Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 20 Aug 2011 12:10:01 -0500
From:      "Conrad J. Sabatier" <>
To:        Tijl Coosemans <>
Subject:   Re: amarok doesn't support id3v2?
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References:  <> <>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:22:28 +0200
Tijl Coosemans <> wrote:

> On Wednesday 17 August 2011 07:49:13 Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> > I made a rather startling discovery tonight while playing with
> > amarok 1.4.10 and the id3v2 port.  It seems that if I modify an MP3
> > files's id3 tags in amarok, it deletes any existing id3v2 tags,
> > leaving only id3v1 tags on the file (as verified with the id3v2
> > command line tool).
> > 
> > This just seems wrong to me.  If I understand correctly, taglib,
> > which is used by amarok, does support id3v2, so why isn't amarok
> > taking advantage of this facility?
> > 
> > I rebuilt and reinstalled amarok, just to see if it would make any
> > difference, but I'm still seeing the same behavior.
> > 
> > I also installed and tried the audio/juk port (also one the of KDE3
> > multimedia family of packages, and also using taglib), and am
> > seeing the same thing there as well.  No id3v2 tags, only id3v1.
> > 
> > What's up with this?  Anyone?
> I suspect taglib uses id3v2.4 whereas id3lib (used by id3v2 port) only
> supports id3v2.3.

Ah, interesting.  Hadn't considered such a possibility.

Still, I'm puzzled.  If I take a perfectly tagged file, modify it in
any way inside amarok, and then try to view the tags again using the
command line tool id3v2, all the id3v2 tags have been blown away.

Is there that radical a change between the ID3 spec version 2.3 and 2.4
that the tags would be completely unrecognizable anymore by id3v2?

Thanks for the response.

Conrad J. Sabatier

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>