Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 20:28:42 +0200 From: cpghost <cpghost@cordula.ws> To: Gary Gatten <Ggatten@waddell.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD & Software RAID Message-ID: <20090526182842.GA12457@phenom.cordula.ws> In-Reply-To: <70C0964126D66F458E688618E1CD008A0793ED91@WADPEXV0.waddell.com> References: <4A1AA3DC.5020300@network-i.net> <200905261238.52979.kirk@strauser.com> <70C0964126D66F458E688618E1CD008A0793ED91@WADPEXV0.waddell.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 01:15:41PM -0500, Gary Gatten wrote: > Why avoid ZFS on x86? That's because ZFS works best with huge amounts of (Kernel-)RAM, and i386 32-bit doesn't provide enough adressing space. Btw, I've tried ZFS on two FreeBSD/amd64 test machines with 8GB and 16GB of RAM, and it looks very promising. I wouldn't put it on production servers yet, but will eventually, once FreeBSD's ZFS integration matures and stabilizes. -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090526182842.GA12457>