From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Apr 10 14:03:01 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA00216
          for questions-outgoing; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 14:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.visigenic.com (odin.visigenic.com [204.179.98.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA00204
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 14:02:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from VSI48 (vsi48.visigenic.com [206.64.15.185])
          by odin.visigenic.com (Netscape Mail Server v2.02) with SMTP
          id AAA362 for <questions@freebsd.org>;
          Thu, 10 Apr 1997 14:03:04 -0700
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970410140203.00a80ae0@visigenic.com>
X-Sender: toneil@visigenic.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 14:02:05 -0700
To: questions@freebsd.org
From: "Tim Oneil" <toneil@visigenic.com>
Subject: Re: AMD 586 CPU
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

At 02:18 PM 4/10/97 -0600, you wrote:
>I've not used and 5x86s, but now have 3 machines running on K5s and feel
>the performance is quite good.  The K5/133 outperforms the P5/133 in
>everything we've tried under FreeBSD, and is a fair bit cheaper.  YMMV.

Wes, anyone: I've cruised sysdoc.pair.com and the amd home page, and I'm
really haven't gotten a deffinitive answer to this: will the K5 work
in dual cpu mode?
 
-Tim