From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 5 19:27:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A421065675; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 19:27:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93FB88FC0C; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 19:27:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from phobos.local (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by pooker.samsco.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n55JR4ss007355; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:27:04 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <4A297187.2090701@samsco.org> Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:27:03 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer References: <4A254B45.8050800@mavhome.dp.ua> <200906050703.n5573x5Q071765@apollo.backplane.com> <4A2956C6.5070902@samsco.org> <4A29694B.2090606@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <4A29694B.2090606@elischer.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: Alexander Motin , FreeBSD Current , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WIP: ATA to CAM integration X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:27:19 -0000 Julian Elischer wrote: > Scott Long wrote: > >> >> So, before you continue to cast ignorant doubts on our approach and hawk >> your incomplete wares, please at least look at what is being done on our >> end, and make an attempt to ask some reasonable questions. >> > > I think that was a little of an over-reaction, and uncalled for.. > Matt's tone was very friendly. > > Every one of Matt's emails follow this formula: 1. I don't know how FOO works, but how you're doing it is wrong 2. Here's how I think FOO should work 3. I'm going to work on FOO in DragonFlyBSD and have it done in a week. 1 and 2 are ignorant and worthless in a technical conversation, and 3 is off topic for FreeBSD mailing lists. So yes, I'm calling him out. Scott