCBZjn3OJJkjPMZazI= Received: by 10.78.39.16 with SMTP id m16mr76269hum.1166147797011; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:56:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.159.6 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:56:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:56:36 -0400 From: "D G Teed" To: "Phillip Upchurch" In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20061214162215.04e75068@houston.oilfield.slb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7.0.1.0.2.20061214162215.04e75068@houston.oilfield.slb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Legato Client for freeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:57:56 -0000 The legato client in ports has been dropped for lack of maintenance and security issue of the default config. You can get a 6.0 compatible client by back dating ports. Current 7.x versions of the legato server will not work with this old FreeBSD client version, so it may be a dead end. We are implementing a Linux box with JOBD to rsync-diff our BSD boxes to, and then the Linux box will be backed up by networker. --Donald On 12/14/06, Phillip Upchurch wrote: > > > > I am running Legato on a sun server. > > I have a server running freeBSD that needs the legato backup client > installed. > > Is there a working legato client for freeBSD ?? > > > Thanks > Phil Upchurch > 713 513 1143 > Schlumberger > Houston EMC > Server Ops Team > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 02:04:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC9716A417 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 02:04:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.hill@yournetplus.com) Received: from admin.mwci.net (cgate.yournetplus.com [162.42.148.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D3D43CB2 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 02:02:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from d.hill@yournetplus.com) Received: from [12.219.108.146] (account d.hill@yournetplus.com) by admin.mwci.net (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.8) with HTTP id 78917414; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 02:03:37 +0000 From: To: Jay Chandler X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.8 Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 02:03:37 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4581FD29.6040807@chapman.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dell 2950 & 1950 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 02:04:12 -0000 On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:40:57 -0800 Jay Chandler wrote: >Bill Moran wrote: >> We get all our units with Dell's remote access card >>installed. It >> gives us the same kind of remote admin -- equivalent to >>being able to >> hit the power button from the other side of the planet. >> >Some of our servers have it, some of them don't-- I've >been here four months, and wasn't involved in prior >purchases. If I had my druthers, we'd be on HP servers >instead (I'd also probably be able to get a good price on >Ebay for "druthers," but I digress), or IBM, or one of >several other more expensive options, but for now I'm >playing the hand I was dealt, serverwise. On the plus >side, they're all starting out with a comfortable 4 gigs >of RAM. > >>> What advantages/disadvantages do you see with running >>>the 64 bit >>> architecture? I must confess, it never occured to me to >>>try that... >>> I'm running the Dual Core Xeon processors, if that helps >>>anything. >>> >> >> In our case, we're primarily concerned about RAM. These >>units are starting >> out with 4G, and we're monitoring them so we can add RAM >>when the usage >> goes up. amd64 is obviously going to be better >>supported going forward >> than PAE. >> >Right, PAE is sort of a blast from the past, and I'd much >sooner go to a new server than screw around with the 4gb >limit personally. Is there any more work to maintaining >an amd64 install than "grab a different ISO when it's >time to install the box?" > >Also, will it work on the Xeon dual core? I've always >been comfortably removed from the hardware level, and my >new responsibilities aren't quite familiar to me yet... We just recently purchased a PowerEdge 6850 configured with 4x3.0ghz dual core zeon processors. The AMD64 ISO install was used. Once the basic install was complete, I recompiled the kernel with SMP. They are all showing up and operational. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 02:39:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0580D16A403 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 02:39:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ansarm@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A3943CEC for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 02:36:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ansarm@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i28so354337wra for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:38:05 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:x-mimeole:thread-index; b=c2NMfluuDJw5VTNRRM5WEj2NAzJ0uvoOJmBetfmlQfkGhUIQaUifJeO0Hfq61NdsUd8P3GaY6sO9V3+ZwMNGU4ZyIVNfWq3KCUxK3PKACzN7D+o2IKmNJSSXo2zd7qRoP2mVzWBQUU2K4t0PqoT7I11V4lOMLIkgsV2d2KQ9J/Y= Received: by 10.90.50.1 with SMTP id x1mr173185agx.1166150285713; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:38:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from ansarmm2 ( [69.156.29.187]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1sm2143033agb.2006.12.14.18.38.03; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:38:05 -0800 (PST) From: "Ansar Mohammed" To: Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:37:53 -0500 Message-ID: <000e01c71ff2$07e89c20$ea02a8c0@northamerica.corp.microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Thread-Index: Accf8gUot/FdMfSDR82DIopUYWKdEg== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: FreeBSD ports tree on OpenBSD/NetBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 02:39:12 -0000 Does the FreeBSd ports tree work on NetBSD or OpenBSD? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 02:54:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 861CF16A4A0 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 02:54:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zwade@oldpathsbaptistchurch.org) Received: from trinity.vnet-inc.com (matrix.vnet-inc.com [216.129.224.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A60A743CB4 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 02:52:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zwade@oldpathsbaptistchurch.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.vnet-inc.com [127.0.0.1]) by trinity.vnet-inc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A077C5A43988 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:54:07 -0700 (MST) Received: from trinity.vnet-inc.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (matrix.vnet-inc.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 40853-09 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:54:07 -0700 (MST) Received: from [192.168.129.225] (unknown [65.19.244.43]) by trinity.vnet-inc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4082F5A40739 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:54:07 -0700 (MST) From: "Z. Wade Hampton" Organization: OPBC To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:18:11 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612142018.11695.zwade@oldpathsbaptistchurch.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at vnet-inc.com Subject: cvsup and amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 02:54:23 -0000 Greetings to all, I'm running a dell 1501 laptop with amd64x2 processor. I got a disk from a guru specifically for this architecture, booted it, and installed 6.1 via FTP. Yesterday I ran cvsup successfully. Today I did "make buildworld" successfully. Now, I have a little paranoia about "buildkernel". Please tell me, did I need to specify anything specifically about the amd64 architecture when running cvsup? Did I possibly get a GENERIC kernel file through cvsup that is not compatible with amd? Anxious in Montana, Z. Wade Hampton Twin Bridges, MT From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 03:01:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBFA116A412 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 03:01:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from calais.chapman.edu (calais.chapman.edu [192.77.116.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C4F43CAE for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 02:58:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from [206.211.142.181] (ist181.chapman.edu [206.211.142.181]) by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15FD2E4B9; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:00:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45820FAF.90602@chapman.edu> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:59:59 -0800 From: Jay Chandler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Z. Wade Hampton" References: <200612142018.11695.zwade@oldpathsbaptistchurch.org> In-Reply-To: <200612142018.11695.zwade@oldpathsbaptistchurch.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Chapman-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Chapman-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Chapman-MailScanner-From: chandler@chapman.edu X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup and amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 03:01:35 -0000 Z. Wade Hampton wrote: > Greetings to all, > I'm running a dell 1501 laptop with amd64x2 processor. > I got a disk from a guru specifically for this architecture, booted it, and > installed 6.1 via FTP. > > Yesterday I ran cvsup successfully. > Today I did "make buildworld" successfully. > > Now, I have a little paranoia about "buildkernel". > > Please tell me, did I need to specify anything specifically about the amd64 > architecture when running cvsup? Did I possibly get a GENERIC kernel file > through cvsup that is not compatible with amd? > > Anxious in Montana, > Z. Wade Hampton > Twin Bridges, MT > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I'm told that KERNCONF=SMP is the command to pass-- you're also going to want to throw in a -j4 or so. So the command will be: make -j4 buildkernel KERNCONF=SMP; make -j4 installkernel KERNCONF=SMP -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / chandler@chapman.edu Today's Excuse: Processes running slowly due to weak power supply From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 03:24:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1043A16A536 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 03:24:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (pool-71-245-104-192.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [71.245.104.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BDC643DA1 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 03:22:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (localhost.home.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBF3NLXY021638 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:23:21 -0800 Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id kBF3NLam021635 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:23:21 -0800 Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id AAA06605; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:26:18 GMT Message-Id: <200612150026.AAA06605@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:52:23 EST." <20061214225223.GA99321@xor.obsecurity.org> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:26:18 +0000 From: Dieter Subject: Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 03:24:09 -0000 > > FreeBSD 6.0 > > Erk. How about retrying with something modern ;-) We do fix lots of > bugs over time you know! In my defense, 6.0 is only one revision down. (until 6.2 comes out real soon now) >> 32.3%Sys 31.5%Intr 0.0%User 0.0%Nice 36.2%Idl 710892 inact 32 3: sio1 >> 74.8%Sys 25.2%Intr 0.0%User 0.0%Nice 0.0%Idl 828676 inact 36 3: sio1 > Interrupt CPU usage might be high, but the first thing you should do > is retry with 6.2-rc1 and work from there. Whoops, the systat -vmstat and vmstat -i were with mutex profiling enabled. Sorry about that. CPU usage is much lower with it off. 85-95% idle when writing. writing: 5 users Load 0.33 0.33 0.22 Dec 14 16:06 Mem:KB REAL VIRTUAL VN PAGER SWAP PAGER Tot Share Tot Share Free in out in out Act 868784 3600 893464 7828 62208 count All 2003956 3904 1623566k 8284 pages zfod Interrupts Proc:r p d s w Csw Trp Sys Int Sof Flt cow 2179 total 5 43 4265 1 856 4861 2 677056 wire 1002 0: clk 449856 act 1: atkb 2.3%Sys 2.3%Intr 0.0%User 0.0%Nice 95.3%Idl 822692 inact 31 3: sio1 | | | | | | | | | | 59244 cache 4: sio0 =+ 2964 free 7: ppc0 daefr stray 7 Namei Name-cache Dir-cache prcfr 128 8: rtc Calls hits % hits % 2 react 44 10: ohc pdwak 922 11: fwo pdpgs 14: ata Disks ad2 ad4 ad6 ad8 ad10 da0 cd0 intrn 52 15: ata KB/t 119 0.00 128 128 128 128 0.00 218640 buf tps 27 0 22 26 3 3 0 25 dirtybuf MB/s 3.13 0.00 2.74 3.24 0.37 0.37 0.00 100000 desiredvnodes % busy 47 0 41 48 5 3 0 985 numvnodes 582 freevnodes reading: 5 users Load 0.47 0.35 0.23 Dec 14 16:07 Mem:KB REAL VIRTUAL VN PAGER SWAP PAGER Tot Share Tot Share Free in out in out Act 868776 3592 893464 7828 109448 count All 2004988 3896 1623995k 8284 pages zfod Interrupts Proc:r p d s w Csw Trp Sys Int Sof Flt cow 6984 total 3 45 24496 5 221416918 78 677084 wire 1003 0: clk 449984 act 1: atkb 45.3%Sys 10.9%Intr 0.0%User 0.0%Nice 43.8%Idl 776328 inact 32 3: sio1 | | | | | | | | | | 106484 cache 4: sio0 =======================+++++ 2964 free 7: ppc0 daefr stray 7 Namei Name-cache Dir-cache prcfr 128 8: rtc Calls hits % hits % 322 react 825 10: ohc 3 pdwak 4365 11: fwo 39334 pdpgs 14: ata Disks ad2 ad4 ad6 ad8 ad10 da0 cd0 intrn 631 15: ata KB/t 125 0.00 128 115 128 128 0.00 218592 buf tps 321 0 412 521 9 9 0 15 dirtybuf MB/s 39.30 0.00 51.45 58.62 1.12 1.12 0.00 100000 desiredvnodes % busy 100 0 100 82 15 10 0 985 numvnodes 582 freevnodes interrupt total rate irq0: clk 15227816 1000 irq1: atkbd0 2 0 irq3: sio1 361128 23 irq4: sio0 702 0 irq7: ppc0 83 0 stray irq7 1 0 irq8: rtc 1948792 127 irq10: ohci0 ohci1+ 287380 18 irq11: fwohci0 bge* 8675757 569 irq14: ata0 57 0 irq15: ata1 238863 15 Total 26740581 1756 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 04:07:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F6E016A403 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 04:07:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from groundedforlife@verizon.net) Received: from smtp102.vzn.mail.dcn.yahoo.com (smtp102.vzn.mail.dcn.yahoo.com [209.73.179.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15BB043CA0 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 04:05:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from groundedforlife@verizon.net) Received: (qmail 9810 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2006 04:07:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.47?) (argentina97@verizon.net@71.116.100.83 with plain) by smtp102.vzn.mail.dcn.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Dec 2006 04:07:09 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: ftPXkSgVM1lTbrzhHAF1xrEeXFTfzOXOkjXVTkmd4HJoMnqBeyLJncyrSS2IRautgHVnMhjTKtAhl6N1kXwsrrysMp6ZVBBtl2mYIb5hl_MKIIHseZSswgxaceuYKTZj From: Eric Buchanan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:07:03 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <000e01c71ff2$07e89c20$ea02a8c0@northamerica.corp.microsoft.com> In-Reply-To: <000e01c71ff2$07e89c20$ea02a8c0@northamerica.corp.microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612142007.04033.groundedforlife@verizon.net> Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports tree on OpenBSD/NetBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 04:07:10 -0000 On Thursday 14 December 2006 18:37, Ansar Mohammed wrote: > Does the FreeBSd ports tree work on NetBSD or OpenBSD? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" FreeBSD's ports tree only works on FreeBSD. NetBSD and OpenBSD have their own ports trees derived from FreeBSD. NetBSD's port tree (pkgsrc) will work on quite a few other operating sytems, including FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 05:00:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28DE16A49E for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 05:00:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arminius@pubbox.net) Received: from pubbox.net (pubbox.net [81.169.167.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3410043CF2 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 04:57:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arminius@pubbox.net) Received: from e180101045.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.180.101.45] helo=pubbox.net) by pubbox.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Gv59z-000OFD-HX for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 05:59:03 +0100 Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 05:59:20 +0100 From: Armin Arh To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061215045920.GA708@pubbox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: arminius@pubbox.net Subject: Palm Tx + jpilot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 05:00:30 -0000 Running a 6.2PRERELEASE kernel here. Just purchased a brand new Palm TX Handheld and connected it via usb to my PC. Surprisingly jpilot did not work, did so for my elder Zire71 (which is broken...) running 5.4-RELEASE. After clearing the confusion about ucom0 was renamed to cuaU0 (why?) it worked, theoretically... Every time i press the hotsync button devfs creates the device newly, but with wrong privileges. In /etc/devfs.conf: perm cuaU0 0666 but then: ## l /dev/cuaU0 crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer - 0, 113 Dec 15 05:00 /dev/cuaU0 The /dev/devfs.conf permissions only apply when i run "/etc/rc.d/devfs restart" This is a nogo because i have only 1 second between pressing sync on the Handheld and clicking sync on jpilot. TIA Armin -- PUBBOX Postmaster + spam-killer. Free email addresses at http://pubbox.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 05:53:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE5416A47B for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 05:53:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from stargate.alaskaparadise.com (114-103-74-65.gci.net [65.74.103.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E5C43CB2 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 05:52:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@alaskaparadise.com) Received: by stargate.alaskaparadise.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 3A8C045FC; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:53:45 -0900 (AKST) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: Alaska Paradise Travel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:53:23 -0900 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart29934464.8xynWNEtZU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200612142053.43768.freebsd@alaskaparadise.com> Subject: proftpd syntax error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 05:53:48 -0000 --nextPart29934464.8xynWNEtZU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I'm in the process of updating this port. I'm getting this on a test build: support.c: In function `sreplace': support.c:862: error: syntax error at end of input gmake[1]: *** [support.o] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory=20 `/usr/ports/ftp/proftpd.test/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/src' gmake: *** [src] Error 2 *** Error code 2 And here's the code in question: const char *pr_strtime(time_t t) { static char buf[30]; static char *mons[] =3D { "Jan", "Feb", "Mar", "Apr", "May", "Jun", "Jul", "Aug", "Sep", "Oct", "Nov", "Dec" }; static char *days[] =3D { "Sun", "Mon", "Tue", "Wed", "Thu", "Fri", "Sat"= }; struct tm *tr; memset(buf, '\0', sizeof(buf)); tr =3D localtime(&t); if (tr !=3D NULL) { snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s %s %2d %02d:%02d:%02d %d", days[tr->tm_wday], mons[tr->tm_mon], tr->tm_mday, tr->tm_hour, tr->tm_min, tr->tm_sec, tr->tm_year + 1900); } else buf[0] =3D '\0'; buf[sizeof(buf)-1] =3D '\0'; return buf; } Can someone tell me what's wrong? Beech =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart29934464.8xynWNEtZU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFgjhnR5sEeCt9j00RApxKAJ9/e60xGm9ND9etiNHYQEs1WukLbgCfYOYc +Z9w4ZhKQ0Gdlth0XDX9Ci8= =GY6J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart29934464.8xynWNEtZU-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 06:01:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D6016A4D1 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 06:01:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5398A43CC0 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 05:59:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C461A4D93; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:01:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F0349515CA; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:01:20 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:01:20 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dieter Message-ID: <20061215060120.GA58596@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20061214225223.GA99321@xor.obsecurity.org> <200612150026.AAA06605@sopwith.solgatos.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200612150026.AAA06605@sopwith.solgatos.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 06:01:29 -0000 --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 04:26:18PM +0000, Dieter wrote: > > > FreeBSD 6.0 > >=20 > > Erk. How about retrying with something modern ;-) We do fix lots of > > bugs over time you know! >=20 > In my defense, 6.0 is only one revision down. (until 6.2 comes out real = soon now) Or to put it another way, your system is missing 13 1/2 months of continuous bug fixes :-D > >> 32.3%Sys 31.5%Intr 0.0%User 0.0%Nice 36.2%Idl 710892 inact 32 = 3: sio1 >=20 > >> 74.8%Sys 25.2%Intr 0.0%User 0.0%Nice 0.0%Idl 828676 inact 36 = 3: sio1 >=20 > > Interrupt CPU usage might be high, but the first thing you should do > > is retry with 6.2-rc1 and work from there. >=20 > Whoops, the systat -vmstat and vmstat -i were with mutex profiling enable= d. > Sorry about that. CPU usage is much lower with it off. 85-95% idle when= writing. OK, that's better. Still, the only thing that fits is some kind of driver or hardware problem, so check 6.2-rc1 and see if it's still there. Kris --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFgjowWry0BWjoQKURAmPfAKDxX7RMV2rQ7qJKnKiKy1DP9XMWiQCghVWc /6o2WZqIr4iOsgJovKh8Z7U= =7iF6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 06:02:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0E516A407 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 06:02:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BCAE43CA5 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 06:01:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935381A4D93; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:02:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B994051349; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:02:51 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:02:51 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Z. Wade Hampton" Message-ID: <20061215060251.GB58596@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200612142018.11695.zwade@oldpathsbaptistchurch.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tsOsTdHNUZQcU9Ye" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200612142018.11695.zwade@oldpathsbaptistchurch.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup and amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 06:02:53 -0000 --tsOsTdHNUZQcU9Ye Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 08:18:11PM -0700, Z. Wade Hampton wrote: > Greetings to all, > I'm running a dell 1501 laptop with amd64x2 processor. > I got a disk from a guru specifically for this architecture, booted it, a= nd=20 > installed 6.1 via FTP. >=20 > Yesterday I ran cvsup successfully. > Today I did "make buildworld" successfully. >=20 > Now, I have a little paranoia about "buildkernel". >=20 > Please tell me, did I need to specify anything specifically about the amd= 64=20 > architecture when running cvsup? Did I possibly get a GENERIC kernel fil= e=20 > through cvsup that is not compatible with amd? No, unless you tried hard to avoid it, the source tree you downloaded includes the amd64 code, and you'll be building an amd64 kernel from it. Kris --tsOsTdHNUZQcU9Ye Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFgjqLWry0BWjoQKURAqbVAJ48ZV0+KD0NeEy9Pke5Q8MpEBA+iwCfRD27 9KbNc4imrBzy+RVtbYi4ggY= =iYm/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tsOsTdHNUZQcU9Ye-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 06:15:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5C616A40F for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 06:15:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amistry@am-productions.biz) Received: from mail.united-ware.com (am-productions.biz [69.61.164.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3F843CA3 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 06:13:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from amistry@am-productions.biz) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (cpe-24-210-75-119.columbus.res.rr.com [24.210.75.119]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.united-ware.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBF6aYTj020476 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:36:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from amistry@am-productions.biz) From: Anish Mistry Organization: AM Productions To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:16:46 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061215045920.GA708@pubbox.net> In-Reply-To: <20061215045920.GA708@pubbox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6504634.nCa1sRcDYf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200612150117.01446.amistry@am-productions.biz> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,J_CHICKENPOX_55, MYFREEBSD2,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on mail.united-ware.com X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.5/2334/Thu Dec 14 14:46:52 2006 on mail.united-ware.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Armin Arh Subject: Re: Palm Tx + jpilot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 06:15:40 -0000 --nextPart6504634.nCa1sRcDYf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 14 December 2006 23:59, Armin Arh wrote: > Running a 6.2PRERELEASE kernel here. > > Just purchased a brand new Palm TX Handheld and connected > it via usb to my PC. Surprisingly jpilot did not work, did > so for my elder Zire71 (which is broken...) running 5.4-RELEASE. > > After clearing the confusion about ucom0 was renamed > to cuaU0 (why?) it worked, theoretically... > > Every time i press the hotsync button devfs creates > the device newly, but with wrong privileges. > > In /etc/devfs.conf: > perm cuaU0 0666 > > but then: > ## l /dev/cuaU0 > crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer - 0, 113 Dec 15 05:00 /dev/cuaU0 > > The /dev/devfs.conf permissions only apply when i run > "/etc/rc.d/devfs restart" This is a nogo because i have only 1 > second between pressing sync on the Handheld and clicking sync on > jpilot. man devfs.rules =2D-=20 Anish Mistry amistry@am-productions.biz AM Productions http://am-productions.biz/ --nextPart6504634.nCa1sRcDYf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFgj3dxqA5ziudZT0RAlfWAKCuyeHaoXMlg0jB0KkoiHYzJ2uPcQCeLts9 DWi8TTzOM/SS02WwMF2K004= =XcP0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6504634.nCa1sRcDYf-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 06:23:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FFE316A40F for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 06:23:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arminius@pubbox.net) Received: from pubbox.net (pubbox.net [81.169.167.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1F943CBD for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 06:21:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arminius@pubbox.net) Received: from e180101045.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.180.101.45] helo=pubbox.net) by pubbox.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Gv6TN-00072j-Pp; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:23:09 +0100 Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:23:27 +0100 From: Armin Arh To: Anish Mistry Message-ID: <20061215062326.GD708@pubbox.net> References: <20061215045920.GA708@pubbox.net> <200612150117.01446.amistry@am-productions.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200612150117.01446.amistry@am-productions.biz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: arminius@pubbox.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Palm Tx + jpilot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 06:23:11 -0000 On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 01:16:46AM -0500, Anish Mistry wrote: > > In /etc/devfs.conf: > > perm cuaU0 0666 > > > > but then: > > ## l /dev/cuaU0 > > crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer - 0, 113 Dec 15 05:00 /dev/cuaU0 > > > > The /dev/devfs.conf permissions only apply when i run > > "/etc/rc.d/devfs restart" This is a nogo because i have only 1 > > second between pressing sync on the Handheld and clicking sync on > > jpilot. > man devfs.rules Thx. Now devfs.rules(5) redirects me to devfs.conf(5) which clearly states i should set perm cuaU0 0666 and i did so as described in my initial post. Nevertheless the permissions became wrong. Maybe it works after the next reboot, which is hard to believe... we'll see. -- PUBBOX Postmaster + spam-killer. Free email addresses at http://pubbox.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 07:11:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C9316A415 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:11:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B891A43CA3 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:10:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from stat.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Gv7E7-0006as-QD; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:11:27 +0300 Received: from bsam by ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Gv7FE-0004QK-A7; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:12:36 +0300 To: Kris Kennaway References: <4581A9FD.1060301@brunson.com> <20061214201130.GA96791@xor.obsecurity.org> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:12:36 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20061214201130.GA96791@xor.obsecurity.org> (Kris Kennaway's message of "Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:11:30 -0500") Message-ID: <14852075@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Eric Brunson Subject: Re: Upgrade a binary package X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:11:41 -0000 On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:11:30 -0500 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 12:46:05PM -0700, Eric Brunson wrote: > > I've been searching the manual and the man pages, but I can't seem to > > find a command to update an installed package to a newer version. I > > always get a message like this: > > > > pkg_add: package 'expect-5.43.0_1' or its older version already installed > > > > I only find info on "pkg_add" and "pkg_delete" for binary packages, the > > only references to updating a package give directions on how to use the > > ports tree. > > > > Is there a way to update an installed package with a newer version? > sysutils/portupgrade is the usual tool. I think portmaster can do this too. "portupgrdae -P" will try to use a package and then fall back to building a port and "portupgrade -PP" will try to use only packages while portmaster is not capable (so far?) to use packages. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 07:23:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8103E16A415 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:23:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8326E43CB1 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:21:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.141]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBF7N90P014735 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:23:10 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBF7N9bO005455 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:23:09 -0800 Message-ID: <45824D5C.30600@u.washington.edu> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:23:08 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2006.12.14.230434 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='IP_HTTP_ADDR 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: ipf and dealing with inbound RPC services X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:23:11 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello once again, Just setup ipf on my freebsd server, and I'm having some issues with RPC services and my firewall rules. I run nfsd and smbd, exporting my directories to a number of clients, and everything works without the firewall running, but stuff doesn't work with it running in smbd. Here are my effective rules for the server so far: [root@hoover /home/gcooper]# ipfstat -i pass in quick on lo0 all block in quick from any to any with frag block in quick from 172.16.0.0/12 to any block in quick from 10.0.0.0/8 to any block in quick from 127.0.0.0/8 to any block in quick from 0.0.0.0/8 to any block in quick from 169.254.0.0/16 to any block in quick from 192.0.2.0/24 to any block in quick from 204.152.64.0/23 to any block in quick from 224.0.0.0/3 to any pass in quick proto tcp from any to 192.168.0.100/32 port = ssh flags S/FSRPAU keep state pass in quick proto tcp/udp from any to any port = sunrpc keep state pass in quick proto tcp/udp from any to any port 830 >< 884 keep state pass in quick proto tcp/udp from any to any port 137 >< 139 keep state pass in quick proto tcp/udp from any to any port = microsoft-ds keep state pass in quick proto tcp/udp from any to any port = nfsd keep state pass in quick proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 3632 keep state pass in quick proto icmp from any to 192.168.0.100/32 keep state [root@hoover /home/gcooper]# ipfstat -o pass out quick on lo0 all pass out quick all keep state nfsd works, but only after experimenting with the open ports a bit. Figured out that rpcbind semi-randomly selects ports for mountd and I have to write a script to auto-add rules for the ports it creates for mountd. As for smbd, I can't seem to get incoming packets past the ipf firewall. Would anyone have any ideas for why things aren't working for smbd and have solutions for how you got your ipf firewall to work with smbd? All the solutions I can find after some searching have to deal with Solaris or ancient versions of Freebsd (2.1... eep). TIA, - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFgk1bEnKyINQw/HARAr3yAJ9L4lZcsj16a3m+ls+1S6MxfrVAvgCdFyWh ClC5K3YxBiXtzkMsouyKih8= =uDi2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 07:34:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23BFE16A4B3 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:34:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: from smtp5.wlink.com.np (smtp5.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B2AD43E38 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:30:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: (qmail 79577 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2006 07:27:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp1.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.76) by 0 with SMTP; 15 Dec 2006 07:27:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 13253 invoked by uid 98); 15 Dec 2006 07:32:33 -0000 Received: from 202.79.36.216 by smtp1.wlink.com.np (envelope-from , uid 1009) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.88.4/2205. Clear:RC:1(202.79.36.216):. Processed in 0.025357 secs); 15 Dec 2006 07:32:33 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: teklimbu@wlink.com.np via smtp1.wlink.com.np X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(202.79.36.216):. Processed in 0.025357 secs) Received: from [202.79.36.216] (HELO teklimbu.wlink.com.np) by smtp1.wlink.com.np (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 15 Dec 2006 07:32:30 -0000 (Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:17:30 +0545) Received: (qmail 84503 invoked by uid 1009); 15 Dec 2006 07:43:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO teklimbu.wlink.com.np) (202.79.36.216) by teklimbu.wlink.com.np with SMTP; 15 Dec 2006 07:43:21 -0000 Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:28:21 +0545 From: Tek Bahadur Limbu To: "Chad Gross" Message-Id: <20061215132821.63ee7df6.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> In-Reply-To: <17489c7a0612140534l475bc427l28292e5de8adb098@mail.gmail.com> References: <20061214145735.658f44b4.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> <20061214090811.GE18145@rescomp.berkeley.edu> <20061214175501.04c4bcb2.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> <17489c7a0612140534l475bc427l28292e5de8adb098@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.0 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Check-By: smtp1.wlink.com.np Spam: No ; 0.8 / 5.0 X-Spam-Status-WL: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, ccowart@rescomp.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: Local DNS Caching not caching on external interface X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:34:14 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:34:11 -0500 "Chad Gross" wrote: > On 12/14/06, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote: > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:08:11 -0800 > > Christopher Cowart wrote: > > > > > On 14:57 Thu 14 Dec , Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote: > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > I am very new to Bind and FreeBSD. > > > > > > > > I have just configured a Local DNS server using the built-in > > > > Bind 9.3.1 on a FreeBSD 5.4 machine. > > > > > > > > My problem is that the machine can cache queries on the > > > > localhost and loop back (127.0.0.1) interface only. > > > > > > > > I have a public static IP on this machine too and I can't seem > > > > to query the caching name server from my local network. > > > > > > > > In Linux, this is no problem. I just can't seem to get Bind to > > > > work as in my local network. It works only on the loopback > > > > interface. > > > > > > The default /etc/namedb/named.conf configuration file for BIND > > > says: > > > > > > | // If named is being used only as a local resolver, this is a > > > | safe default. // For named to be accessible to the network, > > > | comment this option, specify // the proper IP address, or > > > | delete this option. listen-on { 127.0.0.1; }; > > > > > > It looks like if you comment out that option, it will listen on * > > > by default. You could also add the other IP address on which you > > > want named to listen. > > > > > > -- > > > Chris Cowart > > > Network and Infrastructure Systems Administrator > > > RSSP-IT, UC Berkeley > > > "May all your pushes be popped" > > > > > > > Dear Chris, > > > > Thank you for your help. I did comment and added my public static IP > > like the following: > > > > > > listen-on { 202.x.x.x; }; # My Static IP > > > > Now when I do from my local PC: > > > > dig yahoo.com @202.x.x.x , I can do DNS lookups. > > > > But when I try doing that from another computer on my network, I > > can't do any DNS lookups. > > > > > > Is that anything that I miss? > > > > > > - -- > > > > > > With best regards and good wishes, > > > > Yours sincerely, > > > > Tek Bahadur Limbu > > > > (TAG/TDG Group) > > Jwl Systems Department > > > > Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. > > > > Jawalakhel, Nepal > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) > > > > iD8DBQFFgT8ZVrOl+eVhOvYRAn8OAJwOOC6+C8mnY+YBP+1GxG2uDTfWpgCfTFr1 > > 168ArGMkI0+9Qj/MpzFbmUo= > > =p9RV > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > > > > You have to tell the other machines on your network to use the IP of > the local DNS server for domain name resolution. If you are using > DHCP you can configure your DHCP server to give this information with > the IP. Otherwise you must manually do it, which will be different > between operating systems. > > HINT: In FreeBSD add the IP of the DNS server to /etc/resolve.conf > > Chad > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Dear Chad, Thanks for the tip. I am using static public IPs in all my machines in my network. Yes I have added the IP of the local caching nameserver in /etc/resolve.conf but it still not resolving. I am still puzzled and any help would be appreciated. As I said, the local caching nameserver can resolve domain names on it's own but I can't seem to use it from my network. Thanks. -- With best regards and good wishes, Yours sincerely, Tek Bahadur Limbu (TAG/TDG Group) Jwl Systems Department Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. Jawalakhel, Nepal -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFglIZVrOl+eVhOvYRAu2eAJ0RoV9ajmjUxoAa6BWM+jHjsUpjDACePkA8 Robngcewgz8oiDfuhUZZySE= =qtSI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 07:45:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F4416A415 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:45:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: from smtp5.wlink.com.np (smtp5.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9869D43CA6 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:44:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: (qmail 82410 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2006 07:40:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp1.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.76) by 0 with SMTP; 15 Dec 2006 07:40:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 18050 invoked by uid 98); 15 Dec 2006 07:45:42 -0000 Received: from 202.79.36.216 by smtp1.wlink.com.np (envelope-from , uid 1009) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.88.4/2205. Clear:RC:1(202.79.36.216):. Processed in 0.033198 secs); 15 Dec 2006 07:45:42 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: teklimbu@wlink.com.np via smtp1.wlink.com.np X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(202.79.36.216):. Processed in 0.033198 secs) Received: from [202.79.36.216] (HELO teklimbu.wlink.com.np) by smtp1.wlink.com.np (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 15 Dec 2006 07:45:39 -0000 (Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:30:39 +0545) Received: (qmail 87627 invoked by uid 1009); 15 Dec 2006 07:56:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO teklimbu.wlink.com.np) (202.79.36.216) by teklimbu.wlink.com.np with SMTP; 15 Dec 2006 07:56:28 -0000 Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:41:28 +0545 From: Tek Bahadur Limbu To: "Chad Gross" Message-Id: <20061215134128.d3b94153.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> In-Reply-To: <17489c7a0612140534l475bc427l28292e5de8adb098@mail.gmail.com> References: <20061214145735.658f44b4.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> <20061214090811.GE18145@rescomp.berkeley.edu> <20061214175501.04c4bcb2.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> <17489c7a0612140534l475bc427l28292e5de8adb098@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.0 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Check-By: smtp1.wlink.com.np Spam: No ; 0.8 / 5.0 X-Spam-Status-WL: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, ccowart@rescomp.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: Local DNS Caching not caching on external interface X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:45:54 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:34:11 -0500 "Chad Gross" wrote: > On 12/14/06, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote: > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:08:11 -0800 > > Christopher Cowart wrote: > > > > > On 14:57 Thu 14 Dec , Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote: > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > I am very new to Bind and FreeBSD. > > > > > > > > I have just configured a Local DNS server using the built-in > > > > Bind 9.3.1 on a FreeBSD 5.4 machine. > > > > > > > > My problem is that the machine can cache queries on the > > > > localhost and loop back (127.0.0.1) interface only. > > > > > > > > I have a public static IP on this machine too and I can't seem > > > > to query the caching name server from my local network. > > > > > > > > In Linux, this is no problem. I just can't seem to get Bind to > > > > work as in my local network. It works only on the loopback > > > > interface. > > > > > > The default /etc/namedb/named.conf configuration file for BIND > > > says: > > > > > > | // If named is being used only as a local resolver, this is a > > > | safe default. // For named to be accessible to the network, > > > | comment this option, specify // the proper IP address, or > > > | delete this option. listen-on { 127.0.0.1; }; > > > > > > It looks like if you comment out that option, it will listen on * > > > by default. You could also add the other IP address on which you > > > want named to listen. > > > > > > -- > > > Chris Cowart > > > Network and Infrastructure Systems Administrator > > > RSSP-IT, UC Berkeley > > > "May all your pushes be popped" > > > > > > > Dear Chris, > > > > Thank you for your help. I did comment and added my public static IP > > like the following: > > > > > > listen-on { 202.x.x.x; }; # My Static IP > > > > Now when I do from my local PC: > > > > dig yahoo.com @202.x.x.x , I can do DNS lookups. > > > > But when I try doing that from another computer on my network, I > > can't do any DNS lookups. > > > > > > Is that anything that I miss? > > > > > > - -- > > > > > > With best regards and good wishes, > > > > Yours sincerely, > > > > Tek Bahadur Limbu > > > > (TAG/TDG Group) > > Jwl Systems Department > > > > Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. > > > > Jawalakhel, Nepal > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) > > > > iD8DBQFFgT8ZVrOl+eVhOvYRAn8OAJwOOC6+C8mnY+YBP+1GxG2uDTfWpgCfTFr1 > > 168ArGMkI0+9Qj/MpzFbmUo= > > =p9RV > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > > > > You have to tell the other machines on your network to use the IP of > the local DNS server for domain name resolution. If you are using > DHCP you can configure your DHCP server to give this information with > the IP. Otherwise you must manually do it, which will be different > between operating systems. > > HINT: In FreeBSD add the IP of the DNS server to /etc/resolve.conf > > Chad > Dear Chad, I just get the following logs while troubleshooting with tcpdump. local nameserver IP: 202.102.5.100 network PC IP: 202.102.5.50 When I do a nslookup of yahoo and google from network PC using the local caching nameserver, I only get this on the caching nameserver. 13:23:58.707604 IP 202.102.5.50.44778 > 202.102.5.100.53: 56955+ A? google.com. (28) 13:23:32.899379 IP 202.102.5.50.40229 > 202.102.5.100.53: 47636+ A? yahoo.com. (27) Note: Please note that the above Static IPs are just arbitrary values. Can you please shed some light on this issue? - -- With best regards and good wishes, Yours sincerely, Tek Bahadur Limbu (TAG/TDG Group) Jwl Systems Department Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. Jawalakhel, Nepal -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFglUsVrOl+eVhOvYRAsmMAJ9sb0fGdKiPp89CszMg5dXkvteojQCfdk0e fW0ofW8HJYq4RZXuROX7zPw= =5Ieg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 08:49:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E00916A415 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 08:49:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952DC43CAC for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 08:47:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from stat.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Gv8kz-0006pM-6V; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:49:29 +0300 Received: from bsam by ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Gv8m5-0004U8-VH; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:50:37 +0300 To: "Brian Levie" References: <000601c71ec3$52516330$ba01a8c0@brianlevie> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:50:37 +0300 In-Reply-To: <000601c71ec3$52516330$ba01a8c0@brianlevie> (Brian Levie's message of "Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:31:04 -0000") Message-ID: <11330658@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Failure to compile X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 08:49:31 -0000 [CC to freebsd-questions@ restored] Hello Brian! Please, try to not top-post. It's hard to track the thread. Thanks. On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:31:04 -0000 Brian Levie wrote: > Thanks for your reply, Sorry for the delay (I've been a little bit busy). BTW if you cc'ed to freebsd-questions@ you may be able to get an answer from somebody else much faster. ;-) > FreeBSD is installed in a 1.5Gb partition the rest is windows XP, downloaded > an iso file from the web. OK. Then you should got a system compiler which was overwritten by Xenix one. > By Unix files I mean data files which I wrote firstly on a machine running > Xenix then this was updated to a server running Unix. These files were used > to compile many programs that I wrote in those days. Xenix installation > disks are now unobtainable, so I thought I would try FreeBSD> I think that you may try to compile your programms by the system compiler (or one from the ports system) and adopt the sources when needed. > Uname -a: FreeBSD 6.1-Release 6.1 Release #0: Sun May 7 04:32:13 UTC > 2006root@apres cse buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 > File: /usr/bin/cc Microsoft a.outseperate pin semented word swapped not > stripped V2.3 V3.0 386 small model executable not stripped Yep, that's why you got "Exec format error". FreeBSD is capable of running binaries from some other OSes but Xenix is not among them. > Ls -l: -rwx--x--x 1 root wheel 37376 Nov 3 1993 /usr/bin/cc ...which then you overwrote by another one. > I hope this is of some help. Well, to receive a working OS you may either reinstall it or do a binary update (imho rebuilding is not an option since you overwrote some system binaries). > -----Original Message----- > From: Boris Samorodov [mailto:bsam@ipt.ru] > Sent: 12 December 2006 22:27 > To: Brian Levie > Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Re: Failure to compile > Hello Brian and welcome! > On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:38:19 -0000 Brian Levie wrote: > > I recently installed FreeBSD 6.1, > How did you do it? > > and copied many Unix files with no > What do you call "Unix files" and where did you get them? > > problems at all. However when I try to run the C compiler which worked > fine > > with Unix, I get the error message '/usr/bin/cc Exec format error Binary > > file not executable'. I tried changing permissions and owner with no > change. > Please, show us the output of commands "uname -a", "file /usr/bin/cc" > and "ls -l /usr/bin/cc". > > Any suggestions or won't the unix C compiler not work with FreeBSD? > Well, FreeBSD is used to be compiled by this compiler. Those troubles > of yours shouldn't happen. ;-) WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 11:35:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF4116A407 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:35:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from nagual.nl (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.10.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0439443CD5 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:33:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.nl with local; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:35:05 +0100 id 00039826.45828869.00017957 Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:35:05 +0100 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20061215113505.GA96570@lothlorien.nagual.nl> References: <20061213231719.GY873@routeduvel.rembrandtkd.welmers.net> <45809593.5000902@chillt.de> <20061214001809.GZ873@routeduvel.rembrandtkd.welmers.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061214001809.GZ873@routeduvel.rembrandtkd.welmers.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i From: dick hoogendijk Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] gamin/fam issues with KDE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:35:39 -0000 On 14 Dec Bastiaan Welmers wrote: > One nasty thing is that when afterwards installing a package requiring > gamin, it will fail with errors. To prevent this you could just "fake" > the pkg db that gamin is installed however actually fam libraries are > installed. And how exactly is this "faking" done? I'm no fan of gamin too and if possible I compiled my programs for fam. But this sounds nice ;-) -- http://nagual.nl/ --- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 6.1 ++ Solaris 10 11/06 ++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 12:56:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D965516A412 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:56:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jwb@hera.homer.att.com) Received: from mail120.messagelabs.com (mail120.messagelabs.com [216.82.250.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0059243CAC for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:55:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jwb@hera.homer.att.com) X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: jwb@hera.homer.att.com X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-120.messagelabs.com!1166187406!19482444!1 X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.10.7; banners=-,-,- X-Originating-IP: [134.24.146.4] Received: (qmail 19179 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2006 12:56:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO attrh8i.attrh.att.com) (134.24.146.4) by server-9.tower-120.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 15 Dec 2006 12:56:46 -0000 Received: from attrh.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by attrh8i.attrh.att.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id kBFCsnrR000901; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:54:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from ulysses.homer.att.com (ulysses.homer.att.com [135.205.193.8]) by attrh8i.attrh.att.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id kBFCshuB000884; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:54:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from hera.homer.att.com (hera.homer.att.com [135.205.193.102]) by ulysses.homer.att.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA24161; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:56:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from hera.homer.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.homer.att.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA19104; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:56:39 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200612151256.HAA19104@hera.homer.att.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Pieter de Goeje In-Reply-To: Message from Pieter de Goeje of "Wed, 06 Dec 2006 20:53:41 +0100." <200612062053.41588.pieter@degoeje.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:56:39 -0500 From: "J. W. Ballantine" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: system bootup console setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:56:48 -0000 Pieter, Thanks for the response, but I may have asked the wrong question. I have two systems running 6-STABLE, one on a desktop pc and one on a laptop. Both have saver="logo" in rc.conf, but the laptop fails to load it: logo_saver: the console does not support M_VGA_CG320 Module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (logo_saver, 0xc266aac8, 0) error 19 I thought the problem was that the laptop console was not correctly set-up, is should support the logo, but /etc/rc.conf, /etc/defaults/rc.conf (System Consoles), and /etc/ttys (ttyv*) are all identical. So was I wrong with my thought, or is there somewhere else I should be looking? Jim ---------- In Response to your message ------------- > Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 20:53:41 +0100 > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > From: Pieter de Goeje > Subject: Re: system bootup console setup > > On Wednesday 06 December 2006 20:00, J. W. Ballantine wrote: > > Ok, I should be able to find this somewhere > > in the documentation, but I can't (must be looking > > for the wrong key words). > > > > When the system boots, the consoles need to be initialized > > and defined somewhere. I want to change the definition, but > > I can't find the startup script that init's them. Which one > > is it? > /etc/ttys > and > allscreens_* in rc.conf > > Cheers, > Pieter de Goeje > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 13:26:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCC316A505 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:26:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B4843D9B for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:24:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so425647pyh for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 05:25:41 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=FNz5nxaxJG54byA4XVZFb7FgHcUMDUnAFhvkmdfqiibFZgbmjg6UFncNBfToW/EkvEgS6RAaru08h9bU1jld+XPeIqetEMhxNkTwkYfW2w373fcX3HE53uZ0oJmWtp+5XgrA0QkF44+bm/nl6iJKFMjv3rMS8WtYW81wD7eGO6o= Received: by 10.65.219.6 with SMTP id w6mr3143131qbq.1166189141397; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 05:25:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.75.14 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 05:25:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <17489c7a0612150525v28657c0aib64d14a9b9daf30d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 08:25:41 -0500 From: "Chad Gross" To: "Tek Bahadur Limbu" In-Reply-To: <20061215134128.d3b94153.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061214145735.658f44b4.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> <20061214090811.GE18145@rescomp.berkeley.edu> <20061214175501.04c4bcb2.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> <17489c7a0612140534l475bc427l28292e5de8adb098@mail.gmail.com> <20061215134128.d3b94153.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, ccowart@rescomp.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: Local DNS Caching not caching on external interface X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:26:43 -0000 On 12/15/06, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:34:11 -0500 > "Chad Gross" wrote: > > > On 12/14/06, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote: > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:08:11 -0800 > > > Christopher Cowart wrote: > > > > > > > On 14:57 Thu 14 Dec , Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote: > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > > > I am very new to Bind and FreeBSD. > > > > > > > > > > I have just configured a Local DNS server using the built-in > > > > > Bind 9.3.1 on a FreeBSD 5.4 machine. > > > > > > > > > > My problem is that the machine can cache queries on the > > > > > localhost and loop back (127.0.0.1) interface only. > > > > > > > > > > I have a public static IP on this machine too and I can't seem > > > > > to query the caching name server from my local network. > > > > > > > > > > In Linux, this is no problem. I just can't seem to get Bind to > > > > > work as in my local network. It works only on the loopback > > > > > interface. > > > > > > > > The default /etc/namedb/named.conf configuration file for BIND > > > > says: > > > > > > > > | // If named is being used only as a local resolver, this is a > > > > | safe default. // For named to be accessible to the network, > > > > | comment this option, specify // the proper IP address, or > > > > | delete this option. listen-on { 127.0.0.1; }; > > > > > > > > It looks like if you comment out that option, it will listen on * > > > > by default. You could also add the other IP address on which you > > > > want named to listen. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Chris Cowart > > > > Network and Infrastructure Systems Administrator > > > > RSSP-IT, UC Berkeley > > > > "May all your pushes be popped" > > > > > > > > > > Dear Chris, > > > > > > Thank you for your help. I did comment and added my public static IP > > > like the following: > > > > > > > > > listen-on { 202.x.x.x; }; # My Static IP > > > > > > Now when I do from my local PC: > > > > > > dig yahoo.com @202.x.x.x , I can do DNS lookups. > > > > > > But when I try doing that from another computer on my network, I > > > can't do any DNS lookups. > > > > > > > > > Is that anything that I miss? > > > > > > > > > - -- > > > > > > > > > With best regards and good wishes, > > > > > > Yours sincerely, > > > > > > Tek Bahadur Limbu > > > > > > (TAG/TDG Group) > > > Jwl Systems Department > > > > > > Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. > > > > > > Jawalakhel, Nepal > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) > > > > > > iD8DBQFFgT8ZVrOl+eVhOvYRAn8OAJwOOC6+C8mnY+YBP+1GxG2uDTfWpgCfTFr1 > > > 168ArGMkI0+9Qj/MpzFbmUo= > > > =p9RV > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > You have to tell the other machines on your network to use the IP of > > the local DNS server for domain name resolution. If you are using > > DHCP you can configure your DHCP server to give this information with > > the IP. Otherwise you must manually do it, which will be different > > between operating systems. > > > > HINT: In FreeBSD add the IP of the DNS server to /etc/resolve.conf > > > > Chad > > > > > Dear Chad, > > I just get the following logs while troubleshooting with tcpdump. > > local nameserver IP: 202.102.5.100 > network PC IP: 202.102.5.50 > > When I do a nslookup of yahoo and google from network PC using the > local caching nameserver, I only get this on the caching nameserver. > > 13:23:58.707604 IP 202.102.5.50.44778 > 202.102.5.100.53: 56955+ A? > google.com. (28) > 13:23:32.899379 IP 202.102.5.50.40229 > 202.102.5.100.53: 47636+ A? > yahoo.com. (27) > > > Note: Please note that the above Static IPs are just arbitrary values. > > Can you please shed some light on this issue? > > - -- > > > With best regards and good wishes, > > Yours sincerely, > > Tek Bahadur Limbu > > (TAG/TDG Group) > Jwl Systems Department > > Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. > > Jawalakhel, Nepal > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) > > iD8DBQFFglUsVrOl+eVhOvYRAsmMAJ9sb0fGdKiPp89CszMg5dXkvteojQCfdk0e > fW0ofW8HJYq4RZXuROX7zPw= > =5Ieg > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > Tek, Can you please post your Bind configuration files? Have you done a tcpdump or wireshark capture on both machines while issuing the resolution request? Could you please do that as well and post the results? Chad From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 13:44:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C5916A407 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:44:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mav@mavhome.dp.ua) Received: from cmail.optima.ua (cmail.optima.ua [195.248.191.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA2243D1D for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:42:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mav@mavhome.dp.ua) X-Spam-Level: 64 [XX] (100%) BAYESIAN TRAINING: 100 Received: from [212.86.226.11] (account mav@alkar.net [212.86.226.11] verified) by cmail.optima.ua (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.11) with ESMTPA id 19021514 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:43:46 +0200 Message-ID: <4582A692.1010302@mavhome.dp.ua> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:43:46 +0200 From: Alexander Motin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20051108 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: MPPC compression implementations legal status? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:44:12 -0000 Hi. Can anybody explain me for sure current license status of Microsoft Point-to-Point Compression (MPPC) Protocol? It is not implemented in FreeBSD for years and I think it would be good to change this. In RFC 2118 told that "Source and object licenses are available on a non-discriminatory basis from Stac Electronics". Does it means requirement to get license to use HIFN implementation of this protocol or also denies any other free implementation? How does it coexist with Microsoft's "ROYALTY FREE PROTOCOL LICENSE AGREEMENT", http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms818807.aspx. Doesn't this agreement allows free implementation of server side protocols for cooperation with Windows client systems? -- Alexander Motin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 13:44:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D9B16A503 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:44:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chavan.pr@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC6AC43CB6 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:42:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chavan.pr@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so409189nzh for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 05:44:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=MW05i0fEuUFbtHunhpQwD8MUZO4chJV98H/ctjjs6giEhIcYmwcmLL1LHSIVjv+r33txLDOAeQqM1EKnI5A52zv2aYnOSuegH4X3c+IFm9HBdpgwmUGVVonqVsYy+G0gnqSFo+Y0bnIl843OLoZIFJ2pNbATwSl8tmQSGbErYoY= Received: by 10.65.154.10 with SMTP id g10mr1180343qbo.1166190261813; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 05:44:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.253.15 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 05:44:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4782befa0612150544o1ac5e955sae67cf9fe1172ad8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:14:21 +0530 From: "prashant chavan" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Hi X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:44:40 -0000 Hi I wanna know how to add system module to FreeBSD. If any clarification reqd plz let me know. Thanks in advance! pcpat From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 13:47:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B593416A49E for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:47:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vsrivastav@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B0943CBE for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:45:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vsrivastav@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so683853wxc for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 05:47:30 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=sE6ZoUHKNEnWI8C9rPKYg/kEjPzlvYJpYehJUl8lWALAw2zw50q2Ab/C2QwipPcfwQETOoYlNaNGKXo1mhMr1w5/er0CwTX2fV1HrbgLgku57nQ0PmlikZJFbQoMKknjryoFDMClzbgmeRIGHCeFP1pnpC7VUaj/ZnudHLLIe9c= Received: by 10.70.32.10 with SMTP id f10mr1055117wxf.1166190450469; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 05:47:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.193.118? ( [12.178.90.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i11sm3513278wxd.2006.12.15.05.47.29; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 05:47:29 -0800 (PST) From: Vivek Srivastav To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 08:47:25 -0500 Message-Id: <1166190445.20205.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 (2.8.2.1-2.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Need to simplify a script that makes cool trees X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:47:41 -0000 I may be responding a little late but just saw your post and no answers posted. Maybe you have already sorted out your problem: Here is a simple modification of your script. Put this function in your .bashrc and use the tree command. tree () { dirs=${@:-.}; echo "Listing $dirs"; for i in $dirs; do find $i -name \* | sed -e 's,^.$,,' \ -e '/^$/d' \ -e 's,[^/]*/\([^/]*\)$,+-----\1,' \ -e 's,[^/]*/,| ,g'; done } From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 13:49:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC94616A503 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:49:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nathan@vidican.com) Received: from wmptl.net (mail.wmptl.com [216.8.159.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DAD843D46 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:47:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nathan@vidican.com) Received: from [10.0.0.104] (r3140ca.wmptl.net [10.0.0.104]) by wmptl.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBFDn7pT004994 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 08:49:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from nathan@vidican.com) Message-ID: <4582A7D6.6010203@vidican.com> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 08:49:10 -0500 From: Nathan Vidican User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061027) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 10.0.0.80 Cc: Subject: Best supported mini-PCI wifi X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:49:28 -0000 My laptop has the wonderfully under-supported Broadcom wifi card in it. While it does work now with ndiswrapper and a few needed patches; it still doesn't work very well, to say nothing of natively. So, what does work? I've checked out the hardware notes for 6.1-R, but to no avail really... I'm looking at an Intel 2915 wireless a/b/g mini-PCI card, as Intel has always been great with supporting FreeBSD and therefore I'd much rather send my business to them... but I know very little about this card and don't know which (if any) driver supports it? Does anyone out there have this card, or another mini-PCI, (preferably not based on a broadcom chip ), that they could recommend? If driver's are in the making for the Intel mini-PCI card, I'd be happy to help test as well. Currently running 6.2-RC1/amd64 with some patchwork done to the ndiswrapper kernel module to make it work with newer Broadcom windows drivers. -- Nathan Vidican nvidican@wmptl.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 13:52:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1514C16A412 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:52:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mav@alkar.net) Received: from cmail.optima.ua (cmail.optima.ua [195.248.191.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B06043CAF for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:49:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mav@alkar.net) Received: from [212.86.226.11] (account mav@alkar.net [212.86.226.11] verified) by cmail.optima.ua (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.11) with ESMTPA id 19021757; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:51:07 +0200 Message-ID: <4582A84B.1030704@alkar.net> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:51:07 +0200 From: Alexander Motin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20051108 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: a@zeos.net References: <1164705811.00643901.1164695401@10.7.7.3> In-Reply-To: <1164705811.00643901.1164695401@10.7.7.3> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mpd 4.0b5 does not want to work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:52:35 -0000 Hi. a@zeos.net wrote: > I have compiled and installed mpd 4.0b5 > on my PC with FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE. > > Then I created the next files: > > # mpd.conf > open iface Due to b5 internal rework, syntax "open iface" is now deprecated in it's original meaning. Now it can be used only for Dial-On-Demand implemantation. You should use "open lcp" or better just "open" command. -- Alexander Motin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 14:46:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75E7916A407 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:46:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay05.ispgateway.de (smtprelay05.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E4743CA3 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:44:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 7734 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2006 14:46:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (775067@[217.50.145.128]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay05.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 15 Dec 2006 14:46:27 -0000 Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:46:11 +0100 From: Fabian Keil To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061215154611.4ea2275c@localhost> In-Reply-To: <17489c7a0612140525i46b19403k96ac866be59ca951@mail.gmail.com> References: <457C686E.5050504@locolomo.org> <20061214132434.5ac20b82@localhost> <17489c7a0612140525i46b19403k96ac866be59ca951@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.2 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-PGP-KEY-URL: http://www.fabiankeil.de/gpg-keys/freebsd-listen-2008-08-18.asc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_U6cDDYhNom4Z0Qwjf23pl3A; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Subject: Re: How safe is encrypted disks? (data integrity) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:46:49 -0000 --Sig_U6cDDYhNom4Z0Qwjf23pl3A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "Chad Gross" wrote: > On 12/14/06, Fabian Keil wrote: > > > > Erik Norgaard wrote: > > > > > I have been thinking to make /home on my laptop encrypted - seems lik= e a > > > good idea if it gets stolen. Now, how safe is this? Not in terms of t= he > > > strength of the encryption algorithm, but in terms of integrity. > > > What happens in case of power failure, the battery runs out or system > > > crashes for whatever reason? > > > > I have my home slice encrypted with GELI for several month now > > and so far I didn't notice any effects on the data integrity. > > > > I experienced several system crashes and one or two power failures > > do to empty battery but I didn't lose any data already saved > > on the disk (that I know of). > > > > The only inconvenience is that the system boots to single-user > > mode if the home slice isn't clean and I then have to fsck it > > manually. > > > > At that point the password for the key is already entered, > > so I'm not sure why the slice can't be fscked automatically. > > It could be the .eli extension, but I didn't investigate this > > any further. > Yes the manual fsck is a pain. I am not sure why it has to be done manual= ly > either, but I don't think it is just the .eli extension. Did you notice = you > have to specify that it is UFS as well? Yes, I forgot to mention it because I now always call fsck_ffs directly. I guess this could also explain why it has to be done manually. Fabian --=20 http://www.fabiankeil.de/ --Sig_U6cDDYhNom4Z0Qwjf23pl3A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFgrU9BYqIVf93VJ0RAiFtAJ9oIhz/kOiUhbJkcON4weOzRY626ACfRZzx Co7dwvf0Rt+xDUm4Y788UGU= =uz6a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_U6cDDYhNom4Z0Qwjf23pl3A-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 14:48:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1F616A407 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:48:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chavan.pr@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.235]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935D243CAE for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:47:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chavan.pr@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so417882nzh for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 06:48:41 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=qO6CBhkhp9jsPltMxjG9ilaVKYJjenQQ9xNVSVd5dAyU2a2Lpin+zVFOYSqdWuf0IXoW8zXZo/9VRVP3WbkTcAqrHORdpF2jGGvEAc01GeR24w131CRN/rSOvJF8H9dzF3Zdonixna889LWYo/mxre0goAqYMAz7TISIssW2VRo= Received: by 10.64.131.4 with SMTP id e4mr1103384qbd.1166194121572; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 06:48:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.253.15 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 06:48:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4782befa0612150648o57b5754eheebd03842094932a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:18:41 +0530 From: "prashant chavan" To: "FreeBSD forum" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: How to add session extension to phpApache X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:48:46 -0000 Hi I have installed phpApache but have not included *session extension*. Now i want to include session extension.But dont know how to add it. Please let me know if any more clarification required. thanks! pcpat From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 14:48:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E6A16A49E; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:48:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from melon.pingpong.net (melon.pingpong.net [195.178.174.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0822943CB3; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:47:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from girgen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.pingpong.net [127.0.0.1]) by melon.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012CB508CF; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:48:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from melon.pingpong.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (melon.pingpong.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 28929-01-10; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:48:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.187] (unknown [213.136.40.204]) by melon.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 389EE5084F; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:48:52 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:48:39 +0100 From: Palle Girgensohn To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <92F17ADAEC575CF1EDBE870C@rambutan.pingpong.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="==========77CD9078C0D16C366468==========" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at pingpong.net Cc: shigeaki@se.hiroshima-u.ac.jp, obrien@freebsd.org Subject: if_nfe on nVidia chipset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:48:59 -0000 --==========77CD9078C0D16C366468========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi! Sorry for the cross post, I'd love to know if I can get this working or not. Regards, Palle ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Date: tisdag, december 12, 2006 18.52.35 +0100 From: Palle Girgensohn To: hardware@freebsd.org Subject: if_nfe on Asus M2N-SLI deluxe? Hi! Does anybody know if if_nfe should work on the above motherboard? I snached the patch for FreeBSD-6.2 from and tried it. The kernel and ifconfig seems happy, but it does not work; ifconfig reports "active" but ifconfig reports: nfe0: flags=8802 mtu 1500 options=1b ether 00:17:31:86:aa:31 media: Ethernet autoselect (none) status: no carrier nfe1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=1b inet6 fe80::217:31ff:fe86:b4c6%nfe1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 inet 192.168.1.191 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 ether 00:17:31:86:b4:c6 media: Ethernet autoselect (none) status: active lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 The media part of nfe1 looks bad, eh? Is it supposed to work? How can I help to get it working? FreeBSD 6.2-stable, around RC1. Enclosed is a dmesg. Anything else needed? /Palle ---------- End Forwarded Message ---------- --==========77CD9078C0D16C366468========== Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="if_nfe on Asus M2N-SLI deluxe?" Return-Path: Received: from melon.pingpong.net ([unix socket]) by melon.pingpong.net (Cyrus v2.2.12) with LMTPA; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:05:37 +0100 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Received: from localhost (localhost.pingpong.net [127.0.0.1]) by melon.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2929F5087D for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:05:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from melon.pingpong.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (melon.pingpong.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 79691-01-45 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:05:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by melon.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3024850852 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:05:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [69.147.83.54]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B06E53B22; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:52:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F6016A591; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:52:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org) X-Original-To: hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D05C16A40F; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:52:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from melon.pingpong.net (melon.pingpong.net [195.178.174.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E9F43CB8; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:51:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from girgen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.pingpong.net [127.0.0.1]) by melon.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6C950890; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:52:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from melon.pingpong.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (melon.pingpong.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 68252-03-5; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:52:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.187] (unknown [213.136.40.204]) by melon.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938C750853; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:52:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:52:35 +0100 From: Palle Girgensohn To: hardware@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="==========7E13988D9A82C0ED67D9==========" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at pingpong.net Cc: obrien@freebsd.org Subject: if_nfe on Asus M2N-SLI deluxe? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Errors-To: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at pingpong.net --==========7E13988D9A82C0ED67D9========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; DELSP=yes; FORMAT=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi! Does anybody know if if_nfe should work on the above motherboard? I snached the patch for FreeBSD-6.2 from and tried it. The kernel and ifconfig seems happy, but it does not work; ifconfig reports "active" but ifconfig reports: nfe0: flags=8802 mtu 1500 options=1b ether 00:17:31:86:aa:31 media: Ethernet autoselect (none) status: no carrier nfe1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=1b inet6 fe80::217:31ff:fe86:b4c6%nfe1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 inet 192.168.1.191 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 ether 00:17:31:86:b4:c6 media: Ethernet autoselect (none) status: active lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 The media part of nfe1 looks bad, eh? Is it supposed to work? How can I help to get it working? FreeBSD 6.2-stable, around RC1. Enclosed is a dmesg. Anything else needed? /Palle --==========7E13988D9A82C0ED67D9========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; name="dmesg.boot" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="dmesg.boot"; size=8114 Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Wed Nov 29 11:57:06 CET 2006 girgen@rambutan.pingpong.net:/usr/obj/.a/banan/usr/src/sys/WORKSTATION Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3500+ (2210.20-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin =3D "AuthenticAMD" Id =3D 0x40ff2 Stepping =3D 2 = Features=3D0x78bfbff Features2=3D0x2001 AMD Features=3D0xea500800 AMD Features2=3D0x1d,,CR8> real memory =3D 2146369536 (2046 MB) avail memory =3D 2091245568 (1994 MB) ACPI APIC Table: ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard acpi0: on motherboard acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi0: Power Button (fixed) acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pci0: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 1.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pci0: at device 1.1 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 1.2 (no driver attached) ohci0: mem 0xfe02f000-0xfe02ffff irq 21 at = device 2.0 on pci0 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 10 ports with 10 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xfe02e000-0xfe02e0ff irq 22 = at device 2.1 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: EHCI version 1.0 usb1: companion controller, 10 ports each: usb0 usb1: on ehci0 usb1: USB revision 2.0 uhub1: nVidia EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 10 ports with 10 removable, self powered atapci0: port = 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xf400-0xf40f at device 4.0 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 atapci1: port = 0x9f0-0x9f7,0xbf0-0xbf3,0x970-0x977,0xb70-0xb73,0xe000-0xe00f mem = 0xfe02d000-0xfe02dfff irq 23 at device 5.0 on pci0 ata2: on atapci1 ata3: on atapci1 atapci2: port = 0x9e0-0x9e7,0xbe0-0xbe3,0x960-0x967,0xb60-0xb63,0xcc00-0xcc0f mem = 0xfe02c000-0xfe02cfff irq 20 at device 5.1 on pci0 ata4: on atapci2 ata5: on atapci2 atapci3: port = 0xc800-0xc807,0xc400-0xc403,0xc000-0xc007,0xbc00-0xbc03,0xb800-0xb80f mem = 0xfe02b000-0xfe02bfff irq 21 at device 5.2 on pci0 ata6: on atapci3 ata7: on atapci3 pcib1: at device 6.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 fxp0: port 0xac00-0xac1f mem = 0xfdeff000-0xfdefffff,0xfdc00000-0xfdcfffff irq 16 at device 6.0 on pci1 miibus0: on fxp0 inphy0: on miibus0 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto fxp0: Ethernet address: 00:a0:c9:ce:11:26 fwohci0: mem = 0xfddff000-0xfddff7ff,0xfddf8000-0xfddfbfff irq 19 at device 11.0 on pci1 fwohci0: OHCI version 1.10 (ROM=3D1) fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 4. fwohci0: EUI64 00:11:d8:00:00:c8:2b:85 fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 2 ports. fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. firewire0: on fwohci0 fwe0: on firewire0 if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:11:d8:c8:2b:85 fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:11:d8:c8:2b:85 fwe0: if_start running deferred for Giant sbp0: on firewire0 fwohci0: Initiate bus reset fwohci0: node_id=3D0xc800ffc0, gen=3D1, CYCLEMASTER mode firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop <=3D 0, cable IRM =3D 0 (me) firewire0: bus manager 0 (me) pci0: at device 6.1 (no driver attached) nfe0: port 0xb400-0xb407 mem = 0xfe02a000-0xfe02afff,0xfe029000-0xfe0290ff,0xfe028000-0xfe02800f irq 23 at = device 8.0 on pci0 miibus1: on nfe0 e1000phy0: on miibus1 e1000phy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX-FDX, = auto nfe0: Ethernet address: 00:17:31:86:aa:31 nfe1: port 0xb000-0xb007 mem = 0xfe027000-0xfe027fff,0xfe026000-0xfe0260ff,0xfe025000-0xfe02500f irq 20 at = device 9.0 on pci0 miibus2: on nfe1 e1000phy1: on miibus2 e1000phy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX-FDX, = auto nfe1: Ethernet address: 00:17:31:86:b4:c6 pcib2: at device 10.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 pcib3: at device 11.0 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 pcib4: at device 12.0 on pci0 pci4: on pcib4 pcib5: at device 13.0 on pci0 pci5: on pcib5 pcib6: at device 14.0 on pci0 pci6: on pcib6 atapci4: port = 0x9c00-0x9c07,0x9800-0x9803,0x9400-0x9407,0x9000-0x9003,0x8c00-0x8c0f mem = 0xfdafe000-0xfdafffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci6 atapci4: AHCI Version 01.00 controller with 2 ports detected ata8: on atapci4 ata9: on atapci4 ata10: on atapci4 pcib7: at device 15.0 on pci0 pci7: on pcib7 nvidia0: mem = 0xfa000000-0xfaffffff,0xe0000000-0xefffffff,0xfb000000-0xfbffffff irq 16 at = device 0.0 on pci7 nvidia0: [GIANT-LOCKED] acpi_tz0: on acpi0 fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FAST] sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on = acpi0 sio0: type 16550A ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on acpi0 ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: on ppc0 ppi0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xd0000-0xd3fff,0xd4000-0xd67ff on isa0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=3D0x300> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 ukbd0: Logitech HID compliant keyboard, rev 1.10/1.80, addr 2, iclass 3/1 kbd1 at ukbd0 uhid0: Logitech HID compliant keyboard, rev 1.10/1.80, addr 2, iclass 3/1 ums0: Logitech USB-PS/2 Optical Mouse, rev 2.00/18.00, addr 3, iclass 3/1 ums0: 6 buttons and Z dir. Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2210201999 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 0.801 msec ipfw2 (+ipv6) initialized, divert loadable, rule-based forwarding disabled, = default to accept, logging disabled ad0: 152627MB at ata0-master UDMA100 acd0: DVDR at ata0-slave UDMA66 cd0 at ata0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device=20 cd0: 66.000MB/s transfers cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a --==========7E13988D9A82C0ED67D9========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hardware-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --==========7E13988D9A82C0ED67D9==========-- --==========77CD9078C0D16C366468==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 14:49:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9000A16A417 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:49:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3749043CBB for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:47:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so1098886nfc for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 06:49:39 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=qFRa4xqX83EP+a7fORPQ5k72I08AZpyY66rsH3Oza0FEYZrKLCSO2ociVssErXrPBbrHXHn+a6MI+p4CLv8CIj/IdgoSejg09ycmzH3S+Ydft1OW7h7PpSDEzyK9XACXJjnfoEdI2ySCHCoDzOiqbXEierrOCkRzWgQ1tWtyI2g= Received: by 10.49.26.18 with SMTP id d18mr23909nfj.1166194178843; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 06:49:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.167.16 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 06:49:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:49:38 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: "prashant chavan" In-Reply-To: <4782befa0612150544o1ac5e955sae67cf9fe1172ad8@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4782befa0612150544o1ac5e955sae67cf9fe1172ad8@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 487325a7b6925eed Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Hi X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:49:42 -0000 On 12/15/06, prashant chavan wrote: > Hi > > I wanna know how to add system module to FreeBSD. > If any clarification reqd plz let me know. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/index.html http://www.amazon.com/dp/0201702452/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 14:49:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD40816A47B for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:49:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob.middaugh@comcast.net) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [63.240.77.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E5C43CB5 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:48:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob.middaugh@comcast.net) Received: from freebsd (c714754e.state.nj.us[199.20.117.78]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with SMTP id <2006121514494401300nqd8ve>; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:49:44 +0000 From: "Bob M." To: prashant chavan In-Reply-To: <4782befa0612150544o1ac5e955sae67cf9fe1172ad8@mail.gmail.com> References: <4782befa0612150544o1ac5e955sae67cf9fe1172ad8@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:53:10 -0500 Message-Id: <1166194390.4048.3.camel@freebsd> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hi X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob.middaugh@comcast.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:49:45 -0000 On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 19:14 +0530, prashant chavan wrote: > Hi > > I wanna know how to add system module to FreeBSD. > If any clarification reqd plz let me know. > > Thanks in advance! > pcpat You want to load a kernel module, a .ko file? man kldload and man loader.conf It's pretty straightforward. Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 15:19:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E70916A4D0 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:19:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eric@mikestammer.com) Received: from smtp110.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp110.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB64643D6A for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:16:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eric@mikestammer.com) Received: (qmail 19763 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2006 15:18:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.mikestammer.com) (mikestammer@sbcglobal.net@70.142.210.121 with login) by smtp110.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Dec 2006 15:18:14 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mikestammer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59CB01146C; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:18:13 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mikestammer.com Received: from mail.mikestammer.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gondolin.middleearth.mikestammer.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SKXzQjLcT4hZ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:18:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from [192.168.0.21] (adsl-70-142-210-121.dsl.emhril.sbcglobal.net [70.142.210.121]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: eric) by mail.mikestammer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A8B1146B; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:18:11 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <4582BCB3.3060007@mikestammer.com> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:18:11 -0600 From: Eric User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b1 (Windows/20061206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: prashant chavan References: <4782befa0612150648o57b5754eheebd03842094932a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4782befa0612150648o57b5754eheebd03842094932a@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD forum Subject: Re: How to add session extension to phpApache X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:19:43 -0000 prashant chavan wrote: > Hi > > I have installed phpApache but have not included *session extension*. > Now i want to include session extension.But dont know how to add it. > Please let me know if any more clarification required. > > assuming its installed, just add it to your extensions.ini file, which is at /usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini if you need to install it, look for the php4-extensions or php5-extensions port which will let you install it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 15:20:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F73C16A407 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:20:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from stargate.alaskaparadise.com (114-103-74-65.gci.net [65.74.103.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B49543CB2 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:17:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: by stargate.alaskaparadise.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 3EA0245B9; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 06:19:05 -0900 (AKST) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: Alaska Paradise Travel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 06:18:47 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <4782befa0612150648o57b5754eheebd03842094932a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4782befa0612150648o57b5754eheebd03842094932a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1443421.JBJRYo6dAl"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200612150619.03584.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Cc: prashant chavan Subject: Re: How to add session extension to phpApache X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:20:40 -0000 --nextPart1443421.JBJRYo6dAl Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 15 December 2006 05:48, prashant chavan wrote: > Hi > > I have installed phpApache but have not included *session extension*. > Now i want to include session extension.But dont know how to add it. > Please let me know if any more clarification required. cd /usr/ports/www/php5-session make install clean Cheers, Beech =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart1443421.JBJRYo6dAl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFgrznp5D0B1NlT4URAlICAJ0eW0IrswH7ea6jbq5hTbXvm/zC1gCfQNnZ 3BGQRAn+HSgVV08mdUBibH0= =1HuD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1443421.JBJRYo6dAl-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 15:20:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF9316A539 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:20:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97FED43CC6 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:18:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 16294 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2006 15:19:50 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 15 Dec 2006 15:19:50 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 91C2828455; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:19:49 -0500 (EST) To: Armin Arh References: <20061215045920.GA708@pubbox.net> <200612150117.01446.amistry@am-productions.biz> <20061215062326.GD708@pubbox.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:19:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20061215062326.GD708@pubbox.net> (Armin Arh's message of "Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:23:27 +0100") Message-ID: <44wt4tmbje.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Anish Mistry , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Palm Tx + jpilot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:20:49 -0000 Armin Arh writes: > On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 01:16:46AM -0500, Anish Mistry wrote: >> > In /etc/devfs.conf: >> > perm cuaU0 0666 >> > >> > but then: >> > ## l /dev/cuaU0 >> > crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer - 0, 113 Dec 15 05:00 /dev/cuaU0 >> > >> > The /dev/devfs.conf permissions only apply when i run >> > "/etc/rc.d/devfs restart" This is a nogo because i have only 1 >> > second between pressing sync on the Handheld and clicking sync on >> > jpilot. >> man devfs.rules > > Thx. > Now devfs.rules(5) redirects me to devfs.conf(5) > which clearly states i should set > > perm cuaU0 0666 > > and i did so as described in my initial post. > Nevertheless the permissions became wrong. > Maybe it works after the next reboot, which is hard to > believe... we'll see. You need devfs.rules, *not* devfs.conf. Try the manual page for the former again. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 15:21:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E3B216A416 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:21:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.robillard@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8368B43D9A for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:19:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.robillard@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so761441uge for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:20:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=FTRJOMg5Cvl00f6DFHq3ptdY1fJmX3iujrmg6UDxSCL1M7MX4vDC+urxamLW+OLlU8I7+wH+mtkD7vYpAcFMyYE7VAHA+sW0AIN47yx8RmtxTOtX4ukKMdHIduF6LO9V0wZXwB2im60dVdGXLFB+acVfa29I8B6IN0uwBm5SfCM= Received: by 10.67.26.7 with SMTP id d7mr5270ugj.1166196030338; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:20:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.106.17 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:20:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <226ae0c60612150720w2ca49b23qd3c2784342883e90@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:20:03 -0500 From: "David Robillard" To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Phillip Upchurch Subject: Re: Legato Client for freeBSD. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:21:01 -0000 > I am running Legato on a sun server. > > I have a server running freeBSD that needs the legato backup client installed. > > Is there a working legato client for freeBSD ?? Have you tried this? ftp://ftp.legato.com/pub/Unsupported/FreeBSD_Client David -- David Robillard UNIX systems administrator & Oracle DBA CISSP, RHCE & Sun Certified Security Administrator Montreal: +1 514 966 0122 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 15:21:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5208316A810 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:21:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhongtao@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn) Received: from mail.tsinghua.edu.cn (mail.tsinghua.edu.cn [166.111.8.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8185243CAC for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:19:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zhongtao@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn) Received: from zhongtao.tsinghua.edu.cn.zhongtao@tsinghua.edu.cn([166.111.249.119]) by mail.tsinghua.edu.cn(AIMC 3.2.0.0) with SMTP id jm3445831493; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:21:11 +0800 X-MaxRuleNumber-200: 90230 115 X-MatchRuleNumber-200: 3670 123 X-Action-200: D Received: from zhongtao.tsinghua.edu.cn.zhongtao@tsinghua.edu.cn([166.111.249.119]) by mail.tsinghua.edu.cn(AIMC 3.2.0.0) with SMTP id AISP action; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:21:11 +0800 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Zhongtao Zhu Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:21:13 +0800 Message-ID: <867iwt9od2.fsf@tsinghua.edu.cn> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-AIMC-AUTH: zhongtao:mail X-AIMC-MAILFROM: zhongtao@tsinghua.edu.cn X-AIMC-Msg-ID: w0DsOvQB Subject: How to tell `portmanager' to use the option "-j max_jobs" to `make' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:21:30 -0000 Hello all, I hope to update the intalled ports, by portmanager, in my laptop with support of other more powerful machines. The `distcc' and `ccache' on the machines have been all coordinated. Thanks, -- Zhongtao Zhu Tel: 86 10 62796829 Department of Computer Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 15:36:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3737E16A403 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:36:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from rwcrmhc15.comcast.net (rwcrmhc15.comcast.net [204.127.192.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3DF943CA4 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:35:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from gimpy (c-24-118-186-172.hsd1.mn.comcast.net[24.118.186.172]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc15) with ESMTP id <20061215153652m1500qdrjge>; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:36:52 +0000 From: Josh Paetzel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:36:45 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612150936.45781.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: Peter Grigor Subject: Re: Dell 2950 & 1950 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:36:54 -0000 On Thursday 14 December 2006 08:38, Peter Grigor wrote: > I've just gotten some quotes on a few dell machines and I was > wondering now if freebsd 6.x is able to run on them properly. > Perc/5i cards and 64-bit Intel chips are my worries :) > > Anyone have any experiences they'd like to share? Anyone > successfully running mysql on an IA64 architecture with Freebsd? > > Thanks for any feedback, > > Peter > <^_^> I've been using a 1950 with FBSD 6.1-R AMD64 for some time now. If you have the broadcom NICs you'll have to grab the drivers from -STABLE or 6.2-RC1 and recompile the kernel. I haven't had the shutdown issues that other people have mentioned, but you can get them with IPMI and reboot from there if it's an issue. Lack of in OS tools for the RAID controller is an issue, but it's my understanding that that's being worked on. mysql seems to run just fine, but this is primarily a fall-over box for me and hasn't really seen 'real' loads yet. -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 16:19:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D1B16A646 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:19:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: from jan.ukrtel.net (jan.ukrtel.net [195.5.6.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B16743E56 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:14:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: from 231-74-124-91.pool.ukrtel.net ([91.124.74.231] helo=host.my.domain) by jan.ukrtel.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GvFii-0006NG-DW for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:15:36 +0200 Received: from host.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host.my.domain (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBFGFTWA001190 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:15:29 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: (from elisej@localhost) by host.my.domain (8.13.7/8.13.6/Submit) id kBFGFTOB001189 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:15:29 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:15:29 +0200 From: a@zeos.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061215161529.GA994@host.my.domain> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1164705811.00643901.1164695401@10.7.7.3> <4582A84B.1030704@alkar.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4582A84B.1030704@alkar.net> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) Subject: Re: mpd 4.0b5 does not want to work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:19:03 -0000 On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 03:51:07PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: > Hi. > > a@zeos.net wrote: > >I have compiled and installed mpd 4.0b5 > >on my PC with FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE. > >Then I created the next files: > ># mpd.conf > > open iface > > Due to b5 internal rework, syntax "open iface" is now deprecated in it's > original meaning. Now it can be used only for Dial-On-Demand implemantation. > > You should use "open lcp" or better just "open" command. > > -- > Alexander Motin > Thank you very much. I can connect to an ISP with mpd4 now. But MPD does not respond any command except ^C as before (all keys are echoed on the console). So I cannot control the process. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 16:37:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7539716A523 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:37:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brian@levie.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from xsmtp04.mail2web.com (xsmtp04.mail2web.com [168.144.250.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76B4C43D3F for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:32:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brian@levie.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from [168.144.108.12] (helo=M2W012.mail2web.com) by xsmtp04.mail2web.com with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GvG0b-0005F5-Ly; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:34:08 -0500 Message-ID: <380-220061251516345670@M2W012.mail2web.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Originating-IP: 90.240.238.208 X-URL: http://mail2web.com/ From: "brian@levie.freeserve.co.uk" To: bsam@ipt.ru Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:34:05 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Failure to compile X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: brian@levie.freeserve.co.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:37:37 -0000 Original Message: ----------------- From: Boris Samorodov bsam@ipt=2Eru Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:50:37 +0300 To: brian@levie=2Efreeserve=2Eco=2Euk, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD=2Eorg Subject: Re: Failure to compile [CC to freebsd-questions@ restored] Hello Brian! Please, try to not top-post=2E It's hard to track the thread=2E Thanks=2E On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:31:04 -0000 Brian Levie wrote: > Thanks for your reply, Sorry for the delay (I've been a little bit busy)=2E BTW if you cc'ed to freebsd-questions@ you may be able to get an answer from somebody else much faster=2E ;-) > FreeBSD is installed in a 1=2E5Gb partition the rest is windows XP, downloaded > an iso file from the web=2E OK=2E Then you should got a system compiler which was overwritten by Xenix one=2E > By Unix files I mean data files which I wrote firstly on a machine runni= ng > Xenix then this was updated to a server running Unix=2E These files wer= e used > to compile many programs that I wrote in those days=2E Xenix installati= on > disks are now unobtainable, so I thought I would try FreeBSD> I think that you may try to compile your programms by the system compiler (or one from the ports system) and adopt the sources when needed=2E > Uname -a: FreeBSD 6=2E1-Release 6=2E1 Release #0: Sun May 7 04:32:13 UT= C > 2006root@apres cse buffalo=2Eedu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 > File: /usr/bin/cc Microsoft a=2Eoutseperate pin semented word swapped = not > stripped V2=2E3 V3=2E0 386 small model executable not stripped Yep, that's why you got "Exec format error"=2E FreeBSD is capable of running binaries from some other OSes but Xenix is not among them=2E > Ls -l: -rwx--x--x 1 root wheel 37376 Nov 3 1993 /usr/bin/cc =2E=2E=2Ewhich then you overwrote by another one=2E > I hope this is of some help=2E Well, to receive a working OS you may either reinstall it or do a binary update (imho rebuilding is not an option since you overwrote some system binaries)=2E > -----Original Message----- > From: Boris Samorodov [mailto:bsam@ipt=2Eru]=20 > Sent: 12 December 2006 22:27 > To: Brian Levie > Cc: questions@FreeBSD=2Eorg > Subject: Re: Failure to compile > Hello Brian and welcome! > On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:38:19 -0000 Brian Levie wrote: > > I recently installed FreeBSD 6=2E1, > How did you do it=3F > > and copied many Unix files with no > What do you call "Unix files" and where did you get them=3F > > problems at all=2E However when I try to run the C compiler which wor= ked > fine > > with Unix, I get the error message '/usr/bin/cc Exec format error=20 Binary > > file not executable'=2E I tried changing permissions and owner with no= > change=2E > Please, show us the output of commands "uname -a", "file /usr/bin/cc" > and "ls -l /usr/bin/cc"=2E > > Any suggestions or won't the unix C compiler not work with FreeBSD=3F > Well, FreeBSD is used to be compiled by this compiler=2E Those troubles > of yours shouldn't happen=2E ;-) WBR --=20 Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www=2Eipt=2Eru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www=2EFreeBSD=2Eorg The Power To Serve I did not realise FreeBSD had a C compiler, I decided to reformat the partition and reinstall FreeBSD=2E It appeared to go well but after exiti= ng the install I cannot boot it, I get the error message ' Unable to load a Kernel', what has happened=3F Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web=2Ecom/ =2E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 16:37:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CC216A5B3 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:37:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from alnrmhc14.comcast.net (alnrmhc14.comcast.net [206.18.177.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C16E43E0E for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:34:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [208.206.151.59] (host59.gtisd.com?[208.206.151.59]) by comcast.net (alnrmhc14) with ESMTP id <20061215163507b1400lh58ve>; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:35:28 +0000 Message-ID: <4582CEBA.5020806@computer.org> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:35:06 -0600 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061111) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nathan Vidican References: <4582A7D6.6010203@vidican.com> In-Reply-To: <4582A7D6.6010203@vidican.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best supported mini-PCI wifi X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:37:51 -0000 On 12/15/2006 07:49, Nathan Vidican wrote: > My laptop has the wonderfully under-supported Broadcom wifi card in it. > While it does work now with ndiswrapper and a few needed patches; it > still doesn't work very well, to say nothing of natively. > > So, what does work? I've checked out the hardware notes for 6.1-R, but > to no avail really... I don't know if its "the best supported" or not. But I'm using an atheros based card. And it works quite well. > I'm looking at an Intel 2915 wireless a/b/g > mini-PCI card, as Intel has always been great with supporting FreeBSD > and therefore I'd much rather send my business to them... but I know > very little about this card and don't know which (if any) driver > supports it? Does anyone out there have this card, or another mini-PCI, > (preferably not based on a broadcom chip ), that they could recommend? > > If driver's are in the making for the Intel mini-PCI card, I'd be happy > to help test as well. Currently running 6.2-RC1/amd64 with some > patchwork done to the ndiswrapper kernel module to make it work with > newer Broadcom windows drivers. > > -- > Nathan Vidican > nvidican@wmptl.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 17:02:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id CDC8B16A407; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20061215170200.CDC8B16A407@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: How to get best results from FreeBSD-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:02:00 -0000 How to get the best results from FreeBSD questions. =================================================== Last update $Date: 2005/08/10 02:21:44 $ This is a regular posting to the FreeBSD questions mailing list. If you got it in answer to a message you sent, it means that the sender thinks that at least one of the following things was wrong with your message: - You left out a subject line, or the subject line was not appropriate. - You formatted it in such a way that it was difficult to read. - You asked more than one unrelated question in one message. - You sent out a message with an incorrect date, time or time zone. - You sent out the same message more than once. - You sent an 'unsubscribe' message to FreeBSD-questions. If you have done any of these things, there is a good chance that you will get more than one copy of this message from different people. Read on, and your next message will be more successful. This document is also available on the web at http://www.lemis.com/questions.html. ===================================================================== Contents: I: Introduction II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? IV: How to submit a question to FreeBSD-questions V: How to answer a question to FreeBSD-questions I: Introduction =============== This is a regular posting aimed to help both those seeking advice from FreeBSD-questions (the "newcomers"), and also those who answer the questions (the "hackers"). Note that the term "hacker" has nothing to do with breaking into other people's computers. The correct term for the latter activity is "cracker", but the popular press hasn't found out yet. The FreeBSD hackers disapprove strongly of cracking security, and have nothing to do with it. In the past, there has been some friction which stems from the different viewpoints of the two groups. The newcomers accused the hackers of being arrogant, stuck-up, and unhelpful, while the hackers accused the newcomers of being stupid, unable to read plain English, and expecting everything to be handed to them on a silver platter. Of course, there's an element of truth in both these claims, but for the most part these viewpoints come from a sense of frustration. In this document, I'd like to do something to relieve this frustration and help everybody get better results from FreeBSD-questions. In the following section, I recommend how to submit a question; after that, we'll look at how to answer one. II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions ============================================== When you subscribed to FreeBSD-questions, you got a welcome message from freebsd-questions-request@FreeBSD.ORG. In this message, amongst other things, it told you how to unsubscribe. Here's a typical message: Welcome to the freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list! If you ever want to unsubscribe or change your options (eg, switch to or from digest mode, change your password, etc.), visit your subscription page at: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions/me@me.org (obviously, substitute your mail address for "me@me.org"). You can also make such adjustments via email by sending a message to: freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org with the word 'help' in the subject or body (don't include the quotes), and you will get back a message with instructions. You must know your password to change your options (including changing the password, itself) or to unsubscribe. Normally, Mailman will remind you of your freebsd.org mailing list passwords once every month, although you can disable this if you prefer. This reminder will also include instructions on how to unsubscribe or change your account options. There is also a button on your options page that will email your current password to you. Here's the general information for the list you've subscribed to, in case you don't already have it: FREEBSD-QUESTIONS User questions This is the mailing list for questions about FreeBSD. You should not send "how to" questions to the technical lists unless you consider the question to be pretty technical. Normally, unsubscribing is even simpler than the message suggests: you don't need to specify your mail ID unless it is different from the one which you specified when you subscribed. If Majordomo replies and tells you (incorrectly) that you're not on the list, this may mean one of two things: 1. You have changed your mail ID since you subscribed. That's where keeping the original message from majordomo comes in handy. For example, the sample message above shows my mail ID as grog@lemis.de. Since then, I have changed it to grog@lemis.com. If I were to try to remove grog@lemis.com from the list, it would fail: I would have to specify the name with which I joined. 2. You're subscribed to a mailing list which is subscribed to FreeBSD-questions. If that's the case, you'll have to figure out which one it is and get your name taken off that one. If you're not sure which one it might be, check the headers of the messages you receive from freebsd-questions: maybe there's a clue there. If you've done all this, and you still can't figure out what's going on, send a message to Postmaster@FreeBSD.org, and he will sort things out for you. Don't send a message to FreeBSD-questions: they can't help you. III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? ========================================= Two mailing lists handle general questions about FreeBSD, FreeBSD-questions and FreeBSD-hackers. In some cases, it's not really clear which group you should ask. The following criteria should help for 99% of all questions, however: If the question is of a general nature, first check whether this isn't a Frequently Asked Question (FAQ). There's a list of these questions at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/index.html, and also on your own system (once you've installed it) at /usr/share/doc/en/books/faq/index.html. Check there, and if you don't find an answer, ask FreeBSD-questions. Examples might be questions about installing FreeBSD or the use of a particular UNIX utility. If you think the question relates to a bug, but you're not sure, or you don't know how to look for it, send the message to FreeBSD-questions. If the question relates to a bug, and you're almost sure that it's a bug (for example, you can pinpoint the place in the code where it happens, and you maybe have a fix), then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. You should also enter a problem report with the send-pr utility. If the question relates to enhancements to FreeBSD, and you can make suggestions about how to implement them, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. If the question is of particularly technical nature, such as implementation details or suggestions for improvements, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. There are also a number of other specialized mailing lists, for example FreeBSD-isp, which caters to the interests of ISPs (Internet Service Providers) who run FreeBSD. If you happen to be an ISP, this doesn't mean you should automatically send your questions to FreeBSD-isp. The criteria above still apply, and it's in your interest to stick to them, since you're more likely to get good results that way. IV: How to submit a question ============================= When submitting a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider the following points: 1. Remember that nobody gets paid for answering a FreeBSD question. They do it of their own free will. You can influence this free will positively by submitting a well-formulated question supplying as much relevant information as possible. You can influence this free will negatively by submitting an incomplete, illegible, or rude question. It's perfectly possible to send a message to FreeBSD-questions and not get an answer even if you follow these rules. It's much more possible to not get an answer if you don't. In the rest of this document, we'll look at how to get the most out of your question to FreeBSD-questions. 2. Not everybody who answers FreeBSD questions reads every message: they look at the subject line and decide whether it interests them. Clearly, it's in your interest to specify a subject. ``FreeBSD problem'' or ``Help'' aren't enough. If you provide no subject at all, many people won't bother reading it. If your subject isn't specific enough, the people who can answer it may not read it. 3. When sending a new message, well, send a new message. Don't reply to some other message, erase the old content and change the subject line. That leaves an In-reply-to: header which many mail readers use to thread messages, so your message shows up as a reply to some other message. People often delete messages a whole thread at a time, so apart from irritating people, you also run a chance of having the message deleted unread. 4. Format your message so that it is legible, and PLEASE DON'T SHOUT!!!!!. We appreciate that a lot of people don't speak English as their first language, and we try to make allowances for that, but it's really painful to try to read a message written full of typos or without any line breaks. A lot of badly formatted messages come from bad mailers or badly configured mailers. The following mailers are known to send out badly formatted messages without you finding out about them: Eudora exmh Microsoft Exchange Microsoft Internet Mail Microsoft Outlook Netscape As you can see, the mailers in the Microsoft world are frequent offenders. If at all possible, use a UNIX mailer. If you must use a mailer under Microsoft environments, make sure it is set up correctly. Try not to use MIME: a lot of people use mailers which don't get on very well with MIME. For further information on this subject, check out http://www.lemis.com/email.html. 5. Make sure your time and time zone are set correctly. This may seem a little silly, since your message still gets there, but many of the people you are trying to reach get several hundred messages a day. They frequently sort the incoming messages by subject and by date, and if your message doesn't come before the first answer, they may assume they missed it and not bother to look. 6. Don't include unrelated questions in the same message. Firstly, a long message tends to scare people off, and secondly, it's more difficult to get all the people who can answer all the questions to read the message. 7. Specify as much information as possible. This is a difficult area, and we need to expand on what information you need to submit, but here's a start: If you get error messages, don't say ``I get error messages'', say (for example) ``I get the error message 'No route to host'''. If your system panics, don't say ``My system panicked'', say (for example) ``my system panicked with the message 'free vnode isn't'''. If you have difficulty installing FreeBSD, please tell us what hardware you have. In particular, it's important to know the IRQs and I/O addresses of the boards installed in your machine. If you have difficulty getting PPP to run, describe the configuration. Which version of PPP do you use? What kind of authentication do you have? Do you have a static or dynamic IP address? What kind of messages do you get in the log file? 8. If you don't get an answer immediately, or if you don't even see your own message appear on the list immediately, don't resend the message. Wait at least 24 hours. The FreeBSD mailer offloads messages to a number of subordinate mailers around the world, and sometimes it can take several hours for the mail to get through. And once it gets through, the one person who might know the answer will probably just have gone to bed in his part of the world. 9. If you do all this, and you still don't get an answer, there could be other reasons. For example, the problem is so complicated that nobody knows the answer, or the person who does know the answer was offline. If you don't get an answer after, say, a week, it might help to re-send the message. If you don't get an answer to your second message, though, you're probably not going to get one from this forum. Resending the same message again and again will only make you unpopular. To summarize, let's assume you know the answer to the following question (yes, it's the same one in each case :-). You choose which of these two questions you would be more prepared to answer: Message 1: Subject: (none) I just can't get hits damn silly FereBSD system to workd, and Im really good at this tsuff, but I have never seen anythign sho difficult to install, it jst wont work whatever I try so why don't y9ou guys tell me what I doing wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message 2: Subject: Problems installing FreeBSD I've just got the FreeBSD 2.1.5 CD-ROM from Walnut Creek, and I'm having a lot of difficulty installing it. I have a 66 MHz 486 with 16 MB of memory and an Adaptec 1540A SCSI board, a 1.2GB Quantum Fireball disk and a Toshiba 3501XA CD-ROM drive. The installation works just fine, but when I try to reboot the system, I get the message "Missing Operating System". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- V: How to follow up to a question ================================= Often you will want to send in additional information to a question you have already sent. The best way to do this is to reply to your original message. This has three advantages: 1. You include the original message text, so people will know what you're talking about. Don't forget to trim unnecessary text out, though. 2. The text in the subject line stays the same (you did remember to put one in, didn't you?). Many mailers will sort messages by subject. This helps group messages together. 3. The message reference numbers in the header will refer to the previous message. Some mailers, such as mutt, can thread messages, showing the exact relationships between the messages. VI: How to answer a question ============================ Before you answer a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider: 1. A lot of the points on submitting questions also apply to answering questions. Read them. 2. Has somebody already answered the question? The easiest way to check this is to sort your incoming mail by subject: then (hopefully) you'll see the question followed by any answers, all together. If somebody has already answered it, it doesn't automatically mean that you shouldn't send another answer. But it makes sense to read all the other answers first. 3. Do you have something to contribute beyond what has already been said? In general, "Yeah, me too" answers don't help much, although there are exceptions, like when somebody is describing a problem he's having, and he doesn't know whether it's his fault or whether there's something wrong with the hardware or software. If you do send a "me too" answer, you should also include any further relevant information. 4. Are you sure you understand the question? Very frequently, the person who asks the question is confused or doesn't express himself very well. Even with the best understanding of the system, it's easy to send a reply which doesn't answer the question. This doesn't help: you'll leave the person who submitted the question more frustrated or confused than ever. If nobody else answers, and you're not too sure either, you can always ask for more information. 5. Are you sure your answer is correct? If not, wait a day or so. If nobody else comes up with a better answer, you can still reply and say, for example, "I don't know if this is correct, but since nobody else has replied, why don't you try replacing your ATAPI CD-ROM with a frog?". 6. Unless there's a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and to FreeBSD-questions. Many people on the FreeBSD-questions are "lurkers": they learn by reading messages sent and replied to by others. If you take a message which is of general interest off the list, you're depriving these people of their information. Be careful with group replies; lots of people send messages with hundreds of CCs. If this is the case, be sure to trim the Cc: lines appropriately. 7. Include relevant text from the original message. Trim it to the minimum, but don't overdo it. It should still be possible for somebody who didn't read the original message to understand what you're talking about. 8. Use some technique to identify which text came from the original message, and which text you add. I personally find that prepending ``> '' to the original message works best. Leaving white space after the ``> '' and leave empty lines between your text and the original text both make the result more readable. 9. Put your response in the correct place (after the text to which it replies). It's very difficult to read a thread of responses where each reply comes before the text to which it replies. 10. Most mailers change the subject line on a reply by prepending a text such as ``Re: ''. If your mailer doesn't do it automatically, you should do it manually. 11. If the submitter didn't abide by format conventions (lines too long, inappropriate subject line), please fix it. In the case of an incorrect subject line (such as ``HELP!!??''), change the subject line to (say) ``Re: Difficulties with sync PPP (was: HELP!!??)''. That way other people trying to follow the thread will have less difficulty following it. In such cases, it's appropriate to say what you did and why you did it, but try not to be rude. If you find you can't answer without being rude, don't answer. If you just want to reply to a message because of its bad format, just reply to the submitter, not to the list. You can just send him this message in reply, if you like. $Id: Howto-ask-questions,v 1.6 2005/08/10 02:21:44 grog Exp $ _______________________________________________ Thanks to Josh Paetzel for updating this document to describe mailman. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 17:02:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id D4BF716A415; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20061215170200.D4BF716A415@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: "The Complete FreeBSD": errata and addenda X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:02:01 -0000 The trouble with books is that you can't update them the way you can a web page or any other online documentation. The result is that most leading edge computer books are out of date almost before they are printed. Unfortunately, The Complete FreeBSD, published by O'Reilly, is no exception. Inevitably, a number of bugs and changes have surfaced. "The Complete FreeBSD" has been through a total of five editions, including its predecessor "Installing and Running FreeBSD". Two of these have been reprinted with corrections. I maintain a series of errata pages. Start at http://www.lemis.com/errata-4.html to find out how to get the errata information. Note also that the book has now been released for free download in PDF form. Instead of downloading the changed pages, you may prefer to download the entire book. See http://www.lemis.com/grog/Documentation/CFBSD/ for more information. Have you found a problem with the book, or maybe something confusing? Please let me know: I'm no longer constantly updating it, but I may be able to help Greg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 17:14:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49FAA16A6BE for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:14:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nino80@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF2C43EB3 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:07:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nino80@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i28so443771wra for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:09:27 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AtT/h99dCPaAIHvv24X42PjZR4UQH2dU6ufHnxnngfcVEjYqfwn/2egDQIqULoZyjhqdgQi6g6LOInS7fOwvKwJ4e7IKHmZBSWjZ2/jLS8FYF6eU8ORfApPuJI95OmRg7T0ifFWbTWMdZwZI+VmIE82uvUjmOZbDensC/JQ53kI= Received: by 10.49.8.1 with SMTP id l1mr2861701nfi.1166202564214; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:09:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.105.11 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:09:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <92bcbda50612150909p63935eq613e24538136856@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:09:24 +0100 From: "n j" To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20061214162215.04e75068@houston.oilfield.slb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <7.0.1.0.2.20061214162215.04e75068@houston.oilfield.slb.com> Cc: Subject: Re: Legato Client for freeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:14:23 -0000 6.0.2 Legato client that used(?) to be in the ports works fine for me on a 6.1 box, while 5.5.2 works fine on my 4.9 box. I'm quite certain we are using current 7.x Legato server. As far as security is concerned, local users are not a problem, while firewall takes care of remote problems. Of course, rsyncing to a Linux box is also a good solution. Or simply get rid of crappy software manufacturer which is not supporting FreeBSD. -- Nino On 12/15/06, D G Teed wrote: > The legato client in ports has been dropped for lack of > maintenance and security issue of the default config. > You can get a 6.0 compatible client by back dating ports. > Current 7.x versions of the legato server will not work with this > old FreeBSD client version, so it may be a dead end. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 17:23:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD3716A642 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:23:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from stargate.alaskaparadise.com (114-103-74-65.gci.net [65.74.103.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED6F43E11 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:19:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: by stargate.alaskaparadise.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 559E045F5; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 08:21:22 -0900 (AKST) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: Alaska Paradise Travel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 08:20:56 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <4582A7D6.6010203@vidican.com> <4582CEBA.5020806@computer.org> In-Reply-To: <4582CEBA.5020806@computer.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1714073.XA4xllHYZo"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200612150821.19338.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Cc: Nathan Vidican , Eric Schuele Subject: Re: Best supported mini-PCI wifi X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:23:33 -0000 --nextPart1714073.XA4xllHYZo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 15 December 2006 07:35, Eric Schuele wrote: > On 12/15/2006 07:49, Nathan Vidican wrote: > > My laptop has the wonderfully under-supported Broadcom wifi card in it. > > While it does work now with ndiswrapper and a few needed patches; it > > still doesn't work very well, to say nothing of natively. > > > > So, what does work? I've checked out the hardware notes for 6.1-R, but > > to no avail really... > > I don't know if its "the best supported" or not. But I'm using an > atheros based card. And it works quite well. > I'll second that, I'm also using an Atheros based card that has native supp= ort=20 with the ath driver (which was just updated BTW). Beech =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart1714073.XA4xllHYZo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFgtmOp5D0B1NlT4URAn/IAJ9NRE08vVBso0akoTpH1DejB+0/EwCdELHv CgBdA7KjDGkBJYpDwXr1oaU= =MhHM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1714073.XA4xllHYZo-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 17:49:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA2A16A40F for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:49:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E49343CA9 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:47:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from doc.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GvHBL-0008M7-9l; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:49:15 +0300 Received: from bsam by ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GvHCT-00057T-FA; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:50:25 +0300 To: brian@levie.freeserve.co.uk References: <380-220061251516345670@M2W012.mail2web.com> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:50:25 +0300 In-Reply-To: <380-220061251516345670@M2W012.mail2web.com> (brian@levie.freeserve.co.uk's message of "Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:34:05 -0500") Message-ID: <89896126@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Failure to compile X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:49:17 -0000 Hello, Brian! On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:34:05 -0500 brian@levie.freeserve.co.uk wrote: > I did not realise FreeBSD had a C compiler, I decided to reformat the > partition and reinstall FreeBSD. It appeared to go well but after exiting > the install I cannot boot it, I get the error message ' Unable to load a > Kernel', what has happened? You did something wrong. ;-) To avoid spending much time I usually install FreeBSD with "minimal" configuration. It takes some 5-10 minutes only. That I reboot the system. If it boots I use sysinstall to add other needed stuff (ports, docs, sources, some initial packages etc.) If the system doesn't boot, well, I spend an other couple of 5-10 minutes to reinstall the OS. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 18:23:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A9516A416 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:23:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99BF343CB8 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:21:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so294063ana for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:22:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=LB4acy+5tQyTgxKQUoWyhVE2C+ZN4heVi5rKhdOMihbU3U1xxQ1wgfUNgI8mPzx+zjRBNWwUdwt0zFp2Hhf/mj7W673/yexEwwn7r8nrP/FzaBsASeKtdp1c0s6zAuZKi6k7EdnwuIe3mPN6hKxgUJ6nEqppMuS1Ly4SMxgDSHg= Received: by 10.78.166.7 with SMTP id o7mr261400hue.1166206970302; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:22:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.161.19 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:22:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7a4a15bd0612151022g11306d8dl9297465f575b491b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:22:49 -0600 From: Tuareg To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20061214010319.GB686@pubbox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061206034909.27125.qmail@web37214.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200612131447.28141.lane@joeandlane.com> <7a4a15bd0612131436j7d289ba8h989ba4400b72a3ad@mail.gmail.com> <200612131657.18164.lane@joeandlane.com> <7a4a15bd0612131522t2942b44bo4412d1e16c6ed2e6@mail.gmail.com> <20061214010319.GB686@pubbox.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:23:18 -0000 On 12/13/06, Armin Arh wrote: > > clearly sendmail is running, but not as a daemon. > It gets called for every single mail by some other process running as > root. > You suspect squid to do so? (unlikely, why should a webcache send > emails...) > Well, then run squid as another user and watch the logs, should > be "from=squiduser" then... Hi Armin! At this moment, I can't change the user for squid, but I'll keep this in mind to make some tests in the future. Thank you for your help. The problem with too much root- processes is, you can't tell which one is > going mad. > > enjoy, > Armin > -- > PUBBOX Postmaster + spam-killer. Free email addresses at > http://pubbox.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 18:37:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436E416A512 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:37:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C394343CA7 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:35:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so295774ana for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:37:30 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=VYhuXVn7vxZ/fQCMOY2N8yfqhNzuyUnn6D6FiDGLSd2Mz4uPJl9+QorWBr38jAgaSWbCK5U8HIo1X076Xr8hxPwGdIRlJ1VLDf8HM1IUsoK6oP0vwdvOEcszYWEcmVnfmETsD4ntXkBk+Xd4i/mfAu3mHZ/JaPX40JTkdgH4q50= Received: by 10.78.151.3 with SMTP id y3mr414581hud.1166207842667; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:37:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.161.19 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:37:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7a4a15bd0612151037r4cc2f602jee110db18bb02e1a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:37:22 -0600 From: Tuareg To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20061213201849.C225.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200612131657.18164.lane@joeandlane.com> <17489c7a0612131526v67d74964xb2136b4515dff29b@mail.gmail.com> <20061213201849.C225.GERARD@seibercom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:37:32 -0000 On 12/13/06, Gerard Seibert wrote: > > > You need to check out this URL: > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mail-changingmta.html Also, Sendmail is invoked from the /etc/defaults/rc.conf file. You over > ride it in the /etc/rc.conf file. In FreeBSD 5.0, > > SENDMAIL_ENABLE="NONE" > > is not the proper way to disable Sendmail. Check out the above URL for > further information. > > -- > Gerard Hello Gerard, We've read this link.... and we have this line in /etc/rc.conf sendmail_enable="NONE" In /etc/defaults/rc.conf these are the lines wich contain "sendmail": mta_start_script="/etc/rc.sendmail" # Settings for /etc/rc.sendmail: sendmail_enable="YES" # Run the sendmail inbound daemon (YES/NO/NONE). # If NONE, don't start any sendmail processes. sendmail_flags="-L sm-mta -bd -q30m" # Flags to sendmail (as a server) sendmail_submit_enable="YES" # Start a localhost-only MTA for mail submission sendmail_submit_flags="-L sm-mta -bd -q30m -ODaemonPortOptions=Addr=localhost" sendmail_outbound_enable="YES" # Dequeue stuck mail (YES/NO). sendmail_outbound_flags="-L sm-queue -q30m" # Flags to sendmail (outbound only) sendmail_msp_queue_enable="YES" # Dequeue stuck clientmqueue mail (YES/NO). sendmail_msp_queue_flags="-L sm-msp-queue -Ac -q30m" # Flags for sendmail_msp_queue daemon. /etc/rc.sendmail doesn't exists. And /etc/rc.conf: ### Network daemon (miscellaneous) & NFS options: ### sendmail_enable="NONE" # Run the sendmail daemon (or NO). cron_enable="YES" # Run the periodic job daemon. portmap_enable="NO" # Run the portmapper service (or NO). usbd_enable="NO" sshd_enable="YES" tcp_drop_synfin="YES" tcp_restrict_rst="YES" syslogd_enable="YES" # Run syslog daemon (or NO). syslogd_flags="-s -s" # Flags to syslogd (if enabled). This is for FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE And at this point, I just get a little more confused with this settings. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 18:45:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E938A16A416 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:45:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zwade@oldpathsbaptistchurch.org) Received: from trinity.vnet-inc.com (matrix.vnet-inc.com [216.129.224.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5486943D45 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:43:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zwade@oldpathsbaptistchurch.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.vnet-inc.com [127.0.0.1]) by trinity.vnet-inc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A1435A43D1A for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:45:00 -0700 (MST) Received: from trinity.vnet-inc.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (matrix.vnet-inc.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 84271-01 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:44:59 -0700 (MST) Received: from [192.168.129.225] (unknown [65.19.244.43]) by trinity.vnet-inc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD83A5A43C1D for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:44:59 -0700 (MST) From: "Z. Wade Hampton" Organization: OPBC To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:09:04 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612151209.04931.zwade@oldpathsbaptistchurch.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at vnet-inc.com Subject: buildkernel error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:45:23 -0000 Hello to all, I have MY_KERNEL in the following location... /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/MY_KERNEL When I run... make buildkernel KERNCONF=MY_KERNEL I get.... ERROR: Missing kernel configuration file(s) (MY_KERNEL). *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. # I'm running 6.1, fresh cvsup to 6.1-RELEASE-p11. Why won't buildkernel find MY_KERNEL? THanks in advance for any help. Z. Wade Hampton Twin Bridges, MT From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 19:14:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DCA816A5E5 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:14:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B3243E41 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:09:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so807088uge for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:11:05 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=N95pIYvAmvo9vjCtENlAZBQSb+xyQjdlUbQEFfrKfw85jhxzXEx3W8D3ikBcP11HOBWqw3wKCyEWjQX+vfeZNHEg4emNfK5DosmN3Duw6+qbQ9UQ10CGQ0P7eDAvfUvrYo4GqVcnOQTtQeGTrTpMLXtF/GmNOU2zUyAMT2pypQ0= Received: by 10.78.201.2 with SMTP id y2mr290701huf.1166209831282; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:10:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.161.19 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:10:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7a4a15bd0612151110n6fa86ba8hbe227f9a29d3e265@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:10:30 -0600 From: Tuareg To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200612132251.36352.lane@joeandlane.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061206034909.27125.qmail@web37214.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <7a4a15bd0612131522t2942b44bo4412d1e16c6ed2e6@mail.gmail.com> <200612131733.32763.lane@joeandlane.com> <200612132251.36352.lane@joeandlane.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:14:48 -0000 On 12/13/06, Lane wrote: > > Tuareg, > > I can't find the name of the quy who straightened me out on the fuction of > squid, but kudo's to him. > > Clearly squid is not the culprit. > > But I've done some eyeballing on /usr/sbin/periodic, and I think maybe it > is > the culprit. > > First lets have a look at your /etc/crontab file. Specifically we are > interested in the lines which contain the term "periodic" cat /etc/crontab | grep periodic #1 3 * * * root periodic daily #15 4 * * 6 root periodic weekly #30 5 1 * * root periodic monthly All the lines are commented. If these lines include parameters, which are passed to /usr/sbin/periodic, > then they may be the reason for your periodic emails being sent WITHOUT > sendmail being enabled by the normal boot process. > > Take a look at /usr/sbin/periodic. Note that it uses values > in /etc/defaults/periodic.conf as well as any override variables > in /etc/rc.conf. It could also be overridden in other ways such as by > defining the value "source_periodic_confs_defined" and > "periodic_conf_files" > but this should have already showed up in /etc/rc.conf. > > While you are examining /usr/sbin/periodic, look for the term "output" > In my copy of that script there is a comment that looks like: > > #Where's our output going? > > Then there is a "case" block: > > case "$output" in > /*) pipe="cat >>$output";; > "") pipe=cat;; > *) pipe="mail -s '$host ${arg##*/} run output' $output";; > esac > > If your predecessor had modified this script or, perhaps overridden it > using /etc/defaults/periodic.conf, then he may have either changed the *) > default case, or supplied parameters from /etc/crontab > (or /etc/defaults/periodic.conf) which could invoke sendmail directly. If > he > used override variables, then he would probably also have added a case for > ) > pipe="sendmail - " > > This would account for sendmail being completely disabled in /etc/rc.conf > AND > for the messages being sent out via sendmail. However, as I read it, the > behaviour you have reported would only occur if /usr/sbin/periodic was > actually modified, as the use of the "$output" variables does NOT seem to > allow for invocation of sendmail directly. And I don't believe that > "mail" > can force invocation of sendmail (although I may be wrong, as the man page > does imply that mail will use any means available to get the message out). > > If this is the case (i.e. if "mail" is invoking sendmail directly) you > could > check it by trying to send mail from the command line on one of the > servers > that actually does what you want it to do. If it works, and if there are > NO > modifications to /usr/sbin/periodic or override defaults > in /etc/defaults/periodic.conf, then it will be safe to assume that > this "feature" has been properly quashed in 6.x. You would then need to > follow the procedures for setting up sendmail for outgoing-only, as many > have > already recommended. Well this is the output of: cat /usr/sbin/periodic | grep output tmp_output=`mktemp ${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/periodic.XXXXXXXXXX` # Where's our output going ? eval output=\$${arg##*/}_output case "$output" in /*) pipe="cat >>$output";; *) pipe="mail -s '$host ${arg##*/} run output' $output";; output=TRUE $file $tmp_output 2>&1 if [ -s $tmp_output ] 0) [ $success = NO ] && output=FALSE;; 1) [ $info = NO ] && output=FALSE;; 2) [ $badconfig = NO ] && output=FALSE;; [ $output = TRUE ] && { cat $tmp_output; empty=FALSE; } cp /dev/null $tmp_output echo "No output from the $processed file$plural processed" echo "-- End of $arg output --" rm -f $tmp_output But, /etc/defaults/periodic.conf don't appear to be modified, but can't be sure 100% because we don't have other server with a fresh install of FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE to compare. Yes, we are able to send mails from the command line, so.. it could be that this feature was disable for 6.x In any case, the behaviour you desire would only work properly by making the > appropriate changes to /etc/mail/.mc, (i.e. SMART_HOST > and/or HUB settings), and then running "make install" in /etc/mail. (And > this > is always going to be the case where sendmail is concerned) > > I hope this information leads you to a resolution, as it has been a great > learning experience for me ... but my brain hurts :) > > lane > We wanted to ask and check with others before trying with modifications in the files, so I guess that we'll finish doing what the documentation recomends. Thank you for your help, we learned a lot too. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 19:15:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B84316A891 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:15:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E19C4406A for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:11:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so298102ana for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:12:58 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=aE3j3rrx8oWCj6fvkttN/jm17Xvz03hxHQZ/MCac+NIYlN9KQlKyoxUV5RqM59IV+Git6pWftn7XzsiZypasJqSnoqwGVn+qx/5ABEOemlJHexSWnlv9Wct3oYiAHFMp/O3v4MBulTvZiH2JqzoBcU5mizMrSS8k8qAwln4jJWo= Received: by 10.78.185.16 with SMTP id i16mr426617huf.1166209976158; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:12:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.161.19 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:12:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7a4a15bd0612151112t5a9c8929x4294bf5affdcf52e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:12:55 -0600 From: Tuareg To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200612140815.00323.lane@joeandlane.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061214064340.B476016A505@hub.freebsd.org> <20061214080822.GA14597@ns.umpquanet.com> <200612140815.00323.lane@joeandlane.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:15:30 -0000 On 12/14/06, Lane wrote: > > > > > This is quite the WAG here, but can sendmail be started on-demand > > from inetd.conf? > It may be a WAG, but it may explain all of what is going on. "mail" would > attempt to create a connection to localhost, inetd would start sendmail to > accept the connection, sendmail would route the message and then die. > > Tuareg, check out /etc/inetd.conf for an entry containing the word > "sendmail" Nothing, inetd.conf doesn't have any lines with the word "sendmail" :( And let us know what you find. > > lane > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 19:15:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95AC216A536 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:15:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from smtp.utwente.nl (smtp2.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51838440F7 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:12:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from nox.student.utwente.nl (nox.student.utwente.nl [130.89.165.91]) by smtp.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id kBFJDqox028866; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:13:52 +0100 From: Pieter de Goeje To: "J. W. Ballantine" Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:13:52 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200612151256.HAA19104@hera.homer.att.com> In-Reply-To: <200612151256.HAA19104@hera.homer.att.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612152013.52207.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: system bootup console setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:15:35 -0000 On Friday 15 December 2006 13:56, J. W. Ballantine wrote: > Pieter, > > Thanks for the response, but I may have asked the wrong question. You're welcome :) > > I have two systems running 6-STABLE, one on a desktop pc and one > on a laptop. Both have saver="logo" in rc.conf, but the laptop > fails to load it: > logo_saver: the console does not support M_VGA_CG320 > Module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (logo_saver, 0xc266aac8, 0) error 19 You could try adding 'options VESA' to your kernel config. I think 'kldload vesa' will also work. logo_saver should then use mode M_VESA_CG800x600 instead of M_VGA_CG320. - Pieter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 19:15:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 408E516A5E9 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:15:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delta@talon.net) Received: from pelican.talon.net (pelican.talon.net [67.43.0.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A80443CB9 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:14:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from delta@talon.net) Received: from [198.180.69.190] (c-68-82-98-40.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [68.82.98.40]) by pelican.talon.net (Mail Daemon) with ESMTP id 8DA789C21E for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:15:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4582F45B.90105@talon.net> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:15:39 -0500 From: warren schreiner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: stand/sysinstall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:15:58 -0000 have just installed 6.1 and need to setup the network connection i isually use /stand/sysinstall but i get "command not found". So I down loaded the documentation and it says to use the sysinstall. So, sysinstall has changed and if so why was it not changed in the doc files. what files need to be changed in etc to get out to the real world through a firewalled gateway? thanks warren From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 19:17:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9180816A751 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:17:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF21D43CAC for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:15:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so298423ana for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:17:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=df3MUSglv6qQSatn6I6zbGU9VE2E2w5/MNI/V98029HLRNXDYVZpbNXZ6X7bHDTK6wL5fV2zUZB2K7lI9bzcMdWDEvBxFTVAYUKH/IZTnof6vjSB3VNQFVsr8b3Ak1YPg53wuuxrJhSYhzxtwW7aJQw3633vwlA2zgUJ69OWQPI= Received: by 10.78.123.4 with SMTP id v4mr45241huc.1166210217491; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:16:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.161.19 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:16:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7a4a15bd0612151116k4e1151f0obdcfbc67b7af344d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:16:57 -0600 From: Tuareg To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20061214145926.GA98067@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061206034909.27125.qmail@web37214.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <7a4a15bd0612131522t2942b44bo4412d1e16c6ed2e6@mail.gmail.com> <200612131733.32763.lane@joeandlane.com> <200612132251.36352.lane@joeandlane.com> <20061214145926.GA98067@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:17:04 -0000 On 12/14/06, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > > I haven't followed this whole thread so I may be jumping in to the > wrong place, but... > Somewhere it is documented - I have read it - that various utilities > such as mail invoke single instances of sendmail to transfer their > _outgoing only_ messages. I think, in those cases, sendmail clears > the mail queue before going away. They do not start sendmail as a > daemon or to receive email. > > Probably some searching will find that documentation. > > ////jerry > > Hello Jerry, maybe you read about ssmtp? http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/outgoing-only.html But no, this tool it's not installed. Thank you for your help anyway. :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 19:21:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10FBF16A47C for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:21:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE1543D4C for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:18:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so808820uge for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:19:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=sX6/b3e/XbVlk/C3f7NiQVtG/jmEpyUpquy898NKOVT2al1ZkUxRfQw5L39xdm4UEjSYa4SEeG7Sxr9f5mgkMU4lsPvZileVPYA/3EO49aEJjw8+Z5Y6SM55REbxjwhB6AMG4FMHith33PrV50Xw6U2KX2+BXxle8I3lvDJ7Sqs= Received: by 10.78.39.16 with SMTP id m16mr295727hum.1166210355541; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:19:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.161.19 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:19:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7a4a15bd0612151119x55eb1e77m794d5b533f5231db@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:19:15 -0600 From: Tuareg To: "Jerry McAllister" In-Reply-To: <20061214151354.GB98067@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061214064340.B476016A505@hub.freebsd.org> <20061214080822.GA14597@ns.umpquanet.com> <20061214151354.GB98067@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: James Long , lane@joeandlane.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:21:14 -0000 On 12/14/06, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 12:08:23AM -0800, James Long wrote: > > > > Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:33:32 -0600 > > > From: Lane > > > Subject: Re: how do I see security logs without turning on sendmail? > > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > > Message-ID: <200612131733.32763.lane@joeandlane.com> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > > > > Tuareg, > > > > > > clearly sendmail is running. That is indicated by "sendmail[41626]" > in > > > your /var/log/sendmail log. > > > > > > The question, of course, is how does it get started. > > > > This is quite the WAG here, but can sendmail be started on-demand > > from inetd.conf? > > It probably could, but I don't think that is the way it is done normally. > Take a look in /etc/defaults/rc.conf at the stuff for sendmail > and then note what overrides you have put in /etc/rc.conf > Also, check out /etc/rc.sendmail > > ////jerry I sent this before, but here we go again: In /etc/defaults/rc.conf these are the lines wich contain "sendmail": mta_start_script="/etc/rc.sendmail" # Settings for /etc/rc.sendmail: sendmail_enable="YES" # Run the sendmail inbound daemon (YES/NO/NONE). # If NONE, don't start any sendmail processes. sendmail_flags="-L sm-mta -bd -q30m" # Flags to sendmail (as a server) sendmail_submit_enable="YES" # Start a localhost-only MTA for mail submission sendmail_submit_flags="-L sm-mta -bd -q30m -ODaemonPortOptions=Addr=localhost" sendmail_outbound_enable="YES" # Dequeue stuck mail (YES/NO). sendmail_outbound_flags="-L sm-queue -q30m" # Flags to sendmail (outbound only) sendmail_msp_queue_enable="YES" # Dequeue stuck clientmqueue mail (YES/NO). sendmail_msp_queue_flags="-L sm-msp-queue -Ac -q30m" # Flags for sendmail_msp_queue daemon. /etc/rc.sendmail doesn't exists. And /etc/rc.conf: ### Network daemon (miscellaneous) & NFS options: ### sendmail_enable="NONE" # Run the sendmail daemon (or NO). cron_enable="YES" # Run the periodic job daemon. portmap_enable="NO" # Run the portmapper service (or NO). usbd_enable="NO" sshd_enable="YES" tcp_drop_synfin="YES" tcp_restrict_rst="YES" syslogd_enable="YES" # Run syslog daemon (or NO). syslogd_flags="-s -s" # Flags to syslogd (if enabled). This is for FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 19:25:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E3916A416 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:25:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from stargate.alaskaparadise.com (114-103-74-65.gci.net [65.74.103.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 565A543CBC for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:23:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stargate.alaskaparadise.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3947457A for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:24:27 -0900 (AKST) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: Alaska Paradise Travel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:24:10 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1320771.fuQsakNQti"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200612151024.25648.freebsd@alaskaparadise.com> Subject: iconv.h not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:25:27 -0000 --nextPart1320771.fuQsakNQti Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I'm trying to upgrade a port that needs iconv.h but autoconf comes back wit= h=20 this: checking iconv.h usability... no checking iconv.h presence... no iconv.h is in /usr/local/include/iconv.h How do I go about fixing this? Beech =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart1320771.fuQsakNQti Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFgvZpR5sEeCt9j00RAky+AJ9kp0ROBv9zU3jxvUxb2MpLpVxlugCaAgdF lhn+CaGTEKIhoAMbIItTafw= =27PL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1320771.fuQsakNQti-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 19:57:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E42916A503 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:57:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from relay0.av-mx.com (relay0.av-mx.com [137.118.16.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1079643CB1 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:55:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) X-Virus-Scan-Time: 0 Received: from [137.118.16.61] (HELO mx0.av-mx.com) by relay0.av-mx.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with SMTP id 516761446 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:56:56 -0500 Received: (qmail 30289 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2006 19:56:56 -0000 Received: from dsl3191.ywave.com (HELO ?192.168.1.66?) (micahjon@ywave.com@12.178.96.191) by 0 with SMTP; 15 Dec 2006 19:56:56 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 12.178.96.191 X-CLIENT-HOST: dsl3191.ywave.com Message-ID: <4582FE08.40501@ywave.com> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:56:56 -0800 From: Micah User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061205) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dick hoogendijk References: <20061213231719.GY873@routeduvel.rembrandtkd.welmers.net> <45809593.5000902@chillt.de> <20061214001809.GZ873@routeduvel.rembrandtkd.welmers.net> <20061215113505.GA96570@lothlorien.nagual.nl> In-Reply-To: <20061215113505.GA96570@lothlorien.nagual.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] gamin/fam issues with KDE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:57:08 -0000 dick hoogendijk wrote: > On 14 Dec Bastiaan Welmers wrote: > >> One nasty thing is that when afterwards installing a package requiring >> gamin, it will fail with errors. To prevent this you could just "fake" >> the pkg db that gamin is installed however actually fam libraries are >> installed. > > And how exactly is this "faking" done? I'm no fan of gamin too and if > possible I compiled my programs for fam. But this sounds nice ;-) > Not sure what the original poster was refering to, but I just put WITH_FAM_SYSTEM=fam in my /etc/make.conf back when they first started changing ports over to gamin, and have not had any problems since. HTH, Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 20:19:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C3816A412 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:19:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1523A43CB4 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:17:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so460884nzh for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:18:58 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=JK+rCKY/OTKZgQsNASi9KdMwqftkuNMZDMwqo4UbHCasdfMJsiOT9wcil4SV/vLJttpcvldPRR1ygk2xyggFmN+s9DkVonpf/8B+zeOAoZHEPqKzW4WIBOiqkXhDAhe6ZzbQb8tUEBIRUiBa1UWHItBE0YFt/kA/eVL3RLSRPyE= Received: by 10.64.131.4 with SMTP id e4mr1560851qbd.1166213934669; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:18:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.75.14 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:18:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <17489c7a0612151218q2ec314f8xe36260e8ed1a0178@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:18:54 -0500 From: "Chad Gross" To: "warren schreiner" In-Reply-To: <4582F45B.90105@talon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4582F45B.90105@talon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: stand/sysinstall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:19:07 -0000 On 12/15/06, warren schreiner wrote: > > have just installed 6.1 and need to setup the network connection i > isually use /stand/sysinstall > but i get "command not found". So I down loaded the documentation and > it says to use the sysinstall. So, sysinstall has changed and if so > why was it not changed in the doc files. > > what files need to be changed in etc to get out to the real world > through a firewalled gateway? > > thanks > > warren > _______________________________________________ man rc.conf If you use DHCP it will be ifconfig_DRIVER=dhcp, otherwise you will have to set the IP and Netmask manually along with the default gateway. Chad From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 20:27:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E4B16A47C for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:27:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brian@levie.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from xsmtp01.mail2web.com (xsmtp01.mail2web.com [168.144.250.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2217643CB6 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:26:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brian@levie.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from [168.144.108.17] (helo=M2W017.mail2web.com) by xsmtp01.mail2web.com with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GvJei-0002CD-U3; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:27:50 -0500 Message-ID: <380-2200612515202744924@M2W017.mail2web.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Originating-IP: 84.71.58.250 X-URL: http://mail2web.com/ From: "brian@levie.freeserve.co.uk" To: bsam@ipt.ru Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:27:44 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: *** SPAM *** Re: Failure to compile X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: brian@levie.freeserve.co.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:27:51 -0000 Original Message: ----------------- From: Boris Samorodov bsam@ipt=2Eru Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:50:25 +0300 To: brian@levie=2Efreeserve=2Eco=2Euk, freeBSD-questions@FreeBSD=2Eorg Subject: *** SPAM *** Re: Failure to compile Hello, Brian! On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:34:05 -0500 brian@levie=2Efreeserve=2Eco=2Euk wrote= : > I did not realise FreeBSD had a C compiler, I decided to reformat the > partition and reinstall FreeBSD=2E It appeared to go well but after exi= ting > the install I cannot boot it, I get the error message ' Unable to load a= > Kernel', what has happened=3F You did something wrong=2E ;-) To avoid spending much time I usually install FreeBSD with "minimal" configuration=2E It takes some 5-10 minutes only=2E That I reboot the system=2E If it boots I use sysinstall to add other needed stuff (ports, docs, sources, some initial packages etc=2E) If the system doesn't boot, well, I spend an other couple of 5-10 minutes to reinstall the OS=2E WBR --=20 Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www=2Eipt=2Eru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www=2EFreeBSD=2Eorg The Power To Serve Many thanks for your reply, I installed as you suggested and everything works fine! Cannot understand why=2E Even cc (not now the Xenix version != )=2E Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web=2Ecom/ =2E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 21:03:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E19816A4C2 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:03:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8765343CC9 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:01:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBFL0YTU006433; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:00:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kBFL0YhO006432; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:00:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:00:34 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Chad Gross Message-ID: <20061215210034.GA6393@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <4582F45B.90105@talon.net> <17489c7a0612151218q2ec314f8xe36260e8ed1a0178@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17489c7a0612151218q2ec314f8xe36260e8ed1a0178@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: warren schreiner , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: stand/sysinstall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:03:39 -0000 On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 03:18:54PM -0500, Chad Gross wrote: > On 12/15/06, warren schreiner wrote: > > > >have just installed 6.1 and need to setup the network connection i > >isually use /stand/sysinstall > >but i get "command not found". So I down loaded the documentation and > >it says to use the sysinstall. So, sysinstall has changed and if so > >why was it not changed in the doc files. It has been moved to: /usr/sbin/sysinstall I believe I read it in documentation somewhere - probablyl version notes, but maybe it did not make it do every place it is mentioned. ////jerry > > > >thanks > > > >warren > >_______________________________________________ > > > > man rc.conf > > If you use DHCP it will be ifconfig_DRIVER=dhcp, otherwise you will have to > set the IP and Netmask manually along with the default gateway. > > Chad > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 21:18:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B03816A40F for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:18:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B0C43CC4 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:17:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBFLFrQd006517; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:15:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kBFLFreD006516; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:15:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:15:53 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: warren schreiner Message-ID: <20061215211553.GA6490@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <4582F45B.90105@talon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4582F45B.90105@talon.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: stand/sysinstall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:18:57 -0000 On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 02:15:39PM -0500, warren schreiner wrote: > have just installed 6.1 and need to setup the network connection i > isually use /stand/sysinstall > but i get "command not found". So I down loaded the documentation and > it says to use the sysinstall. So, sysinstall has changed and if so > why was it not changed in the doc files. That has been moved to: /usr/sbin/sysinstall I read about the move in documentation somewhere, probably release notes. ////jerry > > what files need to be changed in etc to get out to the real world > through a firewalled gateway? > > thanks > > warren > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 21:38:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F1016A49E for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:38:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bkudria@eml.cc) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0D243D60 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:35:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkudria@eml.cc) Received: from out1.internal (unknown [10.202.2.149]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44AD952CFB for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:36:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by out1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:36:07 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: uA7auTPRC3yGHKQx1j2Xtw25yTQ+IkCYd4Lv8hba1P2y 1166218567 Received: from laotzu.local (gy212-248.resnet.stonybrook.edu [130.245.212.248]) by www.fastmail.fm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3B0EF28 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:36:06 -0500 (EST) From: Benjamin Kudria To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:36:12 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612151636.12927.bkudria@eml.cc> Subject: Installing PHP5 alongside PHP4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:38:52 -0000 Hi, I admin a small web hosting server running 6.1-RELEASE-p10, and I have PHP4 working as a module with Apache 2.0.59. I have a PHP app that doesn't work with PHP4 and requires PHP5, along with the mysql and gd extensions. Is there a way to get PHP5 to run alongside PHP4 short of installing another Apache in a jail? Thanks, Benjamin Kudria From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 22:03:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2DC16A417 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:03:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grant@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756DB43CC6 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:01:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael.grant@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i28so502127wra for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:03:33 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=d+NwAPeY199GgP5++xPYNMfwwAnxM5FCRhm5mLZnRA3FvHrnXsjJSan5W/jz0sOaVx4lL3owOsbbpkfs5t1tkpUfqh7bghykIslcjk3Gwt+Rgy99ox6QMHO51VDG6cjtCF/U68nI9wOcti1QnA46CUcj2F0xJU/xit2UaPYBals= Received: by 10.82.113.6 with SMTP id l6mr124544buc.1166220210854; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:03:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.134.11 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:03:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <62b856460612151403l3839c75fj6c3248919a2784ce@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:03:30 +0100 From: "Michael Grant" Sender: michael.grant@gmail.com To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3e813c73eb055652 Subject: compiling a port unstripped for debugging X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:03:41 -0000 Can someone please tell me if there is an easy way to compile and install a port without stripping it (i.e. compiling it with -g and not running strip when it's installed)? Michael Grant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 22:40:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2897716A4D4 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:40:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB2F43CA9 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:38:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GvLip-0006Kr-Pk for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:40:07 -0500 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost.localnet.local [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kBFMgabw087333 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:42:36 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id kBFMgZ2w087332 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:42:35 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:42:35 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612151642.35712.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec7964c5856f03301c89a17c37d4171a11ba350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Route spagetti X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:40:16 -0000 Hello, I have a routing problem ... I think. I have an established OpenVPN hosted on FreeBSD 6.1 using tun0 configured for 10.11.13.x. The OpenVPN configuration currently uses the "client-to-client" directive so that vpn Windows clients could access a separate central proprietary (Windows) database (also on the vpn). Response time and security have prompted me to investigate the use of qemu, hosted on FreeBSD, to house the proprietary database. I configured the qemu Windows image on my development machine and configured it to use tap0 10.11.12.150->10.11.12.151. The Windows side of the interface is 10.11.12.151 and FreeBSD keeps 10.11.12.150. I have used netmask 255.255.255.0 and 255.255.255.252 with no discernible change in behaviour (which I'm getting to). Everything worked correctly in development - I could establish a Terminal Services session with the Windows client and do whatever I needed to do, including access the internet from the qemu-hosted session. However when I pushed the image out to the vpn server, I found something odd: When logged into the remote qemu-hosted Windows session via Terminal services, I can ping any interface on the vpn host (10.11.12.150, 10.11.13.1, and defaultrouter). I can also ping any client connected to the vpn tun device (10.11.13.X). However I cannot route from the Windows session to the public internet. Typically there is a tight firewall in place on the vpn host, but I have disabled the firewall rules and stil been unable to access the public internet from within the qemu-hosted session, while I *am* able to access the internet from a shell on the vpn host. Is this necessarily a job for natd? Or is there some simpler way to get 10.11.12.150 to forward 10.11.13.x packets to tun0 and all others to the defaultrouter on the host machine? I'm looking at "ipfw add forward ..." but it does not look promising. Thanks for your time. I know I can be long-winded. lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 22:41:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEFC616A415 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:41:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from relay1.av-mx.com (relay1.av-mx.com [137.118.16.126]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0957B43CC6 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:39:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) X-Virus-Scan-Time: 0 Received: from [137.118.16.61] (HELO mx0.av-mx.com) by relay1.av-mx.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with SMTP id 511622351 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:41:20 -0500 Received: (qmail 4384 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2006 22:41:19 -0000 Received: from dsl10204.ywave.com (HELO ?192.168.1.66?) (micahjon@ywave.com@12.178.97.204) by 0 with SMTP; 15 Dec 2006 22:41:19 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 12.178.97.204 X-CLIENT-HOST: dsl10204.ywave.com Message-ID: <4583248F.8020300@ywave.com> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:41:19 -0800 From: Micah User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061205) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Grant References: <62b856460612151403l3839c75fj6c3248919a2784ce@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <62b856460612151403l3839c75fj6c3248919a2784ce@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: compiling a port unstripped for debugging X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:41:33 -0000 Michael Grant wrote: > Can someone please tell me if there is an easy way to compile and > install a port without stripping it (i.e. compiling it with -g and not > running strip when it's installed)? > > Michael Grant I have the following conditionally defined in my /etc/make.conf CFLAGS= -g -O -pipe STRIP= And that seems to work. Defining those on the command line would probably work as well. HTH, Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 22:49:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C775716A632 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:49:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu (server.t-hosting.hu [217.20.133.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC69043CED for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:46:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A669ACB70; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:48:05 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at t-hosting.hu Received: from server.t-hosting.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.t-hosting.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id SwOtjnk36ZCu; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:48:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.2.186] (catv-50635cb6.catv.broadband.hu [80.99.92.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0329ACB6C; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:48:01 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4583261A.9000103@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:47:54 +0100 From: Gabor Kovesdan User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Grant References: <62b856460612151403l3839c75fj6c3248919a2784ce@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <62b856460612151403l3839c75fj6c3248919a2784ce@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: compiling a port unstripped for debugging X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:49:36 -0000 Michael Grant schrieb: > Can someone please tell me if there is an easy way to compile and > install a port without stripping it (i.e. compiling it with -g and not > running strip when it's installed)? > > Michael Grant > You can set STRIP and STRIP_CMD to empty for not stripping the binaries and add -g to CFLAGS. E.g. make STRIP="" STRIP_CMD="" CFLAGS+=-g install This should work for you. You can also place these to /etc/make.conf if you want to use this every time. Cheers, Gabor From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 00:39:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF32E16A40F for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 00:39:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from alnrmhc14.comcast.net (alnrmhc14.comcast.net [204.127.225.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B43DC43CAA for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 00:37:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [192.168.214.215] (cpe-76-184-133-124.tx.res.rr.com[76.184.133.124]) by comcast.net (alnrmhc14) with ESMTP id <20061216003908b1400mk3o0e>; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 00:39:09 +0000 Message-ID: <4583402C.6010903@computer.org> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:39:08 -0600 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061111) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Beech Rintoul References: <200612151024.25648.freebsd@alaskaparadise.com> In-Reply-To: <200612151024.25648.freebsd@alaskaparadise.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iconv.h not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 00:39:12 -0000 On 12/15/2006 13:24, Beech Rintoul wrote: > I'm trying to upgrade a port that needs iconv.h but autoconf comes back with > this: > > checking iconv.h usability... no > checking iconv.h presence... no > > iconv.h is in /usr/local/include/iconv.h > Recently I had a similar issue. Looking in the working folder for the port at the contents of the config.log offered some insight. You can see exactly what its looking for, where and how. Might help. HTH > How do I go about fixing this? > > Beech -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 01:04:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F7F16A412 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:04:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF8943C9D for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:03:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from UTDEVS08.campus.ad.utdallas.edu (utdex08.utdallas.edu [129.110.70.103]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691C1388C2C for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:04:44 -0600 (CST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:04:43 -0600 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=SHA1; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00A9_01C7207B.E1646DB0" Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: cvsup and amd64 Thread-Index: Accf9F0CSo8YyJTXT++jtgasNgNLPQAuWfaQ From: "Schmehl, Paul L" To: Subject: RE: cvsup and amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:04:49 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00A9_01C7207B.E1646DB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Z. Wade Hampton Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 9:18 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: cvsup and amd64 Greetings to all, I'm running a dell 1501 laptop with amd64x2 processor. I got a disk from a guru specifically for this architecture, booted it, and installed 6.1 via FTP. Yesterday I ran cvsup successfully. Today I did "make buildworld" successfully. Now, I have a little paranoia about "buildkernel". Please tell me, did I need to specify anything specifically about the amd64 architecture when running cvsup? Did I possibly get a GENERIC kernel file through cvsup that is not compatible with amd? ********************************************************************** Sorry for the horrible formatting, but for reasons beyond my control, I only have access to Microsoft Outlook right now. It appears no one has answered you yet, so, to alleviate your fears, yes, unless you've changed the kernel in any way (and it sounds like you haven't), a simple make buildkernel and make installkernel should work just fine. Reboot afterwards, and you should be running the new kernel. The only reason you would *need* to make a change would be if you're running dual processors or you need to customize the kernel for performance reasons. Otherwise the GENERIC kernel will suffice. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ ------=_NextPart_000_00A9_01C7207B.E1646DB0 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIISVTCCAwMw ggJsAhEAuS9gzIifoXpGCbhbcGyKrzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADCBwTELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxFzAV BgNVBAoTDlZlcmlTaWduLCBJbmMuMTwwOgYDVQQLEzNDbGFzcyAyIFB1YmxpYyBQcmltYXJ5IENl cnRpZmljYXRpb24gQXV0aG9yaXR5IC0gRzIxOjA4BgNVBAsTMShjKSAxOTk4IFZlcmlTaWduLCBJ bmMuIC0gRm9yIGF1dGhvcml6ZWQgdXNlIG9ubHkxHzAdBgNVBAsTFlZlcmlTaWduIFRydXN0IE5l dHdvcmswHhcNOTgwNTE4MDAwMDAwWhcNMjgwODAxMjM1OTU5WjCBwTELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxFzAV BgNVBAoTDlZlcmlTaWduLCBJbmMuMTwwOgYDVQQLEzNDbGFzcyAyIFB1YmxpYyBQcmltYXJ5IENl cnRpZmljYXRpb24gQXV0aG9yaXR5IC0gRzIxOjA4BgNVBAsTMShjKSAxOTk4IFZlcmlTaWduLCBJ bmMuIC0gRm9yIGF1dGhvcml6ZWQgdXNlIG9ubHkxHzAdBgNVBAsTFlZlcmlTaWduIFRydXN0IE5l dHdvcmswgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAKeIASF0LOcaA/CY4Zc8DyEI8Zzbl+ma /MIEBhO+X1LIzB4sElYsuAFpLMyZH62wlq55BPITOcF7mLoILOjChBMsqmnpCfTHqQKkQsIjT0rY 8A6i+zFsyeZvmScH9eb0THiebetGhvq5hslU8rLEr9RGHFrJFTD/DWz1LQ5tzn93AgMBAAEwDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAci75f9HxcfvEnvbFXlGKQJi4aPibHIPY4p29/+2h5mbqLwn0ytfqpSuV 9iRghk1ELoOlxC2g0654aW9y2myuCPBjkjfmu8QwF613zEk1qs/Yj9G+txiWR3NqVCI0ZC22FptZ W7RRWTqzCxT0Et9noPStMmResUZyJ4wSe8VEtK4wggPYMIIDQaADAgECAhBB7B89pxQHlsT21Qzd 0Q9lMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHBMQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEXMBUGA1UEChMOVmVyaVNpZ24sIElu Yy4xPDA6BgNVBAsTM0NsYXNzIDIgUHVibGljIFByaW1hcnkgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3Jp dHkgLSBHMjE6MDgGA1UECxMxKGMpIDE5OTggVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4gLSBGb3IgYXV0aG9yaXpl ZCB1c2Ugb25seTEfMB0GA1UECxMWVmVyaVNpZ24gVHJ1c3QgTmV0d29yazAeFw05OTAzMzEwMDAw MDBaFw0wOTAzMzAyMzU5NTlaMIHqMScwJQYDVQQKEx5UaGUgVW5pdmVyc2l0eSBvZiBUZXhhcyBT eXN0ZW0xHzAdBgNVBAsTFlZlcmlTaWduIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsxOzA5BgNVBAsTMlRlcm1zIG9m IHVzZSBhdCBodHRwczovL3d3dy52ZXJpc2lnbi5jb20vcnBhIChjKTk5MTIwMAYDVQQLEylDbGFz cyAyIENBIC0gT25TaXRlIEluZGl2aWR1YWwgU3Vic2NyaWJlcjEtMCsGA1UEAxMkVGhlIFVuaXZl cnNpdHkgb2YgVGV4YXMgYXQgRGFsbGFzIENBMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQC/ 6u+H6x4KwQD5IhHB0cHM23ravjbScGAwYOUZ4FMvNfTJqCkF1t49nfMGmmR9vtGHVHib/6J48fuH q8P8h0zCSUEN4cDSpdf8fv9CUU508wHVaHOlXQQx+OYpJWOoI5pEaoGLD7A58e/bRljDurjPS/N6 waJJlYMjQ7qbGo8yhQIDAQABo4GlMIGiMCkGA1UdEQQiMCCkHjAcMRowGAYDVQQDExFQcml2YXRl TGFiZWwxLTE0MDARBglghkgBhvhCAQEEBAMCAQYwRAYDVR0gBD0wOzA5BgtghkgBhvhFAQcBATAq MCgGCCsGAQUFBwIBFhxodHRwczovL3d3dy52ZXJpc2lnbi5jb20vUlBBMA8GA1UdEwQIMAYBAf8C AQAwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgEGMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAFMJtdyytonRIFCDyTh53MgIskm/uFOD b4rMsuR6fPyj6A9fYV5flwSVElrSlQEi8bzt8VS2VKZUGKGdVLwGaQTHAiE3ooI5iKesoJ/ogxld kkg5GlmCJCBDvIaVEtyDdOHm4xO+aqSHADExIwclm6+6LFGRDlmmoxeI0rTOVBccMIIFczCCBNyg AwIBAgIQFv07SZHB6E4UCbzpPizZmjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADCB6jEnMCUGA1UEChMeVGhlIFVu aXZlcnNpdHkgb2YgVGV4YXMgU3lzdGVtMR8wHQYDVQQLExZWZXJpU2lnbiBUcnVzdCBOZXR3b3Jr MTswOQYDVQQLEzJUZXJtcyBvZiB1c2UgYXQgaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cudmVyaXNpZ24uY29tL3JwYSAo Yyk5OTEyMDAGA1UECxMpQ2xhc3MgMiBDQSAtIE9uU2l0ZSBJbmRpdmlkdWFsIFN1YnNjcmliZXIx LTArBgNVBAMTJFRoZSBVbml2ZXJzaXR5IG9mIFRleGFzIGF0IERhbGxhcyBDQTAeFw0wNjA4MzEw MDAwMDBaFw0wNzA4MzEyMzU5NTlaMIH0MScwJQYDVQQKFB5UaGUgVW5pdmVyc2l0eSBvZiBUZXhh cyBTeXN0ZW0xLTArBgNVBAsUJFRoZSBVbml2ZXJzaXR5IG9mIFRleGFzIGF0IERhbGxhcyBDQTFG MEQGA1UECxM9d3d3LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9yZXBvc2l0b3J5L0NQUyBJbmNvcnAuIGJ5IFJlZi4s TElBQi5MVEQoYyk5OTEYMBYGA1UECxQPTWFpbCBTdG9wIC0gVVREMRUwEwYDVQQDEwxQYXVsIFNj aG1laGwxITAfBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWEnBhdWxzQHV0ZGFsbGFzLmVkdTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEF AAOBjQAwgYkCgYEArwGceUsaLLMLdC7KadhzVvJnF/tg3EyRfgvjfETEydQ80yKAq2bscRgqVggZ NFQ7VZZHjbuyI/j+akb36ZnEQ87I8muyr8O00ggs+Z3eTNZOIiE6JMGBjLXg5IzYwKJmn00fzBET 2KHAgTIXHUTlgoQLXYHkmhQV5REUEXmY6lkCAwEAAaOCAgwwggIIMAkGA1UdEwQCMAAwHQYDVR0R BBYwFIEScGF1bHNAdXRkYWxsYXMuZWR1MIIBJAYDVR0gBIIBGzCCARcwggETBgtghkgBhvhFAQcB BjCCAQIwKwYIKwYBBQUHAgEWH2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9ycGEta3IwgdIGCCsG AQUFBwICMIHFGoHCTk9USUNFOiBQcml2YXRlIGtleSBtYXkgYmUgcmVjb3ZlcmVkIGJ5IFZlcmlT aWduJ3MgY3VzdG9tZXIgd2hvIG1heSBiZSBhYmxlIHRvIGRlY3J5cHQgbWVzc2FnZXMgeW91IHNl bmQgdG8gY2VydGlmaWNhdGUgaG9sZGVyLiAgVXNlIGlzIHN1YmplY3QgdG8gdGVybXMgYXQgaHR0 cHM6Ly93d3cudmVyaXNpZ24uY29tL3JwYS1rciAoYyk5OS4wEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgeAMHUG A1UdHwRuMGwwaqBooGaGZGh0dHA6Ly9vbnNpdGVjcmwudmVyaXNpZ24uY29tL1RoZVVuaXZlcnNp dHlvZlRleGFzU3lzdGVtVGhlVW5pdmVyc2l0eW9mVGV4YXNhdERhbGxhc0NBL0xhdGVzdENSTC5j cmwwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgUgMB0GA1UdJQQWMBQGCCsGAQUFBwMEBggrBgEFBQcDAjANBgkqhkiG9w0B AQQFAAOBgQAijCT4RiU4w568GkCtXOxYoC6lvg0m7vaF6tUkSUnuiR+BpM3tBgG+LDjYmMbl4jVW 10Or2yUAZmMtVqObAgmH085FSjBjhwVlddjTibYZLSmcvjDD6RJLzla3mtCcjkkfuBJgGgOV6vI0 kV1h6T+CY5+1ALQLKsLl15uxHOeVezCCBfcwggVgoAMCAQICEBv6vRWfzeFewbHA2MySG/4wDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwgeoxJzAlBgNVBAoTHlRoZSBVbml2ZXJzaXR5IG9mIFRleGFzIFN5c3RlbTEf MB0GA1UECxMWVmVyaVNpZ24gVHJ1c3QgTmV0d29yazE7MDkGA1UECxMyVGVybXMgb2YgdXNlIGF0 IGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9ycGEgKGMpOTkxMjAwBgNVBAsTKUNsYXNzIDIgQ0Eg LSBPblNpdGUgSW5kaXZpZHVhbCBTdWJzY3JpYmVyMS0wKwYDVQQDEyRUaGUgVW5pdmVyc2l0eSBv ZiBUZXhhcyBhdCBEYWxsYXMgQ0EwHhcNMDYwODMxMDAwMDAwWhcNMDcwODMxMjM1OTU5WjCB9DEn MCUGA1UEChQeVGhlIFVuaXZlcnNpdHkgb2YgVGV4YXMgU3lzdGVtMS0wKwYDVQQLFCRUaGUgVW5p dmVyc2l0eSBvZiBUZXhhcyBhdCBEYWxsYXMgQ0ExRjBEBgNVBAsTPXd3dy52ZXJpc2lnbi5jb20v cmVwb3NpdG9yeS9DUFMgSW5jb3JwLiBieSBSZWYuLExJQUIuTFREKGMpOTkxGDAWBgNVBAsUD01h aWwgU3RvcCAtIFVURDEVMBMGA1UEAxMMUGF1bCBTY2htZWhsMSEwHwYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhJwYXVs c0B1dGRhbGxhcy5lZHUwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQDTd5oDfJQ57rFc PIlSg5ckXcphLMxagZKIaL5iAiIi2MmXlYkANQh3DfUmCCayIxqPhBc96bCYpnQNFhhiqGhnNsbY wTxTVwL1+kmC1xtVAVArC9P4aGrLZUTp+5YAv2a5SNVN9OhONMbZRYRVGGOCnWyrcCB+hwUJTikP ci/hJmJ40N4fbg4aPcLriVUUlUsHvUiwF99Jwi1tKl+8X4Av0N6JuGEI29z9IceXPpP4mFkGQ4Fz B4V2zo42I0XL29DliNM6rZON3oZs2JIpiEcIP8YznunmRH1Mz/zfHNsrkxDJYMqJ+wehERFrg4lZ rjSnebh6zxuQn+Jc+gS6/euJAgMBAAGjggIMMIICCDAJBgNVHRMEAjAAMB0GA1UdEQQWMBSBEnBh dWxzQHV0ZGFsbGFzLmVkdTCCASQGA1UdIASCARswggEXMIIBEwYLYIZIAYb4RQEHAQYwggECMCsG CCsGAQUFBwIBFh9odHRwczovL3d3dy52ZXJpc2lnbi5jb20vcnBhLWtyMIHSBggrBgEFBQcCAjCB xRqBwk5PVElDRTogUHJpdmF0ZSBrZXkgbWF5IGJlIHJlY292ZXJlZCBieSBWZXJpU2lnbidzIGN1 c3RvbWVyIHdobyBtYXkgYmUgYWJsZSB0byBkZWNyeXB0IG1lc3NhZ2VzIHlvdSBzZW5kIHRvIGNl cnRpZmljYXRlIGhvbGRlci4gIFVzZSBpcyBzdWJqZWN0IHRvIHRlcm1zIGF0IGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3 LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9ycGEta3IgKGMpOTkuMBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIHgDB1BgNVHR8EbjBs MGqgaKBmhmRodHRwOi8vb25zaXRlY3JsLnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9UaGVVbml2ZXJzaXR5b2ZUZXhh c1N5c3RlbVRoZVVuaXZlcnNpdHlvZlRleGFzYXREYWxsYXNDQS9MYXRlc3RDUkwuY3JsMAsGA1Ud DwQEAwIHgDAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcDBAYIKwYBBQUHAwIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQADgYEA ewJ52XT/4DEWYeaKR8SgTc0DXRH79xesTdUCqp49wNJUUM20scbgNzZlvqUKpl5C5EXfERkFXV/a 72puQG3g70So6ojdJcul/GA47UBa8UmikkJuILAPOuqtvZ7lQaZ2U9nLXh0WBbpaQT7JnHQw7kaO 5k9qyJ6Nv825sFErbdMxggUdMIIFGQIBATCB/zCB6jEnMCUGA1UEChMeVGhlIFVuaXZlcnNpdHkg b2YgVGV4YXMgU3lzdGVtMR8wHQYDVQQLExZWZXJpU2lnbiBUcnVzdCBOZXR3b3JrMTswOQYDVQQL EzJUZXJtcyBvZiB1c2UgYXQgaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cudmVyaXNpZ24uY29tL3JwYSAoYyk5OTEyMDAG A1UECxMpQ2xhc3MgMiBDQSAtIE9uU2l0ZSBJbmRpdmlkdWFsIFN1YnNjcmliZXIxLTArBgNVBAMT JFRoZSBVbml2ZXJzaXR5IG9mIFRleGFzIGF0IERhbGxhcyBDQQIQG/q9FZ/N4V7BscDYzJIb/jAJ BgUrDgMCGgUAoIIC8jAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEPFw0w NjEyMTYwMTA0NDNaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBR9J8MOpHZLiHmZiBvbsEXlQc64jjBnBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQ8xWjBYMAoGCCqGSIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUr DgMCBzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDAHBgUrDgMCGjAKBggqhkiG9w0CBTCCAREGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDGC AQIwgf8wgeoxJzAlBgNVBAoTHlRoZSBVbml2ZXJzaXR5IG9mIFRleGFzIFN5c3RlbTEfMB0GA1UE CxMWVmVyaVNpZ24gVHJ1c3QgTmV0d29yazE7MDkGA1UECxMyVGVybXMgb2YgdXNlIGF0IGh0dHBz Oi8vd3d3LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9ycGEgKGMpOTkxMjAwBgNVBAsTKUNsYXNzIDIgQ0EgLSBPblNp dGUgSW5kaXZpZHVhbCBTdWJzY3JpYmVyMS0wKwYDVQQDEyRUaGUgVW5pdmVyc2l0eSBvZiBUZXhh cyBhdCBEYWxsYXMgQ0ECEBb9O0mRwehOFAm86T4s2ZowggETBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzGCAQKggf8w geoxJzAlBgNVBAoTHlRoZSBVbml2ZXJzaXR5IG9mIFRleGFzIFN5c3RlbTEfMB0GA1UECxMWVmVy aVNpZ24gVHJ1c3QgTmV0d29yazE7MDkGA1UECxMyVGVybXMgb2YgdXNlIGF0IGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3 LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9ycGEgKGMpOTkxMjAwBgNVBAsTKUNsYXNzIDIgQ0EgLSBPblNpdGUgSW5k aXZpZHVhbCBTdWJzY3JpYmVyMS0wKwYDVQQDEyRUaGUgVW5pdmVyc2l0eSBvZiBUZXhhcyBhdCBE YWxsYXMgQ0ECEBb9O0mRwehOFAm86T4s2ZowDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEggEAmmvXW0wBp11NcKLZ AFME3jh26ShsCZQIqr+vKbIR0Az153x1VbLjSUu02FXi+SJZ3a+TvbRfejqzr5J9n72r0tLqvFZ4 6XgfTpQgl1DXfto+2uXVcZQ6F/BY65tjVueFC7RSr6l0U0R9t6EQWdB0NPJd3X+156EVCvvb1+N3 TikgCAVCPsXDJZgE71XhDET+4Xo2+ijpYrtRW0pmozfBmowdBc8UQApvxZ2E4pNJzjHUvGOpj7n5 TX1iFWUaPtwe13IMW9emIj3lgyaP+MC5CNgn2UriPGkUCpkmzZNqblux8KtAgxMUTwX+66MBKzuW PySJ9rIaYSR5FmabH66mFQAAAAAAAA== ------=_NextPart_000_00A9_01C7207B.E1646DB0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 01:17:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E576016A403 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:17:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arminius@pubbox.net) Received: from pubbox.net (pubbox.net [81.169.167.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB9543CC1 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:15:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arminius@pubbox.net) Received: from e180081187.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.180.81.187] helo=pubbox.net) by pubbox.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GvOB1-000MZf-KI for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:17:23 +0100 Resent-From: Armin Arh Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:17:41 +0100 Resent-Message-ID: <20061216011741.GD826@pubbox.net> Resent-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:16:48 +0100 From: Armin Arh To: Lowell Gilbert Message-ID: <20061216011648.GC826@pubbox.net> References: <20061215045920.GA708@pubbox.net> <200612150117.01446.amistry@am-productions.biz> <20061215062326.GD708@pubbox.net> <44wt4tmbje.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44wt4tmbje.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Resent-Sender: arminius@pubbox.net Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:17:23 +0100 Cc: Subject: Re: Palm Tx + jpilot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:17:30 -0000 On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 10:19:49AM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Armin Arh writes: > > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 01:16:46AM -0500, Anish Mistry wrote: > >> > In /etc/devfs.conf: > >> > perm cuaU0 0666 > >> > > >> > but then: > >> > ## l /dev/cuaU0 > >> > crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer - 0, 113 Dec 15 05:00 /dev/cuaU0 > >> > > >> > The /dev/devfs.conf permissions only apply when i run > >> > "/etc/rc.d/devfs restart" This is a nogo because i have only 1 > >> > second between pressing sync on the Handheld and clicking sync on > >> > jpilot. > >> man devfs.rules > > > > Thx. > > Now devfs.rules(5) redirects me to devfs.conf(5) > > which clearly states i should set > > > > perm cuaU0 0666 > > > > and i did so as described in my initial post. > > Nevertheless the permissions became wrong. > > Maybe it works after the next reboot, which is hard to > > believe... we'll see. > > You need devfs.rules, *not* devfs.conf. > Try the manual page for the former again. > After some reading i decided to give this one a try: # devfs rule add path cuaU0 mode 666 devfs rule: ioctl DEVFSIO_RADD: Input/output error And then, i still do not understand why i need devfs.rules, because i can set the file mode in devfs.conf. Armin -- PUBBOX Postmaster + spam-killer. Free email addresses at http://pubbox.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 01:18:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D22316A403 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:18:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ranger@oldpathsbaptistchurch.org) Received: from trinity.vnet-inc.com (matrix.vnet-inc.com [216.129.224.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F8C743C9D for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:16:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ranger@oldpathsbaptistchurch.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.vnet-inc.com [127.0.0.1]) by trinity.vnet-inc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 365A35A43F64 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:18:11 -0700 (MST) Received: from trinity.vnet-inc.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (matrix.vnet-inc.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59360-04 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:18:11 -0700 (MST) Received: from [192.168.139.205] (unknown [65.19.244.43]) by trinity.vnet-inc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2DD5A43C1D for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:18:10 -0700 (MST) From: Old Ranger Organization: OPBC To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:18:08 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612151818.08425.ranger@oldpathsbaptistchurch.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at vnet-inc.com Subject: Re: cvsup and amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:18:23 -0000 On Friday 15 December 2006 18:04, Schmehl, Paul L wrote: > Please tell me, did I need to specify anything specifically about the amd64 > architecture when running cvsup? Did I possibly get a GENERIC kernel file > through cvsup that is not compatible with amd? > > ********************************************************************** > > Sorry for the horrible formatting, but for reasons beyond my control, I > only have access to Microsoft Outlook right now. It appears no one has > answered you yet, so, to alleviate your fears, yes, unless you've changed > the kernel in any way (and it sounds like you haven't), a simple make > buildkernel and make installkernel should work just fine. Reboot > afterwards, and you should be running the new kernel. The only reason you > would *need* to make a change would be if you're running dual processors or > you need to customize the kernel for performance reasons. Otherwise the > GENERIC kernel will suffice. > > Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) > Senior Information Security Analyst > University of Texas at Dallas > http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ **** Thank you! Somehow, I got through it today, with SMP working too! I had a little problem with mergemaster, after buildworld, which had a couple of problems that I got around with the make -k argument. Some things didn't get built. Mergemaster rejected some files - /var/tmp/temproot/etc/rc.d/jail /var/tmp/temproot/etc/ssh/ssh_config /var/tmp/temproot/etc/ssh/sshd.config /var/tmp/temproot/etc/motd I elected to "merge by hand", just to coplete the process. Now I'll have to learn what it means to "merge by hand." Thanks to all who responded with advice and insights. I have now a working amd64x2 kernel and a partially built, installed, and merged world. There are still some strange messages appearing at boot time. That's for another day. Z. Wade Hampton Twin Bridges, Montana From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 01:32:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6CE16A40F for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:32:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arminius@pubbox.net) Received: from pubbox.net (pubbox.net [81.169.167.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F65B43C9D for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:31:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arminius@pubbox.net) Received: from e180081187.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.180.81.187] helo=pubbox.net) by pubbox.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GvOPx-000O7L-Ay for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:32:49 +0100 Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:33:06 +0100 From: Armin Arh To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061216013306.GE826@pubbox.net> References: <20061215045920.GA708@pubbox.net> <200612150117.01446.amistry@am-productions.biz> <20061215062326.GD708@pubbox.net> <44wt4tmbje.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20061216011648.GC826@pubbox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061216011648.GC826@pubbox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: arminius@pubbox.net Subject: Re: Palm Tx + jpilot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:32:51 -0000 On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 02:16:48AM +0100, Armin Arh wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 10:19:49AM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > Armin Arh writes: > > > > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 01:16:46AM -0500, Anish Mistry wrote: > > >> > In /etc/devfs.conf: > > >> > perm cuaU0 0666 > > >> > > > >> > but then: > > >> > ## l /dev/cuaU0 > > >> > crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer - 0, 113 Dec 15 05:00 /dev/cuaU0 > > >> > > > >> > The /dev/devfs.conf permissions only apply when i run > > >> > "/etc/rc.d/devfs restart" This is a nogo because i have only 1 > > >> > second between pressing sync on the Handheld and clicking sync on > > >> > jpilot. > > >> man devfs.rules > > > > > > Thx. > > > Now devfs.rules(5) redirects me to devfs.conf(5) > > > which clearly states i should set > > > > > > perm cuaU0 0666 > > > > > > and i did so as described in my initial post. > > > Nevertheless the permissions became wrong. > > > Maybe it works after the next reboot, which is hard to > > > believe... we'll see. > > > > You need devfs.rules, *not* devfs.conf. > > Try the manual page for the former again. > > > After some reading i decided to give this one a try: > > # devfs rule add path cuaU0 mode 666 > devfs rule: ioctl DEVFSIO_RADD: Input/output error > > And then, i still do not understand why i need devfs.rules, > because i can set the file mode in devfs.conf. Oh, nice.... ## devfs rule -s 10 add path cuaU0 mode 666 ## devfs rule showsets 10 but then again: ## devfs rule add path cuaU0 mode 666 devfs rule: ioctl DEVFSIO_RADD: Input/output error => there is no predefined default ruleset (man page should state this fact besides the '-s' option) ## devfs ruleset 10 ## devfs rule add path cuaU0 mode 666 ## devfs rule show 100 path cuaU0 mode 666 200 path cuaU0 mode 666 I'm getting closer... Armin -- PUBBOX Postmaster + spam-killer. Free email addresses at http://pubbox.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 01:53:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045C816A407 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:53:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arminius@pubbox.net) Received: from pubbox.net (pubbox.net [81.169.167.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8CE43C9D for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:51:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arminius@pubbox.net) Received: from e180081187.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.180.81.187] helo=pubbox.net) by pubbox.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GvOk6-0000fV-90 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:53:38 +0100 Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:53:55 +0100 From: Armin Arh To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061216015355.GF826@pubbox.net> References: <20061215045920.GA708@pubbox.net> <200612150117.01446.amistry@am-productions.biz> <20061215062326.GD708@pubbox.net> <44wt4tmbje.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20061216011648.GC826@pubbox.net> <20061216013306.GE826@pubbox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061216013306.GE826@pubbox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: arminius@pubbox.net Subject: Re: Palm Tx + jpilot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:53:40 -0000 Finally, This is the solution to get a Palm TX work with FBSD-6.X load the kernel modules 'uvisor.ko', 'ucom.ko', e.g. like this: (if not already done at boot time) kldload uvisor kldload ucom In order to set up the devfs rules manually do something like this: devfs ruleset 10 devfs rule add path cuaU* unhide mode 666 (note that 666 is fine for me, this may not suit your possibly more restricted environment) For a permanent setup this can be done via /etc/devfs.rules: #----- [devfsrules_palm=4] add path 'cuaU*' unhide mode 666 #----- plus this has to be mentioned in /etc/rc.conf: #----- devfs_system_ruleset="devfsrules_palm" #----- It comes in handy to have a symlink where jpilot is searching the handheld. ln -s /dev/cuaU0 pilot enjoy, Armin -- PUBBOX Postmaster + spam-killer. Free email addresses at http://pubbox.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 02:14:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D29816A494 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:14:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4708343C9E for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:12:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.141] (may be forged)) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBG2E0Uv010724 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:14:00 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBG2E0ie024352 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:14:00 -0800 Message-ID: <45835661.5060402@u.washington.edu> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:13:53 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2006.12.15.175933 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Unicode support on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:14:01 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Just wondering if and how I would go about getting Unicode support setup on FreeBSD. Any links I could get would be more than appreciated. Finally got fed up with instability on my Gentoo setup, so it's time to move to something better :). - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFg1ZhEnKyINQw/HARAjrvAKCMnTv7Pb7y4GmHmorcMxxbbdLELACgjwpk YNuiP7abOzDCVDb8wyOVPgM= =eVg2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 02:24:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE76516A583 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:24:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from stargate.alaskaparadise.com (114-103-74-65.gci.net [65.74.103.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0173543C9E for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:22:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stargate.alaskaparadise.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C4145B5; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:24:27 -0900 (AKST) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: Alaska Paradise Travel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:24:20 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200612151818.08425.ranger@oldpathsbaptistchurch.org> In-Reply-To: <200612151818.08425.ranger@oldpathsbaptistchurch.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1216358.kvGJVCPNgr"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200612151724.24112.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Cc: Old Ranger Subject: Re: cvsup and amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:24:28 -0000 --nextPart1216358.kvGJVCPNgr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 15 December 2006 16:18, Old Ranger wrote: > On Friday 15 December 2006 18:04, Schmehl, Paul L wrote: > > Please tell me, did I need to specify anything specifically about the > > amd64 architecture when running cvsup? Did I possibly get a GENERIC > > kernel file through cvsup that is not compatible with amd? > > > > ********************************************************************** > > > > Sorry for the horrible formatting, but for reasons beyond my control, I > > only have access to Microsoft Outlook right now. It appears no one has > > answered you yet, so, to alleviate your fears, yes, unless you've chang= ed > > the kernel in any way (and it sounds like you haven't), a simple make > > buildkernel and make installkernel should work just fine. Reboot > > afterwards, and you should be running the new kernel. The only reason > > you would *need* to make a change would be if you're running dual > > processors or you need to customize the kernel for performance reasons.= =20 > > Otherwise the GENERIC kernel will suffice. > > > > Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) > > Senior Information Security Analyst > > University of Texas at Dallas > > http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ > > **** > > Thank you! > Somehow, I got through it today, with SMP working too! > > I had a little problem with mergemaster, after buildworld, which had a > couple of problems that I got around with the make -k argument. > Some things didn't get built. > > > Mergemaster rejected some files - /var/tmp/temproot/etc/rc.d/jail > /var/tmp/temproot/etc/ssh/ssh_config > /var/tmp/temproot/etc/ssh/sshd.config > /var/tmp/temproot/etc/motd > > I elected to "merge by hand", just to coplete the process. > Now I'll have to learn what it means to "merge by hand." > > Thanks to all who responded with advice and insights. > > I have now a working amd64x2 kernel and a partially built, installed, and > merged world. > > There are still some strange messages appearing at boot time. > > That's for another day. Merge by hand means to go to /usr/src/etc and copy the files you need to /e= tc=20 then add in any changes by hand. Since you are doing a fresh install, just= =20 copy the files to /etc and you should be fine. Beech =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart1216358.kvGJVCPNgr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFg1jXp5D0B1NlT4URAu93AJwKSa56GgBrsNUcLMaXHFDtAv+5qgCbBTvZ 8N59pzoDIqdpUSWiFZiFc9c= =akSh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1216358.kvGJVCPNgr-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 03:36:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2ABD16A407 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 03:36:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tfcheng@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3780743CA0 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 03:34:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tfcheng@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so902343uge for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:36:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=JDqRnYJ5LP5W+95zX+PLi40tfiSrcjnUj46Lj1SE88GWx/eK2us4izKYVhu/ATGEPGRuJVNItCVgC6ZOTc5i2pVopKqc6qeB9PYRy9AO2k7QuJHPmVq/YcxjjjGcSeGxri1W4F1cxSAZBni30G/M/794qa4cmEoi46en+rhyz94= Received: by 10.78.134.12 with SMTP id h12mr400653hud.1166240173516; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:36:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.107.19 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:36:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:36:13 -0500 From: "Tsu-Fan Cheng" To: "Garrett Cooper" In-Reply-To: <45835661.5060402@u.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <45835661.5060402@u.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unicode support on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 03:36:16 -0000 hi, i just taste the flavor of unicode a while ago, my point is to read chinese/jap file name which file is downloaded over the internet. i installed rxvt-unicode, and set my env in .cshrc LC_CTYPE to zh_TW.UTF-8, and i think now i can read those file name with no problemo... TFC On 12/15/06, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello, > Just wondering if and how I would go about getting Unicode > support setup on FreeBSD. Any links I could get would be more than > appreciated. > Finally got fed up with instability on my Gentoo setup, so it's > time to move to something better :). > - -Garrett > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFFg1ZhEnKyINQw/HARAjrvAKCMnTv7Pb7y4GmHmorcMxxbbdLELACgjwpk > YNuiP7abOzDCVDb8wyOVPgM= > =eVg2 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 03:45:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF4E16A416 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 03:45:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6552543CA0 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 03:44:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBG3jmb8007650 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:45:48 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBG3jl4s031571 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:45:47 -0800 Message-ID: <45836BE4.7010306@u.washington.edu> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:45:40 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45835661.5060402@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2006.12.15.193434 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: Unicode support on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 03:45:49 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: > hi, > i just taste the flavor of unicode a while ago, my point is to read > chinese/jap file name which file is downloaded over the internet. i > installed rxvt-unicode, and set my env in .cshrc LC_CTYPE to zh_TW.UTF-8, > and i think now i can read those file name with no problemo... > > TFC > > On 12/15/06, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> > Hello, > Just wondering if and how I would go about getting Unicode > support setup on FreeBSD. Any links I could get would be more than > appreciated. > Finally got fed up with instability on my Gentoo setup, so it's > time to move to something better :). > -Garrett Ok. It appears as if Freebsd is definitely the best choice (over other non-Linux Unix Opensource OSes--including OpenBSD and Open Solaris) for a Unicode support. Just tired of what the Linux crowd has been doing with the I/O scheduler and schedulers in the kernel, and Reiserfs support has gotten worse as of late it appears (kernel version 2.6.18 with 'emission' kernel patches). It really lags my system at times -_-.. - -Garrett PS TFC, I know you were having Chinese locale problems earlier--did you try some of the solutions given here--by chance? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFg2vkEnKyINQw/HARAh8uAJ41OMKGWl77xZmdJTQm2l33QUhl/QCfTj0R S2GAdrIFHCV6ydLaiI90kTg= =3I/p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 04:02:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA6516A403 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 04:02:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tspivey@pcdesk.net) Received: from pcdesk.net (ns.pcdesk.net [65.100.173.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0083243C9D for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 04:00:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tspivey@pcdesk.net) Received: from localhost ([::ffff:70.68.38.175]) (AUTH: LOGIN tspivey@pcdesk.net) by pcdesk.net with esmtp; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:02:25 -0700 id 0180F9B9.45836FD2.000018DB Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:02:36 -0800 From: Tyler Spivey To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061216040236.GA42328@kanadio> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Subject: VA Linux FullON 2230 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 04:02:35 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This may be a bit off-topic, but if someone could please email me and tell me how to get the hds out ofthis thing once the fan assembly is removed, that would be appreciated. Thanks, Tyler -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFg2/cTsjaYASMWKQRApBQAJ43SR3fd4IG64ENV2g09SWv9BEzbACgivQO KHoxhG0/5c2qjRyitkaRUWg= =D03X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 04:53:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6998F16A407 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 04:53:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BCA443CA6 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 04:51:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 15 Dec 2006 23:53:40 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id MQZ96716; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:53:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-203-219.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.203.219]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 15 Dec 2006 23:53:38 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.12,178,1165208400"; d="scan'208"; a="334058192:sNHT138354032" From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17795.31520.75174.70348@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:50:40 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <45836BE4.7010306@u.washington.edu> References: <45835661.5060402@u.washington.edu> <45836BE4.7010306@u.washington.edu> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail: UCE(51) X-Junkmail-Status: score=51/50, host=mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=bulk(1), refid=str=0001.0A090203.45837A8C.0080,ss=3,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.121/2006-09-27 Subject: Re: Unicode support on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 04:53:42 -0000 Garrett Cooper writes: > Ok. It appears as if Freebsd is definitely the best choice > (over other non-Linux Unix Opensource OSes--including OpenBSD and > Open Solaris) for a Unicode support. It's worth noting that while this solution may work, it's an add-on. The question of Unicode is complex; you should check for relevant threads in the questions@ and i18n@ archives. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 05:34:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56EBF16A403 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 05:34:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D908443CA0 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 05:32:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so1259664nfc for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:34:40 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Hsgp8qJAyac9yv/07ezUGjleurzNInw0bX0ZzK0Vc445CbIapqmmytxrJe65vwz2EjYR2kjRZngOK5e8epZg5LHl0nB3ndmLBtedHbVe7b01xWGKrO8pPFD+hianOQpFtsxq/TdrtdIIiQm4axpN7Kqh9PxhSpeJ0OdetNONexc= Received: by 10.82.179.9 with SMTP id b9mr140695buf.1166247279788; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:34:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.175.1 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:34:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:34:39 -0600 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Z. Wade Hampton" In-Reply-To: <200612151209.04931.zwade@oldpathsbaptistchurch.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200612151209.04931.zwade@oldpathsbaptistchurch.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: buildkernel error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 05:34:42 -0000 On 15/12/06, Z. Wade Hampton wrote: > Hello to all, > I have MY_KERNEL in the following location... > > /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/MY_KERNEL > > When I run... > > make buildkernel KERNCONF=MY_KERNEL > > I get.... > > > ERROR: Missing kernel configuration file(s) (MY_KERNEL). > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > # > > > I'm running 6.1, fresh cvsup to 6.1-RELEASE-p11. > > > Why won't buildkernel find MY_KERNEL? If I recall correctly from a previous missive, you are running amd64, which would mean your kernel conf is (or should be) in /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf . -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 10:04:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B67916A412 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:04:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bunchou@googlemail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D36E43CB8 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:04:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bunchou@googlemail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so1304224nfc for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:04:16 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=googlemail.com; h=received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ESdAVL7v/KlV74J8YwRNL3Fu0c5aczBUv/uvEra6mIYDZSDOEifdslOCoa6oOHNwue2J4OsGBQsLJ0KrRCh5IAkpoN4KH5hf6ZWdFqqOtbAVhjGoj9KjtAD3vrfGiywLWxi83CBHAEtizsoTSTDJVPiNYUiBy7eYmsJqsAwZ520= Received: by 10.49.90.18 with SMTP id s18mr1409170nfl.1166263456133; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:04:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from direwolf.5550h.net ( [82.141.55.184]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m15sm18277242nfc.2006.12.16.02.04.14; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:04:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:04:05 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?5paH6bOl?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061216110405.5bfc244b@direwolf.5550h.net> In-Reply-To: <17795.31520.75174.70348@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <45835661.5060402@u.washington.edu> <45836BE4.7010306@u.washington.edu> <17795.31520.75174.70348@jerusalem.litteratus.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.2 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Unicode support on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:04:26 -0000 > It's worth noting that while this solution may work, it's an > add-on. > The question of Unicode is complex; you should check for > relevant threads in the questions@ and i18n@ archives. I am using FreeBSD 6.1. with locale set to ja_JP.UTF-8 for quite some time now, and it's working splendidly. Gnome/KDE work fine, fluxbox is a bit more difficult to set up correctly when it comes to Japanese / Unicode. The only problem I did come across is CD9660-Unicode support: whenever I try to use a CD created on Windows containing Japanese file names, I screws up completely (filenames become mojibake). Messing around with mount options does not help, but reverting to ja_JP.eucJP does. I think it's a bug, but I am not sure. I posted a message to questions@ concerning this problem, but didn't get one answer, so I don't know whether I should post a PR. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 10:55:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E3516A407 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:55:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rob@coombs.anu.edu.au) Received: from canyonero.dot.net.au (canyonero.dot.net.au [202.147.68.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964ED43C9D for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:55:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rob@coombs.anu.edu.au) Received: from [203.129.54.140] (helo=freebsd.connect-a.com.au) by canyonero.dot.net.au with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1GvXCY-0000xY-00 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 21:55:34 +1100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebsd.connect-a.com.au (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBGAtJN5042061 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 21:55:19 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from rob@coombs.anu.edu.au) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 21:55:19 +1100 (EST) From: Rob Hurle X-X-Sender: rob@freebsd.connect-a.com.au To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200612150017.42734.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> Message-ID: <20061216214029.A1320@freebsd.connect-a.com.au> References: <4581A9FD.1060301@brunson.com> <20061214201130.GA96791@xor.obsecurity.org> <20061214155438.DC4C.GERARD@seibercom.net> <200612150017.42734.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,MR_DIFF_MID autolearn=failed version=3.1.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on freebsd.connect-a.com.au Subject: Re: Upgrade a binary package X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:55:51 -0000 This thread has been interesting: On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, RW wrote: > Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:17:42 +0000 > From: RW > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Upgrade a binary package > > On Thursday 14 December 2006 20:55, Gerard Seibert wrote: >> On Thursday December 14, 2006 at 03:11:30 (PM) Kris Kennaway wrote: >>>> ... >>>> I only find info on "pkg_add" and "pkg_delete" for binary packages, the >>>> only references to updating a package give directions on how to use the >>>> ports tree. >>>> >>>> Is there a way to update an installed package with a newer version? >>> >>> sysutils/portupgrade is the usual tool. I think portmaster can do this >>> too. >> >> portmanager lang/expect -l > > Portmanager cannot upgrade from binary packages - only from ports. > > One thing that hasn't been mentioned is that the packages for a release are > not normally updated. From the handbook, 4.4.1 Installing a Package: > > "Note: pkg_add(1) will download the latest version of your application if you > are using FreeBSD-CURRENT or FreeBSD-STABLE. If you run a -RELEASE version, > it will grab the version of the package that was built with your release. It > is possible to change this behavior by overriding the PACKAGESITE environment > variable." > > See the manual for how to fetch 6-stable packages But, how to do this using portupgrade? I have: #uname -a FreeBSD freebsd.connect-a.com.au 6.1-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p5A and in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf we see: OS_PKGBRANCH="6-stable" but when I try portupgrade, this is what happens: ++ Will try the following sites in the order named: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.1-release/ That is, portupgrade always tries the release version and, of course, the "stable" version is not there. If I manually try the above ftp location, it is possible to navigate to .../packages-6-stable. How can I make portupgrade do what it is told and get to this stable branch? Do I have to cvsup the system to 6-STABLE (which I intend to do fairly soon anyway)? Do I have to manually retrieve the "stable" packages? The portupgrade command is: portupgrade -rPn kde (the "n" is there at the moment for testing). Any ideas as to where to look would be great (the Handbook as installed on my 6.1 release is no help in this area). Thanks heaps. Cheers, Rob Hurle ----------------------------------------------------- Rob Hurle Faculty of Asian Studies, ANU Home address and contacts: Tel: +61 2 6247 2397 PO Box 4013 Fax: +61 2 6247 2397 Ainslie Cell phone: 0417 293 603 Australia e-mail: rob@coombs.anu.edu.au ----------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 12:15:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30ABC16A40F for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:15:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beni@brinckman.info) Received: from sun.schedom-europe.net (sun.schedom-europe.net [193.109.184.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F41B43C9F for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:15:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beni@brinckman.info) Received: (qmail 7843 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2006 12:34:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (83.101.7.37) by sun.schedom-europe.net with SMTP; 16 Dec 2006 12:34:39 -0000 From: Beni To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 13:15:02 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 X-Face: %*c?V7%A[c.}s2rI*TaRWm-[I-, ZLpBKmmC-@)J}KGbr)=a, TsXSA=:ArC(<=?utf-8?q?v=5C/=5F=25BaB=24K=0A=09=24=60E=7D6=7EyjIqu/SN=3A=24Pb=7DGngR+8=3D?= =?utf-8?q?dE=60?=)V~48zl6) =?utf-8?q?BhEtfQ2=3D=7ChScx=3Frn30d!QMd=3F=2E=60/hR!l+=0A=09x?=(]+zXesMf?'W[>46aPKMAAwd7eT{X_O9besb[u]'Y(DAe MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612161315.03256.beni@brinckman.info> Subject: removing x11/linux-XFree86-libs ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:15:16 -0000 Hi all, I noticed that x11/linux-XFree86-libs has been replaced by x11/linux-xorg-libs. I can deinstall and reinstall the linux-xorg-libs but how do I remove the installed port linux-XFree86-libs ? Portmaster aborts updating my ports with the following error and I can't go into the original linux-XFree86-libs portsdirectory cause it doesn't exist any more... So, how do I remove this XFree86 thing (which was normally installed also from ports) ? ... ===>>> Checking installed port: libwpd-0.8.7 ===>>> Checking installed port: libxine-1.1.3 ===>>> Checking installed port: libxml2-2.6.26 ===>>> Checking installed port: libxslt-1.1.17 ===>>> Checking installed port: linc-1.0.3_6 ===>>> Checking installed port: linux-XFree86-libs-4.3.99.902_7 ===>>> The x11/linux-XFree86-libs port has been deleted: Has expired: superseeded by linux-xorg-libs port ===>>> Aborting update www# www# whereis linux-XFree86-libs linux-XFree86-libs: www# Thanks, Beni. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 12:25:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8296616A47C for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:25:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from muxas@mail.ru) Received: from mx27.mail.ru (mx27.mail.ru [194.67.23.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8352143CC3 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:25:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from muxas@mail.ru) Received: from [80.243.71.203] (port=18125 helo=[10.0.1.3]) by mx27.mail.ru with asmtp id 1GvYbk-00046N-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:25:40 +0300 Message-ID: <4583E577.6060205@mail.ru> Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:24:23 +1000 From: Maxim Vetrov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; ru-RU; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061202 SeaMonkey/1.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: devd usage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:25:51 -0000 Hi, I'm running 6.1 on Toshiba notebook SAtellite L100. Get stuck with auto config of wireless cardbus adapter (D-Link DWL-G650). I want to load kernel module (if_ath.ko) automatically when I insert it into the slot. I found that I need /etc/devd.conf to be configured properly. There is a Deqna example that is quite self-explaining excluding those magic numbers assigned to "manufacturer" and "product". Where I can get these? Regards, Muxas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 12:18:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C1FC16A492 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:18:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pjn0211@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc3-s25.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc3-s25.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB7D43CA7 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:18:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pjn0211@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([64.4.51.42]) by bay0-omc3-s25.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Sat, 16 Dec 2006 04:18:30 -0800 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 04:18:30 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 64.4.51.220 by by107fd.bay107.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:18:26 GMT X-Originating-IP: [124.121.92.171] X-Originating-Email: [pjn0211@hotmail.com] X-Sender: pjn0211@hotmail.com From: "Supote Leelasuppakorn" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 19:18:26 +0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Dec 2006 12:18:30.0026 (UTC) FILETIME=[4BE966A0:01C7210C] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:39:05 +0000 Subject: Need explaination for `date` command ! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:18:31 -0000 Hi lists, I am currently using FreeBSD-6.1 for a while. I am in Thailand so my time zone is GMT+7. Let say the time is 3:00 PM in Thailand. What I would like to know is 1. What is the output of `date` command I should get ? 2. What is the output of `date -u` command I should get ? TIA ------------------------------------ Pote :-) ------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 14:03:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8E816A403 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:03:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fk@zepher.dyndns.org) Received: from rosy.dyndns.org (softbank220038116012.bbtec.net [220.38.116.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 211D843CA1 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:03:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fk@zepher.dyndns.org) Received: (qmail 78100 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2006 13:50:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Dec 2006 13:50:01 -0000 To: fk@zepher.dyndns.org In-Reply-To: <20061210152756J.fk@zepher.dyndns.org> References: <20061210061828K.fk@zepher.dyndns.org> <457b3f3a.e4Sf+YRQsI6sLl6z%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20061210152756J.fk@zepher.dyndns.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.2 on Emacs 19.34 / Mule 2.3 (SUETSUMUHANA) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20061216224959X.fk@zepher.dyndns.org> Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:49:59 +0900 From: FK X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 115 Cc: perryh@pluto.rain.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How can I fix "Cannot find file system superblock" problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:03:15 -0000 Dear all, Still I can not solove the problem. Maybe it is high time to give up, but before that I wonder, as everybody who has had this kind of trouble does, I could mount it read-only and back up my own data. The data is too precious for me to lose... Thank you for your support. -- FK. From: FK Subject: Re: How can I fix "Cannot find file system superblock" problem? Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:27:56 +0900 Message-ID: <20061210152756J.fk@zepher.dyndns.org> fk> Dear all members, fk> fk> From: perryh@pluto.rain.com fk> Subject: Re: How can I fix "Cannot find file system superblock" problem? fk> Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 14:56:58 -0800 fk> Message-ID: <457b3f3a.e4Sf+YRQsI6sLl6z%perryh@pluto.rain.com> fk> fk> perryh> > #diff -s sb1 sb2 fk> perryh> > Files sb1 and sb2 are identical fk> perryh> > #diff -s sb1 sb3 fk> perryh> > Files sb1 and sb3 are identical fk> perryh> fk> perryh> It might be worthwhile to check one of these identical "alternates" fk> perryh> against the "real" superblock. (AFAIK only the first 512 bytes, or fk> perryh> less, actually matter.) You might also post a dump of the first 512 fk> perryh> bytes and see if anyone notices anything. fk> fk> Thank you for your reply. fk> Following your suggestions, I tried these. fk> fk> #dd if=/dev/da0s2a skip=0 bs=512 count=16 of=sb0 fk> 16+0 records in fk> 16+0 records out fk> 8192 bytes transferred in 0.011918 secs (687360 bytes/sec) fk> fk> #diff -s sb0 sb1 fk> Binary files sb0 and sb1 differ fk> fk> Dump for the master superblock (the first 512 bytes only). fk> #od -x sb0 fk> 0000000 d440 10fa 9b10 09e1 9524 7b55 f334 153f fk> 0000020 f190 0b4a 387c 5d46 1b94 14b0 ae10 0b19 fk> 0000040 4e3c b446 b870 138f 7190 0ab7 ff52 75e6 fk> 0000060 5dac 130e bbf0 0a8a 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> 0000100 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> 0000120 1d12 7b57 1a88 113f d610 0a84 a2be 064f fk> 0000140 7eb8 1226 3290 0a44 9e3c 7b57 f870 0f9e fk> 0000160 cb00 0932 cad0 7b57 1764 13e4 31d0 0ad4 fk> 0000200 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 4bfa 7b58 fk> 0000220 f54c 1243 41e0 0a4e f1a6 41f0 d97c 13ef fk> 0000240 eb00 0ad7 cd24 7b58 d334 10a3 66d0 09c8 fk> 0000260 be3c 6d39 7870 15ab d1b0 0b6f 52be 7b59 fk> 0000300 3eb8 0fe3 4600 0973 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> 0000320 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> 0000340 007c 7b5a 3b94 1288 2820 0a65 f890 3fda fk> 0000360 1440 15e3 b780 0b82 81a6 7b5a 197c 10e8 fk> 0000400 ed10 09da 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> 0000420 2f66 7b5b 1658 138d ed60 0ab5 0000 0000 fk> 0000440 0000 0000 0000 0000 b090 7b5b f440 11ec fk> 0000460 2d70 0a30 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> 0000500 31ba 7b5c d228 104c cff0 09ad 5e4e 7b5c fk> 0000520 f11c 1491 98e0 0b0f ff52 78a4 5dac 11c6 fk> 0000540 18f0 0a23 e3e8 7b5c 5ca0 13d1 c3d0 0acd fk> 0000560 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 6512 7b5d fk> 0000600 3a88 1231 d3e0 0a47 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> 0000620 0000 0000 e63c 7b5d 1870 1091 a8d0 09c1 fk> 0000640 9abe 514e 5eb8 1471 9230 0b04 0000 0000 fk> 0000660 0000 0000 0000 0000 93fa 7b5e 154c 1336 fk> 0000700 5920 0a98 2ae4 26ef 9010 14b5 c730 0b1b fk> 0000720 1524 7b5f f334 1195 8930 0a12 41ba 7b5f fk> 0000740 1228 15db daa0 0b7f 9abe 7b5f 5eb8 10d5 fk> 0000760 8f10 09d4 c2e4 7b5f f010 143a d4a0 0af1 fk> fk> Dump for one of alternative superblock (the first 512 bytes only). fk> #od -x sb1 fk> 0000000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0028 0000 0030 0000 fk> 0000020 0038 0000 0bb8 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> 0000040 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0033 0000 fk> 0000060 4000 0000 0800 0000 0008 0000 0008 0000 fk> 0000100 0000 0000 0000 0000 c000 ffff f800 ffff fk> 0000120 000e 0000 000b 0000 0008 0000 0800 0000 fk> 0000140 0003 0000 0002 0000 0800 0000 0000 0000 fk> 0000160 0000 0000 0800 0000 0040 0000 0000 0000 fk> 0000200 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> 0000220 bf56 444b a5bf c858 0000 0000 0800 0000 fk> 0000240 4000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> 0000260 0000 0000 0000 0000 5c00 0000 6f88 0001 fk> 0000300 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> 0000320 0100 8000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> 0000340 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> * fk> 0001520 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 4000 0000 fk> fk> fk> Does my superblock have anything wrong? fk> fk> This dump analysis is beyond my tecknical knowledge. fk> So Thanks a lot for your help! fk> fk> -- fk> FK. fk> _______________________________________________ fk> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list fk> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions fk> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 14:11:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413A316A407 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:11:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD2D43CA7 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:11:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.141]) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBGEBNBP005244 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 06:11:23 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.102] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBGEBMNC017506 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 06:11:23 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <4583E577.6060205@mail.ru> References: <4583E577.6060205@mail.ru> X-Gpgmail-State: !signed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Garrett Cooper Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 06:11:23 -0800 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2006.12.16.55433 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Subject: Inconsistencies with FreeBSD installation FTP servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:11:24 -0000 For some odd reason I can't get FTP/FTP-passive based transactions to work on my new system (bails after the first install floppy completes), and when working with different releases it appears that older releases than 6.1 don't have kernel directories (!). Is this a design choice or are the maintainers perhaps missing directories when updating releases? TIA, -Garrett PS This has been a problem since 5.4, and is only solved using NFS on what used to be my linux box, but unfortunately I can't specify a root owned NFS share in Freebsd on my former install platform, so I'm sort of stuck.. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 14:15:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4359616A49E for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:15:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oregnier@ixsys.org) Received: from 30.mail-out.ovh.net (30.mail-out.ovh.net [213.186.62.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DA6943CB4 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:15:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oregnier@ixsys.org) Received: (qmail 26091 invoked by uid 503); 16 Dec 2006 14:15:23 -0000 Received: (QMFILT: 1.0); 16 Dec 2006 14:15:23 -0000 Received: from b6.ovh.net (HELO mail239.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.56) by 30.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 16 Dec 2006 14:15:23 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue-out) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 16 Dec 2006 14:15:08 -0000 Received: from mac76-2-82-241-6-173.fbx.proxad.net (HELO unknown) (82.241.6.173) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 16 Dec 2006 14:15:07 -0000 Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:16:24 +0100 From: Olivier Regnier To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20061216151624.d08cc32a.oregnier@ixsys.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.10 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Ovh-Remote: 82.241.6.173 (mac76-2-82-241-6-173.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|H 0.5/N Subject: New style with Fluxbox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:15:30 -0000 Hello, Yesterday, i installed by the ports, fluxbox version 0.1.14_2 on my laptop with FreeBSD 6.1. I downloaded a new style called Mysta with theses files: - theme.cfg - pixmaps (button.xpm, menu.xpm and toolbar.xpm) Theses files are in /usr/X11R6/share/fluxbox/styles . The permissions are ok but i don't see my new theme in Fluxbox menu called Styles. Perhaps, i forgot to install a packages, i don't know what happened. Can you help me please ? Thanks in advance. Olivier Regnier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 14:25:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47F316A4A0 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:25:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steinex@nognu.de) Received: from shodan.nognu.de (shodan.nognu.de [85.14.216.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5377943C9F for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:25:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steinex@nognu.de) Received: by shodan.nognu.de (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 94C90B830; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:25:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:25:22 +0100 From: Frank Steinborn To: Rob Hurle Mail-Followup-To: Rob Hurle , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4581A9FD.1060301@brunson.com> <20061214201130.GA96791@xor.obsecurity.org> <20061214155438.DC4C.GERARD@seibercom.net> <200612150017.42734.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> <20061216214029.A1320@freebsd.connect-a.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061216214029.A1320@freebsd.connect-a.com.au> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) Message-Id: <20061216142522.94C90B830@shodan.nognu.de> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade a binary package X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:25:24 -0000 Rob Hurle wrote: > But, how to do this using portupgrade? I have: > > #uname -a > FreeBSD freebsd.connect-a.com.au 6.1-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p5A > > and in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf we see: > > OS_PKGBRANCH="6-stable" > > but when I try portupgrade, this is what happens: > > ++ Will try the following sites in the order named: > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.1-release/ Set PACKAGESITE. For sh: export PACKAGESITE="ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/Latest/" Frank From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 14:41:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD9716A40F for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:41:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5B943CA5 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:41:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from admin.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Gvaiv-000CMh-4i; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 17:41:13 +0300 Received: from bsam by ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Gvak1-000AHN-OO; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 17:42:21 +0300 To: Beni References: <200612161315.03256.beni@brinckman.info> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 17:42:21 +0300 In-Reply-To: <200612161315.03256.beni@brinckman.info> (beni@brinckman.info's message of "Sat, 16 Dec 2006 13:15:02 +0100") Message-ID: <59472978@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: removing x11/linux-XFree86-libs ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:41:15 -0000 On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 13:15:02 +0100 Beni wrote: > I noticed that x11/linux-XFree86-libs has been replaced by > x11/linux-xorg-libs. I can deinstall and reinstall the linux-xorg-libs but > how do I remove the installed port linux-XFree86-libs ? Portmaster aborts > updating my ports with the following error and I can't go into the original > linux-XFree86-libs portsdirectory cause it doesn't exist any more... > So, how do I remove this XFree86 thing (which was normally installed also from > ports) ? > ... > ===>>> Checking installed port: libwpd-0.8.7 > ===>>> Checking installed port: libxine-1.1.3 > ===>>> Checking installed port: libxml2-2.6.26 > ===>>> Checking installed port: libxslt-1.1.17 > ===>>> Checking installed port: linc-1.0.3_6 > ===>>> Checking installed port: linux-XFree86-libs-4.3.99.902_7 # pkg_delete linux-XFree86-libs-4.3.99.902_7 > ===>>> The x11/linux-XFree86-libs port has been deleted: Has expired: > superseeded by linux-xorg-libs port > ===>>> Aborting update > www# > www# whereis linux-XFree86-libs > linux-XFree86-libs: > www# WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 15:57:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5654916A415 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:57:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beni@brinckman.info) Received: from sun.schedom-europe.net (sun.schedom-europe.net [193.109.184.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8803643CA4 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:57:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beni@brinckman.info) Received: (qmail 15583 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2006 16:16:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (83.101.7.37) by sun.schedom-europe.net with SMTP; 16 Dec 2006 16:16:33 -0000 From: Beni To: User Questions Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:56:54 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200612161315.03256.beni@brinckman.info> <20061216084635.2EE9.GERARD@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20061216084635.2EE9.GERARD@seibercom.net> X-Face: %*c?V7%A[c.}s2rI*TaRWm-[I-, ZLpBKmmC-@)J}KGbr)=a, TsXSA=:ArC(<=?utf-8?q?v=5C/=5F=25BaB=24K=0A=09=24=60E=7D6=7EyjIqu/SN=3A=24Pb=7DGngR+8=3D?= =?utf-8?q?dE=60?=)V~48zl6) =?utf-8?q?BhEtfQ2=3D=7ChScx=3Frn30d!QMd=3F=2E=60/hR!l+=0A=09x?=(]+zXesMf?'W[>46aPKMAAwd7eT{X_O9besb[u]'Y(DAe MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612161656.55355.beni@brinckman.info> Subject: Re: removing x11/linux-XFree86-libs ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:57:07 -0000 On Saturday 16 December 2006 14:46, gerard@seibercom.net wrote: > On Saturday December 16, 2006 at 07:15:02 (AM) Beni wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I noticed that x11/linux-XFree86-libs has been replaced by > > x11/linux-xorg-libs. I can deinstall and reinstall the linux-xorg-libs > > but how do I remove the installed port linux-XFree86-libs ? Portmaster > > aborts updating my ports with the following error and I can't go into the > > original linux-XFree86-libs portsdirectory cause it doesn't exist any > > more... So, how do I remove this XFree86 thing (which was normally > > installed also from ports) ? > > > > ... > > ===>>> Checking installed port: libwpd-0.8.7 > > ===>>> Checking installed port: libxine-1.1.3 > > ===>>> Checking installed port: libxml2-2.6.26 > > ===>>> Checking installed port: libxslt-1.1.17 > > ===>>> Checking installed port: linc-1.0.3_6 > > ===>>> Checking installed port: linux-XFree86-libs-4.3.99.902_7 > > > > ===>>> The x11/linux-XFree86-libs port has been deleted: Has expired: > > superseeded by linux-xorg-libs port > > ===>>> Aborting update > > www# > > > > www# whereis linux-XFree86-libs > > linux-XFree86-libs: > > www# > > > > Thanks, > > Beni. > > You could try the following. First make sure you have a completely up to > date ports tree. > > pkgdb -Fv > > See if that reports and problems and hopefully fixes them. > > Next run: > > portmanager -u -l -y > > That should correct the remaining problems.. > > Check the log file created: /var/log/portmanager.log to see if there are > any errors reported. Plus, when portmanager terminates, it will show > what, if any, programs it could not handle. Thanks Gerard for the help. A "portmanager -u -l -y" updated something completely else (php5) but didn't show any other errors in the log : "portmanager 0.4.1_7 INFO: all ports are up to date" All should be fixed now. Got a hint from Boris Samodorov too : # pkg_delete linux-XFree86-libs-4.3.99.902_7 Didn't know that pkg_delete worked for ports, thought it was just for packages. Had to deinstall linux-sun-jdk14 first, but the reinstall used already the new linux-xorg-libs. So all is back on track now. Thanks for the help ! Beni. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 16:05:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98CBE16A412; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:05:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shigeaki@se.hiroshima-u.ac.jp) Received: from condor.se.hiroshima-u.ac.jp (condor.se.hiroshima-u.ac.jp [133.41.33.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1083143CAF; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:05:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shigeaki@se.hiroshima-u.ac.jp) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.se.hiroshima-u.ac.jp [127.0.0.1]) by condor.se.hiroshima-u.ac.jp with ESMTP id kBGG5uCf032013; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 01:05:56 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <45841980.5090100@se.hiroshima-u.ac.jp> Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 01:06:24 +0900 From: Shigeaki Tagashira User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Palle Girgensohn References: <92F17ADAEC575CF1EDBE870C@rambutan.pingpong.net> In-Reply-To: <92F17ADAEC575CF1EDBE870C@rambutan.pingpong.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (condor.se.hiroshima-u.ac.jp [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 17 Dec 2006 01:05:57 +0900 (JST) Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org, obrien@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: if_nfe on nVidia chipset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:05:59 -0000 I have the same one. And if_nfe works well on it, in both FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE and 7-CURRENT. Please try to initialize if_nfe using ifconfig command; # ifconfig nfe1 down; ifconfig nfe1 up --- S. Tagashira Palle Girgensohn wrote: > Hi! Sorry for the cross post, I'd love to know if I can get this working > or not. > > Regards, > Palle > > ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- > Date: tisdag, december 12, 2006 18.52.35 +0100 > From: Palle Girgensohn > To: hardware@freebsd.org > Subject: if_nfe on Asus M2N-SLI deluxe? > > Hi! > > Does anybody know if if_nfe should work on the above motherboard? I snached > the patch for FreeBSD-6.2 from > and > tried it. The kernel and ifconfig seems happy, but it does not work; > ifconfig reports "active" but ifconfig reports: > > nfe0: flags=8802 mtu 1500 > options=1b > ether 00:17:31:86:aa:31 > media: Ethernet autoselect (none) > status: no carrier > nfe1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=1b > inet6 fe80::217:31ff:fe86:b4c6%nfe1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 > inet 192.168.1.191 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 > ether 00:17:31:86:b4:c6 > media: Ethernet autoselect (none) > status: active > lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 > scopeid 0x5 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > The media part of nfe1 looks bad, eh? > > Is it supposed to work? How can I help to get it working? > > FreeBSD 6.2-stable, around RC1. Enclosed is a dmesg. Anything else needed? > > /Palle > > > > ---------- End Forwarded Message ---------- > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > if_nfe on Asus M2N-SLI deluxe? > From: > Palle Girgensohn > Date: > Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:52:35 +0100 > To: > hardware@freebsd.org > > To: > hardware@freebsd.org > CC: > obrien@freebsd.org > > > Hi! > > Does anybody know if if_nfe should work on the above motherboard? I snached > the patch for FreeBSD-6.2 from > and > tried it. The kernel and ifconfig seems happy, but it does not work; > ifconfig reports "active" but ifconfig reports: > > nfe0: flags=8802 mtu 1500 > options=1b > ether 00:17:31:86:aa:31 > media: Ethernet autoselect (none) > status: no carrier > nfe1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=1b > inet6 fe80::217:31ff:fe86:b4c6%nfe1 prefixlen 64 scopeid > 0x4 inet 192.168.1.191 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 > ether 00:17:31:86:b4:c6 > media: Ethernet autoselect (none) > status: active > lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 > scopeid 0x5 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > The media part of nfe1 looks bad, eh? > > Is it supposed to work? How can I help to get it working? > > FreeBSD 6.2-stable, around RC1. Enclosed is a dmesg. Anything else needed? > > /Palle > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project. > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. > FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Wed Nov 29 11:57:06 CET 2006 > girgen@rambutan.pingpong.net:/usr/obj/.a/banan/usr/src/sys/WORKSTATION > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3500+ (2210.20-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x40ff2 Stepping = 2 > Features=0x78bfbff > Features2=0x2001 > AMD Features=0xea500800 > AMD Features2=0x1d,,CR8> > real memory = 2146369536 (2046 MB) > avail memory = 2091245568 (1994 MB) > ACPI APIC Table: > ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard > acpi0: on motherboard > acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR > acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR > acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR > acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR > acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR > acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR > Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 > acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 > cpu0: on acpi0 > acpi_button0: on acpi0 > pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 > pci0: on pcib0 > pci0: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) > isab0: at device 1.0 on pci0 > isa0: on isab0 > pci0: at device 1.1 (no driver attached) > pci0: at device 1.2 (no driver attached) > ohci0: mem 0xfe02f000-0xfe02ffff irq 21 at device 2.0 on pci0 > ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support > usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting > usb0: on ohci0 > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > uhub0: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub0: 10 ports with 10 removable, self powered > ehci0: mem 0xfe02e000-0xfe02e0ff irq 22 at device 2.1 on pci0 > ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb1: EHCI version 1.0 > usb1: companion controller, 10 ports each: usb0 > usb1: on ehci0 > usb1: USB revision 2.0 > uhub1: nVidia EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub1: 10 ports with 10 removable, self powered > atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xf400-0xf40f at device 4.0 on pci0 > ata0: on atapci0 > ata1: on atapci0 > atapci1: port 0x9f0-0x9f7,0xbf0-0xbf3,0x970-0x977,0xb70-0xb73,0xe000-0xe00f mem 0xfe02d000-0xfe02dfff irq 23 at device 5.0 on pci0 > ata2: on atapci1 > ata3: on atapci1 > atapci2: port 0x9e0-0x9e7,0xbe0-0xbe3,0x960-0x967,0xb60-0xb63,0xcc00-0xcc0f mem 0xfe02c000-0xfe02cfff irq 20 at device 5.1 on pci0 > ata4: on atapci2 > ata5: on atapci2 > atapci3: port 0xc800-0xc807,0xc400-0xc403,0xc000-0xc007,0xbc00-0xbc03,0xb800-0xb80f mem 0xfe02b000-0xfe02bfff irq 21 at device 5.2 on pci0 > ata6: on atapci3 > ata7: on atapci3 > pcib1: at device 6.0 on pci0 > pci1: on pcib1 > fxp0: port 0xac00-0xac1f mem 0xfdeff000-0xfdefffff,0xfdc00000-0xfdcfffff irq 16 at device 6.0 on pci1 > miibus0: on fxp0 > inphy0: on miibus0 > inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > fxp0: Ethernet address: 00:a0:c9:ce:11:26 > fwohci0: mem 0xfddff000-0xfddff7ff,0xfddf8000-0xfddfbfff irq 19 at device 11.0 on pci1 > fwohci0: OHCI version 1.10 (ROM=1) > fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 4. > fwohci0: EUI64 00:11:d8:00:00:c8:2b:85 > fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 2 ports. > fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. > firewire0: on fwohci0 > fwe0: on firewire0 > if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:11:d8:c8:2b:85 > fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:11:d8:c8:2b:85 > fwe0: if_start running deferred for Giant > sbp0: on firewire0 > fwohci0: Initiate bus reset > fwohci0: node_id=0xc800ffc0, gen=1, CYCLEMASTER mode > firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop <= 0, cable IRM = 0 (me) > firewire0: bus manager 0 (me) > pci0: at device 6.1 (no driver attached) > nfe0: port 0xb400-0xb407 mem 0xfe02a000-0xfe02afff,0xfe029000-0xfe0290ff,0xfe028000-0xfe02800f irq 23 at device 8.0 on pci0 > miibus1: on nfe0 > e1000phy0: on miibus1 > e1000phy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto > nfe0: Ethernet address: 00:17:31:86:aa:31 > nfe1: port 0xb000-0xb007 mem 0xfe027000-0xfe027fff,0xfe026000-0xfe0260ff,0xfe025000-0xfe02500f irq 20 at device 9.0 on pci0 > miibus2: on nfe1 > e1000phy1: on miibus2 > e1000phy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto > nfe1: Ethernet address: 00:17:31:86:b4:c6 > pcib2: at device 10.0 on pci0 > pci2: on pcib2 > pcib3: at device 11.0 on pci0 > pci3: on pcib3 > pcib4: at device 12.0 on pci0 > pci4: on pcib4 > pcib5: at device 13.0 on pci0 > pci5: on pcib5 > pcib6: at device 14.0 on pci0 > pci6: on pcib6 > atapci4: port 0x9c00-0x9c07,0x9800-0x9803,0x9400-0x9407,0x9000-0x9003,0x8c00-0x8c0f mem 0xfdafe000-0xfdafffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci6 > atapci4: AHCI Version 01.00 controller with 2 ports detected > ata8: on atapci4 > ata9: on atapci4 > ata10: on atapci4 > pcib7: at device 15.0 on pci0 > pci7: on pcib7 > nvidia0: mem 0xfa000000-0xfaffffff,0xe0000000-0xefffffff,0xfb000000-0xfbffffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci7 > nvidia0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > acpi_tz0: on acpi0 > fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 > fdc0: [FAST] > sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 > sio0: type 16550A > ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on acpi0 > ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode > ppbus0: on ppc0 > ppi0: on ppbus0 > lpt0: on ppbus0 > lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > pmtimer0 on isa0 > orm0: at iomem 0xd0000-0xd3fff,0xd4000-0xd67ff on isa0 > atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 > atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > kbd0 at atkbd0 > atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > sio1: port may not be enabled > vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 > ukbd0: Logitech HID compliant keyboard, rev 1.10/1.80, addr 2, iclass 3/1 > kbd1 at ukbd0 > uhid0: Logitech HID compliant keyboard, rev 1.10/1.80, addr 2, iclass 3/1 > ums0: Logitech USB-PS/2 Optical Mouse, rev 2.00/18.00, addr 3, iclass 3/1 > ums0: 6 buttons and Z dir. > Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2210201999 Hz quality 800 > Timecounters tick every 0.801 msec > ipfw2 (+ipv6) initialized, divert loadable, rule-based forwarding disabled, default to accept, logging disabled > ad0: 152627MB at ata0-master UDMA100 > acd0: DVDR at ata0-slave UDMA66 > cd0 at ata0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 > cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device > cd0: 66.000MB/s transfers > cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hardware-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 16:26:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F05E16A403 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:26:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from regulus.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-244.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.244]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6637843CA0 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:26:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from athena.dfwlp.com (athena.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.83]) (authenticated bits=0) by regulus.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBGGQq6P039382 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:26:52 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:26:51 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612161026.51929.freebsd@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on regulus.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: Need explaination for `date` command ! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:26:59 -0000 On Saturday 16 December 2006 06:18, Supote Leelasuppakorn wrote: > Hi lists, > > I am currently using FreeBSD-6.1 for a while. I am in Thailand so > my time zone is GMT+7. Let say the time is 3:00 PM in Thailand. > What I would like to know is > > 1. What is the output of `date` command I should get ? > 2. What is the output of `date -u` command I should get ? > > TIA > > > ------------------------------------ > Pote :-) > ------------------------------------ > well, mine outputs like this: [jhorne@athena ~]$ date Sat Dec 16 10:23:44 CST 2006 [jhorne@athena ~]$ date -u Sat Dec 16 16:23:46 UTC 2006 (i am GMT-6, US Central Time). as you can see, the second run with the -u, added my 6 hours back on again. so, if you are GMT+7, i would assume that when you give the -u, you would show a time 7 hours earlier. hth, jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 16:38:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A6C916A40F for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:38:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.robillard@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA5943CBB for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:38:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.robillard@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so999673uge for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 08:38:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cBoHG8ZPbv/G/kTytHDkfs7qpCRUQ9CEmBubB/9WCMNmxQ3QJKg9sGYxPPCG02A3w4rBsLA43ou4kI31NzQoOteS4GvaYwl+x5a6lVbIYJS09c/JQGPOdfdBdCkYUffvQ58cqWRuuoxXgNREIvjozXsg83G5Epe7f8bu84A4oMU= Received: by 10.66.216.20 with SMTP id o20mr1936614ugg.1166287082827; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 08:38:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.106.17 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 08:38:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <226ae0c60612160838rbcd7939v7df6ccec6e28a16f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:38:02 -0500 From: "David Robillard" To: "Phillip Upchurch" In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20061215170803.04e33490@houston.oilfield.slb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <226ae0c60612150720w2ca49b23qd3c2784342883e90@mail.gmail.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20061215170803.04e33490@houston.oilfield.slb.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Legato Client for freeBSD. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:38:13 -0000 Hi Phillip, > Appreciate your help. Sure, no problem :) If you do try it out, I'd like to know if it actually works ! And if it doesn't, well, I've been thinking of other ways you could solve your problem. One is to enable FreeBSD's Linux Compatibility and use Letgato's Linux client (I suppose they have one?) Another way of doing would be to either rsync, dump, cpio or tar your data over to another Legato supported platform and then backup that one. Something like this works great once you've setup ssh keys without passphrases: dump -0uaL -f - / | ssh login@other-legato-supported-machine "gzip -9 > /path/to/backup/directory/root.dump" Finally, I also found those: http://ftp8.ua.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/FreeBSD-current/commerce/networking/legato/ (no idea if it's any good?) http://www.freebsd.uwaterloo.ca/twiki/bin/view/Freebsd/LegatoNetworker (looks good, but does it work?) Good luck! DA+ On 12/15/06, Phillip Upchurch wrote: > > > David - > > No - as a matter of fact - > > I haven't tried > ftp://ftp.legato.com/pub/Unsupported/FreeBSD_Client > > That would be doing things the easy way - dont ya think ? ;-) > > Appreciate your help. > > Thanks David > Phillip -- David Robillard UNIX systems administrator & Oracle DBA CISSP, RHCE & Sun Certified Security Administrator Montreal: +1 514 966 0122 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 16:38:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DEF916A500 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:38:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fk@zepher.dyndns.org) Received: from rosy.dyndns.org (softbank220038116012.bbtec.net [220.38.116.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6E1743CBA for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:38:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fk@zepher.dyndns.org) Received: (qmail 78364 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2006 16:25:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Dec 2006 16:25:05 -0000 To: fk@zepher.dyndns.org In-Reply-To: <20061216224959X.fk@zepher.dyndns.org> References: <457b3f3a.e4Sf+YRQsI6sLl6z%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20061210152756J.fk@zepher.dyndns.org> <20061216224959X.fk@zepher.dyndns.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.2 on Emacs 19.34 / Mule 2.3 (SUETSUMUHANA) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20061217012504P.fk@zepher.dyndns.org> Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 01:25:04 +0900 From: FK X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 152 Cc: perryh@pluto.rain.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How can I fix "Cannot find file system superblock" problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:38:24 -0000 Dear listers, Hopefully this may help. To back up the necessary data, all I have to do is $tar -cvzf fk.backup.tgz /usr/home/fk/ assuming that the broken partition /dev/da0s2 is mounted on /, which means all data I need to back up is under /usr/home/fk/. Note: /usr/home/fk/ has lots of files including sub-directories. The data size is about 15MB (6MB after gzip-ped). It is almost precise, since I had had this kind of trouble a few times, I have had a custom to collect precious data in a single place and back up my data occasionally. But ... I will lose one-month-long-worthing data, which is horrible since I have modified a lot of data for the time..... Do I have any practical ways to back up the data without mounting it, given that I could not fix the superblock? -- FK. From: FK Subject: Re: How can I fix "Cannot find file system superblock" problem? Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:49:59 +0900 Message-ID: <20061216224959X.fk@zepher.dyndns.org> fk> Dear all, fk> fk> Still I can not solove the problem. fk> Maybe it is high time to give up, fk> but before that I wonder, fk> as everybody who has had this kind of trouble does, fk> I could mount it read-only and fk> back up my own data. fk> The data is too precious for me to lose... fk> fk> Thank you for your support. fk> fk> -- fk> FK. fk> fk> From: FK fk> Subject: Re: How can I fix "Cannot find file system superblock" problem? fk> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:27:56 +0900 fk> Message-ID: <20061210152756J.fk@zepher.dyndns.org> fk> fk> fk> Dear all members, fk> fk> fk> fk> From: perryh@pluto.rain.com fk> fk> Subject: Re: How can I fix "Cannot find file system superblock" problem? fk> fk> Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 14:56:58 -0800 fk> fk> Message-ID: <457b3f3a.e4Sf+YRQsI6sLl6z%perryh@pluto.rain.com> fk> fk> fk> fk> perryh> > #diff -s sb1 sb2 fk> fk> perryh> > Files sb1 and sb2 are identical fk> fk> perryh> > #diff -s sb1 sb3 fk> fk> perryh> > Files sb1 and sb3 are identical fk> fk> perryh> fk> fk> perryh> It might be worthwhile to check one of these identical "alternates" fk> fk> perryh> against the "real" superblock. (AFAIK only the first 512 bytes, or fk> fk> perryh> less, actually matter.) You might also post a dump of the first 512 fk> fk> perryh> bytes and see if anyone notices anything. fk> fk> fk> fk> Thank you for your reply. fk> fk> Following your suggestions, I tried these. fk> fk> fk> fk> #dd if=/dev/da0s2a skip=0 bs=512 count=16 of=sb0 fk> fk> 16+0 records in fk> fk> 16+0 records out fk> fk> 8192 bytes transferred in 0.011918 secs (687360 bytes/sec) fk> fk> fk> fk> #diff -s sb0 sb1 fk> fk> Binary files sb0 and sb1 differ fk> fk> fk> fk> Dump for the master superblock (the first 512 bytes only). fk> fk> #od -x sb0 fk> fk> 0000000 d440 10fa 9b10 09e1 9524 7b55 f334 153f fk> fk> 0000020 f190 0b4a 387c 5d46 1b94 14b0 ae10 0b19 fk> fk> 0000040 4e3c b446 b870 138f 7190 0ab7 ff52 75e6 fk> fk> 0000060 5dac 130e bbf0 0a8a 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> fk> 0000100 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> fk> 0000120 1d12 7b57 1a88 113f d610 0a84 a2be 064f fk> fk> 0000140 7eb8 1226 3290 0a44 9e3c 7b57 f870 0f9e fk> fk> 0000160 cb00 0932 cad0 7b57 1764 13e4 31d0 0ad4 fk> fk> 0000200 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 4bfa 7b58 fk> fk> 0000220 f54c 1243 41e0 0a4e f1a6 41f0 d97c 13ef fk> fk> 0000240 eb00 0ad7 cd24 7b58 d334 10a3 66d0 09c8 fk> fk> 0000260 be3c 6d39 7870 15ab d1b0 0b6f 52be 7b59 fk> fk> 0000300 3eb8 0fe3 4600 0973 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> fk> 0000320 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> fk> 0000340 007c 7b5a 3b94 1288 2820 0a65 f890 3fda fk> fk> 0000360 1440 15e3 b780 0b82 81a6 7b5a 197c 10e8 fk> fk> 0000400 ed10 09da 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> fk> 0000420 2f66 7b5b 1658 138d ed60 0ab5 0000 0000 fk> fk> 0000440 0000 0000 0000 0000 b090 7b5b f440 11ec fk> fk> 0000460 2d70 0a30 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> fk> 0000500 31ba 7b5c d228 104c cff0 09ad 5e4e 7b5c fk> fk> 0000520 f11c 1491 98e0 0b0f ff52 78a4 5dac 11c6 fk> fk> 0000540 18f0 0a23 e3e8 7b5c 5ca0 13d1 c3d0 0acd fk> fk> 0000560 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 6512 7b5d fk> fk> 0000600 3a88 1231 d3e0 0a47 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> fk> 0000620 0000 0000 e63c 7b5d 1870 1091 a8d0 09c1 fk> fk> 0000640 9abe 514e 5eb8 1471 9230 0b04 0000 0000 fk> fk> 0000660 0000 0000 0000 0000 93fa 7b5e 154c 1336 fk> fk> 0000700 5920 0a98 2ae4 26ef 9010 14b5 c730 0b1b fk> fk> 0000720 1524 7b5f f334 1195 8930 0a12 41ba 7b5f fk> fk> 0000740 1228 15db daa0 0b7f 9abe 7b5f 5eb8 10d5 fk> fk> 0000760 8f10 09d4 c2e4 7b5f f010 143a d4a0 0af1 fk> fk> fk> fk> Dump for one of alternative superblock (the first 512 bytes only). fk> fk> #od -x sb1 fk> fk> 0000000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0028 0000 0030 0000 fk> fk> 0000020 0038 0000 0bb8 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> fk> 0000040 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0033 0000 fk> fk> 0000060 4000 0000 0800 0000 0008 0000 0008 0000 fk> fk> 0000100 0000 0000 0000 0000 c000 ffff f800 ffff fk> fk> 0000120 000e 0000 000b 0000 0008 0000 0800 0000 fk> fk> 0000140 0003 0000 0002 0000 0800 0000 0000 0000 fk> fk> 0000160 0000 0000 0800 0000 0040 0000 0000 0000 fk> fk> 0000200 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> fk> 0000220 bf56 444b a5bf c858 0000 0000 0800 0000 fk> fk> 0000240 4000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> fk> 0000260 0000 0000 0000 0000 5c00 0000 6f88 0001 fk> fk> 0000300 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> fk> 0000320 0100 8000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> fk> 0000340 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 fk> fk> * fk> fk> 0001520 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 4000 0000 fk> fk> fk> fk> fk> fk> Does my superblock have anything wrong? fk> fk> fk> fk> This dump analysis is beyond my tecknical knowledge. fk> fk> So Thanks a lot for your help! fk> fk> fk> fk> -- fk> fk> FK. fk> fk> _______________________________________________ fk> fk> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list fk> fk> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions fk> fk> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" fk> _______________________________________________ fk> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list fk> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions fk> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 17:01:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11D916A403 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 17:01:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jurjenm@stack.nl) Received: from mx1.stack.nl (meestal.stack.nl [131.155.140.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9F743CA4 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 17:01:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jurjenm@stack.nl) Received: by mx1.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 65534) id DDAE24B2EB; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:01:55 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-DCC: CTc-dcc2: snail.stack.nl 1031; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.5 (2006-08-29) on snail.stack.nl X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, J_CHICKENPOX_32 autolearn=no version=3.1.5 X-Spam-Relay-Country: NL Received: from snhmib (a62-251-106-27.adsl.xs4all.nl [62.251.106.27]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2654B02F for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:01:52 +0100 (CET) Received: by snhmib (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:01:23 +0100 From: "Jurjen Middendorp" Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:01:23 +0100 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20061216170123.GA962@jurjenm.stack.nl> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: ipfw rules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 17:01:58 -0000 I posted this to the freebsd-security list, but i believe that is not the right list to this question (sorry! this is my first message to the freebsd mailing-lists). I hope this is the right list! :) anyway: I tried making a firewall for my laptop..but i'm not sure if i forgot anything. And things can always be done better :) I'm not sure what i should've put under incoming connections... what i have put there now is pretty useless because the default is to deny, but should i accept any incoming connections that don't match the dynamic rules? I just want to be able to surf the internet without too much trouble and send e-mail and pretty much deny everything else. If someone would have the time to have a quick look at this to see if there's anything wrong with it i would really appreciate it! Bye, jurjen. ps. here is my ruleset: #!/bin/sh ipfw -q flush cmd="ipfw -q add" ks="keep-state" oif="ath0" #setup the loopback $cmd 001 allow all from any to any via lo0 $cmd 002 deny all from any to 127.0.0.0/8 $cmd 003 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any #check state of incoming packets $cmd 010 check-state #### # Outgoing #allow outgoing connections to internetsites, ssh sites # webservers and stack. (keep-state) #to stack (student computer thing... e-mail, irc, ssh stuff) $cmd 020 allow all from me to 131.155.140.141/16 via $oif $ks #allow ssh $cmd 021 allow all from me to any 22 out via $oif setup $ks #internet sites: $cmd 032 allow tcp from me to any 80 out via $oif setup $ks #https $cmd 033 allow tcp from me to any 443 out via $oif setup $ks #gopher $cmd 034 allow tcp from me to any 70 out via $oif setup $ks #other e-mail #pop $cmd 040 allow tcp from me to any 110 out via $oif setup $ks #imap $cmd 041 allow tcp from me to any 143 out via $oif setup $ks #allow dns queries $cmd 050 allow udp from me to any 53 out via $oif $ks #allow ntp (?) queries $cmd 051 allow udp from me to any 123 out via $oif $ks #i can send icmp myself $cmd 060 allow icmp from me to any out via $oif $ks #but others can't $cmd 061 deny icmp from any to me # #root can do anything $cmd 070 allow tcp from me to any out via $oif setup $ks uid root #log other outgoing packets $cmd 071 deny log all from any to any out via $oif #### # Incoming #The default is that all other connections will be blocked anyway, but # the more stuff i put in here, the less stuff will get logged #deny incoming to private networks $cmd 100 deny all from 192.168.0.0/16 to any in via $oif #RFC 1918 $cmd 101 deny all from 172.16.0.0/16 to any in via $oif #RFC 1918 $cmd 105 deny all from 169.254.0.0/16 to any in via $oif #DHCP auto $cmd 106 deny all from 192.0.2.0/24 to any in via $oif #reserved $cmd 108 deny all from 192.168.0.0/16 to any in via $oif #D & E class # multicast #block smb stuff $cmd 120 deny tcp from any to me 137 in via $oif $cmd 121 deny tcp from any to me 138 in via $oif $cmd 122 deny tcp from any to me 139 in via $oif #log ACK packets that did'nt match the dynamic ruleset $cmd 130 deny log all from any to any established in via $oif #Now log some stuff in case i did something wrong $cmd 999 deny log any to me From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 17:46:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B817016A412 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 17:46:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306E643CAA for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 17:46:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avatar4d@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so493464nzh for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 09:46:50 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=b6NZDX3GMKzdiWqLcOyoQgwWIi4Pi0tMxkeMBGqzC+nZOZhOz6z2cz0rP0Iyw2LchAd73QxHLe35vUaZjWIoFSkNKL/t5YNJ5fFIyEXa40bG/DyITFdt1geFPG8X1zuhbhj4ADhnolmZaj4XO0UUHn98ze0pVZelf1v7D5veGV0= Received: by 10.65.232.19 with SMTP id j19mr2467685qbr.1166291210371; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 09:46:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.75.14 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 09:46:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <17489c7a0612160946t1b7e8459l12f923f6893493f8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:46:50 -0500 From: "Chad Gross" To: "Olivier Regnier" In-Reply-To: <20061216151624.d08cc32a.oregnier@ixsys.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061216151624.d08cc32a.oregnier@ixsys.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New style with Fluxbox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 17:46:51 -0000 On 12/16/06, Olivier Regnier wrote: > > Hello, > > Yesterday, i installed by the ports, fluxbox version 0.1.14_2 on my laptop > with FreeBSD 6.1. I downloaded a new style called Mysta with theses files: > > - theme.cfg > - pixmaps (button.xpm, menu.xpm and toolbar.xpm) > > Theses files are in /usr/X11R6/share/fluxbox/styles . The permissions are > ok but i don't see my new theme in Fluxbox menu called Styles. > > Perhaps, i forgot to install a packages, i don't know what happened. > > Can you help me please ? > > Thanks in advance. > > Olivier Regnier > > _______________________________________________ Did you put theme.cfg and the pixmaps into a folder called Mysta in /usr/X11R6/share/fluxbox/styles (e.g. /usr/X11R6/share/fluxbox/styles/Mysta/)? Also have you restarted Fluxbox or reloaded the config from the fluxbox menu? Chad From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 18:21:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971CB16A40F for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:21:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D7043CA2 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:21:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GveAS-0004LU-E5 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 13:21:52 -0500 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost.localnet.local [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kBGIOFUZ005740 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:24:15 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id kBGIOEkh005739 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:24:14 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:24:14 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612161224.14708.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79b006b96c0c06f22a545d7f137c5e8402350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: xorg on a headless, mouseless, keyboardless box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:21:53 -0000 Hi, I need to run X ... or in some way gain access to the display output on a remote box that has neither mouse, keyboard, or console. Is this even possible? I've been looking at the handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x-xdm.html#AEN6864 But it doesn't jump out at me how I should make this work. I've edited /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm/xdm-config and Xaccess to listen for the connection, but when I run xdm on the remote box it fails with "No core pointer" So I followed the limited instructions on the X wiki and added Section ServerFlags option "AllowMouseOpenFail" EndSection But now I get Fatal error: no screens found. Is it even possible to have the remote headless box host an X session? thanks, lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 18:31:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E481916A415 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:31:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC6143CA4 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:31:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1016344uge for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:31:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=glsreOoQl0Z4c4sRdqfPjDuTWrYgeJdV79qyh0ZpsR1lonUzKRokXeB5AxXn62QpmScaJ0iolSHW6/AP2J6Z7BiFfMgt5PFX/BGvQDpaEspX3zJi8+4vwSbJvFQW3kFkkB4NsQRFNREYzjbPbD4hHsTdig459ffGI3feR4N4Od8= Received: by 10.78.201.15 with SMTP id y15mr1442611huf.1166293863599; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:31:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.167.16 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:31:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 21:31:03 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: "Olivier Regnier" In-Reply-To: <20061216151624.d08cc32a.oregnier@ixsys.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061216151624.d08cc32a.oregnier@ixsys.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 942472eb74df8e0a Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New style with Fluxbox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:31:06 -0000 On 12/16/06, Olivier Regnier wrote: > Hello, > > Yesterday, i installed by the ports, fluxbox version 0.1.14_2 Please try the newer version, x11-wm/fluxbox-devel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 18:34:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD7B16A407 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:34:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C995943CA5 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:34:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1016752uge for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:34:04 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=B8yKdacBsBFPI/jffCBqGdwYq0AuysJt5xB7Fd0ZkwXRIIJQEBvXcQUMk+r5C7hnlF71X2Vb29hTtpvNTk6OxWQ8oXalRGrLFkL/BYzaXb68tG2XNoYMYZ3EnlBFTZbbXLV2+IFCISv5VVxfub3dT0RBiU9Z5Fj6hrV17SzGpeY= Received: by 10.78.149.15 with SMTP id w15mr1430740hud.1166294044228; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:34:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.167.16 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:34:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 21:34:04 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: Lane In-Reply-To: <200612161224.14708.lane@joeandlane.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200612161224.14708.lane@joeandlane.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7b4ce656cd1d738a Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: xorg on a headless, mouseless, keyboardless box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:34:06 -0000 On 12/16/06, Lane wrote: > Hi, > > I need to run X ... or in some way gain access to > the display output on a remote box that has neither > mouse, keyboard, or console. Can you tell us what you really need? Try "ssh -X user@box" and running gui apps or even startx there. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 19:06:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C3116A538 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 19:06:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from funicorn@laposte.net) Received: from laposte.net (dfd234.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.23.133.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7726343CB8 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 19:06:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from funicorn@laposte.net) Message-ID: <001301c7214c$d2b2c1f0$0726a9cc@staleczka> From: "Gwendolyn Burton" To: "freebsd-questions" Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 20:00:23 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="windows-1250"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2963 Subject: Powerhouse Investment 0pportunity? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 19:06:47 -0000 Under The Radar Stox. Microcap Profile Preparing To Launch! pick of the week - build a position today _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Breaking News Apparel Manufacturing Associates, Inc. investor news breaks out Symbol OTC : APPM Current Price : $0.06 The Bull is Back: SmallCap Profile Huge news expected out on APPM, get in before the wire, We're taking it all the way to $1.00 Hidden Winners St0ck Alert Watch it like a hawk and get in before the rush Is The Time Right For This SmallCap? About the Company We are a multifaceted management/development company concentrating on the world of Fashion and Music. Our affiliates and partners offer 4 decades of experience and recognized success in their respective fields. With offices in New York City, Miami and Zurich, we are in touch with the pulse of the "fashion forward". _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Trading 0ppprtunity For You Market Movers and Shakers Diamond in The Rough Equity Report From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 19:23:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7CDC16A412 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 19:23:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lonnie@outstep.com) Received: from mail.outstep.com (D2095.servadmin.com [12.158.188.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A45C43CBB for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 19:22:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lonnie@outstep.com) Received: (qmail 22628 invoked by uid 511); 16 Dec 2006 13:23:53 -0600 Received: from 68.32.113.56 by mail.outstep.com (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.87/2106. spamassassin: 3.1.3. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(68.32.113.56):SA:0(1.5/5.0):. Processed in 3.314087 secs); 16 Dec 2006 19:23:53 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 X-Spam-Level: + X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: lonnie@outstep.com via mail.outstep.com X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(68.32.113.56):SA:0(1.5/5.0):. Processed in 3.314087 secs Process 22620) Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.11?) (lonnie@outstep.com@68.32.113.56) by mail.outstep.com with SMTP; 16 Dec 2006 13:23:49 -0600 Message-ID: <4584478B.1040200@outstep.com> Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:22:51 -0500 From: Lonnie Cumberland User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Pantyukhin References: <200612161224.14708.lane@joeandlane.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Lane , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: xorg on a headless, mouseless, keyboardless box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 19:23:11 -0000 Alternately you can also run an NX server and NX client or even TightVNC to access GDM, KDM, or XDM remotely as well. Cheers, Lonnie Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 12/16/06, Lane wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I need to run X ... or in some way gain access to >> the display output on a remote box that has neither >> mouse, keyboard, or console. > > > Can you tell us what you really need? > > Try "ssh -X user@box" and running gui apps or > even startx there. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Thanks and have a good day, Lonnie T. Cumberland OutStep Technologies Incorporated Email: Lonnie@outstep.com Lonnie_Cumberland@yahoo.com "Open Source...... opening the doors for the future in the world of today...." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 19:42:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 103FD16A416 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 19:42:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7013C43F36 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 19:37:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1024788uge for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:37:41 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Gv1D9g5uf7mp5hvA+9mJ9YROj9p+Gkd3q+A7OgSF9txpPjZ1TJF7sMlHQt/E1fxFX+qQWGicfO7PLRUZxibc6hjl4kF0Fl92r6PZQZI+zcg4fxdOqivD+kA3UN5rxEQ8AO0cK1dLMgwmOViAjw15ey6P9UhbvWPUJgmsEDmOyj4= Received: by 10.78.171.13 with SMTP id t13mr685411hue.1166297860816; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:37:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.149.18 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:37:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <340a29540612161137j69850888t9dcffa9f7cd04e47@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:37:40 -0700 From: "Andrew Falanga" To: Lane , freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <200612081205.10243.lane@joeandlane.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <340a29540612080921i7d202e4dn7f8378c5341aeca2@mail.gmail.com> <200612081205.10243.lane@joeandlane.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: compilation problems with some code from Linux X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 19:42:03 -0000 On 12/8/06, Lane wrote: > > On Friday 08 December 2006 11:21, Andrew Falanga wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to port some code from Linux to FreeBSD and I've got an issue > > that revolves around something I've never dealt with before. The code > > includes the following header: > > > > #include > > > > Apparently, program is attempting to make use of the xucred structure > > defined in there, because the rest of the stuff in the file seems to be > for > > the kernel. However, when I try to compile, gcc continually bails with > the > > following error (among others), "NGROUPS was not declared in this > scope." > > The NGROUPS appears to be a macro, but it's not defined earlier > on. Would > > anyone here know where it's defined so I can include that file too? > > > > Secondly, I'm also getting errors because gcc can't find > > either. True enough, there isn't any vfs.h file in /usr/include/sys. > > Since this file is in Linux, what should I include for FreeBSD? > > > > Thanks, > > Andy > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Andy, > > I won't pretend to know exactly which header files correspond for your > port, > but in the past I've found some things that work for me: > > use > > locate vfs.h > > to find similar file names. On 6.x and 5.x I see that these are possible > candidates: > > /usr/X11R6/include/gnome-vfs-2.0/libgnomevfs/gnome-vfs.h > /usr/include/fs/devfs/devfs.h > /usr/include/sys/statvfs.h > /usr/local/include/af_vfs.h > /usr/src/sys/compat/svr4/svr4_statvfs.h > /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs.h > /usr/src/sys/nfs4client/nfs4_vfs.h > /usr/src/sys/sys/statvfs.h > > > But you'd have to compare the functions and structures defined in > sys/vfs.h on > linux to determine which is your best match up. > > There is /usr/ports/devel/mipsel-linux-kernel-headers/ which, according to > pkg-plist will install mipsel-linux/include/linux/vfs.h. That may be > exactly > what you need (although it may be overkill). Or it may be the LAST thing > you > need :) > > Sometimes a porter will simply create a patch file > in /usr/ports//files that will create a skeleton version of the > file which includes only the items you need. I've done this for > development > on my own system. > > As far as the NGROUP or other macros ... yikes! You may have to recreate > that > functionality entirely. > > I ran this: > > #!/bin/sh > for each in `locate .h | grep '\.h$'` > do > if [ -f $each ]; then > MYF=`cat $each | grep -i ngroups` > if [ "x$MYF" != "x" ]; then > echo $each : "$MYF" > fi > MYF="" > fi > done > > > It could probably be done more easily with sed and some elbow grease, but > it > does show NGROUPS defined here: > > /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xos.h : #define NGROUPS 16 > > and > > /usr/include/sys/param.h > > among other places. > > Good luck! > > lane > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Thank you everyone. I'm sorry that I didn't reply sooner. I did get this worked out, but unfortunately I don't remember the include file I had to use. I found in a different file than the one I was editing at the time I wrote this a nice comment explaining why the "#include " preprocessor directive was there. I found that function in a different include file for FreeBSD, changed the code and all was well. Thanks again. Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 19:55:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3849116A47C; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 19:55:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19F043F8E; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 19:47:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GvfVV-0007gO-JT; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:47:41 -0500 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost.localnet.local [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kBGJoD1N007305; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 13:50:13 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id kBGJoCml007304; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 13:50:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 13:50:12 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200612161224.14708.lane@joeandlane.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612161350.12657.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec7922a0b74175c13b379a7fc36443221c95350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: xorg on a headless, mouseless, keyboardless box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 19:55:11 -0000 On Saturday 16 December 2006 12:34, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 12/16/06, Lane wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I need to run X ... or in some way gain access to > > the display output on a remote box that has neither > > mouse, keyboard, or console. > > Can you tell us what you really need? > > Try "ssh -X user@box" and running gui apps or > even startx there. Andrew, "What I need" is a tall order :) What I'd like is an understanding of how X can be used for remote connections, such as is described here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x-xdm.html#AEN6864 I'd like to be able to work on the remote box in a graphical environment and not have to mount_nfs the devices I need to work with ... I'd also like to be able to start qemu on the remote machine with a Windows client and be able to invoke "safe" mode. I have a problem with a remote W2K image that is 4Gig compressed, and it is going to take 12 or more hours for me to get it copied to my local machine to fix it ... then another 12 hours to copy it back out there. There are probably some switches that I can use in qemu that I may discover over the next 12 hours, but an understanding of how X can help might actually save me some time. I've used this "ssh -X" that you mention. This works fine for "userland" programs, but in order to troubleshoot my particular issue I'd need to be logged in as root. When I try to "su" remotely to run the command I get: X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication. X connection to localhost:10.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown). I might try logging in locally as root and see what happens .... But in the long run I think that if I could understand how to grant myself an actual X session on the remote box then I could figure out how to do this and potentially other stuff. Thanks for any information you might share. lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 20:09:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65BC16A403 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 20:09:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oregnier@ixsys.org) Received: from 30.mail-out.ovh.net (30.mail-out.ovh.net [213.186.62.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC4A243CA7 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 20:08:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oregnier@ixsys.org) Received: (qmail 26055 invoked by uid 503); 16 Dec 2006 20:08:57 -0000 Received: (QMFILT: 1.0); 16 Dec 2006 20:08:57 -0000 Received: from b6.ovh.net (HELO mail239.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.56) by 30.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 16 Dec 2006 20:08:57 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue-out) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 16 Dec 2006 20:08:44 -0000 Received: from mac76-2-82-241-6-173.fbx.proxad.net (HELO unknown) (82.241.6.173) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 16 Dec 2006 20:08:42 -0000 Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 21:09:59 +0100 From: Olivier Regnier To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20061216210959.43bbb902.oregnier@ixsys.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20061216151624.d08cc32a.oregnier@ixsys.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.10 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Ovh-Remote: 82.241.6.173 (mac76-2-82-241-6-173.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|H 0.5/N Subject: Re: New style with Fluxbox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 20:09:40 -0000 I installed fluxbox-devel and it's ok. Im' happy :) Thank you ;) On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 21:31:03 +0300 "Andrew Pantyukhin" wrote: > On 12/16/06, Olivier Regnier wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Yesterday, i installed by the ports, fluxbox version 0.1.14_2 > > Please try the newer version, x11-wm/fluxbox-devel > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 22:55:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6FC16A403 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:55:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jtriende@wisc.edu) Received: from medmicro.wisc.edu (listserv.medmicro.wisc.edu [128.104.10.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6F743C9D for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:55:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jtriende@wisc.edu) Received: from [128.104.10.240] (unknown [128.104.10.240]) by medmicro.wisc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E312E30280A for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:54:59 -0600 (CST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: JAMES T RIENDEAU Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:54:58 -0600 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: Translate job number from atq to commands that will run X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:55:01 -0000 Does anybody know how I could translate the job # into the commands that will run from the output of the atq command? For example, here is my current atq: Date Owner Queue Job # Mon Dec 18 09:00:00 CST 2006 root c 34 Wed Dec 20 09:00:00 CST 2006 root c 35 Fri Dec 22 09:00:00 CST 2006 root c 36 Wed Dec 27 09:00:00 CST 2006 root c 37 Sat Dec 30 09:00:00 CST 2006 root c 38 Wed Jan 3 09:00:00 CST 2007 root c 39 Sat Jan 6 09:00:00 CST 2007 root c 40 Mon Dec 18 09:00:00 CST 2006 root c 41 Wed Dec 20 09:00:00 CST 2006 root c 42 Fri Dec 22 09:00:00 CST 2006 root c 43 Wed Dec 27 09:00:00 CST 2006 root c 44 Sat Dec 30 09:00:00 CST 2006 root c 45 Wed Jan 3 09:00:00 CST 2007 root c 46 Sat Jan 6 09:00:00 CST 2007 root c 47 I checked the /var/at/spool and /var/at/jobs, but it isn't obvious which job is scheduled to run when. Thank you, James Riendeau MMI Computer Support Technician 1300 University Ave Rm. 436, Dept. of MedMicro Madison, WI 53706 Phone: (608) 262-3351 Email: jtriende@wisc.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 23:11:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCBD16A416 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:11:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6C743CA1 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:11:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBGNBGHO022031 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:11:16 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.102] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id kBGNBGAf009761 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:11:16 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <200612161224.14708.lane@joeandlane.com> References: <200612161224.14708.lane@joeandlane.com> X-Gpgmail-State: !signed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Garrett Cooper Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:11:17 -0800 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2006.12.16.145933 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Subject: Re: xorg on a headless, mouseless, keyboardless box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:11:17 -0000 On Dec 16, 2006, at 10:24 AM, Lane wrote: > Hi, > > I need to run X ... or in some way gain access to the display > output on a > remote box that has neither mouse, keyboard, or console. > > Is this even possible? > > I've been looking at the handbook: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x- > xdm.html#AEN6864 > > But it doesn't jump out at me how I should make this work. > > I've edited /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm/xdm-config and Xaccess to listen > for the > connection, but when I run > > xdm > > on the remote box it fails with "No core pointer" > > So I followed the limited instructions on the X wiki and added > > Section ServerFlags > option "AllowMouseOpenFail" > EndSection > > But now I get > > Fatal error: no screens found. > > Is it even possible to have the remote headless box host an X session? > > thanks, > > lane Lane, Did you by chance remove keyboard / mouse support from your kernel? kldstat(8) may hold the answers, unless you have the mouse compiled directly into the kernel. Sounds like that may be your problem: . So you could try commenting out the mouse and keyboard references, just to see what happens.. Another solution that you may want to look into as an alternative to using xdm is X11 forwarding via SSH. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 23:23:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CCA916A403 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:23:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25DE43CA7 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:23:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GvisV-0008A1-Jp for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:23:39 -0500 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost.localnet.local [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kBGNQCHQ016598 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 17:26:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id kBGNQBTG016597 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 17:26:11 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 17:26:11 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200612161224.14708.lane@joeandlane.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612161726.11808.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79f66fb794f229ac490170b852254e7947350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Re: xorg on a headless, mouseless, keyboardless box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:23:41 -0000 On Saturday 16 December 2006 17:11, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Dec 16, 2006, at 10:24 AM, Lane wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I need to run X ... or in some way gain access to the display > > output on a > > remote box that has neither mouse, keyboard, or console. > > > > Is this even possible? > > > > I've been looking at the handbook: > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x- > > xdm.html#AEN6864 > > > > But it doesn't jump out at me how I should make this work. > > > > I've edited /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm/xdm-config and Xaccess to listen > > for the > > connection, but when I run > > > > xdm > > > > on the remote box it fails with "No core pointer" > > > > So I followed the limited instructions on the X wiki and added > > > > Section ServerFlags > > option "AllowMouseOpenFail" > > EndSection > > > > But now I get > > > > Fatal error: no screens found. > > > > Is it even possible to have the remote headless box host an X session? > > > > thanks, > > > > lane > > Lane, > Did you by chance remove keyboard / mouse support from your kernel? > kldstat(8) may hold the answers, unless you have the mouse compiled > directly into the kernel. Sounds like that may be your problem: > msg06918.html>. > So you could try commenting out the mouse and keyboard references, > just to see what happens.. > Another solution that you may want to look into as an alternative to > using xdm is X11 forwarding via SSH. > -Garrett Garrett, Thanks for responding. No, it's an SMP kernel which includes GENERIC. Do you mean commenting out references to mouse and keyboard in /sys/i386/conf/GENERIC? Like these: device atkbdc # AT keyboard controller device atkbd # AT keyboard device psm # PS/2 mouse That seems a little extreme - recompiling the kernel to get X to work? I'll certainly do it if the technique is endorsed by anyone ... but I'm not so much ready to "see what happens," as the server is thirty miles away behind a locked door, and I may not like what happens, at all :) Yeah, the ssh -X "trick" works great for userland stuff. But I haven't yet fingered out how to run a gui process on the remote as "root" and get by the authentication issues. Do you have any experience with that? Thanks, again. Lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 23:33:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3316916A407; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:33:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ccowart@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu) Received: from rescomp.berkeley.edu (keyserver.Rescomp.Berkeley.EDU [169.229.70.167]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D669143CDA; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:32:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ccowart@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu) Received: by rescomp.berkeley.edu (Postfix, from userid 1225) id 0DEE95B78B; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:32:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:32:54 -0800 From: Christopher Cowart To: Lane Message-ID: <20061216233254.GF4409@rescomp.berkeley.edu> References: <200612161224.14708.lane@joeandlane.com> <200612161350.12657.lane@joeandlane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="b8GWCKCLzrXbuNet" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200612161350.12657.lane@joeandlane.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: xorg on a headless, mouseless, keyboardless box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:33:13 -0000 --b8GWCKCLzrXbuNet Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > I've used this "ssh -X" that you mention. This works fine for "userland"= =20 > programs, but in order to troubleshoot my particular issue I'd need to be= =20 > logged in as root. When I try to "su" remotely to run the command I get: >=20 > X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication. > X connection to localhost:10.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown). I think what's going on is that X puts some authentication information in your home directory: ~/.Xauthority. You might try: $ su -m That will preserve your environment (including $HOME). Now when X goes looking for the ~/.Xauthority, it will find the one sshd set up in your user home directory. >=20 > I might try logging in locally as root and see what happens ....=20 >=20 > But in the long run I think that if I could understand how to grant mysel= f an=20 > actual X session on the remote box then I could figure out how to do this= and=20 > potentially other stuff. >=20 > Thanks for any information you might share. >=20 > lane > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" >=20 --=20 Chris Cowart Network and Infrastructure Systems Administrator RSSP-IT, UC Berkeley "May all your pushes be popped" --b8GWCKCLzrXbuNet Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFhIImV3SOqjnqPh0RAtXqAJ4z1xmrEUfPOXfHXkDXroXAJrbj5wCgxHDy HOnb4eqnaxRuvFzSE5DcG2M= =tn99 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --b8GWCKCLzrXbuNet-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 23:41:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F9016A412; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:41:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A12543CC1; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:41:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Gvj9n-0005V6-UA; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:41:32 -0500 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost.localnet.local [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kBGNi2Dm016930; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 17:44:02 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id kBGNi1eL016929; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 17:44:01 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: Christopher Cowart Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 17:44:01 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200612161224.14708.lane@joeandlane.com> <200612161350.12657.lane@joeandlane.com> <20061216233254.GF4409@rescomp.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <20061216233254.GF4409@rescomp.berkeley.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612161744.01856.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79812f411270e4d744354de9cddb3ac0c0350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: xorg on a headless, mouseless, keyboardless box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:41:41 -0000 On Saturday 16 December 2006 17:32, you wrote: > > I've used this "ssh -X" that you mention. This works fine for "userland" > > programs, but in order to troubleshoot my particular issue I'd need to be > > logged in as root. When I try to "su" remotely to run the command I get: > > > > X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication. > > X connection to localhost:10.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown). > > I think what's going on is that X puts some authentication information > in your home directory: ~/.Xauthority. You might try: > $ su -m > > That will preserve your environment (including $HOME). Now when X goes > looking for the ~/.Xauthority, it will find the one sshd set up in your > user home directory. > Well, Chris, that was a great suggestion! I can, in fact, run a gui root process on the remote machine, now. Unfortunately I still can't run qemu so that I can get the console. I get: X Error of failed request: BadWindow (invalid Window parameter) Major opcode of failed request: 25 (X_SendEvent) Resource id in failed request: 0x3e Serial number of failed request: 18 Current serial number in output stream: 21 Any advice on how to setup the remote (headless, mouseless, and keyboardless) server to run X? My brain is fried trying to track down a HOWTO, and the wiki is just a half millimeter left of useless. Thanks for your input! Lane > > I might try logging in locally as root and see what happens .... > > > > But in the long run I think that if I could understand how to grant > > myself an actual X session on the remote box then I could figure out how > > to do this and potentially other stuff. > > > > Thanks for any information you might share. > > > > lane > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 23:52:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BAF116A403 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:52:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dsikorsky@rhwi.net) Received: from email.rhwi.net (email.rhwi.net [64.72.68.244]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B24843CAF for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:52:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dsikorsky@rhwi.net) Received: (qmail 39035 invoked by uid 80); 16 Dec 2006 23:52:03 -0000 Received: from 67.82.150.145 (SquirrelMail authenticated user dsikorsky@rhwi.net) by mail.rhwi.net with HTTP; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:52:03 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <62266.67.82.150.145.1166313123.squirrel@mail.rhwi.net> Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:52:03 -0500 (EST) From: dsikorsky@rhwi.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: 1440x900 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:52:05 -0000 I just orderd a widescreen 19 inch, I have a radeon x300se 128mb card, and am using freebsd 6.1, gnome 2.16, and x11 6.9 (xorg) how do I use this resolution?