From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 6 08:14:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C865EEB5 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 08:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lariat.net (mail.lariat.net [66.62.230.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B066D97 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 08:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Toshi.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA05632 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 01:14:38 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <201403060814.BAA05632@mail.lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 01:11:35 -0700 To: questions@freebsd.org From: Brett Glass Subject: devd seems to be much more active in FreeBSD 10.0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 08:14:48 -0000 Everyone: I'm makinga server that makes and breaks a lot of connections using mpd. Unlike earlier versions of FreeBSD, 10.0 seems to react to every new link (which involves bringing up an "ng" pseudo-interface) by running the pccard_ether script. It also seems to try running dhclient on interfaces that don't use DHCP. I've never seen it this busy before, and all of this activity is for naught; the machine doesn't use DHCP and mpd manages all the logistics of bringing up an "ng" interface itself. Why the change and all of the useless activity? --Brett Glass