Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 21:16:37 -0500 (EST) From: Rob Miracle <rwm@MPGN.COM> To: schluntz@pinpt.com (Sean J. Schluntz) Cc: stable@freebsd.org, nate@mt.sri.com Subject: Re: Problems with 3COM Etherlink III PCMCIA card Message-ID: <199702220216.VAA10745@Central.KeyWest.MPGN.COM> In-Reply-To: <Chameleon.856571007.List@journeyman> from "Sean J. Schluntz" at Feb 21, 97 04:18:54 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > > > Yes. The card specificlly is a 3C589D. > > > > > > > Hmm, I haven't yet heard a 'working' report from a 3C589D, so I don't > > > > > > I had no problem with the 2.2-SNAP from about November (Or what ever one > > Really? Rob couldn't get the CIS tuple from the 589D to be valid. > > ... > ze: pcmcia slot1: 3Com Corporation~3C589~TP/BNC LAN Card Ver. 2a~000002~ > ... > zp0 at 0x300-0x30f irq 10 maddr 0xd8000 in isa > zp0: aui/bnc/utp address 00:a0:24:aa:11:a7 > ... > That's with the 2.2-GAMMA boot.flp. Default Kernal boot from the menu, no > mods. Looks like when I did it before (Though this time I don't have a > bracket to put the spare HD in my laptop to do a full install, but last time > it worked great!) Are you sure this is the D card? A C card popped in and worked great. Of course we could have just gotten a bad run of cards. We had two of them that behaved the same way. We even had problems getting them to run with Win95. Rob -- Rob Miracle rwm@mpgn.com for webmaster@mpgn.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702220216.VAA10745>