From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Dec 12 04:55:47 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id EAA17216 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 04:55:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from lsd.relcom.eu.net (lsd.relcom.eu.net [193.124.23.23]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA17205 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 04:55:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net) Received: (from ache@localhost) by lsd.relcom.eu.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA00364; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 15:55:10 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 15:55:09 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= X-Sender: ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net To: "David E. Cross" cc: John Kelly , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: (fwd) Re: F00F bug *fixed* in 2.0.x kernels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > but it doesn't), and I _told_ some FreeBSD people so: I even sent > > people a test-program that will still lock up a FreeBSD system with > > the "fix". It seems I miss beginning of discussion... Where is test-program he talk about? -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/