Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 15 Feb 2020 09:16:25 -0500
From:      Alejandro Imass <aimass@yabarana.com>
To:        "James B. Byrne" <byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Technological advantages over Linux
Message-ID:  <CAHieY7QevsZ2aS1L_MOgo3aQ819nx2iQBWHYdfYXCCOe9AQvnQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c4f7dd054cd20d2bd28feb98a91b3f98.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca>
References:  <mailman.19234.1581703353.21076.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> <c4f7dd054cd20d2bd28feb98a91b3f98.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 4:02 PM James B. Byrne <byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca>
wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, February 14, 2020 11:27, Alejandro Imass wrote:
>
> > IMHO, BSD could invest in taking projects like EzJail (plus ZFS) to make
> > this functionality native and EASY, provide an images database and the
> > infrastructure to provide a NATIVE, bare metal equivalent to Docker +
> > Terraform. In other words, FreeBSD and other BSD projects could offer
> > NATIVE and modern CI/CD and IaaS pipelines on bare metal.
> >
> > Just food for thought.
> >
>
> 1. Presently, the dominant philosophy in FreeBDS is to remove things from
> core
> into ports; and not the other way around.
>
> 2. Having used both ezjail and iocage extensively my choice would be iocage
> over ezjail.
>
>
I am happy to have learned about iocage in this thread.

Thank you!!

Seems I am not the only one thinking along these lines...



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHieY7QevsZ2aS1L_MOgo3aQ819nx2iQBWHYdfYXCCOe9AQvnQ>