Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:27:02 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Ladan?= <rene@freebsd.org> To: Khilan Gudka <Khilan.Gudka@cl.cam.ac.uk> Cc: chromium@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <robert.watson@cl.cam.ac.uk>, Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>, drysdale@google.com Subject: Re: Status of sandbox/Capsicum support in the Chromium FreeBSD port Message-ID: <CADL2u4h4BDsQkum0QqpXMNBRk7h2f4p=ED3Qo53LnwXn7PPe8g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAEtTSAbYraLRKNLaamA4ScsgsTbcQSnLN6wnwQe6qSgg4aLgiQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAEtTSAbYraLRKNLaamA4ScsgsTbcQSnLN6wnwQe6qSgg4aLgiQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2014-01-30 Khilan Gudka <Khilan.Gudka@cl.cam.ac.uk>: > Dear Chromium port maintainer(s) > > I was wondering what the current status was with regards to sandboxing > renderer processes. In particular, now that Capsicum comes as standard in > FreeBSD, I'm interested in running Chromium with Capsicum enabled. Robert > Watson (my supervisor, and whose office is opposite mine) did an initial > version a few years ago (https://github.com/rwatson/chromium-capsicum) bu= t > these patches were not upstreamed. > For what its worth, George Liaskos (on chromium@) and I started submitting = our patches upstream, but it will take a while I guess given the number of patc= hes. > Are there any patches around for the latest port/plans for adding Capsicu= m > support? > > If not, then I would be very much interested in helping in this regard. > I think it would be best to propose this on the chromium developers list (chromium-dev@chromium.org) first to see if there is some general interest. Regards, Ren=E9
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADL2u4h4BDsQkum0QqpXMNBRk7h2f4p=ED3Qo53LnwXn7PPe8g>