Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:12:04 +0000 (UTC)
From:      "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Pavel Gubin <pg@ie.tusur.ru>
Subject:   Re: "Multiple entries for PCI IRQ 16" and "xlock already held"panics on 5.3-BETA(3,4,5)
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.53.0409271902420.11069@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>
In-Reply-To: <200409271412.27600.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20040922095257.GA81709@ie.tusur.ru> <20040923165349.GA38511@ie.tusur.ru> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0409271605230.11069@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <200409271412.27600.jhb@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, John Baldwin wrote:

> > /me does not have to understand - do I  ?
>
> You are using ACPI the second time.  I think it doesn't load the first time
> because your loader.rc is out of date (look in /usr/src/UPDATING for the
> entry about module_path).

that's correct. I had seen:

:: ACPI autoload failed - no such file or directory

but I had missed:

:: module_path=/boot/modules

*GNA* when did I fail to update this on that host:( Thanks for
pointing out. Will update it once I can re-get access to the machine.
lost ethernet and it's at the other end of the house w/o console atm.

another question - why would this work (acpi.ko preloading) if I do a
# unload acpi
the time acpi is not yet loaded and module_path still wrong ? funny
thing.


>  ACPI's tables don't really allow for duplicate
> entries for the same PCI interrupt, so you don't have this type of issue to
> worry about.

ok. then I do have my workaround though I'd like it to also work
in the other case too but I suppose there isn't much I can do with
a long time EOS board.

-- 
Bjoern A. Zeeb				bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.53.0409271902420.11069>