From owner-cvs-all Wed Jan 24 7:11:26 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F4D37B69D; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 07:11:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA60891; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:10:42 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:10:42 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200101241510.KAA60891@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/tcpdump print-smb.c In-Reply-To: <20010123223418.R26076@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <200101240237.f0O2bta29372@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010123223418.R26076@fw.wintelcom.net> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG < said: > Why not adopt a -ports like system for this where we can have a > set of patchfiles applied to the dist and direct the output to the > OBJDIR? Why don't we just accept that we have a revision control system for a reason, and use it like it was intended to be used, and stop all this BS whining about taking files off the vendor branch. Disk space is cheap. If the conflicts cause a problem when the next version is imported, get the original committer to fix it, or else drop the change. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message