From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 14 20:15:06 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9260E16A4CE for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 20:15:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.blarg.net (floyd.blarg.net [206.124.128.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0250F43F3F for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 20:15:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from abowhill@blarg.net) Received: from io (vp227.dmp02.sea.blarg.net [206.124.131.227]) by mail.blarg.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 47FFB380BF; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 20:13:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <000a01c3ab2e$fb028ec0$0200000a@io> From: "Allan Bowhill" To: "Brad Knowles" References: <20031114044623.C119838124@mail.blarg.net> <000801c3ab12$93e5d560$0200000a@io> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 20:14:31 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: C/C++ X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 04:15:06 -0000 > I like the story, but I would like to point out that there is no > "Chuck". Quoting from : > > Many folks have asked about the BSD daemon's name. Contrary > to a myth first started by some advertising droid at Walnut > Creek, the daemon's name is NOT Chuck. He is very proud of > the fact that he does not have a name, he is just the BSD > daemon. If you insist on a name, call him beastie. I believe you. But it may be too late. The name is tatooed on my brain. I will try to rehabilitate my usage if I can remember. I like the idea that he doesn't have a name, but that invites marketing people to do what they do. I am tempted to believe "Chuck" may have been derived from the mysterious "Charlie &" (root) in the passwd file. Is this merely a coincidence? > But the rest of the story is a good one. Thanks! It seemed appropriate... --Allan