Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Jan 2006 04:08:47 +0100
From:      Jean-Yves Lefort <jylefort@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, ru@freebsd.org, mezz@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Flaw in print/acroread7 (was: Re: [ru@FreeBSD.org: [patch] mixed i386/amd64 ports semi-broken])
Message-ID:  <20060130040847.2ee8891f.jylefort@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060129221019.1c0a5d10@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
References:  <20060129185239.GC83362@ip.net.ua> <20060129221019.1c0a5d10@Magellan.Leidinger.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Signature=_Mon__30_Jan_2006_04_08_47_+0100_=WvdsCmX/3uKSnvj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:10:19 +0100
Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> wrote:

> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:52:40 +0200
> Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
> > I hit this problem attempting to install print/acroread7 on amd64.
> > It depends on emulators/linux_base-8, which rewrites ${ARCH} from
> > "amd64" to "i386".  Unfortunately, when linux_base-8 is processed
> > in a submake, e.g., when I run "make fetch-recursive" in
> > print/acroread7, no rewrite of ${ARCH} actually happens because
> > bsd.port.mk mistakenly thinks that ${ARCH} can never change, so
> > it's getting passed ARCH already set to "amd64", and as a highest
> > priority command-line type make(1) variable.  This results in
> > ${MD5_FILE} improperly set to distinfo.amd64 which doesn't exist.
> > Here's a fix:
> >=20
> > %%%
> > Index: bsd.port.mk
>=20
> For this particular problem: acroread7 should set ARCH like every other
> linux port does (better: every other tested linux port should do) to
> i386. But there are more flaws in Trevor's ports and I decided to let
> other people "handle" it (e.g. mezz has some patches for acroread7
> which would let the port behave more to the rules of the porters
> handbook).

Any reason to not consider (cluster test) Ruslan's solution?

--=20
Jean-Yves Lefort

jylefort@FreeBSD.org
http://lefort.be.eu.org/

--Signature=_Mon__30_Jan_2006_04_08_47_+0100_=WvdsCmX/3uKSnvj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFD3YM/yzD7UaO4AGoRArXdAJ9S1TpYcMNbmDCM0ihELdO6EACtAgCfQvTD
ZC4D3N1yS9/xAZrP1RhmnA4=
=GC1g
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Mon__30_Jan_2006_04_08_47_+0100_=WvdsCmX/3uKSnvj--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060130040847.2ee8891f.jylefort>