Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:41:13 -0700
From:      Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>
To:        "Danilo G. Baio" <dbaio@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r468060 - in head/mail: . dovecot  dovecot-pigeonhole dovecot-pigeonhole04 dovecot22
Message-ID:  <201804222241.w3MMfD1T020924@slippy.cwsent.com>
In-Reply-To: Message from "Danilo G. Baio" <dbaio@FreeBSD.org> of "Sun, 22 Apr 2018 21:35:38 -0000." <201804222135.w3MLZcg0018324@repo.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <201804222135.w3MLZcg0018324@repo.freebsd.org>, "Danilo G. 
Baio" wri
tes:
> Author: dbaio
> Date: Sun Apr 22 21:35:38 2018
> New Revision: 468060
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/468060
>
> Log:
>   Add mail/dovecot22 (v2.2.35) and mail/dovecot-pigeonhole04 (v0.4.23)
>   
>   This brings back Dovecot 2.2.35 to the tree because there is an issue
>   with version 2.3.1 and replication in some scenarios [1].
>   
>   Keep this version until this problem gets fixed upstream.
>   
>   1 - https://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2018-April/111477.html

Reading through the thread it appears that .2.2.35 also has a 
replication issue. See https://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2018-April/1
11496.html. Should we revert back to 2.2.33.2?


-- 
Cheers,
Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>
FreeBSD UNIX:  <cy@FreeBSD.org>   Web:  http://www.FreeBSD.org

	The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201804222241.w3MMfD1T020924>