Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 20:06:50 +0700 (ALMST) From: Boris Popov <bp@butya.kz> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: NetWare client in -current Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909102006030.13176-100000@lion.butya.kz> In-Reply-To: <19990910111556.BC5731CA8@overcee.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Peter Wemm wrote: > > Yes, that's acceptable. But mount_nwfs require libncp.so and this > > means that ncp library sources will be also required. So KLD, mount_nwfs > > and libncp should go into source tree and other utilities can be a port. > > > > Other thoughts ? > > I'm really not sure I see the value in splitting it up like that.. Are > things like ncplogin required to support mount_nwfs? Personally, I think > it might be better to take the whole lot and later on (nearer 4.0 time) > decide if it's worth splitting the ncp* off to a port if it's worth doing. > Otherwise version skew is going to be a hassle while it's under > development. Thats why I suggested an original scheme... -- Boris Popov http://www.butya.kz/~bp/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9909102006030.13176-100000>