Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 11:01:35 -0600 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Can EULA's stop competition from *nix? Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20020428110036.0242a590@nospam.lariat.org> In-Reply-To: <20020428152837.A29453@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I doubt that terms prohibiting the use of competitive products are enforceable. --Brett At 08:28 AM 4/28/2002, j mckitrick wrote: >Here's a great article a friend sent me: > >http://www.itweek.co.uk/News/1131114 > >Samba outperforms Win2k, and is easier to manage besides. This is, of >course, no major surprise. However, do you think the recent EULA's from >MS will be able to (enforcably) stop Samba and other *nix tools from >competing? > >NOTE: Please CC me, as I am not currently subscribed. Thanks. > >jm >-- >My other computer is your windows box. > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20020428110036.0242a590>