From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 5 20:55:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D94B2106566B for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2011 20:55:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85DBF8FC12 for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2011 20:55:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PvyVE-0008Sz-BZ for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 21:55:04 +0100 Received: from e176062039.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.176.62.39]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 21:55:04 +0100 Received: from rotkap by e176062039.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 21:55:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Heino Tiedemann Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 21:49:28 +0100 Organization: yes Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <20110305072547.3cd0f790@seibercom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: e176062039.adsl.alicedsl.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) X-Face: v6Lci{Mw=kwHf$`7C?L-U#BHn7O\wqF-1qg#Vk%}nUQv\i^mM/.p=wU+cr)yXf#Ob+foOOxW; ir"QI!|25wG3`ywF)yh~@V.kKtr.qp+v.R; w?c@ZzM#!'/7r_+)$NjMN:]qo-]`&z~KlP}|cERO'%s9":6\ZnN/O List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 20:55:06 -0000 Jerry wrote: > On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 12:48:43 +0100 > Heino Tiedemann articulated: > >> Hi, >> >> is there someone who likes to go for the Firefox 4 in ports? >> >> maybe into www/firefox-devel? >> >> >> Firefox 4 is in the State "beta 12" - what means it is the release >> candidate. >> >> I use it already on Windows in the Office. Very good stuff! :) > > Will this new version alleviate the long standing problem of "java" not > working? If not, perhaps time might be better spend getting the latest > version of "java" working correctly with Firefox before wasting more > time porting products that require a modern version of "java" that > unfortunately FreeBSD does not offer at this time. Is there realy Java needed somewhere in the web? Heino